We are grateful to a co-editor and three referees for their comments and suggestions. We also thank S. Anderson, K. Behrens, M. Couttenier, S. Dhingra, E. Dinopoulos, R. Ericson, R. Feenstra, P. Fleckinger, C. Gaigné, A. Gorn, G. Grossman, J. Hamilton, E. Helpman, T. Holmes, J. Martin, F. Mayneris, G. Mion, J. Morrow, P. Neary, G. Ottaviano, P. Picard, V. Polterovich, R. Romano, O. Shepotilo, O. Skiba, D. Tarr, M. Turner, X. Vives, S. Weber, D. Weinstein, and H. Yildirim for helpful discussions and remarks. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Russian Federation under Grant 11.G34.31.0059 and the Economics Education and Research Consortium (EERC) under Grant 08-036.
Monopolistic Competition: Beyond the Constant Elasticity of Substitution
Article first published online: 26 NOV 2012
DOI: 10.3982/ECTA9986
© 2012 The Econometric Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Zhelobodko, E., Kokovin, S., Parenti, M. and Thisse, J.-F. (2012), Monopolistic Competition: Beyond the Constant Elasticity of Substitution. Econometrica, 80: 2765–2784. doi: 10.3982/ECTA9986
- †
We are grateful to a co-editor and three referees for their comments and suggestions. We also thank S. Anderson, K. Behrens, M. Couttenier, S. Dhingra, E. Dinopoulos, R. Ericson, R. Feenstra, P. Fleckinger, C. Gaigné, A. Gorn, G. Grossman, J. Hamilton, E. Helpman, T. Holmes, J. Martin, F. Mayneris, G. Mion, J. Morrow, P. Neary, G. Ottaviano, P. Picard, V. Polterovich, R. Romano, O. Shepotilo, O. Skiba, D. Tarr, M. Turner, X. Vives, S. Weber, D. Weinstein, and H. Yildirim for helpful discussions and remarks. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Russian Federation under Grant 11.G34.31.0059 and the Economics Education and Research Consortium (EERC) under Grant 08-036.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 26 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 26 NOV 2012
- Manuscript received April, 2011; final revision received March, 2012.
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Cited in:
- CrossRef
This article has been cited by:
- 1, Second-best cost–benefit analysis in monopolistic competition models of urban agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics, 2013, 76, 83

1468-0262/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=2354090f3c3edb76f7671a0522004359de7605e9)
1468-0262/asset/ECTA_centre.gif?v=1&s=0033482be8fb6a261a39223ed9b6d1ddf8b0bbea)
