© World Obesity Federation
Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities, with particular emphasis on immediate relevance to treatment of patients and understanding of human obesity. Our reviews and perspectives focus on clinical management and putting translational research into context for practitioners. The journal also serves as a forum for discussion of policy, practice, and ethics. Papers reporting regional or local prevalence data will not be accepted unless linked to new clinical findings. Clinical Obesity is the official clinical journal of the World Obesity Federation.
Submission is considered on the conditions that papers are previously unpublished, and are not offered simultaneously elsewhere; that all authors have read and approved the content, and all authors have also declared all competing interests; and that the work complies with the Ethical Policies of the journal, and has been conducted under internationally accepted ethical standards after relevant ethical review. It is highly recommended you read this policy and complete any necessary documentation prior to your submission.
This journal employs a plagiarism detection system. By submitting your manuscript to this journal you accept that your manuscript may be screened for plagiarism against previously published works.
EDITORIAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Acceptance of papers is based on the originality of the observation or investigation, the quality of the work described, the clarity of presentation, and the relevance to our readership. When submitting a manuscript it is with the understanding that the manuscript (or its essential substance) has not been published other than as an abstract in any language or format and has not been submitted elsewhere for print or electronic publication consideration.
The journal operates a stringent peer review process. All manuscripts will be reviewed by the Editors, members of the Editorial Board, or other expert reviewers. At the discretion of the Editors, the manuscript may be returned immediately without full review, if deemed not competitive or outside the realm of interests of the majority of the readership of the Journal. The decision (reject, invite revision, accept) letter will be conveyed through Clinical Obesity ScholarOne Manuscripts, coming directly from the Editor who has assumed responsibility for the manuscript's review. Editorial decisions are based not just on technical merit of the work, but also on other factors such as the priority for publication and the relevance to the Journal's general readership. All papers are judged in relation to other submissions currently under consideration. Rebuttals to rejected manuscripts are strongly discouraged and requests for resubmission of rejected manuscripts are generally not granted.
Publication ethics. Clinical Obesity is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics and subscribes to its recommendations (Committee on Publication Ethics [COPE]: guidelines on good publication practice, www.publicationethics.org.uk). Our Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: A Publisher's Perspective. Second Edition are available at http://exchanges.wiley.com/ethicsguidelines. The Editors reserve the right to reject a paper on ethical grounds. All authors are responsible for adhering to guidelines on good publication practice.
No paper can be published in the Journal unless it meets all of these requirements.
The corresponding author must provide an e-mail address for communication with the Editors and the Publisher.
The guidelines listed below should be followed where appropriate and where applicable, checklists, and flow diagrams uploaded with your submission; these may be published alongside the final version of your paper.
- CONSORT Statement (for reporting of randomised controlled trials: please use the appropriate extension to the CONSORT statement, including the extension for writing abstracts)
- COREQ (for reporting qualitative research)
- STARD (for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies)
- STROBE (for reporting of observational studies in epidemiology)
- PRISMA (for reporting of systematic reviews)
- PRISMA-P (for reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis protocols)
- MOOSE (for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies)
- SPIRIT (for reporting protocols for RCTs)
- STREGA (for reporting of gene-disease association studies)
- CHEERS (for reporting of health economic evaluations)
Authors must provide their entire manuscript in electronic format. Articles should be typed double-spaced, and may be up to the equivalent of 8-10 printed pages, i.e. the text plus references should not exceed 5000 words (this does not include tables, figures and their legends). Manuscripts exceeding this length are likely to be reduced during the revision process to less than 5,000 words.
General advice about the presentation of manuscripts:
- Provide a clear, concise and interesting title, and abstract, this helps readers quickly see the value of your work.
- The full contact details of the corresponding author must be included on the title page and the covering letter.
- All pages should be numbered.
- Avoid, as much as possible, the use of abbreviations.
- All scientific units should be expressed in SI units.
- Authors should use person first language: e.g., "patients with obesity" rather than "obese patients". See http://www.obesityaction.org/weight-bias-and-stigma/people-first-language-for-obesity for further information.
- Read these Author Guidelines carefully and follow them as closely as you can.
The title page should contain: (1) the title of the article, (2) the name of each author (first name and surname preferred), (3) the name of the department(s) and institution(s) to which the authors belong, (4) three to six keywords, (5) a running title, (6) full address including e-mail of the corresponding author.
Original research papers should be divided into (1) ‘What is already known about this subject’ and ‘What this study adds’ (up to three short bullet points each), (2) abstract (about 200 words), (3) introduction, (4) materials and methods, (5) results, (6) discussion, (7) conflicts of interest statement, (8) acknowledgements (including author contributions), (9) references.
For guidance on the content and style of the introduction, materials and methods, results and discussion, please follow the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICJME) Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: http://www.icmje.org/manuscript_1prepare.html
Reviews should be divided into: (1) abstract (about 200 words), (2) introduction, (3) text subdivided into paragraphs, (4) conclusion or discussion, (5) conflicts of interest statement, (6) author contributions, (7) acknowledgements, (8) references. Review authors are particularly encouraged to use tables, diagrams and figures. Personal conclusions and practical applications are welcome.
Abbreviations should be explained at the beginning of the manuscript and listed in the order in which they appear. Avoid abbreviations in the title and in the abstract.
Generic names should, in general, be used. If an author so desires, brand names may be inserted in parentheses.
This section should outline the contribution of each author to the manuscript e.g.: study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, literature search, generation of figures, writing of the manuscript. An example that authors might like to follow is:
XY and NM conceived and carried out experiments, AB and GH conceived experiments and analysed data. OP carried out experiments. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.
Any contributors who did not meet the authorship criteria should also be listed, such as colleagues who provided only technical support, writing assistance or general support. Financial and material support must always be acknowledged, with a clear statement defining all funding sources. This should include grants, equipment, drugs and other reagents, or gifts of materials.
References should be cited numerically in the order they appear in the text. Identify references in text, tables and legends by Arabic numerals in parentheses or as superscripts; authors of unpublished work which has not yet been accepted for publication must be included in the text only (e.g. J-P Després & MJ Stock - unpublished data). Please give the names of all authors, unless there are 7 or more authors, in which case, please list only the first 3 authors, followed by et al. References should be listed and journal titles abbreviated according to the style used by Index Medicus; examples are given below.
Examples of journal references:
- Castonguay TW, Dallman MF, Stern JS. Some metabolic and behavioural effects of adrenalectomy in obese Zucker rats. Am J Physiol 1986; 251: R923-R933.
- Cann PA, Rovati LC, Smart H, Spiller RC, Whorwell PJ. Loxiglumide, a CCK-A antagonist, in irritable bowel syndrome: a pilot multicentre clinical study (Abstract). Gastroent 1993; 104: A486.
- Maher VMG, Thompson GR. Analysis of evidence from cholesterol-lowering and regression trials. J Drug Dev Suppl 1990; 3/1: 199-203.
- Lissner L, Bengtsson C, Lapidus L, Larson B, Bengtsson B, Brownell KD. Body weight variability and mortality in the Gothenburg Prospective Studies on men and women. In: Bjorntorp P, Rossner S (eds). Obesity in Europe 88: Proceedings of the First European Congress on Obesity. Libbey: London, 1989, pp 55-60.
- Paul AA, Southgate DAT (eds) McCance and Widdowson's The composition of foods. 4th edn. HMSO: London, 1978.
- National Research Council. Diet and health, National Academy Press: Washington DC 1989.
- Beckleheimer, J. (1994). How do you cite URLs in a bibliography? [WWW document]. URL http://www.nrlssc.navy.mil/meta/bibliography.html
We recommend the use of a tool such as EndNote for reference management and formatting.
EndNote style files can be found here: http://www.endnote.com/support/enstyles.asp
Type each table on a separate page following on from the main text; number tables consecutively and supply a brief title and legend for each. Cite each table in the text in consecutive order, using Arabic numbers.
Artwork must be supplied in electronic form, as separate files per figure. Please save vector graphics (e.g. line artwork) in Encapsulated Postscript Format (EPS), and bitmap files (e.g. half-tones) in Tagged Image File Format (TIFF). Detailed information on our digital illustration standards is available at: http://media.wiley.com/assets/7323/92/electronic_artwork_guidelines.pdf. Letters, numbers and symbols should be clear and even throughout, and of sufficient size so that when reduced for publication the item will still be legible; titles and detailed explanations should be included in the legends, not in the illustrations themselves. Cite each figure in the text in consecutive order.
If a figure has been previously published, acknowledge the original source and submit written permission from the copyright holder to reproduce the material. For this, please use our official Permission Request Form.
It is the policy of Clinical Obesity for authors to pay the full cost for the reproduction of their colour artwork. Therefore, please note that if there is colour artwork in your manuscript when it is accepted for publication, Blackwell Publishing require you to complete and return a Colour Work agreement form before your paper can be published. This form can be downloaded as a PDF from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/(ISSN)1758-8111/homepages/COB__CWA_Form_2015.pdf
Once completed, please return the form to the Production Editor at the address below:
Any article received with colour figures, but without a Colour Work agreement form, will not be published until the form has been returned.
Please note that this policy does not apply to invited reviews, in which the use of colour is free of charge.
Table and figure legends
Legends for tables and figures should be typed on a separate page following on from the main text, with Arabic numbers corresponding to the numbers assigned to the matching figure or table (Table 1: …, Table 2: …, Figure 1: … etc.). When symbols, arrows, numbers or letters are used to identify parts of the illustrations, explain each one in the legend. Explain the internal scale and identify the method of staining in photomicrographs.
Online Supporting Information can include additional explanatory notes, data sets, lists, figures or tables that will not be published in the print edition of the journal and which are ancillary to, rather than central to, the article. Supporting Information must be approved by the Editor and should be supplied as a single PDF file headed by the title of the paper and the authors' names, addresses and contact information. Supporting Information will be published exactly as supplied and it is the author's responsibility to ensure that the material is logically laid out, adequately described, and in a format accessible to readers. Animations and other moving images or sound files in standard formats must be supplied as separate files. Figures and tables in Supporting Information should be referred to in the main text and labelled Figure S1, Figure S2, or Table S1, etc., in the order cited. Full guidelines and information on acceptable file formats may be found at: http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/suppmat.asp.
Articles (in English) should be submitted via our electronic system at: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cob. Please supply along with your manuscript files, forms (see below) and covering letter, the email address of each listed author.
All listed authors must complete an ICMJE COI disclosure form. The submitting author must collect all of these forms and each completed form must be scanned and submitted along with the manuscript. A Conflicts of Interest Statement including all of the information disclosed on the forms must be included in the manuscript, in a section placed after the discussion and before the acknowledgements.
If the manuscript contains a figure, table or quoted text that has been previously published, written permission to reproduce the material must be obtained from the copyright holder using the official Permission Request Form. The completed form should be scanned and submitted along with the manuscript.
The review process
All articles are subjected to full peer review. Comments and requests from the reviewers and Editor will be sent to the corresponding author. The authors then edit the article and submit it in revised form, providing clear details of the changes made and any responses to the comments. The revised version will be considered by the Editor, and if necessary, by the reviewers, before a final decision is made. The Editors retain the right to modify the style and length of a contribution (major changes being agreed with the corresponding author), and to decide the time of publication. Proof editing should be kept to a minimum.
OnlineOpen is available to authors of primary research articles who wish to make their article available to non-subscribers on publication, or whose funding agency requires grantees to archive the final version of their article. With OnlineOpen the author, the author's funding agency, or the author's institution pays a fee to ensure that the article is made available to non-subscribers upon publication vis Wiley Online Library, as well as deposited in the funding agency's preferred archive. For the full list of terms and conditions, click here.
Prior to acceptance, there is no requirement to inform the Editorial Office that you intend to publish your paper OnlineOpen if you do not wish to. All OnlineOpen articles are treated in the same way as any other article. They go through the Journal's standard peer-review process and will be accepted or rejected based on their own merit. Any authors wishing to send their paper OnlineOpen will be required to complete a payment form and Creative Commons License Open Access Agreement via the Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS).
If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS) they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.
For authors signing the copyright transfer agreement
If the OnlineOpen option is not selected the corresponding author will be presented with the copyright transfer agreement (CTA) to sign. The terms and conditions of the CTA can be previewed in the samples associated with the Copyright FAQs below:
CTA Terms and Conditions http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp
For authors choosing OnlineOpen
If the OnlineOpen option is selected the corresponding author will have a choice of the following Creative Commons License Open Access Agreements (OAA):
Creative Commons Attribution License OAA
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License OAA
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial -NoDerivs License OAA
To preview the terms and conditions of these open access agreements please visit the Copyright FAQs hosted on Wiley Author Services http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp and visit http://www.wileyopenaccess.com/details/content/12f25db4c87/Copyright--License.html.
If you select the OnlineOpen option and your research is funded by The Wellcome Trust and members of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) you will be given the opportunity to publish your article under a CC-BY license supporting you in complying with Wellcome Trust and Research Councils UK requirements. For more information on this policy and the Journal’s compliant self-archiving policy please visit: http://www.wiley.com/go/funderstatement.
Online production tracking via Author Services
Author Services enables authors to track their accepted article through the production process to publication online and in print. Authors can check the status of their articles online and choose to receive automated e-mails at key stages of production. The author will receive an e-mail with a unique link that enables them to register and have their article automatically added to the system. Please ensure that a complete e-mail address is provided when submitting the manuscript. Visit http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor for more details on online production tracking and for a wealth of resources including FAQs and tips on article preparation, submission and more.
The corresponding author will receive an email alert containing a link to the online proofs. A working e-mail address must therefore be provided for the corresponding author. The proof can be downloaded as a PDF (portable document format) file from the site. Acrobat Reader is needed to read the file, this software can be downloaded (free of charge) from:
This will enable the file to be opened, read on screen and printed out in order for any corrections to be added. Further instructions will be sent with the proof email. Hardcopy proofs will be posted if no e-mail address is available. Excessive changes made by the author in the proofs (excluding the correction of typesetting errors) will be charged separately.
PDF offprints will be available for download through Author Services once an article has been published in print. Paper offprints may be ordered online, but please note that the cost is higher if the order arrives too late for the main print run, so these orders are best placed around the time of checking proofs. Offprints are normally despatched within three weeks of publication of the issue in which the paper appears. Please contact the Publishers if offprints do not arrive: however, please note that offprints are sent surface mail, so overseas orders may take up to six weeks to arrive.
Storage of author submitted materials
Please note that Blackwell Publishing will dispose of all hardcopy or electronic material submitted by authors 2 months after publication.