SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ammermueller, A. and J.-S. Pischke (2009), “Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from PIRLS. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 315348.
  • Bishop, J. H., M. Bishop, L. Gelbwasser, S. Green, and A. Zuckerman (2003), “Nerds and freaks: A theory of student culture and norms. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 6, 141199.
  • Bisin, A., A. Moro, and G. Topa (2011), “The empirical content of models with multiple equilibria in economies with social interactions.” Working Paper 17196, National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: 10.3386/w17196
  • Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin (2009), “Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150 (1), 4155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021
  • Brock, W. A. and S. N. Durlauf (2001a), “Discrete choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies, 68 (2), 235260. DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00168
    Direct Link:
  • Brock, W. A. and S. N. Durlauf (2001b), “Interactions-based models.” In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5 (J. Heckman and E. Leamer, eds.), 32973380, Elsevier, Amsterdam .
  • Calvo-Armengol, A., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou (2009), “Peer effects and social networks in education. Review of Economic Studies, 76 (4), 12391267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00550.x
    Direct Link:
  • Chemerinsky, E. (2003), “The segregation and resegregation of American public education: The courts' role. North Carolina Law Review, 81 (4), 15971622.
  • Chernozhukov, V. and C. Hansen (2005), “An IV model of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica, 73 (1), 245261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00570.x
  • Clotfelter, C. T., H. F. Ladd, and J. L. Vigdor (2003), “Segregation and resegregation in North Carolina's public school classrooms. North Carolina Law Review, 81 (4), 14631512.
  • Clotfelter, C. T., J. L. Vigdor, H. F. Ladd, and R. A. Diaz (2004), “Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23 (2), 251271. DOI: 10.1002/pam.20003
  • Epple, D. and R. Romano (2010), “Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence.” In Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1B (J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, and M. O. Jackson, eds.), Chapter 20, 10531164, North-Holland, Amsterdam , The Netherlands .
  • Figlio, D. N. (2007), “Boys named Sue: Disruptive children and their peers. Education Finance and Policy, 2 (4), 376394. DOI: 10.1162/edfp.2007.2.4.376
  • Fordham, S. and J. Ogbu (1986), “Black students' school success: Coping with the ‘burden of acting white’. The Urban Review, 18, 176206. DOI: 10.1007/BF01112192
  • Fruehwirth, J. C. (2012), “Can achievement peer effect estimates inform policy? A view from inside the black box.” Working paper, University of Cambridge .
  • Fryer Jr., R. G. and P. Torelli (2010), “An empirical analysis of ‘acting white’. Journal of Public Economics, 94 (5–6), 380396.
  • Gibbons, S. and S. Telhaj (2008), “Peers and achievement in England's secondary schools.” Discussion Paper 0001, Spatial Economics Research Centre, LSE .
  • Giorgi, G. D., M. Pellizzari, and S. Redaelli (2010), “Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (2), 241275. DOI: 10.1257/app.2.2.241
  • Graham, B. S. (2008), “Identifying social interactions through conditional variance restrictions. Econometrica, 76 (3), 643660. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00850.x
  • Graham, B. S., G. W. Imbens, and G. Ridder (2010), “Measuring the effects of segregation in the presence of social spillovers: A nonparametric approach.” Working Paper 16499, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hanushek, E. A., J. F. Kain, J. M. Markman, and S. G. Rivkin (2003), “Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (5), 527544. DOI: 10.1002/jae.741
  • Hanushek, E. A., J. F. Kain, and S. G. Rivkin (2009), “New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27 (3), 349383. DOI: 10.1086/600386
  • Hoxby, C. (2000), “Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation.” Working Paper 7867, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hoxby, C. M. and G. Weingarth (2005), “Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects.” Working Paper, Harvard University .
  • Imbens, G. W. and W. K. Newey (2009), “Identification and estimation of triangular simultaneous equations models without additivity. Econometrica, 77 (5), 14811512. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA7108
  • Jacob, B. (2005), “Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89 (5–6), 761796. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004
  • Lavy, V., M. D. Paserman, and A. Schlosser (2012), “Inside the black box of ability peer effects: Evidence from variation in the proportion of low achievers in the classroom. Economic Journal, 122 (559), 208237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02463.x
  • Lavy, V. and A. Schlosser (2011), “Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3 (2), 133. DOI: 10.1257/app.3.2.1
  • Lazear, E. P. (2001), “Educational production. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (3), 777803. DOI: 10.1162/00335530152466232
  • Manski, C. (1993), “Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60 (3), 531542. DOI: 10.2307/2298123
  • Moffitt, R. A. (2001), “Policy interventions, low-level equilibria and social interactions.” In Social Dynamics (S. N. Durlauf and H. P. Young, eds.), 4582, Brookings Institution Press, Washington , DC .
  • Neal, D. A. and D. W. Schanzenbach (2010), “Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92 (2), 263283. DOI: 10.1162/rest.2010.12318
  • Reback, R. (2008), “Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 92 (5–6), 13941415. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.003
  • Rivkin, S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain (2005), “Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73 (2), 417458. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
  • Sacerdote, B. (2011), “Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far?” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3, Chapter 4, 249277, Elsevier, Amsterdam .
  • Schaffer, M. E. (2005), “xtivreg2: Stata module to perform extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class regression for panel data models.” Statistical software components, Boston College Department of Economics .
  • Sweeting, A. (2009), “The strategic timing of radio commercials: An empirical analysis using multiple equilibria. RAND Journal of Economics, 40 (4), 710742. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00086.x
  • Vigdor, J. and T. Nechyba (2004), “Peer effects in elementary school: Learning from ‘apparent’ random assignment.” Working paper, Duke University .
  • Vigdor, J. and T. Nechyba (2007), “Peer effects in North Carolina Public Schools.” In Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem (P. Peterson and L. Woessmann, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge .