Get access

The Negative Chronotropic Effect in Rat Heart Stimulated by Ultrasonic Pulses: Role of Sex and Age

Authors

  • Olivia C. Coiado PhD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering, University of Portland, Portland, Oregon USA
    • Address correspondence to Olivia C. Coiado, PhD, Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering, University of Portland, 5000 N. Willamette Blvd, Portland, OR 97203 USA. E-mail: coiado@up.edu

    Search for more papers by this author
  • William D. O'Brien Jr PhD

    1. Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois USA
    Search for more papers by this author

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R37 EB002641). The authors would like to acknowledge the technical assistance by Rita J. Miller, DVM, Emily Hartman, BS, RDMS, and Sandhya Sarwate, MD.

Abstract

Objectives

The goal of this study is to investigate the role of sex and age of the negative chronotropic effect after exposure of 3.5-MHz pulsed ultrasound (US) to the rat heart.

Methods

Forty F344 rats were exposed transthoracically to ultrasonic pulses at a duty factor of approximately 1.0% at 2.0-MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude. The transthoracic ultrasonic bursts were delivered consecutively in five 10-s intervals, that is, 10 s of 6-Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF), 10 s of 5-Hz PRF, 10 s of 4-Hz PRF, 10 s of 5-Hz PRF, and 10 s of 6-Hz, for a 50-s total exposure duration. The rats were divided into 8 groups (n = 5 each): US young male, control young male, US young female, control young female, US old male, control old male, US old female, and control old female.

Results

Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to compare heart rate, cardiac output, arterial pressure, and other hemodynamic values (baseline) before and after US stimulation. Sex versus age versus US interaction was detected for heart rate. Cardiac output showed an age effect, and ejection fraction showed age and US effects. The arterial pressure showed a sex effect. A negative chronotropic effect (∼30% decrease in heart rate) was observed for young female rats. An hypothesis is that the US effect is weight (menopause) dependent, because the young (premenopausal) female rats weighed approximately 40 to 60% less than other groups of rats.

Conclusions

It is likely that the ovarian hormones are responsible for different US-induced cardiac bioeffects in different ages and sexes.

Ancillary