Until 2006, BKPyV and JCPyV were the only known human polyomaviruses. A third polyomavirus, simian virus 40 whose natural host is the macaque was accidently introduced into man because of contaminated poliovirus vaccines, although there is epidemiological evidence that SV40 may be transmitted between man independently from contaminated vaccines. Since 2007, 10 new human polyomaviruses have been identified: KIPyV, WUPyV, Merkel cell polyomavirus, trichodysplasia spinulosa-associated polyomavirus, and human polyomaviruses 6, 7, 9, 10, STL, and 12. Moreover, the DNA of the monkey lymphotropic polyomavirus has been amplified from human peripheral blood. Seroepidemiological studies frequently based on the presence of antibodies against the major capsid protein VP1 or virus-like particles indicate that most human adults have been exposed to many, if not all, human polyomaviruses. However, because of the high amino acid sequence identity between VP1 of some human polyomaviruses, cross-reactivity of antibodies is occasionally observed. In addition, human sera possess reactivity against VP1 of polyomaviruses from other species, suggesting serological cross-reaction with known or closely related, yet unidentified human polyomaviruses and/or the possibility of zoonotic transmission. Thus, current serological results should be interpreted with caution, and controls excluding cross-reactivity with other polyomaviruses are required. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) was the first retrovirus shown to cause human disease, such as adult T-cell leukemia and HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropic spastic paraparesis. HTLV-1 mainly infects CD4 T cells and deregulates their differentiation, function and homeostasis, which should contribute to the pathogenesis of HTLV-1, for example, inducing transformation of infected CD4 T cells and chronic inflammatory diseases. Therefore, not only virological approach but also immunological approach regarding CD4 T cells are required to understand how HTLV-1 causes related human diseases. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the interaction between HTLV-1 and the main host cell, CD4 T cells, which should provide us some clue to the mechanisms of HTLV-1 mediated pathogenesis. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Because maternal seropositivity for CMV is associated with substantial protection against congenital CMV infection, prevention measures have focused mainly on seronegative pregnant women for decades. However, population-wide insight in the contribution of nonprimary infection (reactivation and/or re-infection with a different strain) on the most common sequela, hearing loss, is missing.

A population-based prediction model was developed to estimate the proportion of congenital CMV-related hearing loss resulting from nonprimary maternal infection. Incorporated was a meta-analysis of the risk of hearing loss, calculating pooled proportions of children with hearing loss after nonprimary and primary infection. Subsequently, the model was applied for worldwide present population seroprevalences (range 30–95%).

It was estimated that, for all population seroprevalences, nonprimary maternal infections are responsible for the majority of congenital CMV infections. This proportion increased with seroprevalence, ranging from 57% (95%CI 24–85%) to 96% (95% CI 88–99%) for seroprevalences of 30% to 95%. Our meta-analysis (six reports) showed that the risk of hearing loss after nonprimary infection was 11% (28/253 children, 95% CI 7–15%) versus 13% (50/385 children, 95% CI 10–16%) after primary infection. Incorporating this risk into our model, we estimated that nonprimary infections also accounted for the majority of CMV-related hearing loss. This proportion ranged from 53% (95% CI 13–86%) to 95% (95% CI 62–99%) for seroprevalences of 30% to 95%.

Our data underline the worldwide contribution of nonprimary infections in causing CMV-related hearing loss. These results imply that prevention research such as vaccine and hygiene studies should not only be directed at seronegative but also seropositive pregnant women. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

HIV-1 and HIV-2 share many similarities including their basic gene arrangement, modes of transmission, intracellular replication pathways and clinical consequences: both result in AIDS. However, HIV-2 is characterised by lower transmissibility and reduced likelihood of progression to AIDS. The underlying mechanistic differences between these two infections illuminate broader issues of retroviral pathogenesis, which remain incompletely understood. Comparisons between these two infections from epidemiological, clinical, virologic and immunologic viewpoints provide a basis for hypothesis generation and testing in this ‘natural experiment’ in viral pathogenesis.

In terms of epidemiology, HIV-2 remains largely confined to West Africa, whereas HIV-1 extends worldwide. Clinically, HIV-2 infected individuals seem to dichotomise, most remaining long-term non-progressors, whereas most HIV-1 infected individuals progress. When clinical progression occurs, both diseases demonstrate very similar pathological processes, although progression in HIV-2 occurs at higher CD4 counts. Plasma viral loads are consistently lower in HIV-2, as are average levels of immune activation. Significant differences exist between the two infections in all components of the immune system. For example, cellular responses to HIV-2 tend to be more polyfunctional and produce more IL-2; humoral responses appear broader with lower magnitude intratype neutralisation responses; innate responses appear more robust, possibly through differential effects of tripartite motif protein isoform 5 alpha. Overall, the immune response to HIV-2 appears more protective against disease progression suggesting that pivotal immune factors limit viral pathology. If such immune responses could be replicated or induced in HIV-1 infected patients, they might extend survival and reduce requirements for antiretroviral therapy. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Because virus infections elicit various cellular responses that inhibit viral replication and growth, viruses must intervene to attenuate antiviral measures in order to thrive. The genome guardian p53 plays a central part not only in DNA damage responses, inducing cell cycle arrest or apoptosis, but also in the innate host immune control of viral infections by orchestrating diverse signaling pathways originating from many different cellular receptors and sensors. Many viruses have acquired sophisticated mechanisms to regulate p53 functions by deploying subversive proteins and modulating its post-transcriptional status. In this review, we overview the mechanisms by which DNA and RNA viruses manage p53 signaling in favor of their continued survival. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The aetiology of Crohn's disease (CD) is currently unknown. A viral trigger was proposed more than 40 years ago and has been the focus of many investigations. We summarised the current literature surrounding the association between viruses and CD and conducted a systematic review of all studies investigating this association quantitatively. Studies were identified by searching for 13 specific virus names or the general term ‘virus’ and ‘Crohn's disease’ in search engines PubMed and OVID. A total of 1315 studies were identified, of which 78 studies had a laboratory result. Of the 78, 46 case–control studies met all the inclusion criteria for forest plot analysis.

The most common viruses studied were EBV, CMV and measles virus (MV). Forest plot analysis for each virus was carried out (fitted using random effects) and identified evidence of an association between CD and CMV (risk ratio [RR] 1.602, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.069 to 2.400) with some suggestion that EBV may also be associated with CD (RR 1.366, 95% CI 0.996 to 1.873). However, there was evidence of large heterogeneity in the results from the identified studies for EBV. There was little evidence of an association with CD for MV, human herpes virus 6, human herpes virus 8, human simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, mumps virus, Rubella virus, rotavirus, norovirus and adenovirus. There is still some question around whether CD is associated with the presence of a currently known virus. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Hepatitis B immune globulin-free therapeutic regimens with a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) or NUC combinations after liver transplantation (LT) are currently being investigated for their efficacy and safety as HBV re-infection prophylaxis in clinical studies. Recurrence rates differ among these studies as most of them are limited by a non-randomised study design, small sample size, lack of long-term data and varying time intervals for the switch from combined to purely virostatic prophylaxis.

Post-transplant pre-emptive antiviral therapy with pegylated IFN and ribavirin is associated with low sustained virological response rates and was found to have no advantage over treatment of manifest HCV re-infection. Safety and efficacy of triple antiviral therapy including boceprevir or telaprevir in patients with manifest HCV re-infection are currently under investigation in clinical trials. Relevant drug interactions have been shown to occur during calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and concomitant triple antiviral therapy, which vary with type of CNI and choice of HCV protease inhibitor. Newer direct-acting antivirals with lower or minimal toxicity, when used in combination with immunosuppressives, are worthy of further study in LT patients.

This review focuses on hot topics in the management of hepatitis B and C patients before and after LT and offers a critical summarised selection of the corresponding relevant studies published in the current literature or presented at recent liver congresses. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) is among the most common human pathogens worldwide. Its entry into host cells is an intricate process that relies heavily on the ability of the viral glycoproteins to bind host cellular proteins and to efficiently mediate fusion of the virus envelope with the cell membrane. Acquisition of HSV-1 results in a lifelong latent infection. Because of the cycles of reactivation from a latent state, much emphasis has been placed on the management of infection through the use of DNA synthesis inhibitors. However, new methods are needed to provide more effective treatment at earlier phases of the viral infection and to prevent the development of drug resistance by the virus. This review outlines the infection process and the common therapeutics currently used against the fundamental stages of HSV-1 replication and fusion. The remainder of this article will focus on a new approach for HSV-1 infection control and management, the concept of glycoprotein-receptor targeting. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.