<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/rss/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1365-2168" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>British Journal of Surgery</title><description> Wiley Online Library : British Journal of Surgery</description><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2F%28ISSN%291365-2168</link><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en</dc:language><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Copyright © 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</dc:rights><prism:issn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">0007-1323</prism:issn><prism:eIssn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1365-2168</prism:eIssn><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-06-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><prism:coverDisplayDate xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">June 2013</prism:coverDisplayDate><prism:volume xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">100</prism:volume><prism:number xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">7</prism:number><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">847</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">983</prism:endingPage><image rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/bjs.2013.100.issue-7/asset/cover.gif?v=1&amp;s=f20e7c076ec57c8304b557fc695d052f0302a3e0"/><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9156"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9147"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9152"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9127"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9146"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9145"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9121"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9098"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9137"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9118"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9101"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9136"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9133"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9128"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9131"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9115"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9116"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9135"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9132"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9112"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9130"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9144"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9113"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9114"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9117"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9120"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9119"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9148"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9149"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9150"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9151"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9160"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9143"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9156" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Biological implants in abdominal wall repair</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9156</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Biological implants in abdominal wall repair</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A. H. Petter-Puchner, U. A. Dietz</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-15T05:05:45.844739-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9156</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9156</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9156</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Leading Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Research needed to find out how they work and why they fail</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
Research needed to find out how they work and why they fail
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9147" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Surgical behaviour</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9147</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Surgical behaviour</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">S. Galandiuk</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-10T10:02:19.290484-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9147</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9147</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9147</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Centenary collection</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Do the best for the patient</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
Do the best for the patient
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9152" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The effect of immune therapy on surgical site infection following Crohn's Disease resection</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9152</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The effect of immune therapy on surgical site infection following Crohn's Disease resection</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T. Serradori, A. Germain, M. L. Scherrer, C. Ayav, M. Perez, B. Romain, J. P. Palot, S. Rohr, L. Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Bresler</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T10:30:39.914808-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9152</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9152</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9152</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9152-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Patients with Crohn's disease are increasingly receiving antitumour necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) therapy. Whether anti-TNF-α therapy increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications in Crohn's disease is a matter of debate</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9152-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>This was a retrospective study of three referral centres. The charts of patients who underwent ileocaecal or ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed. The impact of baseline characteristics and Crohn's disease-related medications on the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications was investigated by univariable and multivariable analysis</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9152-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A total of 217 patients were included in the study. Median age at the time of surgery was 36·8 (range 15–78) years. A postoperative intra-abdominal infection occurred in 24 (11·1 per cent) of 217 patients. No deaths were reported. On univariable analysis, age less than 25 years (<i>P =</i> 0·023), steroid use (<i>P =</i> 0·017), anti-TNF-α therapy (<i>P =</i> 0·043) and anti-TNF-α treatment in combination with steroids (<i>P =</i> 0·004) were associated with an increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications. On multivariable analysis, only anti-TNF-α therapy in combination with steroids significantly increased this risk (odds ratio 8·03, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·93 to 33·43; <i>P =</i> 0·035)</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9152-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Combined use of steroids and anti-TNF-α therapy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Patients with Crohn's disease are increasingly receiving antitumour necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) therapy. Whether anti-TNF-α therapy increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications in Crohn's disease is a matter of debate.


Methods
This was a retrospective study of three referral centres. The charts of patients who underwent ileocaecal or ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed. The impact of baseline characteristics and Crohn's disease-related medications on the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications was investigated by univariable and multivariable analysis.


Results
A total of 217 patients were included in the study. Median age at the time of surgery was 36·8 (range 15–78) years. A postoperative intra-abdominal infection occurred in 24 (11·1 per cent) of 217 patients. No deaths were reported. On univariable analysis, age less than 25 years (P = 0·023), steroid use (P = 0·017), anti-TNF-α therapy (P = 0·043) and anti-TNF-α treatment in combination with steroids (P = 0·004) were associated with an increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications. On multivariable analysis, only anti-TNF-α therapy in combination with steroids significantly increased this risk (odds ratio 8·03, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·93 to 33·43; P = 0·035).


Conclusion
Combined use of steroids and anti-TNF-α therapy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9127" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Meta-analysis of contemporary short- and long-term mortality rates in patients diagnosed with critical leg ischaemia</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9127</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Meta-analysis of contemporary short- and long-term mortality rates in patients diagnosed with critical leg ischaemia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">K. E. Rollins, D. Jackson, P. A. Coughlin</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T10:30:24.964167-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9127</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9127</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9127</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Systematic review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9127-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Critical leg ischaemia (CLI) has been associated with high mortality rates. There is a lack of contemporary data on both short- and long-term mortality rates in patients diagnosed with CLI</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9127-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>This was a systematic literature search for studies prospectively reporting mortality in patients diagnosed with CLI. Meta-analysis and meta-regression models were developed to determine overall mortality rates and specific patient-related factors that were associated with death</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9127-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A total of 50 studies were included in the analysis The estimated probability of all-cause mortality in patients with CLI was 3·7 per cent at 30 days, 17·5 per cent at 1 year, 35·1 per cent at 3 years and 46·2 per cent at 5 years. Men had a statistically significant survival benefit at 30 days and 3 years. The presence of ischaemic heart disease, tissue loss and older age resulted in a higher probability of death at 3 years</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9127-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Early mortality rates in patients diagnosed with CLI have improved slightly compared with previous historical data, but long-term mortality rates are still high</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Critical leg ischaemia (CLI) has been associated with high mortality rates. There is a lack of contemporary data on both short- and long-term mortality rates in patients diagnosed with CLI.


Methods
This was a systematic literature search for studies prospectively reporting mortality in patients diagnosed with CLI. Meta-analysis and meta-regression models were developed to determine overall mortality rates and specific patient-related factors that were associated with death.


Results
A total of 50 studies were included in the analysis The estimated probability of all-cause mortality in patients with CLI was 3·7 per cent at 30 days, 17·5 per cent at 1 year, 35·1 per cent at 3 years and 46·2 per cent at 5 years. Men had a statistically significant survival benefit at 30 days and 3 years. The presence of ischaemic heart disease, tissue loss and older age resulted in a higher probability of death at 3 years.


Conclusion
Early mortality rates in patients diagnosed with CLI have improved slightly compared with previous historical data, but long-term mortality rates are still high.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9146" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of pancreatectomy on nutritional state, pancreatic function and quality of life</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9146</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of pancreatectomy on nutritional state, pancreatic function and quality of life</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J. W. Park, J.-Y. Jang, E.-J. Kim, M. J. Kang, W. Kwon, Y. R. Chang, I. W. Han, S.-W. Kim</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-24T09:44:59.204475-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9146</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9146</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9146</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9146-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>There are concerns about the extent of impaired endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function and poor quality of life (QoL) after pancreatectomy, but there is little information from large prospective follow-up studies.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9146-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2011 were included. Relative bodyweight (RBW), triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT), serum protein, albumin, transferrin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial 2-h glucose (PP2), glycosylated haemoglobin A1c and stool elastase measurements, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaires were collected serially for 1 year.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9146-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Some 136 patients undergoing pancreatic resection completed the study. RBW and TSFT recovered to over 90 per cent of the preoperative value by 12 months, whereas transferrin, albumin and protein had returned to preoperative levels by 3 months. Diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose or raised PP2 was present in 42 of 76 patients at 6 months and 36 of 76 at 12 months. Although steatorrhoea and diarrhoea had mainly resolved by 3 months, stool elastase level decreased after operation and showed no recovery. Nutritional status, pancreatic endocrine function and QoL returned to preoperative levels in 63 (46·3 per cent), 72 (52·9 per cent) and 77 (56·6 per cent) of 136 patients within 6 months of pancreatectomy. Multivariable analysis revealed that age 60 years or more, operation type, chronic pancreatitis and malignant disease had a significant impact on nutritional index, pancreatic function and QoL.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9146-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>About half of all patients can expect recovery from pancreatectomy after 6 months, but those with risk factors need more careful follow-up and supportive management.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
There are concerns about the extent of impaired endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function and poor quality of life (QoL) after pancreatectomy, but there is little information from large prospective follow-up studies.


Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2011 were included. Relative bodyweight (RBW), triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT), serum protein, albumin, transferrin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial 2-h glucose (PP2), glycosylated haemoglobin A1c and stool elastase measurements, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaires were collected serially for 1 year.


Results
Some 136 patients undergoing pancreatic resection completed the study. RBW and TSFT recovered to over 90 per cent of the preoperative value by 12 months, whereas transferrin, albumin and protein had returned to preoperative levels by 3 months. Diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose or raised PP2 was present in 42 of 76 patients at 6 months and 36 of 76 at 12 months. Although steatorrhoea and diarrhoea had mainly resolved by 3 months, stool elastase level decreased after operation and showed no recovery. Nutritional status, pancreatic endocrine function and QoL returned to preoperative levels in 63 (46·3 per cent), 72 (52·9 per cent) and 77 (56·6 per cent) of 136 patients within 6 months of pancreatectomy. Multivariable analysis revealed that age 60 years or more, operation type, chronic pancreatitis and malignant disease had a significant impact on nutritional index, pancreatic function and QoL.


Conclusion
About half of all patients can expect recovery from pancreatectomy after 6 months, but those with risk factors need more careful follow-up and supportive management.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9145" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Defining a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer and its implications for adjuvant treatment</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9145</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Defining a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer and its implications for adjuvant treatment</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J. R. O'Neill, N. A. Stephens, V. Save, H. M. Kamel, H. A. Phillips, P. J. Driscoll, S. Paterson-Brown</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-24T09:43:50.437853-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9145</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9145</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9145</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9145-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been associated with a poorer prognosis in oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional (OGJ) cancer. The College of American Pathologists defines the CRM as positive if tumour cells are present at the margin, whereas the Royal College of Pathologists also include tumour cells within 1 mm of this margin. The relevance of these differences is not clear and no study has investigated the impact of adjuvant therapy. The aim was to identify the optimal definition of an involved CRM in patients undergoing resection for oesophageal or OGJ cancer, and to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy improved survival in patients with an involved CRM.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9145-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>This was a single-centre retrospective study of patients who had undergone attempted curative resection for a pathological T3 oesophageal or OGJ cancer. Clinicopathological variables and distance from the tumour to the CRM, measured to ± 0.1 mm, were correlated with survival.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9145-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A total of 226 patients were included. Sex (<i>P</i> = 0·018), tumour differentiation (<i>P</i> = 0·019), lymph node status (<i>P</i> &lt; 0·001), number of positive nodes (P &lt; 0·001), and CRM distance (<i>P</i> = 0·042) were independently predictive of prognosis. No significant survival difference was observed between positive CRM 0-mm and 0·1–0·9-mm groups after controlling for other prognostic variables. Both groups had poorer survival than matched patients with a CRM at least 1 mm clear of tumour cells. Among patients with a positive CRM of less than 1 mm, those undergoing observation alone had a median survival of 18·6 months, whereas survival was a median of 10 months longer in patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy, but otherwise matched for prognostic variables (<i>P</i> = 0·009).</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9145-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A positive CRM of 1 mm or less should be regarded as involved. Adjuvant radiotherapy confers a significant survival benefit in selected patients with an involved CRM.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been associated with a poorer prognosis in oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional (OGJ) cancer. The College of American Pathologists defines the CRM as positive if tumour cells are present at the margin, whereas the Royal College of Pathologists also include tumour cells within 1 mm of this margin. The relevance of these differences is not clear and no study has investigated the impact of adjuvant therapy. The aim was to identify the optimal definition of an involved CRM in patients undergoing resection for oesophageal or OGJ cancer, and to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy improved survival in patients with an involved CRM.


Methods
This was a single-centre retrospective study of patients who had undergone attempted curative resection for a pathological T3 oesophageal or OGJ cancer. Clinicopathological variables and distance from the tumour to the CRM, measured to ± 0.1 mm, were correlated with survival.


Results
A total of 226 patients were included. Sex (P = 0·018), tumour differentiation (P = 0·019), lymph node status (P &lt; 0·001), number of positive nodes (P &lt; 0·001), and CRM distance (P = 0·042) were independently predictive of prognosis. No significant survival difference was observed between positive CRM 0-mm and 0·1–0·9-mm groups after controlling for other prognostic variables. Both groups had poorer survival than matched patients with a CRM at least 1 mm clear of tumour cells. Among patients with a positive CRM of less than 1 mm, those undergoing observation alone had a median survival of 18·6 months, whereas survival was a median of 10 months longer in patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy, but otherwise matched for prognostic variables (P = 0·009).


Conclusion
A positive CRM of 1 mm or less should be regarded as involved. Adjuvant radiotherapy confers a significant survival benefit in selected patients with an involved CRM.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9121" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Surgical aphorisms</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9121</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Surgical aphorisms</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">B. Campbell</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-19T03:08:33.925517-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9121</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9121</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9121</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Centenary collection</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A Christmas cracker</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
A Christmas cracker
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9098" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Surgical publishing</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9098</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Surgical publishing</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R. D. Madoff</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-22T10:04:55.300241-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9098</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9098</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9098</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Centenary collection</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">847</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">849</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Who pays?</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
Who pays?
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9137" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Thoracic aortic aneurysms</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9137</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thoracic aortic aneurysms</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. D. Bicknell, J. T. Powell</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9137</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9137</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9137</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Leading article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">850</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">852</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Still uncertainty about the need for treatment</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
Still uncertainty about the need for treatment
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9118" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative peritoneal lavage for colorectal cancer staging</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9118</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative peritoneal lavage for colorectal cancer staging</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. C. Bosanquet, D. A. Harris, M. D. Evans, J. Beynon</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-27T09:32:28.869009-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9118</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9118</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9118</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Systematic review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">853</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">862</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9118-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Intraperitoneal cancer cells are detectable at the time of colorectal cancer resection in some patients. The significance of this, particularly in patients with no other adverse prognostic features, is poorly defined. Consequently peritoneal lavage is not part of routine practice during colorectal cancer resection, in contrast with other abdominal malignancies. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effect of positive intraoperative peritoneal cytology on cancer-specific outcomes in colorectal cancer.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9118-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A systematic review of key electronic journal databases was undertaken using the search terms ‘peritoneal cytology’ and ‘colorectal’ from 1980 to 2012. Studies including patients with frank peritoneal metastasis were excluded. Meta-analysis for overall survival, local/peritoneal recurrence and overall recurrence was performed.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9118-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Twelve cohort studies (2580 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The weighted mean yield was 11·6 (range 2·2–41) per cent. Yield rates were dependent on timing of sampling (before resection, 11·8 per cent; after resection, 13·2 per cent) and detection methods used (cytopathology, 8·4 per cent; immunocytochemistry, 28·3 per cent; polymerase chain reaction, 14·5 per cent). Meta-analysis showed that positive peritoneal lavage predicted worse overall survival (odds ratio (OR) 4·26, 95 per cent confidence interval 2·86 to 6·36; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001), local/peritoneal recurrence (OR 6·57, 2·30 to 18·79; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001) and overall recurrence (OR 4·02, 2·24 to 7·22; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001).</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9118-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Evidence of intraoperative peritoneal tumour cells at colorectal cancer resection is predictive of adverse cancer outcomes.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Intraperitoneal cancer cells are detectable at the time of colorectal cancer resection in some patients. The significance of this, particularly in patients with no other adverse prognostic features, is poorly defined. Consequently peritoneal lavage is not part of routine practice during colorectal cancer resection, in contrast with other abdominal malignancies. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effect of positive intraoperative peritoneal cytology on cancer-specific outcomes in colorectal cancer.


Methods
A systematic review of key electronic journal databases was undertaken using the search terms ‘peritoneal cytology’ and ‘colorectal’ from 1980 to 2012. Studies including patients with frank peritoneal metastasis were excluded. Meta-analysis for overall survival, local/peritoneal recurrence and overall recurrence was performed.


Results
Twelve cohort studies (2580 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The weighted mean yield was 11·6 (range 2·2–41) per cent. Yield rates were dependent on timing of sampling (before resection, 11·8 per cent; after resection, 13·2 per cent) and detection methods used (cytopathology, 8·4 per cent; immunocytochemistry, 28·3 per cent; polymerase chain reaction, 14·5 per cent). Meta-analysis showed that positive peritoneal lavage predicted worse overall survival (odds ratio (OR) 4·26, 95 per cent confidence interval 2·86 to 6·36; P &lt; 0·001), local/peritoneal recurrence (OR 6·57, 2·30 to 18·79; P &lt; 0·001) and overall recurrence (OR 4·02, 2·24 to 7·22; P &lt; 0·001).


Conclusion
Evidence of intraoperative peritoneal tumour cells at colorectal cancer resection is predictive of adverse cancer outcomes.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9101" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9101</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">P. W. Stather, D. Sidloff, N. Dattani, E. Choke, M. J. Bown, R. D. Sayers</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-08T07:32:01.499676-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9101</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9101</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9101</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Meta-analyses</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">863</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">872</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9101-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Any possible long-term benefit from endovascular (EVAR) <i>versus</i> open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains unproven. Long-term data from the Open <em>Versus</em> Endovascular Repair (OVER) trial add to the debate regarding long-term all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate 30-day and long-term mortality, reintervention, rupture and morbidity after EVAR and open repair for AAA in a systematic review.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9101-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Standard PRISMA guidelines were followed. Random-effects Mantel–Haenszel meta-analysis was performed to evaluate mortality and morbidity outcomes.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9101-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>The existing published randomized trials, together with information from Medicare and SwedVasc databases, were included in a meta-analysis. This included 25 078 patients undergoing EVAR and 27 142 undergoing open repair for AAA. Patients who had EVAR had a significantly lower 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate (1·3 per cent <i>versus</i> 4·7 per cent for open repair; odds ratio (OR) 0·36, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·21 to 0·61; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001). By 2-year follow-up there was no difference in all-cause mortality (14·3 <i>versus</i> 15·2 per cent; OR 0·87, 0·72 to 1·06; <i>P</i> = 0·17), which was maintained after at least 4 years of follow-up (34·7 <i>versus</i> 33·8 per cent; OR 1·11, 0·91 to 1·35; <i>P</i> = 0·30). There was no significant difference in aneurysm-related mortality by 2 years or longer follow-up. A significantly higher proportion of patients undergoing EVAR required reintervention (<i>P</i> = 0·003) and suffered aneurysm rupture (<i>P</i> &lt; 0·001).</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9101-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>There is no long-term survival benefit for patients who have EVAR compared with open repair for AAA. There are also significantly higher risks of reintervention and aneurysm rupture after EVAR.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Any possible long-term benefit from endovascular (EVAR) versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains unproven. Long-term data from the Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) trial add to the debate regarding long-term all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate 30-day and long-term mortality, reintervention, rupture and morbidity after EVAR and open repair for AAA in a systematic review.


Methods
Standard PRISMA guidelines were followed. Random-effects Mantel–Haenszel meta-analysis was performed to evaluate mortality and morbidity outcomes.


Results
The existing published randomized trials, together with information from Medicare and SwedVasc databases, were included in a meta-analysis. This included 25 078 patients undergoing EVAR and 27 142 undergoing open repair for AAA. Patients who had EVAR had a significantly lower 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate (1·3 per cent versus 4·7 per cent for open repair; odds ratio (OR) 0·36, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·21 to 0·61; P &lt; 0·001). By 2-year follow-up there was no difference in all-cause mortality (14·3 versus 15·2 per cent; OR 0·87, 0·72 to 1·06; P = 0·17), which was maintained after at least 4 years of follow-up (34·7 versus 33·8 per cent; OR 1·11, 0·91 to 1·35; P = 0·30). There was no significant difference in aneurysm-related mortality by 2 years or longer follow-up. A significantly higher proportion of patients undergoing EVAR required reintervention (P = 0·003) and suffered aneurysm rupture (P &lt; 0·001).


Conclusion
There is no long-term survival benefit for patients who have EVAR compared with open repair for AAA. There are also significantly higher risks of reintervention and aneurysm rupture after EVAR.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9136" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta-analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9136</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta-analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. Iacono, G. Verlato, A. Ruzzenente, T. Campagnaro, C. Bacchelli, A. Valdegamberi, L. Bortolasi, A. Guglielmi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9136</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9136</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9136</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Meta-analyses</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">873</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">885</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9136-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Central pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing surgical procedure that enables the removal of benign and/or low-grade malignant lesions from the neck and proximal body of the pancreas. The aim of this review was to evaluate the short- and long-term surgical results of CP from all published studies, and the results of comparative studies of CP <i>versus</i> distal pancreatectomy (DP)</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9136-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Eligible studies published between 1988 and 2010 were reviewed systematically. Comparisons between CP and DP were pooled and analysed by meta-analytical techniques using random- or fixed-effects models, as appropriate</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9136-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Ninety-four studies, involving 963 patients undergoing CP, were identified. Postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula rates were 45·3 and 40·9 per cent respectively. Endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was reported in 5·0 and 9·9 per cent of patients. The overall mortality rate was 0·8 per cent. Compared with DP, CP had a higher postoperative morbidity rate and a higher incidence of pancreatic fistula, but a lower risk of endocrine insufficiency (relative risk (RR) 0·22, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·14 to 0·35; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001). The risk of exocrine failure was also lower after CP, although this was not significant (RR 0·59, 0·32 to 1·07; <i>P</i> = 0·082)</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9136-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>CP is a safe procedure with good long-term functional reserve. In situations where DP represents an alternative, CP is associated with a slightly higher risk of early complications</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Central pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing surgical procedure that enables the removal of benign and/or low-grade malignant lesions from the neck and proximal body of the pancreas. The aim of this review was to evaluate the short- and long-term surgical results of CP from all published studies, and the results of comparative studies of CP versus distal pancreatectomy (DP).


Methods
Eligible studies published between 1988 and 2010 were reviewed systematically. Comparisons between CP and DP were pooled and analysed by meta-analytical techniques using random- or fixed-effects models, as appropriate.


Results
Ninety-four studies, involving 963 patients undergoing CP, were identified. Postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula rates were 45·3 and 40·9 per cent respectively. Endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was reported in 5·0 and 9·9 per cent of patients. The overall mortality rate was 0·8 per cent. Compared with DP, CP had a higher postoperative morbidity rate and a higher incidence of pancreatic fistula, but a lower risk of endocrine insufficiency (relative risk (RR) 0·22, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·14 to 0·35; P &lt; 0·001). The risk of exocrine failure was also lower after CP, although this was not significant (RR 0·59, 0·32 to 1·07; P = 0·082).


Conclusion
CP is a safe procedure with good long-term functional reserve. In situations where DP represents an alternative, CP is associated with a slightly higher risk of early complications.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9133" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9133</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. H. Rosenmüller, M. Thorén Örnberg, T. Myrnäs, O. Lundberg, E. Nilsson, M. M. Haapamäki</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9133</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9133</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9133</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Randomized clinical trial</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">886</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">894</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9133-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Several randomized clinical trials have compared laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and small-incision open cholecystectomy (SIOC). Most have had wide exclusion criteria and none was expertise-based. The aim of this expertise-based randomized trial was to compare healthcare costs, quality of life (QoL), pain and clinical outcomes after LC and SIOC</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9133-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were randomized to treatment by one of two teams of surgeons with a preference for either LC or SIOC. Each team performed their specific method (SIOC or LC) as a first-choice operation, but converted to open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration when necessary. Intraoperative cholangiography was carried out routinely. The intention was to include all patients undergoing cholecystectomy, including emergency operations and procedures involving surgical training for residents</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9133-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Some 74·9 per cent of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy were included. Of 355 patients randomized, 333 were analysed. Self-estimated QoL scores in 258 patients, analysed by the area under the curve method, were significantly lower in the SIOC group at 1 month after surgery: median 2326 (95 per cent confidence interval 2187 to 2391) compared with 2411 (2334 to 2502) for the LC group (<i>P</i> = 0·030). The mean(s.d.) duration of operation was shorter for SIOC: 97(41) <i>versus</i> 120(48) min (<i>P</i> &lt; 0·001). There were no significant differences between the groups in conversion rate, pain, complications, length of hospital stay or readmissions</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9133-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>SIOC had comparable surgical results but slightly worse short-term QoL compared with LC. Registration number: NCT00370344</b> (<!--TODO: clickthrough URL--><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov" title="Link to external resource: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</a>).</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Several randomized clinical trials have compared laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and small-incision open cholecystectomy (SIOC). Most have had wide exclusion criteria and none was expertise-based. The aim of this expertise-based randomized trial was to compare healthcare costs, quality of life (QoL), pain and clinical outcomes after LC and SIOC.


Methods
Patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were randomized to treatment by one of two teams of surgeons with a preference for either LC or SIOC. Each team performed their specific method (SIOC or LC) as a first-choice operation, but converted to open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration when necessary. Intraoperative cholangiography was carried out routinely. The intention was to include all patients undergoing cholecystectomy, including emergency operations and procedures involving surgical training for residents.


Results
Some 74·9 per cent of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy were included. Of 355 patients randomized, 333 were analysed. Self-estimated QoL scores in 258 patients, analysed by the area under the curve method, were significantly lower in the SIOC group at 1 month after surgery: median 2326 (95 per cent confidence interval 2187 to 2391) compared with 2411 (2334 to 2502) for the LC group (P = 0·030). The mean(s.d.) duration of operation was shorter for SIOC: 97(41) versus 120(48) min (P &lt; 0·001). There were no significant differences between the groups in conversion rate, pain, complications, length of hospital stay or readmissions.


Conclusion
SIOC had comparable surgical results but slightly worse short-term QoL compared with LC. Registration number: NCT00370344 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9128" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Lymphangiogenesis in abdominal aortic aneurysm</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9128</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lymphangiogenesis in abdominal aortic aneurysm</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. J. A. Scott, C. J. Allen, C. A. Honstvet, A. M. Hanby, C. Hammond, A. B. Johnson, S. L. Perry, P. F. Jones</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9128</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9128</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9128</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">895</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">903</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9128-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Ongoing angiogenesis is implicated in the inflammatory environment that characterizes abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Although lymphangiogenesis has been associated with chronic inflammatory conditions, it has yet to be demonstrated in AAA. The aim was to determine the presence of lymphangiogenesis and to delineate the relationship between inflammation and neovascularization in AAA tissue.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9128-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>AAA samples and preoperative computed tomography images were obtained from patients undergoing elective AAA repair. Control samples were age-matched abdominal aortic tissue. Specific immunostains for blood vessels (CD31, CD105), lymphatic vessels (D2-40), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 3 allowed characterization and quantitation of vasculature.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9128-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>The AAA wall contained high levels of inflammatory infiltrate; microvascular densities of blood (<i>P</i> &lt; 0·001) and lymphatic (<i>P</i> = 0·003) vessels were significantly increased in AAA samples compared with controls. Maximal AAA vascularity was observed in inflammatory areas, with vessels that stained positively for CD31 (ρ = 0·625, <i>P</i> = 0·017), CD105 (ρ = 0·692, <i>P</i> = 0·009) and D2-40 (ρ = 0·675, <i>P</i> = 0·008) correlating positively with the extent of inflammation. Increased VEGFR-3 and VEGF-A expression was also evident within inflammatory AAA areas.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9128-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>These findings demonstrated lymphatic vessel involvement in end-stage AAA disease, which was associated with the degree of inflammation, and confirmed the involvement of neovascularization.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Ongoing angiogenesis is implicated in the inflammatory environment that characterizes abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Although lymphangiogenesis has been associated with chronic inflammatory conditions, it has yet to be demonstrated in AAA. The aim was to determine the presence of lymphangiogenesis and to delineate the relationship between inflammation and neovascularization in AAA tissue.


Methods
AAA samples and preoperative computed tomography images were obtained from patients undergoing elective AAA repair. Control samples were age-matched abdominal aortic tissue. Specific immunostains for blood vessels (CD31, CD105), lymphatic vessels (D2-40), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 3 allowed characterization and quantitation of vasculature.


Results
The AAA wall contained high levels of inflammatory infiltrate; microvascular densities of blood (P &lt; 0·001) and lymphatic (P = 0·003) vessels were significantly increased in AAA samples compared with controls. Maximal AAA vascularity was observed in inflammatory areas, with vessels that stained positively for CD31 (ρ = 0·625, P = 0·017), CD105 (ρ = 0·692, P = 0·009) and D2-40 (ρ = 0·675, P = 0·008) correlating positively with the extent of inflammation. Increased VEGFR-3 and VEGF-A expression was also evident within inflammatory AAA areas.


Conclusion
These findings demonstrated lymphatic vessel involvement in end-stage AAA disease, which was associated with the degree of inflammation, and confirmed the involvement of neovascularization.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9131" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Prevention of postsurgical adhesions using an ultrapure alginate-based gel</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9131</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prevention of postsurgical adhesions using an ultrapure alginate-based gel</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A. A. Chaturvedi, R. M. L. M. Lomme, T. Hendriks, H. van Goor</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-17T04:26:58.887772-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9131</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9131</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9131</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">904</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">910</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9131-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Postoperative adhesion formation is a common consequence of abdominal surgery, and constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated an ultrapure alginate-based antiadhesive barrier gel</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9131-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Experiments were performed in a rat model with caecal abrasion and peritoneal side wall excision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adhesions at 14 days after surgery. In experiment 1 (24 rats), animals treated with alginate gel were compared with controls that had no antiadhesive barrier. In experiment 2 (42 rats), alginate gel was compared with sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose (HA/CMC) membrane and with no antiadhesive barrier. To check for any remote action of the gel, in experiment 3 (45 rats) application of alginate gel to the ipsilateral <i>versus</i> contralateral side of injury was compared with no antiadhesive barrier</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9131-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>In experiment 1, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions from eight of 12 in control animals to one in 12 (<i>P</i> = 0·009). Tissue healing assessed by histology was similar in both groups. In experiment 2, ultrapure alginate gel and HA/CMC membrane showed similar antiadhesive effectiveness, reducing the incidence of adhesions from ten of 14 rats in the control group to three of 14 (<i>P</i> = 0·021) and two of 14 (<i>P</i> = 0·006) respectively. In experiment 3, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions at the site of direct application (1 of 15) compared with controls (13 of 15; <i>P</i> = 0·001), but not if applied remotely (9 of 15; <i>P</i> = 0·214)</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9131-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Ultrapure alginate gel decreased the incidence of postoperative adhesion formation in this rat model.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Postoperative adhesion formation is a common consequence of abdominal surgery, and constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated an ultrapure alginate-based antiadhesive barrier gel.


Methods
Experiments were performed in a rat model with caecal abrasion and peritoneal side wall excision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adhesions at 14 days after surgery. In experiment 1 (24 rats), animals treated with alginate gel were compared with controls that had no antiadhesive barrier. In experiment 2 (42 rats), alginate gel was compared with sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose (HA/CMC) membrane and with no antiadhesive barrier. To check for any remote action of the gel, in experiment 3 (45 rats) application of alginate gel to the ipsilateral versus contralateral side of injury was compared with no antiadhesive barrier.


Results
In experiment 1, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions from eight of 12 in control animals to one in 12 (P = 0·009). Tissue healing assessed by histology was similar in both groups. In experiment 2, ultrapure alginate gel and HA/CMC membrane showed similar antiadhesive effectiveness, reducing the incidence of adhesions from ten of 14 rats in the control group to three of 14 (P = 0·021) and two of 14 (P = 0·006) respectively. In experiment 3, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions at the site of direct application (1 of 15) compared with controls (13 of 15; P = 0·001), but not if applied remotely (9 of 15; P = 0·214).


Conclusion
Ultrapure alginate gel decreased the incidence of postoperative adhesion formation in this rat model.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9115" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Transgastric appendicectomy</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9115</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Transgastric appendicectomy</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">G. Kaehler, M. B. Schoenberg, P. Kienle, S. Post, R. Magdeburg</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-11T03:24:30.195733-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9115</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9115</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9115</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">911</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">915</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9115-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Experimental studies and small anecdotal reports have documented the potential and feasibility of transgastric appendicectomy. This paper reports the results of the new technique in a selected group of patients</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9115-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>From April 2010 transgastric appendicectomy was offered to all patients with acute appendicitis, but without generalized peritonitis or local contraindications</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9115-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Of 111 eligible patients 15 agreed to undergo the transgastric operation. After conversion of the first case to laparoscopy because of severe inflammation and adhesions, the following 14 consecutive transgastric procedures were completed. Two patients with initial peritonitis required laparoscopic lavage 4 days after transgastric appendicectomy, but no leaks were detected at the appendiceal stump or stomach</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9115-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>These preliminary results have shown the feasibility of this innovative procedure. Additional studies, however, are required to demonstrate the specific advantages and disadvantages of this approach, and define its role in clinical surgery</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Experimental studies and small anecdotal reports have documented the potential and feasibility of transgastric appendicectomy. This paper reports the results of the new technique in a selected group of patients.


Methods
From April 2010 transgastric appendicectomy was offered to all patients with acute appendicitis, but without generalized peritonitis or local contraindications.


Results
Of 111 eligible patients 15 agreed to undergo the transgastric operation. After conversion of the first case to laparoscopy because of severe inflammation and adhesions, the following 14 consecutive transgastric procedures were completed. Two patients with initial peritonitis required laparoscopic lavage 4 days after transgastric appendicectomy, but no leaks were detected at the appendiceal stump or stomach.


Conclusion
These preliminary results have shown the feasibility of this innovative procedure. Additional studies, however, are required to demonstrate the specific advantages and disadvantages of this approach, and define its role in clinical surgery.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9116" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Transgastric appendicectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 911–915)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9116</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Transgastric appendicectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 911–915)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R. A. Cahill</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9116</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9116</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9116</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Commentary</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">915</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">916</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9135" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9135</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">U. Boggi, S. Signori, N. De Lio, V. G. Perrone, F. Vistoli, M. Belluomini, C. Cappelli, G. Amorese, F. Mosca</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9135</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9135</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9135</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">917</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">925</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9135-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, but requires adaptations to established surgical techniques. The improved dexterity offered by robotic assistance provides the opportunity to see whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely when faithfully reproducing the open operation.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9135-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Patients were selected for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy when generally suitable for laparoscopy. Obese patients were excluded, and those with pancreatic cancer were highly selected. A prospectively designed database was used for data collection and analysis.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9135-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Of 238 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 34 (14·3 per cent) were operated on robotically. No procedure was converted to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery, despite three patients requiring segmental resection of the superior mesenteric/portal vein and reconstruction. The mean duration of operation was 597 (range 420–960) min. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved and analysed from patients with neoplasia was 32 (range 15–76). Four patients required blood transfusions and five developed postoperative complications exceeding Clavien–Dindo grade II. There were four grade B pancreatic fistulas. One patient died on postoperative day 40. Excess mean operative cost compared with open resection was €6193.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9135-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Selected patients can safely undergo robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The main downsides are high costs and prolonged operating times compared with open resection.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, but requires adaptations to established surgical techniques. The improved dexterity offered by robotic assistance provides the opportunity to see whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely when faithfully reproducing the open operation.


Methods
Patients were selected for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy when generally suitable for laparoscopy. Obese patients were excluded, and those with pancreatic cancer were highly selected. A prospectively designed database was used for data collection and analysis.


Results
Of 238 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 34 (14·3 per cent) were operated on robotically. No procedure was converted to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery, despite three patients requiring segmental resection of the superior mesenteric/portal vein and reconstruction. The mean duration of operation was 597 (range 420–960) min. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved and analysed from patients with neoplasia was 32 (range 15–76). Four patients required blood transfusions and five developed postoperative complications exceeding Clavien–Dindo grade II. There were four grade B pancreatic fistulas. One patient died on postoperative day 40. Excess mean operative cost compared with open resection was €6193.


Conclusion
Selected patients can safely undergo robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The main downsides are high costs and prolonged operating times compared with open resection.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9132" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Repeat liver resection for colorectal metastases</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9132</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Repeat liver resection for colorectal metastases</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">U. Kulik, H. Bektas, J. Klempnauer, F. Lehner</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9132</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9132</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9132</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">926</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">932</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9132-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) up to 75 per cent of patients develop recurrent liver metastases. Although repeat resection remains the only curative therapy, data evaluating the outcome are deficient. This study analysed postoperative morbidity, mortality and independent predictors of survival following repeat resection of CLMs</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9132-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Data on surgical treatment of primary and recurrent CLMs between 1994 and 2010 were collected retrospectively, and compared with those for single hepatic resections carried out during the same period. Independent predictors of survival were evaluated by means of univariable and multivariable Cox regression models</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9132-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>In this interval 1026 primary resections of CLMs were performed and 94 patients underwent repeat CLM excision. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were low (15·8 and 1·3 per cent respectively), with no statistical difference in patients undergoing repeat surgery (<i>P</i> = 0·072). Compared with single liver resections, overall survival was improved in repeat resections (<em>P</em> = 0·003). Multivariable analysis revealed that size of primary CLM over 50 mm was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2·61; <i>P</i> = 0·008). Only major hepatic resection was associated with poorer outcome following repeat surgery (HR 2·62; <i>P</i> = 0·009). International Union Against Cancer stage, number of CLMs, age at surgery and need for intraoperative transfusion had no impact on survival after repeat resection</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9132-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Recurrent CLM surgery is feasible with similar morbidity and mortality rates to those of initial or single CLM resections</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) up to 75 per cent of patients develop recurrent liver metastases. Although repeat resection remains the only curative therapy, data evaluating the outcome are deficient. This study analysed postoperative morbidity, mortality and independent predictors of survival following repeat resection of CLMs.


Methods
Data on surgical treatment of primary and recurrent CLMs between 1994 and 2010 were collected retrospectively, and compared with those for single hepatic resections carried out during the same period. Independent predictors of survival were evaluated by means of univariable and multivariable Cox regression models.


Results
In this interval 1026 primary resections of CLMs were performed and 94 patients underwent repeat CLM excision. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were low (15·8 and 1·3 per cent respectively), with no statistical difference in patients undergoing repeat surgery (P = 0·072). Compared with single liver resections, overall survival was improved in repeat resections (P = 0·003). Multivariable analysis revealed that size of primary CLM over 50 mm was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2·61; P = 0·008). Only major hepatic resection was associated with poorer outcome following repeat surgery (HR 2·62; P = 0·009). International Union Against Cancer stage, number of CLMs, age at surgery and need for intraoperative transfusion had no impact on survival after repeat resection.


Conclusion
Recurrent CLM surgery is feasible with similar morbidity and mortality rates to those of initial or single CLM resections.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9112" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9112</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. A. M. Sloothaak, D. E. Geijsen, N. J. van Leersum, C. J. A. Punt, C. J. Buskens, W. A. Bemelman, P. J. Tanis, </dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-27T09:27:04.569634-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9112</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9112</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9112</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">933</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">939</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9112-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been proven to increase local control in rectal cancer, but the optimal interval between CRT and surgery is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of variations in clinical practice regarding timing of surgery on pathological response at a population level</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9112-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>All evaluable patients who underwent preoperative CRT for rectal cancer between 2009 and 2011 were selected from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. The interval between radiotherapy and surgery was calculated from the start of radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; pathological status after chemoradiotherapy (yp) T0 N0).</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9112-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>A total of 1593 patients were included. The median interval between radiotherapy and surgery was 14 (range 6–85, interquartile range 12–16) weeks. Outcome measures were calculated for intervals of less than 13 weeks (312 patients), 13–14 weeks (511 patients), 15–16 weeks (406 patients) and more than 16 weeks (364 patients). Age, tumour location and R0 resection rate were distributed equally between the four groups; significant differences were found for clinical tumour category (cT4: 17·3, 18·4, 24·5 and 26·6 per cent respectively; <i>P</i> = 0·010) and clinical metastasis category (cM1: 4·4, 4·8, 8·9 and 14·9 per cent respectively; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001). Resection 15–16 weeks after the start of CRT resulted in the highest pCR rate (18·0 per cent; <i>P</i> = 0·013), with an independent association (hazard ratio 1·63, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·20 to 2·23). Results for secondary endpoints in the group with an interval of 15–16 weeks were: tumour downstaging, 55·2 per cent (<i>P</i> = 0·165); nodal downstaging, 58·6 per cent (<i>P</i> = 0·036); and (near)-complete response, 23·2 per cent (<i>P</i> = 0·124).</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9112-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Delaying surgery until the 15th or 16th week after the start of CRT (10–11 weeks from the end of CRT) seemed to result in the highest chance of a pCR.</b></p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been proven to increase local control in rectal cancer, but the optimal interval between CRT and surgery is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of variations in clinical practice regarding timing of surgery on pathological response at a population level.


Methods
All evaluable patients who underwent preoperative CRT for rectal cancer between 2009 and 2011 were selected from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. The interval between radiotherapy and surgery was calculated from the start of radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; pathological status after chemoradiotherapy (yp) T0 N0).


Results
A total of 1593 patients were included. The median interval between radiotherapy and surgery was 14 (range 6–85, interquartile range 12–16) weeks. Outcome measures were calculated for intervals of less than 13 weeks (312 patients), 13–14 weeks (511 patients), 15–16 weeks (406 patients) and more than 16 weeks (364 patients). Age, tumour location and R0 resection rate were distributed equally between the four groups; significant differences were found for clinical tumour category (cT4: 17·3, 18·4, 24·5 and 26·6 per cent respectively; P = 0·010) and clinical metastasis category (cM1: 4·4, 4·8, 8·9 and 14·9 per cent respectively; P &lt; 0·001). Resection 15–16 weeks after the start of CRT resulted in the highest pCR rate (18·0 per cent; P = 0·013), with an independent association (hazard ratio 1·63, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·20 to 2·23). Results for secondary endpoints in the group with an interval of 15–16 weeks were: tumour downstaging, 55·2 per cent (P = 0·165); nodal downstaging, 58·6 per cent (P = 0·036); and (near)-complete response, 23·2 per cent (P = 0·124).


Conclusion
Delaying surgery until the 15th or 16th week after the start of CRT (10–11 weeks from the end of CRT) seemed to result in the highest chance of a pCR.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9130" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 933–939)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9130</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 933–939)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. A. Harris</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9130</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9130</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9130</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Commentary</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">939</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">940</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9144" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9144</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J. Andersson, E. Angenete, M. Gellerstedt, U. Angerås, P. Jess, J. Rosenberg, A. Fürst, J. Bonjer, E. Haglind</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9144</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9144</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9144</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">941</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">949</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9144-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgical techniques have reported improved health-related quality of life (HRQL). This analysis compared HRQL 12 months after laparoscopic <i>versus</i> open surgery for rectal cancer in a subset of a randomized trial.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9144-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>The setting was a multicentre randomized trial (COLOR II) comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Involvement in the HRQL study of COLOR II was optional. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and EuroQol – 5D (EQ-5D™) before surgery, and 4 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation. Analysis was done according to the manual for each instrument.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9144-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Of 617 patients in hospitals participating in the HRQL study of COLOR II, 385 were included. The HRQL deteriorated to moderate/severe degrees after surgery, gradually returning to preoperative values over time. Changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and EQ-5D™ were not significantly different between the groups regarding global health score or any of the dimensions or symptoms at 4 weeks, 6 or 12 months after surgery.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9144-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>In contrast to previous studies in patients with colonic cancer, HRQL after rectal cancer surgery was not affected by surgical approach. Registration number: NCT0029779</b> (<!--TODO: clickthrough URL--><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov" title="Link to external resource: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</a>).</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgical techniques have reported improved health-related quality of life (HRQL). This analysis compared HRQL 12 months after laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a subset of a randomized trial.


Methods
The setting was a multicentre randomized trial (COLOR II) comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Involvement in the HRQL study of COLOR II was optional. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and EuroQol – 5D (EQ-5D™) before surgery, and 4 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation. Analysis was done according to the manual for each instrument.


Results
Of 617 patients in hospitals participating in the HRQL study of COLOR II, 385 were included. The HRQL deteriorated to moderate/severe degrees after surgery, gradually returning to preoperative values over time. Changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and EQ-5D™ were not significantly different between the groups regarding global health score or any of the dimensions or symptoms at 4 weeks, 6 or 12 months after surgery.


Conclusion
In contrast to previous studies in patients with colonic cancer, HRQL after rectal cancer surgery was not affected by surgical approach. Registration number: NCT0029779 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9113" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Surgical resection of recurrent colonic cancer</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9113</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Surgical resection of recurrent colonic cancer</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. P. Harji, P. M. Sagar, K. Boyle, B. Griffiths, D. R. McArthur, M. Evans</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-27T09:31:47.309311-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9113</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9113</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9113</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">950</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">958</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9113-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Locoregional recurrence of colonic cancer includes anastomotic recurrence, associated nodal masses, masses that involve the abdominal wall and pelvic masses. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of resection of such recurrences and to provide guidance on the management of this disease</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9113-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Data were obtained on demographics, surgical procedure, morbidity, histopathology and outcome. Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors influencing survival were performed using stepwise Cox logistic regression</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9113-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Forty-two patients (21 men; median age 61 (range 41–82) years) underwent resection of recurrent colonic cancer between 2003 and 2011. The median interval between resection of the primary and recurrent colonic tumour was 37·5 (interquartile range 7–91) months. The recurrences developed at the previous anastomosis (9 patients), elsewhere within the abdominal cavity or wall (8) and as discrete masses within the pelvic cavity (25). Eighteen of 42 patients underwent resection of hepatic or pulmonary metastases at some stage after resection of the primary tumour. Median survival was 29 months after R0 resection and 26 months after R1 resection of the recurrent tumour (<i>P</i> = 0·226). The survival benefit depended on the location of the recurrence (median survival after resection of recurrent disease: anastomotic 33 months, pelvic 26 months, abdominal 19 months; <i>P</i> = 0·010)</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9113-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>This study described a classification system, management algorithm and prognostic factors for recurrent colonic cancer. The distribution of disease influenced survival. Long-term survival was achieved, including a subset of patients with drop metastases and/or previous metastasectomy</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Locoregional recurrence of colonic cancer includes anastomotic recurrence, associated nodal masses, masses that involve the abdominal wall and pelvic masses. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of resection of such recurrences and to provide guidance on the management of this disease.


Methods
Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Data were obtained on demographics, surgical procedure, morbidity, histopathology and outcome. Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors influencing survival were performed using stepwise Cox logistic regression.


Results
Forty-two patients (21 men; median age 61 (range 41–82) years) underwent resection of recurrent colonic cancer between 2003 and 2011. The median interval between resection of the primary and recurrent colonic tumour was 37·5 (interquartile range 7–91) months. The recurrences developed at the previous anastomosis (9 patients), elsewhere within the abdominal cavity or wall (8) and as discrete masses within the pelvic cavity (25). Eighteen of 42 patients underwent resection of hepatic or pulmonary metastases at some stage after resection of the primary tumour. Median survival was 29 months after R0 resection and 26 months after R1 resection of the recurrent tumour (P = 0·226). The survival benefit depended on the location of the recurrence (median survival after resection of recurrent disease: anastomotic 33 months, pelvic 26 months, abdominal 19 months; P = 0·010).


Conclusion
This study described a classification system, management algorithm and prognostic factors for recurrent colonic cancer. The distribution of disease influenced survival. Long-term survival was achieved, including a subset of patients with drop metastases and/or previous metastasectomy.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9114" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The effect of sacral nerve stimulation on distal colonic motility in patients with faecal incontinence</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9114</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The effect of sacral nerve stimulation on distal colonic motility in patients with faecal incontinence</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">V. Patton, L. Wiklendt, J. W. Arkwright, D. Z. Lubowski, P. G. Dinning</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-27T09:26:59.761906-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9114</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9114</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9114</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">959</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">968</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9114-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective treatment for neurogenic faecal incontinence (FI). However, the clinical improvement that patients experience cannot be explained adequately by changes in anorectal function. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of SNS on colonic propagating sequences (PSs) in patients with FI in whom urgency and incontinence was the predominant symptom</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9114-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>In patients with FI a high-resolution fibre-optic manometry catheter, containing 90 sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, was positioned colonoscopically and clipped to the caecum. A unipolar or quadripolar tined electrode was implanted into the S3 sacral nerve foramen. Colonic manometry was evaluated in a double-blind randomized crossover trial, using true suprasensory stimulation or sham stimulation. Each stimulation period, lasting 2 h, was preceded by a 2-h basal manometric recording</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9114-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>All 11 patients studied showed a colonic response to SNS. In ten patients there was a significant increase in the frequency of retrograde PSs throughout the colon during true stimulation compared with sham stimulation (<i>P</i> = 0·014). In one outlier, with baseline retrograde PS frequency nine times that of the nearest patient, a reduction in retrograde PS frequency was recorded. Compared with sham stimulation, SNS had no effect on the frequency of antegrade PSs or high-amplitude PSs</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9114-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>SNS modulates colonic motility in patients with faecal urge incontinence. These data suggest that SNS may improve continence and urgency through alteration of colonic motility, particularly by increasing retrograde PSs in the left colon</b>.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective treatment for neurogenic faecal incontinence (FI). However, the clinical improvement that patients experience cannot be explained adequately by changes in anorectal function. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of SNS on colonic propagating sequences (PSs) in patients with FI in whom urgency and incontinence was the predominant symptom.


Methods
In patients with FI a high-resolution fibre-optic manometry catheter, containing 90 sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, was positioned colonoscopically and clipped to the caecum. A unipolar or quadripolar tined electrode was implanted into the S3 sacral nerve foramen. Colonic manometry was evaluated in a double-blind randomized crossover trial, using true suprasensory stimulation or sham stimulation. Each stimulation period, lasting 2 h, was preceded by a 2-h basal manometric recording.


Results
All 11 patients studied showed a colonic response to SNS. In ten patients there was a significant increase in the frequency of retrograde PSs throughout the colon during true stimulation compared with sham stimulation (P = 0·014). In one outlier, with baseline retrograde PS frequency nine times that of the nearest patient, a reduction in retrograde PS frequency was recorded. Compared with sham stimulation, SNS had no effect on the frequency of antegrade PSs or high-amplitude PSs.


Conclusion
SNS modulates colonic motility in patients with faecal urge incontinence. These data suggest that SNS may improve continence and urgency through alteration of colonic motility, particularly by increasing retrograde PSs in the left colon.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9117" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Impaired postoperative leucocyte counts after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the Stockholm III Trial</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9117</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Impaired postoperative leucocyte counts after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the Stockholm III Trial</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Pettersson, B. Glimelius, H. Iversen, H. Johansson, T. Holm, A. Martling</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-02T06:58:09.62718-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9117</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9117</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9117</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">969</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">975</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9117-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Radiotherapy (RT) in rectal cancer increases postoperative morbidity. A suggested reason is RT-induced bone marrow depression resulting in impaired leucocyte counts. The ongoing Stockholm III Trial randomizes patients with operable rectal cancers to short-course RT with immediate surgery (SRT), short-course RT with surgery delayed for 4–8 weeks (SRT-delay) and long-course RT with surgery delayed for 4–8 weeks (LRT-delay). This study examined differences between the randomization arms regarding leucocyte response and postoperative complications.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9117-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Patients randomized in the Stockholm III Trial between October 1998 and November 2010 were included. Data were collected in a prospective register. Additional data were obtained by retrospective review of clinical records.</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9117-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Of 657 randomized patients, 585 had data on leucocytes. The SRT arm had the highest proportion of postoperative complications (SRT, 52·5 per cent; SRT-delay, 39·4 per cent; LRT-delay, 41 per cent; <i>P</i> = 0·010). There was no association between low preoperative leucocyte count and postoperative complications (<i>P</i> = 0·238). Irrespective of randomization arm, patients with an impaired postoperative to preoperative leucocyte ratio had the highest rate of complications (low ratio, 56·6 per cent; intermediate ratio, 46·9 per cent; high ratio, 36·3 per cent; <i>P</i> = 0·010). The SRT arm had the highest proportion of low ratios (SRT, 48·9 per cent; SRT-delay, 22·8 per cent; LRT-delay, 22 per cent; <i>P</i> &lt; 0·001).</b></p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9117-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>An impaired postoperative leucocyte response is associated with postoperative complications. The highest risk is with immediate surgery following short-course radiotherapy. Registration number: NCT 00904813</b> (<!--TODO: clickthrough URL--><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov" title="Link to external resource: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</a>).</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
Radiotherapy (RT) in rectal cancer increases postoperative morbidity. A suggested reason is RT-induced bone marrow depression resulting in impaired leucocyte counts. The ongoing Stockholm III Trial randomizes patients with operable rectal cancers to short-course RT with immediate surgery (SRT), short-course RT with surgery delayed for 4–8 weeks (SRT-delay) and long-course RT with surgery delayed for 4–8 weeks (LRT-delay). This study examined differences between the randomization arms regarding leucocyte response and postoperative complications.


Methods
Patients randomized in the Stockholm III Trial between October 1998 and November 2010 were included. Data were collected in a prospective register. Additional data were obtained by retrospective review of clinical records.


Results
Of 657 randomized patients, 585 had data on leucocytes. The SRT arm had the highest proportion of postoperative complications (SRT, 52·5 per cent; SRT-delay, 39·4 per cent; LRT-delay, 41 per cent; P = 0·010). There was no association between low preoperative leucocyte count and postoperative complications (P = 0·238). Irrespective of randomization arm, patients with an impaired postoperative to preoperative leucocyte ratio had the highest rate of complications (low ratio, 56·6 per cent; intermediate ratio, 46·9 per cent; high ratio, 36·3 per cent; P = 0·010). The SRT arm had the highest proportion of low ratios (SRT, 48·9 per cent; SRT-delay, 22·8 per cent; LRT-delay, 22 per cent; P &lt; 0·001).


Conclusion
An impaired postoperative leucocyte response is associated with postoperative complications. The highest risk is with immediate surgery following short-course radiotherapy. Registration number: NCT 00904813 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9120" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Impaired postoperative leucocyte counts after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the Stockholm III Trial (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 970–975)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9120</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Impaired postoperative leucocyte counts after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the Stockholm III Trial (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 970–975)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">H. Rutten</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9120</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9120</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9120</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Commentary</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">975</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">975</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Worst with short course radiotherapy</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
Worst with short course radiotherapy
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9119" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Assessment of recurrence and complications following uncomplicated diverticulitis</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9119</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Assessment of recurrence and complications following uncomplicated diverticulitis</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">N. C. Buchs, B. Konrad-Mugnier, A.-S. Jannot, P.-A. Poletti, P. Ambrosetti, P. Gervaz</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-17T04:28:24.766036-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9119</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9119</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9119</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">976</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">979</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="section" id="bjs9119-sec-0001" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p><b>The natural history of sigmoid diverticulitis has been inferred from population-based or retrospective studies. This study assessed the risk of a recurrent attack following the first episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9119-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Patients admitted between January 2007 and December 2011 with a first episode of uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis confirmed on computed tomography were enrolled in this prospective study. After successful medical management of the first episode, follow-up was conducted through yearly telephone interviews. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to model the impact of various parameters on eventual recurrences and complications</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9119-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p><b>During a median follow-up of 24 (range 3–63) months, 46 (16·4 per cent) of 280 patients experienced a second episode of diverticulitis. Six patients (2·1 per cent) subsequently developed complicated diverticulitis and four (1·4 per cent) underwent emergency surgery for peritonitis. In multivariable analysis, a raised serum level of C-reactive protein (over 240 mg/l) during the first attack was associated with early recurrence (hazard ratio 1·75, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·04 to 2·94; <i>P</i> = 0·035)</b>.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="bjs9119-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p><b>Uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis follows a benign course with few recurrences and little need for emergency surgery. Registration number: NCT01015378</b> (<!--TODO: clickthrough URL--><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov" title="Link to external resource: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</a>).</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background
The natural history of sigmoid diverticulitis has been inferred from population-based or retrospective studies. This study assessed the risk of a recurrent attack following the first episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis.


Methods
Patients admitted between January 2007 and December 2011 with a first episode of uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis confirmed on computed tomography were enrolled in this prospective study. After successful medical management of the first episode, follow-up was conducted through yearly telephone interviews. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to model the impact of various parameters on eventual recurrences and complications.


Results
During a median follow-up of 24 (range 3–63) months, 46 (16·4 per cent) of 280 patients experienced a second episode of diverticulitis. Six patients (2·1 per cent) subsequently developed complicated diverticulitis and four (1·4 per cent) underwent emergency surgery for peritonitis. In multivariable analysis, a raised serum level of C-reactive protein (over 240 mg/l) during the first attack was associated with early recurrence (hazard ratio 1·75, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·04 to 2·94; P = 0·035).


Conclusion
Uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis follows a benign course with few recurrences and little need for emergency surgery. Registration number: NCT01015378 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9148" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 144–150)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9148</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 144–150)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. Matuchansky</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9148</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9148</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9148</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Your Views</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">980</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">980</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div class="para" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (<!--TODO: clickthrough URL--><a href="http://www.bjs.co.uk" title="Link to external resource: http://www.bjs.co.uk">www.bjs.co.uk</a>). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>
The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9149" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Author's reply: Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 144–150)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9149</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Author's reply: Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 144–150)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. F. Altomare</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9149</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9149</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9149</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Your Views</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">980</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">980</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9150" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Systematic review of five feeding routes after pancreatoduodenectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 589–598)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9150</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Systematic review of five feeding routes after pancreatoduodenectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 589–598)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">F. Bozzetti</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9150</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9150</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9150</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Your Views</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">980</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">981</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9151" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Authors' reply: Systematic review of five feeding routes after pancreatoduodenectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 589–598)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9151</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Authors' reply: Systematic review of five feeding routes after pancreatoduodenectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 589–598)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A. Gerritsen, I. Q. Molenaar, M. G. Besselink</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9151</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9151</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9151</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Your Views</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">981</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">981</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9160" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Scientific Surgery</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9160</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scientific Surgery</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9160</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9160</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9160</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Scientific Surgery</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">982</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">982</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9143" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Your Views: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9143</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Your Views: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">S. Aellen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-03T04:18:11.715479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1002/bjs.9143</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1002/bjs.9143</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002%2Fbjs.9143</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Erratum</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">983</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">983</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item></rdf:RDF>