Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
© Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians)
Edited By: David Isaacs
Impact Factor: 1.477
ISI Journal Citation Reports © Ranking: 2015: 63/120 (Pediatrics)
Online ISSN: 1440-1754
SUBMISSION OF MANUSCRIPTS
Thank you for your interest in Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Please read the complete Author Guidelines carefully prior to submission, including the section on copyright. To ensure fast peer review and publication, manuscripts that do not adhere to the following instructions will be returned to the corresponding author for technical revision before undergoing peer review.
Note that submission implies that the content has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere except as a brief abstract in the proceedings of a scientific meeting or symposium.
Once you have prepared your submission in accordance with the Guidelines, manuscripts should be submitted online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jpch
We are looking forward to your submission.
EDITORIAL AND CONTENT CONSIDERATIONS
Aims And Scope
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health is the official journal of the Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians) in affiliation with the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Paediatric Research Society of Australia and the Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons, and publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles and Editorial Correspondence are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
Editorial Review and Acceptance
The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editors. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editors.
Manuscripts should be written so that they are intelligible to the professional reader who is not a specialist in the particular field. Where contributions are judged as acceptable for publication on the basis of scientific content, the Editors or the Publisher reserve the right to modify typescripts to eliminate ambiguity and repetition and improve communication between author and reader.
Authors must state that the protocol for the research project has been approved by a suitably constituted Ethics Committee of the institution within which the work was undertaken and that it conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Brazil 2013) available at http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.
All investigations on human subjects must include a statement that the subject(s) gave informed consent and patient anonymity should be preserved.
In general, submission of Instructive Cases and Case Notes should be accompanied by the written consent of the subject (or parent/guardian) prior to publication; this is particularly important where photographs are to be used or in cases where the unique nature of the incident reported makes it possible for the patient to be identified. While the Editors recognise that it might not always be possible or appropriate to seek such consent, the onus will be on the authors to demonstrate that this exception applies in their case.
Conflict of interest
Authors should declare any financial support or relationships that may pose conflict of interest. If there is none, this should be stated.
Authors submitting papers to Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health have a responsibility to ensure that the submitted paper follows good ethical principals, as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics or COPE website: http://publicationethics.org/
In particular, authors should be sure that they could not be accused of:
1. Plagiarism: when authors used the words, ideas and results of other authors to an unacceptable extent without acknowledgement.
2. Redundant publication: re-use of the authors' own data without acknowledgement (sometimes called dual or duplicate publication).
The Journal will follow the recommended policy of COPE with regard to transgressions, as outlined in the COPE flowcharts http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts
Authors should be aware that Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health considers infringements regarding plagiarism and redundant publication to be serious ethical lapses. The Journal will reject inappropriately submitted papers and may demand retraction of infringing papers that are inadvertently published. In addition, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health advises authors that serious cases may be reported to the author's parent institution, a course that COPE recommends should be considered.
Reproduction of Copyright Material
If excerpts from copyrighted works owned by third parties are included, credit must be shown in the contribution. It is the author’s responsibility to also obtain written permission for reproduction from the copyright owners. For more information visit Wiley’s Copyright Terms & Conditions FAQ at http://exchanges.wiley.com/authors/faqs---copyright-terms--conditions_301.html.
Annotations should be no more than 1500 words with a maximum of 12 references. Authors must supply a maximum of 5 key words and an unstructured abstract. Authors must supply three brief 'Key Points' summarising the main points raised in the manuscript. Authors must also provide 3 multiple choice questions (preferably 'A-type' single best of 5 alternatives with brief explanations for each answer) based on their Annotation. Please ensure that brief explanations are provided for both correct and incorrect answers.
Editorial Comments should be no more than 1500 words with a maximum of 12 references. Authors must supply a one-line summary of the key point raised and provide a reference to the manuscript(s) the paper comments on.
Original Articles should be no more than 2500 words with a structured abstract that states in 250 words or fewer the purpose, basic procedures, main findings and principal conclusions of the study. Divide the abstract with the headings: Aim, Methods, Results, Conclusions. Authors must supply up to three brief points 'What is already known on this topic' and up to three brief points stating 'What this paper adds'.
Review Articles should be no more than 2500 words with a maximum of 50 references. Abstracts can be either structured or unstructured, at a maximum of 150 words. The abstract should not contain abbreviations or references. Authors must supply three brief 'Key Points' summarising the main points raised in the manuscript. Authors must also provide 3 multiple choice questions (preferably 'A-type' single best of 5 alternatives with brief explanations for each answer) based on their Review. Please ensure that brief explanations are provided for both correct and incorrect answers.
The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health has amended its Case Report section. New Case Notes/Reports will now only be considered for publication in the Letters to the Editor section. In order to suit this format, manuscripts need to be formatted as a Letter to the Editor and be approximately 400 words in length, with no more than one figure or table, and a maximum of four references.
Clinical Trials must be registered with the appropriate governing body.
Instructive Cases involve a clinical problem or issue of clear educational benefit. There is an initial case report, then a brief discussion with appropriate references. No abstract or key words are required (when the website requests an Abstract, type N/A for 'not applicable'). A Summary listing learning points should be included at the end of the Instructive Case. Instructive Cases should be no more than 1200 words in length, with no more than 3 figures or tables and a maximum of 8 references. Authors must also provide 3 multiple choice questions (preferably 'A-type' single best of 5 alternatives with brief explanations for each answer) based on their Instructive Case. Please ensure that brief explanations are provided for both correct and incorrect answers.
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor should be no more than 400 words in length, with no more than one figure or table, and a maximum of four references.
Heads Up submissions should be a summary, approximately 200 words, of a recent paper of interest. This should not be the abstract but a short digest of the results, putting them in context of what the paper adds. Please attach a file with a single graph or histogram (preferably not a table) from the paper to make the most important point visually (not essential). A photograph or illustration (subject to copyright) would also be suitable. The names of authors of Heads Up pieces will be published.
Journal club articles should be no more than 2500 words. They should reflect what happens at journal clubs where doctors come with a clinical question, search for evidence, critically appraise the best evidence and then apply it to their patient, reflecting how the research could have been conducted better. The paper should be divided into the headings: Clinical scenario, Structured clinical question, Search strategy, Table (of relevant papers found in the search), Critical appraisal of all relevant papers (using standard critical appraisal guidelines), followed by a brief discussion of how to do the research better, how to apply the information to the patient and the clinical bottom line.
|Citations||Study population||Study design and Level of evidence||Results||Comments|
Image of the Month
Please send a photograph or other image, together with a short clinical question and a brief answer. For an example, please follow these links: Question and Answer. If the photograph is identifiable, please send written permission from a parent and/or child or confirm that verbal approval has been obtained. Privacy is the responsibility of the author(s).
Position Papers express the consenses view of an organisation, e.g. about the management of a condition. Any recommendations should be evidence-based and should state the Level of Evidence (using NHMRC criteria). They should be up to 2,500 words long with a maximum of 50 references.
Viewpoint is available for papers expressing a personal practice or personal view on medical or non-medical topics that are relevant to the readers. They can be up to 2,500 words long and referenced if appropriate.
Ethical debate is available for papers describing an ethical dilemma in clinical practice. They may argue only one perspective or two different viewpoints. They can be up to 2,500 words long and reference if appropriate.
Brief Communications are used to fill gaps in the JPCH and will be indexed. They are supposed to be entertaining, humorous, informative, thought-provoking or all of the above. They should be relevant, in a broad sense, to paediatrics and those who work in child health. They should be no longer than 600 words. Examples include humorous or poignant stories or instructive mistakes. Consent will be needed if the subject of the Brief Communication is identifiable.
FIllers are used to fill gaps in the JPCH, but are not indexed. They are supposed to be entertaining, humorous, informative, thought-provoking or all of the above. Examples of Fillers include cartoons and poems. Consent will be needed if the subject of the Filler is identifiable.
PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS
Pre-acceptance English-language editing
Authors for whom English is a second language may choose to have their manuscript professionally edited before submission to improve the English. Visit our site to learn about the options. All services are paid for and arranged by the author. Please note using the Wiley English Language Editing Service does not guarantee that your paper will be accepted by this journal.
A video abstract can be a quick way to make the message of your research accessible to a much larger audience. Wiley and its partner Research Square offer a service of professionally produced video abstracts, available to authors of articles accepted in this journal. You can learn more about it, and purchase one for your article, at https://www.wileuauthors.com/videoabstracts. If you have any questions, please direct them to email@example.com .
Optimising Your Article for Search Engines
Many students and researchers looking for information online will use search engines such as Google, Yahoo or similar. By optimising your article for search engines, you will increase the chance of someone finding it. This in turn will make it more likely to be viewed and/or cited in another work. We have compiled these guidelines to enable you to maximise the web-friendliness of the most public part of your article.
Style of the Manuscript
Manuscripts should follow the style of the Vancouver agreement detailed in the International Comiittee of Medical Journal Editors' revised 'Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication', as presented at http://www.ICMJE.org
The journal uses UK spelling and authors should therefore follow the latest edition of the Concise Oxford Dictionary.
All measurements must be given in SI units.
Abbreviations should be used sparingly and only where they ease the reader’s task by reducing repetition of long, technical terms. Initially use the word in full, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Thereafter use the abbreviation.
Upon its first use in the title, abstract and text, the common name of a species should be followed by the scientific name (Genus, species and authority) in parentheses. However, for well-known species, the scientific name may be omitted from the article title. If no common name exists in English, the scientific name should be used only.
At the first mention of a chemical substance, give the generic name only. Trade names should not used.
Drugs should be referred to by their generic names, rather than brand names.
Equations should be numbered sequentially with Arabic numerals; these should be ranged right in parentheses. All variables should appear in italics. Use the simplest possible form for all mathematical symbols.
Parts of the Manuscript
The manuscript should be submitted in separate files: title page; main text file; figures.
The title page should contain (i) a short informative title that contains the major key words. The title should not contain abbreviations (ii) the type of manuscript (e.g. Original Article, Instructive Case, Editorial Correspondence: Case Note), (iii) the full names of the authors and (iv) the addresses of the institutions at which the work was carried out together with (v) the full postal and email address, plus telephone numbers, of the author to whom correspondence about the manuscript, proofs and requests for offprints should be sent. The present address of any author, if different from that where the work was carried out, should be supplied in a footnote.
As papers are double-blind peer reviewed the main text file should not include any information that might identify the authors. The main text of the manuscript should be presented in the following order: (i) abstract and key words, (ii) text, (iii) acknowledgements (iv) references, (v) tables (each table complete with title and footnotes), (vi) figure legends. Figures and supporting information should be submitted as separate files. Footnotes to the text are not allowed and any such material should be incorporated into the text as parenthetical matter.
Abstract and Key words
Please refer to the section 'Manuscript Categories' for details about which article types require abstracts. Key words should be taken from those recommended by the US National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) browser list.
Authors should use subheadings to divide the sections of their manuscript: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion.
The source of financial grants and other funding should be acknowledged, including a frank declaration of the authors’ industrial links and affiliations. The contribution of colleagues or institutions should also be acknowledged. Thanks to anonymous reviewers are not allowed.
The Vancouver system of referencing should be used. In the text, references should be cited using superscript Arabic numerals in the order in which they appear. If cited only in tables or figure legends, number them according to the first identification of the table or figure in the text. In the reference list, the references should be numbered and listed in order of appearance in the text.
Cite the names of all authors when there are six or fewer; when there are seven or more list the first three followed by et al.
Names of journals should be abbreviated in the style used in Index Medicus.
Reference to unpublished data and personal communications should not appear in the list but should be cited in the text only (e.g. A Smith, unpubl. data, 2000).
1 Soter NA, Wasserman SI, Austen KF. Cold urticaria: release into the circulation of histamine and eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis during cold challenge. N. Engl. J. Med. 1976; 294: 687–90.
Online article not yet published in an issue
An online article that has not yet been published in an issue (therefore has no volume, issue or page numbers) can be cited by its Digital Object Identifier (DOI). The DOI will remain valid and allow an article to be tracked even after its allocation to an issue.
Hall, A. and Jones G. V. (2008) Effect of potential atmospheric warming on temperature-based indices describing Australian winegrape growing conditions. The Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00035.x
2 Kaufmann HE, Baron BA, McDonald MB, Waltman SR, eds. The Cornea. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1988.
Chapter in a Book
3 McEwen WK, Goodner IK. Secretion of tears and blinking. In: Davson H, ed. The Eye, Vol. 3, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, 1969; 34–78.
These should be placed at the end of the paper, numbered in Roman numerals and referred to in the text. If written by a person other than the author of the main text, the writer’s name should be included below the title.
Tables should be self-contained and complement, but not duplicate, information contained in the text. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals. Each table should be presented on a separate sheet of A4 paper with a comprehensive but concise legend above the table. Tables should be double-spaced and vertical lines should not be used to separate columns. Column headings should be brief, with units of measurement in parentheses; all abbreviations should be defined in footnotes. Footnote symbols: †, ‡, §, ¶ should be used (in that order) and *, **, *** should be reserved for P-values. Statistical measures such as SD or SEM should be identified in the headings. The table and its legend/footnotes should be understandable without reference to the text.
Legends should be self-explanatory and typed on a separate page. The legend should incorporate definitions of any symbols used and all abbreviations and units of measurement should be explained so that the figure and its legend are understandable without reference to the text.
All illustrations (line drawings and photographs) are classified as figures. Figures should be cited in consecutive order in the text. Figures should be sized to fit within the column (80 mm), intermediate (121 mm) or the full text width (169 mm). Magnifications should be indicated using a scale bar on the illustration.
Preparation of Electronic Figures for Publication: Although low quality images are adequate for review purposes, print publication requires high quality images to prevent the final product being blurred or fuzzy. Submit EPS (line art) or TIFF (halftone/photographs) files only. MS PowerPoint and Word Graphics are unsuitable for printed pictures. Do not use pixel-oriented programmes. Scans (TIFF only) should have a resolution of 300 dpi (halftone) or 600 to 1200 dpi (line drawings) in relation to the reproduction size (see below). EPS files should be saved with fonts embedded (and with a TIFF preview if possible). For scanned images, the scanning resolution (at final image size) should be as follows to ensure good reproduction: line art: >600 dpi; half-tones (including gel photographs): >300 dpi; figures containing both halftone and line images: >600 dpi.
More advice on figures can be found at Wiley’s guidelines for preparation of figures: http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/illustration.asp
A cover letter may be submitted if you wish via the ‘Cover Letter Field’ of the ScholarOne system. The text can be entered directly into the field or uploaded as a file.
Two Word-files need to be included upon submission: A title page file and a main text file that includes all parts of the text in the sequence indicated in the section 'Parts of the manuscript', including tables and figure legends but excluding figures which should be supplied separately.
The main text file should be prepared using Microsoft Word, using 1.5 line spacing. All pages should be numbered consecutively in the top right-hand corner, beginning with the first page of the main text file.
Each figure should be supplied as a separate file, with the figure number incorporated in the file name. For submission, low-resolution figures saved as .jpg or .bmp files should be uploaded, for ease of transmission during the review process. Upon acceptance of the article, high-resolution figures (at least 300 d.p.i.) saved as .eps or .tif files will be required.
PUBLICATION PROCESS AFTER ACCEPTANCE
Accepted papers will be passed to Wiley’s production team for publication. The author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Wiley’s Author Services, where via the Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS) they will be asked to complete an electronic license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper. More details on the copyright and licencing options for the journal appear below.
Wiley’s Author Services
Author Services enables authors to track their article through the production process to publication online and in print. Authors can check the status of their articles online and choose to receive automated e-mails at key stages of production. The corresponding author will receive a unique link that enables them to register and have their article automatically added to the system. Visit http://www.authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/eachecklist.asp for more details on online production tracking and for a wealth of resources including FAQs and tips on article preparation, submission and more.
It is essential that corresponding authors supply an email address to which correspondence can be emailed while their article is in production.
Notification of the URL from where to download a Portable Document Format (PDF) typeset page proof, associated forms and further instructions will be sent by email to the corresponding author.
The purpose of the PDF proof is a final check of the layout, and of tables and figures. Alterations other than the essential correction of errors are unacceptable at PDF proof stage. The proof should be checked, and approval to publish the article should be emailed to the Publisher by the date indicated in order not to delay prompt publication.
The journal offers rapid speed to publication via Wiley’s Early View service. Early View articles are complete full-text articles published online in advance of their publication in a printed issue. Early View articles are complete and final. They have been fully reviewed, revised and edited for publication, and the authors' final corrections have been incorporated. Because they are in final form, no changes can be made after online publication. Early View articles are given a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), which allows the article to be cited and tracked before allocation to an issue. After print publication, the DOI remains valid and can continue to be used to cite and access the article. More information about DOIs can be found at http://www.doi.org/faq.html.
A PDF reprint of the article will be supplied free of charge to the corresponding author. Additional printed offprints may be ordered online for a fee. Please click on the following link and fill in the necessary details and ensure that you type information in all of the required fields: http://offprint.cosprinters.com/cos. If you have queries about offprints please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Author Marketing Toolkit
The Wiley Author Marketing Toolkit provide authors with support on how to use social media, publicity, conferences, multimedia, email and the web to promote their article.
Supporting information is hosted online separately to the article. This should be used for information that is not essential to the article but that provides greater depth and background. It may include tables, figures, videos, datasets, etc. This material can be submitted with your manuscript, and will appear online, without editing or typesetting. Guidelines on how to prepare this material and which formats and files sizes are acceptable can be found at: www.wileyauthors.com/suppinfo
Please note that the provision of supporting information is not encouraged as a general rule. It will be assessed critically by reviewers and editors and will only be accepted if it is essential.
COPYRIGHT, LICENSING AND ONLINE OPEN
Accepted papers will be passed to Wiley’s production team for publication. The author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Wiley’s Author Services, where via the Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS) they will be asked to complete an electronic license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.
Authors may choose to publish under the terms of the journal’s standard copyright transfer agreement (CTA), or under open access terms made available via Wiley OnlineOpen.
Standard Copyright Transfer Agreement: FAQs about the terms and conditions of the standard CTA in place for the journal, including standard terms regarding archiving of the accepted version of the paper, are available at: Copyright Terms and Conditions FAQs.
Note that in signing the journal’s licence agreement authors agree that consent to reproduce figures from another source has been obtained.
OnlineOpen – Wiley’s Open Access Option: OnlineOpen is available to authors of articles who wish to make their article freely available to all on Wiley Online Library under a Creative Commons license. With OnlineOpen, the author, the author's funding agency, or the author's institution pays a fee to ensure that the article is made open access. Authors of OnlineOpen articles are permitted to post the final, published PDF of their article on their personal website, and in an institutional repository or other free public server immediately after publication. All OnlineOpen articles are treated in the same way as any other article. They go through the journal's standard peer-review process and will be accepted or rejected based on their own merit.
OnlineOpen licenses. Authors choosing OnlineOpen retain copyright in their article and have a choice of publishing under the following Creative Commons License terms: Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY); Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY NC); Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs License (CC BY NC ND). To preview the terms and conditions of these open access agreements please visit the Copyright Terms and Conditions FAQs.
Funder Open Access and Self-Archiving Compliance: Please click here for more information on Wiley’s compliance with specific Funder Open Access and Self Archiving Policies, and click here for more detailed information specifically about Self-Archiving definitions and policies.
EDITORIAL OFFICE CONTACT DETAILS
Alison Bell, Editorial Office, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
155 Cremorne Street
Richmond, Victoria 3121
Email: email@example.com; tel: 61 3 9274 3132
Guidelines updated 9 June 2015