<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://onlinelibrarystatic.wiley.com/xslt/wol-journal-rss.xsl"
            type="text/xsl"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/rss/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Journal of Organizational Behavior</title><description> Wiley Online Library : Journal of Organizational Behavior</description><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F%28ISSN%291099-1379</link><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en</dc:language><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">© John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</dc:rights><prism:issn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">0894-3796</prism:issn><prism:eIssn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1099-1379</prism:eIssn><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><prism:coverDisplayDate xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">February 2012</prism:coverDisplayDate><prism:volume xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">33</prism:volume><prism:number xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">2</prism:number><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">151</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">300</prism:endingPage><image rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/job.v33.2/asset/cover.gif?v=1&amp;s=b97eaff55123000ce248a2e707a29905c5ba6d5f"/><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1785"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1784"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1780"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1777"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1776"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1778"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1773"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1779"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1774"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1781"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1772"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1771"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.788"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.785"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.787"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.780"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.783"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.781"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.779"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.772"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.778"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.777"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.763"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.774"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.769"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.773"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.775"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.766"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.776"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.765"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.771"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.768"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.759"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.762"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.761"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.764"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.742"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.743"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.754"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.755"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.756"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.760"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.784"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1785" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Measuring implicit psychological constructs in organizational behavior: An example using psychological capital</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1785</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Measuring implicit psychological constructs in organizational behavior: An example using psychological capital</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter D. Harms</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Luthans</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-06T13:37:31.031916-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1785</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1785</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1785</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">The Incubator</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Implicit psychological constructs are effective predictors of behavioral outcomes but are rarely used in organizational settings because of real or imagined problems with measurement validity and administration. To address these concerns, we present a means of assessing implicit constructs quickly and easily by using psychological capital as an example. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Implicit psychological constructs are effective predictors of behavioral outcomes but are rarely used in organizational settings because of real or imagined problems with measurement validity and administration. To address these concerns, we present a means of assessing implicit constructs quickly and easily by using psychological capital as an example. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1784" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1784</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michaéla C. Schippers</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Astrid C. Homan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daan Knippenberg</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-03T01:39:16.466946-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1784</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1784</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1784</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A small but growing body of literature adds to our understanding of the role of team reflexivity (i.e., reflecting upon team functioning) in predicting team performance. Although many studies conclude that reflexivity is an asset for teams, the contingencies of team reflexivity have received far less research attention. In this respect, we argue that team reflexivity may be especially helpful for teams with relatively low performance. Teams that are reflexive tend to learn from previous mistakes, errors, and group processes, which in turn will improve the performance of the team. We propose that this relationship will most likely positively affect learning and final team performance under conditions of relatively poor prior performance. When a team is doing relatively well, the relationship between reflexivity and final team performance will be less clear, as reflexivity and learning is less needed. In a longitudinal study (<em>N</em> = 73 teams), we found support for this idea. As predicted, results indicated that this interaction between team reflexivity and initial team performance on future performance was mediated by team learning. We outline how these findings are important for our understanding of the contingencies of team reflexivity and team performance dynamics. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>A small but growing body of literature adds to our understanding of the role of team reflexivity (i.e., reflecting upon team functioning) in predicting team performance. Although many studies conclude that reflexivity is an asset for teams, the contingencies of team reflexivity have received far less research attention. In this respect, we argue that team reflexivity may be especially helpful for teams with relatively low performance. Teams that are reflexive tend to learn from previous mistakes, errors, and group processes, which in turn will improve the performance of the team. We propose that this relationship will most likely positively affect learning and final team performance under conditions of relatively poor prior performance. When a team is doing relatively well, the relationship between reflexivity and final team performance will be less clear, as reflexivity and learning is less needed. In a longitudinal study (N = 73 teams), we found support for this idea. As predicted, results indicated that this interaction between team reflexivity and initial team performance on future performance was mediated by team learning. We outline how these findings are important for our understanding of the contingencies of team reflexivity and team performance dynamics. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1780" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Bridge building within the province of proactivity</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1780</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bridge building within the province of proactivity</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerry Bryan Fuller</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura E. Marler</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim Hester</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-26T02:06:01.79687-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1780</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1780</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1780</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The research questions posed in this study highlight the importance of valuing proactivity in both prompting an individual to engage in proactive behavior and encouraging the expression of that behavior. We integrate a variety of constructs from the proactivity literature to gain a deeper understanding of proactive behavior as it relates to proactive motivation and supervisory performance evaluations. First, we draw upon self-determination theory, expectancy–value theory, and the recent integration of the proactive motivation literature to hypothesize that proactive behavior is predicted by the interaction of “can do” and “reason to” proactive motivational states. Second, on the basis of performance theory, we hypothesize that the relationship between proactive behavior and performance depends upon the extent to which the supervisor values proactivity. Specifically, we argue that supervisors with proactive personalities are more likely to value and reward subordinate proactive behavior than passive supervisors. Results provide support for both of our hypotheses. Interestingly, results show that proactive behavior did not result in negative consequences but rather that there was a cost (i.e., lower performance rating) for <em>not</em> taking charge for employees with proactive supervisors. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The research questions posed in this study highlight the importance of valuing proactivity in both prompting an individual to engage in proactive behavior and encouraging the expression of that behavior. We integrate a variety of constructs from the proactivity literature to gain a deeper understanding of proactive behavior as it relates to proactive motivation and supervisory performance evaluations. First, we draw upon self-determination theory, expectancy–value theory, and the recent integration of the proactive motivation literature to hypothesize that proactive behavior is predicted by the interaction of “can do” and “reason to” proactive motivational states. Second, on the basis of performance theory, we hypothesize that the relationship between proactive behavior and performance depends upon the extent to which the supervisor values proactivity. Specifically, we argue that supervisors with proactive personalities are more likely to value and reward subordinate proactive behavior than passive supervisors. Results provide support for both of our hypotheses. Interestingly, results show that proactive behavior did not result in negative consequences but rather that there was a cost (i.e., lower performance rating) for not taking charge for employees with proactive supervisors. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1777" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Finding the right mix: How the composition of self-managing multicultural teams' cultural value orientation influences performance over time</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1777</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Finding the right mix: How the composition of self-managing multicultural teams' cultural value orientation influences performance over time</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chi-Ying Cheng</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roy Y. J. Chua</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael W. Morris</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leonard Lee</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-18T23:05:35.955433-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1777</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1777</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1777</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Special Issue Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This research investigates a new type of team that is becoming prevalent in global work settings, namely self-managing multicultural teams. We argue that challenges that arise from cultural diversity in teams are exacerbated when teams are leaderless, undermining performance. A longitudinal study of multicultural master of business administration study teams found that in the early stage of team formation, teams with a low average level of, but moderate degree of variance in, uncertainty avoidance performed best. Four months post formation, however, teams with a high average level of relationship orientation performed better than teams with a low average level of relationship orientation. Furthermore, a moderate degree of variance in relationship orientation among team members produced better team performance than a low or high degree of variance. These findings suggest that different cultural value orientations exert different patterns of effects on the performance of self-managing multicultural teams, depending on the stage of team formation. We discuss implications for the composition of self-managing multicultural teams and its influence on team processes and performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This research investigates a new type of team that is becoming prevalent in global work settings, namely self-managing multicultural teams. We argue that challenges that arise from cultural diversity in teams are exacerbated when teams are leaderless, undermining performance. A longitudinal study of multicultural master of business administration study teams found that in the early stage of team formation, teams with a low average level of, but moderate degree of variance in, uncertainty avoidance performed best. Four months post formation, however, teams with a high average level of relationship orientation performed better than teams with a low average level of relationship orientation. Furthermore, a moderate degree of variance in relationship orientation among team members produced better team performance than a low or high degree of variance. These findings suggest that different cultural value orientations exert different patterns of effects on the performance of self-managing multicultural teams, depending on the stage of team formation. We discuss implications for the composition of self-managing multicultural teams and its influence on team processes and performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1776" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1776</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Taemie Kim</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erin McFee</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Olguin Olguin</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Waber</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex “Sandy” Pentland</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-18T01:47:47.262843-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1776</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1776</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1776</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Special Issue Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article introduces sociometric badges as a research tool that captures with great accuracy fine-scale speech patterns and body movements among a group of individuals at a scale that heretofore has been impossible in groups and teams studies. Such a tool offers great potential for studying the changing ecology of team structures and new modes of collaboration. Team boundaries are blurring as members disperse across multiple cultures, convene through various media, and operate in new configurations. As the how and why of collaboration evolves, an opportunity emerges to reassess the methods used to capture these interactions and to identify new tools that might help us create synergies across existing approaches to teams research. We offer sociometric badges as a complement to existing data collection methods—one that is well-positioned to capture real-time collaboration in new forms of teams. Used as one component in a multi-method approach, sociometric badges can capture what an observer or cross-sectional survey might miss, contributing to a more accurate understanding of group dynamics in new teams. We also revisit traditional teams research to suggest how we might use these badges to tackle long-standing challenges. We conclude with three case studies demonstrating potential applications of these sociometric badges. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This article introduces sociometric badges as a research tool that captures with great accuracy fine-scale speech patterns and body movements among a group of individuals at a scale that heretofore has been impossible in groups and teams studies. Such a tool offers great potential for studying the changing ecology of team structures and new modes of collaboration. Team boundaries are blurring as members disperse across multiple cultures, convene through various media, and operate in new configurations. As the how and why of collaboration evolves, an opportunity emerges to reassess the methods used to capture these interactions and to identify new tools that might help us create synergies across existing approaches to teams research. We offer sociometric badges as a complement to existing data collection methods—one that is well-positioned to capture real-time collaboration in new forms of teams. Used as one component in a multi-method approach, sociometric badges can capture what an observer or cross-sectional survey might miss, contributing to a more accurate understanding of group dynamics in new teams. We also revisit traditional teams research to suggest how we might use these badges to tackle long-standing challenges. We conclude with three case studies demonstrating potential applications of these sociometric badges. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1778" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Masters of the long haul: Pursuing long-term work goals</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1778</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Masters of the long haul: Pursuing long-term work goals</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas S. Bateman</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce Barry</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-18T01:46:47.808224-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1778</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1778</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1778</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We investigate work motivation in the unstudied domain of individuals who pursue very long-term goals. We highlight the fact that the preponderance of research findings on the psychology of work motivation is based on short-term studies and discuss the potential relevance to long-term motivation of literatures including long-term thinking and time horizons, long-term goals and goal pursuit, and self-regulation. We adopt the qualitative research strategy of theory elaboration, with a specific intention of elaborating goal-setting theory. Analysis of interview data from a unique sample of scientists and others pursuing goals spanning decades or more yielded a structure of psychological factors that can enhance, support, and sustain motivation for the long term. Reconciling our findings with existing goal theories, we develop an integrative model of motivating factors and self-regulation processes underlying long-term goal pursuit. We discuss the implications, including an expanded focus for our field on motivating people for the long run. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We investigate work motivation in the unstudied domain of individuals who pursue very long-term goals. We highlight the fact that the preponderance of research findings on the psychology of work motivation is based on short-term studies and discuss the potential relevance to long-term motivation of literatures including long-term thinking and time horizons, long-term goals and goal pursuit, and self-regulation. We adopt the qualitative research strategy of theory elaboration, with a specific intention of elaborating goal-setting theory. Analysis of interview data from a unique sample of scientists and others pursuing goals spanning decades or more yielded a structure of psychological factors that can enhance, support, and sustain motivation for the long term. Reconciling our findings with existing goal theories, we develop an integrative model of motivating factors and self-regulation processes underlying long-term goal pursuit. We discuss the implications, including an expanded focus for our field on motivating people for the long run. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1773" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1773</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Monica C. Higgins</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennie Weiner</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lissa Young</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-18T01:45:46.643733-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1773</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1773</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1773</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Special Issue Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This paper introduces a team form called an “implementation team”—a team charged with designing and leading the implementation of an organization-wide change strategy—and investigates this team type in a context ripe for change, U.S. public school systems. Unlike prior teams research that has focused on teams as diagnostic collectives or strategic decision-making bodies, this study forwards the notion that teams can be used to implement organizational change. In this study, we examined how positional and tenure diversity and work context relate to team member learning, a critical factor in sustaining organizational change. Results from 25 school district instructional improvement strategy teams over two years challenge some basic assumptions regarding what constitutes a “real team.” We find that some taken-for-granted aspects of teams, such as team member stability, may not be central or even appropriate when considering “real teams” in this change context; rather than stability of team membership, the stability of members' roles may matter most. We conclude by suggesting that scholars further investigate this team form and reframe, reconsider, and renew their conceptualizations of “real teams,” especially for teams engaged in implementing organizational change. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This paper introduces a team form called an “implementation team”—a team charged with designing and leading the implementation of an organization-wide change strategy—and investigates this team type in a context ripe for change, U.S. public school systems. Unlike prior teams research that has focused on teams as diagnostic collectives or strategic decision-making bodies, this study forwards the notion that teams can be used to implement organizational change. In this study, we examined how positional and tenure diversity and work context relate to team member learning, a critical factor in sustaining organizational change. Results from 25 school district instructional improvement strategy teams over two years challenge some basic assumptions regarding what constitutes a “real team.” We find that some taken-for-granted aspects of teams, such as team member stability, may not be central or even appropriate when considering “real teams” in this change context; rather than stability of team membership, the stability of members' roles may matter most. We conclude by suggesting that scholars further investigate this team form and reframe, reconsider, and renew their conceptualizations of “real teams,” especially for teams engaged in implementing organizational change. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1779" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Does process fairness affect job performance? It only matters if they plan to stay</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1779</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Does process fairness affect job performance? It only matters if they plan to stay</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian J. Collins</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin W. Mossholder</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shannon G. Taylor</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-18T01:45:21.889663-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1779</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1779</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1779</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Incorporating a social exchange perspective, we examined the joint impact of process fairness and turnover intentions on job performance. Results from two independent samples suggest that employee turnover intentions moderate relations between process fairness perceptions and employee job performance. Specifically, the positive effects of the two types of process fairness on performance were stronger for employees who planned to stay with the organization than for those who intended to leave. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Incorporating a social exchange perspective, we examined the joint impact of process fairness and turnover intentions on job performance. Results from two independent samples suggest that employee turnover intentions moderate relations between process fairness perceptions and employee job performance. Specifically, the positive effects of the two types of process fairness on performance were stronger for employees who planned to stay with the organization than for those who intended to leave. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1774" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>From causes to conditions in group research</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1774</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">From causes to conditions in group research</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J. Richard Hackman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-13T07:02:47.411111-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1774</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1774</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1774</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Special Issue Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>It is time to move beyond standard conceptual and research paradigms in scientific work on group behavior and performance to better align our models and methods with the phenomena we are studying. Cause–effect models are of limited use in conducting research and generating useable theory about group behavior and performance. This paper proposes and illustrates an alternative conceptual approach that focuses on the <em>conditions</em> within which groups chart their own courses. The paper suggests three implications of a condition-focused approach for those who create, lead, and serve in purposive groups, and closes with a discussion of the conceptual challenges that must be overcome if the potential of a condition-focused approach is to be realized. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>It is time to move beyond standard conceptual and research paradigms in scientific work on group behavior and performance to better align our models and methods with the phenomena we are studying. Cause–effect models are of limited use in conducting research and generating useable theory about group behavior and performance. This paper proposes and illustrates an alternative conceptual approach that focuses on the conditions within which groups chart their own courses. The paper suggests three implications of a condition-focused approach for those who create, lead, and serve in purposive groups, and closes with a discussion of the conceptual challenges that must be overcome if the potential of a condition-focused approach is to be realized. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1781" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A longitudinal study of mentor and protégé outcomes in formal mentoring relationships</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1781</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A longitudinal study of mentor and protégé outcomes in formal mentoring relationships</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jae Uk Chun</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John J. Sosik</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nam Yi Yun</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-13T07:02:25.418748-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1781</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1781</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1781</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This study examined relationships between mentoring functions offered and transformational leadership as a mentor outcome and affective well-being and organizational commitment as mutual outcomes for both mentors and protégés. For this examination, we conducted a longitudinal field study by using 111 matched reports from both mentors and protégés collected at three different points in time over seven months in nine Korean companies that administered a standardized formal mentoring program. Study results showed that mentoring functions assessed at Time 2 were positively associated with mentors' and protégés' post-mentoring outcomes at Time 3 after controlling for pre-mentoring initial levels of those outcomes at Time 1. Study findings also revealed that relative effects of mentoring on the mentor and protégé outcomes differed by the types of mentoring functions. We discuss the theoretical, practical, and methodological implications from these results. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This study examined relationships between mentoring functions offered and transformational leadership as a mentor outcome and affective well-being and organizational commitment as mutual outcomes for both mentors and protégés. For this examination, we conducted a longitudinal field study by using 111 matched reports from both mentors and protégés collected at three different points in time over seven months in nine Korean companies that administered a standardized formal mentoring program. Study results showed that mentoring functions assessed at Time 2 were positively associated with mentors' and protégés' post-mentoring outcomes at Time 3 after controlling for pre-mentoring initial levels of those outcomes at Time 1. Study findings also revealed that relative effects of mentoring on the mentor and protégé outcomes differed by the types of mentoring functions. We discuss the theoretical, practical, and methodological implications from these results. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1772" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1772</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. TRAVIS MAYNARD</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JOHN E. MATHIEU</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TAMMY L. RAPP</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LUCY L. GILSON</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-12T09:27:45.915515-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1772</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1772</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1772</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Special Issue Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We developed and tested a model that bridges existing team effectiveness theory with new ideas aimed at understanding the complexity of multiple team membership and virtuality. Using a sample of 60 global, virtual supply teams from a large multi-national organization, we propose that even for new team configurations, transactive memory systems and preparation activities are critical for effectiveness. We also examined the association between members' percentage of time allocated to a team, team virtuality, and interdependence on preparation activities. Our findings suggest that preparation activities related significantly to effectiveness as mediated by transactive memory systems. Furthermore, interdependence interacted with members' percentage of time allocated to the team as related to preparation activities. Specifically, members' percentage of time allocated to the team shifted from being a positive influence on preparation activities to a negative influence as team interdependence went from relatively high to relatively low levels. We discuss implications for theory, research, and practice. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We developed and tested a model that bridges existing team effectiveness theory with new ideas aimed at understanding the complexity of multiple team membership and virtuality. Using a sample of 60 global, virtual supply teams from a large multi-national organization, we propose that even for new team configurations, transactive memory systems and preparation activities are critical for effectiveness. We also examined the association between members' percentage of time allocated to a team, team virtuality, and interdependence on preparation activities. Our findings suggest that preparation activities related significantly to effectiveness as mediated by transactive memory systems. Furthermore, interdependence interacted with members' percentage of time allocated to the team as related to preparation activities. Specifically, members' percentage of time allocated to the team shifted from being a positive influence on preparation activities to a negative influence as team interdependence went from relatively high to relatively low levels. We discuss implications for theory, research, and practice. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1771" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees' needs as mediating links</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1771</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees' needs as mediating links</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snjezana Kovjanic</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sebastian C. Schuh</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Klaus Jonas</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niels Van Quaquebeke</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rolf Dick</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-09T15:07:30.920573-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.1771</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.1771</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.1771</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although followers' needs are a central aspect of transformational leadership theory, little is known about their role as mediating mechanisms for this leadership style. The present research thus seeks to integrate and extend theorizing on transformational leadership and self-determination. In particular, we propose that the satisfaction of followers' basic needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and employee outcomes (job satisfaction, self-efficacy, and commitment to the leader). We tested this model in two studies involving employees from a broad spectrum of organizations in Germany (<em>N</em> = 410) and in Switzerland (<em>N</em> = 442). Results revealed largely consistent patterns across both studies. The need for competence fulfillment solely mediated the link between transformational leadership and occupational self-efficacy; the need for relatedness fulfillment solely mediated the link between transformational leadership and commitment to the leader. The mediating pattern for the link between transformational leadership and job satisfaction varied slightly across studies. In Study 1, only the need for autonomy fulfillment was a significant mediator, whereas in Study 2, all three needs mediated this relationship. Taken together, our study integrates theorizing on transformational leadership and self-determination by corroborating that need fulfillment indeed is a central mechanism behind transformational leadership. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Although followers' needs are a central aspect of transformational leadership theory, little is known about their role as mediating mechanisms for this leadership style. The present research thus seeks to integrate and extend theorizing on transformational leadership and self-determination. In particular, we propose that the satisfaction of followers' basic needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and employee outcomes (job satisfaction, self-efficacy, and commitment to the leader). We tested this model in two studies involving employees from a broad spectrum of organizations in Germany (N = 410) and in Switzerland (N = 442). Results revealed largely consistent patterns across both studies. The need for competence fulfillment solely mediated the link between transformational leadership and occupational self-efficacy; the need for relatedness fulfillment solely mediated the link between transformational leadership and commitment to the leader. The mediating pattern for the link between transformational leadership and job satisfaction varied slightly across studies. In Study 1, only the need for autonomy fulfillment was a significant mediator, whereas in Study 2, all three needs mediated this relationship. Taken together, our study integrates theorizing on transformational leadership and self-determination by corroborating that need fulfillment indeed is a central mechanism behind transformational leadership. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.788" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Finding a good job: Academic network centrality and early occupational outcomes in management academia</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.788</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Finding a good job: Academic network centrality and early occupational outcomes in management academia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Hadani</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan Coombes</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diya Das</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Jalajas</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-28T09:41:26.948546-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.788</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.788</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.788</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The impact of universalistic versus particularistic criteria on academic hiring has been receiving growing attention in recent years. Yet, most studies conducted on hiring norms in academy and management academy have ignored the impact of social capital, particularly structural social capital, a particularistic attribute, on occupational outcomes. This could lead to a partial if not misleading view of the sociology of hiring in management academy. We utilize a novel approach, focusing on academic departments' structural social capital in the form of network centrality (based on cumulative PhD exchange networks), and explore how this type of centrality impacts job seekers' occupational prestige for new academic jobs in management departments and early career quality publications. We find that although merit-based criteria such as publications matter somewhat, academic network centrality explains significant variance in obtaining prestigious jobs. Paradoxically, we find that academic network centrality does not explain early career publications. We discuss the implications of our findings for management science. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The impact of universalistic versus particularistic criteria on academic hiring has been receiving growing attention in recent years. Yet, most studies conducted on hiring norms in academy and management academy have ignored the impact of social capital, particularly structural social capital, a particularistic attribute, on occupational outcomes. This could lead to a partial if not misleading view of the sociology of hiring in management academy. We utilize a novel approach, focusing on academic departments' structural social capital in the form of network centrality (based on cumulative PhD exchange networks), and explore how this type of centrality impacts job seekers' occupational prestige for new academic jobs in management departments and early career quality publications. We find that although merit-based criteria such as publications matter somewhat, academic network centrality explains significant variance in obtaining prestigious jobs. Paradoxically, we find that academic network centrality does not explain early career publications. We discuss the implications of our findings for management science. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.785" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A multilevel model of emotional skills, communication performance, and task performance in teams</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.785</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A multilevel model of emotional skills, communication performance, and task performance in teams</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ashlea C. Troth</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter J. Jordan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra A. Lawrence</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Herman H. M. Tse</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-21T02:30:34.399301-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.785</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.785</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.785</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>There is increasing research regarding the influence of emotions on teamwork. In this study, we use a multilevel approach to examine how team members' use of emotion-related skills affects team task performance and communication performance within the team. We measured individual self-reported emotional skills prior to team formation and then collected peer-rated individual communication performance and independently rated team task performance eight weeks later. Although there was no influence at the individual level between emotional skills and performance, team-level emotional skills positively predicted team task performance scores. At the cross level, team-level emotional skills predicted individual-level communication performance. These findings emphasize the importance of distinct team emotional skills in shaping both team performance and individual team member performance. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>There is increasing research regarding the influence of emotions on teamwork. In this study, we use a multilevel approach to examine how team members' use of emotion-related skills affects team task performance and communication performance within the team. We measured individual self-reported emotional skills prior to team formation and then collected peer-rated individual communication performance and independently rated team task performance eight weeks later. Although there was no influence at the individual level between emotional skills and performance, team-level emotional skills positively predicted team task performance scores. At the cross level, team-level emotional skills predicted individual-level communication performance. These findings emphasize the importance of distinct team emotional skills in shaping both team performance and individual team member performance. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.787" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.787</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Marie Ryan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Leah Wessel</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-25T06:19:37.237987-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.787</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.787</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.787</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Addendum</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.780" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance?</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.780</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mindy K. Shoss</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L. A. Witt</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dusya Vera</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-04T00:37:25.490471-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.780</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.780</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.780</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Adaptive performance is a facet of performance that reflects acquiring enhanced competencies in response to change. Micro-level researchers have assumed that adaptive performance is beneficial for task performance. Similarly, macro-level researchers have suggested that organizations need to attend to, monitor, and respond to contingencies in their environments for adaptive performance to be beneficial for firm performance. Drawing from the attention-based theory of the firm and resource theory, we suggest that perceptions of organizational politics and individual differences in conscientiousness constitute contingencies of the adaptive performance–task performance relationship. In a sample of 92 call center employees, we found that adaptive performance is positively associated with task performance but that conscientiousness and organizational politics jointly influence the adaptive performance–task performance relationship. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Adaptive performance is a facet of performance that reflects acquiring enhanced competencies in response to change. Micro-level researchers have assumed that adaptive performance is beneficial for task performance. Similarly, macro-level researchers have suggested that organizations need to attend to, monitor, and respond to contingencies in their environments for adaptive performance to be beneficial for firm performance. Drawing from the attention-based theory of the firm and resource theory, we suggest that perceptions of organizational politics and individual differences in conscientiousness constitute contingencies of the adaptive performance–task performance relationship. In a sample of 92 call center employees, we found that adaptive performance is positively associated with task performance but that conscientiousness and organizational politics jointly influence the adaptive performance–task performance relationship. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.783" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Individualism–collectivism and team member performance: Another look</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.783</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Individualism–collectivism and team member performance: Another look</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John A Wagner</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen E. Humphrey</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher J. Meyer</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John R. Hollenbeck</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-19T22:35:59.742379-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.783</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.783</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.783</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This study revisits the commonplace research conclusion that greater team member collectivism, as opposed to individualism, is associated with higher levels of individual-level performance in teams. Whereas this conclusion is based on the assumption that work in teams consists exclusively of tasks that are shared, typical teamwork also includes tasks that are individualized. Results of a laboratory study of 206 participants performing a mix of individualized and shared tasks in four-person teams indicate that heterogeneous combinations of individualism and collectivism are associated with higher levels of team member performance, measured as quantity of output, when loose structural interdependence enables individual differences in individualism–collectivism to exert meaningful effects. These results support the modified conclusion that a combination of individualism and collectivism is associated with higher levels of member performance in teams under typical work conditions; that is, conditions in which the tasks of individual members are both individualized and shared. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This study revisits the commonplace research conclusion that greater team member collectivism, as opposed to individualism, is associated with higher levels of individual-level performance in teams. Whereas this conclusion is based on the assumption that work in teams consists exclusively of tasks that are shared, typical teamwork also includes tasks that are individualized. Results of a laboratory study of 206 participants performing a mix of individualized and shared tasks in four-person teams indicate that heterogeneous combinations of individualism and collectivism are associated with higher levels of team member performance, measured as quantity of output, when loose structural interdependence enables individual differences in individualism–collectivism to exert meaningful effects. These results support the modified conclusion that a combination of individualism and collectivism is associated with higher levels of member performance in teams under typical work conditions; that is, conditions in which the tasks of individual members are both individualized and shared. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.781" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>No person is an island: The effects of group characteristics on individual trait expression</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.781</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">No person is an island: The effects of group characteristics on individual trait expression</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joseph A. Schmidt</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Babatunde Ogunfowora</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joshua S. Bourdage</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-15T04:27:05.217378-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.781</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.781</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.781</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although most researchers now espouse a person-by-situation interactionist approach, there remains much work to be carried out to fully understand how different features of the environment interact with personality to influence behavior. Thus, this study sought to examine the moderating effects of three group-level constructs on the relationships between two personality traits (conscientiousness and extraversion) and individual performance and counterproductive behaviors. Specifically, using trait activation theory as an organizing framework, we considered the moderating effects of the following: (i) a previously unexamined construct called core group evaluations (CGEs); (ii) group conscientiousness composition; and (iii) group extraversion composition. Data were obtained from a sample of university football players (<em>N</em> = 225–252 from 40 groups). The results indicated that CGEs moderated the relationships between individual conscientiousness and both performance (subjective) and counterproductive behaviors. Group conscientiousness composition also moderated the relationships between individual conscientiousness and both performance (objective and subjective) and counterproductive behaviors. Lastly, group extraversion composition moderated the relationship between individual extraversion and counterproductive behaviors. These findings highlight the importance of considering a team's CGEs, as well as the personality composition of team members when investigating the effects of conscientiousness and extraversion on individual performance and counterproductive behaviors. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Although most researchers now espouse a person-by-situation interactionist approach, there remains much work to be carried out to fully understand how different features of the environment interact with personality to influence behavior. Thus, this study sought to examine the moderating effects of three group-level constructs on the relationships between two personality traits (conscientiousness and extraversion) and individual performance and counterproductive behaviors. Specifically, using trait activation theory as an organizing framework, we considered the moderating effects of the following: (i) a previously unexamined construct called core group evaluations (CGEs); (ii) group conscientiousness composition; and (iii) group extraversion composition. Data were obtained from a sample of university football players (N = 225–252 from 40 groups). The results indicated that CGEs moderated the relationships between individual conscientiousness and both performance (subjective) and counterproductive behaviors. Group conscientiousness composition also moderated the relationships between individual conscientiousness and both performance (objective and subjective) and counterproductive behaviors. Lastly, group extraversion composition moderated the relationship between individual extraversion and counterproductive behaviors. These findings highlight the importance of considering a team's CGEs, as well as the personality composition of team members when investigating the effects of conscientiousness and extraversion on individual performance and counterproductive behaviors. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.779" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Context matters: Combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion focus–employee creativity relationship</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.779</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Context matters: Combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion focus–employee creativity relationship</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Qin Zhou</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Giles Hirst</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helen Shipton</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-31T05:53:46.733468-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.779</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.779</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.779</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In this paper, we examined the interactive effects of two contexts—participation and intellectual stimulation, and promotion focus on creativity. On the basis of a multi-organization sample of 213 employees, we tested and found that although promotion focus was positively related to creativity, the relationship between promotion focus and creativity was most positive when both participation and leader intellectual stimulation were high. We discuss the way contexts <em>in combination</em> influence employee creativity for promotion-oriented individuals, through increasing decision latitude as well as stimulating and promoting creativity. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>In this paper, we examined the interactive effects of two contexts—participation and intellectual stimulation, and promotion focus on creativity. On the basis of a multi-organization sample of 213 employees, we tested and found that although promotion focus was positively related to creativity, the relationship between promotion focus and creativity was most positive when both participation and leader intellectual stimulation were high. We discuss the way contexts in combination influence employee creativity for promotion-oriented individuals, through increasing decision latitude as well as stimulating and promoting creativity. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.772" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The emergence of team helping norms: Foundations within members' attributes and behavior</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.772</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The emergence of team helping norms: Foundations within members' attributes and behavior</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jana L. Raver</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark G. Ehrhart</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ingrid C. Chadwick</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-23T06:30:39.808891-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.772</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.772</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.772</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This research examined the antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior helping norms in teams, specifically with regard to how members' personality, values, beliefs, and helping behavior predict the emergence of helping norms in newly formed project teams. We drew from theory on emergent phenomena and team composition research to propose and test a compilation model of how helping norms are influenced by having at least one member with particularly <em>low</em> (minimum) or <em>high</em> (maximum) levels of attributes that may influence helping-norm development (i.e., conscientiousness, agreeableness, other-oriented values, personal helping beliefs). We further examined the extent to which members' helping behaviors, as rated by peers, predicted helping norms and whether these behaviors mediated the relationship between individual attributes and helping norms. The results of a longitudinal study of 47 student project teams revealed that teams' minimums on agreeableness, other-oriented values, and personal helping beliefs had direct relationships with helping-norm emergence, and the effects of agreeableness were mediated through mean helping behavior. By contrast, teams' maximums on these attributes showed no relationships with helping norms, and only a team maximum on agreeableness was associated with teams' mean helping behavior. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This research examined the antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior helping norms in teams, specifically with regard to how members' personality, values, beliefs, and helping behavior predict the emergence of helping norms in newly formed project teams. We drew from theory on emergent phenomena and team composition research to propose and test a compilation model of how helping norms are influenced by having at least one member with particularly low (minimum) or high (maximum) levels of attributes that may influence helping-norm development (i.e., conscientiousness, agreeableness, other-oriented values, personal helping beliefs). We further examined the extent to which members' helping behaviors, as rated by peers, predicted helping norms and whether these behaviors mediated the relationship between individual attributes and helping norms. The results of a longitudinal study of 47 student project teams revealed that teams' minimums on agreeableness, other-oriented values, and personal helping beliefs had direct relationships with helping-norm emergence, and the effects of agreeableness were mediated through mean helping behavior. By contrast, teams' maximums on these attributes showed no relationships with helping norms, and only a team maximum on agreeableness was associated with teams' mean helping behavior. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.778" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A meta-analysis of the interrelationships between employee lateness, absenteeism, and turnover: Implications for models of withdrawal behavior</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.778</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A meta-analysis of the interrelationships between employee lateness, absenteeism, and turnover: Implications for models of withdrawal behavior</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher M. Berry</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ariel M. Lelchook</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Malissa A. Clark</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-21T23:09:14.979662-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.778</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.778</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.778</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We meta-analyzed the correlations between voluntary employee lateness, absenteeism, and turnover to (i) provide the most comprehensive estimates to date of the interrelationships between these withdrawal behaviors; (ii) test the viability of a withdrawal construct; and (iii) evaluate the evidence for competing models of the relationships between withdrawal behaviors (i.e., alternate forms, compensatory forms, independent forms, progression of withdrawal, and spillover model). Corrected correlations were .26 between lateness and absenteeism, .25 between absenteeism and turnover, and .01 between lateness and turnover. These correlations were even smaller in recent studies that had been carried out since the previous meta-analyses of these relationships 15–20 years ago. The small-to-moderate intercorrelations are not supportive of a withdrawal construct that includes lateness, absenteeism, and turnover. These intercorrelations also rule out many of the competing models of the relationships between withdrawal behaviors, as many of the models assume all relationships will be positive, null, or negative. On the basis of path analyses using meta-analytic data, the progression of withdrawal model garnered the most support. This suggests that lateness may moderately predict absenteeism and absenteeism may moderately predict turnover. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We meta-analyzed the correlations between voluntary employee lateness, absenteeism, and turnover to (i) provide the most comprehensive estimates to date of the interrelationships between these withdrawal behaviors; (ii) test the viability of a withdrawal construct; and (iii) evaluate the evidence for competing models of the relationships between withdrawal behaviors (i.e., alternate forms, compensatory forms, independent forms, progression of withdrawal, and spillover model). Corrected correlations were .26 between lateness and absenteeism, .25 between absenteeism and turnover, and .01 between lateness and turnover. These correlations were even smaller in recent studies that had been carried out since the previous meta-analyses of these relationships 15–20 years ago. The small-to-moderate intercorrelations are not supportive of a withdrawal construct that includes lateness, absenteeism, and turnover. These intercorrelations also rule out many of the competing models of the relationships between withdrawal behaviors, as many of the models assume all relationships will be positive, null, or negative. On the basis of path analyses using meta-analytic data, the progression of withdrawal model garnered the most support. This suggests that lateness may moderately predict absenteeism and absenteeism may moderately predict turnover. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.777" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.777</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathon N. Cummings</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martine R. Haas</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-21T22:56:02.446647-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.777</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.777</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.777</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Special Issue Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Geographically dispersed teams whose members do not allocate all of their time to a single team increasingly carry out knowledge-intensive work in multinational organizations. Taking an attention-based view of team design, we investigate the antecedents and consequences of member time allocation in a multi-level study of 2055 members of 285 teams in a large global corporation, using member survey data and independent executive ratings of team performance. We focus on two distinct dimensions of time allocation: the proportion of members' time that is allocated to the focal team and the number of other teams to which the members allocate time concurrently. At the individual level, we find that time allocation is influenced by members' levels of experience, rank, education, and leader role on the team, as predicted. At the team level, performance is higher for teams whose members allocate a greater proportion of their time to the focal team, but surprisingly, performance is also higher for teams whose members allocate time to a greater number of other teams concurrently. Furthermore, the effects of member time allocation on team performance are contingent on geographic dispersion: the advantages of allocating more time to the focal team are greater for more dispersed teams, whereas the advantages of allocating time to more other teams are greater for less dispersed teams. We discuss the implications for future research on new forms of teams as well as managerial practice, including how to manage geographically dispersed teams with the effects of member time allocation in mind. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Geographically dispersed teams whose members do not allocate all of their time to a single team increasingly carry out knowledge-intensive work in multinational organizations. Taking an attention-based view of team design, we investigate the antecedents and consequences of member time allocation in a multi-level study of 2055 members of 285 teams in a large global corporation, using member survey data and independent executive ratings of team performance. We focus on two distinct dimensions of time allocation: the proportion of members' time that is allocated to the focal team and the number of other teams to which the members allocate time concurrently. At the individual level, we find that time allocation is influenced by members' levels of experience, rank, education, and leader role on the team, as predicted. At the team level, performance is higher for teams whose members allocate a greater proportion of their time to the focal team, but surprisingly, performance is also higher for teams whose members allocate time to a greater number of other teams concurrently. Furthermore, the effects of member time allocation on team performance are contingent on geographic dispersion: the advantages of allocating more time to the focal team are greater for more dispersed teams, whereas the advantages of allocating time to more other teams are greater for less dispersed teams. We discuss the implications for future research on new forms of teams as well as managerial practice, including how to manage geographically dispersed teams with the effects of member time allocation in mind. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.763" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Thriving at work—A diary study</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.763</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thriving at work—A diary study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cornelia Niessen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sabine Sonnentag</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Friederike Sach</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-11T09:27:00.814101-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.763</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.763</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.763</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The present diary study examines how employees thrive at work in response to resources (i.e., positive meaning, relational resources, and knowledge). Thriving is conceptualized as the joint experience of vitality and learning. A total of 121 employees working in the social services sector responded to three daily surveys (in the morning, at lunchtime, and at the end of the work day) for a period of five work days. Intra-individual analyses (hierarchical linear modeling) revealed that on days when employees experience positive meaning at work in the morning, they feel more vital at the end of the work day and have a higher sense of learning. Work behaviors such as task focus and exploration mediated the relation between positive meaning and both components of thriving. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The present diary study examines how employees thrive at work in response to resources (i.e., positive meaning, relational resources, and knowledge). Thriving is conceptualized as the joint experience of vitality and learning. A total of 121 employees working in the social services sector responded to three daily surveys (in the morning, at lunchtime, and at the end of the work day) for a period of five work days. Intra-individual analyses (hierarchical linear modeling) revealed that on days when employees experience positive meaning at work in the morning, they feel more vital at the end of the work day and have a higher sense of learning. Work behaviors such as task focus and exploration mediated the relation between positive meaning and both components of thriving. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.774" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>You cannot leave it at the office: Spillover and crossover of coworker incivility</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.774</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">You cannot leave it at the office: Spillover and crossover of coworker incivility</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Merideth Ferguson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-10T05:19:09.785699-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.774</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.774</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.774</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This study examines the spillover and crossover effects of a specific chronic stressor, coworker incivility, on target marital satisfaction, partner marital satisfaction, and partner family-to-work conflict and on how the transmission of stress from the workplace to the family domain (as perceived by the target's partner) mediates these relationships. Using a matched data set of 190 job incumbents and their partners, the findings reveal that coworker incivility demonstrates both spillover and crossover effects on these outcomes important to the family. Evidence indicates that incivility targets do not leave the stress of incivility at work but instead bring it home to the family domain where it influences relationships with and outcomes of their partners. Implications of these findings and avenues for future research are discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This study examines the spillover and crossover effects of a specific chronic stressor, coworker incivility, on target marital satisfaction, partner marital satisfaction, and partner family-to-work conflict and on how the transmission of stress from the workplace to the family domain (as perceived by the target's partner) mediates these relationships. Using a matched data set of 190 job incumbents and their partners, the findings reveal that coworker incivility demonstrates both spillover and crossover effects on these outcomes important to the family. Evidence indicates that incivility targets do not leave the stress of incivility at work but instead bring it home to the family domain where it influences relationships with and outcomes of their partners. Implications of these findings and avenues for future research are discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.769" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Multiple categorization in resume screening: Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab settings</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.769</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Multiple categorization in resume screening: Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab settings</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eva Derous</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Marie Ryan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hannah-Hanh D. Nguyen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-05T07:12:54.42295-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.769</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.769</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.769</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Debate exists as to what the more appropriate prediction is regarding the effects of multiple stigmatized group memberships on employment discrimination. The ethnic prominence (EP), multiple minority status (MMS), and subordinate male target hypotheses were assessed for the combined effects of ethnic group membership (Arabic), sex, social status, and job type on hiring evaluations. Two correspondence tests in the field (Study 1) and two experimental studies in the lab (Study 2) and in the field (Study 3) were conducted. Studies 1 and 2 showed evidence for the EP hypothesis when low-status jobs were tested. The odds for rejection were four times higher for Arab than for Dutch applicants. Applicants' sex, socio-economic status, and external client contact did not moderate findings (Study 1). The effect of applicants' ethnic group membership was further moderated by raters' motivation to control prejudice (Study 2). Study 3 showed evidence for the MMS hypothesis. We found double jeopardy against Arab women who applied for high-status jobs when recruiters' prejudice was controlled. Study findings show that discrimination in resume screening may depend upon the particular intersection of applicant, job, and recruiter characteristics. We discussed implications for anonymous resume screening and research on evaluation of applicants possessing multiple stigmatizing characteristics. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Debate exists as to what the more appropriate prediction is regarding the effects of multiple stigmatized group memberships on employment discrimination. The ethnic prominence (EP), multiple minority status (MMS), and subordinate male target hypotheses were assessed for the combined effects of ethnic group membership (Arabic), sex, social status, and job type on hiring evaluations. Two correspondence tests in the field (Study 1) and two experimental studies in the lab (Study 2) and in the field (Study 3) were conducted. Studies 1 and 2 showed evidence for the EP hypothesis when low-status jobs were tested. The odds for rejection were four times higher for Arab than for Dutch applicants. Applicants' sex, socio-economic status, and external client contact did not moderate findings (Study 1). The effect of applicants' ethnic group membership was further moderated by raters' motivation to control prejudice (Study 2). Study 3 showed evidence for the MMS hypothesis. We found double jeopardy against Arab women who applied for high-status jobs when recruiters' prejudice was controlled. Study findings show that discrimination in resume screening may depend upon the particular intersection of applicant, job, and recruiter characteristics. We discussed implications for anonymous resume screening and research on evaluation of applicants possessing multiple stigmatizing characteristics. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.773" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Linking workplace incivility to citizenship performance: The combined effects of affective commitment and conscientiousness</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.773</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linking workplace incivility to citizenship performance: The combined effects of affective commitment and conscientiousness</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shannon G. Taylor</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arthur G. Bedeian</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Donald H. Kluemper</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-05T06:55:27.360421-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.773</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.773</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.773</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although all human relationships are believed to generally adhere to the basic tenets of social exchange theory, recent research suggests that exchange processes may vary as a function of individual differences. We tested this possibility by examining whether the effects of uncivil workplace exchanges on employee attitudes and behavior were moderated by conscientiousness. Using matched data from 190 job incumbents and their supervisors, we found (i) the effect of workplace incivility on citizenship performance to be transmitted through affective commitment and (ii) the strength of this effect to depend on individual differences in conscientiousness. As such, the overall pattern of relationships supported moderated mediation, in that, the indirect effect of workplace incivility on citizenship performance through affective commitment was stronger for individuals high (as compared with those low) in conscientiousness. These findings broaden the focus of prior research by illustrating that, in addition to the mediating effects of cognitive and stress-based factors, social exchange processes are important for understanding incivility's adverse effects on citizenship performance and that such exchanges are moderated by individual differences in conscientiousness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Although all human relationships are believed to generally adhere to the basic tenets of social exchange theory, recent research suggests that exchange processes may vary as a function of individual differences. We tested this possibility by examining whether the effects of uncivil workplace exchanges on employee attitudes and behavior were moderated by conscientiousness. Using matched data from 190 job incumbents and their supervisors, we found (i) the effect of workplace incivility on citizenship performance to be transmitted through affective commitment and (ii) the strength of this effect to depend on individual differences in conscientiousness. As such, the overall pattern of relationships supported moderated mediation, in that, the indirect effect of workplace incivility on citizenship performance through affective commitment was stronger for individuals high (as compared with those low) in conscientiousness. These findings broaden the focus of prior research by illustrating that, in addition to the mediating effects of cognitive and stress-based factors, social exchange processes are important for understanding incivility's adverse effects on citizenship performance and that such exchanges are moderated by individual differences in conscientiousness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.775" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.775</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wei-Chi Tsai</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nai-Wen Chi</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alicia A. Grandey</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sy-Chi Fung</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-05T06:50:39.566258-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.775</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.775</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.775</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Drawing on multiple group-level theories, we explored boundary conditions of the relationship between positive group affective tone (PGAT) and team creativity. We collected data from members and leaders of 68 research and development teams and performed hierarchical linear modeling analyses to test our hypotheses. Consistent with the “group-centrism” perspective, we found that PGAT was <em>beneficial</em> for team creativity only when team trust was <em>low</em>; when trust was <em>high</em>, PGAT had a <em>negative</em> relationship with team creativity. In accord with the “dual-tuning” perspective, the positive effect of PGAT on creativity was present only when team trust was <em>low</em> but negative group affective tone was <em>high</em>. We discussed the theoretical and practical implications. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Drawing on multiple group-level theories, we explored boundary conditions of the relationship between positive group affective tone (PGAT) and team creativity. We collected data from members and leaders of 68 research and development teams and performed hierarchical linear modeling analyses to test our hypotheses. Consistent with the “group-centrism” perspective, we found that PGAT was beneficial for team creativity only when team trust was low; when trust was high, PGAT had a negative relationship with team creativity. In accord with the “dual-tuning” perspective, the positive effect of PGAT on creativity was present only when team trust was low but negative group affective tone was high. We discussed the theoretical and practical implications. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.766" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A moderated mediation test of personality, coping, and health among deployed soldiers</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.766</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A moderated mediation test of personality, coping, and health among deployed soldiers</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Chunyan Peng</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura T. Riolli</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Schaubroeck</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Everett S. P. Spain</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-05T06:43:31.341062-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.766</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.766</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.766</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Our study examines how personality and coping influence soldiers' psychological health among 648 US Army personnel who were at that time deployed in Iraq at the height of an insurgency. Conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extraversion were associated with different coping behaviors, and these were in turn related to psychological distress. Conscientiousness was positively associated with problem-focused coping and negatively with avoidance coping, whereas neuroticism was most positively associated with avoidance coping. Extraversion was positively related to both seeking social support and avoidance coping. As expected, avoidance coping was positively associated with psychological distress. Coping style explained more variance in the relationship between personality and distress among soldiers who perceived higher levels of threat, thus supporting a moderated mediation hypothesis. We discuss implications for facilitating the stress coping of workers who face acute and potentially traumatic stress exposures. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Our study examines how personality and coping influence soldiers' psychological health among 648 US Army personnel who were at that time deployed in Iraq at the height of an insurgency. Conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extraversion were associated with different coping behaviors, and these were in turn related to psychological distress. Conscientiousness was positively associated with problem-focused coping and negatively with avoidance coping, whereas neuroticism was most positively associated with avoidance coping. Extraversion was positively related to both seeking social support and avoidance coping. As expected, avoidance coping was positively associated with psychological distress. Coping style explained more variance in the relationship between personality and distress among soldiers who perceived higher levels of threat, thus supporting a moderated mediation hypothesis. We discuss implications for facilitating the stress coping of workers who face acute and potentially traumatic stress exposures. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.776" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Violence-prevention climate, exposure to violence and aggression, and prevention behavior: A mediation model</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.776</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Violence-prevention climate, exposure to violence and aggression, and prevention behavior: A mediation model</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chu-Hsiang Chang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erin M. Eatough</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul E. Spector</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stacey R. Kessler</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-08-05T06:40:28.473946-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.776</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.776</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.776</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This study explored mechanisms underlying employees' behaviors targeted at preventing workplace physical violence and verbal aggression. Poor psychological violence-prevention climate perceptions and previous exposure to violence and aggression represent stressors that were associated with increased strains and reduced motivation. Strains and motivation, in turn, were related to prevention behaviors. We collected data from employee and coworker dyads, and structural equation modeling results supported that clear organizational policies, prompt management responses to assaults, and putting safety as a priority contributed positively to prevention behaviors through reduced strains and increased motivation. On the other hand, prior experiences of being attacked were related to more strains and lower motivation, which were related to lower prevention compliance. Our results inform future interventions for violence prevention. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This study explored mechanisms underlying employees' behaviors targeted at preventing workplace physical violence and verbal aggression. Poor psychological violence-prevention climate perceptions and previous exposure to violence and aggression represent stressors that were associated with increased strains and reduced motivation. Strains and motivation, in turn, were related to prevention behaviors. We collected data from employee and coworker dyads, and structural equation modeling results supported that clear organizational policies, prompt management responses to assaults, and putting safety as a priority contributed positively to prevention behaviors through reduced strains and increased motivation. On the other hand, prior experiences of being attacked were related to more strains and lower motivation, which were related to lower prevention compliance. Our results inform future interventions for violence prevention. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.765" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.765</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Marie Ryan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Leah Wessel</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-07-27T09:06:25.366587-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.765</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.765</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.765</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Little is known about when and why observers of harassment incidents choose to intervene. On the basis of a model of observer intervention by Bowes-Sperry and O'Leary-Kelly (2005), we examined situational (directness of harassment, relationship to target, knowledge of target orientation, recurrence beliefs) variables as potential predictors of observer decisions to intervene when witnessing sexual orientation harassment. We also examined how costs and benefits analysis and recurrence beliefs relate to the level and immediacy of involvement. Relationship to the target, directness of the harassment, recurrence beliefs, knowledge of target orientation, and costs evidenced some connections to the nature of intervention. We discussed implications for organizations. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Little is known about when and why observers of harassment incidents choose to intervene. On the basis of a model of observer intervention by Bowes-Sperry and O'Leary-Kelly (2005), we examined situational (directness of harassment, relationship to target, knowledge of target orientation, recurrence beliefs) variables as potential predictors of observer decisions to intervene when witnessing sexual orientation harassment. We also examined how costs and benefits analysis and recurrence beliefs relate to the level and immediacy of involvement. Relationship to the target, directness of the harassment, recurrence beliefs, knowledge of target orientation, and costs evidenced some connections to the nature of intervention. We discussed implications for organizations. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.771" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The costs and benefits of working with one's spouse: A two-sample examination of spousal support, work–family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in work-linked relationships</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.771</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The costs and benefits of working with one's spouse: A two-sample examination of spousal support, work–family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in work-linked relationships</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony R. Wheeler</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ana Maria Rossi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-07-16T00:15:47.638741-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.771</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.771</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.771</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although the prevalence of employees working within the same workplace or occupation with their spouse has increased, relatively little research has examined their experiences. On the basis of the boundary and conservation of resources (COR) theories, we argue that higher levels of work–family role integration among work-linked couples will lead to higher levels of spousal support resources and lower levels of work–family conflict. This will, in turn, lead to lower emotional exhaustion among employees in a work-linked relationship. Among two samples of employees in a variety of occupations, we found that being in a work-linked relationship was associated with both higher spousal instrumental support as well as different forms of work–family conflict. The interaction between spousal support and work–family conflict was associated with emotional exhaustion. We discuss the implications of these findings for boundary and COR theories in terms of movement of resources across work–family boundaries and resource relevance in the strain process. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Although the prevalence of employees working within the same workplace or occupation with their spouse has increased, relatively little research has examined their experiences. On the basis of the boundary and conservation of resources (COR) theories, we argue that higher levels of work–family role integration among work-linked couples will lead to higher levels of spousal support resources and lower levels of work–family conflict. This will, in turn, lead to lower emotional exhaustion among employees in a work-linked relationship. Among two samples of employees in a variety of occupations, we found that being in a work-linked relationship was associated with both higher spousal instrumental support as well as different forms of work–family conflict. The interaction between spousal support and work–family conflict was associated with emotional exhaustion. We discuss the implications of these findings for boundary and COR theories in terms of movement of resources across work–family boundaries and resource relevance in the strain process. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.768" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.768</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erica Xu</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Xu Huang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Catherine K. Lam</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Qing Miao</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-07-16T00:13:49.959738-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.768</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.768</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.768</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We investigated the mediating role of the leader–member exchange (LMX) in the association of abusive supervision and employee work behaviors (task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors toward the organization and individuals). Using data collected from 366 supervisor–subordinate dyads, we found that LMX fully mediated the negative effects of abusive supervision on all three work behaviors. In addition, we conducted a supplementary study on the basis of the data collected from 54 supervisor–subordinate dyads from a garment company, and we found that LMX mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and employee objective future performance with interactional justice controlled. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We investigated the mediating role of the leader–member exchange (LMX) in the association of abusive supervision and employee work behaviors (task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors toward the organization and individuals). Using data collected from 366 supervisor–subordinate dyads, we found that LMX fully mediated the negative effects of abusive supervision on all three work behaviors. In addition, we conducted a supplementary study on the basis of the data collected from 54 supervisor–subordinate dyads from a garment company, and we found that LMX mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and employee objective future performance with interactional justice controlled. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.759" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.759</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael S. Cole</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heike Bruch</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernd Vogel</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-05-26T23:15:56.117119-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.759</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.759</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.759</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We introduce the notion that the energy of individuals can manifest as a higher-level, collective construct. To this end, we conducted four independent studies to investigate the viability and importance of the collective energy construct as assessed by a new survey instrument—the productive energy measure (PEM). Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 2208) included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to explore the underlying factor structure of PEM. Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 660) cross-validated the same factor structure in an independent sample. In study 3, we administered the PEM to more than 5000 employees from 145 departments located in five countries. Results from measurement invariance, statistical aggregation, convergent, and discriminant-validity assessments offered additional support for the construct validity of PEM. In terms of predictive and incremental validity, the PEM was positively associated with three collective attitudes—units' commitment to goals, the organization, and overall satisfaction. In study 4, we explored the relationship between the productive energy of firms and their overall performance. Using data from 92 firms (<em>n</em> = 5939<sub>employees</sub>), we found a positive relationship between the PEM (aggregated to the firm level) and the performance of those firms. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We introduce the notion that the energy of individuals can manifest as a higher-level, collective construct. To this end, we conducted four independent studies to investigate the viability and importance of the collective energy construct as assessed by a new survey instrument—the productive energy measure (PEM). Study 1 (n = 2208) included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to explore the underlying factor structure of PEM. Study 2 (n = 660) cross-validated the same factor structure in an independent sample. In study 3, we administered the PEM to more than 5000 employees from 145 departments located in five countries. Results from measurement invariance, statistical aggregation, convergent, and discriminant-validity assessments offered additional support for the construct validity of PEM. In terms of predictive and incremental validity, the PEM was positively associated with three collective attitudes—units' commitment to goals, the organization, and overall satisfaction. In study 4, we explored the relationship between the productive energy of firms and their overall performance. Using data from 92 firms (n = 5939employees), we found a positive relationship between the PEM (aggregated to the firm level) and the performance of those firms. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.762" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Introduction: General versus specific measures and the special case of core self-evaluations</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.762</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Introduction: General versus specific measures and the special case of core self-evaluations</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul E. Spector</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.762</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.762</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.762</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Point-Counterpoint</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">151</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">152</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This paper introduces a <em>Journal of Organizational Behavior</em> point/counterpoint exchange (this issue) that focuses on the appropriate level of aggregation primarily in the assessment of personality in general and core self-evaluations (CSE) in particular. Gilad Chen reviews arguments for and against the higher-order construct of CSE, offering a number of recommendations for strengthening it. Timothy Judge and John Kammeyer-Mueller offer a defense of CSE, and then extend the discussion to the measurement of other constructs beyond the personality domain. Together these two papers provide important insights about the appropriate level of aggregation of individual measures, and situations in which higher-order versus lower-order measures might be preferred. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This paper introduces a Journal of Organizational Behavior point/counterpoint exchange (this issue) that focuses on the appropriate level of aggregation primarily in the assessment of personality in general and core self-evaluations (CSE) in particular. Gilad Chen reviews arguments for and against the higher-order construct of CSE, offering a number of recommendations for strengthening it. Timothy Judge and John Kammeyer-Mueller offer a defense of CSE, and then extend the discussion to the measurement of other constructs beyond the personality domain. Together these two papers provide important insights about the appropriate level of aggregation of individual measures, and situations in which higher-order versus lower-order measures might be preferred. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.761" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Evaluating the core: Critical assessment of core self-evaluations theory</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.761</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evaluating the core: Critical assessment of core self-evaluations theory</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gilad Chen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.761</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.761</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.761</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Point-Counterpoint</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">153</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">160</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In 1997, Judge, Locke, and Durham published the core self-evaluations (CSE) theory proposing that a multidimensional CSE construct, composed of emotional stability, self-esteem, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy, accounts for individual differences in job satisfaction as well as in other organizational behavior outcomes. In this article, I argue that, despite ample evidence in support of the predictive validity of the CSE construct, the adequacy of including emotional stability, self-esteem, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy as indicators of the CSE construct may be questionable, and I review evidence that points to limited convergent and discriminant validity of the CSE construct. I conclude the article with a few recommendations for advancing CSE theory and research. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>In 1997, Judge, Locke, and Durham published the core self-evaluations (CSE) theory proposing that a multidimensional CSE construct, composed of emotional stability, self-esteem, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy, accounts for individual differences in job satisfaction as well as in other organizational behavior outcomes. In this article, I argue that, despite ample evidence in support of the predictive validity of the CSE construct, the adequacy of including emotional stability, self-esteem, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy as indicators of the CSE construct may be questionable, and I review evidence that points to limited convergent and discriminant validity of the CSE construct. I conclude the article with a few recommendations for advancing CSE theory and research. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.764" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>General and specific measures in organizational behavior research: Considerations, examples, and recommendations for researchers</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.764</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">General and specific measures in organizational behavior research: Considerations, examples, and recommendations for researchers</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Timothy A. Judge</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John D. Kammeyer-Mueller</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.764</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.764</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.764</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Point-Counterpoint</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">161</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">174</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Deliberation over and relative preference for general or specific (broad or narrow) constructs has long been an important issue in organizational behavior research. In this article, we provide a review of this general issue and some specific recommendations for researchers. We begin by discussing whether the general versus specific issue is an important debate and by discussing other underlying issues (the role of researcher preferences, distinction between reflective and formative indicators, and distinction between constructs and measures of constructs). Building on Chen's (this issue) analysis of core self-evaluations, we first discuss how the general–specific debate has progressed in core self-evaluations research. We then discuss three other important areas in which this debate has played out: intelligence, five-factor model of personality, and job attitudes. Finally, we offer a framework to help guide decisions about whether to utilize general measures, specific measures, or both and conclude by providing recommendations for the use of general and specific measures in organizational behavior research. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Deliberation over and relative preference for general or specific (broad or narrow) constructs has long been an important issue in organizational behavior research. In this article, we provide a review of this general issue and some specific recommendations for researchers. We begin by discussing whether the general versus specific issue is an important debate and by discussing other underlying issues (the role of researcher preferences, distinction between reflective and formative indicators, and distinction between constructs and measures of constructs). Building on Chen's (this issue) analysis of core self-evaluations, we first discuss how the general–specific debate has progressed in core self-evaluations research. We then discuss three other important areas in which this debate has played out: intelligence, five-factor model of personality, and job attitudes. Finally, we offer a framework to help guide decisions about whether to utilize general measures, specific measures, or both and conclude by providing recommendations for the use of general and specific measures in organizational behavior research. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.742" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.742</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Neal</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gillian Yeo</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Annette Koy</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tania Xiao</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.742</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.742</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.742</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">175</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">192</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This research examined the prediction of the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Nine dimensions of work role performance are created by cross-classifying the form of work role behavior (proficient, adaptive, and proactive) with the level at which that behavior contributes to effectiveness (individual, team, and organizational). The authors collected self-report measurements of personality from 1447 government employees and supervisor ratings of performance. Openness to experience and agreeableness had opposing effects on individual proactivity – openness was positively related, whereas agreeableness was negatively related to this dimension. Openness to experience also had opposing effects on the form of work role performance – it was positively related to individual and organizational proactivity but negatively related to team and organizational proficiency. Conscientiousness was a stronger predictor of individual task proficiency than the remaining eight dimensions, whereas the reverse was true for neuroticism. Extraversion was negatively related to individual proficiency. Using a broad taxonomy of performance that incorporates a theoretical framework for distinguishing between constructs shows promise for identifying which personality traits are important for which aspects of work role performance. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This research examined the prediction of the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Nine dimensions of work role performance are created by cross-classifying the form of work role behavior (proficient, adaptive, and proactive) with the level at which that behavior contributes to effectiveness (individual, team, and organizational). The authors collected self-report measurements of personality from 1447 government employees and supervisor ratings of performance. Openness to experience and agreeableness had opposing effects on individual proactivity – openness was positively related, whereas agreeableness was negatively related to this dimension. Openness to experience also had opposing effects on the form of work role performance – it was positively related to individual and organizational proactivity but negatively related to team and organizational proficiency. Conscientiousness was a stronger predictor of individual task proficiency than the remaining eight dimensions, whereas the reverse was true for neuroticism. Extraversion was negatively related to individual proficiency. Using a broad taxonomy of performance that incorporates a theoretical framework for distinguishing between constructs shows promise for identifying which personality traits are important for which aspects of work role performance. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.743" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.743</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alessandro Minichilli</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alessandro Zattoni</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sabina Nielsen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Morten Huse</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.743</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.743</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.743</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">193</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">215</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This paper addresses recent calls to narrow the micro–macro gap in management research (Bamberger, 2008), by incorporating a macro-level context variable (country) in exploring micro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Following the integrated model proposed by Forbes and Milliken (1999), we identify three board processes as micro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Specifically, we focus on effort norms, cognitive conflicts and the use of knowledge and skills as determinants of board control and advisory task performance. Further, we consider how two different institutional settings influence board tasks, and how the context moderates the relationship between processes and tasks. Our hypotheses are tested on a survey-based dataset of 535 medium-sized and large industrial firms in Italy and Norway, which are considered to substantially differ along legal and cultural dimensions. The findings show that: (i) Board processes have a larger potential than demographic variables to explain board task performance; (ii) board task performance differs significantly between boards operating in different contexts; and (iii) national context moderates the relationships between board processes and board task performance. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This paper addresses recent calls to narrow the micro–macro gap in management research (Bamberger, 2008), by incorporating a macro-level context variable (country) in exploring micro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Following the integrated model proposed by Forbes and Milliken (1999), we identify three board processes as micro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Specifically, we focus on effort norms, cognitive conflicts and the use of knowledge and skills as determinants of board control and advisory task performance. Further, we consider how two different institutional settings influence board tasks, and how the context moderates the relationship between processes and tasks. Our hypotheses are tested on a survey-based dataset of 535 medium-sized and large industrial firms in Italy and Norway, which are considered to substantially differ along legal and cultural dimensions. The findings show that: (i) Board processes have a larger potential than demographic variables to explain board task performance; (ii) board task performance differs significantly between boards operating in different contexts; and (iii) national context moderates the relationships between board processes and board task performance. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.754" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.754</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas W. H. Ng</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel C. Feldman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.754</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.754</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.754</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">216</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">234</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although voice (i.e. expressing change-oriented ideas and suggestions) has frequently been investigated as a way for workers to reciprocate to their employers for the positive treatment they receive, much less is known about how workers use voice to deal with stress. This study takes a conservation of resources perspective to examine the relationships among workplace stress, voice behavior, and job performance. We first examined the strength of relationships of three major groups of workplace stressors and strains (job based, social based, and organization based) with voice behavior. We then examined the relationships of voice behavior with performance variables (e.g. in-role performance and creativity) to investigate how voice may help workers preserve or accumulate resources to enhance their performance. The meta-analytic findings presented here provide support for a negative relationship between workplace stress and voice and a positive relationship between voice behavior and performance outcomes. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Although voice (i.e. expressing change-oriented ideas and suggestions) has frequently been investigated as a way for workers to reciprocate to their employers for the positive treatment they receive, much less is known about how workers use voice to deal with stress. This study takes a conservation of resources perspective to examine the relationships among workplace stress, voice behavior, and job performance. We first examined the strength of relationships of three major groups of workplace stressors and strains (job based, social based, and organization based) with voice behavior. We then examined the relationships of voice behavior with performance variables (e.g. in-role performance and creativity) to investigate how voice may help workers preserve or accumulate resources to enhance their performance. The meta-analytic findings presented here provide support for a negative relationship between workplace stress and voice and a positive relationship between voice behavior and performance outcomes. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.755" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.755</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James C. Hayton</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gianluca Carnabuci</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Eisenberger</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.755</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.755</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.755</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">235</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">249</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We examined the role of social embeddedness in creating positive perceptions of organizational support among managerial and staff employees (<em>n</em> = 72) of a large manufacturing firm. We operationalized social embeddedness as the size, density, and quality of employees' networks of multiplex, reciprocated exchange relationships with colleagues. After controlling for support from supervisors and upper management, we found all three aspects of social embeddedness to be associated with perceived organizational support (POS). This research suggests that in addition to the top-down influence of the organizational hierarchy, POS results from the organizational community within which employees are embedded through their social network in the workplace. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We examined the role of social embeddedness in creating positive perceptions of organizational support among managerial and staff employees (n = 72) of a large manufacturing firm. We operationalized social embeddedness as the size, density, and quality of employees' networks of multiplex, reciprocated exchange relationships with colleagues. After controlling for support from supervisors and upper management, we found all three aspects of social embeddedness to be associated with perceived organizational support (POS). This research suggests that in addition to the top-down influence of the organizational hierarchy, POS results from the organizational community within which employees are embedded through their social network in the workplace. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.756" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.756</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christine Porath</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gretchen Spreitzer</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cristina Gibson</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Flannery G. Garnett</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.756</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.756</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.756</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">250</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">275</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Thriving is defined as the psychological state in which individuals experience both a sense of vitality and learning. We developed and validated a measure of the construct of thriving at work. Additionally, we theoretically refined the construct by linking it to key outcomes, such as job performance, and by examining its contextual embeddedness. In Study 1, we conducted second-order confirmatory factor analyses in two samples, demonstrating initial support for the two-dimensional structure of thriving. We provided evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of thriving in relation to theoretically related constructs, such as positive and negative affects, learning and performance goal orientations, proactive personality, and core self-evaluations. In Study 2, across two different samples, we further assessed construct validity by establishing a relationship between thriving and career development initiative, burnout, health, and individual job performance, explaining significant variance beyond traditional attitudinal predictors, such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Finally, in Study 3, we focused on understanding the contextual embeddedness of thriving. We found differences in reports of thriving across two points in time, when substantial changes are occurring in peoples' work lives and across contexts (i.e., work and non-work). Implications for theory and practice, as well as directions for future research, are discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Thriving is defined as the psychological state in which individuals experience both a sense of vitality and learning. We developed and validated a measure of the construct of thriving at work. Additionally, we theoretically refined the construct by linking it to key outcomes, such as job performance, and by examining its contextual embeddedness. In Study 1, we conducted second-order confirmatory factor analyses in two samples, demonstrating initial support for the two-dimensional structure of thriving. We provided evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of thriving in relation to theoretically related constructs, such as positive and negative affects, learning and performance goal orientations, proactive personality, and core self-evaluations. In Study 2, across two different samples, we further assessed construct validity by establishing a relationship between thriving and career development initiative, burnout, health, and individual job performance, explaining significant variance beyond traditional attitudinal predictors, such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Finally, in Study 3, we focused on understanding the contextual embeddedness of thriving. We found differences in reports of thriving across two points in time, when substantial changes are occurring in peoples' work lives and across contexts (i.e., work and non-work). Implications for theory and practice, as well as directions for future research, are discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.760" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.760</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evangelia Demerouti</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnold B. Bakker</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sabine Sonnentag</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive J. Fullagar</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.760</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.760</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.760</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">276</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">295</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In this diary study, we aimed to examine the moderating effects of the following: (i) recovery efforts at work and (ii) detachment from work on the relationship between work-related flow and energy after work. Specifically, we hypothesized that flow would be beneficial for energy after work when employees failed (versus managed) to recover during work breaks. Additionally, we predicted that when employees experience flow at work, they would be more vigorous (and less exhausted) at the end of the day when they detached from work in the evening compared with days when they failed to detach. The study tracked 83 participants who completed daily surveys over four consecutive days. Results of multilevel analyses indicated that some characteristics of flow, such as absorption and enjoyment, were significantly associated with energy after work. Recovery at work and detachment from work moderated the relationship between flow (specifically the enjoyment component) and after-work energy. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>In this diary study, we aimed to examine the moderating effects of the following: (i) recovery efforts at work and (ii) detachment from work on the relationship between work-related flow and energy after work. Specifically, we hypothesized that flow would be beneficial for energy after work when employees failed (versus managed) to recover during work breaks. Additionally, we predicted that when employees experience flow at work, they would be more vigorous (and less exhausted) at the end of the day when they detached from work in the evening compared with days when they failed to detach. The study tracked 83 participants who completed daily surveys over four consecutive days. Results of multilevel analyses indicated that some characteristics of flow, such as absorption and enjoyment, were significantly associated with energy after work. Recovery at work and detachment from work moderated the relationship between flow (specifically the enjoyment component) and after-work energy. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.784" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: Researcher and practitioner collaboration</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.784</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: Researcher and practitioner collaboration</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christina Maslach</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael P. Leiter</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan E. Jackson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/job.784</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/job.784</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjob.784</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">The Incubator</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">296</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">300</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Summary</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Burnout research over the past 30 years has yielded both knowledge and tools to apply to interventions at unit and organizational levels. Examples of innovative partnerships between researchers and practitioners point to the importance of multi-level approaches in generating relevant and effective solutions to the burnout problem. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Burnout research over the past 30 years has yielded both knowledge and tools to apply to interventions at unit and organizational levels. Examples of innovative partnerships between researchers and practitioners point to the importance of multi-level approaches in generating relevant and effective solutions to the burnout problem. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item></rdf:RDF>
