Zvi Carmeli and Rachel Blass The case against neuroplastic analysis: A further illustration of the irrelevance of neuroscience to psychoanalysis through a critique of Doidge's The Brain that Changes Itself The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 94
Article first published online: 12 FEB 2013 | DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.12022
Complete the form below and we will send an e-mail message containing a link to the selected article on your behalf
Required = Required Field
Choose captcha format: Image or Audio. Click here if you need help.