Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
© John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Edited By: Professor S. N. Lane
Impact Factor: 2.695
ISI Journal Citation Reports © Ranking: 2013: 14/46 (Geography Physical); 36/174 (Geosciences Multidisciplinary)
Online ISSN: 1096-9837
Just Published Articles
- Glaciokarst landforms and processes of the Southern Dinaric Alps
Manja Žebre and Uroš Stepišnik
Accepted manuscript online: 3 MAR 2015 07:33PM EST | DOI: 10.1002/esp.3731
- UAS-based remote sensing of Wuvial change following an extreme Wood event
A. D. Tamminga, B. C. Eaton and C. H. Hugenholtz
Accepted manuscript online: 1 MAR 2015 09:50PM EST | DOI: 10.1002/esp.3728
- Identification of peneplains by multi-parameter assessment of digital elevation models
Vicky L. Haider, Jan Kropáček, István Dunkl, Bianca Wagner and Hilmar von Eynatten
Accepted manuscript online: 28 FEB 2015 01:04AM EST | DOI: 10.1002/esp.3729
- An entrainment model for non-uniform sediment
Mohamed Elhakeem and Ahmed M. A. Sattar
Article first published online: 27 FEB 2015 | DOI: 10.1002/esp.3715
- Process oriented use of geostatistics to analyse creeping para-glacial features
Eric Bardou, Guillaume Favre-Bulle, Claire Faucheux, Nicolas Jeannée and Pascal Ornstein
Article first published online: 27 FEB 2015 | DOI: 10.1002/esp.3711
OnlineOpen – The Open Access Option for Authors
OnlineOpen is available to authors submitting to Earth Surface Processes and Landforms who wish to make their article open access, free to read, download and share via Wiley Online Library.
Making your article OnlineOpen increases its potential readership and enables you to meet institutional and funder open access mandates where they apply. Authors of OnlineOpen articles may immediately post the final, published PDF of their article on a website, institutional repository or other free public server. OnlineOpen complies with new open access mandates from RCUK and Wellcome Trust.
Gold Access is where an article is made free to access in ESPL after payment of a publication fee, by either the author, their employer or funder.
Green Access is when an article is made free to access in an institutional repository, this is known as self-archiving. At ESPL, articles can be self-archived after an embargo period of 12 months from publication on EarlyView, but this may vary upon request to meet a funder’s policies.
Learn more about your open access options with OnlineOpen.
Is there a geomorphological case for the Anthropocene?
Chaired by Stephen Tooth, with panellists Professor Tony Brown, Simon Price and Professor Andreas Lang. Are we in the Anthropocene and no longer in the Holocene? Has human activity integrated and changed natural processes? Have we created our own geological time period?
The Anthropocene: is there a geomorphological case?
The ‘Anthropocene’, as used to describe the interval of recent Earth history during which humans have had an ‘overwhelming’ effect on the Earth system, is now being formally considered as a possible new geological Epoch. Such a new geological time interval (possibly equivalent to the Pleistocene Epoch) requires both theoretical justification as well as empirical evidence preserved within the geological record. Since the geological record is driven by geomorphological processes that produce terrestrial and near-shore stratigraphy, geomorphology has to be an integral part of this consideration. For this reason, the British Society for Geomorphology (BSG) has inaugurated a Fixed Term Working Group to consider this issue and advise the Society on how geomorphologists can engage with debates over the Anthropocene.
The value of a formally defined Anthropocene for geomorphologists is discussed. Human impacts have been diachronistic, multifaceted and episodic, as demonstrated by the record of alluvial deposition in the UK. Rather than boxing time into discrete eras or periods, modern research uses calendar dates and multiple dating techniques to explore co-trajectories for a range of human impacts. Despite the value of ‘The Anthropocene’ as an informal concept and as a prompt to useful debate, arriving at a single, generally acceptable formal definition is impractical, and has some disadvantages.
Excellence in Reviewing Award
Congratulations to Professor Tracy Brennand, the winner of the 2014 Michael J Kirkby Award for Excellence in Reviewing for Earth Surface Processes and Landforms in 2013.
Best Paper in 2012 Award
Congratulations to Cliff Riebe and Darryl Granger, the winners of the 2014 Wiley Prize for the Best Paper in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms in 2013. Quantifying effects of deep and near-surface chemical erosion on cosmogenic nuclides in soils, saprolite, and sediment.
Seeking good peer review in geomorphology
Stuart N. Lane
This paper provides an extended guide to reviewing for ESPL in particular and geomorphology in general. After a brief consideration of both how we choose reviewers and why we hope that reviewers will accept, I consider what makes a fair and constructive review.
State-of-the-Science papers are now a regular feature of the first issue of the journal each calendar year. These papers not only review but also reframe and reformulate our current understanding of key geomorphological questions.AG/AIG Newsletters
From March 2014 onwards, the newsletters of the International Association of Geomorphologists will not be printed in ESPL nor included in issues online. However, we have decided to host them on the ESPL homepage here, so please see the latest newsletter (No. 30 (4/2014)) by clicking here.
Search Engine Optimization: For Authors
Read our SEO Guidelines for Authors document containing top tips to make your article discoverable online.
Are you a Chinese Author? Do you need advice on writing a paper?
This article, written by Professor Stuart Lane, editor of Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, provides excellent guidelines for Chinese authors. The article has been translated into local language for easy reading and comprehension.