<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/rss/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2753" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice</title><description> Wiley Online Library : Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice</description><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2F%28ISSN%291365-2753</link><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en</dc:language><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">© Blackwell Publishing Ltd</dc:rights><prism:issn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1356-1294</prism:issn><prism:eIssn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1365-2753</prism:eIssn><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><prism:coverDisplayDate xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">April 2013</prism:coverDisplayDate><prism:volume xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">19</prism:volume><prism:number xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">2</prism:number><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">223</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">413</prism:endingPage><image rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/jep.2013.19.issue-2/asset/cover.gif?v=1&amp;s=7047b9f727e0ebd4ffc467da93514992dcf2871e"/><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12063"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12064"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12032"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12031"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12030"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12029"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12033"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12034"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12027"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12026"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12028"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12025"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12024"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12023"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12022"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12018"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12021"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12020"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12019"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12017"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12016"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12015"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12013"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12011"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12012"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12014"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12010"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01892.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01888.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01894.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01890.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01889.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01887.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01848.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01893.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01891.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01885.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01886.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01873.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01874.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01875.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01879.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01876.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01877.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01867.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01870.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01868.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01871.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01866.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01869.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01865.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01864.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01862.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01861.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01860.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01854.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01858.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01853.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01850.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01852.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01851.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01849.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01857.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01856.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01855.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01847.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01835.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01817.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01828.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01807.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01805.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01811.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01810.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01802.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01659.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01638.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2010.01554.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12001"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01708.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01801.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01803.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01806.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01808.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01809.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01814.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01818.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01819.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01820.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01821.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01822.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01823.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01824.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01825.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01826.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01827.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01829.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01830.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01832.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01834.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01836.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01837.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01838.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01839.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01840.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01842.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01845.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01841.x"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12063" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Evaluation of a national evidence-based health care course via teleconference in a developing country</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12063</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evaluation of a national evidence-based health care course via teleconference in a developing country</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cristiane Rufino Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho Macedo, Maria Regina Torloni, Álvaro Nagib Atallah</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-08T22:48:24.349433-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12063</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12063</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12063</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12063-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Continuing health education is essential but challenged. In 2006, the Brazilian Cochrane Center, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, launched a mass teaching initiative in evidence-based health care (EBH) for public-sector professionals via teleconferencing. This 152-hour, interactive EBH course has enrolled over 4500 professionals. This study aimed to assess the acquisition EBH knowledge and skills, as well as the attitudes and perceptions of a sample of students enrolled in the 2009 course via teleconferencing.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12063-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>This prospective cohort study analyzed three aspects of this 152-hour EBH course that recruited 1040 volunteer participants, all public health sector employees working in 131 different hospitals or health agencies. Pre- and post-course tests using a modified version of the Berlin questionnaire with 20 multiple-choice questions were used to examine knowledge acquisition in a sample of 297 students. Tests were completed upon registration and at course completion. The research projects submitted by 872 participants were evaluated to assess skill acquisition. Answers to an anonymous survey assessed the attitudes and perceptions of 914 participants.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12063-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>There was a significant increase in knowledge from baseline to course completion (mean scores 8.2 ± 3.3 versus 13.7 ± 3.0, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Over 90% of the research projects were judged to be of adequate quality (appropriate rationale for the study, well-formulated research question and feasible execution); over 95% of the participants were satisfied with the course.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12063-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>The Brazilian EBH course via teleconference improved the knowledge and skills of public-sector health professionals and was approved by the vast majority of students.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Continuing health education is essential but challenged. In 2006, the Brazilian Cochrane Center, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, launched a mass teaching initiative in evidence-based health care (EBH) for public-sector professionals via teleconferencing. This 152-hour, interactive EBH course has enrolled over 4500 professionals. This study aimed to assess the acquisition EBH knowledge and skills, as well as the attitudes and perceptions of a sample of students enrolled in the 2009 course via teleconferencing.


Methods
This prospective cohort study analyzed three aspects of this 152-hour EBH course that recruited 1040 volunteer participants, all public health sector employees working in 131 different hospitals or health agencies. Pre- and post-course tests using a modified version of the Berlin questionnaire with 20 multiple-choice questions were used to examine knowledge acquisition in a sample of 297 students. Tests were completed upon registration and at course completion. The research projects submitted by 872 participants were evaluated to assess skill acquisition. Answers to an anonymous survey assessed the attitudes and perceptions of 914 participants.


Results
There was a significant increase in knowledge from baseline to course completion (mean scores 8.2 ± 3.3 versus 13.7 ± 3.0, P &lt; 0.001). Over 90% of the research projects were judged to be of adequate quality (appropriate rationale for the study, well-formulated research question and feasible execution); over 95% of the participants were satisfied with the course.


Conclusion
The Brazilian EBH course via teleconference improved the knowledge and skills of public-sector health professionals and was approved by the vast majority of students.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12064" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A naïve approach for deriving scoring systems to support clinical decision making</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12064</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A naïve approach for deriving scoring systems to support clinical decision making</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paolo Barbini, Gabriele Cevenini, Simone Furini, Emanuela Barbini</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-07T04:06:37.682412-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12064</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12064</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12064</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12064-sec-0008" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Scoring systems are frequently proposed in medicine to summarize a set of qualitative and quantitative items by means of a numeric score. Their design often requires modelling ability and subjective judgments. This can make it difficult to adapt a scoring system to a clinical setting different from that in which the system was developed. The objective of this study was to discuss an approach to derive scoring systems, which can be easily modified and matched to any scenario.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12064-sec-0009" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A naïve Bayes approach was used to develop a scoring system that is completely defined by descriptive tables obtained by frequency counts from the training set. The approach was implemented to build a locally customized scoring system for planning transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery. The performance of this system was evaluated and compared with that of a logistic regression model designed using the same predictors. The working sample was a set of 3182 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the University Hospital of Siena, Italy.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12064-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was equal to 0.811 and 0.824 for the scoring system and for the logistic regression model, respectively. This result proves that this global index of discrimination capacity was virtually identical and very good for both models. The values of sensitivity, specificity and overall correct-classification percentage obtained by the leave-one-out method were practically the same for the two models (73.9% versus 75.3%).</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12064-sec-0011" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>An easy-fitting and trustworthy scoring system can be directly developed using a naïve Bayes approach. The simplicity of its design allows the system to be customized to any specific institution and updated regularly. This aspect has important practical implications because it can encourage the use of scoring systems among clinicians, enabling their performance to be properly assessed in a wider clinical context.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Scoring systems are frequently proposed in medicine to summarize a set of qualitative and quantitative items by means of a numeric score. Their design often requires modelling ability and subjective judgments. This can make it difficult to adapt a scoring system to a clinical setting different from that in which the system was developed. The objective of this study was to discuss an approach to derive scoring systems, which can be easily modified and matched to any scenario.


Methods
A naïve Bayes approach was used to develop a scoring system that is completely defined by descriptive tables obtained by frequency counts from the training set. The approach was implemented to build a locally customized scoring system for planning transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery. The performance of this system was evaluated and compared with that of a logistic regression model designed using the same predictors. The working sample was a set of 3182 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the University Hospital of Siena, Italy.


Results
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was equal to 0.811 and 0.824 for the scoring system and for the logistic regression model, respectively. This result proves that this global index of discrimination capacity was virtually identical and very good for both models. The values of sensitivity, specificity and overall correct-classification percentage obtained by the leave-one-out method were practically the same for the two models (73.9% versus 75.3%).


Conclusions
An easy-fitting and trustworthy scoring system can be directly developed using a naïve Bayes approach. The simplicity of its design allows the system to be customized to any specific institution and updated regularly. This aspect has important practical implications because it can encourage the use of scoring systems among clinicians, enabling their performance to be properly assessed in a wider clinical context.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12032" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Allocation concealment: a methodological review</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12032</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allocation concealment: a methodological review</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Clark, Ulrike Schmidt, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joy Adamson, Catherine Hewitt, David Torgerson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-07T04:06:27.28809-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12032</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12032</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12032</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12032-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>The accurate reporting of the trial methodology and results is essential for accurate judgement on the quality of the research. This review aims to assess the impact of the adequacy of allocation concealment on treatment effect estimates.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12032-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A search was performed in MEDLINE (via the Ovid platform) to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in January 2011 within its set of ‘core clinical journals’. Meta-regression was undertaken on a subset of two arm trials to quantify the association between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect size.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12032-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Adequate allocation concealment methods were used in 27% (<em>n</em> = 23) of included trials. There was insufficient information given in 68% (<em>n</em> = 58) of trials to make a judgement on allocation concealment. Meta-regression showed that there was a trend, not statistically significant, towards a smaller effect size between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect sizes.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12032-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>This review highlighted that research needs to be reported to a higher standard and there are many trials reporting poor methods of allocation concealment within the small sample of trials included in this review.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
The accurate reporting of the trial methodology and results is essential for accurate judgement on the quality of the research. This review aims to assess the impact of the adequacy of allocation concealment on treatment effect estimates.


Methods
A search was performed in MEDLINE (via the Ovid platform) to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in January 2011 within its set of ‘core clinical journals’. Meta-regression was undertaken on a subset of two arm trials to quantify the association between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect size.


Results
Adequate allocation concealment methods were used in 27% (n = 23) of included trials. There was insufficient information given in 68% (n = 58) of trials to make a judgement on allocation concealment. Meta-regression showed that there was a trend, not statistically significant, towards a smaller effect size between adequacy of allocation concealment and effect sizes.


Conclusion
This review highlighted that research needs to be reported to a higher standard and there are many trials reporting poor methods of allocation concealment within the small sample of trials included in this review.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12031" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12031</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Clark, Ulrike Schmidt, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joy Adamson, Catherine Hewitt, David Torgerson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-05-07T01:25:57.418289-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12031</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12031</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12031</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12031-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are powerful tools; it is essential that these trials are not only conducted rigorously, but reported accurately. The aim of this paper was to describe the reporting quality among a set of RCTs published in 2011 on methodological details essential to judging the adequacy of allocation concealment methods employed.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12031-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>Medline was searched using the Ovid platform to identify all those RCTs published in January 2011 in core clinical journals.</p></div><div class="para"><p>Methodological details in relation to allocation concealment were extracted from the identified RCTs to allow the reporting quality to be assessed. If the information was not available in the paper the corresponding author was contacted.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12031-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Eighty-five papers were identified, 74% (<em>n</em> = 63) endorsed the CONSORT statement. 73% (<em>n</em> = 62) required the author to be contacted for further information. Sequence generation methods were ascertained in 74% of trials, allocation concealment method in 41%, details of who recruited participants and who generated the randomization sequence in 38%.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12031-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>There is evidence to suggest that in 2011 key methodological information relating to allocation concealment is still not reported well in RCTs. Authors and journal editors need to ensure explicit and clear methods are reported in RCTs published.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are powerful tools; it is essential that these trials are not only conducted rigorously, but reported accurately. The aim of this paper was to describe the reporting quality among a set of RCTs published in 2011 on methodological details essential to judging the adequacy of allocation concealment methods employed.


Methods
Medline was searched using the Ovid platform to identify all those RCTs published in January 2011 in core clinical journals.
Methodological details in relation to allocation concealment were extracted from the identified RCTs to allow the reporting quality to be assessed. If the information was not available in the paper the corresponding author was contacted.


Results
Eighty-five papers were identified, 74% (n = 63) endorsed the CONSORT statement. 73% (n = 62) required the author to be contacted for further information. Sequence generation methods were ascertained in 74% of trials, allocation concealment method in 41%, details of who recruited participants and who generated the randomization sequence in 38%.


Conclusions
There is evidence to suggest that in 2011 key methodological information relating to allocation concealment is still not reported well in RCTs. Authors and journal editors need to ensure explicit and clear methods are reported in RCTs published.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12030" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Is the use of cholesterol in mortality risk algorithms in clinical guidelines valid? Ten years prospective data from the Norwegian HUNT 2 study</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12030</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Is the use of cholesterol in mortality risk algorithms in clinical guidelines valid? Ten years prospective data from the Norwegian HUNT 2 study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael d'Emden</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-22T03:31:45.338966-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12030</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12030</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12030</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Letter to the Editor</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12029" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Ethics ward rounds: a conduit to finding meaning and value in medical school</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12029</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ethics ward rounds: a conduit to finding meaning and value in medical school</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Parker, Lisa Watts</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-22T03:31:39.156612-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12029</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12029</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12029</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Letter to the Editor</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">559</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">561</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12033" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events in surgical patients</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12033</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events in surgical patients</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Monica Boer, Jordy J. S. Kiewiet, Eveline B. Boeker, Maya A. Ramrattan, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Loraine Lie-A-Huen, Marja A. Boermeester, </dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-18T02:40:02.140011-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12033</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12033</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12033</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12033-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>This study demonstrates the development, reliability and outcome of a targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events (ADEs) in surgical patients.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12033-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>Initial practice evaluation of this ADE assessment method was carried out in a prospective single centre cohort study. In total, 262 electively admitted surgical patients were included. The surgical trigger tool was applied to patients’ medical records by two independent reviewers, and subsequent assessment of causality, severity and preventability of ADEs was carried out by two independent expert panels consisting of a consultant surgeon and a clinical pharmacologist. The surgical trigger tool and causality assessment method were each tested on reliability in a separate group of 50 randomly selected patients using Fleiss and Cohen's kappa statistics and percentages of agreement. Comparison of this method with an existing trigger tool method for ADEs was performed.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12033-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Our surgical trigger tool contains 51 triggers. The inter- and intra-rater calculations showed substantial to almost perfect levels of agreement (kappa range 0.71–0.83), with a 97.8–98.5% percentage of agreement. Fair to substantial levels of agreement were calculated for causality, severity and preventability (kappa range 0.38–0.79). The percentages of inter- and intra-rater agreement were 68.9 and 70.5% for causality, 67.0 and 82.0% for severity, and both 98.4% for preventability, respectively. Compared with the existing trigger tool method for ADEs, we found an additional 363 triggers, 18 ADEs (an extra 20%) and 3 preventable ADEs in our surgical cohort.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12033-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>This targeted trigger tool for standardized assessment of ADEs in surgical patients shows excellent agreement between reviewers. The assessment of medication-related harm had acceptable agreement. Compared with an existing ADE trigger tool method, the present method found almost 20% extra ADEs. This method can be a useful alternative to existing trigger tool methods, in particular to assess medication safety in surgical patients.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Objectives
This study demonstrates the development, reliability and outcome of a targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events (ADEs) in surgical patients.


Methods
Initial practice evaluation of this ADE assessment method was carried out in a prospective single centre cohort study. In total, 262 electively admitted surgical patients were included. The surgical trigger tool was applied to patients’ medical records by two independent reviewers, and subsequent assessment of causality, severity and preventability of ADEs was carried out by two independent expert panels consisting of a consultant surgeon and a clinical pharmacologist. The surgical trigger tool and causality assessment method were each tested on reliability in a separate group of 50 randomly selected patients using Fleiss and Cohen's kappa statistics and percentages of agreement. Comparison of this method with an existing trigger tool method for ADEs was performed.


Results
Our surgical trigger tool contains 51 triggers. The inter- and intra-rater calculations showed substantial to almost perfect levels of agreement (kappa range 0.71–0.83), with a 97.8–98.5% percentage of agreement. Fair to substantial levels of agreement were calculated for causality, severity and preventability (kappa range 0.38–0.79). The percentages of inter- and intra-rater agreement were 68.9 and 70.5% for causality, 67.0 and 82.0% for severity, and both 98.4% for preventability, respectively. Compared with the existing trigger tool method for ADEs, we found an additional 363 triggers, 18 ADEs (an extra 20%) and 3 preventable ADEs in our surgical cohort.


Conclusions
This targeted trigger tool for standardized assessment of ADEs in surgical patients shows excellent agreement between reviewers. The assessment of medication-related harm had acceptable agreement. Compared with an existing ADE trigger tool method, the present method found almost 20% extra ADEs. This method can be a useful alternative to existing trigger tool methods, in particular to assess medication safety in surgical patients.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12034" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for COPD in ambulatory care: a review</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12034</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for COPD in ambulatory care: a review</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Simoens</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-04-17T05:31:50.295839-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12034</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12034</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12034</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Systematic Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12034-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>This article conducts a literature review about the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in ambulatory care.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12034-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>Relevant economic evaluations were identified by searching Medline (PubMed) and the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database. The search strategy focused on literature reviews and primary economic evaluations. Economic evaluations were included, which compared pharmacotherapy for COPD, chronic bronchitis or pulmonary emphysema with an alternative in terms of costs and health outcomes.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12034-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>The majority of economic evaluations show that pharmacotherapy for COPD in ambulatory care is cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness derives from an improvement in lung function and a reduction in the number of exacerbations, which translates into cost savings from fewer hospitalizations. Pharmacotherapy also tends to be more cost-effective in patients with more severe COPD. When applying these results to a specific country or setting, the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy will depend on the distribution of COPD severity among patients, the alternative with which pharmacotherapy is compared, the impact of pharmacotherapy on exacerbations, costs and treatment patterns of exacerbations, and price of pharmacotherapy. Economic evaluations tended to suffer from short-time horizons, restricted scope of included costs and use of various health outcome measures.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12034-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>There is a case to be made in favour of economic evaluations from the societal perspective that are based on a decision-analytic model to allow for extrapolation beyond the duration of clinical trials and that use generic health outcome measures such as quality-adjusted life years.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
This article conducts a literature review about the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in ambulatory care.


Methods
Relevant economic evaluations were identified by searching Medline (PubMed) and the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database. The search strategy focused on literature reviews and primary economic evaluations. Economic evaluations were included, which compared pharmacotherapy for COPD, chronic bronchitis or pulmonary emphysema with an alternative in terms of costs and health outcomes.


Results
The majority of economic evaluations show that pharmacotherapy for COPD in ambulatory care is cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness derives from an improvement in lung function and a reduction in the number of exacerbations, which translates into cost savings from fewer hospitalizations. Pharmacotherapy also tends to be more cost-effective in patients with more severe COPD. When applying these results to a specific country or setting, the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy will depend on the distribution of COPD severity among patients, the alternative with which pharmacotherapy is compared, the impact of pharmacotherapy on exacerbations, costs and treatment patterns of exacerbations, and price of pharmacotherapy. Economic evaluations tended to suffer from short-time horizons, restricted scope of included costs and use of various health outcome measures.


Conclusions
There is a case to be made in favour of economic evaluations from the societal perspective that are based on a decision-analytic model to allow for extrapolation beyond the duration of clinical trials and that use generic health outcome measures such as quality-adjusted life years.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12027" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Guidelines-based indicators to measure quality of antenatal care</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12027</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guidelines-based indicators to measure quality of antenatal care</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paola Bollini, Katharina Quack-Lötscher</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-26T02:32:08.846757-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12027</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12027</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12027</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12027-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>No comprehensive measurement of quality of antenatal care is available. Late booking or low number of checks are often used as surrogate for poor quality, leaving uncertainty on the actual content of the care received. In order to fill this gap, we have reviewed two sets of clinical guidelines and developed corresponding indicators of quality.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12027-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>A group of clinicians and methodologists reviewed the National Institute for Clinical Excellency Clinical Guidelines on antenatal care, and the list of prenatal care interventions recommended by the Research and Development Group, both based on evidence of effectiveness of specific interventions. We identified single aspects in three domains: (1) services utilization; (2) screening; and (3) interventions. For each indicator, we defined: (1) eligibility, that is the characteristics of the women to whom the indicator applies; (2) standard, that is the situation when the target is met; and (3) moderators, that is all conditions which legitimately hamper the fulfilment of the standard.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12027-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>We developed four indicators of service utilization, 25 of screening and 17 of intervention. The respective eligibility, standard and moderators criteria were described for each indicator. While many indicators could be retrospectively evaluated from medical charts, quality of communication with provider, screening for sensible issues and counselling on behaviours to be avoided could only be obtained with a prospective data collection.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12027-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The indicators of quality of antenatal care, complemented by measures of social position, social support and immigrant/ethnic status, allow for a careful description of the gaps in quality of care for specific groups of women.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
No comprehensive measurement of quality of antenatal care is available. Late booking or low number of checks are often used as surrogate for poor quality, leaving uncertainty on the actual content of the care received. In order to fill this gap, we have reviewed two sets of clinical guidelines and developed corresponding indicators of quality.


Method
A group of clinicians and methodologists reviewed the National Institute for Clinical Excellency Clinical Guidelines on antenatal care, and the list of prenatal care interventions recommended by the Research and Development Group, both based on evidence of effectiveness of specific interventions. We identified single aspects in three domains: (1) services utilization; (2) screening; and (3) interventions. For each indicator, we defined: (1) eligibility, that is the characteristics of the women to whom the indicator applies; (2) standard, that is the situation when the target is met; and (3) moderators, that is all conditions which legitimately hamper the fulfilment of the standard.


Results
We developed four indicators of service utilization, 25 of screening and 17 of intervention. The respective eligibility, standard and moderators criteria were described for each indicator. While many indicators could be retrospectively evaluated from medical charts, quality of communication with provider, screening for sensible issues and counselling on behaviours to be avoided could only be obtained with a prospective data collection.


Conclusions
The indicators of quality of antenatal care, complemented by measures of social position, social support and immigrant/ethnic status, allow for a careful description of the gaps in quality of care for specific groups of women.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12026" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using small-area variations to inform health care service planning: what do we ‘need’ to know?</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12026</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using small-area variations to inform health care service planning: what do we ‘need’ to know?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Mercuri, Stephen Birch, Amiram Gafni</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-22T06:08:48.955151-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12026</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12026</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12026</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12026-sec-9001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Allocating resources on the basis of population need is a health care policy goal in many countries. Thus, resources must be allocated in accordance with need if stakeholders are to achieve policy goals. Small area methods have been presented as a means for revealing important information that can assist stakeholders in meeting policy goals. The purpose of this review is to examine the extent to which small area methods provide information relevant to meeting the goals of a needs-based health care policy.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12026-sec-9002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>We present a conceptual framework explaining the terms ‘demand’, ‘need’, ‘use’ and ‘supply’, as commonly used in the literature. We critically review the literature on small area methods through the lens of this framework.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12026-sec-9003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>‘Use’ cannot be used as a proxy or surrogate of ‘need’. Thus, if the goal of health care policy is to provide equal access for equal need, then traditional small area methods are inadequate because they measure small area variations in use of services in different populations, independent of the levels of need in those populations.</p></div></div> <div class="section" id="jep12026-sec-9004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Small area methods can be modified by incorporating direct measures of relative population need from population health surveys or by adjusting population size for levels of health risks in populations such as the prevalence of smoking and low birth weight. This might improve what can be learned from studies employing small area methods if they are to inform needs-based health care policies.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Allocating resources on the basis of population need is a health care policy goal in many countries. Thus, resources must be allocated in accordance with need if stakeholders are to achieve policy goals. Small area methods have been presented as a means for revealing important information that can assist stakeholders in meeting policy goals. The purpose of this review is to examine the extent to which small area methods provide information relevant to meeting the goals of a needs-based health care policy.


Methods
We present a conceptual framework explaining the terms ‘demand’, ‘need’, ‘use’ and ‘supply’, as commonly used in the literature. We critically review the literature on small area methods through the lens of this framework.


Results
‘Use’ cannot be used as a proxy or surrogate of ‘need’. Thus, if the goal of health care policy is to provide equal access for equal need, then traditional small area methods are inadequate because they measure small area variations in use of services in different populations, independent of the levels of need in those populations.
 
Conclusions
Small area methods can be modified by incorporating direct measures of relative population need from population health surveys or by adjusting population size for levels of health risks in populations such as the prevalence of smoking and low birth weight. This might improve what can be learned from studies employing small area methods if they are to inform needs-based health care policies.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12028" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of family presence on the content and dynamics of the clinical encounter among diabetic patients</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12028</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of family presence on the content and dynamics of the clinical encounter among diabetic patients</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Katerndahl, Michael Parchman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-20T02:49:27.644322-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12028</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12028</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12028</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12028-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Primary care visits often include a family member or friend. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the presence of a family member on the visit content and dynamics among diabetic patients in Family Medicine settings.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12028-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>Encounters of patients with type 2 diabetes from 20 primary care clinics were audio-recorded and transcribed. Encounters were coded using the Davis Observation Codes, classifying content into 20 different categories at 15-second intervals. A random sample of 30 patients with family members was selected; 30 encounters in which no family was present were then matched to the randomly selected patients so that they would be similar group-wise in A1C level, length of visit, level of distress and discussion of non-patient family problems for analysis using orbital decomposition, an analytic technique based on symbolic dynamics in which categorical time series data are used to identify amount of complexity present and recurrent patterns of strings.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12028-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Visits were more linear if family members were present. When family members were present, 90-second strings of preventive services and evaluation/feedback were observed while 90 seconds of exercise discussion occurred when they were absent. Visits without family members tended to include more chatting, compliance discussion and nutrition counselling, while those with family members included more patient questions and evaluation/feedback. Finally, the sequence of history-to-planning-to-evaluation was observed when family were absent, but evaluation-to-planning-to-history when family were present.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12028-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>The presence of a family member was associated with increased linearity and recurrent patterns that focused more on evaluation/feedback, preventive services, and patient questions, and less on chatting, exercise, compliance and nutrition in diabetic encounters.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Primary care visits often include a family member or friend. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the presence of a family member on the visit content and dynamics among diabetic patients in Family Medicine settings.


Method
Encounters of patients with type 2 diabetes from 20 primary care clinics were audio-recorded and transcribed. Encounters were coded using the Davis Observation Codes, classifying content into 20 different categories at 15-second intervals. A random sample of 30 patients with family members was selected; 30 encounters in which no family was present were then matched to the randomly selected patients so that they would be similar group-wise in A1C level, length of visit, level of distress and discussion of non-patient family problems for analysis using orbital decomposition, an analytic technique based on symbolic dynamics in which categorical time series data are used to identify amount of complexity present and recurrent patterns of strings.


Results
Visits were more linear if family members were present. When family members were present, 90-second strings of preventive services and evaluation/feedback were observed while 90 seconds of exercise discussion occurred when they were absent. Visits without family members tended to include more chatting, compliance discussion and nutrition counselling, while those with family members included more patient questions and evaluation/feedback. Finally, the sequence of history-to-planning-to-evaluation was observed when family were absent, but evaluation-to-planning-to-history when family were present.


Conclusion
The presence of a family member was associated with increased linearity and recurrent patterns that focused more on evaluation/feedback, preventive services, and patient questions, and less on chatting, exercise, compliance and nutrition in diabetic encounters.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12025" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Guideline-based development and practice test of quality indicators for physiotherapy care in patients with neck pain</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12025</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guideline-based development and practice test of quality indicators for physiotherapy care in patients with neck pain</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob AB Oostendorp, Geert M Rutten, Jan Dommerholt, Maria W Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Janneke Harting</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-19T06:15:52.932843-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12025</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12025</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12025</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12025-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Little is currently known about the quality of physiotherapy care for patients with musculoskeletal pain. Neck pain was used as an example. The aim is to develop a set of quality indicators, including a practice test.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12025-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A systematic method is used to develop potential process and outcome indicators. An expert and user panel is used to appraise the potential quality indicators regarding clarity, relevancy, feasibility, acceptability and improvement potential. An invitation to participate in the practice test was sent to physiotherapy practices. The resulting algorithm is used to calculate the degree to which physiotherapists met these indicators (0–100%). Differences in valid outcomes are tested for significance (Student's <em>t</em>-test; α = 0.05) and compared with established values for clinical relevance [minimal clinically important change (MCIC)].</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12025-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>A representative set of 40 quality indicators (28 process indicators and 12 outcome indicators) is selected from 44 initial guidelines and literature-based recommendations. The process indicators (<em>n</em> = 28) are classified per step of the clinical reasoning process of physiotherapy care. Of the 106 potential participants from 27 practices, 38 physiotherapists (35.8%) submitted data on 96 patients with non-specific neck pain. On average, the participating physiotherapists showed a 55.6% adherence to process indicators with a great variation in scores per step of the clinical reasoning process. The outcomes for ‘pain’, ‘headache’ and ‘daily functioning’ were significantly better compared with baseline, and the mean differences exceeded established values for MCICs.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12025-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>Guardedly, we can conclude that a systematic approach is a valuable means to develop a preliminary set of process and outcome indicators for physiotherapy care for patients with non-specific neck pain, and a practice test should be an intrinsic part of such a systematic approach as it provides valuable information on the key attributes of the set indicators.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Little is currently known about the quality of physiotherapy care for patients with musculoskeletal pain. Neck pain was used as an example. The aim is to develop a set of quality indicators, including a practice test.


Methods
A systematic method is used to develop potential process and outcome indicators. An expert and user panel is used to appraise the potential quality indicators regarding clarity, relevancy, feasibility, acceptability and improvement potential. An invitation to participate in the practice test was sent to physiotherapy practices. The resulting algorithm is used to calculate the degree to which physiotherapists met these indicators (0–100%). Differences in valid outcomes are tested for significance (Student's t-test; α = 0.05) and compared with established values for clinical relevance [minimal clinically important change (MCIC)].


Results
A representative set of 40 quality indicators (28 process indicators and 12 outcome indicators) is selected from 44 initial guidelines and literature-based recommendations. The process indicators (n = 28) are classified per step of the clinical reasoning process of physiotherapy care. Of the 106 potential participants from 27 practices, 38 physiotherapists (35.8%) submitted data on 96 patients with non-specific neck pain. On average, the participating physiotherapists showed a 55.6% adherence to process indicators with a great variation in scores per step of the clinical reasoning process. The outcomes for ‘pain’, ‘headache’ and ‘daily functioning’ were significantly better compared with baseline, and the mean differences exceeded established values for MCICs.


Conclusion
Guardedly, we can conclude that a systematic approach is a valuable means to develop a preliminary set of process and outcome indicators for physiotherapy care for patients with non-specific neck pain, and a practice test should be an intrinsic part of such a systematic approach as it provides valuable information on the key attributes of the set indicators.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12024" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12024</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aurélie Boudard, Nicolas Martelli, Patrice Prognon, Judith Pineau</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-19T06:15:46.994102-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12024</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12024</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12024</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12024-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationaleaims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Like health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, hospitals are faced with requests for innovative and costly medical devices. However, local decision makers are frequently confronted with a lack of high-quality clinical data when assessing the effectiveness of innovative medical devices. The aim of this study was to quantify the level of evidence available for innovative medical devices in the context of hospital-based HTA.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12024-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>We searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for articles, letters and reports relating to 32 innovative medical devices requested at our hospital between January 2008 and March 2012. All clinical studies retrieved were screened and classified according to the Sackett 5-point level-of-evidence scale.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12024-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>We screened and classified 217 studies: 215 clinical trials and 2 cost-effectiveness studies. Only 47 of the 215 clinical studies (22%) provided high-level clinical evidence (levels 1–2); 33 (15%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). More than half of the 215 studies (52.1%) included fewer than 30 patients. Only 14 of the 47 high-quality studies reported the amount of missing data. For implantable medical devices, 84 (71.8%) studies specified the follow-up period and the mean follow-up period was 18.9 months. Finally, methodological quality did not increase with the risk level of the medical device.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12024-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Our findings confirm that only a few studies of innovative medical devices provide high-level clinical evidence. Nevertheless, RCT may be the ‘gold standard’ for drugs, but it is not always appropriate for medical devices. Changes to the European regulation of medical devices, with the requirement for a demonstration of clinical efficacy and safety before release onto the European market, have raised expectations.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationaleaims and objectives
Like health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, hospitals are faced with requests for innovative and costly medical devices. However, local decision makers are frequently confronted with a lack of high-quality clinical data when assessing the effectiveness of innovative medical devices. The aim of this study was to quantify the level of evidence available for innovative medical devices in the context of hospital-based HTA.


Methods
We searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for articles, letters and reports relating to 32 innovative medical devices requested at our hospital between January 2008 and March 2012. All clinical studies retrieved were screened and classified according to the Sackett 5-point level-of-evidence scale.


Results
We screened and classified 217 studies: 215 clinical trials and 2 cost-effectiveness studies. Only 47 of the 215 clinical studies (22%) provided high-level clinical evidence (levels 1–2); 33 (15%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). More than half of the 215 studies (52.1%) included fewer than 30 patients. Only 14 of the 47 high-quality studies reported the amount of missing data. For implantable medical devices, 84 (71.8%) studies specified the follow-up period and the mean follow-up period was 18.9 months. Finally, methodological quality did not increase with the risk level of the medical device.


Conclusions
Our findings confirm that only a few studies of innovative medical devices provide high-level clinical evidence. Nevertheless, RCT may be the ‘gold standard’ for drugs, but it is not always appropriate for medical devices. Changes to the European regulation of medical devices, with the requirement for a demonstration of clinical efficacy and safety before release onto the European market, have raised expectations.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12023" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Systematic review of the quality of clinical guidelines for aphasia in stroke management</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12023</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Systematic review of the quality of clinical guidelines for aphasia in stroke management</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexia Rohde, Linda Worrall, Guylaine Le Dorze</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-01T01:46:45.4129-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12023</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12023</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12023</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Systematic Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12023-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationaleaims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Aphasia affects up to 38% of stroke survivors. Clinical guidelines can improve patient care and outcomes. Given the importance of aphasia management in stroke care, the purpose of this study was to systematically search for, retrieve and assess the quality of currently published clinical guidelines for aphasia in stroke management.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12023-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>Systematic search of bibliographic resources, publications, association websites, databases, Internet and pearling revealed multidisciplinary stroke and speech pathology-specific clinical guidelines, which were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. Guidelines obtaining a rigour of development score above 66.67% in AGREE II evaluations underwent further ADAPTE Collaboration tool analysis.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12023-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>There was significant variability in methodological rigour, reporting of guideline development processes and scope of coverage of recommendations pertaining to aphasia management provided within the guidelines. The Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2010) and New Zealand Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2010) achieved the highest scores (74% and 81%, respectively) in AGREE II analysis and both obtained a ‘yes’ in all seven ADAPTE domains. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network 108 (2008) guideline achieved 73% in AGREE II and six out of seven ‘yes’ in ADAPTE, however, contained no aphasia-specific recommendations. The Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (2005) guideline provided the most comprehensive aphasia coverage, however, demonstrated lower methodological rigour in AGREE II (64%) and ADAPTE evaluations (three ‘yes’ out of seven).</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12023-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>Improvement is needed in the quality of methodological rigour in development and reporting within clinical guidelines, and in aphasia-specific recommendations within stroke multidisciplinary clinical guidelines.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationaleaims and objectives
Aphasia affects up to 38% of stroke survivors. Clinical guidelines can improve patient care and outcomes. Given the importance of aphasia management in stroke care, the purpose of this study was to systematically search for, retrieve and assess the quality of currently published clinical guidelines for aphasia in stroke management.


Method
Systematic search of bibliographic resources, publications, association websites, databases, Internet and pearling revealed multidisciplinary stroke and speech pathology-specific clinical guidelines, which were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. Guidelines obtaining a rigour of development score above 66.67% in AGREE II evaluations underwent further ADAPTE Collaboration tool analysis.


Results
There was significant variability in methodological rigour, reporting of guideline development processes and scope of coverage of recommendations pertaining to aphasia management provided within the guidelines. The Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2010) and New Zealand Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2010) achieved the highest scores (74% and 81%, respectively) in AGREE II analysis and both obtained a ‘yes’ in all seven ADAPTE domains. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network 108 (2008) guideline achieved 73% in AGREE II and six out of seven ‘yes’ in ADAPTE, however, contained no aphasia-specific recommendations. The Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (2005) guideline provided the most comprehensive aphasia coverage, however, demonstrated lower methodological rigour in AGREE II (64%) and ADAPTE evaluations (three ‘yes’ out of seven).


Conclusion
Improvement is needed in the quality of methodological rigour in development and reporting within clinical guidelines, and in aphasia-specific recommendations within stroke multidisciplinary clinical guidelines.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12022" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: evaluation of quality criteria</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12022</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: evaluation of quality criteria</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nelleke Ottevanger, Mirrian Hilbink, Mariska Weenk, Romy Janssen, Talitha Vrijmoeth, Antoinette Vries, Rosella Hermens</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-26T08:54:03.638449-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12022</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12022</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12022</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12022-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>To develop a guideline with quality criteria for an optimal structure and functioning of a multidisciplinary team meeting (MTM), and to assess to what extent the Dutch MTMs complied with these criteria.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12022-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>A literature search and expert opinions were used to develop a guideline for optimal MTMs. In order to assess adherence to the guideline, we conducted interviews with MTM chairs and observed general and tumour-specific MTMs in seven hospitals.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12022-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>The new guideline included the following domains: (i) organization of the MTMs; (ii) membership of the MTM and roles and responsibilities of the members; (iii) the meeting itself; and (iv) documentation of meeting-recommendations. We observed good adherence to the quality criteria on the organization of the MTMs. Only the required coordinator/administrative support was often absent, particularly during general MTMs. Regarding membership of MTMs and roles, the recommended average attendance of 100% of the core disciplines was never reached and particularly the role of the chair needs improvement. Regarding the meeting itself, many interruptions took place and relevant information about the diagnoses of the cases was not available in 4–5% of the cases. Concerning the documentation of meeting-recommendations, only in a quarter of the meetings a specific form was used for the documentation.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12022-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>We found a lot of diversity in the organization of MTMs. The variation in compliance with the quality criteria may decrease with better knowledge about the quality criteria around MTMs and by overcoming practical barriers for the effective organization of MTMs.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
To develop a guideline with quality criteria for an optimal structure and functioning of a multidisciplinary team meeting (MTM), and to assess to what extent the Dutch MTMs complied with these criteria.


Method
A literature search and expert opinions were used to develop a guideline for optimal MTMs. In order to assess adherence to the guideline, we conducted interviews with MTM chairs and observed general and tumour-specific MTMs in seven hospitals.


Results
The new guideline included the following domains: (i) organization of the MTMs; (ii) membership of the MTM and roles and responsibilities of the members; (iii) the meeting itself; and (iv) documentation of meeting-recommendations. We observed good adherence to the quality criteria on the organization of the MTMs. Only the required coordinator/administrative support was often absent, particularly during general MTMs. Regarding membership of MTMs and roles, the recommended average attendance of 100% of the core disciplines was never reached and particularly the role of the chair needs improvement. Regarding the meeting itself, many interruptions took place and relevant information about the diagnoses of the cases was not available in 4–5% of the cases. Concerning the documentation of meeting-recommendations, only in a quarter of the meetings a specific form was used for the documentation.


Conclusions
We found a lot of diversity in the organization of MTMs. The variation in compliance with the quality criteria may decrease with better knowledge about the quality criteria around MTMs and by overcoming practical barriers for the effective organization of MTMs.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12018" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Patientsmate: potentially a useful tool for documenting clinical performance</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12018</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patientsmate: potentially a useful tool for documenting clinical performance</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire M. Buckley, Caoimhe Casey, Colin P. Bradley</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-02-06T22:02:10.161408-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12018</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12018</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12018</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Letter to the Editor</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12021" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Rationality and the generalization of randomized controlled trial evidence</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12021</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rationality and the generalization of randomized controlled trial evidence</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Fuller</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-01-31T22:32:42.704292-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12021</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12021</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12021</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Commentary</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12020" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A pragmatic strategy for the review of clinical evidence</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12020</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A pragmatic strategy for the review of clinical evidence</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luciano Sagliocca, Salvatore De Masi, Luigina Ferrigno, Alfonso Mele, Giuseppe Traversa</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-01-15T01:45:26.312988-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12020</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12020</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12020</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12020-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p>Systematic reviews (SR) of clinical evidence are rightfully considered the basis for developing recommendations to support decisions in current practice. To avoid bias, SRs are expected to be systematic in their research strategy and are exhaustive. The drawback of the latter criteria relies in the substantial work needed to conduct and keep SRs updated. The objective of this paper is to compare a research strategy based on the review of a selected number of core journals, which we consider a ‘pragmatic review’ (PR), with that derived by an SR in estimating the efficacy of treatments.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12020-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>Five clinical areas were considered for the comparison between the two strategies: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dermatology, heart failure, renal diseases and stroke. We extracted a systematic sample from all the Cochrane SRs pertaining to each area and were published before April 2010. Two groups of journals were considered in the PR: six general journals that commonly published research for the five clinical areas, and five specialist journals with the highest impact factor in each area. To assess the agreement in the findings of SRs and PRs, we considered both the direction of the estimates and <em>P</em>-values.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12020-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>A sample of 27 SRs included 171 overall analyses and 259 subgroup analyses related to primary outcomes. The PR captured one or more clinical trials in 24 of the 27 SRs (89%), and 118 of the 171 overall analyses (69%) were replicated. The PR supported the recommendations to use (or not) the study treatment in 11 of the 13 SRs (85%), which ended with a clinical recommendation.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12020-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>We verified in a sample of SRs that the conclusion of a research strategy based on a pre-defined set of general and specialist medical journals is able to replicate almost all the clinical recommendations of a formal SR.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Background
Systematic reviews (SR) of clinical evidence are rightfully considered the basis for developing recommendations to support decisions in current practice. To avoid bias, SRs are expected to be systematic in their research strategy and are exhaustive. The drawback of the latter criteria relies in the substantial work needed to conduct and keep SRs updated. The objective of this paper is to compare a research strategy based on the review of a selected number of core journals, which we consider a ‘pragmatic review’ (PR), with that derived by an SR in estimating the efficacy of treatments.


Methods
Five clinical areas were considered for the comparison between the two strategies: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dermatology, heart failure, renal diseases and stroke. We extracted a systematic sample from all the Cochrane SRs pertaining to each area and were published before April 2010. Two groups of journals were considered in the PR: six general journals that commonly published research for the five clinical areas, and five specialist journals with the highest impact factor in each area. To assess the agreement in the findings of SRs and PRs, we considered both the direction of the estimates and P-values.


Results
A sample of 27 SRs included 171 overall analyses and 259 subgroup analyses related to primary outcomes. The PR captured one or more clinical trials in 24 of the 27 SRs (89%), and 118 of the 171 overall analyses (69%) were replicated. The PR supported the recommendations to use (or not) the study treatment in 11 of the 13 SRs (85%), which ended with a clinical recommendation.


Conclusions
We verified in a sample of SRs that the conclusion of a research strategy based on a pre-defined set of general and specialist medical journals is able to replicate almost all the clinical recommendations of a formal SR.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12019" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Application of an evidence-based decision rule to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12019</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Application of an evidence-based decision rule to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Zwaan, Abel Thijs, Cordula Wagner, Daniëlle R. M. Timmermans</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-12-28T05:35:17.225981-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12019</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12019</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12019</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12019-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale</h4><div class="para"><p>To support doctors in diagnosing patients who are suspected to have pulmonary embolism, the Christopher evidence-based decision rule was implemented in hospitals in the Netherlands. This study examines whether the Christopher evidence-based decision rule is applied in clinical practice. In addition, doctors' considerations for not applying the decision rule are explored.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12019-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>Dyspnoea patients were included in the study prospectively. The diagnostic process of the patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, as judged by the treating doctor, was compared with the Christopher evidence-based decision rule using patient record reviews. In addition, 14 interviews were conducted with doctors who did not follow the Christopher evidence-based decision rule to obtain insights into their considerations.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12019-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>In 80 of 247 dyspnoea cases, the treating doctors suspected pulmonary embolism. The Christopher evidence-based decision rule was applied in 17 out of 80 cases. In 22 cases, more tests were performed than was suggested by the decision rule [i.e. computer-assisted tomographic angiography (CTa) or <span class="smallCaps">d</span>-dimer], while in 41 cases fewer tests were performed than suggested by the decision rule. Considerations for not following the decision rule included judging another diagnosis to be more likely and not wanting to expose the patient to CTa radiation.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12019-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The Christopher evidence-based decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism was not always followed in everyday clinical practice. Doctors seem to base their diagnostic strategy on their own estimate of the likelihood of pulmonary embolism, rather than the whole decision rule. Better adherence to the decision rule could be beneficial by making doctors aware that pulmonary embolism is more likely than they initially thought. However, in a substantial number of cases, it seemed justifiable that doctors deviated from the decision rule. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the value of the Christopher evidence-based decision rule in clinical practice.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale
To support doctors in diagnosing patients who are suspected to have pulmonary embolism, the Christopher evidence-based decision rule was implemented in hospitals in the Netherlands. This study examines whether the Christopher evidence-based decision rule is applied in clinical practice. In addition, doctors' considerations for not applying the decision rule are explored.


Method
Dyspnoea patients were included in the study prospectively. The diagnostic process of the patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, as judged by the treating doctor, was compared with the Christopher evidence-based decision rule using patient record reviews. In addition, 14 interviews were conducted with doctors who did not follow the Christopher evidence-based decision rule to obtain insights into their considerations.


Results
In 80 of 247 dyspnoea cases, the treating doctors suspected pulmonary embolism. The Christopher evidence-based decision rule was applied in 17 out of 80 cases. In 22 cases, more tests were performed than was suggested by the decision rule [i.e. computer-assisted tomographic angiography (CTa) or d-dimer], while in 41 cases fewer tests were performed than suggested by the decision rule. Considerations for not following the decision rule included judging another diagnosis to be more likely and not wanting to expose the patient to CTa radiation.


Conclusions
The Christopher evidence-based decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism was not always followed in everyday clinical practice. Doctors seem to base their diagnostic strategy on their own estimate of the likelihood of pulmonary embolism, rather than the whole decision rule. Better adherence to the decision rule could be beneficial by making doctors aware that pulmonary embolism is more likely than they initially thought. However, in a substantial number of cases, it seemed justifiable that doctors deviated from the decision rule. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the value of the Christopher evidence-based decision rule in clinical practice.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12017" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12017</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pierre Pluye</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-12-28T05:32:25.275663-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12017</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12017</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12017</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Letter to the Editor</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12016" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12016</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Cosgrove, Harold J. Bursztajn, Deborah R. Erlich, Emily E. Wheeler, Allen F. Shaughnessy</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-12-21T01:30:55.036336-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12016</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12016</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12016</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12016-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p>There is increasing concern that conflicts of interest affect the development process of clinical practice guidelines. We evaluated The American Psychiatric Association's Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder to determine the existence of financial and intellectual conflicts of interest and examine their possible effects. We selected this guideline because of its influence on clinical practice and because this guideline recommends pharmacotherapy for all levels of depression, despite controversies over the evidence base.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12016-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods and Findings</h4><div class="para"><p>We determined the number and type of financial conflicts of interest for members of the guideline development group as well as for the independent panel charged with mitigating any effect of these conflicts. We also quantified the potential for intellectual conflicts of interest. We examined the quality of references used to support recommendations, as well as the degree of congruence between the research results and the recommendations. Fewer than half (44.4%) of the studies supporting the recommendations met criteria for high quality. Over one-third (34.2%) of the cited research did not study outpatients with major depressive disorder, and 17.2% did not measure clinically relevant results. One-fifth (19.7%) of the reference were not congruent with the recommendations. Financial ties to industry were disclosed by all members (100%) of the guideline development committee with members reporting a mean 20.5 relationships (range 9–33). The majority of the committee participated on pharmaceutical companies' speakers' bureaus. Members of the independent panel that reviewed the guidelines for bias had undeclared financial relationships. As a marker of intellectual conflict of interest, 9.1% of all cited research and 13% of references supporting the recommendations were co-authored by the six guideline developers.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12016-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The prevalence of conflicts of interest among panel members was high. The quality of the evidence cited raises questions about the validity of the recommendations. Attention to the quality of cited studies and to the risk of bias resulting from conflicts of interest should be a priority for guideline development groups.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Background
There is increasing concern that conflicts of interest affect the development process of clinical practice guidelines. We evaluated The American Psychiatric Association's Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder to determine the existence of financial and intellectual conflicts of interest and examine their possible effects. We selected this guideline because of its influence on clinical practice and because this guideline recommends pharmacotherapy for all levels of depression, despite controversies over the evidence base.


Methods and Findings
We determined the number and type of financial conflicts of interest for members of the guideline development group as well as for the independent panel charged with mitigating any effect of these conflicts. We also quantified the potential for intellectual conflicts of interest. We examined the quality of references used to support recommendations, as well as the degree of congruence between the research results and the recommendations. Fewer than half (44.4%) of the studies supporting the recommendations met criteria for high quality. Over one-third (34.2%) of the cited research did not study outpatients with major depressive disorder, and 17.2% did not measure clinically relevant results. One-fifth (19.7%) of the reference were not congruent with the recommendations. Financial ties to industry were disclosed by all members (100%) of the guideline development committee with members reporting a mean 20.5 relationships (range 9–33). The majority of the committee participated on pharmaceutical companies' speakers' bureaus. Members of the independent panel that reviewed the guidelines for bias had undeclared financial relationships. As a marker of intellectual conflict of interest, 9.1% of all cited research and 13% of references supporting the recommendations were co-authored by the six guideline developers.


Conclusions
The prevalence of conflicts of interest among panel members was high. The quality of the evidence cited raises questions about the validity of the recommendations. Attention to the quality of cited studies and to the risk of bias resulting from conflicts of interest should be a priority for guideline development groups.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12015" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>An additional cause of health care disparities: the variable clinical decisions of primary care doctors</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12015</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">An additional cause of health care disparities: the variable clinical decisions of primary care doctors</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John McKinlay, Rebecca Piccolo, Lisa Marceau</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-12-06T21:30:42.543256-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12015</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12015</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12015</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12015-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationaleaims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Decades of work on health disparities have culminated in identification of three contributors to variability in diagnosis and management of disease: (i) patient attributes; (ii) doctor's characteristics; and (iii) organizational factors. Understanding the relative influence of different contributors to variability in diagnosis and management of diabetes is important to improving quality and reducing disparities. This study was designed to examine the influence of patient, provider and organizational factors on the diagnosis and management of a major chronic disease – diabetes.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12015-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>A factorial experiment using video vignettes was conducted among <em>n</em> = 192 primary care doctors. Doctors were interviewed after viewing vignettes of (1) a ‘patient’ with symptoms strongly suggestive of diabetes and (2) an already diagnosed diabetes ‘patient’ with emerging peripheral neuropathy.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12015-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>A total of 60.9% of doctors identified diabetes as the correct diagnosis, with significant variations depending on the patients’ race/ethnicity. Many doctors offered competing diagnoses with high levels of certainty. For the ‘patient’ with emerging peripheral neuropathy, 42.2% of doctors would do all essential components of a foot examination, while 21.9% would do none.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12015-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>That half of all diabetes in the United States remains undiagnosed is unsurprising given only 60.9% of doctors would diagnose it when the condition is strongly suggested, and nearly one-quarter suspecting diabetes would not order tests necessary to confirm it. The diagnosis of diabetes is significantly influenced by a patient's race/ethnicity, and clinical management (specifically for foot neuropathy) is influenced by patient socio-economic status (SES), doctor's gender and access to clinical guidelines.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationaleaims and objectives
Decades of work on health disparities have culminated in identification of three contributors to variability in diagnosis and management of disease: (i) patient attributes; (ii) doctor's characteristics; and (iii) organizational factors. Understanding the relative influence of different contributors to variability in diagnosis and management of diabetes is important to improving quality and reducing disparities. This study was designed to examine the influence of patient, provider and organizational factors on the diagnosis and management of a major chronic disease – diabetes.


Method
A factorial experiment using video vignettes was conducted among n = 192 primary care doctors. Doctors were interviewed after viewing vignettes of (1) a ‘patient’ with symptoms strongly suggestive of diabetes and (2) an already diagnosed diabetes ‘patient’ with emerging peripheral neuropathy.


Results
A total of 60.9% of doctors identified diabetes as the correct diagnosis, with significant variations depending on the patients’ race/ethnicity. Many doctors offered competing diagnoses with high levels of certainty. For the ‘patient’ with emerging peripheral neuropathy, 42.2% of doctors would do all essential components of a foot examination, while 21.9% would do none.


Conclusions
That half of all diabetes in the United States remains undiagnosed is unsurprising given only 60.9% of doctors would diagnose it when the condition is strongly suggested, and nearly one-quarter suspecting diabetes would not order tests necessary to confirm it. The diagnosis of diabetes is significantly influenced by a patient's race/ethnicity, and clinical management (specifically for foot neuropathy) is influenced by patient socio-economic status (SES), doctor's gender and access to clinical guidelines.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12013" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Reflections on the implementation of governance structures for early-stage clinical innovation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12013</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reflections on the implementation of governance structures for early-stage clinical innovation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke Cowie, Jane Sandall, Kathryn Ehrich</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-11-28T20:10:31.589825-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12013</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12013</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12013</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12013-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>This paper seeks to further explore the question of how best to monitor and govern innovative clinical procedures in their earliest phase of development. We examine the potential value of proposed governance frameworks, such as the IDEAL model, and examine the functioning of a novel procedures review committee.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12013-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>The paper draws upon 20 qualitative, semi-structured interviews. Nine interviews were conducted with members of a committee that was established as a means of governing innovative procedures within a large National Health Service Foundation Trust hospital in the UK. Eleven interviews were conducted with health providers involved with the development of a variety of novel clinical procedures.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12013-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Prominent themes from the data include the potential willingness of clinicians to engage with regulatory frameworks for innovative procedures, existing ways in which clinicians and others attempt to ensure patient's safety and manage uncertainty in the context of novel procedures, views on the potential benefits and drawbacks of engaging with a review committee for novel procedures, and the pragmatic considerations and potential unintended consequences that are entailed in the implementation of regulatory requirements for the monitoring of innovative procedures.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12013-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The views of committee members and clinical innovators help us to understand the practical issues of implementing governance structures for novel clinical procedures. The data illustrate those factors that must be taken into account if governance is to support innovation rather than act as an inhibiting factor in the development of new clinical procedures.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Objectives
This paper seeks to further explore the question of how best to monitor and govern innovative clinical procedures in their earliest phase of development. We examine the potential value of proposed governance frameworks, such as the IDEAL model, and examine the functioning of a novel procedures review committee.


Methods
The paper draws upon 20 qualitative, semi-structured interviews. Nine interviews were conducted with members of a committee that was established as a means of governing innovative procedures within a large National Health Service Foundation Trust hospital in the UK. Eleven interviews were conducted with health providers involved with the development of a variety of novel clinical procedures.


Results
Prominent themes from the data include the potential willingness of clinicians to engage with regulatory frameworks for innovative procedures, existing ways in which clinicians and others attempt to ensure patient's safety and manage uncertainty in the context of novel procedures, views on the potential benefits and drawbacks of engaging with a review committee for novel procedures, and the pragmatic considerations and potential unintended consequences that are entailed in the implementation of regulatory requirements for the monitoring of innovative procedures.


Conclusions
The views of committee members and clinical innovators help us to understand the practical issues of implementing governance structures for novel clinical procedures. The data illustrate those factors that must be taken into account if governance is to support innovation rather than act as an inhibiting factor in the development of new clinical procedures.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12011" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The impact of MRI on stroke management and outcomes: a systematic review</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12011</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The impact of MRI on stroke management and outcomes: a systematic review</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James F Burke, Douglas J Gelb, Douglas J Quint, Lewis B Morgenstern, Kevin A Kerber</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-11-22T21:12:25.240853-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12011</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12011</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12011</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Systematic Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12011-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in stroke evaluation and is superior to computed tomography for the detection of acute ischaemia. We sought to evaluate the evidence that conventional MRI influences doctor management or patient outcomes in routine care.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12011-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>We systematically searched PubMED, EMBASE and proceedings of the International Stroke Conference. Studies were included if they included patients presenting with possible stroke syndromes and they reported MRI results and resulting changes in management or outcome. Multiple reviewers determined inclusion/exclusion for each study, abstracted study characteristics and assessed study quality.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12011-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Of 1813 articles screened, nine studies met inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies or case-control studies. We found little evidence that MRI affects outcomes – one single-centre case series presented three patients. The remaining articles were studies of diagnostic tests or vignette-based studies that described changes in doctor management attributed to MRI.</p></div><div class="para"><p>In the studies that suggested MRI influenced management, it did so in two ways. First, MRI distinguished stroke from mimics (e.g. brain tumours), thus enabling more appropriate selection of therapies. Second, even when MRI confirmed a suspected stroke diagnosis, it sometimes provided information (on stroke mechanism, localization, timing or pathophysiology) that influenced management.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12011-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The impact of MRI on management and outcomes in stroke patients has been inadequately studied. Further research is needed to understand how MRI may productively affect stroke management and outcomes.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in stroke evaluation and is superior to computed tomography for the detection of acute ischaemia. We sought to evaluate the evidence that conventional MRI influences doctor management or patient outcomes in routine care.


Methods
We systematically searched PubMED, EMBASE and proceedings of the International Stroke Conference. Studies were included if they included patients presenting with possible stroke syndromes and they reported MRI results and resulting changes in management or outcome. Multiple reviewers determined inclusion/exclusion for each study, abstracted study characteristics and assessed study quality.


Results
Of 1813 articles screened, nine studies met inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies or case-control studies. We found little evidence that MRI affects outcomes – one single-centre case series presented three patients. The remaining articles were studies of diagnostic tests or vignette-based studies that described changes in doctor management attributed to MRI.
In the studies that suggested MRI influenced management, it did so in two ways. First, MRI distinguished stroke from mimics (e.g. brain tumours), thus enabling more appropriate selection of therapies. Second, even when MRI confirmed a suspected stroke diagnosis, it sometimes provided information (on stroke mechanism, localization, timing or pathophysiology) that influenced management.


Conclusions
The impact of MRI on management and outcomes in stroke patients has been inadequately studied. Further research is needed to understand how MRI may productively affect stroke management and outcomes.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12012" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Predicting post-discharge death or readmission: deterioration of model performance in population having multiple admissions per patient</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12012</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Predicting post-discharge death or readmission: deterioration of model performance in population having multiple admissions per patient</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carl Walraven, Jenna Wong, Alan J. Forster, Stephen Hawken</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-11-19T21:14:04.749116-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12012</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12012</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12012</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12012-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p>To avoid biased estimates of standard errors in regression models, statisticians commonly limit the analytical dataset to one observation per patient.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12012-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objective</h4><div class="para"><p>Measure and explain changes in model performance when a model predicting 30-day risk of death or urgent readmission (derived on a dataset having one hospitalization per patient) was applied to all hospitalizations for study patients.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12012-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>Using administrative data from Ontario, we identified all hospitalizations of 499 996 patients between 2004 and 2009. We calculated the expected risk for 30-day death or urgent readmission using a validated model. The observed-to-expected ratio was determined after categorizing patients into quintiles of rates for hospitalization, emergent hospitalizations, hospital day and total diagnostic risk score.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12012-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Study patients had a total of 858 410 hospitalizations. Compared with a dataset having one hospitalization per patient, model performance declined significantly when applied to all hospitalizations [c-statistic decreased from 0.768 to 0.730; the observed-to-expected ratio increased from 0.998 (95% confidence interval 0.977–0.999) to 1.305 (1.297–1.313)]. Model deterioration was most pronounced in patients with higher hospital utilization, with the observed-to-expected ratio increasing to 1.67 in the highest quintile of emergent hospitalization rates.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12012-sec-0005" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The accuracy of predicting 30-day death or urgent readmission decreased significantly when the unit of analysis changed from the patient to the hospitalization. Patients with heavy hospital utilization likely have characteristics, not adequately captured in the model, that increase the risk of death or urgent readmission after discharge from hospital. Adequately capturing the characteristics of such high-end hospital users may improve readmission models.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Background
To avoid biased estimates of standard errors in regression models, statisticians commonly limit the analytical dataset to one observation per patient.


Objective
Measure and explain changes in model performance when a model predicting 30-day risk of death or urgent readmission (derived on a dataset having one hospitalization per patient) was applied to all hospitalizations for study patients.


Methods
Using administrative data from Ontario, we identified all hospitalizations of 499 996 patients between 2004 and 2009. We calculated the expected risk for 30-day death or urgent readmission using a validated model. The observed-to-expected ratio was determined after categorizing patients into quintiles of rates for hospitalization, emergent hospitalizations, hospital day and total diagnostic risk score.


Results
Study patients had a total of 858 410 hospitalizations. Compared with a dataset having one hospitalization per patient, model performance declined significantly when applied to all hospitalizations [c-statistic decreased from 0.768 to 0.730; the observed-to-expected ratio increased from 0.998 (95% confidence interval 0.977–0.999) to 1.305 (1.297–1.313)]. Model deterioration was most pronounced in patients with higher hospital utilization, with the observed-to-expected ratio increasing to 1.67 in the highest quintile of emergent hospitalization rates.


Conclusions
The accuracy of predicting 30-day death or urgent readmission decreased significantly when the unit of analysis changed from the patient to the hospitalization. Patients with heavy hospital utilization likely have characteristics, not adequately captured in the model, that increase the risk of death or urgent readmission after discharge from hospital. Adequately capturing the characteristics of such high-end hospital users may improve readmission models.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12014" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Cardiovascular disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescribing in the midst of evolving guidelines</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12014</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cardiovascular disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescribing in the midst of evolving guidelines</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Timothy T. Pham, Michael J. Miller, Donald L. Harrison, Ann E. Lloyd, Kimberly M. Crosby, Jeremy L. Johnson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-11-19T21:12:43.490185-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12014</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12014</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12014</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep12014-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Responding to safety concerns, the American Heart Association (AHA) published guidelines for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) during 2005 and revised them in 2007. In the revision, a stepped approach to pain management recommended non-selective NSAIDs over highly selective NSAIDs. This research evaluated NSAID prescribing during and after guideline dissemination.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12014-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>A cross-sectional sample of 8666 adult, community-based practice visits with one NSAID prescription representing approximately 305 million visits from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2005 to 2010 was studied. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient, provider and visit characteristics assessed the associations between diagnosis of CVD and NSAID type prescribed during each calendar year. Visits were stratified by arthritis diagnosis to model short-term/intermittent and long-term NSAID use.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12014-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Approximately one-third (36.8%) of visits involving a NSAID prescription included at least one of four diagnoses for CVD (i.e. hypertension, congestive heart failure, ischaemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease). Visits involving a CVD diagnosis had increased odds of a prescription for celecoxib, a highly selective NSAIDs, overall [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–1.57] and in the subgroup of visits without an arthritis diagnosis (AOR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11–1.89). Results were not statistically significant for visits with an arthritis diagnosis (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.47–2.57). When analysed by year, the relationship was statistically significant in 2005 and 2006, but not statistically significant in each subsequent year.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep12014-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>National prescribing trends suggest partial implementation of AHA guidelines for NSAID prescribing in CVD from 2005 to 2010.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Responding to safety concerns, the American Heart Association (AHA) published guidelines for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) during 2005 and revised them in 2007. In the revision, a stepped approach to pain management recommended non-selective NSAIDs over highly selective NSAIDs. This research evaluated NSAID prescribing during and after guideline dissemination.


Method
A cross-sectional sample of 8666 adult, community-based practice visits with one NSAID prescription representing approximately 305 million visits from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2005 to 2010 was studied. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient, provider and visit characteristics assessed the associations between diagnosis of CVD and NSAID type prescribed during each calendar year. Visits were stratified by arthritis diagnosis to model short-term/intermittent and long-term NSAID use.


Results
Approximately one-third (36.8%) of visits involving a NSAID prescription included at least one of four diagnoses for CVD (i.e. hypertension, congestive heart failure, ischaemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease). Visits involving a CVD diagnosis had increased odds of a prescription for celecoxib, a highly selective NSAIDs, overall [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–1.57] and in the subgroup of visits without an arthritis diagnosis (AOR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11–1.89). Results were not statistically significant for visits with an arthritis diagnosis (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.47–2.57). When analysed by year, the relationship was statistically significant in 2005 and 2006, but not statistically significant in each subsequent year.


Conclusion
National prescribing trends suggest partial implementation of AHA guidelines for NSAID prescribing in CVD from 2005 to 2010.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12010" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A new criterion for confounder selection? Neither a confounder nor science</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12010</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A new criterion for confounder selection? Neither a confounder nor science</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eyal Shahar</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-11-08T20:10:30.43324-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12010</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12010</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12010</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Personal View</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01892.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Evaluation of changes in guidelines for medication management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01892.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evaluation of changes in guidelines for medication management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fang-Ju Lin, Todd A. Lee, Pei Shieen Wong, A. Simon Pickard</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-08-14T19:22:28.203524-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01892.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01892.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01892.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1892-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines are well-known international clinical practice guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective of this study was to examine how treatment recommendations and the quality of supporting evidence for pharmacologic management of stable COPD have evolved since the initial guidance issued in 2001.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1892-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>Recommendations in the 2001 and 2011 GOLD guidelines, along with the evidence grades (i.e. A, B, C, D), were identified and abstracted. We determined the distribution and evolution of recommendations across levels of evidence and treatment categories over time.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1892-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>There were 35 and 54 recommendations identified in the 2001 and 2011 guidelines, respectively. Twenty-six recommendations were common to the 2001 and 2011 guidelines, with eight having the same evidence grade in both versions and three having a grade change (one upgraded and two downgraded). Twenty-eight new recommendations were added in 2011. Bronchodilators, glucocorticosteroids, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors are the classes of pharmacologic treatment with the most prominent changes regarding emerging evidence and the number of recommendations. Approximately 45% of the graded recommendations were supported by well-designed randomized controlled trials, i.e. grade A.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1892-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The GOLD guideline recommendations have changed considerably over the past 11 years, which reflects a dynamic evidence base and perhaps a change in the way guideline developers view the evidence to inform recommendations. Given the large number of recommendations with lower grade levels, there continues to be substantial opportunity to inform gaps in the evidence base with high-quality studies.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines are well-known international clinical practice guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective of this study was to examine how treatment recommendations and the quality of supporting evidence for pharmacologic management of stable COPD have evolved since the initial guidance issued in 2001.


Methods
Recommendations in the 2001 and 2011 GOLD guidelines, along with the evidence grades (i.e. A, B, C, D), were identified and abstracted. We determined the distribution and evolution of recommendations across levels of evidence and treatment categories over time.


Results
There were 35 and 54 recommendations identified in the 2001 and 2011 guidelines, respectively. Twenty-six recommendations were common to the 2001 and 2011 guidelines, with eight having the same evidence grade in both versions and three having a grade change (one upgraded and two downgraded). Twenty-eight new recommendations were added in 2011. Bronchodilators, glucocorticosteroids, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors are the classes of pharmacologic treatment with the most prominent changes regarding emerging evidence and the number of recommendations. Approximately 45% of the graded recommendations were supported by well-designed randomized controlled trials, i.e. grade A.


Conclusions
The GOLD guideline recommendations have changed considerably over the past 11 years, which reflects a dynamic evidence base and perhaps a change in the way guideline developers view the evidence to inform recommendations. Given the large number of recommendations with lower grade levels, there continues to be substantial opportunity to inform gaps in the evidence base with high-quality studies.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01888.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01888.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Piet N. Post, Hans Beer, Gordon H. Guyatt</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-08-05T19:16:53.638974-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01888.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01888.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01888.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1888-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the preferred source for evidence for the effect of treatment. However, patients participating in RCTs often manifest important differences from patients seen in practice. Therefore, guideline developers have to decide whether the results are generalizable to the target population not represented in RCTs.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1888-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify methods to decide whether to generalize the results from RCTs to patients who were not represented in these trials.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1888-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>One approach is to examine the in- and exclusion criteria of trials and infer from these whether the trial population was sufficiently representative. Other authors suggest, because of the inclusion of a broader range of patients, reliance on observational studies if no direct evidence for the target population is available.</p></div><div class="para"><p>Another approach is to apply the relative effect of treatment found in trials to patients in practice unless there is a compelling reason to believe the results would differ substantially as a function of particular characteristics of those patients. Although there are exceptions, this approach is supported by empirical evidence that, in general, relative effect of treatment on benefit outcomes seldom differs to an important extent across subgroups of patients.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1888-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>We propose this last approach: focusing on RCTs unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Compelling reasons will most often be found with respect to issues of rare adverse effects, for which observational studies are likely to provide the best estimates.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the preferred source for evidence for the effect of treatment. However, patients participating in RCTs often manifest important differences from patients seen in practice. Therefore, guideline developers have to decide whether the results are generalizable to the target population not represented in RCTs.


Method
A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify methods to decide whether to generalize the results from RCTs to patients who were not represented in these trials.


Results
One approach is to examine the in- and exclusion criteria of trials and infer from these whether the trial population was sufficiently representative. Other authors suggest, because of the inclusion of a broader range of patients, reliance on observational studies if no direct evidence for the target population is available.
Another approach is to apply the relative effect of treatment found in trials to patients in practice unless there is a compelling reason to believe the results would differ substantially as a function of particular characteristics of those patients. Although there are exceptions, this approach is supported by empirical evidence that, in general, relative effect of treatment on benefit outcomes seldom differs to an important extent across subgroups of patients.


Conclusion
We propose this last approach: focusing on RCTs unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Compelling reasons will most often be found with respect to issues of rare adverse effects, for which observational studies are likely to provide the best estimates.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01894.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Use of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Malaysian practice</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01894.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Use of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Malaysian practice</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yaman Walid Kassab, Yahaya Hassan, Noorizan Abd Aziz, Hadeer Akram, Omar Ismail</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:30:24.757396-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01894.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01894.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01894.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1894-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale</h4><div class="para"><p>Despite the availability of various prevention guidelines on acute coronary syndrome (ACS), secondary prevention practice utilizing aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins still can be sub-optimal.</p></div></div> <div class="section" id="jep1894-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>To review and document the utilization of pharmacotherapy for the secondary prevention of ACS in patients discharged from a Malaysian hospital.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1894-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Penang, Malaysia. Patients with a primary diagnosis of ACS were identified from medical records over a 4-month period. A range of clinical data was extracted from medical records, including medical history, clinical presentation and pharmacotherapy both on admission and at discharge. This audit focused on the use of four guideline-recommended therapies: aspirin±clopidogrel, beta-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1894-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Data pertaining to a total of 380 ACS patients was extracted and reviewed, the mean age of the study population was 57.49 years and 73.9% of population was males. Patients with unstable angina accounted for 56.6% of the admissions whereas 23.4% and 20% of the patients were admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation infarct respectively. 95.7% of the patients received antiplatelets comprising of at least aspirin, and 82% received aspirin plus clopidogrel. Furthermore, 80.3% of the patients received a beta-blocker at discharge, 95% a statin and 69.7% received either an ACEI or ARB. Compared with patients who presented with myocardial infarction (with or without ST-segment elevation), those presenting with unstable angina were less likely to receive the combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel or an ACEI/ARB at discharge. Patients over 65 years of age were also less likely to receive a beta-blocker at discharge, compared with younger patients.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1894-sec-0005" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>There is a good adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the secondary prevention of ACS in this local setting. However, there is some potential underutilization in the older population and patients presenting with unstable angina.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale
Despite the availability of various prevention guidelines on acute coronary syndrome (ACS), secondary prevention practice utilizing aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins still can be sub-optimal.
 
Aims and objectives
To review and document the utilization of pharmacotherapy for the secondary prevention of ACS in patients discharged from a Malaysian hospital.


Methods
A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Penang, Malaysia. Patients with a primary diagnosis of ACS were identified from medical records over a 4-month period. A range of clinical data was extracted from medical records, including medical history, clinical presentation and pharmacotherapy both on admission and at discharge. This audit focused on the use of four guideline-recommended therapies: aspirin±clopidogrel, beta-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).


Results
Data pertaining to a total of 380 ACS patients was extracted and reviewed, the mean age of the study population was 57.49 years and 73.9% of population was males. Patients with unstable angina accounted for 56.6% of the admissions whereas 23.4% and 20% of the patients were admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation infarct respectively. 95.7% of the patients received antiplatelets comprising of at least aspirin, and 82% received aspirin plus clopidogrel. Furthermore, 80.3% of the patients received a beta-blocker at discharge, 95% a statin and 69.7% received either an ACEI or ARB. Compared with patients who presented with myocardial infarction (with or without ST-segment elevation), those presenting with unstable angina were less likely to receive the combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel or an ACEI/ARB at discharge. Patients over 65 years of age were also less likely to receive a beta-blocker at discharge, compared with younger patients.


Conclusions
There is a good adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the secondary prevention of ACS in this local setting. However, there is some potential underutilization in the older population and patients presenting with unstable angina.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01890.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01890.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suhail A. R. Doi, Jan J. Barendregt, Adedayo A. Onitilo</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:30:16.976955-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01890.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01890.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01890.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1890-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p>A unique challenge in meta-analysis of observational studies is bias adjustment. Two different approaches have been proposed for doing this – using summary scores versus component scores. The prevailing view on this matter is that summary quality scores are inaccurate because information from its components can cancel each other out.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1890-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A head-to-head comparison of the component score adjustment with our method using summary scores is undertaken, using data reported by the authors of the component method.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1890-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>It is demonstrated that the consideration of components or of aggregate scores does indeed lead to the same conclusions. Yet, the latter does not require imputation of the direction and magnitude of changes to effect sizes.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1890-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The summary quality score used for bias adjustment within the context of an appropriate model may be most expedient. Implications for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of observational studies are discussed.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Background
A unique challenge in meta-analysis of observational studies is bias adjustment. Two different approaches have been proposed for doing this – using summary scores versus component scores. The prevailing view on this matter is that summary quality scores are inaccurate because information from its components can cancel each other out.


Methods
A head-to-head comparison of the component score adjustment with our method using summary scores is undertaken, using data reported by the authors of the component method.


Results
It is demonstrated that the consideration of components or of aggregate scores does indeed lead to the same conclusions. Yet, the latter does not require imputation of the direction and magnitude of changes to effect sizes.


Conclusions
The summary quality score used for bias adjustment within the context of an appropriate model may be most expedient. Implications for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of observational studies are discussed.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01889.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A practical educational tool for teaching child-care hospital professionals attending evidence-based practice courses for continuing medical education to appraise internal validity in systematic reviews</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01889.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A practical educational tool for teaching child-care hospital professionals attending evidence-based practice courses for continuing medical education to appraise internal validity in systematic reviews</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paola Rosati, Franz Porzsolt</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:29:59.435387-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01889.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01889.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01889.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1889-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Having a quick, practical, educational tool designed for busy child-care professionals to check whether systematic reviews (SRs) contain valid information would help them regularly update their evidence-based knowledge and apply it to their patients. Continuing our annual workshop courses encouraging paediatric hospital professionals to use evidence-based information, in a preliminary study, we compared the commonly used Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) questionnaire for appraising overall internal validity in SRs with a new, practical tool designed to check internal validity quickly.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1889-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>During a course in 2010, two ‘teacher-brokers’ taught experienced paediatric hospital professionals to use and compare the CASP and the new practical tool to appraise a Cochrane SR on beclomethasone for asthma in children by assessing internal validity only from the two most weighted randomized controlled trials in the forest plot. At 15 days and 6 months, participants then answered questionnaires designed to assess qualitative data including feelings about working together, memorization and possibly provide feedback for Cochrane reviewers.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1889-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Using the CASP, participants agreed that the Cochrane SR analysed contained overall valid results. Conversely, using the new quick tool, they found poor internal validity. Participants worked well together in a group, took less time to apply the new tool than the CASP (1 vs. 2.5 hours) and provided Cochrane feedback.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1889-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Our quick practical tool for teaching critical appraisal encourages busy child-care hospital professionals to work together, carefully check validity in SRs, apply the findings in clinical practice and provide useful feedback for Cochrane reviewers.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
Having a quick, practical, educational tool designed for busy child-care professionals to check whether systematic reviews (SRs) contain valid information would help them regularly update their evidence-based knowledge and apply it to their patients. Continuing our annual workshop courses encouraging paediatric hospital professionals to use evidence-based information, in a preliminary study, we compared the commonly used Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) questionnaire for appraising overall internal validity in SRs with a new, practical tool designed to check internal validity quickly.


Method
During a course in 2010, two ‘teacher-brokers’ taught experienced paediatric hospital professionals to use and compare the CASP and the new practical tool to appraise a Cochrane SR on beclomethasone for asthma in children by assessing internal validity only from the two most weighted randomized controlled trials in the forest plot. At 15 days and 6 months, participants then answered questionnaires designed to assess qualitative data including feelings about working together, memorization and possibly provide feedback for Cochrane reviewers.


Results
Using the CASP, participants agreed that the Cochrane SR analysed contained overall valid results. Conversely, using the new quick tool, they found poor internal validity. Participants worked well together in a group, took less time to apply the new tool than the CASP (1 vs. 2.5 hours) and provided Cochrane feedback.


Conclusions
Our quick practical tool for teaching critical appraisal encourages busy child-care hospital professionals to work together, carefully check validity in SRs, apply the findings in clinical practice and provide useful feedback for Cochrane reviewers.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01887.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Are health professionals’ perceptions of patient safety related to figures on safety incidents?</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01887.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Are health professionals’ perceptions of patient safety related to figures on safety incidents?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucie Martijn, Mirjam Harmsen, Sander Gaal, Dirk Mettes, Simone Dulmen, Michel Wensing</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:29:54.956006-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01887.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01887.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01887.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1887-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objective</h4><div class="para"><p>The study aims to explore whether health care professionals’ perceptions of patient safety in their practice were associated with the number of patient safety incidents identified in patient records.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1887-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Setting</h4><div class="para"><p>Seventy primary care practices of general practice, general dental practice, midwifery practices and allied health care practices were used in the study.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1887-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A retrospective audit of 50 patient records was performed to identify patient safety incidents in each of the practices and a survey among health professionals to identify their perceptions of patient safety.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1887-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>All health professions felt that ‘communication breakdowns inside the practice’ as well as ‘communication breakdowns outside the practice’ and ‘reporting of patient safety concerns’ were a threat to patient safety in their work setting. We found little association between the perceptions of health professionals and the number of safety incidents. The only item with a significant relation to a higher number of safety incidents referred to the perception of ‘communication problems outside the practice’ as a threat to patient safety.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1887-sec-0005" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>This study indicates that the assessment of professionals’ perceptions may be complementary to observed safety incidents, but not linked to an objective measure of patient safety.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Objective
The study aims to explore whether health care professionals’ perceptions of patient safety in their practice were associated with the number of patient safety incidents identified in patient records.


Setting
Seventy primary care practices of general practice, general dental practice, midwifery practices and allied health care practices were used in the study.


Methods
A retrospective audit of 50 patient records was performed to identify patient safety incidents in each of the practices and a survey among health professionals to identify their perceptions of patient safety.


Results
All health professions felt that ‘communication breakdowns inside the practice’ as well as ‘communication breakdowns outside the practice’ and ‘reporting of patient safety concerns’ were a threat to patient safety in their work setting. We found little association between the perceptions of health professionals and the number of safety incidents. The only item with a significant relation to a higher number of safety incidents referred to the perception of ‘communication problems outside the practice’ as a threat to patient safety.


Conclusions
This study indicates that the assessment of professionals’ perceptions may be complementary to observed safety incidents, but not linked to an objective measure of patient safety.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01848.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Adapting low back pain guidelines within a multidisciplinary context: a process evaluation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01848.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adapting low back pain guidelines within a multidisciplinary context: a process evaluation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christa Harstall, Paul Taenzer, Nancy Zuck, Donna K Angus, Carmen Moga, N. Ann Scott</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:29:39.377749-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01848.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01848.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01848.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> The Alberta Ambassador Program (AAP) adapted seven clinical practice guidelines on low back pain (LBP) into a single guideline spanning the continuum of care from prevention and diagnosis through to treatment. The Ambassador adaptation process was evaluated to</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><ul class="custom"><li><span class="bullet">1</span><div class="text">Identify the major challenges encountered and successful strategies utilized;</div></li><li><span class="bullet">2</span><div class="text">Assess strengths and weaknesses by benchmarking it with the ADAPTE framework; and</div></li><li><span class="bullet">3</span><div class="text">Identify opportunities for improvement.</div></li></ul></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> External consultants reviewed the Ambassador and ADAPTE materials and conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 29 participants from the AAP committees. All participants were asked about the major challenges encountered and potential areas for improvement.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The response rate was 83% (29/35). There was strong consensus that the Ambassador guideline adaptation process was sound and rigorous all respondents indicated willingness to participate in further iterations of the Program. Key elements of success were identified. The main steps and sequence of the process were closely aligned with the ADAPTE framework, although the AAP incorporated additional enhancements which augmented the process. The main divergences between the two frameworks centred on the organizational structure and the methods used to overcome methodological difficulties.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The AAP successfully utilized existing stakeholder interest to create an overarching guideline for managing LBP across multiple primary care disciplines. The study highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the Program, and identified practical strategies for improvement. Evaluating guideline adaptation processes is pivotal to ensuring that they continue to be an efficient, rigorous and practicable option for producing contextualized, clinically relevant guidelines.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  The Alberta Ambassador Program (AAP) adapted seven clinical practice guidelines on low back pain (LBP) into a single guideline spanning the continuum of care from prevention and diagnosis through to treatment. The Ambassador adaptation process was evaluated to1Identify the major challenges encountered and successful strategies utilized;2Assess strengths and weaknesses by benchmarking it with the ADAPTE framework; and3Identify opportunities for improvement.Method  External consultants reviewed the Ambassador and ADAPTE materials and conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 29 participants from the AAP committees. All participants were asked about the major challenges encountered and potential areas for improvement.Results  The response rate was 83% (29/35). There was strong consensus that the Ambassador guideline adaptation process was sound and rigorous all respondents indicated willingness to participate in further iterations of the Program. Key elements of success were identified. The main steps and sequence of the process were closely aligned with the ADAPTE framework, although the AAP incorporated additional enhancements which augmented the process. The main divergences between the two frameworks centred on the organizational structure and the methods used to overcome methodological difficulties.Conclusion  The AAP successfully utilized existing stakeholder interest to create an overarching guideline for managing LBP across multiple primary care disciplines. The study highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the Program, and identified practical strategies for improvement. Evaluating guideline adaptation processes is pivotal to ensuring that they continue to be an efficient, rigorous and practicable option for producing contextualized, clinically relevant guidelines.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01893.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01893.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jing Hu, Ru Chen, Shanshan Wu, Jinling Tang, Gillian Leng, Ilkka Kunnamo, Zhirong Yang, Weiwei Wang, Xinyang Hua, Yuelun Zhang, Yanming Xie, Siyan Zhan</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:25:35.11591-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01893.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01893.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01893.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1893-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p>Clinical guidelines are an important tool for improving service quality, the benefits of guidelines depend on their quality. In China, there has been a great increase in production of guidelines. However, little is known about their quality.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1893-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>We identified Chinese guidelines published between 2006 and 2010 by searching three Chinese full-text databases, major Chinese guidelines websites and Google. Three appraisers independently evaluated each guideline by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Subgroup analyses were performed according to source, title, version, aspect of care and developer of guidelines.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1893-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>A total of 327 guidelines were eligible and 57 were excluded for their lacking of any account of the guideline development methodology. Of the 270 guidelines, 77 (28.5%) can be recommended, 6 (2.2%) were evidence-based guidelines. Sixteen (5.9%) guidelines described the methods used to search for evidence, 61 (22.6%) appraised the quality of evidence and 53 (19.6%) graded the strength of recommendations. Two guidelines declared the involvement of methodological experts and none reported considering patients’ values. 29 (10.7%) guidelines received drug company sponsorship but only two declared the views of the funding bodies did not influence the recommendations, 259 (95.9%) didn't declare the interest conflicts of guideline developers. Guidelines downloaded from Internet and with updated versions yielded higher quality than the rest.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1893-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Although numerous guidelines were produced in China, the quality was generally low. Focusing on improving the quality of Chinese guidelines, rather than continuing to produce them in great quantity, is urgently needed.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>BackgroundClinical guidelines are an important tool for improving service quality, the benefits of guidelines depend on their quality. In China, there has been a great increase in production of guidelines. However, little is known about their quality.MethodWe identified Chinese guidelines published between 2006 and 2010 by searching three Chinese full-text databases, major Chinese guidelines websites and Google. Three appraisers independently evaluated each guideline by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Subgroup analyses were performed according to source, title, version, aspect of care and developer of guidelines.ResultsA total of 327 guidelines were eligible and 57 were excluded for their lacking of any account of the guideline development methodology. Of the 270 guidelines, 77 (28.5%) can be recommended, 6 (2.2%) were evidence-based guidelines. Sixteen (5.9%) guidelines described the methods used to search for evidence, 61 (22.6%) appraised the quality of evidence and 53 (19.6%) graded the strength of recommendations. Two guidelines declared the involvement of methodological experts and none reported considering patients’ values. 29 (10.7%) guidelines received drug company sponsorship but only two declared the views of the funding bodies did not influence the recommendations, 259 (95.9%) didn't declare the interest conflicts of guideline developers. Guidelines downloaded from Internet and with updated versions yielded higher quality than the rest.ConclusionsAlthough numerous guidelines were produced in China, the quality was generally low. Focusing on improving the quality of Chinese guidelines, rather than continuing to produce them in great quantity, is urgently needed.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01891.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Control beliefs are related to smoking prevention in prenatal care</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01891.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Control beliefs are related to smoking prevention in prenatal care</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sakari Lemola, Yvonne Meyer-Leu, Jakub Samochowiec, Alexander Grob</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:25:29.853777-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01891.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01891.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01891.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1891-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Background</h4><div class="para"><p>Smoking during pregnancy is one of the most important avoidable health risks for the unborn child. Gynaecologists and midwives play a fundamental role in the prevention of smoking during pregnancy. However, a large number of health care practitioners still do not address smoking in pregnant patients.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1891-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>We examined whether gynaecologists and midwives engage in screening and counselling of pregnant women and conducting interventions to prevent smoking during pregnancy. Further, we examined the role of gynaecologists’ and midwives’ control beliefs. Control beliefs involve efficacy expectations – the practitioner's confidence in his capacity to conduct prevention efforts adequately – and outcome expectations – the practitioner's expectation that such prevention efforts are successful in general.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1891-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A total of 486 gynaecologists and 366 midwives completed a questionnaire on screening of smoking, counselling and other interventions they conduct to prevent smoking during pregnancy. Moreover, gynaecologists and midwives rated their control beliefs regarding their influence on pregnant patients’ smoking habits.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1891-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>The majority of gynaecologists and midwives reported screening all pregnant patients regarding smoking, explaining the risks and recommending smoking cessation. By contrast, only a minority engages in more extensive prevention efforts. Strong control beliefs were predictive of a higher likelihood of screening and counselling, as well as of engaging in more extensive interventions.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1891-sec-0005" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The findings point to the importance of strengthening gynaecologists’ and midwives’ control beliefs by professional education and training on smoking prevention.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>BackgroundSmoking during pregnancy is one of the most important avoidable health risks for the unborn child. Gynaecologists and midwives play a fundamental role in the prevention of smoking during pregnancy. However, a large number of health care practitioners still do not address smoking in pregnant patients.ObjectivesWe examined whether gynaecologists and midwives engage in screening and counselling of pregnant women and conducting interventions to prevent smoking during pregnancy. Further, we examined the role of gynaecologists’ and midwives’ control beliefs. Control beliefs involve efficacy expectations – the practitioner's confidence in his capacity to conduct prevention efforts adequately – and outcome expectations – the practitioner's expectation that such prevention efforts are successful in general.MethodsA total of 486 gynaecologists and 366 midwives completed a questionnaire on screening of smoking, counselling and other interventions they conduct to prevent smoking during pregnancy. Moreover, gynaecologists and midwives rated their control beliefs regarding their influence on pregnant patients’ smoking habits.ResultsThe majority of gynaecologists and midwives reported screening all pregnant patients regarding smoking, explaining the risks and recommending smoking cessation. By contrast, only a minority engages in more extensive prevention efforts. Strong control beliefs were predictive of a higher likelihood of screening and counselling, as well as of engaging in more extensive interventions.ConclusionsThe findings point to the importance of strengthening gynaecologists’ and midwives’ control beliefs by professional education and training on smoking prevention.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01885.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Estimating measurement error when annualizing health care costs</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01885.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Estimating measurement error when annualizing health care costs</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ariel Linden, Steven J. Samuels</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-29T19:25:22.420258-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01885.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01885.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01885.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1885-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objective</h4><div class="para"><p>Health insurers routinely annualize members’ health care costs for reporting, predicting high cost cases and evaluating health management programmes. Annualization is the practice of extrapolating to a yearly cost from less than a year of data. In this paper, we systematically estimate the measurement error inherent in this approach.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1885-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Study design</h4><div class="para"><p>The paper uses a retrospective observational study using longitudinal claims data from three types of insured populations: Medicare managed care, public employees and a self-insured employer.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1885-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>The unit of analysis was a block ‘year’ consisting of 12 consecutive months of cost data for any individual member. These blocks were constructed recursively allowing use of all available data that an individual could contribute. We tested the accuracy of the annualized costs by calculating the absolute error (AE) representing the difference, in dollars, between the actual annual costs and the predicted annual costs, and the absolute percentage error (APE) which is the absolute error divided by the actual 12-month costs.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1885-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Under the best case scenario (when 11 months of data were used to annualize costs), the mean AE ranged from approximately $2700 for the Medicare population to about $400 for the two working-aged populations; and the mean APE ranged from 9.6% to 11.0% in the three populations. Accuracy diminished systematically with fewer months of available data.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1885-sec-0005" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Due to the largely unpredictable nature of monthly costs, annualization can produce substantial measurement error. Given the importance of cost metrics for decision making, we offer several alternative approaches that insurers should consider to improve measurement accuracy.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>ObjectiveHealth insurers routinely annualize members’ health care costs for reporting, predicting high cost cases and evaluating health management programmes. Annualization is the practice of extrapolating to a yearly cost from less than a year of data. In this paper, we systematically estimate the measurement error inherent in this approach.Study designThe paper uses a retrospective observational study using longitudinal claims data from three types of insured populations: Medicare managed care, public employees and a self-insured employer.MethodsThe unit of analysis was a block ‘year’ consisting of 12 consecutive months of cost data for any individual member. These blocks were constructed recursively allowing use of all available data that an individual could contribute. We tested the accuracy of the annualized costs by calculating the absolute error (AE) representing the difference, in dollars, between the actual annual costs and the predicted annual costs, and the absolute percentage error (APE) which is the absolute error divided by the actual 12-month costs.ResultsUnder the best case scenario (when 11 months of data were used to annualize costs), the mean AE ranged from approximately $2700 for the Medicare population to about $400 for the two working-aged populations; and the mean APE ranged from 9.6% to 11.0% in the three populations. Accuracy diminished systematically with fewer months of available data.ConclusionsDue to the largely unpredictable nature of monthly costs, annualization can produce substantial measurement error. Given the importance of cost metrics for decision making, we offer several alternative approaches that insurers should consider to improve measurement accuracy.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01886.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Factors influencing doctors’ selection of dabigatran in non-valvular atrial fibrillation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01886.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Factors influencing doctors’ selection of dabigatran in non-valvular atrial fibrillation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cindy Huang, Michele Siu, Lily Vu, Soo Wong, Jaekyu Shin</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-26T19:47:34.443253-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01886.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01886.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01886.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1886-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>This study was designed to examine the factors that influence doctors’ decision in initiating or switching from warfarin to dabigratran.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1886-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>A survey questionnaire was sent to 181 doctors who were most likely to prescribe dabigatran (e.g. cardiologists and general internists) at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center between November 2011 and February 2012. Survey participants were asked to complete an electronic or a paper version of the questionnaire, which consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions. Fisher's exact test and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test were used to compare survey responses between cardiologists and general internists.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1886-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>A total of 65 survey responses were received (35.9% response rate). There were 13 cardiologists and 51 general internists who participated in the study. Cost (25%), renal function (21%) and CHADS
<sub>2</sub> score (18%) were the three factors doctors considered most often to determine a patient's eligibility for dabigatran in warfarin-naïve patients. On the other hand, histories of unstable international normalized ratio (37%) and missed appointments (17%) along with cost (19%) were most often considered in patients on warfarin. Cardiologists had prescribed dabigatran more often and had a significantly higher level of comfort with prescribing the drug than general internists (<em>P</em> = 0.003; 77% vs. 27%).</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1886-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Cost was the most important factor influencing doctors’ decision to prescribe dabigatran. Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran as well as patient preference were additional factors influencing their decision. General internists were less comfortable with prescribing dabigatran than cardiologists.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectivesThis study was designed to examine the factors that influence doctors’ decision in initiating or switching from warfarin to dabigratran.MethodA survey questionnaire was sent to 181 doctors who were most likely to prescribe dabigatran (e.g. cardiologists and general internists) at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center between November 2011 and February 2012. Survey participants were asked to complete an electronic or a paper version of the questionnaire, which consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions. Fisher's exact test and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test were used to compare survey responses between cardiologists and general internists.ResultsA total of 65 survey responses were received (35.9% response rate). There were 13 cardiologists and 51 general internists who participated in the study. Cost (25%), renal function (21%) and CHADS
2 score (18%) were the three factors doctors considered most often to determine a patient's eligibility for dabigatran in warfarin-naïve patients. On the other hand, histories of unstable international normalized ratio (37%) and missed appointments (17%) along with cost (19%) were most often considered in patients on warfarin. Cardiologists had prescribed dabigatran more often and had a significantly higher level of comfort with prescribing the drug than general internists (P = 0.003; 77% vs. 27%).ConclusionsCost was the most important factor influencing doctors’ decision to prescribe dabigatran. Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran as well as patient preference were additional factors influencing their decision. General internists were less comfortable with prescribing dabigatran than cardiologists.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01873.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: a clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01873.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: a clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juping Yan, Jie Min, Bo Zhou</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-18T19:38:06.156191-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01873.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01873.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01873.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1873-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Objective</h4><div class="para"><p>The objective of this study was to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines providing diagnostic recommendations on pheochromocytoma (PHEO) using the new Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument and to promote the development of clinical guidelines.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1873-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Research design and methods</h4><div class="para"><p>We searched MEDLINE and electronic databases for guidelines published between 2001 and 2010 regarding the diagnosis of PHEO. The methodological quality of guidelines for three fields for the diagnosis of PHEO was evaluated using the new AGREE II instrument by two independent appraisers. We also compared two different types of guidelines to determine the superior guideline.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1873-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Four special guidelines and six general guidelines related to the diagnosis of PHEO were included in the study. According to AGREE II, two guidelines performed well in recommending biochemical evaluations. One guideline was good for radiodiagnosis, but no guideline was good for recommending genetic testing. The best-performing domain of the AGREE II instrument was domain 1 (D1) (scope and purpose), while the worst performing domain was D5 (applicability) in both types of guidelines. The special guideline was significantly better than the general guideline in D4 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), while the general guideline performed better in D6. There were no differences in the other four domains.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1873-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>The quality and rigour of guidelines for the diagnosis of PHEO vary. It is difficult to identify one guideline that performed well in all three fields for the diagnosis of PHEO based on the AGREE II instrument. Therefore, additional studies and greater efforts should be taken to provide high-quality guidelines that serve as a useful and reliable tool for clinical decision making in diagnosing PHEO according to the AGREE II instrument.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines providing diagnostic recommendations on pheochromocytoma (PHEO) using the new Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument and to promote the development of clinical guidelines.Research design and methodsWe searched MEDLINE and electronic databases for guidelines published between 2001 and 2010 regarding the diagnosis of PHEO. The methodological quality of guidelines for three fields for the diagnosis of PHEO was evaluated using the new AGREE II instrument by two independent appraisers. We also compared two different types of guidelines to determine the superior guideline.ResultsFour special guidelines and six general guidelines related to the diagnosis of PHEO were included in the study. According to AGREE II, two guidelines performed well in recommending biochemical evaluations. One guideline was good for radiodiagnosis, but no guideline was good for recommending genetic testing. The best-performing domain of the AGREE II instrument was domain 1 (D1) (scope and purpose), while the worst performing domain was D5 (applicability) in both types of guidelines. The special guideline was significantly better than the general guideline in D4 (P &lt; 0.01), while the general guideline performed better in D6. There were no differences in the other four domains.ConclusionsThe quality and rigour of guidelines for the diagnosis of PHEO vary. It is difficult to identify one guideline that performed well in all three fields for the diagnosis of PHEO based on the AGREE II instrument. Therefore, additional studies and greater efforts should be taken to provide high-quality guidelines that serve as a useful and reliable tool for clinical decision making in diagnosing PHEO according to the AGREE II instrument.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01874.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Causal diagrams, gastroesophageal reflux and erosive oesophagitis</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01874.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Causal diagrams, gastroesophageal reflux and erosive oesophagitis</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eyal Shahar</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-16T19:35:38.368778-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01874.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01874.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01874.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Discussion paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1874-sec-5001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Gastroesophageal reflux and its consequences have inspired numerous research questions in recent years: are non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive oesophagitis phenotypic expressions of gastroesophageal reflux disease? Why do patients with NERD not respond to treatment as well as patients with erosive oesophagitis? What is the natural history of NERD? Causal diagrams, coupled with conditional probabilities, offer clear and surprising answers.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Gastroesophageal reflux and its consequences have inspired numerous research questions in recent years: are non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive oesophagitis phenotypic expressions of gastroesophageal reflux disease? Why do patients with NERD not respond to treatment as well as patients with erosive oesophagitis? What is the natural history of NERD? Causal diagrams, coupled with conditional probabilities, offer clear and surprising answers.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01875.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The usefulness of lean six sigma to the development of a clinical pathway for hip fractures</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01875.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The usefulness of lean six sigma to the development of a clinical pathway for hip fractures</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerard C. Niemeijer, Elvira Flikweert, Albert Trip, Ronald J. M. M. Does, Kees T. B. Ahaus, Anja F. Boot, Klaus W. Wendt</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-11T05:50:23.335377-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01875.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01875.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01875.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1875-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>The objective of this study was to show the usefulness of lean six sigma (LSS) for the development of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1875-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A single centre, both retrospective and prospective, non-randomized controlled study design was used to identify the variables of a prolonged length of stay (LOS) for hip fractures in the elderly and to measure the effect of the process improvements – with the aim of improving efficiency of care and reducing the LOS.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1875-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>The project identified several variables influencing LOS, and interventions were designed to improve the process of care. Significant results were achieved by reducing both the average LOS by 4.2 days (−31%) and the average duration of surgery by 57 minutes (−36%). The average LOS of patients discharged to a nursing home reduced by 4.4 days.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1875-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>The findings of this study show a successful application of LSS methodology within the development of a clinical pathway. Further research is needed to explore the effect of the use of LSS methodology at clinical outcome and quality of life.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Aims and objectivesThe objective of this study was to show the usefulness of lean six sigma (LSS) for the development of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway.MethodsA single centre, both retrospective and prospective, non-randomized controlled study design was used to identify the variables of a prolonged length of stay (LOS) for hip fractures in the elderly and to measure the effect of the process improvements – with the aim of improving efficiency of care and reducing the LOS.ResultsThe project identified several variables influencing LOS, and interventions were designed to improve the process of care. Significant results were achieved by reducing both the average LOS by 4.2 days (−31%) and the average duration of surgery by 57 minutes (−36%). The average LOS of patients discharged to a nursing home reduced by 4.4 days.ConclusionThe findings of this study show a successful application of LSS methodology within the development of a clinical pathway. Further research is needed to explore the effect of the use of LSS methodology at clinical outcome and quality of life.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01879.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards: a framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01879.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards: a framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Valerie Ruhe, J. Donald Boudreau</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-11T03:08:07.256464-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01879.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01879.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01879.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="section" id="jep1879-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>Based on input from 400 stakeholders over 6 years, the 2011 Program Evaluation Standards represents an in-depth analysis of values, meaning and measurement and their relationships in programme evaluation. Evaluation quality is achieved by balancing five attributes: utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy and evaluation accountability. These attributes are used to organize 30 standards, 200 strategies and 197 hazards.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1879-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>In response to a call from the authors of the standards, we have used them to guide our meta-evaluation of McGill's undergraduate physicianship programme.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1879-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>Our findings show how the standards illuminate the tensions, dilemmas and hazards inherent in all stages of programme evaluation studies and offer helpful strategies for designing and conducting high-quality evaluation studies.</p></div></div><div class="section" id="jep1879-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusions</h4><div class="para"><p>Based on our experience, the third edition needs to be used as a reference document in all stages of evaluations of medical education programmes.</p></div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectivesBased on input from 400 stakeholders over 6 years, the 2011 Program Evaluation Standards represents an in-depth analysis of values, meaning and measurement and their relationships in programme evaluation. Evaluation quality is achieved by balancing five attributes: utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy and evaluation accountability. These attributes are used to organize 30 standards, 200 strategies and 197 hazards.MethodIn response to a call from the authors of the standards, we have used them to guide our meta-evaluation of McGill's undergraduate physicianship programme.ResultsOur findings show how the standards illuminate the tensions, dilemmas and hazards inherent in all stages of programme evaluation studies and offer helpful strategies for designing and conducting high-quality evaluation studies.ConclusionsBased on our experience, the third edition needs to be used as a reference document in all stages of evaluations of medical education programmes.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01876.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Testing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research on health care innovations from South Yorkshire</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01876.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Testing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research on health care innovations from South Yorkshire</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Irene Ilott, Kate Gerrish, Andrew Booth, Becky Field</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-04T19:32:57.338135-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01876.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01876.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01876.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1876-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4><div class="para"><p>There is an international imperative to implement research into clinical practice to improve health care. Understanding the dynamics of change requires knowledge from theoretical and empirical studies. This paper presents a novel approach to testing a new meta theoretical framework: the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1876-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Method</h4><div class="para"><p>The utility of the Framework was evaluated using a post hoc, deductive analysis of 11 narrative accounts of innovation in health care services and practice from England, collected in 2010. A matrix, comprising the five domains and 39 constructs of the Framework was developed to examine the coherence of the terminology, to compare results across contexts and to identify new theoretical developments.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1876-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>The Framework captured the complexity of implementation across 11 diverse examples, offering theoretically informed, comprehensive coverage. The Framework drew attention to relevant points in individual cases together with patterns across cases; for example, all were internally developed innovations that brought direct or indirect patient advantage. In 10 cases, the change was led by clinicians. Most initiatives had been maintained for several years and there was evidence of spread in six examples. Areas for further development within the Framework include sustainability and patient/public engagement in implementation.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1876-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>Our analysis suggests that this conceptual framework has the potential to offer useful insights, whether as part of a situational analysis or by developing context-specific propositions for hypothesis testing. Such studies are vital now that innovation is being promoted as core business for health care.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale, aims and objectives
There is an international imperative to implement research into clinical practice to improve health care. Understanding the dynamics of change requires knowledge from theoretical and empirical studies. This paper presents a novel approach to testing a new meta theoretical framework: the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.


Method
The utility of the Framework was evaluated using a post hoc, deductive analysis of 11 narrative accounts of innovation in health care services and practice from England, collected in 2010. A matrix, comprising the five domains and 39 constructs of the Framework was developed to examine the coherence of the terminology, to compare results across contexts and to identify new theoretical developments.


Results
The Framework captured the complexity of implementation across 11 diverse examples, offering theoretically informed, comprehensive coverage. The Framework drew attention to relevant points in individual cases together with patterns across cases; for example, all were internally developed innovations that brought direct or indirect patient advantage. In 10 cases, the change was led by clinicians. Most initiatives had been maintained for several years and there was evidence of spread in six examples. Areas for further development within the Framework include sustainability and patient/public engagement in implementation.


Conclusion
Our analysis suggests that this conceptual framework has the potential to offer useful insights, whether as part of a situational analysis or by developing context-specific propositions for hypothesis testing. Such studies are vital now that innovation is being promoted as core business for health care.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01877.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01877.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas, Regina Stella Spagnuolo, Amélia Kamegasawa, Leandro Gobbo Braz, Adriana Polachini do Valle, Eliane Chaves Jorge, Hugo Hyung Bok Yoo, Antônio José Maria Cataneo, Ione Corrêa, Fernanda Bono Fukushima, Paulo do Nascimento, Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo, Marise Silva Teixeira, Edison Iglesias de Oliveira Vidal, Solange Ramires Daher, Regina El Dib</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-07-03T00:18:00.876044-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01877.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01877.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01877.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="section" id="jep1877-sec-0001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Rationale and aim</h4><div class="para"><p>The aims of the Cochrane systematic reviews are to make readily available and up-to-date information for clinical practice, offering consistent evidence and straightforward recommendations. In 2004, we evaluated the conclusions from Cochrane systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in terms of their recommendations for clinical practice and found that 47.83% of them had insufficient evidence for use in clinical practice. We proposed to reanalyze the reviews to evaluate whether this percentage had significantly decreased.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1877-sec-0002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Methods</h4><div class="para"><p>A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2011) was conducted. We randomly selected reviews across all 52 Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1877-sec-0003" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Results</h4><div class="para"><p>We analyzed 1128 completed systematic reviews. Of these, 45.30% concluded that the interventions studied were likely to be beneficial, of which only 2.04% recommended no further research. In total, 45.04% of the reviews reported that the evidence did not support either benefit or harm, of which 0.8% did not recommend further studies and 44.24% recommended additional studies; the latter has decreased from our previous study with a difference of 3.59%.</p></div></div>
<div class="section" id="jep1877-sec-0004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><h4>Conclusion</h4><div class="para"><p>Only a small number of the Cochrane collaboration's systematic reviews support clinical interventions with no need for additional research. A larger number of high-quality randomized clinical trials are necessary to change the ‘insufficient evidence’ scenario for clinical practice illustrated by the Cochrane database. It is recommended that we should produce higher-quality primary studies in active collaboration and consultation with global scholars and societies so that this can represent a major component of methodological advance in this context.</p></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>


Rationale and aim
The aims of the Cochrane systematic reviews are to make readily available and up-to-date information for clinical practice, offering consistent evidence and straightforward recommendations. In 2004, we evaluated the conclusions from Cochrane systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in terms of their recommendations for clinical practice and found that 47.83% of them had insufficient evidence for use in clinical practice. We proposed to reanalyze the reviews to evaluate whether this percentage had significantly decreased.


Methods
A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2011) was conducted. We randomly selected reviews across all 52 Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups.


Results
We analyzed 1128 completed systematic reviews. Of these, 45.30% concluded that the interventions studied were likely to be beneficial, of which only 2.04% recommended no further research. In total, 45.04% of the reviews reported that the evidence did not support either benefit or harm, of which 0.8% did not recommend further studies and 44.24% recommended additional studies; the latter has decreased from our previous study with a difference of 3.59%.


Conclusion
Only a small number of the Cochrane collaboration's systematic reviews support clinical interventions with no need for additional research. A larger number of high-quality randomized clinical trials are necessary to change the ‘insufficient evidence’ scenario for clinical practice illustrated by the Cochrane database. It is recommended that we should produce higher-quality primary studies in active collaboration and consultation with global scholars and societies so that this can represent a major component of methodological advance in this context.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01867.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Hospital patients' reports of medical errors and undesirable events in their health care</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01867.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hospital patients' reports of medical errors and undesirable events in their health care</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel E. Davis, Nick Sevdalis, Graham Neale, Rachel Massey, Charles A. Vincent</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-06-12T19:50:44.832845-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01867.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01867.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01867.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> To investigate hospital patients' reports of undesirable events in their health care.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Design </b> Cross-sectional mixed methods design.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Participants </b> A total of 80 medical and surgical patients (mean age 58, 56 male).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Intervention </b> Patients were interviewed post-discharge using a survey to assess patient reports of errors or problems in their care. Patients' medical records and notes were also reviewed.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Main outcome measures </b> Frequency of health care process problems, medical complications and interpersonal problems, and patient willingness to report an undesirable event in their care.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> In total, 258 undesirable events were reported (rate of 3.2 per person), including 136 interpersonal problems, 90 medical complications and 32 health care process problems. Patients identified a number of events that were reported in the medical records (30 out of 36). In addition, patients reported events that were not recorded in the medical records. Patients were more willing (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) to report undesirable events to a researcher (as in the present case) than to a local or national reporting system.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Patients appear able to report undesirable events that occur in their health care management over and above those that are recorded in their medical records. However, patients appear more willing to report these incidents for the purpose of a study rather than to an established incident reporting system. Interventions aimed at educating and encouraging patients about incident reporting systems need to be developed in order to enhance this important contribution patients could make to improving patient safety.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Objective  To investigate hospital patients' reports of undesirable events in their health care.Design  Cross-sectional mixed methods design.Participants  A total of 80 medical and surgical patients (mean age 58, 56 male).Intervention  Patients were interviewed post-discharge using a survey to assess patient reports of errors or problems in their care. Patients' medical records and notes were also reviewed.Main outcome measures  Frequency of health care process problems, medical complications and interpersonal problems, and patient willingness to report an undesirable event in their care.Results  In total, 258 undesirable events were reported (rate of 3.2 per person), including 136 interpersonal problems, 90 medical complications and 32 health care process problems. Patients identified a number of events that were reported in the medical records (30 out of 36). In addition, patients reported events that were not recorded in the medical records. Patients were more willing (P &lt; 0.05) to report undesirable events to a researcher (as in the present case) than to a local or national reporting system.Conclusion  Patients appear able to report undesirable events that occur in their health care management over and above those that are recorded in their medical records. However, patients appear more willing to report these incidents for the purpose of a study rather than to an established incident reporting system. Interventions aimed at educating and encouraging patients about incident reporting systems need to be developed in order to enhance this important contribution patients could make to improving patient safety.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01870.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines for pressure risk management in a home nursing setting</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01870.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines for pressure risk management in a home nursing setting</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suzanne Kapp</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-06-05T19:59:23.766339-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01870.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01870.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01870.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale </b> This paper reports an initiative which promoted evidence-based practice in pressure risk assessment and management among home nursing clients in Melbourne, Australia.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aim and objectives </b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the introduction and uptake of the Australian Wound Management Association Guidelines for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> In 2007 a pilot study was conducted. Nurse perspectives (n=21) were obtained via survey and a client profile (n=218) was generated. Audit of the uptake and continued use of the pressure risk screening tool, during the pilot study and later once implemented as standard practice organizational wide, was conducted.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Nurses at the pilot site successfully implemented the practice guidelines, pressure risk screening was adopted and supporting resources were well received. Most clients were at low risk of pressure ulcer development. The pilot site maintained and extended their pilot study success, ensuring more than 90% of clients were screened for pressure risk over the 18 months which followed. All other sites performed less well initially, however subsequently improved, meeting the pilot sites success after 18 months. Two years later, the organization continues to screen more than 90% of all clients for pressure risk.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Implementation of clinical practice guidelines was successful in the pilot project and pressure risk screening became a well-adopted practice. Success continued following organizational wide implementation. Pilot study findings suggest it may be prudent to monitor the pressure ulcer risk status of low risk clients so as to prevent increasing risk and pressure ulcer development among this group.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale  This paper reports an initiative which promoted evidence-based practice in pressure risk assessment and management among home nursing clients in Melbourne, Australia.Aim and objectives  The aim of this study was to evaluate the introduction and uptake of the Australian Wound Management Association Guidelines for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.Method  In 2007 a pilot study was conducted. Nurse perspectives (n=21) were obtained via survey and a client profile (n=218) was generated. Audit of the uptake and continued use of the pressure risk screening tool, during the pilot study and later once implemented as standard practice organizational wide, was conducted.Results  Nurses at the pilot site successfully implemented the practice guidelines, pressure risk screening was adopted and supporting resources were well received. Most clients were at low risk of pressure ulcer development. The pilot site maintained and extended their pilot study success, ensuring more than 90% of clients were screened for pressure risk over the 18 months which followed. All other sites performed less well initially, however subsequently improved, meeting the pilot sites success after 18 months. Two years later, the organization continues to screen more than 90% of all clients for pressure risk.Conclusion  Implementation of clinical practice guidelines was successful in the pilot project and pressure risk screening became a well-adopted practice. Success continued following organizational wide implementation. Pilot study findings suggest it may be prudent to monitor the pressure ulcer risk status of low risk clients so as to prevent increasing risk and pressure ulcer development among this group.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01868.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Identifying poor performance among doctors in NHS organizations</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01868.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Identifying poor performance among doctors in NHS organizations</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel Locke, Samantha Scallan, Camilla Leach, Mark Rickenbach</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-06-05T19:59:21.689253-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01868.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01868.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01868.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aim </b> To account for the means by which poor performance among career doctors is identified by National Health Service organizations, whether the tools are considered effective and how these processes may be strengthened in the light of revalidation and the requirement for doctors to demonstrate their fitness to practice.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> This study sought to look beyond the ‘doctor as individual’; as well as considering the typical approaches to managing the practice of an individual, the systems within which the doctor is working were reviewed, as these are also relevant to standards of performance. A qualitative review was undertaken consisting of a literature review of current practice, a policy review of current documentation from 15 trusts in one deanery locality, and 14 semi-structured interviews with respondents with an overview of processes in use. The framework for the analysis of the data considered tools at three levels: individual, team and organizational.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Tools are, in the main, reactive – with an individual focus. They rely on colleagues and others to speak out, so their effectiveness is hindered by a reluctance to do so. Tools can lack an evidence base for their use, and there is limited linking of data across contexts and tools.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> There is more work to be done in evaluating current tools and developing stronger processes. Linkage between data sources needs to be improved and proactive tools at the organizational level need further development to help with the early identification of performance issues. This would also assist in balancing a wider systems approach with a current over emphasis on individual doctors.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Aim  To account for the means by which poor performance among career doctors is identified by National Health Service organizations, whether the tools are considered effective and how these processes may be strengthened in the light of revalidation and the requirement for doctors to demonstrate their fitness to practice.Method  This study sought to look beyond the ‘doctor as individual’; as well as considering the typical approaches to managing the practice of an individual, the systems within which the doctor is working were reviewed, as these are also relevant to standards of performance. A qualitative review was undertaken consisting of a literature review of current practice, a policy review of current documentation from 15 trusts in one deanery locality, and 14 semi-structured interviews with respondents with an overview of processes in use. The framework for the analysis of the data considered tools at three levels: individual, team and organizational.Results  Tools are, in the main, reactive – with an individual focus. They rely on colleagues and others to speak out, so their effectiveness is hindered by a reluctance to do so. Tools can lack an evidence base for their use, and there is limited linking of data across contexts and tools.Conclusions  There is more work to be done in evaluating current tools and developing stronger processes. Linkage between data sources needs to be improved and proactive tools at the organizational level need further development to help with the early identification of performance issues. This would also assist in balancing a wider systems approach with a current over emphasis on individual doctors.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01871.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Information-searching behaviors of main and allied health professionals: a nationwide survey in Taiwan</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01871.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Information-searching behaviors of main and allied health professionals: a nationwide survey in Taiwan</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yi-Hao Weng, Ken N. Kuo, Chun-Yuh Yang, Heng-Lien Lo, Ya-Hui Shih, Ya-Wen Chiu</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-06-03T20:35:21.344885-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01871.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01871.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01871.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> There are a variety of resources to obtain health information, but few studies have examined if main and allied health professionals prefer different methods. The current study was to investigate their information-searching behaviours.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> A constructed questionnaire survey was conducted from January through April 2011 in nationwide regional hospitals of Taiwan. Questionnaires were mailed to main professionals (physicians and nurses) and allied professionals (pharmacists, physical therapists, technicians and others), with 6160 valid returns collected.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Among all professional groups, the most commonly used resource for seeking health information was a Web portal, followed by colleague consultations and continuing education. Physicians more often accessed Internet-based professional resources (online databases, electronic journals and electronic books) than the other groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, physical therapists more often accessed printed resources (printed journals and textbooks) than the other specialists (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). And nurses, physical therapists and technicians more often asked colleagues and used continuing education than the other groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The most commonly used online database was Micromedex for pharmacists and MEDLINE for physicians, technicians and physical therapists. Nurses more often accessed Chinese-language databases rather than English-language databases (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> This national survey depicts the information-searching pattern of various health professionals. There were significant differences between and within main and allied health professionals in their information searching. The data provide clinical implications for strategies to promote the accessing of evidence-based information.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  There are a variety of resources to obtain health information, but few studies have examined if main and allied health professionals prefer different methods. The current study was to investigate their information-searching behaviours.Methods  A constructed questionnaire survey was conducted from January through April 2011 in nationwide regional hospitals of Taiwan. Questionnaires were mailed to main professionals (physicians and nurses) and allied professionals (pharmacists, physical therapists, technicians and others), with 6160 valid returns collected.Results  Among all professional groups, the most commonly used resource for seeking health information was a Web portal, followed by colleague consultations and continuing education. Physicians more often accessed Internet-based professional resources (online databases, electronic journals and electronic books) than the other groups (P &lt; 0.05). In contrast, physical therapists more often accessed printed resources (printed journals and textbooks) than the other specialists (P &lt; 0.05). And nurses, physical therapists and technicians more often asked colleagues and used continuing education than the other groups (P &lt; 0.01). The most commonly used online database was Micromedex for pharmacists and MEDLINE for physicians, technicians and physical therapists. Nurses more often accessed Chinese-language databases rather than English-language databases (P &lt; 0.001).Conclusions  This national survey depicts the information-searching pattern of various health professionals. There were significant differences between and within main and allied health professionals in their information searching. The data provide clinical implications for strategies to promote the accessing of evidence-based information.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01866.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Problem perception, technology and effectiveness in medical practice</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01866.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Problem perception, technology and effectiveness in medical practice</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leif Holmberg</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:39:06.110104-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01866.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01866.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01866.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Evidence-based medicine and clinical guidelines have been found difficult to implement in the clinical practice – mainly because lack of evidence quality and guidelines that, generally, do not account for variations in the medical cases. Variation in the medical cases enhances task uncertainty and uncertainty seems to be further enhanced through clinical guidelines. In this article, concept development is attempted, where task uncertainty is classified into a few medical problem-solving processes according to differences in medical technology and in the (initial) perception of the medical problem. Furthermore is argued the need for using different strategies in evaluating performance quality in medical health care depending on the variation in the degree of task uncertainty.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> Qualitative data about medical activities related to certain diseases are used to exemplify problem-solving processes representing different types of task uncertainty.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> It is argued that the main characteristics of medical problem-solving processes vary according to differences in medical technology and perception of perceived medical problem. Four main medical problem-solving processes are defined and demonstrated through empirical examples.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> What may be regarded as rational behaviour is different for each type of problem-solving processes. Consequently, the processes need different organizational settings and need to be evaluated according to different criteria. Furthermore, from a practical point of view, development and education related to problem perception would seem as important as development of medical technology.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Evidence-based medicine and clinical guidelines have been found difficult to implement in the clinical practice – mainly because lack of evidence quality and guidelines that, generally, do not account for variations in the medical cases. Variation in the medical cases enhances task uncertainty and uncertainty seems to be further enhanced through clinical guidelines. In this article, concept development is attempted, where task uncertainty is classified into a few medical problem-solving processes according to differences in medical technology and in the (initial) perception of the medical problem. Furthermore is argued the need for using different strategies in evaluating performance quality in medical health care depending on the variation in the degree of task uncertainty.Method  Qualitative data about medical activities related to certain diseases are used to exemplify problem-solving processes representing different types of task uncertainty.Results  It is argued that the main characteristics of medical problem-solving processes vary according to differences in medical technology and perception of perceived medical problem. Four main medical problem-solving processes are defined and demonstrated through empirical examples.Conclusion  What may be regarded as rational behaviour is different for each type of problem-solving processes. Consequently, the processes need different organizational settings and need to be evaluated according to different criteria. Furthermore, from a practical point of view, development and education related to problem perception would seem as important as development of medical technology.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01869.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Exploring sources of knowledge utilized in practice among Jordanian registered nurses</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01869.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exploring sources of knowledge utilized in practice among Jordanian registered nurses</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suhair Husni Al-Ghabeesh, Fathieh Abu-Moghli, Mahvash Salsali, Mohammad Saleh</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:38:24.22253-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01869.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01869.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01869.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Understanding sources of knowledge used in everyday practice is very helpful in improving the quality of health care services. There is a consensus in the literature that nurses mostly relied in their practice on experiential knowledge gained through their interactions with other members of health care professionals and patients. The general aim of this study is to explore the sources of knowledge Jordanian registered nurses use during their practice.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A descriptive correlational design was used to collect data from 539 Jordanian registered nurses from 10 hospitals using a self-administered questionnaire.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The mean year of experience of the sample was 7.08 years. Of the 615 questionnaires distributed, 555 were returned. This yields a response rate of 87.6%. Results revealed that the top five ranked sources used by Jordanian registered nurses include: the information that nurses learned during nursing education, personal experience in nursing over time, what was learned through providing care to patients, information gained through discussion between physicians and nurses about patients, and information from policy and procedure manuals.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Jordanian registered nurses recognize the value of research and that research utilization (RU) is an important issue and must not be ignored. The study has many implications for practice, education and research. Health care managers and decision makers need to play a more visible and instrumental role in encouraging RU to improve patients' quality of life.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Understanding sources of knowledge used in everyday practice is very helpful in improving the quality of health care services. There is a consensus in the literature that nurses mostly relied in their practice on experiential knowledge gained through their interactions with other members of health care professionals and patients. The general aim of this study is to explore the sources of knowledge Jordanian registered nurses use during their practice.Method  A descriptive correlational design was used to collect data from 539 Jordanian registered nurses from 10 hospitals using a self-administered questionnaire.Results  The mean year of experience of the sample was 7.08 years. Of the 615 questionnaires distributed, 555 were returned. This yields a response rate of 87.6%. Results revealed that the top five ranked sources used by Jordanian registered nurses include: the information that nurses learned during nursing education, personal experience in nursing over time, what was learned through providing care to patients, information gained through discussion between physicians and nurses about patients, and information from policy and procedure manuals.Conclusion  Jordanian registered nurses recognize the value of research and that research utilization (RU) is an important issue and must not be ignored. The study has many implications for practice, education and research. Health care managers and decision makers need to play a more visible and instrumental role in encouraging RU to improve patients' quality of life.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01865.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The first national pressure ulcer prevalence survey in county council and municipality settings in Sweden</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01865.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The first national pressure ulcer prevalence survey in county council and municipality settings in Sweden</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lena Gunningberg, Ami Hommel, Carina Bååth, Ewa Idvall</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:36:23.235528-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01865.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01865.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01865.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aim </b> To report data from the first national pressure ulcer prevalence survey in Sweden on prevalence, pressure ulcer categories, locations and preventive interventions for persons at risk for developing pressure ulcers.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> A cross-sectional research design was used in a total sample of 35 058 persons in hospitals and nursing homes. The methodology used was that recommended by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 16.6% in hospitals and 14.5% in nursing homes. Many persons at risk for developing pressure ulcers did not receive a pressure-reducing mattress (23.3–27.9%) or planned repositioning in bed (50.2–57.5%).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Despite great effort on the national level to encourage the prevention of pressure ulcers, the prevalence is high. Public reporting and benchmarking are now available, evidence-based guidelines have been disseminated and national goals have been set. Strategies for implementing practices outlined in the guidelines, meeting goals and changing attitudes must be further developed.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Aim  To report data from the first national pressure ulcer prevalence survey in Sweden on prevalence, pressure ulcer categories, locations and preventive interventions for persons at risk for developing pressure ulcers.Methods  A cross-sectional research design was used in a total sample of 35 058 persons in hospitals and nursing homes. The methodology used was that recommended by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.Results  The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 16.6% in hospitals and 14.5% in nursing homes. Many persons at risk for developing pressure ulcers did not receive a pressure-reducing mattress (23.3–27.9%) or planned repositioning in bed (50.2–57.5%).Conclusions  Despite great effort on the national level to encourage the prevention of pressure ulcers, the prevalence is high. Public reporting and benchmarking are now available, evidence-based guidelines have been disseminated and national goals have been set. Strategies for implementing practices outlined in the guidelines, meeting goals and changing attitudes must be further developed.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01864.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Is it time to abandon paper? The use of emails and the Internet for health services research – a cost-effectiveness and qualitative study</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01864.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Is it time to abandon paper? The use of emails and the Internet for health services research – a cost-effectiveness and qualitative study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Hunter, Katherine Corcoran, Stephen Leeder, Kerryn Phelps</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:36:14.402134-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01864.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01864.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01864.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale </b> A multidisciplinary primary care clinic in Sydney, Australia, was planning to use electronic questionnaires to measure patient-reported outcomes.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Semi-structured interviews with 20 patients were undertaken to explore, among other things, practical issues regarding different questionnaire formats. The response rates and costs of email versus postal invitations were also evaluated.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Compared with postal invitations, email invitations offered a cost-effective and practical alternative, with a greater proportion of patients volunteering for an interview. Assuming the interface is well-designed and user-friendly, many patients were happy to use the Internet to answer questionnaires. Most patients thought alternate formats should also be offered. Patients discussed advantages and disadvantages of the Internet format. Although more younger patients and females had given the clinic an email address; both sexes, and young and old patients, expressed strong preferences for either wanting or not wanting to use the Internet.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Researchers should consider using email invitations as a cost-effective first-line strategy to recruit patients to participate in health services research. Internet questionnaires are potentially cheaper than paper questionnaires, and the format is acceptable to many patients. However, for the time being, concurrent alternate formats need to be offered to ensure wider acceptability and to maximize response rates.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale  A multidisciplinary primary care clinic in Sydney, Australia, was planning to use electronic questionnaires to measure patient-reported outcomes.Methods  Semi-structured interviews with 20 patients were undertaken to explore, among other things, practical issues regarding different questionnaire formats. The response rates and costs of email versus postal invitations were also evaluated.Results  Compared with postal invitations, email invitations offered a cost-effective and practical alternative, with a greater proportion of patients volunteering for an interview. Assuming the interface is well-designed and user-friendly, many patients were happy to use the Internet to answer questionnaires. Most patients thought alternate formats should also be offered. Patients discussed advantages and disadvantages of the Internet format. Although more younger patients and females had given the clinic an email address; both sexes, and young and old patients, expressed strong preferences for either wanting or not wanting to use the Internet.Conclusion  Researchers should consider using email invitations as a cost-effective first-line strategy to recruit patients to participate in health services research. Internet questionnaires are potentially cheaper than paper questionnaires, and the format is acceptable to many patients. However, for the time being, concurrent alternate formats need to be offered to ensure wider acceptability and to maximize response rates.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01862.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Trends and variations in infant mortality among 47 prefectures in Japan</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01862.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trends and variations in infant mortality among 47 prefectures in Japan</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hiroki Mishina, Joan F. Hilton, John I. Takayama</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:35:57.691367-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01862.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01862.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01862.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> To determine IMR trends and regional variations among 47 prefectures in Japan and to identify associated population-based factors.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> We conducted an ecological study of infant mortality rate (IMR) by analyzing publicly available data from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Outcome measure for trend is the IMR for each of 47 prefectures from 1999 to 2007; for variation, IMRs for 2006 and 2007 in each prefecture were averaged. We considered as covariates prefecture-level variables related to public health, socio-economic status, clinical services and health care facilities. We conducted multivariate statistical analyses to determine covariates most strongly associated with both 1999–2007 IMR trends and 2006–2007 IMR.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The mean IMR decreased from 3.42 deaths per 1000 live births (range 2.1 to 5.1) in 1999 to 2.54 (range 1.5 to 4.4) in 2007; reductions were greater in prefectures with higher concentrations of public health nurses (PHNs) and nurses. In 2006–2007, nine prefectures had IMRs ≤ 2.25; eight had IMRs ≥ 3.0. When low-, moderate- and high-IMR prefectures were compared, per capita PHNs, maternal education, centralized water supply and household income were identified as significant covariates.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Both national and prefecture-level IMR in Japan decreased from 1999 to 2007; however, the degree of reduction varied by prefecture. Given that more nurses and PHNs per capita were associated with greater IMR reductions from 1999 to 2007 and more PHNs with lower 2006–2007 IMRs, distribution of preventive health services may play a major role in reducing regional disparities in IMR.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Objectives  To determine IMR trends and regional variations among 47 prefectures in Japan and to identify associated population-based factors.Methods  We conducted an ecological study of infant mortality rate (IMR) by analyzing publicly available data from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Outcome measure for trend is the IMR for each of 47 prefectures from 1999 to 2007; for variation, IMRs for 2006 and 2007 in each prefecture were averaged. We considered as covariates prefecture-level variables related to public health, socio-economic status, clinical services and health care facilities. We conducted multivariate statistical analyses to determine covariates most strongly associated with both 1999–2007 IMR trends and 2006–2007 IMR.Results  The mean IMR decreased from 3.42 deaths per 1000 live births (range 2.1 to 5.1) in 1999 to 2.54 (range 1.5 to 4.4) in 2007; reductions were greater in prefectures with higher concentrations of public health nurses (PHNs) and nurses. In 2006–2007, nine prefectures had IMRs ≤ 2.25; eight had IMRs ≥ 3.0. When low-, moderate- and high-IMR prefectures were compared, per capita PHNs, maternal education, centralized water supply and household income were identified as significant covariates.Conclusions  Both national and prefecture-level IMR in Japan decreased from 1999 to 2007; however, the degree of reduction varied by prefecture. Given that more nurses and PHNs per capita were associated with greater IMR reductions from 1999 to 2007 and more PHNs with lower 2006–2007 IMRs, distribution of preventive health services may play a major role in reducing regional disparities in IMR.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01861.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A vignette study to examine health care professionals' attitudes towards patient involvement in error prevention</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01861.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A vignette study to examine health care professionals' attitudes towards patient involvement in error prevention</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David L. B. Schwappach, Olga Frank, Rachel E. Davis</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:35:54.36306-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01861.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01861.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01861.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Various authorities recommend the participation of patients in promoting patient safety, but little is known about health care professionals' (HCPs') attitudes towards patients' involvement in safety-related behaviours.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> To investigate how HCPs evaluate patients' behaviours and HCP responses to patient involvement in the behaviour, relative to different aspects of the patient, the involved HCP and the potential error.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Design </b> Cross-sectional fractional factorial survey with seven factors embedded in two error scenarios (missed hand hygiene, medication error). Each survey included two randomized vignettes that described the potential error, a patient's reaction to that error and the HCP response to the patient.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Setting </b> Twelve hospitals in Switzerland.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Participants </b> A total of 1141 HCPs (response rate 45%).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Measurements </b> Approval of patients' behaviour, HCP response to the patient, anticipated effects on the patient–HCP relationship, HCPs' support for being asked the question, affective response to the vignettes. Outcomes were measured on 7-point scales.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Approval of patients' safety-related interventions was generally high and largely affected by patients' behaviour and correct identification of error. Anticipated effects on the patient–HCP relationship were much less positive, little correlated with approval of patients' behaviour and were mainly determined by the HCP response to intervening patients. HCPs expressed more favourable attitudes towards patients intervening about a medication error than about hand sanitation.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> This study provides the first insights into predictors of HCPs' attitudes towards patient engagement in safety. Future research is however required to assess the generalizability of the findings into practice before training can be designed to address critical issues.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Background  Various authorities recommend the participation of patients in promoting patient safety, but little is known about health care professionals' (HCPs') attitudes towards patients' involvement in safety-related behaviours.Objective  To investigate how HCPs evaluate patients' behaviours and HCP responses to patient involvement in the behaviour, relative to different aspects of the patient, the involved HCP and the potential error.Design  Cross-sectional fractional factorial survey with seven factors embedded in two error scenarios (missed hand hygiene, medication error). Each survey included two randomized vignettes that described the potential error, a patient's reaction to that error and the HCP response to the patient.Setting  Twelve hospitals in Switzerland.Participants  A total of 1141 HCPs (response rate 45%).Measurements  Approval of patients' behaviour, HCP response to the patient, anticipated effects on the patient–HCP relationship, HCPs' support for being asked the question, affective response to the vignettes. Outcomes were measured on 7-point scales.Results  Approval of patients' safety-related interventions was generally high and largely affected by patients' behaviour and correct identification of error. Anticipated effects on the patient–HCP relationship were much less positive, little correlated with approval of patients' behaviour and were mainly determined by the HCP response to intervening patients. HCPs expressed more favourable attitudes towards patients intervening about a medication error than about hand sanitation.Conclusions  This study provides the first insights into predictors of HCPs' attitudes towards patient engagement in safety. Future research is however required to assess the generalizability of the findings into practice before training can be designed to address critical issues.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01860.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Acute pain management and assessment: are guidelines being implemented in developing countries (Lebanon)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01860.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Acute pain management and assessment: are guidelines being implemented in developing countries (Lebanon)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abeer A. Zeitoun, Hani I. Dimassi, Bahija A. Chami, Nibal R. Chamoun</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-29T05:30:43.612874-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01860.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01860.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01860.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale </b> Pain assessment and treatment is influenced by subjective perception of pain. Despite the international efforts to implement guidelines and protocols for pain management, pain continues to be regarded as a complication rather than a primary problem. The literature pertaining to the adequacy of pain management in the Middle East is frail. This study focuses on revealing the implemented practices of initial pain assessment, follow-up and re-evaluation of pain treatment in Lebanese hospitals.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aim and objectives </b> The objective of this study is to evaluate the presence and effectiveness of acute pain management and its impact on the quality of life in hospitals throughout Lebanon, in both cancer and non-cancer populations.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> A Lebanese multi-centre, prospective, chart review study was conducted over a period of 3 months. Data on demographics, pain medication, dose, route, duration and adjunct pain management were collected. Appropriateness of pain management was determined as per World Health Organization guidelines. Institutional Review Board approvals were obtained from each hospital.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Results from 582 participants revealed that 50% of initial pain assessment intensity scores were based on the assumptions of health care professionals. Furthermore, as pain severity scores increased, the adequacy of pain management decreased. Only 22% of the patients had a daily follow-up, and the majority of those continued to receive inappropriate therapy.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> This study reflects the lack of a well-structured system for pain management in Lebanese hospitals. It underlines the need for pain research in the region. It also highlights the need for implementing the recommendations discussed to minimize risk and optimize pain management.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale  Pain assessment and treatment is influenced by subjective perception of pain. Despite the international efforts to implement guidelines and protocols for pain management, pain continues to be regarded as a complication rather than a primary problem. The literature pertaining to the adequacy of pain management in the Middle East is frail. This study focuses on revealing the implemented practices of initial pain assessment, follow-up and re-evaluation of pain treatment in Lebanese hospitals.Aim and objectives  The objective of this study is to evaluate the presence and effectiveness of acute pain management and its impact on the quality of life in hospitals throughout Lebanon, in both cancer and non-cancer populations.Methods  A Lebanese multi-centre, prospective, chart review study was conducted over a period of 3 months. Data on demographics, pain medication, dose, route, duration and adjunct pain management were collected. Appropriateness of pain management was determined as per World Health Organization guidelines. Institutional Review Board approvals were obtained from each hospital.Results  Results from 582 participants revealed that 50% of initial pain assessment intensity scores were based on the assumptions of health care professionals. Furthermore, as pain severity scores increased, the adequacy of pain management decreased. Only 22% of the patients had a daily follow-up, and the majority of those continued to receive inappropriate therapy.Conclusion  This study reflects the lack of a well-structured system for pain management in Lebanese hospitals. It underlines the need for pain research in the region. It also highlights the need for implementing the recommendations discussed to minimize risk and optimize pain management.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01854.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The medical student as a patient: attitudes towards involvement in the quality and safety of health care</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01854.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The medical student as a patient: attitudes towards involvement in the quality and safety of health care</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel E. Davis, Devavrata Joshi, Krishan Patel, M. Briggs, Charles A. Vincent</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-23T20:07:21.90928-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01854.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01854.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01854.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> In recent years, factors that affect patients' willingness and ability to participate in safety-relevant behaviours have been investigated. However, how trained healthcare professionals or medical students would feel participating in safety-relevant behaviours as a patient in hospital remains largely unexplored.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> To investigate medical students' willingness to participate in behaviours related to the quality and safety of their health care.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Design </b> A cross-sectional exploratory study using a survey that addressed willingness to participate in different behaviours recommended by current patient safety initiatives. Three types of interactional behaviours (asking factual or challenging questions, notifying doctors or nurses of errors/problems) and three non-interactional behaviours (choosing a hospital based on the safety record, bringing medicines and a list of allergies into hospital, and reporting an error to a national reporting system) were assessed.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Participants </b> One hundred and seventy-nine medical students from an inner city London teaching hospital participated in the study.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Findings </b> Students' willingness to participate was affected (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) by the action required by the patient and (for interactional behaviours) whether the patient was engaging in the specific action with a doctor or nurse. Students were least willing to ask ‘challenging’ questions to doctors and nurses and to report errors to a national reporting system. Doctors' and nurses' encouragement appeared to increase self-reported willingness to participate in behaviours where baseline willingness was low.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Similar to research on lay patient populations; medical students do not view involvement in safety-related behaviours equally. Interventions should be tailored at encouraging students to participate in behaviours they are less inclined to take on an active role in. Future research is required to examine students' motivations for participation in this important but heavily under-researched area.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Background  In recent years, factors that affect patients' willingness and ability to participate in safety-relevant behaviours have been investigated. However, how trained healthcare professionals or medical students would feel participating in safety-relevant behaviours as a patient in hospital remains largely unexplored.Objectives  To investigate medical students' willingness to participate in behaviours related to the quality and safety of their health care.Design  A cross-sectional exploratory study using a survey that addressed willingness to participate in different behaviours recommended by current patient safety initiatives. Three types of interactional behaviours (asking factual or challenging questions, notifying doctors or nurses of errors/problems) and three non-interactional behaviours (choosing a hospital based on the safety record, bringing medicines and a list of allergies into hospital, and reporting an error to a national reporting system) were assessed.Participants  One hundred and seventy-nine medical students from an inner city London teaching hospital participated in the study.Findings  Students' willingness to participate was affected (P &lt; 0.05) by the action required by the patient and (for interactional behaviours) whether the patient was engaging in the specific action with a doctor or nurse. Students were least willing to ask ‘challenging’ questions to doctors and nurses and to report errors to a national reporting system. Doctors' and nurses' encouragement appeared to increase self-reported willingness to participate in behaviours where baseline willingness was low.Conclusion  Similar to research on lay patient populations; medical students do not view involvement in safety-related behaviours equally. Interventions should be tailored at encouraging students to participate in behaviours they are less inclined to take on an active role in. Future research is required to examine students' motivations for participation in this important but heavily under-researched area.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01858.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Study protocol for a pilot study to explore the determinants of knowledge use in a medical education context</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01858.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Study protocol for a pilot study to explore the determinants of knowledge use in a medical education context</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Reeves, Karen Leslie, Lindsay Baker, Eileen Egan-Lee, France Légaré, Ivan Silver, Jay Rosenfield, Brian Hodges, Vernon Curran, Heather Armson, Simon Kitto</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-15T19:45:21.986142-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01858.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01858.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01858.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> While the science of knowledge translation (KT) has been growing steadily for the past decade in relation to understanding processes and actions which are embedded within clinical practice settings, little is known about how empirical knowledge is used within the medical education system. Despite an increase of research in this domain, we know very little about the contribution of this evidence in the development of medical students into effective physicians. This pilot study aims to: provide a synthesis of the evidence for educational strategies within medical education; explore the perceptions and experiences of faculty in undergraduate (UG) medical education in relation to their use of evidence in their educational practices; and illuminate how medical education evidence is formally integrated into a UG medical curriculum.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> The study will involve three phases. First, a scoping review of the medical education research literature will be undertaken to generate insight into the evidence available for curriculum development, teaching and assessment activities within this domain. Second, a content analysis of undergraduate courses at the University of Toronto will be undertaken to generate an additional insight into the extent that medical education research has been formally integrated into the UG curriculum for medical students at the University. Finally, a purposeful sample of 30–40 medical education leaders from a single large university, selected as it aims to deliver a rigorous research-oriented medical curriculum, will be interviewed to understand how they use the available evidence in their education practices.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Discussion </b> This study will lay the grounds to generate initial data into the determinants of knowledge use in a medical education context. In doing so, the findings will also inform the development of a larger, pan-Canadian study at medical schools that will generate a comprehensive account of the processes and challenges related to KT within an educational context. This larger study will also begin to explore the relevance of the Knowledge-to-Action model to a medical education context.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  While the science of knowledge translation (KT) has been growing steadily for the past decade in relation to understanding processes and actions which are embedded within clinical practice settings, little is known about how empirical knowledge is used within the medical education system. Despite an increase of research in this domain, we know very little about the contribution of this evidence in the development of medical students into effective physicians. This pilot study aims to: provide a synthesis of the evidence for educational strategies within medical education; explore the perceptions and experiences of faculty in undergraduate (UG) medical education in relation to their use of evidence in their educational practices; and illuminate how medical education evidence is formally integrated into a UG medical curriculum.Method  The study will involve three phases. First, a scoping review of the medical education research literature will be undertaken to generate insight into the evidence available for curriculum development, teaching and assessment activities within this domain. Second, a content analysis of undergraduate courses at the University of Toronto will be undertaken to generate an additional insight into the extent that medical education research has been formally integrated into the UG curriculum for medical students at the University. Finally, a purposeful sample of 30–40 medical education leaders from a single large university, selected as it aims to deliver a rigorous research-oriented medical curriculum, will be interviewed to understand how they use the available evidence in their education practices.Discussion  This study will lay the grounds to generate initial data into the determinants of knowledge use in a medical education context. In doing so, the findings will also inform the development of a larger, pan-Canadian study at medical schools that will generate a comprehensive account of the processes and challenges related to KT within an educational context. This larger study will also begin to explore the relevance of the Knowledge-to-Action model to a medical education context.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01853.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Clinical information transfer and data capture in the acute myocardial infarction pathway: an observational study</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01853.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clinical information transfer and data capture in the acute myocardial infarction pathway: an observational study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sujatha Kesavan, Tanika Kelay, Ruth E. Collins, Benita Cox, Fernando Bello, Roger L. Kneebone, Nick Sevdalis</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-15T19:45:19.794147-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01853.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01853.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01853.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Acute myocardial infarctions (MIs) or heart attacks are the result of a complete or an incomplete occlusion of the lumen of the coronary artery with a thrombus. Prompt diagnosis and early coronary intervention results in maximum myocardial salvage, hence time to treat is of the essence. Adequate, accurate and complete information is vital during the early stages of admission of an MI patient and can impact significantly on the quality and safety of patient care. This study aimed to record how clinical information between different clinical teams during the journey of a patient in the MI care pathway is captured and to review the flow of information within this care pathway.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A prospective, descriptive, structured observational study to assess (i) current clinical information systems (CIS) utilization and (ii) real-time information availability within an acute cardiac care setting was carried out. Completeness and availability of patient information capture across four key stages of the MI care pathway were assessed prospectively.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Thirteen separate information systems were utilized during the four phases of the MI pathway. Observations revealed fragmented CIS utilization, with users accessing an average of six systems to gain a complete set of patient information. Data capture was found to vary between each pathway stage and in both patient cohort risk groupings. The highest level of information completeness (100%) was observed only in the discharge stage of the MI care pathway. The lowest level of information completeness (58%) was observed in the admission stage.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The study highlights fragmentation, CIS duplication, and discrepancies in the current clinical information capture and data transfer across the MI care pathway in an acute cardiac care setting. The development of an integrated and user-friendly electronic data capture and transfer system would reduce duplication and would facilitate efficient and complete information provision at the point of care.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Acute myocardial infarctions (MIs) or heart attacks are the result of a complete or an incomplete occlusion of the lumen of the coronary artery with a thrombus. Prompt diagnosis and early coronary intervention results in maximum myocardial salvage, hence time to treat is of the essence. Adequate, accurate and complete information is vital during the early stages of admission of an MI patient and can impact significantly on the quality and safety of patient care. This study aimed to record how clinical information between different clinical teams during the journey of a patient in the MI care pathway is captured and to review the flow of information within this care pathway.Method  A prospective, descriptive, structured observational study to assess (i) current clinical information systems (CIS) utilization and (ii) real-time information availability within an acute cardiac care setting was carried out. Completeness and availability of patient information capture across four key stages of the MI care pathway were assessed prospectively.Results  Thirteen separate information systems were utilized during the four phases of the MI pathway. Observations revealed fragmented CIS utilization, with users accessing an average of six systems to gain a complete set of patient information. Data capture was found to vary between each pathway stage and in both patient cohort risk groupings. The highest level of information completeness (100%) was observed only in the discharge stage of the MI care pathway. The lowest level of information completeness (58%) was observed in the admission stage.Conclusion  The study highlights fragmentation, CIS duplication, and discrepancies in the current clinical information capture and data transfer across the MI care pathway in an acute cardiac care setting. The development of an integrated and user-friendly electronic data capture and transfer system would reduce duplication and would facilitate efficient and complete information provision at the point of care.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01850.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>How occupational health care professionals experience evidence-based guidelines in Finland: a qualitative study</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01850.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">How occupational health care professionals experience evidence-based guidelines in Finland: a qualitative study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maritta Kinnunen-Amoroso</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-15T19:45:17.958385-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01850.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01850.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01850.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aims and objectives </b> Evidence-based guidelines are currently the most relevant source of information in practice. The adherence to and use of guidelines is often influenced by attitudes towards the guidelines themselves, which have not been sufficiently explored in occupational health. This study examines the attitude of Finnish occupational nurses’ and doctors’ attitudes towards evidence-based guidelines.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Ten occupational doctors and eight occupational nurses were interviewed in Southern Finland on their attitudes towards evidence-based guidelines in 2009.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The nurses were not very familiar with the concept of evidence-based medicine. Rather, they used recommendations developed in their workplace or by their employer. The evidence base of these recommendations was not clear. The doctors considered the evidence-based guidelines reliable and practical, but did not always act according to them. Participants felt that they did not have time to check guidelines during their working hours. Participants wished for clearer, shorter guidelines on occupational health care topics, which would help in their practical daily work and clarify roles in teamwork.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Based on these positive attitudes, the use of guidelines may be more common than it seems. The viewpoints of all occupational health professional groups should be taken into account in guideline development, particularly on the availability and usability of the guidelines.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Aims and objectives  Evidence-based guidelines are currently the most relevant source of information in practice. The adherence to and use of guidelines is often influenced by attitudes towards the guidelines themselves, which have not been sufficiently explored in occupational health. This study examines the attitude of Finnish occupational nurses’ and doctors’ attitudes towards evidence-based guidelines.Methods  Ten occupational doctors and eight occupational nurses were interviewed in Southern Finland on their attitudes towards evidence-based guidelines in 2009.Results  The nurses were not very familiar with the concept of evidence-based medicine. Rather, they used recommendations developed in their workplace or by their employer. The evidence base of these recommendations was not clear. The doctors considered the evidence-based guidelines reliable and practical, but did not always act according to them. Participants felt that they did not have time to check guidelines during their working hours. Participants wished for clearer, shorter guidelines on occupational health care topics, which would help in their practical daily work and clarify roles in teamwork.Conclusions  Based on these positive attitudes, the use of guidelines may be more common than it seems. The viewpoints of all occupational health professional groups should be taken into account in guideline development, particularly on the availability and usability of the guidelines.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01852.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Guidelines adherence and hypertension control at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01852.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guidelines adherence and hypertension control at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nafees Ahmad, Yahaya Hassan, Balamurugan Tangiisuran, Ong Loke Meng, Noorizan Abd Aziz, Fiaz-ud-Din Ahmad, Muhammad Atif</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-14T23:03:51.399754-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01852.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01852.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01852.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Existing literature suggests that doctors' poor adherence with guidelines is one of the major contributing factors to suboptimal control of hypertension. This study aims to evaluate doctors' adherence with Malaysian clinical practice guideline (CPG 2008) in a tertiary care hospital, and factors associated with guideline adherence and hypertension control.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Hospital Pulau Pinang, Penang, Malaysia. Prescriptions written by 26 enrolled doctors to 650 established hypertensive outpatients (25 prescriptions per enrolled doctor) were noted on visit 1 along with patients' demographic and clinical data. The noted prescriptions were classified either as compliant or non-compliant to CPG (2008). Five hundred twenty (80%) of the enrolled patients (20 patients per enrolled doctor) were followed for one more visit. Blood pressure (BP) noted on visit 2 was related to the prescription written on visit 1. SPSS 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Three hundred forty-nine (67.1%) patients received guidelines compliant pharmacotherapy. In multivariate analysis, hypertension clinic had significant negative association with guidelines adherence. Two hundred sixty-five patients (51%) were at goal BP on visit 2. In multivariate analysis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and guidelines adherence had significant positive, while renal disease, diabetes mellitus and diabetic clinic had significant negative association with hypertension control.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> An overall fair level of adherence with guidelines and better control of hypertension was observed. Guidelines compliant practices resulted in better control of hypertension. The gaps between what guidelines recommend and clinical practice were especially seen in the pharmacotherapy of uncomplicated hypertension and hypertension with diabetes mellitus and renal disease.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Existing literature suggests that doctors' poor adherence with guidelines is one of the major contributing factors to suboptimal control of hypertension. This study aims to evaluate doctors' adherence with Malaysian clinical practice guideline (CPG 2008) in a tertiary care hospital, and factors associated with guideline adherence and hypertension control.Methods  This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Hospital Pulau Pinang, Penang, Malaysia. Prescriptions written by 26 enrolled doctors to 650 established hypertensive outpatients (25 prescriptions per enrolled doctor) were noted on visit 1 along with patients' demographic and clinical data. The noted prescriptions were classified either as compliant or non-compliant to CPG (2008). Five hundred twenty (80%) of the enrolled patients (20 patients per enrolled doctor) were followed for one more visit. Blood pressure (BP) noted on visit 2 was related to the prescription written on visit 1. SPSS 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.Results  Three hundred forty-nine (67.1%) patients received guidelines compliant pharmacotherapy. In multivariate analysis, hypertension clinic had significant negative association with guidelines adherence. Two hundred sixty-five patients (51%) were at goal BP on visit 2. In multivariate analysis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and guidelines adherence had significant positive, while renal disease, diabetes mellitus and diabetic clinic had significant negative association with hypertension control.Conclusions  An overall fair level of adherence with guidelines and better control of hypertension was observed. Guidelines compliant practices resulted in better control of hypertension. The gaps between what guidelines recommend and clinical practice were especially seen in the pharmacotherapy of uncomplicated hypertension and hypertension with diabetes mellitus and renal disease.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01851.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The effectiveness of adhering to clinical-practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: the results of a cohort study in the Netherlands</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01851.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The effectiveness of adhering to clinical-practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: the results of a cohort study in the Netherlands</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maarten K. van Dijk, Desiree B. Oosterbaan, Marc J. P. M. Verbraak, Anton J. L. M. van Balkom</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-14T23:02:32.21149-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01851.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01851.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01851.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> While studies into the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for mental health care are scarce, studies on the effectiveness of implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders appear to be entirely non-existent.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> To examine whether adherence to anxiety disorder clinical practice guidelines in secondary mental health care yields superior treatment results than non-adherence.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A closed-cohort study of 181 outpatients with an anxiety disorder or hypochondriasis who were treated in a routine mental health setting. Preceding the inclusion of these 181 patients, a start was made on the implementation of the Dutch national multidisciplinary practice guidelines for anxiety disorders. Patients were asked to complete several questionnaires before the start of treatment and again 1 year later. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to assess guideline adherence. Ultimately, adherence or non-adherence to the different treatment algorithms described in the guidelines was related to changes in the severity of psychiatric symptomatology, psychiatric functioning, general well-being and satisfaction with treatment.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Compared with patients whose treatment did not adhere to the guidelines, those whose treatment adhered to the guidelines were found to have greater symptom reduction after 1 year (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The latter group of patients also rated their satisfaction with their treatment significantly higher (<em>P</em> = 0.01). No significant differences were found after 1 year with respect to changes in impairment of functioning and quality of life in the two groups of patients.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Adherence to anxiety disorder guidelines yields superior treatment results and increased patient satisfaction with treatment when compared with patients whose treatment did not adhere to the clinical guidelines. These results should encourage a more widespread implementation of such guidelines in mental health care facilities.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Background  While studies into the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for mental health care are scarce, studies on the effectiveness of implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders appear to be entirely non-existent.Objective  To examine whether adherence to anxiety disorder clinical practice guidelines in secondary mental health care yields superior treatment results than non-adherence.Method  A closed-cohort study of 181 outpatients with an anxiety disorder or hypochondriasis who were treated in a routine mental health setting. Preceding the inclusion of these 181 patients, a start was made on the implementation of the Dutch national multidisciplinary practice guidelines for anxiety disorders. Patients were asked to complete several questionnaires before the start of treatment and again 1 year later. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to assess guideline adherence. Ultimately, adherence or non-adherence to the different treatment algorithms described in the guidelines was related to changes in the severity of psychiatric symptomatology, psychiatric functioning, general well-being and satisfaction with treatment.Results  Compared with patients whose treatment did not adhere to the guidelines, those whose treatment adhered to the guidelines were found to have greater symptom reduction after 1 year (P &lt; 0.01). The latter group of patients also rated their satisfaction with their treatment significantly higher (P = 0.01). No significant differences were found after 1 year with respect to changes in impairment of functioning and quality of life in the two groups of patients.Conclusions  Adherence to anxiety disorder guidelines yields superior treatment results and increased patient satisfaction with treatment when compared with patients whose treatment did not adhere to the clinical guidelines. These results should encourage a more widespread implementation of such guidelines in mental health care facilities.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01849.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Research evidence uptake in a developing country: a survey of attitudes, education and self-efficacy, engagement, and barriers among physical therapists in the Philippines</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01849.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Research evidence uptake in a developing country: a survey of attitudes, education and self-efficacy, engagement, and barriers among physical therapists in the Philippines</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edward James R. Gorgon, Hazel Gaile T. Barrozo, Laarni G. Mariano, Emmalou F. Rivera</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-14T23:02:20.50608-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01849.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01849.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01849.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale and objective </b> Use of evidence from systematic research is critical in evidence-based physical therapy, yet this has not been described well in developing countries where its purported benefits are most needed. This study explored research evidence uptake among physical therapists in the Philippines.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A probability survey of practitioners in tertiary hospitals in the Philippines' National Capital Region was conducted.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Of the 188 questionnaires distributed, 152 were returned for an 81% response rate. Positive attitudes were consistently reported (78–93%), although education and self-efficacy related to key dimensions such as searching, appraising and integrating evidence were varied (53–82%). Less than 50% reported using research evidence routinely in five of six dimensions of clinical practice, except in selecting treatments (53%). Textbooks, own observations and expert opinion were consistently relied upon (74–96%) while average-month approximations of engagement in relevant activities such as searching, reading, appraising and applying research literature were low (10–18%). Participants faced a number of barriers such as lack of time, resources, skills, access to research literature, supporting administrative policies, in-service training and authority in decision making.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The low research evidence uptake and heavy reliance on potentially biased evidence sources strongly indicate the need for effective professional education for practitioners to address current barriers as well as early intensive undergraduate education for students to ensure adequate preparation on being effective research evidence consumers. Given the profile of Filipino physical therapists, alternatives to ‘from scratch’ evidence searching and appraisal are required if widespread uptake is envisaged.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale and objective  Use of evidence from systematic research is critical in evidence-based physical therapy, yet this has not been described well in developing countries where its purported benefits are most needed. This study explored research evidence uptake among physical therapists in the Philippines.Method  A probability survey of practitioners in tertiary hospitals in the Philippines' National Capital Region was conducted.Results  Of the 188 questionnaires distributed, 152 were returned for an 81% response rate. Positive attitudes were consistently reported (78–93%), although education and self-efficacy related to key dimensions such as searching, appraising and integrating evidence were varied (53–82%). Less than 50% reported using research evidence routinely in five of six dimensions of clinical practice, except in selecting treatments (53%). Textbooks, own observations and expert opinion were consistently relied upon (74–96%) while average-month approximations of engagement in relevant activities such as searching, reading, appraising and applying research literature were low (10–18%). Participants faced a number of barriers such as lack of time, resources, skills, access to research literature, supporting administrative policies, in-service training and authority in decision making.Conclusions  The low research evidence uptake and heavy reliance on potentially biased evidence sources strongly indicate the need for effective professional education for practitioners to address current barriers as well as early intensive undergraduate education for students to ensure adequate preparation on being effective research evidence consumers. Given the profile of Filipino physical therapists, alternatives to ‘from scratch’ evidence searching and appraisal are required if widespread uptake is envisaged.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01857.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The influence of clinical evidence on surgical practice</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01857.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The influence of clinical evidence on surgical practice</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">S. Honeybul, K. M. Ho</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-08T20:01:04.434615-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01857.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01857.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01857.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Given the considerable interest in the use of evidence-based medicine to guide clinical practice, it is surprising that the results of a recent randomized controlled trial have been met with such a limited response. The DECompressive CRAniectomy study investigators have recently published the results of a landmark trial in neurosurgery, comparing early decompressive craniectomy with standard medical therapy in patients who developed intracranial hypertension after diffuse closed traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is the first ever randomized controlled trial investigating the surgical management of adult patients with severe TBI. The trial clearly demonstrated that early decompression did not provide clinical benefit; however, rather than having a significant impact on clinical practice, it has been almost uniformly criticized. While there were some problems with randomization and crossover, we feel that the trial has been somewhat misinterpreted and in this article we address some of the key issues.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Given the considerable interest in the use of evidence-based medicine to guide clinical practice, it is surprising that the results of a recent randomized controlled trial have been met with such a limited response. The DECompressive CRAniectomy study investigators have recently published the results of a landmark trial in neurosurgery, comparing early decompressive craniectomy with standard medical therapy in patients who developed intracranial hypertension after diffuse closed traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is the first ever randomized controlled trial investigating the surgical management of adult patients with severe TBI. The trial clearly demonstrated that early decompression did not provide clinical benefit; however, rather than having a significant impact on clinical practice, it has been almost uniformly criticized. While there were some problems with randomization and crossover, we feel that the trial has been somewhat misinterpreted and in this article we address some of the key issues.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01856.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome in an outpatient setting: good guideline adherence in Swiss primary care</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01856.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome in an outpatient setting: good guideline adherence in Swiss primary care</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Tandjung, Oliver Senn, Thomas Rosemann, Monika Loy</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-08T20:00:29.947854-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01856.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01856.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01856.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Switzerland lacks of national guidelines for the initial treatment of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS is not as frequent in an outpatient setting as in an emergency department; nevertheless, missing an ACS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We wanted to observe actual infrastructure and performance based on case vignettes in outpatient general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists (CAs); as a second outcome, we wanted to compare GPs to CAs.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> We conducted a postal vignette-based survey to investigate the management of outpatients presenting with acute chest pain by doctors in private practice. The use of troponin and cardiac stress testing for the evaluation of acute chest pain as well as referral practice and use of antiplatelet agents were assessed and compared between GPs and CAs.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> There were 507 of the 571 respondents (response rate 39.7%) who were CAs (36) or GPs (471) and were included in the analysis. Whereas all CAs were equipped with electrocardiogram (ECG), cardiac stress testing and troponin assays, the majority of GPs had an ECG (97.8%) and applied troponin testing (76.3%), and 38.7% performed cardiac stress testing. The vast majority responded to directly refer a STEMI to the next catheter lab (87.7%), or in the case of a troponin-positive NSTEMI, to an inpatient ward (94.1%) with no difference between GPs and CAs. A majority of the GPs responded to use antiplatelet agents in the case of a STEMI (89.6%) and reported further workup with cardiac stress testing in the case of a troponin-negative acute chest pain (78.7%), which was lower compared to CAs who applied antiplatelet agents and cardiac stress testing in 100% and 97.0%.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> We could show that international guideline adherence in ACS of GPs is high and GPs perform as well as CAs. Nevertheless there is room for optimization in the antiplatelet therapy and the use of cardiac stress testing in a low-risk population. National guidelines for treatment of an ACS in an outpatient setting are indicated.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Background  Switzerland lacks of national guidelines for the initial treatment of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS is not as frequent in an outpatient setting as in an emergency department; nevertheless, missing an ACS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We wanted to observe actual infrastructure and performance based on case vignettes in outpatient general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists (CAs); as a second outcome, we wanted to compare GPs to CAs.Methods  We conducted a postal vignette-based survey to investigate the management of outpatients presenting with acute chest pain by doctors in private practice. The use of troponin and cardiac stress testing for the evaluation of acute chest pain as well as referral practice and use of antiplatelet agents were assessed and compared between GPs and CAs.Results  There were 507 of the 571 respondents (response rate 39.7%) who were CAs (36) or GPs (471) and were included in the analysis. Whereas all CAs were equipped with electrocardiogram (ECG), cardiac stress testing and troponin assays, the majority of GPs had an ECG (97.8%) and applied troponin testing (76.3%), and 38.7% performed cardiac stress testing. The vast majority responded to directly refer a STEMI to the next catheter lab (87.7%), or in the case of a troponin-positive NSTEMI, to an inpatient ward (94.1%) with no difference between GPs and CAs. A majority of the GPs responded to use antiplatelet agents in the case of a STEMI (89.6%) and reported further workup with cardiac stress testing in the case of a troponin-negative acute chest pain (78.7%), which was lower compared to CAs who applied antiplatelet agents and cardiac stress testing in 100% and 97.0%.Conclusions  We could show that international guideline adherence in ACS of GPs is high and GPs perform as well as CAs. Nevertheless there is room for optimization in the antiplatelet therapy and the use of cardiac stress testing in a low-risk population. National guidelines for treatment of an ACS in an outpatient setting are indicated.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01855.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Analysis of scientific truth status in controlled rehabilitation trials</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01855.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Analysis of scientific truth status in controlled rehabilitation trials</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roger Kerry, Aurélien Madouasse, Antony Arthur, Stephen D. Mumford</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-08T20:00:26.660822-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01855.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01855.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01855.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical guidelines (reviews) are intended to inform clinical practice, and in this sense can be thought of as scientific truthmakers. High-quality controlled trials should align to this truth, and method quality markers should predict truth status. We sought to determine in what way controlled trial quality relates to scientific truth, and to determine predictive utility of trial quality and bibliographic markers.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A sample of reviews in rehabilitation medicine was examined. Two scientific truth dimensions were established based on review outcomes. Quality and bibliographic markers were extracted from associated trials for use in a regression analysis of their predictive utility for trial truth status. Probability analysis was undertaken to examine judgments of future trial truth status.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Of the 93 trials included in contemporaneous reviews, overall, <em>n</em> = 45 (48%) were true. <em>Randomization</em> was found more in true trials than false trials in one truth dimension (<em>P</em> = 0.03). <em>Intention-to-treat analysis</em> was close to significant in one truth dimension (<em>P</em> = 0.058), being more commonly used in false trials. There were no other significant differences in quality or bibliographic variables between true and false trials. Regression analysis revealed no significant predictors of trial truth status. Probability analysis reported that the reasonable chance of future trials being true was between 2 and 5%, based on a uniform prior.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The findings are at odds with what is considered gold-standard research methods, but in line with previous reports. Further work should focus on scientific dynamics within healthcare research and evidence-based practice constructs.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical guidelines (reviews) are intended to inform clinical practice, and in this sense can be thought of as scientific truthmakers. High-quality controlled trials should align to this truth, and method quality markers should predict truth status. We sought to determine in what way controlled trial quality relates to scientific truth, and to determine predictive utility of trial quality and bibliographic markers.Method  A sample of reviews in rehabilitation medicine was examined. Two scientific truth dimensions were established based on review outcomes. Quality and bibliographic markers were extracted from associated trials for use in a regression analysis of their predictive utility for trial truth status. Probability analysis was undertaken to examine judgments of future trial truth status.Results  Of the 93 trials included in contemporaneous reviews, overall, n = 45 (48%) were true. Randomization was found more in true trials than false trials in one truth dimension (P = 0.03). Intention-to-treat analysis was close to significant in one truth dimension (P = 0.058), being more commonly used in false trials. There were no other significant differences in quality or bibliographic variables between true and false trials. Regression analysis revealed no significant predictors of trial truth status. Probability analysis reported that the reasonable chance of future trials being true was between 2 and 5%, based on a uniform prior.Conclusions  The findings are at odds with what is considered gold-standard research methods, but in line with previous reports. Further work should focus on scientific dynamics within healthcare research and evidence-based practice constructs.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01847.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Adherence to the Australian National Inpatient Medication Chart: the efficacy of a uniform national drug chart on improving prescription error</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01847.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adherence to the Australian National Inpatient Medication Chart: the efficacy of a uniform national drug chart on improving prescription error</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alp Atik</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-05-08T20:00:22.452754-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01847.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01847.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01847.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> In 2006, the National Inpatient Medication Chart (NIMC) was introduced as a uniform medication chart in Australian public hospitals with the aim of reducing prescription error.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Purpose </b> The rate of regular medication prescription error in the NIMC was assessed.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Data was collected using the NIMC Audit Tool and analyzed with respect to causes of error per medication prescription and per medication chart. The following prescription requirements were assessed: date, generic drug name, route of administration, dose, frequency, administration time, indication, signature, name and contact details.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Findings </b> A total of 1877 medication prescriptions were reviewed. 1653 prescriptions (88.07%) had no contact number, 1630 (86.84%) did not have an indication, 1230 and 675 (35.96%) used a drug's trade name. Within 261 medication charts, all had at least one entry, which did not include an indication, 258 (98.85%) had at least one entry, which did not have a contact number and 200 (76.63%) had at least one entry, which used a trade name.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Discussion </b> The introduction of a uniform national medication chart is a positive step, but more needs to be done to address the root causes of prescription error.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Background  In 2006, the National Inpatient Medication Chart (NIMC) was introduced as a uniform medication chart in Australian public hospitals with the aim of reducing prescription error.Purpose  The rate of regular medication prescription error in the NIMC was assessed.Methods  Data was collected using the NIMC Audit Tool and analyzed with respect to causes of error per medication prescription and per medication chart. The following prescription requirements were assessed: date, generic drug name, route of administration, dose, frequency, administration time, indication, signature, name and contact details.Findings  A total of 1877 medication prescriptions were reviewed. 1653 prescriptions (88.07%) had no contact number, 1630 (86.84%) did not have an indication, 1230 and 675 (35.96%) used a drug's trade name. Within 261 medication charts, all had at least one entry, which did not include an indication, 258 (98.85%) had at least one entry, which did not have a contact number and 200 (76.63%) had at least one entry, which used a trade name.Discussion  The introduction of a uniform national medication chart is a positive step, but more needs to be done to address the root causes of prescription error.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01835.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>How to define ‘best practice’ for use in Knowledge Translation research: a practical, stepped and interactive process</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01835.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">How to define ‘best practice’ for use in Knowledge Translation research: a practical, stepped and interactive process</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marije Bosch, Emma Tavender, Peter Bragge, Russell Gruen, Sally Green</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-04-09T20:02:02.540496-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01835.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01835.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01835.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> Defining ‘best practice’ is one of the first and crucial steps in any Knowledge Translation (KT) research project. Without a sound understanding of what exactly should happen in practice, it is impossible to measure the extent of existing gaps between ‘desired’ and ‘actual’ care, set implementation goals, and monitor performance. The aim of this paper is to present a practical, stepped and interactive process to develop best practice recommendations that are actionable, locally applicable and in line with the best available research-based evidence, with a view to adapt these into process measures (quality indicators) for KT research purposes.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Our process encompasses the following steps: (1) identify current, high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and extract recommendations; (2) select strong recommendations in key clinical management areas; (3) update evidence and create evidence overviews; (4) discuss evidence and produce agreed ‘evidence statements’; (5) discuss the relevance of the evidence with local stakeholders; and (6) develop locally applicable actionable best practice recommendations, suitable for use as the basis of quality indicators.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Actionable definitions of local best practice are a prerequisite for doing KT research. As substantial resources go into rigorously synthesizing evidence and developing CPGs, it is important to make best use of such available resources. We developed a process for efficiently developing locally applicable actionable best practice recommendations from existing high-quality CPGs that are in line with current research evidence.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Objectives  Defining ‘best practice’ is one of the first and crucial steps in any Knowledge Translation (KT) research project. Without a sound understanding of what exactly should happen in practice, it is impossible to measure the extent of existing gaps between ‘desired’ and ‘actual’ care, set implementation goals, and monitor performance. The aim of this paper is to present a practical, stepped and interactive process to develop best practice recommendations that are actionable, locally applicable and in line with the best available research-based evidence, with a view to adapt these into process measures (quality indicators) for KT research purposes.Methods  Our process encompasses the following steps: (1) identify current, high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and extract recommendations; (2) select strong recommendations in key clinical management areas; (3) update evidence and create evidence overviews; (4) discuss evidence and produce agreed ‘evidence statements’; (5) discuss the relevance of the evidence with local stakeholders; and (6) develop locally applicable actionable best practice recommendations, suitable for use as the basis of quality indicators.Conclusions  Actionable definitions of local best practice are a prerequisite for doing KT research. As substantial resources go into rigorously synthesizing evidence and developing CPGs, it is important to make best use of such available resources. We developed a process for efficiently developing locally applicable actionable best practice recommendations from existing high-quality CPGs that are in line with current research evidence.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01817.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of chronic care management for diabetes: investigating heterogeneity in outcomes</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01817.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of chronic care management for diabetes: investigating heterogeneity in outcomes</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arianne M.J. Elissen, Lotte M.G. Steuten, Lidwien C. Lemmens, Hanneke W. Drewes, Karin M.M. Lemmens, Jolanda A.C. Meeuwissen, Caroline A. Baan, Hubertus J.M. Vrijhoef</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-29T01:37:41.392756-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01817.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01817.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01817.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Purpose </b> The study aims to support decision making on how best to redesign diabetes care by investigating three potential sources of heterogeneity in effectiveness across trials of diabetes care management.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Medline, CINAHL and PsycInfo were searched for systematic reviews and empirical studies focusing on: (1) diabetes mellitus; (2) adult patients; and (3) interventions consisting of at least two components of the chronic care model (CCM). Systematic reviews were analysed descriptively; empirical studies were meta-analysed. Pooled effect measures were estimated using a meta-regression model that incorporated study quality, length of follow-up and number of intervention components as potential predictors of heterogeneity in effects.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Overall, reviews (<em>n</em> = 15) of diabetes care programmes report modest improvements in glycaemic control. Empirical studies (<em>n</em> = 61) show wide-ranging results on HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and guideline adherence. Differences between studies in methodological quality cannot explain this heterogeneity in effects. Variety in length of follow-up can explain (part of) the variability, yet not across all outcomes. Diversity in the number of included intervention components can explain 8–12% of the heterogeneity in effects on HbA1c and systolic blood pressure.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The outcomes of chronic care management for diabetes are generally positive, yet differ considerably across trials. The most promising results are attained in studies with limited follow-up (&lt;1 year) and by programmes including more than two CCM components. These factors can, however, explain only part of the heterogeneity in effectiveness between studies. Other potential sources of heterogeneity should be investigated to ensure implementation of evidence-based improvements in diabetes care.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Purpose  The study aims to support decision making on how best to redesign diabetes care by investigating three potential sources of heterogeneity in effectiveness across trials of diabetes care management.Methods  Medline, CINAHL and PsycInfo were searched for systematic reviews and empirical studies focusing on: (1) diabetes mellitus; (2) adult patients; and (3) interventions consisting of at least two components of the chronic care model (CCM). Systematic reviews were analysed descriptively; empirical studies were meta-analysed. Pooled effect measures were estimated using a meta-regression model that incorporated study quality, length of follow-up and number of intervention components as potential predictors of heterogeneity in effects.Results  Overall, reviews (n = 15) of diabetes care programmes report modest improvements in glycaemic control. Empirical studies (n = 61) show wide-ranging results on HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and guideline adherence. Differences between studies in methodological quality cannot explain this heterogeneity in effects. Variety in length of follow-up can explain (part of) the variability, yet not across all outcomes. Diversity in the number of included intervention components can explain 8–12% of the heterogeneity in effects on HbA1c and systolic blood pressure.Conclusions  The outcomes of chronic care management for diabetes are generally positive, yet differ considerably across trials. The most promising results are attained in studies with limited follow-up (&lt;1 year) and by programmes including more than two CCM components. These factors can, however, explain only part of the heterogeneity in effectiveness between studies. Other potential sources of heterogeneity should be investigated to ensure implementation of evidence-based improvements in diabetes care.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01828.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effect of continuous education for evidence-based medicine practice on knowledge, attitudes and skills of medical students</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01828.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effect of continuous education for evidence-based medicine practice on knowledge, attitudes and skills of medical students</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Thanitha Sirirak, Sathana Boonyapipat, Panumad Pornsawat</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-23T20:15:43.211533-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01828.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01828.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01828.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> To assess the effect of the integration of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in a medical curriculum using small-group discussions with case scenario and problem-based learning on the knowledge, attitudes and skills of medical students.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a medical school in southern Thailand during 2008–2009. EBM practice was begun before the completion of the fourth year using case scenario and continued through the fifth year using learner-centred, problem-based self-practice. Knowledge improvement was measured by summative assessment using pre- and post-tests after small-group discussions with a case scenario. Attitudes and skills were measured by self-rating assessments: before initiation of the course (T0) and after the course at week 1, 5, 13, 25 and 37 (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5), respectively. Data were analyzed using paired <em>t</em>-test and linear mixed-effects model fitted by maximum likelihood.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> One hundred fourteen students took the course, with a mean age of 22.1 years. Before and after knowledge scores showed a significant improvement (4.93 versus 7.43). The proportion of students who achieved the highest knowledge scores was higher (4% at pre-test versus 54% at post-test). Both self-rated attitudes and skills after EBM practice increased dramatically from the initiation of the course (T0; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Compared with T1, significantly lower scores of attitudes and skills were observed at T2 and T3, but both were higher at T4 assessment.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Continuous EBM education through small-group discussion and learner-centred, problem-based self-practice can be a useful way to improve a medical student's knowledge, attitudes and skills.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Objective  To assess the effect of the integration of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in a medical curriculum using small-group discussions with case scenario and problem-based learning on the knowledge, attitudes and skills of medical students.Method  A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a medical school in southern Thailand during 2008–2009. EBM practice was begun before the completion of the fourth year using case scenario and continued through the fifth year using learner-centred, problem-based self-practice. Knowledge improvement was measured by summative assessment using pre- and post-tests after small-group discussions with a case scenario. Attitudes and skills were measured by self-rating assessments: before initiation of the course (T0) and after the course at week 1, 5, 13, 25 and 37 (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5), respectively. Data were analyzed using paired t-test and linear mixed-effects model fitted by maximum likelihood.Results  One hundred fourteen students took the course, with a mean age of 22.1 years. Before and after knowledge scores showed a significant improvement (4.93 versus 7.43). The proportion of students who achieved the highest knowledge scores was higher (4% at pre-test versus 54% at post-test). Both self-rated attitudes and skills after EBM practice increased dramatically from the initiation of the course (T0; P &lt; 0.001). Compared with T1, significantly lower scores of attitudes and skills were observed at T2 and T3, but both were higher at T4 assessment.Conclusions  Continuous EBM education through small-group discussion and learner-centred, problem-based self-practice can be a useful way to improve a medical student's knowledge, attitudes and skills.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01807.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Bridging evidence and consensus methodology for inherited metabolic disorders: creating nutrition guidelines</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01807.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bridging evidence and consensus methodology for inherited metabolic disorders: creating nutrition guidelines</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rani H. Singh, Fran Rohr, Patricia L. Splett</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-13T20:04:01.439433-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01807.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01807.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01807.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> The management of many inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) is dependent on nutrition intervention, but few clinical management guidelines for these uncommon disorders exist. Clinicians are forced to make nutrition treatment decisions using limited data. This results in clinical variations in both service and cost. We describe a method for establishing management guidelines to help clinicians treat patients with IMDs.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> The Southeast Newborn Screening and Genetics Collaborative (Region 3) convened a group of nine national experts in metabolic nutrition to determine the pertinent issues in the development of nutrition management guidelines for IMDs. These experts were trained in evidence analysis and examined established consensus techniques for guideline development.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The workgroup developed a multi-step process for guideline development known as the Delphi-Nominal Group-Delphi-Field Testing methodology, which includes a review of scientific and grey (unpublished) literature, a Delphi survey of practice, a nominal group meeting to clarify discrepancies, a formulation of recommendations and a second Delphi round to assess the degree of consensus with the proposed recommendations. External review and field testing are also built into the process.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The evidence- and consensus-based method suggested for the development of nutrition management guidelines for IMDs will result in the production of consistent and accessible guidelines that can be created in a timely and cost-effective manner and offer a validated methodology to develop management guidelines for this field to optimize outcomes.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  The management of many inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) is dependent on nutrition intervention, but few clinical management guidelines for these uncommon disorders exist. Clinicians are forced to make nutrition treatment decisions using limited data. This results in clinical variations in both service and cost. We describe a method for establishing management guidelines to help clinicians treat patients with IMDs.Methods  The Southeast Newborn Screening and Genetics Collaborative (Region 3) convened a group of nine national experts in metabolic nutrition to determine the pertinent issues in the development of nutrition management guidelines for IMDs. These experts were trained in evidence analysis and examined established consensus techniques for guideline development.Results  The workgroup developed a multi-step process for guideline development known as the Delphi-Nominal Group-Delphi-Field Testing methodology, which includes a review of scientific and grey (unpublished) literature, a Delphi survey of practice, a nominal group meeting to clarify discrepancies, a formulation of recommendations and a second Delphi round to assess the degree of consensus with the proposed recommendations. External review and field testing are also built into the process.Conclusion  The evidence- and consensus-based method suggested for the development of nutrition management guidelines for IMDs will result in the production of consistent and accessible guidelines that can be created in a timely and cost-effective manner and offer a validated methodology to develop management guidelines for this field to optimize outcomes.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01805.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Chronic care management for patients with COPD: a critical review of available evidence</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01805.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chronic care management for patients with COPD: a critical review of available evidence</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karin M. M. Lemmens, Lidwien C. Lemmens, José H. C. Boom, Hanneke W. Drewes, Jolanda A. C. Meeuwissen, Lotte M. G. Steuten, Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef, Caroline A. Baan</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-02T05:09:35.891506-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01805.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01805.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01805.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Clinical diversity and methodological heterogeneity exists between studies on chronic care management. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of chronic care management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) while taking heterogeneity into account, enabling the understanding of and the decision making about such programmes. Three investigated sources of heterogeneity were study quality, length of follow-up, and number of intervention components.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> We performed a review of previously published reviews and meta-analyses on COPD chronic care management. Their primary studies that were analyzed as statistical, clinical and methodological heterogeneity were present. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explain the variances among the primary studies.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Generally, the included reviews showed positive results on quality of life and hospitalizations. Inconclusive effects were found on emergency department visits and no effects on mortality. Pooled effects on hospitalizations, emergency department visits and quality of life of primary studies did not reach significant improvement. No effects were found on mortality. Meta-regression showed that the number of components of chronic care management programmes explained present heterogeneity for hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Four components showed significant effects on hospitalizations, whereas two components had significant effects on emergency department visits. Methodological study quality and length of follow-up did not significantly explain heterogeneity.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> This study demonstrated that COPD chronic care management has the potential to improve outcomes of care; heterogeneity in outcomes was explained. Further research is needed to elucidate the diversity between COPD chronic care management studies in terms of the effects measured and strengthen the support for chronic care management.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Clinical diversity and methodological heterogeneity exists between studies on chronic care management. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of chronic care management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) while taking heterogeneity into account, enabling the understanding of and the decision making about such programmes. Three investigated sources of heterogeneity were study quality, length of follow-up, and number of intervention components.Methods  We performed a review of previously published reviews and meta-analyses on COPD chronic care management. Their primary studies that were analyzed as statistical, clinical and methodological heterogeneity were present. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explain the variances among the primary studies.Results  Generally, the included reviews showed positive results on quality of life and hospitalizations. Inconclusive effects were found on emergency department visits and no effects on mortality. Pooled effects on hospitalizations, emergency department visits and quality of life of primary studies did not reach significant improvement. No effects were found on mortality. Meta-regression showed that the number of components of chronic care management programmes explained present heterogeneity for hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Four components showed significant effects on hospitalizations, whereas two components had significant effects on emergency department visits. Methodological study quality and length of follow-up did not significantly explain heterogeneity.Conclusions  This study demonstrated that COPD chronic care management has the potential to improve outcomes of care; heterogeneity in outcomes was explained. Further research is needed to elucidate the diversity between COPD chronic care management studies in terms of the effects measured and strengthen the support for chronic care management.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01811.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Attitude, knowledge and behaviour towards evidence-based medicine of physical therapists, students, teachers and supervisors in the Netherlands: a survey</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01811.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Attitude, knowledge and behaviour towards evidence-based medicine of physical therapists, students, teachers and supervisors in the Netherlands: a survey</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gwendolijne G. M. Scholten-Peeters, Monique S. Beekman-Evers, Annemiek C. J. W. van Boxel, Sjanna van Hemert, Winifred D. Paulis, Johannes C. van der Wouden, Arianne P. Verhagen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-29T20:49:04.542043-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01811.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01811.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01811.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has gained widespread acceptance in physical therapy. However, because little is known about the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of physical therapists towards EBM, and their participation in research to generate EBM, we explored these aspects among physical therapy students, teachers, supervisors and practising physical therapists.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> This is a cross-sectional survey in which participants completed a web-based questionnaire to determine their attitudes, knowledge and behaviour regarding EBM, and their participation in research.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Questionnaires were sent to 814 participants of which 165 were returned. The overall mean score for attitude was 4.3 [standard deviation (SD) 1.0; range 1–7], which indicates a weak positive attitude. Teachers scored the highest (4.9, SD 1.2) and students the lowest (4.1, SD 0.8). Although most participants had some understanding of the technical terms used in EBM, only teachers felt able to explain these terms to others. Of the students, 45% rated their perceived EBM knowledge as bad and 45% as average, whereas 78% of the teachers considered that they had good knowledge. To answer clinical questions, most students generally use textbooks (96%) and the opinion of their supervisors (87.7%).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> There is a weak positive attitude of physical therapists, teachers, supervisors and students towards participating in research in general practice, but there is a lack of knowledge and active behaviour regarding EBM, especially among physical therapy students.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has gained widespread acceptance in physical therapy. However, because little is known about the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of physical therapists towards EBM, and their participation in research to generate EBM, we explored these aspects among physical therapy students, teachers, supervisors and practising physical therapists.Methods  This is a cross-sectional survey in which participants completed a web-based questionnaire to determine their attitudes, knowledge and behaviour regarding EBM, and their participation in research.Results  Questionnaires were sent to 814 participants of which 165 were returned. The overall mean score for attitude was 4.3 [standard deviation (SD) 1.0; range 1–7], which indicates a weak positive attitude. Teachers scored the highest (4.9, SD 1.2) and students the lowest (4.1, SD 0.8). Although most participants had some understanding of the technical terms used in EBM, only teachers felt able to explain these terms to others. Of the students, 45% rated their perceived EBM knowledge as bad and 45% as average, whereas 78% of the teachers considered that they had good knowledge. To answer clinical questions, most students generally use textbooks (96%) and the opinion of their supervisors (87.7%).Conclusions  There is a weak positive attitude of physical therapists, teachers, supervisors and students towards participating in research in general practice, but there is a lack of knowledge and active behaviour regarding EBM, especially among physical therapy students.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01810.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Barriers to and enablers of evidence-based practice in perinatal care in the SEA-ORCHID project</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01810.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barriers to and enablers of evidence-based practice in perinatal care in the SEA-ORCHID project</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tari Turner, Jacki Short, </dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-29T20:47:41.155479-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01810.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01810.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01810.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> The South-East Asia Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries (SEA-ORCHID) project aimed to improve health outcomes for mothers and babies in nine hospitals in South-East Asia by supporting evidence-based perinatal health care. In this research, we aimed to identify and explore the factors that may have acted as barriers to or enablers of evidence-based practice change at each of the hospitals.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> During the final 6 months of the intervention phase of the project, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were undertaken with 179 nurses, midwives and doctors from the maternal and neonatal departments at each of the nine participating South-East Asian hospitals.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The interviews identified several factors that participants believed had a substantial impact on the effectiveness of the SEA-ORCHID intervention. These included knowledge, skills, hierarchy, multidisciplinarity and leadership, beliefs about consequences, resources, and the nature of the behaviours. The success of the SEA-ORCHID intervention in improving practice may reflect the extent to which tailored strategies were effective in overcoming these barriers.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Effective interventions to align practice with evidence rely on identifying and addressing barriers to practice change. The barriers identified in this study may be useful for those designing similar clinical practice improvement projects, as well as for continued efforts to improve practice in the SEA-ORCHID hospitals.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale, aims and objectives  The South-East Asia Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries (SEA-ORCHID) project aimed to improve health outcomes for mothers and babies in nine hospitals in South-East Asia by supporting evidence-based perinatal health care. In this research, we aimed to identify and explore the factors that may have acted as barriers to or enablers of evidence-based practice change at each of the hospitals.Methods  During the final 6 months of the intervention phase of the project, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were undertaken with 179 nurses, midwives and doctors from the maternal and neonatal departments at each of the nine participating South-East Asian hospitals.Results  The interviews identified several factors that participants believed had a substantial impact on the effectiveness of the SEA-ORCHID intervention. These included knowledge, skills, hierarchy, multidisciplinarity and leadership, beliefs about consequences, resources, and the nature of the behaviours. The success of the SEA-ORCHID intervention in improving practice may reflect the extent to which tailored strategies were effective in overcoming these barriers.Conclusion  Effective interventions to align practice with evidence rely on identifying and addressing barriers to practice change. The barriers identified in this study may be useful for those designing similar clinical practice improvement projects, as well as for continued efforts to improve practice in the SEA-ORCHID hospitals.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01802.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01802.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Demissie Alemayehu, Joseph C. Cappelleri</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-29T20:46:17.01684-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01802.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01802.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01802.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale </b> Despite their inherently pervasive limitations, data from observational studies are increasingly relied upon by health care decision makers to fill critical information gaps created by lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aim and objective </b> The aim and objective of this article was to revisit the major issues associated with observational studies from secondary data sources.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> The method of this article was canvass of the literature.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Sources of bias are highlighted and steps intended to minimize bias are summarized.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Efforts should be made to improve causal inference of treatment effects from observational studies found in secondary data sources. Extra care and caution should be exercised in the interpretation and reporting of results from these studies.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Rationale  Despite their inherently pervasive limitations, data from observational studies are increasingly relied upon by health care decision makers to fill critical information gaps created by lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials.Aim and objective  The aim and objective of this article was to revisit the major issues associated with observational studies from secondary data sources.Method  The method of this article was canvass of the literature.Results  Sources of bias are highlighted and steps intended to minimize bias are summarized.Conclusion  Efforts should be made to improve causal inference of treatment effects from observational studies found in secondary data sources. Extra care and caution should be exercised in the interpretation and reporting of results from these studies.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01659.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>High-value transitional care: translation of research into practice</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01659.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">High-value transitional care: translation of research into practice</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mary D. Naylor, Kathryn H. Bowles, Kathleen M. McCauley, Maureen C. Maccoy, Greg Maislin, Mark V. Pauly, Randall Krakauer</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-03-16T19:39:38.563653-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01659.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01659.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01659.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> To evaluate the impact of translating into a large US health plan, the Transitional Care Model (TCM), an evidence-based approach to address the needs of chronically ill older adults throughout acute episodes of illness.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> A prospective, quasi-experimental study of 172 at-risk Aetna Medicare Advantage members in the mid-Atlantic region who received the TCM. A baseline and post-intervention (average of 2 months) comparison of enrolees' health status and quality of life was conducted. Member and physician satisfaction were assessed within 1 month post intervention. Health resource utilization and cost outcomes were compared to a matched control group of Aetna members at multiple intervals through 1 year.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Improvements in all health status and quality of life measures were observed post- intervention compared to pre-intervention. Among 155 stringently matched pairs, a significant decrease in number of re-hospitalizations (45 vs. 60, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.041) and total hospital days (252 vs. 351, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.032) were observed at 3 months. Reductions in other utilization outcomes or time points were not statistically significant. The TCM was associated with a short-term decrease of $439 per member per month in total health care costs at 3 months and cumulative per member savings of $2170 at 1 year (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.037).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Findings demonstrate that a rigorously tested model of transitional care for chronically ill older adults can be successfully translated into a real-world organization and achieve higher value.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Objective  To evaluate the impact of translating into a large US health plan, the Transitional Care Model (TCM), an evidence-based approach to address the needs of chronically ill older adults throughout acute episodes of illness.Methods  A prospective, quasi-experimental study of 172 at-risk Aetna Medicare Advantage members in the mid-Atlantic region who received the TCM. A baseline and post-intervention (average of 2 months) comparison of enrolees' health status and quality of life was conducted. Member and physician satisfaction were assessed within 1 month post intervention. Health resource utilization and cost outcomes were compared to a matched control group of Aetna members at multiple intervals through 1 year.Results  Improvements in all health status and quality of life measures were observed post- intervention compared to pre-intervention. Among 155 stringently matched pairs, a significant decrease in number of re-hospitalizations (45 vs. 60, P &lt; 0.041) and total hospital days (252 vs. 351, P &lt; 0.032) were observed at 3 months. Reductions in other utilization outcomes or time points were not statistically significant. The TCM was associated with a short-term decrease of $439 per member per month in total health care costs at 3 months and cumulative per member savings of $2170 at 1 year (P &lt; 0.037).Conclusions  Findings demonstrate that a rigorously tested model of transitional care for chronically ill older adults can be successfully translated into a real-world organization and achieve higher value.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01638.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Thinking without knowing – Child psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the UK and evidence-based practice</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01638.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thinking without knowing – Child psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the UK and evidence-based practice</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth Rous, Andrew Clark</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-02-17T21:23:53.149256-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01638.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01638.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01638.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Child psychoanalytic psychotherapy has been criticized for its reluctance to embrace evidence-based practice. This study aims to explore the historical narrative of a sample of child psychoanalytic psychotherapists about progress in developing the evidence base.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Fourteen psychotherapists were interviewed and the transcripts analysed for common themes about evidence-based practice.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Child psychoanalytic psychotherapists were generally positive about developing evidence-based practice but had reservations about the narrowness of hierarchies used by commissioners to assess evidence.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The child psychoanalytical psychotherapists interviewed for this study recognized the need to promote evidence-based practice, in particular, to inform commissioners of Child Mental Health Services.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Background  Child psychoanalytic psychotherapy has been criticized for its reluctance to embrace evidence-based practice. This study aims to explore the historical narrative of a sample of child psychoanalytic psychotherapists about progress in developing the evidence base.Methods  Fourteen psychotherapists were interviewed and the transcripts analysed for common themes about evidence-based practice.Results  Child psychoanalytic psychotherapists were generally positive about developing evidence-based practice but had reservations about the narrowness of hierarchies used by commissioners to assess evidence.Conclusion  The child psychoanalytical psychotherapists interviewed for this study recognized the need to promote evidence-based practice, in particular, to inform commissioners of Child Mental Health Services.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2010.01554.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Comparison of the efficacy of three PubMed search filters in finding randomized controlled trials to answer clinical questions</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2010.01554.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Comparison of the efficacy of three PubMed search filters in finding randomized controlled trials to answer clinical questions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Shirin Irani, Soroush Mortaz-Hedjri, Behnam Shakiba</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2010-09-16T02:31:45.133375-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01554.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01554.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2010.01554.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">no</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three search methods in the retrieval of relevant clinical trials from PubMed to answer specific clinical questions.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Included studies of a sample of 100 Cochrane reviews which recorded in PubMed were considered as the reference standard. The search queries were formulated based on the systematic review titles. Precision, recall and number of retrieved records for limiting the results to clinical trial publication type, and using sensitive and specific clinical queries filters were compared. The number of keywords, presence of specific names of intervention and syndrome in the search keywords were used in a model to predict the recalls and precisions.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The Clinical queries-sensitive search strategy retrieved the largest number of records (33) and had the highest recall (41.6%) and lowest precision (4.8%). The presence of specific intervention name was the only significant predictor of all recalls and precisions (<em>P</em> = 0.016).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The recall and precision of combination of simple clinical search queries and methodological search filters to find clinical trials in various subjects were considerably low. The limit field strategy yielded in higher precision and fewer retrieved records and approximately similar recall, compared with the clinical queries-sensitive strategy. Presence of specific intervention name in the search keywords increased both recall and precision.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Objective  The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three search methods in the retrieval of relevant clinical trials from PubMed to answer specific clinical questions.Methods  Included studies of a sample of 100 Cochrane reviews which recorded in PubMed were considered as the reference standard. The search queries were formulated based on the systematic review titles. Precision, recall and number of retrieved records for limiting the results to clinical trial publication type, and using sensitive and specific clinical queries filters were compared. The number of keywords, presence of specific names of intervention and syndrome in the search keywords were used in a model to predict the recalls and precisions.Results  The Clinical queries-sensitive search strategy retrieved the largest number of records (33) and had the highest recall (41.6%) and lowest precision (4.8%). The presence of specific intervention name was the only significant predictor of all recalls and precisions (P = 0.016).Conclusion  The recall and precision of combination of simple clinical search queries and methodological search filters to find clinical trials in various subjects were considerably low. The limit field strategy yielded in higher precision and fewer retrieved records and approximately similar recall, compared with the clinical queries-sensitive strategy. Presence of specific intervention name in the search keywords increased both recall and precision.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12001" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Issue Information</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12001</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Issue Information</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2013-03-07T23:50:09.279516-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/jep.12001</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/jep.12001</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fjep.12001</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Issue Information</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">i</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">i</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01708.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Physician adherence to asthma treatment guidelines in Japan: focus on inhaled corticosteroids</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01708.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Physician adherence to asthma treatment guidelines in Japan: focus on inhaled corticosteroids</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Toshitaka Morishima, Tetsuya Otsubo, Etsu Gotou, Daisuke Kobayashi, Jason Lee, Yuichi Imanaka</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-06-20T19:51:22.736364-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01708.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01708.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01708.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">223</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">229</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> Asthma treatment guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the first-line therapy. However, ICS are prescribed to lower percentages of asthmatic patients in Japan than in other developed countries. The aim of this study was to reveal factors affecting the prescription of ICS for asthmatic adults.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Using insurance claims data in Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, we performed a cross-sectional study. We assessed whether outpatients aged 15 years or older who were diagnosed with asthma had received ICS or not, and conducted logistic regression analyses to identify patients' and facilities' factors associated with ICS use.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> We analysed 13 428 asthmatic adults, of which 51% were prescribed ICS. Patients receiving asthma care at facilities with respiratory or allergy specialists were more likely to receive ICS than facilities without specialists (adjusted odds ratio 2.70; 95% confidence interval 2.46–2.97). Those aged 75 years or older were less likely to receive ICS than those aged 15 to 64 (adjusted odds ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.78). An examination of the interaction between the presence or absence of specialists and facility training status suggested that whether asthmatic adults received ICS depended on the former factor rather than the latter.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The presence of specialists in facilities and the age of patients were strong factors affecting ICS prescription. Increases in ICS therapy for the elderly and ICS prescription by non-specialists would lead to an overall increase in patients receiving ICS and consequently achieving the goal of asthma control.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Objectives  Asthma treatment guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the first-line therapy. However, ICS are prescribed to lower percentages of asthmatic patients in Japan than in other developed countries. The aim of this study was to reveal factors affecting the prescription of ICS for asthmatic adults.
Methods  Using insurance claims data in Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, we performed a cross-sectional study. We assessed whether outpatients aged 15 years or older who were diagnosed with asthma had received ICS or not, and conducted logistic regression analyses to identify patients' and facilities' factors associated with ICS use.
Results  We analysed 13 428 asthmatic adults, of which 51% were prescribed ICS. Patients receiving asthma care at facilities with respiratory or allergy specialists were more likely to receive ICS than facilities without specialists (adjusted odds ratio 2.70; 95% confidence interval 2.46–2.97). Those aged 75 years or older were less likely to receive ICS than those aged 15 to 64 (adjusted odds ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.78). An examination of the interaction between the presence or absence of specialists and facility training status suggested that whether asthmatic adults received ICS depended on the former factor rather than the latter.
Conclusion  The presence of specialists in facilities and the age of patients were strong factors affecting ICS prescription. Increases in ICS therapy for the elderly and ICS prescription by non-specialists would lead to an overall increase in patients receiving ICS and consequently achieving the goal of asthma control.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01801.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Feedback as a strategy to change behaviour: the devil is in the details</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01801.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Feedback as a strategy to change behaviour: the devil is in the details</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elaine L. Larson, Sameer J. Patel, David Evans, Lisa Saiman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-29T20:46:03.733119-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01801.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01801.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01801.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">230</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">234</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Performance feedback is one of a number of strategies used to improve clinical practice among students and clinicians.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> The aims of this paper were to examine conceptual underpinnings and essential components for audit and feedback strategies, to assess the extent to which recently published audit and feedback interventions include these components and to recommend future directions for feedback to improve its educational and behavioural impact.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Based on the actionable feedback model, we examined the presence of four theoretical constructs – timeliness, individualization, lack of punitiveness and customizability – in studies published during 2009–2010 which included a feedback intervention.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> There was wide variation in the definition, implementation and outcomes of ‘feedback’ interventions, making it difficult to compare across studies. None of the studies we reviewed included all of the components of the actionable feedback model.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Feedback interventions reported to date, even when results are positive, often fail to include concepts of behaviour change. This may partially explain the large variation in approaches and in results of such interventions and presents major challenges for replicating any given intervention. If feedback processes are to be successfully used and disseminated and implemented widely, some standardization and certainly more clarity is needed in the specific action steps taken to apply behavioural theory to practice.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background  Performance feedback is one of a number of strategies used to improve clinical practice among students and clinicians.
Objectives  The aims of this paper were to examine conceptual underpinnings and essential components for audit and feedback strategies, to assess the extent to which recently published audit and feedback interventions include these components and to recommend future directions for feedback to improve its educational and behavioural impact.
Methods  Based on the actionable feedback model, we examined the presence of four theoretical constructs – timeliness, individualization, lack of punitiveness and customizability – in studies published during 2009–2010 which included a feedback intervention.
Results  There was wide variation in the definition, implementation and outcomes of ‘feedback’ interventions, making it difficult to compare across studies. None of the studies we reviewed included all of the components of the actionable feedback model.
Conclusions  Feedback interventions reported to date, even when results are positive, often fail to include concepts of behaviour change. This may partially explain the large variation in approaches and in results of such interventions and presents major challenges for replicating any given intervention. If feedback processes are to be successfully used and disseminated and implemented widely, some standardization and certainly more clarity is needed in the specific action steps taken to apply behavioural theory to practice.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01803.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Managing asthma in primary care through imperative outcomes</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01803.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Managing asthma in primary care through imperative outcomes</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesslee M. du Plessis, Jan J. Gerber, Linda Brand</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-05T20:10:47.141633-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01803.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01803.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01803.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">235</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">242</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> To evaluate asthma management and control in primary care clinics so as to design improvements based on guideline-directed outcomes.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> In this study, all medical records of asthma-diagnosed patients (children as well as adults, entire lifespan, asthma-related visits or not) were retrospectively reviewed as a basis for assessing the level of guideline adherence and asthma control. Six primary health care clinics were visited in the Dr Kenneth Kaunda Municipal District, Potchefstroom, South Africa during May to July 2008, 2009 and 2010.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> A total of 323 asthma patient records were reviewed over the three time slots, resulting in 125, 87, and 111 patients respectively. A suboptimal clinical asthma control picture, with a mere 16% (n = 20) of females and 2% (n = 3) of males with Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) percentages above 60%, were observed in the initial assessment. Improvement in control was observed during the following time slot, but with an end result in 2010 of no PEF percentages above 60% for males and only 9% (n = 7) for females.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Over all three of the data collection periods adherence to effectively applied management of asthma guidelines proved to be below the minimum recommended clinical evaluation work-up as set out by the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR3) of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). Applying a greater focus on essential outcomes through different disease management documents resulted in an improved quality of managed care, but still requires dedicated and continuous education and motivation. (NWU-0052-08-A5)</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  To evaluate asthma management and control in primary care clinics so as to design improvements based on guideline-directed outcomes.
Methods  In this study, all medical records of asthma-diagnosed patients (children as well as adults, entire lifespan, asthma-related visits or not) were retrospectively reviewed as a basis for assessing the level of guideline adherence and asthma control. Six primary health care clinics were visited in the Dr Kenneth Kaunda Municipal District, Potchefstroom, South Africa during May to July 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Results  A total of 323 asthma patient records were reviewed over the three time slots, resulting in 125, 87, and 111 patients respectively. A suboptimal clinical asthma control picture, with a mere 16% (n = 20) of females and 2% (n = 3) of males with Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) percentages above 60%, were observed in the initial assessment. Improvement in control was observed during the following time slot, but with an end result in 2010 of no PEF percentages above 60% for males and only 9% (n = 7) for females.
Conclusion  Over all three of the data collection periods adherence to effectively applied management of asthma guidelines proved to be below the minimum recommended clinical evaluation work-up as set out by the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR3) of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). Applying a greater focus on essential outcomes through different disease management documents resulted in an improved quality of managed care, but still requires dedicated and continuous education and motivation. (NWU-0052-08-A5)
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01806.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>GP cooperative and emergency department: an exploration of patient flows</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01806.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GP cooperative and emergency department: an exploration of patient flows</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linda Huibers, Wendy Thijssen, Jan Koetsenruijter, Paul Giesen, Richard Grol, Michel Wensing</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-05T20:13:04.097373-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01806.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01806.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01806.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">243</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">249</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> In most countries, different health care providers are involved in emergency care. In the Netherlands, out-of-hours care is provided by general practitioner cooperatives (GPCs) and emergency departments (EDs). Our aim was to describe the flow of patients attending emergency care in these settings.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A retrospective record review was performed, concerning patients who had visited a GPC or ED. Recorded information included urgency, diagnostic tests, and follow-up contacts. Descriptive figures were determined for patient flows in GPC and ED for urgent contacts and non-urgent contacts.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> We included 319 GPC contacts and 356 ED contacts, of which 78% were non-urgent. The majority of GPC contacts were completed at the GPC without follow-up; 37% of non-urgent patients had a follow-up contact, usually with primary care. Only 5% of non-urgent GPC patients received diagnostic tests compared to 63% of non-urgent ED patients (mostly X-rays). The majority of non-urgent ED patients (88%) had a follow-up contact, usually at an outpatient clinic (67%). Most non-urgent ED patients (83%) who received a diagnostic test also had an outpatient clinic follow-up contact. Of urgent ED patients, the majority had a follow-up contact (85%), mostly with an outpatient clinic (74%).</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Although most out-of-hours care patients present non-urgent health problems, at the ED they are more likely to receive diagnostic tests and follow-up contacts. This may reflect differences in patient populations between the ED and GPC or suggest opportunities for improving efficiency of planning follow-up contacts.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  In most countries, different health care providers are involved in emergency care. In the Netherlands, out-of-hours care is provided by general practitioner cooperatives (GPCs) and emergency departments (EDs). Our aim was to describe the flow of patients attending emergency care in these settings.
Method  A retrospective record review was performed, concerning patients who had visited a GPC or ED. Recorded information included urgency, diagnostic tests, and follow-up contacts. Descriptive figures were determined for patient flows in GPC and ED for urgent contacts and non-urgent contacts.
Results  We included 319 GPC contacts and 356 ED contacts, of which 78% were non-urgent. The majority of GPC contacts were completed at the GPC without follow-up; 37% of non-urgent patients had a follow-up contact, usually with primary care. Only 5% of non-urgent GPC patients received diagnostic tests compared to 63% of non-urgent ED patients (mostly X-rays). The majority of non-urgent ED patients (88%) had a follow-up contact, usually at an outpatient clinic (67%). Most non-urgent ED patients (83%) who received a diagnostic test also had an outpatient clinic follow-up contact. Of urgent ED patients, the majority had a follow-up contact (85%), mostly with an outpatient clinic (74%).
Conclusion  Although most out-of-hours care patients present non-urgent health problems, at the ED they are more likely to receive diagnostic tests and follow-up contacts. This may reflect differences in patient populations between the ED and GPC or suggest opportunities for improving efficiency of planning follow-up contacts.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01808.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A novel Internet-based blended learning programme providing core competency in clinical research</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01808.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A novel Internet-based blended learning programme providing core competency in clinical research</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yukio Tsugihashi, Naoki Kakudate, Yoko Yokoyama, Yosuke Yamamoto, Hiroki Mishina, Norio Fukumori, Fumiaki Nakamura, Misa Takegami, Shinya Ohno, Takafumi Wakita, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Shunichi Fukuhara</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-02T05:10:23.584832-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01808.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01808.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01808.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">250</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">255</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> We developed a novel Internet-based blended learning programme that allows busy health care professionals to attain core competency in clinical research. This study details the educational strategies and learning outcomes of the programme.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> This study was conducted at Kyoto University and seven satellite campuses from September 2009 to March 2010. A total of 176 health care professionals who had never attempted to attain core competency in clinical research were enrolled. The participants were supplied with a novel programme comprising the following four strategies: online live lectures at seven satellite campuses, short examinations after each lecture, an Internet-based feedback system and an end-of-course examination. We assessed the proportion of attendance at the lectures as the main outcome. In addition, we evaluated interaction via the feedback system and scores for end-of-course examination.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Of the 176 participants, 134 (76%) reported working more than 40 hours per week. The mean proportion of attendance over all 23 lectures was 82%. A total of 156 (89%) participants attended more than 60% of all lectures and were eligible for the end-of-course examination. A total of the participants accessed the feedback system 3564 times and asked 284 questions. No statistically significant differences were noted in the end-of-course scores among medical doctors, pharmacists, registered nurses and other occupations.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> We developed an Internet-based blended learning programme providing core competency in clinical research. Most busy health care professionals completed the programme successfully. In addition, the participants could attain the core competency effectively, regardless of their occupation.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  We developed a novel Internet-based blended learning programme that allows busy health care professionals to attain core competency in clinical research. This study details the educational strategies and learning outcomes of the programme.
Method  This study was conducted at Kyoto University and seven satellite campuses from September 2009 to March 2010. A total of 176 health care professionals who had never attempted to attain core competency in clinical research were enrolled. The participants were supplied with a novel programme comprising the following four strategies: online live lectures at seven satellite campuses, short examinations after each lecture, an Internet-based feedback system and an end-of-course examination. We assessed the proportion of attendance at the lectures as the main outcome. In addition, we evaluated interaction via the feedback system and scores for end-of-course examination.
Results  Of the 176 participants, 134 (76%) reported working more than 40 hours per week. The mean proportion of attendance over all 23 lectures was 82%. A total of 156 (89%) participants attended more than 60% of all lectures and were eligible for the end-of-course examination. A total of the participants accessed the feedback system 3564 times and asked 284 questions. No statistically significant differences were noted in the end-of-course scores among medical doctors, pharmacists, registered nurses and other occupations.
Conclusions  We developed an Internet-based blended learning programme providing core competency in clinical research. Most busy health care professionals completed the programme successfully. In addition, the participants could attain the core competency effectively, regardless of their occupation.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01809.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Disappearing and reappearing differences in drug-eluting stent use by race</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01809.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Disappearing and reappearing differences in drug-eluting stent use by race</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerome J. Federspiel, Sally C. Stearns, Kristin L. Reiter, Kimberley H. Geissler, Matthew A. Triplette, Laura P. D'Arcy, Brett C. Sheridan, Joseph S. Rossi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-02T05:10:17.173682-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01809.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01809.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01809.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">256</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">262</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) rapidly dominated the marketplace in the United States after approval in 2003, but utilization rates were initially lower among African American patients. We assess whether racial differences persisted as DES diffused into practice.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Medicare claims data were used to identify coronary stenting procedures among elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Regression models of the choice of DES versus bare mental stent controlled for demographics, ACS type, co-morbidities and hospital characteristics. Diffusion was assessed in the short run (2003–2004) and long run (2007), with the effect of race calculated to allow for time-varying effects.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The sample included 381 887 Medicare beneficiaries treated with stent insertion; approximately 5% were African American. Initially (May 2003–February 2004), African American race was associated with lower DES use compared to other races (44.3% versus 46.5%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Once DES usage was high in all patients (March–December 2004), differences were not significant (79.8% versus 80.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.45). Subsequent concerns regarding DES safety caused reductions in DES use, with African Americans having lower use than other racial groups in 2007 (63.1% versus 65.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Racial disparities in DES use initially disappeared during a period of rapid diffusion and high usage rates; the reappearance of disparities in use by 2007 may reflect DES use tailored to unmeasured aspects of case mix and socio-economic status. Further work is needed to understand whether underlying differences in race reflect decisions regarding treatment appropriateness.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  Drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) rapidly dominated the marketplace in the United States after approval in 2003, but utilization rates were initially lower among African American patients. We assess whether racial differences persisted as DES diffused into practice.
Methods  Medicare claims data were used to identify coronary stenting procedures among elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Regression models of the choice of DES versus bare mental stent controlled for demographics, ACS type, co-morbidities and hospital characteristics. Diffusion was assessed in the short run (2003–2004) and long run (2007), with the effect of race calculated to allow for time-varying effects.
Results  The sample included 381 887 Medicare beneficiaries treated with stent insertion; approximately 5% were African American. Initially (May 2003–February 2004), African American race was associated with lower DES use compared to other races (44.3% versus 46.5%, P &lt; 0.01). Once DES usage was high in all patients (March–December 2004), differences were not significant (79.8% versus 80.3%, P = 0.45). Subsequent concerns regarding DES safety caused reductions in DES use, with African Americans having lower use than other racial groups in 2007 (63.1% versus 65.2%, P &lt; 0.01).
Conclusions  Racial disparities in DES use initially disappeared during a period of rapid diffusion and high usage rates; the reappearance of disparities in use by 2007 may reflect DES use tailored to unmeasured aspects of case mix and socio-economic status. Further work is needed to understand whether underlying differences in race reflect decisions regarding treatment appropriateness.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01814.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Improving rates of herpes zoster vaccination with a clinical decision support system in a primary care practice</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01814.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Improving rates of herpes zoster vaccination with a clinical decision support system in a primary care practice</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rajeev Chaudhry, Sidna M. Schietel, Fred North, Ramona Dejesus, Rebecca L. Kesman, Robert J. Stroebel</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-05T20:13:11.313371-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01814.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01814.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2011.01814.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">263</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">266</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale </b> Herpes zoster (shingles) is a localized neurocutaneous eruption of blisters caused by reactivation of the varicella zoster virus. The cost of care for herpes zoster and its complications is estimated at $1.1 billion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends a one-time dose of the vaccine for adults aged 60 years or older. Despite that recommendation, utilization of the vaccine is very low. One way to boost the delivery of preventive services such as vaccinations is with a computerized clinical decision support system. Our study found that the herpes zoster vaccination rate increased significantly after the implementation of such a system.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aims </b> To study utilization of herpes zoster vaccine before and after the implementation of a web-based clinical decision support software solution in a primary care practice.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Billing data was utilized to determine number of herpes zoster vaccination administered to patients for a 12-month period during the implementation of the software solution.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The utilization of vaccinations improved from 63 to 117 (53.8% increase) for one primary care practice and from 54 to 127 (42.5% increase) in the other primary care practice.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Herpes zoster vaccination rate significantly improved with implementation of a web-based clinical decision support system.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale  Herpes zoster (shingles) is a localized neurocutaneous eruption of blisters caused by reactivation of the varicella zoster virus. The cost of care for herpes zoster and its complications is estimated at $1.1 billion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends a one-time dose of the vaccine for adults aged 60 years or older. Despite that recommendation, utilization of the vaccine is very low. One way to boost the delivery of preventive services such as vaccinations is with a computerized clinical decision support system. Our study found that the herpes zoster vaccination rate increased significantly after the implementation of such a system.
Aims  To study utilization of herpes zoster vaccine before and after the implementation of a web-based clinical decision support software solution in a primary care practice.
Methods  Billing data was utilized to determine number of herpes zoster vaccination administered to patients for a 12-month period during the implementation of the software solution.
Results  The utilization of vaccinations improved from 63 to 117 (53.8% increase) for one primary care practice and from 54 to 127 (42.5% increase) in the other primary care practice.
Conclusion  Herpes zoster vaccination rate significantly improved with implementation of a web-based clinical decision support system.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01818.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Obtaining the mean relative weights of the cost of care in Catalonia (Spain): retrospective application of the adjusted clinical groups case-mix system in primary health care</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01818.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Obtaining the mean relative weights of the cost of care in Catalonia (Spain): retrospective application of the adjusted clinical groups case-mix system in primary health care</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antoni Sicras-Mainar, Soledad Velasco-Velasco, Ruth Navarro-Artieda, Alba Aguado Jodar, Oleguer Plana-Ripoll, Eduardo Hermosilla-Pérez, Bonaventura Bolibar-Ribas, Alejandra Prados-Torres, Concepción Violan-Fors</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-27T20:10:13.179867-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01818.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01818.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01818.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">267</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">276</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> The study aims to obtain the mean relative weights (MRWs) of the cost of care through the retrospective application of the adjusted clinical groups (ACGs) in several primary health care (PHC) centres in Catalonia (Spain) in routine clinical practice.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> This is a retrospective study based on computerized medical records. All patients attended by 13 PHC teams in 2008 were included. The principle measurements were: demographic variables (age and sex), dependent variables (number of diagnoses and total costs), and case-mix or co-morbidity variables (International Classification of Primary Care). The costs model for each patient was established by differentiating the fix costs from the variable costs. In the bivariate analysis, the Student's <em>t</em>, analysis of variance, chi-squared, Pearson's linear correlation and Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests were used. In order to compare the MRW of the present study with those of the United States (US), the concordance [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC)] and the correlation (coefficient of determination: <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) were measured.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The total number of patients studied was 227 235, and the frequentation was 5.9 visits/habitant/year) and with a mean diagnoses number of 4.5 (3.2). The distribution of costs was €148.7 million, of which 29.1% were fixed costs. The mean total cost per patient/year was €654.2 (851.7), which was considered to be the reference MRW. Relationship between study-MRW and US-MRW: ICC was 0.40 [confidential interval (CI) 95%: 0.21–0.60] and the CCC was 0.42 (CI 95%: 0.35–0.49). The correlation between the US MRW and the MRW of the present study can be seen; the adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> value is 0.691. The explanatory power of the ACG classification was 36.9% for the total costs. The <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of the total cost without considering outliers was 56.9%.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The methodology has been shown appropriate for promoting the calculation of the MRW for each category of the classification. The results provide a possible practical application in PHC clinical management.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Objective  The study aims to obtain the mean relative weights (MRWs) of the cost of care through the retrospective application of the adjusted clinical groups (ACGs) in several primary health care (PHC) centres in Catalonia (Spain) in routine clinical practice.
Methods  This is a retrospective study based on computerized medical records. All patients attended by 13 PHC teams in 2008 were included. The principle measurements were: demographic variables (age and sex), dependent variables (number of diagnoses and total costs), and case-mix or co-morbidity variables (International Classification of Primary Care). The costs model for each patient was established by differentiating the fix costs from the variable costs. In the bivariate analysis, the Student's t, analysis of variance, chi-squared, Pearson's linear correlation and Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tests were used. In order to compare the MRW of the present study with those of the United States (US), the concordance [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC)] and the correlation (coefficient of determination: R2) were measured.
Results  The total number of patients studied was 227 235, and the frequentation was 5.9 visits/habitant/year) and with a mean diagnoses number of 4.5 (3.2). The distribution of costs was €148.7 million, of which 29.1% were fixed costs. The mean total cost per patient/year was €654.2 (851.7), which was considered to be the reference MRW. Relationship between study-MRW and US-MRW: ICC was 0.40 [confidential interval (CI) 95%: 0.21–0.60] and the CCC was 0.42 (CI 95%: 0.35–0.49). The correlation between the US MRW and the MRW of the present study can be seen; the adjusted R2 value is 0.691. The explanatory power of the ACG classification was 36.9% for the total costs. The R2 of the total cost without considering outliers was 56.9%.
Conclusions  The methodology has been shown appropriate for promoting the calculation of the MRW for each category of the classification. The results provide a possible practical application in PHC clinical management.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01819.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A computer tool for cardiovascular risk estimation according to Framingham and SCORE equations</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01819.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A computer tool for cardiovascular risk estimation according to Framingham and SCORE equations</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesús Ramírez-Rodrigo, José Antonio Moreno-Vázquez, Alberto Ruiz-Villaverde, María Ángeles Sánchez-Caravaca, Martín Lopez de la Torre-Casares, Carmen Villaverde-Gutiérrez</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-19T21:03:31.717867-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01819.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01819.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01819.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">277</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">284</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Currently, we have different scales to estimate the cardiovascular risk of one individual. The most commonly used in clinical practice are the Framingham method and the SCORE project. Both are based on mathematical models that take into account the presence and intensity of various risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aims and objectives </b> The aim of our study was to develop a measurement system that allows unifying criteria of both models. Thus, we will be able to estimate the cardiovascular risk globally in a cohort of patients instead of individually.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> The study included a representative subgroup of 50 patients treated at in the Endocrinology Service of Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, below 30 years or above 75 years. The equations used in the present study were in strict compliance with the original publications. The reliability and validity of results were tested, comparing them with results obtained using calculation programs developed, available on-line. The degree of similarity was determined by means of the Dice index and the distance between our values and those of the other programs were compared by using the expression: D<sub>a–b</sub> = √Σ(a − b)<sup>2</sup></p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The results of the present study demonstrated our application to be reliable and valid for cardiovascular risk assessment. Our observations also demonstrated differences in the criteria applied to create cardiovascular risk calculation tools. This may have repercussions on clinical decisions for some patients, suggesting a need to compare and standardize these criteria, ensuring that programs developed for this calculation correctly manage the different risk categories considered.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The present study validates a computer tool developed for the simultaneous calculation of cardiovascular disease probability by applying Framingham-Anderson and Framingham-Wilson methods, the Spanish adaptations of Regicor and Dorica, and the SCORE project.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background  Currently, we have different scales to estimate the cardiovascular risk of one individual. The most commonly used in clinical practice are the Framingham method and the SCORE project. Both are based on mathematical models that take into account the presence and intensity of various risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Aims and objectives  The aim of our study was to develop a measurement system that allows unifying criteria of both models. Thus, we will be able to estimate the cardiovascular risk globally in a cohort of patients instead of individually.
Methods  The study included a representative subgroup of 50 patients treated at in the Endocrinology Service of Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, below 30 years or above 75 years. The equations used in the present study were in strict compliance with the original publications. The reliability and validity of results were tested, comparing them with results obtained using calculation programs developed, available on-line. The degree of similarity was determined by means of the Dice index and the distance between our values and those of the other programs were compared by using the expression: Da–b = √Σ(a − b)2
Results  The results of the present study demonstrated our application to be reliable and valid for cardiovascular risk assessment. Our observations also demonstrated differences in the criteria applied to create cardiovascular risk calculation tools. This may have repercussions on clinical decisions for some patients, suggesting a need to compare and standardize these criteria, ensuring that programs developed for this calculation correctly manage the different risk categories considered.
Conclusion  The present study validates a computer tool developed for the simultaneous calculation of cardiovascular disease probability by applying Framingham-Anderson and Framingham-Wilson methods, the Spanish adaptations of Regicor and Dorica, and the SCORE project.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01820.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of an educational patient safety campaign on patients' safety behaviours and adverse events</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01820.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of an educational patient safety campaign on patients' safety behaviours and adverse events</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David L.B. Schwappach, Olga Frank, Ute Buschmann, Reto Babst</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:15:39.66419-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01820.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01820.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01820.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">285</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">291</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> The study aims to investigate the effects of a patient safety advisory on patients' risk perceptions, perceived behavioural control, performance of safety behaviours and experience of adverse incidents.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> Quasi-experimental intervention study with non-equivalent group comparison was used. Patients admitted to the surgical department of a Swiss large non-university hospital were included. Patients in the intervention group received a safety advisory at their first clinical encounter. Outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire at discharge. Odds ratios for control versus intervention group were calculated. Regression analysis was used to model the effects of the intervention and safety behaviours on the experience of safety incidents.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Two hundred eighteen patients in the control and 202 in the intervention group completed the survey (75 and 77% response rates, respectively). Patients in the intervention group were less likely to feel poorly informed about medical errors (OR = 0.55, <em>P</em> = 0.043). There were 73.1% in the intervention and 84.3% in the control group who underestimated the risk for infection (OR = 0.51, CI 0.31–0.84, <em>P</em> = 0.009). Perceived behavioural control was lower in the control group (mean<sub>Con</sub> = 3.2, mean<sub>Int</sub> = 3.5, <em>P</em> = 0.010). Performance of safety-related behaviours was unaffected by the intervention. Patients in the intervention group were less likely to experience any safety-related incident or unsafe situation (OR for intervention group = 0.57, CI 0.38–0.87, <em>P</em> = 0.009). There were no differences in concerns for errors during hospitalization. There were 96% of patients (intervention) who would recommend other patients to read the advisory.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The results suggest that the safety advisory decreases experiences of adverse events and unsafe situations. It renders awareness and perceived behavioural control without increasing concerns for safety and can thus serve as a useful instrument for communication about safety between health care workers and patients.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  The study aims to investigate the effects of a patient safety advisory on patients' risk perceptions, perceived behavioural control, performance of safety behaviours and experience of adverse incidents.
Method  Quasi-experimental intervention study with non-equivalent group comparison was used. Patients admitted to the surgical department of a Swiss large non-university hospital were included. Patients in the intervention group received a safety advisory at their first clinical encounter. Outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire at discharge. Odds ratios for control versus intervention group were calculated. Regression analysis was used to model the effects of the intervention and safety behaviours on the experience of safety incidents.
Results  Two hundred eighteen patients in the control and 202 in the intervention group completed the survey (75 and 77% response rates, respectively). Patients in the intervention group were less likely to feel poorly informed about medical errors (OR = 0.55, P = 0.043). There were 73.1% in the intervention and 84.3% in the control group who underestimated the risk for infection (OR = 0.51, CI 0.31–0.84, P = 0.009). Perceived behavioural control was lower in the control group (meanCon = 3.2, meanInt = 3.5, P = 0.010). Performance of safety-related behaviours was unaffected by the intervention. Patients in the intervention group were less likely to experience any safety-related incident or unsafe situation (OR for intervention group = 0.57, CI 0.38–0.87, P = 0.009). There were no differences in concerns for errors during hospitalization. There were 96% of patients (intervention) who would recommend other patients to read the advisory.
Conclusions  The results suggest that the safety advisory decreases experiences of adverse events and unsafe situations. It renders awareness and perceived behavioural control without increasing concerns for safety and can thus serve as a useful instrument for communication about safety between health care workers and patients.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01821.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Evidence databases application: comparison of university faculties versus clinical residents in a developing country</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01821.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evidence databases application: comparison of university faculties versus clinical residents in a developing country</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fatemeh Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Lily Nosraty, Morteza Ghojazadeh, Ali Mostafaie</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:15:55.842054-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01821.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01821.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01821.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">292</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">297</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> One of the main barriers against the implementation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the lack of search skills, an element that affects the finding of the best available evidence. Faculty staff should be capable of using the best evidence in practice and of teaching students to implement EBM elements. They should be familiar with search strategies and evidence databases. The aim of this study is to compare the application of evidence databases by faculties and by residents with no training in this field.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Two hundred fifty-seven faculties and first-year residents of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences filled out a valid self-administered questionnaire on information-seeking behaviour from August 2008 to June 2010. A chi-square test was used to compare the variables.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> There were 52.1% of the respondents who were faculty members and 47.9% were residents. Only 8.7% used the Internet for their practice mostly. While Google was the most used resource, TRIP and Cochrane were less used. Significantly, the faculties used these resources more than the residents in both cases. Furthermore, two-thirds of the participants were unfamiliar with medical subject headings (MeSH), and only 14.5% consulted a clinical librarian for help.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Significantly, clinicians used evidence databases and online resources minimally for their practice. Additionally, as the faculties used EBM resources more than the residents, this programme should be considered for inclusion in the curricula of medical schools.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  One of the main barriers against the implementation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the lack of search skills, an element that affects the finding of the best available evidence. Faculty staff should be capable of using the best evidence in practice and of teaching students to implement EBM elements. They should be familiar with search strategies and evidence databases. The aim of this study is to compare the application of evidence databases by faculties and by residents with no training in this field.
Methods  Two hundred fifty-seven faculties and first-year residents of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences filled out a valid self-administered questionnaire on information-seeking behaviour from August 2008 to June 2010. A chi-square test was used to compare the variables.
Results  There were 52.1% of the respondents who were faculty members and 47.9% were residents. Only 8.7% used the Internet for their practice mostly. While Google was the most used resource, TRIP and Cochrane were less used. Significantly, the faculties used these resources more than the residents in both cases. Furthermore, two-thirds of the participants were unfamiliar with medical subject headings (MeSH), and only 14.5% consulted a clinical librarian for help.
Conclusion  Significantly, clinicians used evidence databases and online resources minimally for their practice. Additionally, as the faculties used EBM resources more than the residents, this programme should be considered for inclusion in the curricula of medical schools.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01822.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01822.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Golam M. Khandaker, Praveen K. Gandamaneni, Claire R. M. Dibben, Srinivasarao Cherukuru, Paul Cairns, Manaan K. Ray</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-23T20:15:46.429634-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01822.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01822.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01822.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">298</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">303</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> In view of forthcoming ‘payment by results’ (PbR) for mental health, increasing number of National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are reorganizing their community services for working age adults to create care pathways. However, research base for the care pathways model in mental health is limited. Our NHS Foundation Trust was one of the first to introduce care pathways for community psychiatry in the UK. We have carried out a qualitative study to evaluate how this model works out in practice, including its impact on quality of patient care, mental health professionals and primary care.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> We interviewed doctors, multidisciplinary staff and Trusts managers (19 in total). Transcripts of recorded interviews were coded and analysed thematically using a grounded theory approach.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Overall, despite teething problems, working in pathways was generally seen as a positive change. It led to more focused interventions being offered, and practitioners being held to account over clear standards of care. It is more cost-effective and allows for active case management and clear clinical leadership. It is recovery focused and encourages social inclusion. The arbitrary time frame, strict criteria and thresholds for different teams can create issues. Improved communication, flexible and patient-centred approach, staff supervision, and increasing support to primary care were felt to be central to this model working efficiently and effectively.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Introduction of care pathways is an important step towards effective implementation of PbR for mental health. Our study would inform future research into care pathways, facilitate organizational learning and help to improve effectiveness of services.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Objectives  In view of forthcoming ‘payment by results’ (PbR) for mental health, increasing number of National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are reorganizing their community services for working age adults to create care pathways. However, research base for the care pathways model in mental health is limited. Our NHS Foundation Trust was one of the first to introduce care pathways for community psychiatry in the UK. We have carried out a qualitative study to evaluate how this model works out in practice, including its impact on quality of patient care, mental health professionals and primary care.
Methods  We interviewed doctors, multidisciplinary staff and Trusts managers (19 in total). Transcripts of recorded interviews were coded and analysed thematically using a grounded theory approach.
Results  Overall, despite teething problems, working in pathways was generally seen as a positive change. It led to more focused interventions being offered, and practitioners being held to account over clear standards of care. It is more cost-effective and allows for active case management and clear clinical leadership. It is recovery focused and encourages social inclusion. The arbitrary time frame, strict criteria and thresholds for different teams can create issues. Improved communication, flexible and patient-centred approach, staff supervision, and increasing support to primary care were felt to be central to this model working efficiently and effectively.
Conclusions  Introduction of care pathways is an important step towards effective implementation of PbR for mental health. Our study would inform future research into care pathways, facilitate organizational learning and help to improve effectiveness of services.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01823.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A nationwide evaluation on electronic medication-related information provided by hospital websites</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01823.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A nationwide evaluation on electronic medication-related information provided by hospital websites</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hsiang-Wen Lin, Chung-Hui Ku, Jui-fen Li, An Chee Tan, Chia-Hung Chou</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:16:04.479374-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01823.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01823.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01823.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">304</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">310</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rational, aims and objectives </b> The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of electronic medication-related information (e-MRI) via Internet offered by the hospital settings in Taiwan.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> The structured Internet search and comprehensive review were performed on the most commonly used search engines in Taiwan. The assessment checklists were developed to describe the characteristics of general, e-MRI in the years 2008 and 2010, and specific digoxin information in 2011 based on the operational definitions derived from other studies. The descriptive analyses and chi-square tests for the retrieved data were performed.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> With approximately 15% of hospital settings providing general, e-MRI on their websites, their content varied but was not statistically significant, and different among the providers from different levels of hospitals and in different years. More medical centres provided the information with the updated dates and contact approaches than the smaller scale hospitals. Little was found about reference citation and authorships for those general, e-MRI websites. More medical centres created the accesses to search for the individual prescription in the corresponding settings and the specific information about digoxin storage. However, more district hospitals provided the precaution and dosage form information about digoxin.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The providers to offer the e-MRI via hospital websites in Taiwan could be more responsible for its update, authorship and evidence. Further, the provision of electronic medication-related information via the Internet should be regularly examined or audited by the neutral personnel or organizations to ensure its quality.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rational, aims and objectives  The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of electronic medication-related information (e-MRI) via Internet offered by the hospital settings in Taiwan.
Methods  The structured Internet search and comprehensive review were performed on the most commonly used search engines in Taiwan. The assessment checklists were developed to describe the characteristics of general, e-MRI in the years 2008 and 2010, and specific digoxin information in 2011 based on the operational definitions derived from other studies. The descriptive analyses and chi-square tests for the retrieved data were performed.
Results  With approximately 15% of hospital settings providing general, e-MRI on their websites, their content varied but was not statistically significant, and different among the providers from different levels of hospitals and in different years. More medical centres provided the information with the updated dates and contact approaches than the smaller scale hospitals. Little was found about reference citation and authorships for those general, e-MRI websites. More medical centres created the accesses to search for the individual prescription in the corresponding settings and the specific information about digoxin storage. However, more district hospitals provided the precaution and dosage form information about digoxin.
Conclusions  The providers to offer the e-MRI via hospital websites in Taiwan could be more responsible for its update, authorship and evidence. Further, the provision of electronic medication-related information via the Internet should be regularly examined or audited by the neutral personnel or organizations to ensure its quality.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01824.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Potential biases in colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood test</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01824.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Potential biases in colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood test</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dea Grip Riboe, Tilde Steen Dogan, John Brodersen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:19:33.211259-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01824.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01824.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01824.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">311</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">316</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer in European countries and associated with a high mortality rate. A 16% relative risk reduction (RRR) of mortality was found in a meta-analysis based on four randomized controlled trials (RCT) on CRC screening. The aim of this paper was to scrutinize these trials for potential biases and assess their influence on the screening trials.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> The four RCTs were reviewed based on the principles of ‘Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature’. Principal investigators of the four RCTs were contacted to clarify uncertainties in their study. Data were collected from The Danish Data Archives. Authors of the Cochrane review were contacted.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Six biases were identified, of which five favour screening. Three of the biases identified were specific to CRC screening: type of diagnostic method, place of surgery and diagnostic delay.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The 16% RRR in CRC mortality found in the updated Cochrane review's meta-analysis is overestimated.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background  Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer in European countries and associated with a high mortality rate. A 16% relative risk reduction (RRR) of mortality was found in a meta-analysis based on four randomized controlled trials (RCT) on CRC screening. The aim of this paper was to scrutinize these trials for potential biases and assess their influence on the screening trials.
Methods  The four RCTs were reviewed based on the principles of ‘Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature’. Principal investigators of the four RCTs were contacted to clarify uncertainties in their study. Data were collected from The Danish Data Archives. Authors of the Cochrane review were contacted.
Results  Six biases were identified, of which five favour screening. Three of the biases identified were specific to CRC screening: type of diagnostic method, place of surgery and diagnostic delay.
Conclusion  The 16% RRR in CRC mortality found in the updated Cochrane review's meta-analysis is overestimated.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01825.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Development of a behavioural marker system for scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (SPLINTS system)</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01825.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Development of a behavioural marker system for scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (SPLINTS system)</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucy Mitchell, Rhona Flin, Steven Yule, Janet Mitchell, Kathy Coutts, George Youngson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-04-15T21:30:42.923988-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01825.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01825.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01825.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">317</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">323</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Adverse events still occur despite ongoing efforts to reduce harm to patients. Contributory factors to adverse events are often due to limitations in clinicians’ non-technical skills (e.g. communication, situation awareness), rather than deficiencies in technical competence. We developed a behavioural rating system to provide a structured means for teaching and assessing scrub practitioners’ (i.e. nurse, technician, operating department practitioner) non-technical skills.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> Psychologists facilitated focus groups (<em>n</em> = 4) with experienced scrub practitioners (<em>n</em> = 16; 4 in each group) to develop a preliminary taxonomy. Focus groups reviewed lists of non-technical-skill-related behaviours that were extracted from an interview study. The focus groups labelled skill categories and elements and also provided examples of good and poor behaviours for those skills. An expert panel (<em>n</em> = 2 psychologists; <em>n</em> = 1 expert nurse) then used an iterative process to individually and collaboratively review and refine those data to produce a prototype skills taxonomy.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> A preliminary taxonomy containing eight non-technical skill categories with 28 underlying elements was produced. The expert panel reduced this to three categories (situation awareness, communication and teamwork, task management), each with three underlying elements. The system was called the Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. A scoring system and a user handbook were also developed.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> A prototype behavioural rating system for scrub practitioners’ non-technical skills was developed, to aid in teaching and providing formative assessment. This important aspect of performance is not currently explicitly addressed in any educational route to qualify as a scrub practitioner.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  Adverse events still occur despite ongoing efforts to reduce harm to patients. Contributory factors to adverse events are often due to limitations in clinicians’ non-technical skills (e.g. communication, situation awareness), rather than deficiencies in technical competence. We developed a behavioural rating system to provide a structured means for teaching and assessing scrub practitioners’ (i.e. nurse, technician, operating department practitioner) non-technical skills.
Method  Psychologists facilitated focus groups (n = 4) with experienced scrub practitioners (n = 16; 4 in each group) to develop a preliminary taxonomy. Focus groups reviewed lists of non-technical-skill-related behaviours that were extracted from an interview study. The focus groups labelled skill categories and elements and also provided examples of good and poor behaviours for those skills. An expert panel (n = 2 psychologists; n = 1 expert nurse) then used an iterative process to individually and collaboratively review and refine those data to produce a prototype skills taxonomy.
Results  A preliminary taxonomy containing eight non-technical skill categories with 28 underlying elements was produced. The expert panel reduced this to three categories (situation awareness, communication and teamwork, task management), each with three underlying elements. The system was called the Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. A scoring system and a user handbook were also developed.
Conclusion  A prototype behavioural rating system for scrub practitioners’ non-technical skills was developed, to aid in teaching and providing formative assessment. This important aspect of performance is not currently explicitly addressed in any educational route to qualify as a scrub practitioner.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01826.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>First trimester Down syndrome screening is less effective and the number of invasive procedures is increased in women younger than 35 years of age</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01826.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">First trimester Down syndrome screening is less effective and the number of invasive procedures is increased in women younger than 35 years of age</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sini Peuhkurinen, Paivi Laitinen, Markku Ryynanen, Jaana Marttala</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-27T20:10:22.800386-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01826.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01826.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01826.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">324</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">326</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> We evaluated the performance of first trimester screening for Down syndrome in women less than 35 years of age (study group) and in women aged 35 years or more (control group) in an unselected low-risk population.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> The study group comprised a total of 63 945 women who participated in the first trimester combined screening in public health care in Finland during the study period of 1 May 2002 to 31 December 2008. Women at the age of 35 or more (<em>n</em> = 13 004) were controls. Prevalence of Down syndrome, detection rate, false positive rate and number of invasive procedures needed to detect a single case of Down syndrome were analyzed in both groups.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The overall prevalence of Down syndrome (<em>n</em> = 73) in the study group was 1:876. The number of detected cases was 54. The detection rate was 74.0% with a false positive rate of 2.8%. Number of invasive procedures needed to detect a single case of Down syndrome was 33. In the control group, the detection rate was 87.0% with a false positive rate of 11.9%. The number of invasive procedures needed to detect a single case of Down syndrome was 15. The differences in detection rate and false positive rate were significant, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.012, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The overall detection rate given for the entire population is an overestimate for a woman younger than the age of 35, which should be taken into consideration when counselling women of that age.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Objectives  We evaluated the performance of first trimester screening for Down syndrome in women less than 35 years of age (study group) and in women aged 35 years or more (control group) in an unselected low-risk population.
Methods  The study group comprised a total of 63 945 women who participated in the first trimester combined screening in public health care in Finland during the study period of 1 May 2002 to 31 December 2008. Women at the age of 35 or more (n = 13 004) were controls. Prevalence of Down syndrome, detection rate, false positive rate and number of invasive procedures needed to detect a single case of Down syndrome were analyzed in both groups.
Results  The overall prevalence of Down syndrome (n = 73) in the study group was 1:876. The number of detected cases was 54. The detection rate was 74.0% with a false positive rate of 2.8%. Number of invasive procedures needed to detect a single case of Down syndrome was 33. In the control group, the detection rate was 87.0% with a false positive rate of 11.9%. The number of invasive procedures needed to detect a single case of Down syndrome was 15. The differences in detection rate and false positive rate were significant, P &lt; 0.012, P &lt; 0.001, respectively.
Conclusion  The overall detection rate given for the entire population is an overestimate for a woman younger than the age of 35, which should be taken into consideration when counselling women of that age.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01827.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Sustained use of a tool for lifestyle intervention implemented in primary health care: a 2-year follow-up</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01827.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sustained use of a tool for lifestyle intervention implemented in primary health care: a 2-year follow-up</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Siw Carlfjord, Malou Lindberg, Agneta Andersson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:19:42.313419-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01827.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01827.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01827.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">327</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">334</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rational, aims and objectives </b> Sustainability of new methods implemented in health care is one of the most central issues in addressing the gap between research and practice, but is seldom assessed in implementation studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a new tool for lifestyle intervention in primary health care (PHC) 2 years after the introduction, and assess if the implementation strategy used influenced sustainability.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A computer-based lifestyle intervention tool (CLT) was introduced at six PHC units in Sweden in 2008, using two implementation strategies: explicit and implicit. The main difference between the strategies was a 4-week test period followed by a decision session, included in the explicit strategy. Evaluations were performed after 6, 9 and 24 months. After 24 months, the RE-AIM framework was applied to assess and compare outcome according to strategy.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> A more positive outcome regarding <em>reach</em>, <em>effectiveness</em>, <em>adoption</em> and <em>implementation</em> in the explicit group could be almost completely attributed to one of the units. <em>Maintenance</em> was low and after 24 months, differences according to strategy were negligible.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> After 24 months, the most positive outcomes regarding all RE-AIM dimensions were found in one of the units where the explicit strategy was used. The explicit strategy per se had some effect on the dimension <em>effectiveness</em>, but was not associated with sustainability overall. Staff at the most successful unit earlier had positive expectations regarding the CLT and found it compatible with existing routines.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rational, aims and objectives  Sustainability of new methods implemented in health care is one of the most central issues in addressing the gap between research and practice, but is seldom assessed in implementation studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a new tool for lifestyle intervention in primary health care (PHC) 2 years after the introduction, and assess if the implementation strategy used influenced sustainability.
Method  A computer-based lifestyle intervention tool (CLT) was introduced at six PHC units in Sweden in 2008, using two implementation strategies: explicit and implicit. The main difference between the strategies was a 4-week test period followed by a decision session, included in the explicit strategy. Evaluations were performed after 6, 9 and 24 months. After 24 months, the RE-AIM framework was applied to assess and compare outcome according to strategy.
Results  A more positive outcome regarding reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation in the explicit group could be almost completely attributed to one of the units. Maintenance was low and after 24 months, differences according to strategy were negligible.
Conclusion  After 24 months, the most positive outcomes regarding all RE-AIM dimensions were found in one of the units where the explicit strategy was used. The explicit strategy per se had some effect on the dimension effectiveness, but was not associated with sustainability overall. Staff at the most successful unit earlier had positive expectations regarding the CLT and found it compatible with existing routines.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01829.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Development of efficiency indicators of operating room management for multi-institutional comparisons</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01829.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Development of efficiency indicators of operating room management for multi-institutional comparisons</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Masayuki Tanaka, Jason Lee, Hiroshi Ikai, Yuichi Imanaka</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:19:45.146529-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01829.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01829.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01829.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">335</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">341</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objectives </b> The efficiency of a hospital's operating room (OR) management can affect its overall profitability. However, existing indicators that assess OR management efficiency do not take into account differences in hospital size, manpower and functional characteristics, thereby rendering them unsuitable for multi-institutional comparisons. The aim of this study was to develop indicators of OR management efficiency that would take into account differences in hospital size and manpower, which may then be applied to multi-institutional comparisons.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Using administrative data from 224 hospitals in Japan from 2008 to 2010, we performed four multiple linear regression analyses at the hospital level, in which the dependent variables were the number of operations per OR per month, procedural fees per OR per month, total utilization times per OR per month and total fees per OR per month for each of the models.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The expected values of these four indicators were produced using multiple regression analysis results, adjusting for differences in hospital size and manpower, which are beyond the control of process owners' management. However, more than half of the variations in three of these four indicators were shown to be explained by differences in hospital size and manpower.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> Using the ratio of observed to expected values (OE ratio), as well as the difference between the two values (OE difference) allows hospitals to identify weaknesses in efficiency with more validity when compared to unadjusted indicators. The new indicators may support the improvement and sustainment of a high-quality health care system.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Objectives  The efficiency of a hospital's operating room (OR) management can affect its overall profitability. However, existing indicators that assess OR management efficiency do not take into account differences in hospital size, manpower and functional characteristics, thereby rendering them unsuitable for multi-institutional comparisons. The aim of this study was to develop indicators of OR management efficiency that would take into account differences in hospital size and manpower, which may then be applied to multi-institutional comparisons.
Methods  Using administrative data from 224 hospitals in Japan from 2008 to 2010, we performed four multiple linear regression analyses at the hospital level, in which the dependent variables were the number of operations per OR per month, procedural fees per OR per month, total utilization times per OR per month and total fees per OR per month for each of the models.
Results  The expected values of these four indicators were produced using multiple regression analysis results, adjusting for differences in hospital size and manpower, which are beyond the control of process owners' management. However, more than half of the variations in three of these four indicators were shown to be explained by differences in hospital size and manpower.
Conclusion  Using the ratio of observed to expected values (OE ratio), as well as the difference between the two values (OE difference) allows hospitals to identify weaknesses in efficiency with more validity when compared to unadjusted indicators. The new indicators may support the improvement and sustainment of a high-quality health care system.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01830.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Reference values for mental health assessment instruments: objectives and methods of the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01830.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reference values for mental health assessment instruments: objectives and methods of the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yvonne W. M. Schulte-van Maaren, Ingrid V. E. Carlier, Erik J. Giltay, Martijn S. van Noorden, Margot W. M. de Waal, Nic J. A. van der Wee, Frans G. Zitman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-14T20:20:23.988405-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01830.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01830.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01830.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">342</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">350</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives: </b> Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) was developed to establish the outcome of psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments through repeated assessments before, during and after treatment. Although standardization of psychiatric assessments and their reference values are essential for patient care, for various ROM instruments reference values are not available. The aim of the Leiden ROM Study is to generate reference values for 22 ROM instruments, covering generic and specific mood, anxiety and somatoform (MAS) disorders, for the general population. This article describes the extensive process of recruitment, as well as baseline characteristics of patient versus non-patient groups.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method: </b> Cross-sectional study in randomly selected participants aged 18–65 years from the Dutch population, included through general practitioners.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results: </b> Extensive demographic, psychosocial, mental health, and biological data from 1302 participants, recruited via general practitioners, were collected during a two-hour standardized assessment including observer-rated and self-report scales. These data will be compared with corresponding data from 7840 patients with psychopathology who were referred to secondary care. On-going quality control and calibration ensured maintenance of high quality during data collection.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions: </b> This reference group study for mental health assessments is the first study of this size carried out in the Netherlands. The results of this study are expected to be of value to secondary psychiatric care because they allow the indication of progress in health, treatment effect and possible termination of treatment. Additionally, the reference values can be used by primary care physicians as decision threshold for referral to specialized mental health care and vice versa.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives:  Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) was developed to establish the outcome of psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments through repeated assessments before, during and after treatment. Although standardization of psychiatric assessments and their reference values are essential for patient care, for various ROM instruments reference values are not available. The aim of the Leiden ROM Study is to generate reference values for 22 ROM instruments, covering generic and specific mood, anxiety and somatoform (MAS) disorders, for the general population. This article describes the extensive process of recruitment, as well as baseline characteristics of patient versus non-patient groups.
Method:  Cross-sectional study in randomly selected participants aged 18–65 years from the Dutch population, included through general practitioners.
Results:  Extensive demographic, psychosocial, mental health, and biological data from 1302 participants, recruited via general practitioners, were collected during a two-hour standardized assessment including observer-rated and self-report scales. These data will be compared with corresponding data from 7840 patients with psychopathology who were referred to secondary care. On-going quality control and calibration ensured maintenance of high quality during data collection.
Conclusions:  This reference group study for mental health assessments is the first study of this size carried out in the Netherlands. The results of this study are expected to be of value to secondary psychiatric care because they allow the indication of progress in health, treatment effect and possible termination of treatment. Additionally, the reference values can be used by primary care physicians as decision threshold for referral to specialized mental health care and vice versa.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01832.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Addition of time-dependent covariates to a survival model significantly improved predictions for daily risk of hospital death</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01832.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Addition of time-dependent covariates to a survival model significantly improved predictions for daily risk of hospital death</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenna Wong, Monica Taljaard, Alan J. Forster, Gabriel J. Escobar, Carl van Walraven</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-12T19:57:26.753381-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01832.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01832.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01832.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">351</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">357</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rational, aims and objectives </b> The study aims to determine the extent to which the addition of post-admission information via time-dependent covariates improved the ability of a survival model to predict the daily risk of hospital death.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> Using administrative and laboratory data from adult inpatient hospitalizations at our institution between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2009, we fit both a time-dependent and a time-fixed Cox model for hospital mortality on a randomly chosen 66% of hospitalizations. We compared the predictive performance of these models on the remaining hospitalizations.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> All comparative measures clearly indicated that the addition of time-dependent covariates improved model discrimination and prominently improved model calibration. The time-dependent model had a significantly higher concordance probability (0.879 versus 0.811) and predicted significantly closer to the number of observed deaths within all risk deciles. Over the first 32 admission days, the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were consistently above zero (average IDI of +0.0200 and average NRI of 62.7% over the first 32 days).</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> The addition of time-dependent covariates significantly improved the ability of a survival model to predict a patient's daily risk of hospital death. Researchers should consider adding time-dependent covariates when seeking to improve the performance of survival models.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rational, aims and objectives  The study aims to determine the extent to which the addition of post-admission information via time-dependent covariates improved the ability of a survival model to predict the daily risk of hospital death.
Method  Using administrative and laboratory data from adult inpatient hospitalizations at our institution between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2009, we fit both a time-dependent and a time-fixed Cox model for hospital mortality on a randomly chosen 66% of hospitalizations. We compared the predictive performance of these models on the remaining hospitalizations.
Results  All comparative measures clearly indicated that the addition of time-dependent covariates improved model discrimination and prominently improved model calibration. The time-dependent model had a significantly higher concordance probability (0.879 versus 0.811) and predicted significantly closer to the number of observed deaths within all risk deciles. Over the first 32 admission days, the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were consistently above zero (average IDI of +0.0200 and average NRI of 62.7% over the first 32 days).
Conclusions  The addition of time-dependent covariates significantly improved the ability of a survival model to predict a patient's daily risk of hospital death. Researchers should consider adding time-dependent covariates when seeking to improve the performance of survival models.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01834.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Computer programs to estimate overoptimism in measures of discrimination for predicting the risk of cardiovascular diseases</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01834.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Computer programs to estimate overoptimism in measures of discrimination for predicting the risk of cardiovascular diseases</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Haider R. Mannan, John J. McNeil</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-12T19:57:40.356991-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01834.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01834.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01834.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">358</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">362</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Development of chronic disease risk prediction models has become a growing area of research in recent years. The internal validity of such models is sometimes lower than estimated from the development sample. Overfitting or overoptimism of the developed model and/or differences between the samples are likely causes for this. For modelling of an uncommon outcome, bootstrapping for overoptimism is the preferred method for afterwards shrinking of regression coefficients and the model's discrimination and calibration for overoptimism. However, computer programs for different types of bootstrap validation are not readily available. We developed two SAS macro programs – one for the simple bootstrap that compares the discriminatory performance of the Cox proportional hazards model from the original sample in bootstrap samples; and another (which is more efficient), known as stepwise bootstrap validation, that makes the same comparison but from models developed by variable selection from bootstrap samples in the original sample. These are illustrated through an example from cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Two SAS macro programs for Cox proportional hazards model using Proc PHREG were developed for estimating overoptimism in Harrell's C and Somers' D statistics. The computer programs were applied to data on CVD incidence for a Framingham cohort that combined both the original and offspring exams. The risk factors considered were current smoking, diabetes, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and body mass index.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The degree of overoptimism in both Harrell's C and Somers' D statistics were low. Both these statistics were corrected for overoptimism by subtracting overoptimism from their observed values. Between the two bootstrap validation algorithms, the degree of overoptimism was estimated to be higher for stepwise bootstrap validation.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusion </b> The programs are very useful for evaluating the ‘overoptimism corrected’ predictive performance of Cox proportional hazards model.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background  Development of chronic disease risk prediction models has become a growing area of research in recent years. The internal validity of such models is sometimes lower than estimated from the development sample. Overfitting or overoptimism of the developed model and/or differences between the samples are likely causes for this. For modelling of an uncommon outcome, bootstrapping for overoptimism is the preferred method for afterwards shrinking of regression coefficients and the model's discrimination and calibration for overoptimism. However, computer programs for different types of bootstrap validation are not readily available. We developed two SAS macro programs – one for the simple bootstrap that compares the discriminatory performance of the Cox proportional hazards model from the original sample in bootstrap samples; and another (which is more efficient), known as stepwise bootstrap validation, that makes the same comparison but from models developed by variable selection from bootstrap samples in the original sample. These are illustrated through an example from cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction.
Methods  Two SAS macro programs for Cox proportional hazards model using Proc PHREG were developed for estimating overoptimism in Harrell's C and Somers' D statistics. The computer programs were applied to data on CVD incidence for a Framingham cohort that combined both the original and offspring exams. The risk factors considered were current smoking, diabetes, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and body mass index.
Results  The degree of overoptimism in both Harrell's C and Somers' D statistics were low. Both these statistics were corrected for overoptimism by subtracting overoptimism from their observed values. Between the two bootstrap validation algorithms, the degree of overoptimism was estimated to be higher for stepwise bootstrap validation.
Conclusion  The programs are very useful for evaluating the ‘overoptimism corrected’ predictive performance of Cox proportional hazards model.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01836.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Clinical risk management in hospitals: strategy, central coordination and dialogue as key enablers</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01836.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clinical risk management in hospitals: strategy, central coordination and dialogue as key enablers</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthias Briner, Tanja Manser, Oliver Kessler</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-12T23:29:58.147428-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01836.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01836.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01836.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">363</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">369</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Objective </b> The study aims to identify key enablers fostering clinical risk management (CRM) in hospitals to guide health care in this vital area of patient safety.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the national level in 324 Swiss hospitals in 2007–2008 to assess the relationship between key elements and systematic CRM. Therefore, a comprehensive monitoring instrument for CRM was used for the first time. Organizational factors (e.g. strategy, coordination, resources) and structural conditions (e.g. hospital size) were tested as key elements. CRM was assessed by evaluating its maturity (i.e. the level of CRM development) by 12 theoretically derived indices joining together essential aspects of CRM at the hospital level and the service level. Chi-square measures were used to analyse the relationships between organizational factors or structural conditions and maturity of CRM.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Participation in this voluntary survey was good, with CRM experts of 138 out of 324 hospitals responding (response rate 43%). Three key enablers for CRM were identified: implementing a function for central CRM coordination, assuring dialogue with and between the different hospital services, and developing strategic CRM objectives.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> This study offers, for the first time, an assessment of the maturity of hospitals' CRM and identifies key enablers related to CRM. This is a feasible first step in guiding hospitals to shape their CRM and presents a basis for future studies, for example, linking CRM to outcome data.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Objective  The study aims to identify key enablers fostering clinical risk management (CRM) in hospitals to guide health care in this vital area of patient safety.
Method  A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the national level in 324 Swiss hospitals in 2007–2008 to assess the relationship between key elements and systematic CRM. Therefore, a comprehensive monitoring instrument for CRM was used for the first time. Organizational factors (e.g. strategy, coordination, resources) and structural conditions (e.g. hospital size) were tested as key elements. CRM was assessed by evaluating its maturity (i.e. the level of CRM development) by 12 theoretically derived indices joining together essential aspects of CRM at the hospital level and the service level. Chi-square measures were used to analyse the relationships between organizational factors or structural conditions and maturity of CRM.
Results  Participation in this voluntary survey was good, with CRM experts of 138 out of 324 hospitals responding (response rate 43%). Three key enablers for CRM were identified: implementing a function for central CRM coordination, assuring dialogue with and between the different hospital services, and developing strategic CRM objectives.
Conclusions  This study offers, for the first time, an assessment of the maturity of hospitals' CRM and identifies key enablers related to CRM. This is a feasible first step in guiding hospitals to shape their CRM and presents a basis for future studies, for example, linking CRM to outcome data.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01837.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Revisiting sociotechnical systems in a case of unreported use of health information exchange system in three hospital emergency departments</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01837.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Revisiting sociotechnical systems in a case of unreported use of health information exchange system in three hospital emergency departments</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mustafa Ozkaynak, Patricia Flatley Brennan</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-15T06:45:45.740104-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01837.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01837.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01837.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">370</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">373</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Background </b> Health information exchange (HIE) allows clinicians to access patient level health care information. HIE can potentially improve patient care in emergency departments.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> We present a selected piece of evaluation of an HIE implementation in three Midwestern emergency departments. Data were collected through over 210 hours of direct observations and short interviews with 13 clinicians.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The results suggest that the usage rate of the HIE was low. Moreover, two ways of unreported use of the HIE system by clinicians was uncovered: (1) The HIE system was being used mostly for patients only with specific characteristics. (2) The information from the HIE system could be used to confront with the patients.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Discussion </b> This study provides a case of how social system may shape a HIE technology. In order to fully benefit from HIE, understanding organizational and social context during the HIE design and implementation is needed. Such an understanding will also allow us to identify and detail required additional resources and organizational interventions that will complement HIE such as a case management strategy.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Background  Health information exchange (HIE) allows clinicians to access patient level health care information. HIE can potentially improve patient care in emergency departments.
Methods  We present a selected piece of evaluation of an HIE implementation in three Midwestern emergency departments. Data were collected through over 210 hours of direct observations and short interviews with 13 clinicians.
Results  The results suggest that the usage rate of the HIE was low. Moreover, two ways of unreported use of the HIE system by clinicians was uncovered: (1) The HIE system was being used mostly for patients only with specific characteristics. (2) The information from the HIE system could be used to confront with the patients.
Discussion  This study provides a case of how social system may shape a HIE technology. In order to fully benefit from HIE, understanding organizational and social context during the HIE design and implementation is needed. Such an understanding will also allow us to identify and detail required additional resources and organizational interventions that will complement HIE such as a case management strategy.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01838.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation of current practice in a general surgery department</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01838.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation of current practice in a general surgery department</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coraline Bez, Nancy Perrottet, Tobias Zingg, En-Ling Leung Ki, Nicolas Demartines, André Pannatier</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-15T06:45:55.628112-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01838.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01838.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01838.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">374</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">378</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> There is little evidence regarding the benefit of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) outside a critical care setting. Overprescription of SUP is not devoid of risks. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for SUP in a general surgery department.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Method </b> Data collection was performed prospectively during an 8-week period on patients hospitalized in a general surgery department (58 beds) by pharmacists. Patients with a PPI prescription for the treatment of ulcers, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, oesophagitis or epigastric pain were excluded. Patients admitted twice during the study period were not reincluded. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines on SUP were used to assess the appropriateness of <em>de novo</em> PPI prescriptions.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Among 255 patients in the study, 138 (54%) received a prophylaxis with PPI, of which 86 (62%) were <em>de novo</em> PPI prescriptions. A total of 129 patients (94%) received esomeprazole (according to the hospital drug policy). The most frequent dosage was at 40 mg once daily. Use of PPI for SUP was evaluated in 67 patients. A total of 53 patients (79%) had no risk factors for SUP. Twelve and two patients had one or two risk factors, respectively. At discharge, PPI prophylaxis was continued in 33% of patients with a <em>de novo</em> PPI prescription.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> This study highlights the overuse of PPIs in non-intensive care unit patients and the inappropriate continuation of PPI prescriptions at discharge. Treatment recommendations for SUP are needed to restrict PPI use for justified indications.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  There is little evidence regarding the benefit of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) outside a critical care setting. Overprescription of SUP is not devoid of risks. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for SUP in a general surgery department.
Method  Data collection was performed prospectively during an 8-week period on patients hospitalized in a general surgery department (58 beds) by pharmacists. Patients with a PPI prescription for the treatment of ulcers, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, oesophagitis or epigastric pain were excluded. Patients admitted twice during the study period were not reincluded. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines on SUP were used to assess the appropriateness of de novo PPI prescriptions.
Results  Among 255 patients in the study, 138 (54%) received a prophylaxis with PPI, of which 86 (62%) were de novo PPI prescriptions. A total of 129 patients (94%) received esomeprazole (according to the hospital drug policy). The most frequent dosage was at 40 mg once daily. Use of PPI for SUP was evaluated in 67 patients. A total of 53 patients (79%) had no risk factors for SUP. Twelve and two patients had one or two risk factors, respectively. At discharge, PPI prophylaxis was continued in 33% of patients with a de novo PPI prescription.
Conclusions  This study highlights the overuse of PPIs in non-intensive care unit patients and the inappropriate continuation of PPI prescriptions at discharge. Treatment recommendations for SUP are needed to restrict PPI use for justified indications.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01839.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Towards an evaluation framework for information quality management (IQM) practices for health information systems – evaluation criteria for effective IQM practices</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01839.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Towards an evaluation framework for information quality management (IQM) practices for health information systems – evaluation criteria for effective IQM practices</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Siti Asma Mohammed, Maryati Mohd Yusof</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-04-15T21:31:59.49029-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01839.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01839.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01839.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">379</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">387</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Poor information quality (IQ) must be understood as a business problem rather than systems problem. In health care organization, what is required is an effective quality management that continuously manages and reviews the factors influencing IQ in health information systems (HIS) so as to achieve the desired outcomes. Hence, in order to understand the issues of information quality management (IQM) practices in health care organizations, a more holistic evaluation study should be undertaken to investigate the IQM practices in health care organizations. It is the aim of this paper to identify the significant evaluation criteria that influence the production of good IQ in HIS.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Six selected frameworks and best practices both from health informatics and information systems literature have been reviewed to identify the evaluation criteria from the perspective of human, organizational and technological factors.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> From the review, it was found that human and organization factors are of greater significance in influencing HIS IQ. Our review depicts that there is still shortage in finding a comprehensive IQM evaluation framework. Thus, the criteria from the frameworks reviewed can be used in combination for more comprehensive evaluation criteria. Integrated IQM evaluation criteria for HIS are then proposed in this study.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Poor IQ is the result of complex interdependency within sociotechnical factors in health care organization and lack of formal and structured IQM practices. Thus, a feedback mechanism such as evaluation is needed to understand the issues in depth in the future.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  Poor information quality (IQ) must be understood as a business problem rather than systems problem. In health care organization, what is required is an effective quality management that continuously manages and reviews the factors influencing IQ in health information systems (HIS) so as to achieve the desired outcomes. Hence, in order to understand the issues of information quality management (IQM) practices in health care organizations, a more holistic evaluation study should be undertaken to investigate the IQM practices in health care organizations. It is the aim of this paper to identify the significant evaluation criteria that influence the production of good IQ in HIS.
Methods  Six selected frameworks and best practices both from health informatics and information systems literature have been reviewed to identify the evaluation criteria from the perspective of human, organizational and technological factors.
Results  From the review, it was found that human and organization factors are of greater significance in influencing HIS IQ. Our review depicts that there is still shortage in finding a comprehensive IQM evaluation framework. Thus, the criteria from the frameworks reviewed can be used in combination for more comprehensive evaluation criteria. Integrated IQM evaluation criteria for HIS are then proposed in this study.
Conclusions  Poor IQ is the result of complex interdependency within sociotechnical factors in health care organization and lack of formal and structured IQM practices. Thus, a feedback mechanism such as evaluation is needed to understand the issues in depth in the future.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01840.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Evaluation of programmatic changes to an antimicrobial stewardship program with house officer feedback</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01840.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evaluation of programmatic changes to an antimicrobial stewardship program with house officer feedback</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Y. Hong, Lauren H. Epstein, Kenneth Lawrence, Lisa Davidson, Ying Taur, Lauren Nadkarni, Shira Doron</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-15T06:46:04.358402-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01840.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01840.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01840.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">388</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">392</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> A collegial relationship between prescribers and antimicrobial stewards, along with an appreciation of the importance of antimicrobial stewardship, is essential for optimal functioning of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Programmatic adjustments based on feedback may be beneficial to the success of ASPs. The objective of this study is to assess the experience of house officers with the ASP and the effect of programmatic improvements.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> A survey of house officers at an academic medical centre was conducted assessing their experience with the ASP before (2008) and after (2010) programmatic interventions were instituted.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Of 225 house officer surveys sent, we received 97 responses (88% from medical doctors). The majority indicated that ASP was either very or somewhat important in fighting antibiotic resistance (100%), improving patient care (97%), preventing medication errors (91%) and containing health care costs (89%). Ninety-one per cent indicated either a very good or good educational experience with the ASP. The ASP often reminded respondents of a patient's allergy (31%), to adjust for renal function (78%), and 38% were prevented from making a medication error. Comparing 2008 and 2010, a higher proportion of respondents in 2010 said they had a very good or good educational experience with ASP [84% versus 98%, odds ratio (OR) = 8.40, <em>P</em> = 0.022] and a lower proportion of respondents reported confusion about ASP procedures (59% versus 39%, OR = 0.43, <em>P</em> = 0.048).</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> House officer feedback resulted in ASP policy changes which improved the ASP experience.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  A collegial relationship between prescribers and antimicrobial stewards, along with an appreciation of the importance of antimicrobial stewardship, is essential for optimal functioning of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Programmatic adjustments based on feedback may be beneficial to the success of ASPs. The objective of this study is to assess the experience of house officers with the ASP and the effect of programmatic improvements.
Methods  A survey of house officers at an academic medical centre was conducted assessing their experience with the ASP before (2008) and after (2010) programmatic interventions were instituted.
Results  Of 225 house officer surveys sent, we received 97 responses (88% from medical doctors). The majority indicated that ASP was either very or somewhat important in fighting antibiotic resistance (100%), improving patient care (97%), preventing medication errors (91%) and containing health care costs (89%). Ninety-one per cent indicated either a very good or good educational experience with the ASP. The ASP often reminded respondents of a patient's allergy (31%), to adjust for renal function (78%), and 38% were prevented from making a medication error. Comparing 2008 and 2010, a higher proportion of respondents in 2010 said they had a very good or good educational experience with ASP [84% versus 98%, odds ratio (OR) = 8.40, P = 0.022] and a lower proportion of respondents reported confusion about ASP procedures (59% versus 39%, OR = 0.43, P = 0.048).
Conclusions  House officer feedback resulted in ASP policy changes which improved the ASP experience.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01842.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Quantifying judicious use of health information technology</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01842.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Quantifying judicious use of health information technology</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandro Tsang</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-15T06:47:19.683624-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01842.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01842.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01842.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">393</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">399</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives </b> Sufficient evidence suggests that health information technology (HIT) will soon become part of physician procedure. This paper poses that the outcome of using HIT is affected by the intentions of use. Note that ethical indoctrination is a crucial mechanism for monitoring physicians. Judicious and sufficient use of HIT is expected to be the prerequisite for deploying these technologies to help in delivering better care. This research paper, therefore, aims to define professional concerns and intent to use HIT, and identify their associations.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> A survey study was conducted to collect data for developing a seven-dimensional eHealth success measure. This paper focuses on deriving a structural equation model that can explain the associations among professional concerns and intent to use HIT. Statistical analyses were, therefore, only performed on the Intent to Use and Physician Attributes constructs.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> The statistical results show that altruism, autonomy, physician-patient relationship and (subconscious) autonomy significantly associate with each other at least at <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05. Only altruism shows to be a significant determinant of intent to use HIT (with <em>P</em> = 0.00005). Other professional concerns only associate with it indirectly through altruism.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> Medicine has been a science-using and compassionate practice. Medical practice including HIT use may only be reliably assessed from a sociotechnical perspective. Professional concerns show to be associated with intent to use HIT is an expected result. This research direction may contribute to deriving policies to deploy HIT for delivering better care through implementing sufficient and judicious HIT use.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale, aims and objectives  Sufficient evidence suggests that health information technology (HIT) will soon become part of physician procedure. This paper poses that the outcome of using HIT is affected by the intentions of use. Note that ethical indoctrination is a crucial mechanism for monitoring physicians. Judicious and sufficient use of HIT is expected to be the prerequisite for deploying these technologies to help in delivering better care. This research paper, therefore, aims to define professional concerns and intent to use HIT, and identify their associations.
Methods  A survey study was conducted to collect data for developing a seven-dimensional eHealth success measure. This paper focuses on deriving a structural equation model that can explain the associations among professional concerns and intent to use HIT. Statistical analyses were, therefore, only performed on the Intent to Use and Physician Attributes constructs.
Results  The statistical results show that altruism, autonomy, physician-patient relationship and (subconscious) autonomy significantly associate with each other at least at P &lt; 0.05. Only altruism shows to be a significant determinant of intent to use HIT (with P = 0.00005). Other professional concerns only associate with it indirectly through altruism.
Conclusions  Medicine has been a science-using and compassionate practice. Medical practice including HIT use may only be reliably assessed from a sociotechnical perspective. Professional concerns show to be associated with intent to use HIT is an expected result. This research direction may contribute to deriving policies to deploy HIT for delivering better care through implementing sufficient and judicious HIT use.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01845.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Marginal public health gain of screening for colorectal cancer: modelling study, based on WHO and national databases in the Nordic countries</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01845.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marginal public health gain of screening for colorectal cancer: modelling study, based on WHO and national databases in the Nordic countries</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johann A. Sigurdsson, Linn Getz, Göran Sjönell, Paula Vainiomäki, John Brodersen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-04-22T20:09:10.582675-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01845.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01845.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01845.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">400</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">407</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aims </b> To estimate the potential gain of national screening programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) by stool occult blood testing in the Nordic countries, with comparative reference to the burden of other causes of premature death.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> Implementation of national screening programmes for CRC was modelled among people 55–74 years in accordance with the 2011 Cochrane review of biannual screening, using the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for 10 years, resulting in 15% relative risk reduction in CRC deaths among all those invited [intention-to-treat; relative risk 0.85; confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.92]. Our calculations are based on the World Health Organization and national databanks on death causes (ICD-10) and the mid-year number of inhabitants in the target group. For Finland, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, we used data for 2009. For Iceland, due to the population's small size, we calculated mean mortality for the period 2005–2009.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Invitation to a CRC screening programme for 10 years could influence 0.5–0.9% (95%CI 0.4–1.2) of all deaths in the age group 65–74 years. Among the remaining 99% of premature deaths, around 50% were caused by lung cancer, other lung diseases, cardiovascular diseases and accidents, with some national variations.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions and implications </b> Establishment of a screening programme for CRC for people aged 55–74 can be expected to affect only a minor proportion of all premature deaths in the Nordic setting. From a public health perspective, prioritizing preventive strategies targeting more prevalent causes of premature death may be a superior approach.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Aims  To estimate the potential gain of national screening programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) by stool occult blood testing in the Nordic countries, with comparative reference to the burden of other causes of premature death.
Methods  Implementation of national screening programmes for CRC was modelled among people 55–74 years in accordance with the 2011 Cochrane review of biannual screening, using the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for 10 years, resulting in 15% relative risk reduction in CRC deaths among all those invited [intention-to-treat; relative risk 0.85; confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.92]. Our calculations are based on the World Health Organization and national databanks on death causes (ICD-10) and the mid-year number of inhabitants in the target group. For Finland, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, we used data for 2009. For Iceland, due to the population's small size, we calculated mean mortality for the period 2005–2009.
Results  Invitation to a CRC screening programme for 10 years could influence 0.5–0.9% (95%CI 0.4–1.2) of all deaths in the age group 65–74 years. Among the remaining 99% of premature deaths, around 50% were caused by lung cancer, other lung diseases, cardiovascular diseases and accidents, with some national variations.
Conclusions and implications  Establishment of a screening programme for CRC for people aged 55–74 can be expected to affect only a minor proportion of all premature deaths in the Nordic setting. From a public health perspective, prioritizing preventive strategies targeting more prevalent causes of premature death may be a superior approach.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01841.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effectiveness of a brief condom promotion program in reducing risky sexual behaviours among African American men</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01841.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effectiveness of a brief condom promotion program in reducing risky sexual behaviours among African American men</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen B. Kennedy, Sherry Nolen, Zhenfeng Pan, Betty Smith, Jeffrey Applewhite, Kenneth J. Vanderhoff</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-03-21T19:55:19.798451-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01841.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01841.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2012.01841.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Rapid Communication</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">408</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">413</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Rationale </b> The prevention of human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted diseases remains a significant global public health issue, especially among vulnerable populations.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Aims and objectives </b> To promote condom use skills among young urban African American men.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Methods </b> As a pilot study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted among 136 African American men aged 18–24 years recruited from urban communities in Chicago. Participants assigned to the intervention received 45–60 minutes of a one-on-one single-session condom promotion program delivered by trained facilitators while those assigned to the attention-matched comparison condition received a general health program. Longitudinally, 115 (85%) and 120 (88%) participants completed the 3-month and 6-month follow-up surveys, respectively.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Results </b> Overall, the study results indicate that positive effects were observed from baseline to 6-month follow-up for intervention participants relative to comparison condition participants for prior condom use (1.23–1.82 versus 1.34–0.97); condom use intention (2.51–3.19 versus 2.69–2.21); perceived condom availability (3.44–3.72 versus 3.42–3.38); positive reasons to use condoms (2.82–3.08 versus 2.95–1.99); favourable condom use attitude (2.41–2.69 versus 2.49–1.95); barriers to condom use (1.33–0.79 versus 1.25–1.85); and negative condom use attitude (1.45–0.66 versus 1.33–1.39), respectively.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Conclusions </b> We conclude that a brief single-session condom promotion program is effective in preventing high-risk sexual behaviours among urban young adult African American men.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Rationale  The prevention of human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted diseases remains a significant global public health issue, especially among vulnerable populations.
Aims and objectives  To promote condom use skills among young urban African American men.
Methods  As a pilot study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted among 136 African American men aged 18–24 years recruited from urban communities in Chicago. Participants assigned to the intervention received 45–60 minutes of a one-on-one single-session condom promotion program delivered by trained facilitators while those assigned to the attention-matched comparison condition received a general health program. Longitudinally, 115 (85%) and 120 (88%) participants completed the 3-month and 6-month follow-up surveys, respectively.
Results  Overall, the study results indicate that positive effects were observed from baseline to 6-month follow-up for intervention participants relative to comparison condition participants for prior condom use (1.23–1.82 versus 1.34–0.97); condom use intention (2.51–3.19 versus 2.69–2.21); perceived condom availability (3.44–3.72 versus 3.42–3.38); positive reasons to use condoms (2.82–3.08 versus 2.95–1.99); favourable condom use attitude (2.41–2.69 versus 2.49–1.95); barriers to condom use (1.33–0.79 versus 1.25–1.85); and negative condom use attitude (1.45–0.66 versus 1.33–1.39), respectively.
Conclusions  We conclude that a brief single-session condom promotion program is effective in preventing high-risk sexual behaviours among urban young adult African American men.
</description></item></rdf:RDF>