Journal of Social Philosophy Wiley Online Library : Journal of Social Philosophyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F%28ISSN%291467-9833John Wiley & Sons, Incen© Wiley Periodicals, Inc.0047-27861467-98332011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00Winter 2011424341448- CONTRIBUTORShttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01545.xCONTRIBUTORS2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01545.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01545.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01545.xivv
- Recognition of Reviewershttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01546.xRecognition of Reviewers2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01546.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01546.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01546.x341345
- High-Stakes Gambling with Unknown Outcomes: Justifying the Precautionary Principlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01538.xHigh-Stakes Gambling with Unknown Outcomes: Justifying the Precautionary PrincipleAnton PetrenkoDan McArthur2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01538.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01538.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01538.x346362
- Equality and the Significance of Coercionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01539.xEquality and the Significance of CoercionGabriel Wollner2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01539.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01539.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01539.x363381
- Perfectionism for Neutralistshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01540.xPerfectionism for NeutralistsChristopher Lowry2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01540.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01540.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01540.x382402
- Comments on Are Liberty and Equality Compatible? by Jan Narveson and James Sterbahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01541.xComments on Are Liberty and Equality Compatible? by Jan Narveson and James SterbaJohn Christman2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01541.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01541.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01541.x403415
- Commentary on Sterbahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01542.xCommentary on SterbaDouglas B. RasmussenDouglas J. Den Uyl2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01542.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01542.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01542.x416427
- Response to Christmanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01544.xResponse to ChristmanJan Narveson2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01544.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01544.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01544.x428440
- Responses to Rasmussen, Den Uyl, and Christmanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01543.xResponses to Rasmussen, Den Uyl, and ChristmanJames P. Sterba2011-12-01T00:00:00-05:00doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01543.xJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01543.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9833.2011.01543.x441448