<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/rss/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1441" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Knowledge and Process Management</title><description> Wiley Online Library : Knowledge and Process Management</description><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2F%28ISSN%291099-1441</link><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en</dc:language><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">© John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</dc:rights><prism:issn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1092-4604</prism:issn><prism:eIssn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1099-1441</prism:eIssn><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><prism:coverDisplayDate xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">January/March 2013</prism:coverDisplayDate><prism:volume xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">20</prism:volume><prism:number xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1</prism:number><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">58</prism:endingPage><image rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/kpm.v20.1/asset/cover.gif?v=1&amp;s=1f9cedeb2c36fbea234a72233490ef38d575498c"/><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1405"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1404"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1402"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1400"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1399"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1403"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1401"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1405" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities through Continuous Improvement on Innovation: the Role of Business Process Orientation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1405</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities through Continuous Improvement on Innovation: the Role of Business Process Orientation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Kohlbacher</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-11T05:37:02.931098-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1405</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1405</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1405</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although there is much emphasis on the importance of continuous improvement as a dynamic capability and business process orientation, little attention has been paid to their interactions and joint effects on a firm's innovation performance. In this paper, we empirically explore the interaction effect of continuous improvement as a dynamic capability and business process orientation on time-to-market speed. By employing a unique and hand-collected dataset of Austrian manufacturing companies, it is shown that firms increase their innovation performance when they implement both—a process-oriented organizational design and continuous improvement methodologies. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>
Although there is much emphasis on the importance of continuous improvement as a dynamic capability and business process orientation, little attention has been paid to their interactions and joint effects on a firm's innovation performance. In this paper, we empirically explore the interaction effect of continuous improvement as a dynamic capability and business process orientation on time-to-market speed. By employing a unique and hand-collected dataset of Austrian manufacturing companies, it is shown that firms increase their innovation performance when they implement both—a process-oriented organizational design and continuous improvement methodologies. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1404" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance in Serbia</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1404</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance in Serbia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stevo Janošević, Vladimir Dženopoljac, Nick Bontis</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-20T11:13:35.337133-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1404</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1404</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1404</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">11</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="kpm1404-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Purpose</h4><div class="para"><p>This research paper explores the impact of intellectual capital (IC) and its various components on financial performance of 100 Serbian companies within the real sector (which includes all companies in the Serbian economy not including banking and insurance).</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="kpm1404-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Design/methodology/approach</h4><div class="para"><p>The performance measures used were net profit, operating revenues, operating profit, return on equity (ROE), and return on assets (ROA), whereas IC efficiency was measured using value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC). A multiple-regression model was used to assess the relationship among individual components of VAIC and financial performance.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="kpm1404-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Findings</h4><div class="para"><p>Net profit, operating revenue, and operating profit are not the consequence of the efficient use of IC in Serbian companies. On the other hand, human and structural capital affect ROE and ROA, whereas physical capital influences ROE.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="kpm1404-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Research limitations/implications</h4><div class="para"><p>VAIC is an accounting measure of performance and therefore does not provide an adequate framework for analyzing synergy between human, structural, and physical capital. In addition, the model fails to offer adequate analysis for those companies that have negative values for equity and operating profit.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="kpm1404-sec-0005" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Practical implications</h4><div class="para"><p>The presented results are especially useful for further research regarding the role and significance of IC for Serbian companies. By focusing on adequate IC management and use, the Serbian economy's competitiveness level would increase.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="kpm1404-sec-0006" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Originality/value</h4><div class="para"><p>This paper is original as no previous empirical work on IC and its effects on financial performance have been carried out among Serbian companies in the real sector. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>

Purpose
This research paper explores the impact of intellectual capital (IC) and its various components on financial performance of 100 Serbian companies within the real sector (which includes all companies in the Serbian economy not including banking and insurance).

Design/methodology/approach
The performance measures used were net profit, operating revenues, operating profit, return on equity (ROE), and return on assets (ROA), whereas IC efficiency was measured using value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC). A multiple-regression model was used to assess the relationship among individual components of VAIC and financial performance.

Findings
Net profit, operating revenue, and operating profit are not the consequence of the efficient use of IC in Serbian companies. On the other hand, human and structural capital affect ROE and ROA, whereas physical capital influences ROE.

Research limitations/implications
VAIC is an accounting measure of performance and therefore does not provide an adequate framework for analyzing synergy between human, structural, and physical capital. In addition, the model fails to offer adequate analysis for those companies that have negative values for equity and operating profit.

Practical implications
The presented results are especially useful for further research regarding the role and significance of IC for Serbian companies. By focusing on adequate IC management and use, the Serbian economy's competitiveness level would increase.

Originality/value
This paper is original as no previous empirical work on IC and its effects on financial performance have been carried out among Serbian companies in the real sector. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1402" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The Passion for Knowledge: implications for its Transfer</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1402</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Passion for Knowledge: implications for its Transfer</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurent Sié, Ali Yakhlef</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-01-31T21:58:27.994579-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1402</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1402</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1402</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">12</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">20</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Research into knowledge sharing has mainly treated knowledge from an instrumental, market-driven perspective. On this view, research has focused on the psychological (e.g. motivation), cognitive (e.g. absorptive capacity) and social features (e.g. weak/strong ties) of the knowledge entities, the structural (formal or informal) characteristics of the organizational context and the nature of knowledge to be transferred (such as its stickiness and causal complexity). The present study seeks to suggest passion as a contingency that impacts the knowledge transfer process positively. Passion for knowledge may constitute a social bond that holds a community together. Passionate members are inclined to share their object of passion—knowledge—more readily. Our argument is based on information elicited from a number of scientific experts within the petrol industry. In their daily work, experts regard the transfer of knowledge as sine qua non of becoming expert, as interactions with others are (i) learning opportunities for themselves and (ii) as social occasions to relate to their peers and on to talk about and share stories about the object to their passion (knowledge). The contribution of the paper is thus to suggest emotional aspects (passion, attachment and interest) related to knowledge as a factor that impacts the transfer of knowledge. Finally, conclusions and implications are discussed. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>
Research into knowledge sharing has mainly treated knowledge from an instrumental, market-driven perspective. On this view, research has focused on the psychological (e.g. motivation), cognitive (e.g. absorptive capacity) and social features (e.g. weak/strong ties) of the knowledge entities, the structural (formal or informal) characteristics of the organizational context and the nature of knowledge to be transferred (such as its stickiness and causal complexity). The present study seeks to suggest passion as a contingency that impacts the knowledge transfer process positively. Passion for knowledge may constitute a social bond that holds a community together. Passionate members are inclined to share their object of passion—knowledge—more readily. Our argument is based on information elicited from a number of scientific experts within the petrol industry. In their daily work, experts regard the transfer of knowledge as sine qua non of becoming expert, as interactions with others are (i) learning opportunities for themselves and (ii) as social occasions to relate to their peers and on to talk about and share stories about the object to their passion (knowledge). The contribution of the paper is thus to suggest emotional aspects (passion, attachment and interest) related to knowledge as a factor that impacts the transfer of knowledge. Finally, conclusions and implications are discussed. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1400" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Creating a Process and Organization Fit Index: an Approach toward Optimal Process and Organization Design</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1400</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Creating a Process and Organization Fit Index: an Approach toward Optimal Process and Organization Design</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sung-Nyun Hearn, Injun Choi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-20T11:13:35.337133-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1400</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1400</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1400</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">21</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">29</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Fitting organizational units to business processes and vice versa is critical to design optimal organizational structures and processes, which is very important for business process reengineering. Business processes and organizational structures are designed separately and independently, however, because there are very few studies to analyze the relationship between them for their effective design. This paper introduces an approach to evaluating the fit between business processes and organizational structures. An index is proposed to evaluate the process and organization fit in terms of the overhead incurred by organizational structures for transfers of work in business processes. Furthermore, indices for relatively evaluating the overall fit are proposed to compare alternative processes and structures. Finally, a case study is presented to illustrate the validity and applicability of the approach. The proposed indices will allow not only the rapid evaluation of alternative organizational structures and business processes but also the identification of problems that cause the lack of fit between them. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>
Fitting organizational units to business processes and vice versa is critical to design optimal organizational structures and processes, which is very important for business process reengineering. Business processes and organizational structures are designed separately and independently, however, because there are very few studies to analyze the relationship between them for their effective design. This paper introduces an approach to evaluating the fit between business processes and organizational structures. An index is proposed to evaluate the process and organization fit in terms of the overhead incurred by organizational structures for transfers of work in business processes. Furthermore, indices for relatively evaluating the overall fit are proposed to compare alternative processes and structures. Finally, a case study is presented to illustrate the validity and applicability of the approach. The proposed indices will allow not only the rapid evaluation of alternative organizational structures and business processes but also the identification of problems that cause the lack of fit between them. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1399" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Knowledge Management Practices in the Nigerian Telecommunications Industry</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1399</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Knowledge Management Practices in the Nigerian Telecommunications Industry</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, Isola Ajiferuke</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-20T11:13:35.337133-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1399</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1399</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1399</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">30</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">39</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The main objective of the study was to examine how Nigerian telecommunications organizations leverage knowledge in achieving organizational performance and competitive advantage. Forty organizations were selected by using stratified random sampling from the 150 organizations in the Nigerian telecommunications industry. Twenty-nine of the selected organizations agreed to participate in the study, and questionnaires were then distributed to 14 senior executives in each of these organizations. Four hundred and six questionnaires were returned, but only 329 complete ones were used for analysis. The results from the study showed the following: that there is poor management of human capital in the Nigerian telecommunications industry; that lack of effective communication appears to be the bane of structural capital management in the industry; that most of the telecommunications companies in Nigeria have had a long-term relationship with their customers; and that Nigerian telecommunications organizations are familiar with knowledge management as a concept. The results also showed slight differences among the six groups of organizations in their management of intellectual capital with the Local Exchange operators and National Carrier as the best and worst performers, respectively. In conclusion, it is suggested that Nigerian telecommunications organizations should strive to provide a conducive and an enabling working environment, where people can share ideas about work without being shut down by bosses and bureaucrats, and that they should try harder to implement their customers' suggestions, especially when such suggestions have to do with meeting the customers' needs. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>
The main objective of the study was to examine how Nigerian telecommunications organizations leverage knowledge in achieving organizational performance and competitive advantage. Forty organizations were selected by using stratified random sampling from the 150 organizations in the Nigerian telecommunications industry. Twenty-nine of the selected organizations agreed to participate in the study, and questionnaires were then distributed to 14 senior executives in each of these organizations. Four hundred and six questionnaires were returned, but only 329 complete ones were used for analysis. The results from the study showed the following: that there is poor management of human capital in the Nigerian telecommunications industry; that lack of effective communication appears to be the bane of structural capital management in the industry; that most of the telecommunications companies in Nigeria have had a long-term relationship with their customers; and that Nigerian telecommunications organizations are familiar with knowledge management as a concept. The results also showed slight differences among the six groups of organizations in their management of intellectual capital with the Local Exchange operators and National Carrier as the best and worst performers, respectively. In conclusion, it is suggested that Nigerian telecommunications organizations should strive to provide a conducive and an enabling working environment, where people can share ideas about work without being shut down by bosses and bureaucrats, and that they should try harder to implement their customers' suggestions, especially when such suggestions have to do with meeting the customers' needs. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1403" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A Practical Proposal for a “Competence Plan Fulfillment” Key Performance Indicator</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1403</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Practical Proposal for a “Competence Plan Fulfillment” Key Performance Indicator</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guendalina Capece, Paolo Bazzica</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-20T11:13:35.337133-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1403</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1403</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1403</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">40</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">49</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This paper deals with the creation of a framework for competence management research with specific emphasis on firm context. We consider that the traditional approaches to competence assignment planning lack in the development of appropriate tools for the management of the competence. Nowadays there is, indeed, a need for research into competence and the management of competence. In this paper, we develop a framework for competence management. Because no universally accepted framework exists yet, the following article proposes various aspects of competence management and illustrates a new approach to characterize and manage competency.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Building a tool oriented towards competency allocation allows the development of a dynamic competency database and is a first step to improving the achievement of relevant goals such as competence allocation or project team building (matching of tasks and competencies), and the development and transfer of competencies (e.g., by supporting reflective practice). Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>
This paper deals with the creation of a framework for competence management research with specific emphasis on firm context. We consider that the traditional approaches to competence assignment planning lack in the development of appropriate tools for the management of the competence. Nowadays there is, indeed, a need for research into competence and the management of competence. In this paper, we develop a framework for competence management. Because no universally accepted framework exists yet, the following article proposes various aspects of competence management and illustrates a new approach to characterize and manage competency.
Building a tool oriented towards competency allocation allows the development of a dynamic competency database and is a first step to improving the achievement of relevant goals such as competence allocation or project team building (matching of tasks and competencies), and the development and transfer of competencies (e.g., by supporting reflective practice). Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1401" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Turning Corporate Social Responsibility-driven Opportunities in Competitive Advantages: a Two-dimensional Model</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1401</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Turning Corporate Social Responsibility-driven Opportunities in Competitive Advantages: a Two-dimensional Model</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Armando Calabrese, Roberta Costa, Tamara Menichini, Francesco Rosati, Gaetano Sanfelice</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-01-30T00:19:35.549701-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/kpm.1401</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/kpm.1401</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fkpm.1401</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">50</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">58</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Employing corporate social responsibility (CSR) for competitiveness enhancement requires a radical change in managerial thinking and new tools for supporting business activities. Indeed, the lack of suitable measures for detecting the stage of a company CSR cultural development hinders the identification and exploitation of business opportunities related to CSR. Following this lead, in this paper, we propose a two-dimensional CSR model for supporting managers in their pursuing for long-term competitiveness, turning CSR-driven opportunities in business advantages.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The model is based on two dimensions: the “CSR development” dimension and the “CSR commitment” dimension. The CSR development dimension allows decision makers to position companies with respect to the stage of their CSR cultural evolution, whereas the CSR commitment dimension assesses companies' degree of commitment based on their economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic CSR performance. The position that a company occupies in the two-dimensional CSR model describes both its actual stage of CSR cultural development and its CSR commitment. Finally, the model is employed to a case study in the banking sector. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>
Employing corporate social responsibility (CSR) for competitiveness enhancement requires a radical change in managerial thinking and new tools for supporting business activities. Indeed, the lack of suitable measures for detecting the stage of a company CSR cultural development hinders the identification and exploitation of business opportunities related to CSR. Following this lead, in this paper, we propose a two-dimensional CSR model for supporting managers in their pursuing for long-term competitiveness, turning CSR-driven opportunities in business advantages.
The model is based on two dimensions: the “CSR development” dimension and the “CSR commitment” dimension. The CSR development dimension allows decision makers to position companies with respect to the stage of their CSR cultural evolution, whereas the CSR commitment dimension assesses companies' degree of commitment based on their economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic CSR performance. The position that a company occupies in the two-dimensional CSR model describes both its actual stage of CSR cultural development and its CSR commitment. Finally, the model is employed to a case study in the banking sector. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description></item></rdf:RDF>