Back to:

Methodological Issues in the Neuroscience of Moral Judgement

Authors

  • GUY KAHANE,
  • NICHOLAS SHACKEL
  • DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01401.x

Citing Literature

  • Number of times cited: 28
  1. 1Veljko Dubljević, Debates About Neuroethics, 2017, 129CrossRef
  2. 2Jonathon Hricko, Derek Leben, In Defense of Best-Explanation Debunking Arguments in Moral Philosophy, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2017CrossRef
  3. 3Kaleda K. Denton, Dennis L. Krebs, Rational and Emotional Sources of Moral Decision-Making: an Evolutionary-Developmental Account, Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2017, 3, 1, 72CrossRef
  4. 4Regina A. Rini, Why moral psychology is disturbing, Philosophical Studies, 2017, 174, 6, 1439CrossRef
  5. 5Zachary Horne, Derek Powell, Elisabeth Hildt, How Large Is the Role of Emotion in Judgments of Moral Dilemmas?, PLOS ONE, 2016, 11, 7, e0154780CrossRef
  6. 6Emilian Mihailov, Is Deontology a Moral Confabulation?, Neuroethics, 2016, 9, 1, 1CrossRef
  7. 7Guy Kahane, Jim A.C. Everett, Brian D. Earp, Miguel Farias, Julian Savulescu, ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good, Cognition, 2015, 134, 193CrossRef
  8. 8Edward B. Royzman, Justin F. Landy, Robert F. Leeman, Are Thoughtful People More Utilitarian? CRT as a Unique Predictor of Moral Minimalism in the Dilemmatic Context, Cognitive Science, 2015, 39, 2, 325Wiley Online Library
  9. 9C. D. Meyers, Brains, trolleys, and intuitions: Defending deontology from the Greene/Singer argument, Philosophical Psychology, 2015, 28, 4, 466CrossRef
  10. 10Regina A. Rini, Feedback from moral philosophy to cognitive science, Philosophical Psychology, 2015, 28, 4, 569CrossRef
  11. 11Regina A. Rini, How not to test for philosophical expertise, Synthese, 2015, 192, 2, 431CrossRef
  12. 12Betsy J. Grey, Implications of Neuroscience Advances in Tort Law: A General Overview, Indiana Health Law Review, 2015, 12, 2, 671CrossRef
  13. 13Caspar G. Chorus, Models of moral decision making: Literature review and research agenda for discrete choice analysis, Journal of Choice Modelling, 2015, 16, 69CrossRef
  14. 14Guy Kahane, Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment, Social Neuroscience, 2015, 10, 5, 551CrossRef
  15. 15Daniel M. Bartels, Christopher W. Bauman, Fiery A. Cushman, David A. Pizarro, A. Peter McGraw, The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 2015, 478CrossRef
  16. 16Elizabeth O’Neill, Which Causes of Moral Beliefs Matter?, Philosophy of Science, 2015, 82, 5, 1070CrossRef
  17. 17Jonathan Baron, Sydney Scott, Katrina Fincher, S. Emlen Metz, Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2015, 4, 3, 265CrossRef
  18. 18Alejandro Rosas, Michael Koenigs, Beyond “utilitarianism”: Maximizing the clinical impact of moral judgment research, Social Neuroscience, 2014, 1CrossRef
  19. 19Tommaso Bruni, Matteo Mameli, Regina A. Rini, The Science of Morality and its Normative Implications, Neuroethics, 2014, 7, 2, 159CrossRef
  20. 20Terbeck Sylvia, Kahane Guy, McTavish Sarah, Savulescu Julian, Levy Neil, Hewstone Miles, Philip J. Cowen, Beta adrenergic blockade reduces utilitarian judgement, Biological Psychology, 2013, 92, 2, 323CrossRef