<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/rss/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Conservation Biology</title><description> Wiley Online Library : Conservation Biology</description><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2F%28ISSN%291523-1739</link><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en</dc:language><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">© Society for Conservation Biology</dc:rights><prism:issn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">0888-8892</prism:issn><prism:eIssn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1523-1739</prism:eIssn><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-08-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><prism:coverDisplayDate xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">August 2017</prism:coverDisplayDate><prism:volume xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">31</prism:volume><prism:number xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">4</prism:number><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">739</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">961</prism:endingPage><image rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.2017.31.issue-4/asset/cover.gif?v=1&amp;s=582334731b9b24cce8c04ad9a7e08715cf59bc0c"/><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12996"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12995"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12994"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12993"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12992"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12977"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12991"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12990"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12989"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12987"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12988"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12986"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12982"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12983"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12980"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12979"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12978"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12976"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12975"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12974"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12972"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12970"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12969"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12966"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12968"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12967"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12965"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12964"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12960"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12963"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12957"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12956"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12955"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12949"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12950"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12952"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12948"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12944"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12941"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12940"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12939"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12937"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12930"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12923"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12921"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12917"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12902"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12943"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12947"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12922"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12951"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12958"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12981"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12973"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12925"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12938"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12839"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12927"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12961"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12959"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12926"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12908"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12962"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12918"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12890"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12907"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12904"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12912"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12914"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12920"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12915"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12906"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12910"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12900"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12946"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12903"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12905"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12942"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12865"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12891"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12893"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12945"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12888"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12892"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12899"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12894"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12931"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12895"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12862"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12801"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12806"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12971"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12823"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12824"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12898"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12896"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12885"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12855"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12876"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12857"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12873"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12916"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12849"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12874"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12886"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12909"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12872"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12875"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12901"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12897"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12867"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12870"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12883"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12878"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12928"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12929"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12861"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12911"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12919"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12924"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12996" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12996</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart J. Campbell, Graham J. Edgar, Rick D. Stuart-Smith, German Soler, Amanda E. Bates</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-08-04T00:50:56.302463-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12996</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12996</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12996</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Strong empirical evidence supports recovery of reef fish populations with fishery closures. In countries where full exclusion of people from fishing may be perceived as inequitable, fishing gear restrictions on non-selective and destructive gears may offer socially relevant management alternatives to build recovery of fish biomass. Even so, very few studies have statistically compared the responses of tropical reef fisheries to alternative management strategies. Here we test for the effects of fishery closures and fishing gear restrictions on tropical reef fish biomass, at the community and family level, at 1,396 underwater surveys conducted at 617 unique sites across a spatial hierarchy within 22 global marine ecoregions representing five realms. We compare total biomass across local fish assemblages, and among 20 reef fish families inside marine protected areas (MPAs) with different fishing restrictions: no-take, hook and line fishing only, several fishing gears allowed, to sites open to all fishing gears. We include a further category representing remote sites where fishing pressure is low. As expected, full fishery closures, often referred to as ‘no-take’ zones, most benefit community and family level fish biomass in comparison with restrictions on fishing gears and openly fished sites. We further find that although biomass responses to fishery closures are highly variable across families, some fishery targets (e.g., Carcharhinidae, and Lutjanidae) respond positively to multiple restrictions on fishing gears (i.e., where gears other than hook and line fishing are not permitted). Remoteness also imparts a positive influence on the response of community level fish biomass and many fish families. Our findings provide strong support for the role of fishing restrictions in building recovery of fish biomass, and indicate important interactions among fishing gear types on removal of fish biomass among a range of reef fish families.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Strong empirical evidence supports recovery of reef fish populations with fishery closures. In countries where full exclusion of people from fishing may be perceived as inequitable, fishing gear restrictions on non-selective and destructive gears may offer socially relevant management alternatives to build recovery of fish biomass. Even so, very few studies have statistically compared the responses of tropical reef fisheries to alternative management strategies. Here we test for the effects of fishery closures and fishing gear restrictions on tropical reef fish biomass, at the community and family level, at 1,396 underwater surveys conducted at 617 unique sites across a spatial hierarchy within 22 global marine ecoregions representing five realms. We compare total biomass across local fish assemblages, and among 20 reef fish families inside marine protected areas (MPAs) with different fishing restrictions: no-take, hook and line fishing only, several fishing gears allowed, to sites open to all fishing gears. We include a further category representing remote sites where fishing pressure is low. As expected, full fishery closures, often referred to as ‘no-take’ zones, most benefit community and family level fish biomass in comparison with restrictions on fishing gears and openly fished sites. We further find that although biomass responses to fishery closures are highly variable across families, some fishery targets (e.g., Carcharhinidae, and Lutjanidae) respond positively to multiple restrictions on fishing gears (i.e., where gears other than hook and line fishing are not permitted). Remoteness also imparts a positive influence on the response of community level fish biomass and many fish families. Our findings provide strong support for the role of fishing restrictions in building recovery of fish biomass, and indicate important interactions among fishing gear types on removal of fish biomass among a range of reef fish families.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12995" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum in the endemic avifauna of eastern Cuba</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12995</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum in the endemic avifauna of eastern Cuba</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Letícia Soares, Peter Marra, Lindsey Gray, Robert E. Ricklefs</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-08-02T06:55:50.448799-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12995</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12995</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12995</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Note</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Island populations are vulnerable to introduced pathogens, as evidenced by extinction or population decline of several endemic Hawaiian birds caused by the malaria parasite, <em>Plasmodium relictum</em> (order Haemosporida). We analyzed blood samples from 363 birds caught near Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, for the presence of haemosporidian infections. We characterized parasite lineages by determining nucleotide variation of the parasite's mitochondrial cyt <em>b</em> gene. Fifty-nine individuals were infected, and we identified 7 lineages of haemosporidian parasites. Fifty individuals were infected by 6 <em>Haemoproteus</em> sp. lineages, including a newly characterized lineage of <em>Haem. (Parahaemoproteus)</em> sp. CUH01. Nine individuals carried the <em>P. relictum</em> lineage GRW4, including 5 endemic Cuban Grassquits (<em>Tiaris canorus</em>) and 1 migratory Cape May Warbler (<em>Setophaga tigrina</em>). A sequence of the merozoite surface protein gene from one Cuban Grassquit infected with GRW4 matched that of the Hawaiian haplotype Pr9. Our results indicate that resident and migratory Cuban birds are infected with a malaria lineage that has severely affected populations of several endemic Hawaiian birds. We suggest GRW4 may be associated with the lack of several bird species on Cuba that are ubiquitous elsewhere in the West Indies. From the standpoint of avian conservation in the Caribbean Basin, it will be important to determine the distribution of haemosporidian parasites, especially <em>P</em>. <em>relictum</em> GRW4, in Cuba as well as the pathogenicity of this lineage in species that occur and are absent from Cuba.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Island populations are vulnerable to introduced pathogens, as evidenced by extinction or population decline of several endemic Hawaiian birds caused by the malaria parasite, Plasmodium relictum (order Haemosporida). We analyzed blood samples from 363 birds caught near Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, for the presence of haemosporidian infections. We characterized parasite lineages by determining nucleotide variation of the parasite's mitochondrial cyt b gene. Fifty-nine individuals were infected, and we identified 7 lineages of haemosporidian parasites. Fifty individuals were infected by 6 Haemoproteus sp. lineages, including a newly characterized lineage of Haem. (Parahaemoproteus) sp. CUH01. Nine individuals carried the P. relictum lineage GRW4, including 5 endemic Cuban Grassquits (Tiaris canorus) and 1 migratory Cape May Warbler (Setophaga tigrina). A sequence of the merozoite surface protein gene from one Cuban Grassquit infected with GRW4 matched that of the Hawaiian haplotype Pr9. Our results indicate that resident and migratory Cuban birds are infected with a malaria lineage that has severely affected populations of several endemic Hawaiian birds. We suggest GRW4 may be associated with the lack of several bird species on Cuba that are ubiquitous elsewhere in the West Indies. From the standpoint of avian conservation in the Caribbean Basin, it will be important to determine the distribution of haemosporidian parasites, especially P. relictum GRW4, in Cuba as well as the pathogenicity of this lineage in species that occur and are absent from Cuba.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12994" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The role of social license in conservation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12994</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The role of social license in conservation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Kendal, Rebecca M. Ford</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-08-02T02:21:09.77476-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12994</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12994</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12994</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Diversity</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>“Threatened species programs need a social license to justify public funding” (Zander et al. 2014). Or do they? There is growing acceptance within conservation science that community support for and engagement in ecosystem management programs is likely to lead to better conservation outcomes (Marvier &amp; Wong 2012). However, the language used to characterize relations between conservation and the community is important, and use of the term <em>social license</em> may not always be a useful way to describe this relationship. Since the mid-1990s, the term <em>social license</em> has been widely used in the mining sector to describe implicit acceptance and approval of a mining operation by the community in which it operates (Lacey &amp; Lamont 2014). Other industries such as forestry, aquaculture, and agriculture have begun using the term in a similar way (Edwards &amp; Trafford 2016; Ford &amp; Williams 2016; Moffat et al. 2016). Now <em>social license</em> is beginning to appear in conservation discourse (e.g., Garnett et al., 2015; Oakes et al., 2015). At the same time, the use of <em>social license</em> in other sectors has been criticized (e.g., Owen &amp; Kemp, 2013) because it frames relationships with communities as more singular, binary, and tangible than is feasible or desirable (Parsons &amp; Moffat 2014). The use of <em>social license</em> in conservation needs critical evaluation, particularly given the broad contextual differences between conservation and industries such as mining.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

“Threatened species programs need a social license to justify public funding” (Zander et al. 2014). Or do they? There is growing acceptance within conservation science that community support for and engagement in ecosystem management programs is likely to lead to better conservation outcomes (Marvier &amp; Wong 2012). However, the language used to characterize relations between conservation and the community is important, and use of the term social license may not always be a useful way to describe this relationship. Since the mid-1990s, the term social license has been widely used in the mining sector to describe implicit acceptance and approval of a mining operation by the community in which it operates (Lacey &amp; Lamont 2014). Other industries such as forestry, aquaculture, and agriculture have begun using the term in a similar way (Edwards &amp; Trafford 2016; Ford &amp; Williams 2016; Moffat et al. 2016). Now social license is beginning to appear in conservation discourse (e.g., Garnett et al., 2015; Oakes et al., 2015). At the same time, the use of social license in other sectors has been criticized (e.g., Owen &amp; Kemp, 2013) because it frames relationships with communities as more singular, binary, and tangible than is feasible or desirable (Parsons &amp; Moffat 2014). The use of social license in conservation needs critical evaluation, particularly given the broad contextual differences between conservation and industries such as mining.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12993" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Major shifts in amazon wildlife populations from recent climatic intensification</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12993</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Major shifts in amazon wildlife populations from recent climatic intensification</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bodmer, Pedro Mayor, Miguel Antunez, Kimberlyn Chota, Tula Fang, Pablo Puertas, Marlini Pittet, Maire Kirkland, Mike Walkey, Claudia Rios, Pedro Perez-Peña, Peter Henderson, William Bodmer, Andy Bicerra, Joseph Zegarra, Emma Docherty</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-08-02T01:21:01.830566-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12993</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12993</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12993</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the western Amazon basin, recent intensification of river level cycles has increased flooding during the wet seasons and decreased precipitation during the dry season. Greater than normal floods occurred in 2009 and in all years from 2011–2015 during high water seasons, and a drought occurred during the 2010 low water season. During these years, we surveyed populations of terrestrial, arboreal and aquatic wildlife in a seasonally flooded Amazonian forest to study the consequences of intensification of climatic fluctuations to wildlife populations and in turn resource use by traditional people. Intensive floods and droughts have recently resulted in shifts in fish and terrestrial mammal populations in flooded forests, a major landscape in western Amazonia that make up 99,780 km<sup>2</sup> of the Loreto region in Peru. The intensive floods caused terrestrial mammal populations to decrease by 95% with ungulates, terrestrial rodents and terrestrial edentates having increased mortality because they were forced onto small patches of land during peak flood pulses, and drowning during the historically high floods of 2012 and 2015. In contrast, fish increased and benefited from longer access to inundated forests, resulting in healthy populations of waterfowl, dolphins, otters and caimans. Arboreal species, including, macaws, game birds, primates, felids and other arboreal mammals had stable populations and were not affected directly by high floods. The drought of 2010 had the opposite consequences with decreases in fish, waterfowl and dolphin populations, and stable populations of terrestrial and arboreal species. Ungulates and large rodents are important wildmeat species for local people and their dramatic decline has shifted resource use of people living in the flooded forests with less reliance on hunting and greater use of fish.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

In the western Amazon basin, recent intensification of river level cycles has increased flooding during the wet seasons and decreased precipitation during the dry season. Greater than normal floods occurred in 2009 and in all years from 2011–2015 during high water seasons, and a drought occurred during the 2010 low water season. During these years, we surveyed populations of terrestrial, arboreal and aquatic wildlife in a seasonally flooded Amazonian forest to study the consequences of intensification of climatic fluctuations to wildlife populations and in turn resource use by traditional people. Intensive floods and droughts have recently resulted in shifts in fish and terrestrial mammal populations in flooded forests, a major landscape in western Amazonia that make up 99,780 km2 of the Loreto region in Peru. The intensive floods caused terrestrial mammal populations to decrease by 95% with ungulates, terrestrial rodents and terrestrial edentates having increased mortality because they were forced onto small patches of land during peak flood pulses, and drowning during the historically high floods of 2012 and 2015. In contrast, fish increased and benefited from longer access to inundated forests, resulting in healthy populations of waterfowl, dolphins, otters and caimans. Arboreal species, including, macaws, game birds, primates, felids and other arboreal mammals had stable populations and were not affected directly by high floods. The drought of 2010 had the opposite consequences with decreases in fish, waterfowl and dolphin populations, and stable populations of terrestrial and arboreal species. Ungulates and large rodents are important wildmeat species for local people and their dramatic decline has shifted resource use of people living in the flooded forests with less reliance on hunting and greater use of fish.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12992" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Managing conflicts between economic activities and threatened migratory marine species toward creating a multiobjective blue economy</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12992</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Managing conflicts between economic activities and threatened migratory marine species toward creating a multiobjective blue economy</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linda R. Harris, Ronel Nel, Herman Oosthuizen, Mike Meyer, Deon Kotze, Darrell Anders, Steven McCue, Santosh Bachoo</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-08-02T01:20:58.631847-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12992</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12992</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12992</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Harnessing the economic potential of the oceans is key to combating poverty, enhancing food security, and strengthening economies. But the concomitant risk of intensified resource extraction to migratory species is worrying given that these species contribute to important ecological processes, often underpin alternatively livelihoods, and many are already threatened. We thus sought to quantify the potential conflict between key economic activities (five fisheries and hydrocarbon exploitation) and sea turtle migration corridors in a region with rapid economic development: Southern and East Africa. From 20 loggerhead and 14 leatherback tracks, we used movement-based kernel density estimation to identify three migration corridors for each of the two species. We overlaid these corridors on maps of the distribution and intensity of economic activities, quantified the extent of overlap and threat posed by each activity on each species, and compared the effects. These results were compared to annual bycatch rates in the respective fisheries. Both species’ corridors overlap most with longlining, but the effect is worse for leatherbacks: bycatch rates are substantial (ca. 1500 per annum) relative to the regional population size (&lt;100 females nesting per annum), likely slowing the population growth rate. Artisanal fisheries are of greater concern for loggerheads, but the population appears to be withstanding the high bycatch rates because it is increasing exponentially. The hydrocarbon industry currently has a moderately low impact, but exploitation in key areas (e.g., Southern Mozambique) has the potential to undermine more than 50 years of conservation efforts, affecting &gt;80% of the loggerhead population, 33% of the (critically endangered) leatherback population, and their nesting beaches. We support establishing blue economies, but oceans need to be carefully zoned and responsibly managed in both space and time to achieve economic (resource extraction), ecological (conservation, maintain processes) and social (maintain alternative livelihood opportunities, combat poverty) objectives.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Harnessing the economic potential of the oceans is key to combating poverty, enhancing food security, and strengthening economies. But the concomitant risk of intensified resource extraction to migratory species is worrying given that these species contribute to important ecological processes, often underpin alternatively livelihoods, and many are already threatened. We thus sought to quantify the potential conflict between key economic activities (five fisheries and hydrocarbon exploitation) and sea turtle migration corridors in a region with rapid economic development: Southern and East Africa. From 20 loggerhead and 14 leatherback tracks, we used movement-based kernel density estimation to identify three migration corridors for each of the two species. We overlaid these corridors on maps of the distribution and intensity of economic activities, quantified the extent of overlap and threat posed by each activity on each species, and compared the effects. These results were compared to annual bycatch rates in the respective fisheries. Both species’ corridors overlap most with longlining, but the effect is worse for leatherbacks: bycatch rates are substantial (ca. 1500 per annum) relative to the regional population size (&lt;100 females nesting per annum), likely slowing the population growth rate. Artisanal fisheries are of greater concern for loggerheads, but the population appears to be withstanding the high bycatch rates because it is increasing exponentially. The hydrocarbon industry currently has a moderately low impact, but exploitation in key areas (e.g., Southern Mozambique) has the potential to undermine more than 50 years of conservation efforts, affecting &gt;80% of the loggerhead population, 33% of the (critically endangered) leatherback population, and their nesting beaches. We support establishing blue economies, but oceans need to be carefully zoned and responsibly managed in both space and time to achieve economic (resource extraction), ecological (conservation, maintain processes) and social (maintain alternative livelihood opportunities, combat poverty) objectives.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12977" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Matches and mismatches between conservation investments and biodiversity values in the European Union</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12977</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matches and mismatches between conservation investments and biodiversity values in the European Union</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Sánchez-Fernández, Pedro Abellán, Pedro Aragón, Sara Varela, Mar Cabeza</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-28T22:50:41.243721-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12977</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12977</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12977</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Recently, the European Commission adopted a new strategy to halt the loss of biodiversity. Member states are expected to favour a more effective collection and redistribution of European Union (EU) funds under the current Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014–2020. Because of the large spatial variation in the distribution of biodiversity and conservation needs at the continental scale, EU instruments should ensure that countries with higher biodiversity values get more funds and resources for the conservation of this biodiversity than other countries. We assess the association between conservation investments and biodiversity values across the member states, accounting for a variety of conservation investment indicators, taxonomic groups (including groups of plants, vertebrates and invertebrates) and biodiversity value indicators. In general, we have found good overall associations between conservation investments and biodiversity variables. However, some mismatches were found in countries receiving more (or less) investments than expected based on their biodiversity values. We also found that the extensive use of birds as unique indicators of conservation effectiveness may be misleading. These results can provide insight to policymakers to aid future decisions regarding funding allocation, allowing a better redistribution of EU funds.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Recently, the European Commission adopted a new strategy to halt the loss of biodiversity. Member states are expected to favour a more effective collection and redistribution of European Union (EU) funds under the current Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014–2020. Because of the large spatial variation in the distribution of biodiversity and conservation needs at the continental scale, EU instruments should ensure that countries with higher biodiversity values get more funds and resources for the conservation of this biodiversity than other countries. We assess the association between conservation investments and biodiversity values across the member states, accounting for a variety of conservation investment indicators, taxonomic groups (including groups of plants, vertebrates and invertebrates) and biodiversity value indicators. In general, we have found good overall associations between conservation investments and biodiversity variables. However, some mismatches were found in countries receiving more (or less) investments than expected based on their biodiversity values. We also found that the extensive use of birds as unique indicators of conservation effectiveness may be misleading. These results can provide insight to policymakers to aid future decisions regarding funding allocation, allowing a better redistribution of EU funds.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12991" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12991</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew J. Hardy, James A. Fitzsimons, Sarah A. Bekessy, Ascelin Gordon</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-20T03:51:12.993521-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12991</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12991</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12991</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Practice and Policy</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is a challenge for many conservation organizations. In a number of countries, organizations use ‘revolving fund’ programs, whereby land is purchased, and then on-sold to conservation-minded owners with a condition to enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The proceeds from sale are then used to purchase, protect and on-sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. As the effectiveness of this approach relies upon selecting the right properties, we sought to explore the factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision-making. We conducted exploratory, semi-structured interviews with managers from each of the five major revolving funds in Australia. Responses suggest that whilst conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential, with a major determinant being whether the property can be on-sold within a reasonable timeframe, and at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate the on-sale process, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners are faced with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity and other factors in selecting properties; and three main potential risks: difficulty recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; difficulty on-selling the property; and difficulty meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest that the complexity of these decisions may be limiting revolving fund effectiveness. We draw from participant responses to identify potential strategies to mitigate the risks identified, and suggest that managers could benefit from a shared learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners are dealing with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps to identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is a challenge for many conservation organizations. In a number of countries, organizations use ‘revolving fund’ programs, whereby land is purchased, and then on-sold to conservation-minded owners with a condition to enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The proceeds from sale are then used to purchase, protect and on-sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. As the effectiveness of this approach relies upon selecting the right properties, we sought to explore the factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision-making. We conducted exploratory, semi-structured interviews with managers from each of the five major revolving funds in Australia. Responses suggest that whilst conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential, with a major determinant being whether the property can be on-sold within a reasonable timeframe, and at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate the on-sale process, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners are faced with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity and other factors in selecting properties; and three main potential risks: difficulty recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; difficulty on-selling the property; and difficulty meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest that the complexity of these decisions may be limiting revolving fund effectiveness. We draw from participant responses to identify potential strategies to mitigate the risks identified, and suggest that managers could benefit from a shared learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners are dealing with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps to identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12990" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Countering resistance to protected-area extension</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12990</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Countering resistance to protected-area extension</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Lindenmayer, Simon Thorn, Reed Noss</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-19T06:23:07.528449-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12990</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12990</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12990</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The establishment of protected areas is a critical strategy for conserving biodiversity. Key policy directives like the Aichi targets seek to expand protected areas to 17% of the earth's land surface, with calls by some conservation biologists for much more. However, in places such as the USA, Germany and Australia, attempts to increase protected areas are meeting strong resistance from communities, industry groups, and governments. Here we provide case studies of such resistance and suggest four ways to tackle this problem: <b>(1)</b> Broaden the case for protected areas beyond just nature conservation, to include the economic, human health, and other benefits, and translate these into a persuasive business case for protected areas. <b>(2)</b> Better communicate the conservation values of protected areas. This should include highlighting how many species, communities, and ecosystems have been conserved by protected areas and also the counterfactual – what would have been lost without protected area establishment. <b>(3)</b> Consider zoning of activities to ensure the maintenance of effective management. And, <b>(4)</b> Remind citizens to think about conservation when they vote, including holding politicians accountable for their environmental promises. Without tackling resistance to expanding the protected estate, it will be impossible to reach conservation targets and this will undermine attempts to stem the global extinction crisis.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The establishment of protected areas is a critical strategy for conserving biodiversity. Key policy directives like the Aichi targets seek to expand protected areas to 17% of the earth's land surface, with calls by some conservation biologists for much more. However, in places such as the USA, Germany and Australia, attempts to increase protected areas are meeting strong resistance from communities, industry groups, and governments. Here we provide case studies of such resistance and suggest four ways to tackle this problem: (1) Broaden the case for protected areas beyond just nature conservation, to include the economic, human health, and other benefits, and translate these into a persuasive business case for protected areas. (2) Better communicate the conservation values of protected areas. This should include highlighting how many species, communities, and ecosystems have been conserved by protected areas and also the counterfactual – what would have been lost without protected area establishment. (3) Consider zoning of activities to ensure the maintenance of effective management. And, (4) Remind citizens to think about conservation when they vote, including holding politicians accountable for their environmental promises. Without tackling resistance to expanding the protected estate, it will be impossible to reach conservation targets and this will undermine attempts to stem the global extinction crisis.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12989" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12989</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lauric Thiault, Paul Marshall, Stefan Gelcich, Antoine Collin, Frédérique Chlous, Joachim Claudet</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-17T07:20:29.786055-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12989</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12989</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12989</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>An overarching challenge of natural resource management and biodiversity conservation is that relationships between human and nature are difficult to integrate into tools that can effectively guide decision-making. Social-ecological vulnerability offers a valuable framework for identifying and understanding important social-ecological linkages, and the implications of dependencies and other feedback loops in the system. Unfortunately its implementation at local scales has hitherto been limited, due at least in part to the lack of operational tools for spatial representation of social-ecological vulnerability. Here, we develop a method and demonstrate its utility for mapping social-ecological vulnerability using information on human-nature dependencies and ecosystem services at local scales within the context of the small-scale fishery of Moorea, French Polynesia. Our approach produced a spatial analysis that reveals social-ecological vulnerability hotspots that highlight focal areas for management intervention. The results can also inform decisions about where biodiversity conservation strategies are likely to be more effective, and how social impacts from policy decisions can be minimized. This study provides a new perspective on human-nature linkages that can inform efforts to manage for sustainability at local scales. Our approach delivers insights that are distinct from those provided by the emphasis on a single vulnerability component (e.g., exposure), and demonstrates the feasibility and value of operationalizing the social-ecological vulnerability framework for policy, planning and participatory management decisions.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

An overarching challenge of natural resource management and biodiversity conservation is that relationships between human and nature are difficult to integrate into tools that can effectively guide decision-making. Social-ecological vulnerability offers a valuable framework for identifying and understanding important social-ecological linkages, and the implications of dependencies and other feedback loops in the system. Unfortunately its implementation at local scales has hitherto been limited, due at least in part to the lack of operational tools for spatial representation of social-ecological vulnerability. Here, we develop a method and demonstrate its utility for mapping social-ecological vulnerability using information on human-nature dependencies and ecosystem services at local scales within the context of the small-scale fishery of Moorea, French Polynesia. Our approach produced a spatial analysis that reveals social-ecological vulnerability hotspots that highlight focal areas for management intervention. The results can also inform decisions about where biodiversity conservation strategies are likely to be more effective, and how social impacts from policy decisions can be minimized. This study provides a new perspective on human-nature linkages that can inform efforts to manage for sustainability at local scales. Our approach delivers insights that are distinct from those provided by the emphasis on a single vulnerability component (e.g., exposure), and demonstrates the feasibility and value of operationalizing the social-ecological vulnerability framework for policy, planning and participatory management decisions.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12987" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Expanding career pathways in conservation science</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12987</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Expanding career pathways in conservation science</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erika Zavaleta, Clare Aslan, Wendy Palen, Tom Sisk, Maureen E. Ryan, Brett Dickson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-13T03:50:57.874008-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12987</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12987</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12987</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Diversity</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Since its inception, conservation biology has inspired thousands of students, spurred the creation of new initiatives, organizations and agencies, and informed conservation efforts worldwide. Nevertheless, global biodiversity loss is accelerating (Butchart et al. 2010), and our field needs to change to keep pace with mounting challenges. Conservation would benefit if scientists more enthusiastically pushed the institutional boundaries of our field through their efforts to expand their own and others’ career options and professional opportunities. We discuss several key areas of expansion, a critical subset of a longer list of comprehensive solutions. We aim to spark productive conversation and self-reflection to galvanize individual and institutional change in our field.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Since its inception, conservation biology has inspired thousands of students, spurred the creation of new initiatives, organizations and agencies, and informed conservation efforts worldwide. Nevertheless, global biodiversity loss is accelerating (Butchart et al. 2010), and our field needs to change to keep pace with mounting challenges. Conservation would benefit if scientists more enthusiastically pushed the institutional boundaries of our field through their efforts to expand their own and others’ career options and professional opportunities. We discuss several key areas of expansion, a critical subset of a longer list of comprehensive solutions. We aim to spark productive conversation and self-reflection to galvanize individual and institutional change in our field.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12988" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Scaling range sizes to threats for robust predictions of risks to biodiversity</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12988</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scaling range sizes to threats for robust predictions of risks to biodiversity</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David A. Keith, H. Resit Akçakaya, Nicholas J. Murray</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-13T03:50:51.839496-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12988</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12988</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12988</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Assessments of risk to biodiversity often rely on spatial distributions of species and ecosystems. Range size metrics used extensively in these assessments, such as Area of Occupancy (AOO), are sensitive to measurement scale, prompting proposals to measure them at finer scales, or a variery of different scales based on the shape of the distribution or ecological characteristics of the biota. Despite its dominant role in Red List assessments for decades, appropriate spatial scales of AOO for predicting risks of species extinction or ecosystem collapse remain untested and contentious. There are no quantitative evaluations of the scale-sensitivity of AOO as a predictor of risks, the relationship between optimal AOO scale and threat scale, or the effect of grid uncertainty. Here we present new empirical evidence that AOO is a good predictor of risk and performs optimally when measured with grid cells 0.1–1 times the area of the largest plausible threat event. Contrary to previous assertions, finer scale estimates resulted in lower predictive performance; the optimal scale depends on the spatial scales of threats more than the shape or size of biotic distributions. Although we show appreciable potential for grid measurement errors, current IUCN guidelines for estimating AOO neutralize geometric uncertainty and incorporate effective scaling procedures for assessing risks posed by landscape-scale threats to species and ecosystems.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Assessments of risk to biodiversity often rely on spatial distributions of species and ecosystems. Range size metrics used extensively in these assessments, such as Area of Occupancy (AOO), are sensitive to measurement scale, prompting proposals to measure them at finer scales, or a variery of different scales based on the shape of the distribution or ecological characteristics of the biota. Despite its dominant role in Red List assessments for decades, appropriate spatial scales of AOO for predicting risks of species extinction or ecosystem collapse remain untested and contentious. There are no quantitative evaluations of the scale-sensitivity of AOO as a predictor of risks, the relationship between optimal AOO scale and threat scale, or the effect of grid uncertainty. Here we present new empirical evidence that AOO is a good predictor of risk and performs optimally when measured with grid cells 0.1–1 times the area of the largest plausible threat event. Contrary to previous assertions, finer scale estimates resulted in lower predictive performance; the optimal scale depends on the spatial scales of threats more than the shape or size of biotic distributions. Although we show appreciable potential for grid measurement errors, current IUCN guidelines for estimating AOO neutralize geometric uncertainty and incorporate effective scaling procedures for assessing risks posed by landscape-scale threats to species and ecosystems.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12986" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effectiveness of protected areas for vertebrates based on taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12986</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effectiveness of protected areas for vertebrates based on taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Qing Quan, Xianli Che, Yongjie Wu, Yuchun Wu, Qiang Zhang, Min Zhang, Fasheng Zou</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-13T03:50:21.021571-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12986</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12986</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12986</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Establishing protected areas is the primary goal and tool for preventing irreversible biodiversity loss. However, the effectiveness of protected areas that target specific species has been questioned for some time, because targeting key species for conservation may impair the integral regional pool of species diversity and phylogenetic and functional diversity are seldom considered. We first assessed the efficacy of protected areas in China for the conservation of phylogenetic diversity using the ranges and phylogenies of 2279 terrestrial vertebrates. We found a strong positive correlation between phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity, and only 12.1%–43.8% of the priority areas are currently covered by protected areas. However, the patterns and coverage of phylogenetic diversity were affected when weighted by species richness. These results indicate that overall in China, protected areas targeting high species richness protected total phylogenetic diversity well, but failed to do so in some regions with more unique and/or threatened communities. For instance, the coastal areas of Eastern China where there are severely threatened avian communities were less protected. Our results suggest that the distributions of the currently protected areas still have room for improvement although most of the areas protect both taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Establishing protected areas is the primary goal and tool for preventing irreversible biodiversity loss. However, the effectiveness of protected areas that target specific species has been questioned for some time, because targeting key species for conservation may impair the integral regional pool of species diversity and phylogenetic and functional diversity are seldom considered. We first assessed the efficacy of protected areas in China for the conservation of phylogenetic diversity using the ranges and phylogenies of 2279 terrestrial vertebrates. We found a strong positive correlation between phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity, and only 12.1%–43.8% of the priority areas are currently covered by protected areas. However, the patterns and coverage of phylogenetic diversity were affected when weighted by species richness. These results indicate that overall in China, protected areas targeting high species richness protected total phylogenetic diversity well, but failed to do so in some regions with more unique and/or threatened communities. For instance, the coastal areas of Eastern China where there are severely threatened avian communities were less protected. Our results suggest that the distributions of the currently protected areas still have room for improvement although most of the areas protect both taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12982" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Developing an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral community of practice in the domain of forests and livelihoods</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12982</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Developing an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral community of practice in the domain of forests and livelihoods</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cristy Watkins, Jennifer Zavaleta, Sarah Wilson, Scott Francisco</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-07T07:21:16.538477-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12982</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12982</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12982</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although significant resources are being spent researching and fostering the relationship between forests and livelihoods to promote mutually beneficial outcomes, critical gaps in our understanding persist. A core reason for such gaps is that researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers lack the structured space to interact and collaborate, which is essential for effective, interdisciplinary research, practice, and evaluation. Thus, scientific findings, policy recommendations, and measured outcomes have not always been synthesized into deep, systemic understanding; learning from practice and implementation does not easily find its way into scientific analyses­­; and science often fails to influence policy. Communities of practice (CofPs) are dynamic sociocultural systems that bring people together to share and create knowledge around a common topic of interest. CofPs offer participants a space and structure suited to developing new, systemic approaches to multi-dimensional problems around a common theme. Uniquely informed by a systems thinking perspective, and drawing from the scientific and grey literatures and in-depth interviews with representatives of established CofPs in the natural resource management and development domain, we argue that a well-designed and adequately-funded CofP can facilitate interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral relationships and knowledge exchange. Well-designed CofPs integrate a set of core features and processes in order to enhance individual, collective, and domain outcomes; they set out an initial but evolving purpose, encourage diverse leadership, and promote the development of collective identity development. Funding facilitates ideal, effective communication strategies (e.g. face-to-face engagement). This essay is, therefore, a call to colleagues across sectors and disciplines to take advantage of CofPs to advance the domain of forests and livelihoods.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Although significant resources are being spent researching and fostering the relationship between forests and livelihoods to promote mutually beneficial outcomes, critical gaps in our understanding persist. A core reason for such gaps is that researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers lack the structured space to interact and collaborate, which is essential for effective, interdisciplinary research, practice, and evaluation. Thus, scientific findings, policy recommendations, and measured outcomes have not always been synthesized into deep, systemic understanding; learning from practice and implementation does not easily find its way into scientific analyses­­; and science often fails to influence policy. Communities of practice (CofPs) are dynamic sociocultural systems that bring people together to share and create knowledge around a common topic of interest. CofPs offer participants a space and structure suited to developing new, systemic approaches to multi-dimensional problems around a common theme. Uniquely informed by a systems thinking perspective, and drawing from the scientific and grey literatures and in-depth interviews with representatives of established CofPs in the natural resource management and development domain, we argue that a well-designed and adequately-funded CofP can facilitate interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral relationships and knowledge exchange. Well-designed CofPs integrate a set of core features and processes in order to enhance individual, collective, and domain outcomes; they set out an initial but evolving purpose, encourage diverse leadership, and promote the development of collective identity development. Funding facilitates ideal, effective communication strategies (e.g. face-to-face engagement). This essay is, therefore, a call to colleagues across sectors and disciplines to take advantage of CofPs to advance the domain of forests and livelihoods.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12983" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Bird community responses to habitat creation in a long-term, large-scale natural experiment</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12983</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bird community responses to habitat creation in a long-term, large-scale natural experiment</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robin C. Whytock, Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor, Kevin Watts, Patanjaly Barbosa De Andrade, Rory Whytock, Paul French, Nicholas Macgregor, Kirsty J. Park</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-07T07:20:49.504761-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12983</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12983</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12983</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Ecosystem function and resilience are compromised when habitats become fragmented due to land-use change. This has led to national and international conservation strategies aimed at restoring habitat extent and improving functional connectivity (i.e. maintaining dispersal processes). However, biodiversity responses to landscape-scale habitat creation and the relative importance of spatial and temporal scales is poorly understood, and there is disagreement over which conservation strategies should be prioritised. Addressing these knowledge gaps has been challenging because (1) there can be a significant time lag between habitat creation and biodiversity responses, and (2) many taxa respond to landscape characteristics over large spatial scales. These conditions can be difficult to replicate in a controlled setting but can be simulated using ‘natural’ experiments. Here, we used 160 years of historic post-agricultural woodland creation as a natural experiment to evaluate biodiversity responses to landscape-scale habitat creation. Specifically, we disentangle the direct and indirect relationships between bird abundance and diversity, ecological continuity, patch characteristics and landscape structure, and quantify the relative importance of local and landscape scales. Results suggest that ecological continuity has an indirect effect on total bird species richness through its direct effects on stand structure. However, for functional groups most closely associated with woodland habitats, ecological continuity had little influence. This was probably because woodlands were rapidly colonised by woodland generalists in &lt; 10 years (the minimum patch age), but were on average too young (median 50 years) to be colonised by woodland specialists. Local, patch characteristics were relatively more important than landscape characteristics. We conclude that biodiversity responses to habitat creation are dependent on local and landscape-scale factors that interact across time and space. We also suggest that knowledge gained from studies of habitat fragmentation/loss should be used to inform habitat creation with caution, since the two are not necessarily reciprocal.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Ecosystem function and resilience are compromised when habitats become fragmented due to land-use change. This has led to national and international conservation strategies aimed at restoring habitat extent and improving functional connectivity (i.e. maintaining dispersal processes). However, biodiversity responses to landscape-scale habitat creation and the relative importance of spatial and temporal scales is poorly understood, and there is disagreement over which conservation strategies should be prioritised. Addressing these knowledge gaps has been challenging because (1) there can be a significant time lag between habitat creation and biodiversity responses, and (2) many taxa respond to landscape characteristics over large spatial scales. These conditions can be difficult to replicate in a controlled setting but can be simulated using ‘natural’ experiments. Here, we used 160 years of historic post-agricultural woodland creation as a natural experiment to evaluate biodiversity responses to landscape-scale habitat creation. Specifically, we disentangle the direct and indirect relationships between bird abundance and diversity, ecological continuity, patch characteristics and landscape structure, and quantify the relative importance of local and landscape scales. Results suggest that ecological continuity has an indirect effect on total bird species richness through its direct effects on stand structure. However, for functional groups most closely associated with woodland habitats, ecological continuity had little influence. This was probably because woodlands were rapidly colonised by woodland generalists in &lt; 10 years (the minimum patch age), but were on average too young (median 50 years) to be colonised by woodland specialists. Local, patch characteristics were relatively more important than landscape characteristics. We conclude that biodiversity responses to habitat creation are dependent on local and landscape-scale factors that interact across time and space. We also suggest that knowledge gained from studies of habitat fragmentation/loss should be used to inform habitat creation with caution, since the two are not necessarily reciprocal.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12980" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Redistribution of benefits but not defection in a fisheries bycatch-reduction management initiative</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12980</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Redistribution of benefits but not defection in a fisheries bycatch-reduction management initiative</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T.R. McClanahan, J.K. Kosgei</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-05T07:43:02.424053-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12980</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12980</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12980</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Reducing the capture of small fish, discards, and by-catch is a primary concern of fisheries mangers that propose to maintain high yields, species diversity, and associated ecosystem functions. Modified fishing gear is one of the primary ways to reduce by-catch and capture of small fish. The outcomes of gear modification may depend on <b>c</b>ompetition with other gears using similar fishing grounds and resources and the subsequent adoption or defection of fishers using modified gears. We evaluated the adoption, size, catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE), yield, and income responses among gears in a coral reef fishery where a 3-cm escape gap was introduced into traditional traps. The size of fish increased in the modified traps but the catch of smaller fish increased among the other competing gears. Additionally, there was no change in the overall CPUE, yields, or per area incomes but rather redistributions of yield benefits towards the competing gears. For example, estimated incomes of fishers that adopted the traps remained unchanged but increased for net and spear fishers. Fishers using escape-gap traps had a high proportion of income from larger fish, which may have led to a perception of benefits, high status, and no defections. The less polarizing neutral-win rather than a strong loss-win tradeoff outcome may explain the full adoption of escape-gap traps 3 years after their introduction. Trap fishers showed an interest in negotiating other management improvements, such as increased mesh sizes for nets, which could ultimately lead to catalyzing community-level decisions that would increase their own profits.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Reducing the capture of small fish, discards, and by-catch is a primary concern of fisheries mangers that propose to maintain high yields, species diversity, and associated ecosystem functions. Modified fishing gear is one of the primary ways to reduce by-catch and capture of small fish. The outcomes of gear modification may depend on competition with other gears using similar fishing grounds and resources and the subsequent adoption or defection of fishers using modified gears. We evaluated the adoption, size, catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE), yield, and income responses among gears in a coral reef fishery where a 3-cm escape gap was introduced into traditional traps. The size of fish increased in the modified traps but the catch of smaller fish increased among the other competing gears. Additionally, there was no change in the overall CPUE, yields, or per area incomes but rather redistributions of yield benefits towards the competing gears. For example, estimated incomes of fishers that adopted the traps remained unchanged but increased for net and spear fishers. Fishers using escape-gap traps had a high proportion of income from larger fish, which may have led to a perception of benefits, high status, and no defections. The less polarizing neutral-win rather than a strong loss-win tradeoff outcome may explain the full adoption of escape-gap traps 3 years after their introduction. Trap fishers showed an interest in negotiating other management improvements, such as increased mesh sizes for nets, which could ultimately lead to catalyzing community-level decisions that would increase their own profits.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12979" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Examining the relationship between local extinction risk and position in range</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12979</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Examining the relationship between local extinction risk and position in range</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth H. Boakes, Nicholas J.B. Isaac, Richard A. Fuller, Georgina M. Mace, Philip J.K. McGowan</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-05T07:42:58.800013-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12979</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12979</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12979</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Over half of globally threatened animal species have experienced rapid geographic range loss. Identifying the parts of species’ distributions most vulnerable to extinction would benefit conservation planning. However, previous studies give little consensus on whether ranges decline to the core or edge. Here we build on previous work by using empirical data to examine the position of recent local extinctions within species’ geographic ranges, addressing range position as a continuum and exploring the influence of environmental factors. We aggregated point locality data for 125 species of galliform birds across the Palearctic and Indo-Malaya into equal area half degree grid cells and used a multi-species dynamic Bayesian occupancy model to estimate the rates of local extinctions. Our model provides a novel approach to identify loss of populations from within species ranges. We investigated the relationship between extinction rates and distance from range edge, examining whether patterns were consistent across biogeographic realm and different categories of land-use. In the Palearctic, local extinctions occurred closer to the range edge in both unconverted and human-dominated landscapes. In Indo-Malaya, no pattern was found for unconverted landscapes but in human dominated landscapes extinctions tended to occur closer to the core than the edge. Our results suggest that local and regional factors over-ride any general spatial patterns of recent local extinction within species’ ranges and highlight the difficulty of predicting the parts of a species’ distribution most vulnerable to threat.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Over half of globally threatened animal species have experienced rapid geographic range loss. Identifying the parts of species’ distributions most vulnerable to extinction would benefit conservation planning. However, previous studies give little consensus on whether ranges decline to the core or edge. Here we build on previous work by using empirical data to examine the position of recent local extinctions within species’ geographic ranges, addressing range position as a continuum and exploring the influence of environmental factors. We aggregated point locality data for 125 species of galliform birds across the Palearctic and Indo-Malaya into equal area half degree grid cells and used a multi-species dynamic Bayesian occupancy model to estimate the rates of local extinctions. Our model provides a novel approach to identify loss of populations from within species ranges. We investigated the relationship between extinction rates and distance from range edge, examining whether patterns were consistent across biogeographic realm and different categories of land-use. In the Palearctic, local extinctions occurred closer to the range edge in both unconverted and human-dominated landscapes. In Indo-Malaya, no pattern was found for unconverted landscapes but in human dominated landscapes extinctions tended to occur closer to the core than the edge. Our results suggest that local and regional factors over-ride any general spatial patterns of recent local extinction within species’ ranges and highlight the difficulty of predicting the parts of a species’ distribution most vulnerable to threat.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12978" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Biological parameters used in setting captive-breeding quotas for Indonesia's breeding facilities</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12978</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Biological parameters used in setting captive-breeding quotas for Indonesia's breeding facilities</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordi Janssen, Serene C. L. Chng</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-03T06:20:24.918641-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12978</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12978</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12978</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Practice and Policy</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The commercial captive breeding of wildlife is often seen as a potential conservation tool to relieve pressure off wild populations, but laundering of wild-sourced specimens as captive-bred can seriously undermine these and provide a false sense of sustainability. Indonesia has been at the centre of such controversy, therefore we examine Indonesia's captive breeding production plan (CBPP) for 2016. A number of the quotas were found to be based on inaccurate and unrealistic biological parameters, and included species with no reported breeding stock. For 38 species, the quota exceeded the number of animals that can be bred based on the biological parameters (range 100% - 540%) using the equations used in the CBPP. A lower reproductive output was calculated for 88 species using published biological parameters compared to the parameters used in the CBPP. The equations used in the production plan also did not appear to account for other factors involved in breeding the proposed large numbers of specimens. We recommend that the captive breeding production plan be adjusted by using realistic published biological parameters, and remove quotas for species for which captive breeding is unlikely or for which no breeding stock is available. The shortcomings in the current captive breeding production plan create loopholes where mammals, reptiles and amphibians from Indonesia declared as captive-bred may have been sourced from the wild.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The commercial captive breeding of wildlife is often seen as a potential conservation tool to relieve pressure off wild populations, but laundering of wild-sourced specimens as captive-bred can seriously undermine these and provide a false sense of sustainability. Indonesia has been at the centre of such controversy, therefore we examine Indonesia's captive breeding production plan (CBPP) for 2016. A number of the quotas were found to be based on inaccurate and unrealistic biological parameters, and included species with no reported breeding stock. For 38 species, the quota exceeded the number of animals that can be bred based on the biological parameters (range 100% - 540%) using the equations used in the CBPP. A lower reproductive output was calculated for 88 species using published biological parameters compared to the parameters used in the CBPP. The equations used in the production plan also did not appear to account for other factors involved in breeding the proposed large numbers of specimens. We recommend that the captive breeding production plan be adjusted by using realistic published biological parameters, and remove quotas for species for which captive breeding is unlikely or for which no breeding stock is available. The shortcomings in the current captive breeding production plan create loopholes where mammals, reptiles and amphibians from Indonesia declared as captive-bred may have been sourced from the wild.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12976" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Gaps and opportunities for the World Heritage Convention to contribute to global wilderness conservation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12976</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gaps and opportunities for the World Heritage Convention to contribute to global wilderness conservation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James R. Allan, Cyril Kormos, Tilman Jaeger, Oscar Venter, Bastian Bertzky, Yichuan Shi, Brendan Mackey, Remco Merm, Elena Osipova, James E.M. Watson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-30T07:20:25.073835-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12976</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12976</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12976</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Wilderness areas are ecologically intact landscapes predominantly free of human uses, especially industrial scale activities, which result in significant biophysical disturbance. This definition does not exclude indigenous peoples and local communities who live in wilderness areas, depending on them for subsistence, and who have developed deep bio-cultural connections. Wilderness areas are important for biodiversity conservation, along with sustaining key ecological processes, and ecosystem services that underpin planetary life-support systems. Despite these widely recognized benefits and values they are insufficiently protected and are consequently being rapidly eroded. There are increasing calls for multilateral environmental agreements to make a greater and more systematic contribution to wilderness conservation before it is too late. We developed updated global maps of terrestrial wilderness and assessed wilderness coverage by the World Heritage Convention, one of the most important international conservation instruments. We found that one quarter of Natural and Mixed World Heritage Sites (WHS) contain wilderness, conserving a total of 545,307 km<sup>2</sup> (approximately 1.8% of the world's wilderness extent). Many WHS had excellent wilderness coverage such as the <em>Okavango Delta</em> in Botswana (11,914 km<sup>2</sup>) and the <em>Central Suriname Nature Reserve</em> in Suriname (16,029 km<sup>2</sup>). However, 22 (35%) of the world's terrestrial biorealms do not have any wilderness representation within WHS. As an efficient means of filling these gaps, we identify 840 protected areas &gt; 500 km<sup>2</sup> in size which are predominantly wilderness (&gt;50% of their area) and represent 18 of these 22 missing biorealms. These offer a starting point for assessing the potential for the designation of new WHS that could help increase wilderness representation on the World Heritage List. We also urge the World Heritage Convention to help ensure that the ecological integrity and Outstanding Universal Value of existing World Heritage Sites with wilderness values is preserved.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Wilderness areas are ecologically intact landscapes predominantly free of human uses, especially industrial scale activities, which result in significant biophysical disturbance. This definition does not exclude indigenous peoples and local communities who live in wilderness areas, depending on them for subsistence, and who have developed deep bio-cultural connections. Wilderness areas are important for biodiversity conservation, along with sustaining key ecological processes, and ecosystem services that underpin planetary life-support systems. Despite these widely recognized benefits and values they are insufficiently protected and are consequently being rapidly eroded. There are increasing calls for multilateral environmental agreements to make a greater and more systematic contribution to wilderness conservation before it is too late. We developed updated global maps of terrestrial wilderness and assessed wilderness coverage by the World Heritage Convention, one of the most important international conservation instruments. We found that one quarter of Natural and Mixed World Heritage Sites (WHS) contain wilderness, conserving a total of 545,307 km2 (approximately 1.8% of the world's wilderness extent). Many WHS had excellent wilderness coverage such as the Okavango Delta in Botswana (11,914 km2) and the Central Suriname Nature Reserve in Suriname (16,029 km2). However, 22 (35%) of the world's terrestrial biorealms do not have any wilderness representation within WHS. As an efficient means of filling these gaps, we identify 840 protected areas &gt; 500 km2 in size which are predominantly wilderness (&gt;50% of their area) and represent 18 of these 22 missing biorealms. These offer a starting point for assessing the potential for the designation of new WHS that could help increase wilderness representation on the World Heritage List. We also urge the World Heritage Convention to help ensure that the ecological integrity and Outstanding Universal Value of existing World Heritage Sites with wilderness values is preserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12975" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Monitoring, imperfect detection, and risk optimization of a Tasmanian devil insurance population</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12975</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Monitoring, imperfect detection, and risk optimization of a Tasmanian devil insurance population</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tracy M. Rout, Chris Baker, Stewart Huxtable, Brendan A. Wintle</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-28T05:21:04.570111-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12975</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12975</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12975</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Most species are imperfectly detected during biological surveys, creating uncertainty around their abundance or presence at a given location. Decision-makers managing threatened or pest species are regularly faced with this uncertainty, and there are a growing number of examples of managers dealing with imperfect detection. Wildlife diseases have the potential to drive species to extinction, and as such managing species with disease is an important part of conservation. Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) is one such disease that led to the listing of the Tasmanian devil (<em>Sarcophilus harrisii</em>) as endangered. Here we report on the successful use of a state-of-the-art removal modelling approach undertaken in collaboration with practitioners to inform decision-making and facilitate a successful management outcome. We used a Bayesian catch-effort model to estimate population size during removal and monitoring of a diseased Tasmanian devil population. We found it was likely that the population had been successfully removed, even when accounting for a possible introduction of a devil to the site. We then analysed the costs and benefits of declaring the area disease-free prior to reintroduction and establishment of a healthy insurance population. The actions of management, in carrying out additional monitoring prior to this reintroduction, were conservative but prudent given uncertainty and the costs of mistakenly declaring the area disease-free.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Most species are imperfectly detected during biological surveys, creating uncertainty around their abundance or presence at a given location. Decision-makers managing threatened or pest species are regularly faced with this uncertainty, and there are a growing number of examples of managers dealing with imperfect detection. Wildlife diseases have the potential to drive species to extinction, and as such managing species with disease is an important part of conservation. Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) is one such disease that led to the listing of the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) as endangered. Here we report on the successful use of a state-of-the-art removal modelling approach undertaken in collaboration with practitioners to inform decision-making and facilitate a successful management outcome. We used a Bayesian catch-effort model to estimate population size during removal and monitoring of a diseased Tasmanian devil population. We found it was likely that the population had been successfully removed, even when accounting for a possible introduction of a devil to the site. We then analysed the costs and benefits of declaring the area disease-free prior to reintroduction and establishment of a healthy insurance population. The actions of management, in carrying out additional monitoring prior to this reintroduction, were conservative but prudent given uncertainty and the costs of mistakenly declaring the area disease-free.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12974" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A novel habitat-based approach to predict impacts of marine protected areas on fishers</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12974</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A novel habitat-based approach to predict impacts of marine protected areas on fishers</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">João B. Teixeira, Rodrigo L. Moura, Morena Mills, Carissa Klein, Christopher J. Brown, Vanessa M. Adams, Hedley Grantham, Matthew Watts, Deborah Faria, Gilberto M. Amado-Filho, Alex C. Bastos, Reinaldo Lourival, Hugh P. Possingham</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-24T05:47:35.612825-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12974</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12974</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12974</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>While marine protected areas (MPAs) can simultaneously contribute to biodiversity conservation and fisheries management, the global network is biased towards particular ecosystem types, as it was largely established in an ad hoc fashion. The optimization of trade-offs between biodiversity benefits and socio-economic values increases implementation success and minimizes enforcement costs in the long run, but is often neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). Although the acquisition of spatially explicit socioeconomic data is often perceived as a costly/secondary step in MSP, it is critical to account for lost opportunities by people whose activities will be restricted, especially fishers. Here we present an easily-reproducible habitat-based approach to estimate the spatial distribution of opportunity cost to fishers in data poor regions, assuming that the most accessible areas have higher values and their designation as no-take zones represents increased loss of fishing opportunities. Our method requires only habitat and bathymetric maps, a list of target species, the location of ports, and the relative importance for each port and/or vessel/gear type. The potential distribution of fishing resources is estimated from bathymetric ranges and benthic habitat distribution, while the relative importance of the different resources is estimated for each port, considering total catches (kg), revenues and/or stakeholder perception. Finally, the model can combine different cost layers to produce a comprehensive cost layer, and also allows for the evaluation of tradeoffs. The development of FishCake was based on data from a contentious conservation-planning arena (Abrolhos Bank, Brazil) in which attempts to expand MPA coverage failed due to fishers’ resistance. The opportunity cost approach that we introduce herein allows for the incorporation of economic interests of different stakeholders and evaluation of tradeoffs among different stakeholder groups. The novel approach can be directly used to support conservation planning, in Abrolhos and elsewhere, and is expected to facilitate community consultation.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

While marine protected areas (MPAs) can simultaneously contribute to biodiversity conservation and fisheries management, the global network is biased towards particular ecosystem types, as it was largely established in an ad hoc fashion. The optimization of trade-offs between biodiversity benefits and socio-economic values increases implementation success and minimizes enforcement costs in the long run, but is often neglected in marine spatial planning (MSP). Although the acquisition of spatially explicit socioeconomic data is often perceived as a costly/secondary step in MSP, it is critical to account for lost opportunities by people whose activities will be restricted, especially fishers. Here we present an easily-reproducible habitat-based approach to estimate the spatial distribution of opportunity cost to fishers in data poor regions, assuming that the most accessible areas have higher values and their designation as no-take zones represents increased loss of fishing opportunities. Our method requires only habitat and bathymetric maps, a list of target species, the location of ports, and the relative importance for each port and/or vessel/gear type. The potential distribution of fishing resources is estimated from bathymetric ranges and benthic habitat distribution, while the relative importance of the different resources is estimated for each port, considering total catches (kg), revenues and/or stakeholder perception. Finally, the model can combine different cost layers to produce a comprehensive cost layer, and also allows for the evaluation of tradeoffs. The development of FishCake was based on data from a contentious conservation-planning arena (Abrolhos Bank, Brazil) in which attempts to expand MPA coverage failed due to fishers’ resistance. The opportunity cost approach that we introduce herein allows for the incorporation of economic interests of different stakeholders and evaluation of tradeoffs among different stakeholder groups. The novel approach can be directly used to support conservation planning, in Abrolhos and elsewhere, and is expected to facilitate community consultation.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12972" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Estimating abundance without recaptures of marked pallid sturgeon in the Mississippi River</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12972</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Estimating abundance without recaptures of marked pallid sturgeon in the Mississippi River</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicholas A. Friedenberg, Jan J. Hoover, Krista Boysen, K. Jack Killgore</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-22T01:52:24.671763-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12972</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12972</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12972</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Methods Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Abundance estimates are essential for estimating the viability of populations and the risks posed by alternative management actions. An effort to estimate abundance via a repeated mark-recapture experiment may fail to recapture marked individuals. We present a framework for obtaining lower bounds on abundance in the absence of recaptures for both panmictic and spatially-structured populations. We applied this nil-recapture method to data from a 12-year survey of pallid sturgeon (<em>Scaphirhynchus albus</em>) in the lower and middle Mississippi River; none of the 241 individuals marked were recaptured in the survey. After accounting for survival and movement, our model-averaged estimate of the total abundance of age 3+ pallid sturgeon in the study area had a 1%, 5%, or 25% chance of being less than 4,600, 7,000, or 15,000, respectively. If we assumed fish were distributed in proportion to survey catch-per-unit-effort, then the furthest downstream reach in the survey hosted at least 4.5-15 fish per river kilometer (rkm), whereas the remainder of the reaches in the lower and middle Mississippi River hosted at least 2.6-8.5 fish rkm<sup>−1</sup> for all model variations examined. The lower Mississippi River had an average density of at least 3.0-9.8 age-3+ pallid sturgeon rkm<sup>−1</sup>. The choice of Bayesian prior was the largest source of uncertainty considered in this study, but did not alter the order of magnitude of lower bounds. Nil-recapture estimates of abundance are highly uncertain and require careful communication but can deliver insights from experiments that might otherwise be considered a failure.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Abundance estimates are essential for estimating the viability of populations and the risks posed by alternative management actions. An effort to estimate abundance via a repeated mark-recapture experiment may fail to recapture marked individuals. We present a framework for obtaining lower bounds on abundance in the absence of recaptures for both panmictic and spatially-structured populations. We applied this nil-recapture method to data from a 12-year survey of pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) in the lower and middle Mississippi River; none of the 241 individuals marked were recaptured in the survey. After accounting for survival and movement, our model-averaged estimate of the total abundance of age 3+ pallid sturgeon in the study area had a 1%, 5%, or 25% chance of being less than 4,600, 7,000, or 15,000, respectively. If we assumed fish were distributed in proportion to survey catch-per-unit-effort, then the furthest downstream reach in the survey hosted at least 4.5-15 fish per river kilometer (rkm), whereas the remainder of the reaches in the lower and middle Mississippi River hosted at least 2.6-8.5 fish rkm−1 for all model variations examined. The lower Mississippi River had an average density of at least 3.0-9.8 age-3+ pallid sturgeon rkm−1. The choice of Bayesian prior was the largest source of uncertainty considered in this study, but did not alter the order of magnitude of lower bounds. Nil-recapture estimates of abundance are highly uncertain and require careful communication but can deliver insights from experiments that might otherwise be considered a failure.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12970" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12970</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oscar Venter, Ainhoa Magrach, Nick Outram, Carissa Joy Klein, Moreno Di Marco, James E.M. Watson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-21T23:50:58.429205-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12970</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12970</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12970</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>To contribute to the aspirations of recent international biodiversity conventions, protected areas (PAs) must be strategically located, and not simply established on economically marginal lands as they have in the past. With refined international commitments under the Convention of Biodiversity to target protected areas in places of ‘importance to biodiversity’, this may now be the case. Here we analyze location biases in PAs globally over both historic (pre-2004) and recent time periods. Discouragingly, we find that both old and new protected areas are not targeting places with high concentration of threatened vertebrate species. Instead, they appear to be established in locations that minimize conflict with agriculturally suitable lands. This entrenchment of past trends has significant implications for the contributions these protected areas are making to international commitments to conserve biodiversity. We discover that if protected area growth between 2004 and 2014 had strategically targeted unrepresented threatened vertebrates, it would have been possible to protect &gt;30 times more species (3086 or 2553 potential vs 85 actual new species represented) for the same area or the same cost as the actual expansion that occurred. With the land available for conservation declining, nations must urgently focus new protection on places that provide for the conservation outcomes outlined in international treaties.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

To contribute to the aspirations of recent international biodiversity conventions, protected areas (PAs) must be strategically located, and not simply established on economically marginal lands as they have in the past. With refined international commitments under the Convention of Biodiversity to target protected areas in places of ‘importance to biodiversity’, this may now be the case. Here we analyze location biases in PAs globally over both historic (pre-2004) and recent time periods. Discouragingly, we find that both old and new protected areas are not targeting places with high concentration of threatened vertebrate species. Instead, they appear to be established in locations that minimize conflict with agriculturally suitable lands. This entrenchment of past trends has significant implications for the contributions these protected areas are making to international commitments to conserve biodiversity. We discover that if protected area growth between 2004 and 2014 had strategically targeted unrepresented threatened vertebrates, it would have been possible to protect &gt;30 times more species (3086 or 2553 potential vs 85 actual new species represented) for the same area or the same cost as the actual expansion that occurred. With the land available for conservation declining, nations must urgently focus new protection on places that provide for the conservation outcomes outlined in international treaties.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12969" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Determining the drivers of population structure in a highly urbanized landscape to inform conservation planning</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12969</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Determining the drivers of population structure in a highly urbanized landscape to inform conservation planning</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henri A. Thomassen, Ryan J. Harrigan, Kathleen Semple Delaney, Seth P.D. Riley, Laurel E. K. Serieys, Katherine Pease, Robert K. Wayne, Thomas B. Smith</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-20T06:29:20.353953-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12969</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12969</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12969</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Understanding the environmental contributors to population structure is of paramount importance for conservation in urbanized environments. We used spatially-explicit models to determine genetic population structure under current and future environmental conditions across a highly fragmented, human-dominated environment in Southern California to assess the effects of natural ecological variation and urbanization. We focused on seven common species with diverse habitat requirements, home range sizes, and dispersal abilities. We quantified the relative roles of potential barriers, including natural environmental characteristics and an anthropogenic barrier created by a major highway, in shaping genetic variation. The ability to predict genetic variation in our models varied between species: nine to 81% of intraspecific genetic variation was explained by environmental variables. Although an anthropogenically-induced barrier (here a major highway) severely restricts gene flow and movement at broad scales for some species, genetic variation seems to be primarily driven by natural environmental heterogeneity at a local level. Results show how assessing environmentally associated variation (EAV) for multiple species under current and future climate conditions can help to identify priority regions for maximizing population persistence under environmental change in urbanized regions.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Understanding the environmental contributors to population structure is of paramount importance for conservation in urbanized environments. We used spatially-explicit models to determine genetic population structure under current and future environmental conditions across a highly fragmented, human-dominated environment in Southern California to assess the effects of natural ecological variation and urbanization. We focused on seven common species with diverse habitat requirements, home range sizes, and dispersal abilities. We quantified the relative roles of potential barriers, including natural environmental characteristics and an anthropogenic barrier created by a major highway, in shaping genetic variation. The ability to predict genetic variation in our models varied between species: nine to 81% of intraspecific genetic variation was explained by environmental variables. Although an anthropogenically-induced barrier (here a major highway) severely restricts gene flow and movement at broad scales for some species, genetic variation seems to be primarily driven by natural environmental heterogeneity at a local level. Results show how assessing environmentally associated variation (EAV) for multiple species under current and future climate conditions can help to identify priority regions for maximizing population persistence under environmental change in urbanized regions.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12966" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Prospects for stakeholder coordination by protected-area managers in Europe</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12966</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prospects for stakeholder coordination by protected-area managers in Europe</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brady J. Mattsson, Harald Vacik</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-15T03:50:20.810586-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12966</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12966</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12966</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Growing resource demands by humans, invasive species, natural hazards, and a changing climate are creating broad-scale impacts and have created the need for broader-extent conservation activities that span ownerships and even political borders. Implementing regional-scale conservation brings great challenges, and learning how to overcome these challenges is essential for maintaining biodiversity (i.e., richness and evenness of biological communities) and ecosystem functions and services across scales and borders in the face of system change. We administered an online survey to examine factors potentially driving perspectives of protected area (PA) managers regarding coordination with neighboring PAs and other stakeholders (i.e., stakeholder coordination) for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services during the next decade within diverse regions across Europe. Although &gt;70% of responding PA managers indicated that climate change and invasive species are relevant for their PAs, they gave &lt;50% chance that these threats could be mitigated through stakeholder coordination. They did, however, give &gt;60% chance that stakeholder coordination would take place with the aim to improve conservation outcomes. Consistent with the foundation upon which many European PAs was established, managers viewed maintaining or enhancing biodiversity as the most important (&gt;70%) expected benefit. Other important benefits included maintaining or enhancing human resources and environmental education (range of Bayesian credibility intervals [CIs]: 57–93%). The main barriers to stakeholder coordination were the lack of human and economic resources (CI: 59–67% chance of hindering) followed by communication and inter-stakeholder differences in political structures and laws (range of CIs: 51–64% chance of hindering). European policies and strategies that address these hindering factors could be particularly effective means of enabling implementation of green infrastructure networks, with PAs serving as the nodes.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Growing resource demands by humans, invasive species, natural hazards, and a changing climate are creating broad-scale impacts and have created the need for broader-extent conservation activities that span ownerships and even political borders. Implementing regional-scale conservation brings great challenges, and learning how to overcome these challenges is essential for maintaining biodiversity (i.e., richness and evenness of biological communities) and ecosystem functions and services across scales and borders in the face of system change. We administered an online survey to examine factors potentially driving perspectives of protected area (PA) managers regarding coordination with neighboring PAs and other stakeholders (i.e., stakeholder coordination) for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services during the next decade within diverse regions across Europe. Although &gt;70% of responding PA managers indicated that climate change and invasive species are relevant for their PAs, they gave &lt;50% chance that these threats could be mitigated through stakeholder coordination. They did, however, give &gt;60% chance that stakeholder coordination would take place with the aim to improve conservation outcomes. Consistent with the foundation upon which many European PAs was established, managers viewed maintaining or enhancing biodiversity as the most important (&gt;70%) expected benefit. Other important benefits included maintaining or enhancing human resources and environmental education (range of Bayesian credibility intervals [CIs]: 57–93%). The main barriers to stakeholder coordination were the lack of human and economic resources (CI: 59–67% chance of hindering) followed by communication and inter-stakeholder differences in political structures and laws (range of CIs: 51–64% chance of hindering). European policies and strategies that address these hindering factors could be particularly effective means of enabling implementation of green infrastructure networks, with PAs serving as the nodes.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12968" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using soundscapes to detect variable degrees of human influence on tropical forests in Papua New Guinea</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12968</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using soundscapes to detect variable degrees of human influence on tropical forests in Papua New Guinea</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zuzana Burivalova, Michael Towsey, Tim Boucher, Anthony Truskinger, Cosmas Apelis, Paul Roe, Edward T. Game</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-14T07:20:36.978881-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12968</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12968</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12968</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>There is global concern about tropical forest degradation, in part, because of the associated loss of biodiversity. Communities and indigenous people play a fundamental role in tropical forest management and they are often efficient at preventing forest degradation. However, monitoring changes in biodiversity due to degradation, especially at a scale appropriate to local tropical forest management, is marred with difficulties including the need for expert training, inconsistency across observers, and the lack of baseline or reference data. We used a new biodiversity remote sensing technology, the recording of soundscapes, to test whether the acoustic saturation of a soundscape decreases with increasing land use intensity by the communities that manage the tropical forests in Papua New Guinea. We found that land use zones where forest cover was fully retained had a significantly higher soundscape saturation during peak acoustic activity times, corresponding to the dawn and dusk chorus, compared with land use types with fragmented forest cover. We conclude that, in Papua New Guinea, the relatively simple measure of soundscape saturation may provide a cheap, objective, reproducible, and effective tool to monitor tropical forest deviation from intact state, particularly through detecting the presence of an intact dawn and dusk chorus.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

There is global concern about tropical forest degradation, in part, because of the associated loss of biodiversity. Communities and indigenous people play a fundamental role in tropical forest management and they are often efficient at preventing forest degradation. However, monitoring changes in biodiversity due to degradation, especially at a scale appropriate to local tropical forest management, is marred with difficulties including the need for expert training, inconsistency across observers, and the lack of baseline or reference data. We used a new biodiversity remote sensing technology, the recording of soundscapes, to test whether the acoustic saturation of a soundscape decreases with increasing land use intensity by the communities that manage the tropical forests in Papua New Guinea. We found that land use zones where forest cover was fully retained had a significantly higher soundscape saturation during peak acoustic activity times, corresponding to the dawn and dusk chorus, compared with land use types with fragmented forest cover. We conclude that, in Papua New Guinea, the relatively simple measure of soundscape saturation may provide a cheap, objective, reproducible, and effective tool to monitor tropical forest deviation from intact state, particularly through detecting the presence of an intact dawn and dusk chorus.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12967" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The effectiveness of surrogate taxa to conserve freshwater biodiversity</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12967</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The effectiveness of surrogate taxa to conserve freshwater biodiversity</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David R. Stewart, Zachary E. Underwood, Frank J. Rahel, Annika W. Walters</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-14T07:20:22.025676-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12967</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12967</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12967</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Establishing protected areas has long been an effective conservation strategy, and is often based on more readily surveyed species. The potential of any freshwater taxa to be a surrogate of other aquatic groups has not been fully explored. We compiled occurrence data on 72 species of freshwater fish, amphibians, mussels, and aquatic reptiles for the Great Plains, Wyoming. We used hierarchical Bayesian multi-species mixture models and MaxEnt models to describe species distributions, and program Zonation to identify conservation priority areas for each aquatic group. The landscape-scale factors that best characterized aquatic species distributions differed among groups. There was low agreement and congruence among taxa-specific conservation priorities (&lt;20%), meaning that no surrogate priority areas would include or protect the best habitats of other aquatic taxa. We found that common, wide-ranging aquatic species were included in taxa-specific priority areas, but rare freshwater species were not included. Thus, the development of conservation priorities based on a single freshwater aquatic group would not protect all species in the other aquatic groups.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Establishing protected areas has long been an effective conservation strategy, and is often based on more readily surveyed species. The potential of any freshwater taxa to be a surrogate of other aquatic groups has not been fully explored. We compiled occurrence data on 72 species of freshwater fish, amphibians, mussels, and aquatic reptiles for the Great Plains, Wyoming. We used hierarchical Bayesian multi-species mixture models and MaxEnt models to describe species distributions, and program Zonation to identify conservation priority areas for each aquatic group. The landscape-scale factors that best characterized aquatic species distributions differed among groups. There was low agreement and congruence among taxa-specific conservation priorities (&lt;20%), meaning that no surrogate priority areas would include or protect the best habitats of other aquatic taxa. We found that common, wide-ranging aquatic species were included in taxa-specific priority areas, but rare freshwater species were not included. Thus, the development of conservation priorities based on a single freshwater aquatic group would not protect all species in the other aquatic groups.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12965" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Use of radar detectors to track attendance of albatrosses at fishing vessels</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12965</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Use of radar detectors to track attendance of albatrosses at fishing vessels</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">H. Weimerskirch, D.P. Filippi, J. Collet, S.M. Waugh, S.C. Patrick</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-09T07:50:36.355397-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12965</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12965</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12965</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Methods Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Despite international waters covering over 60% of the world's oceans, our understanding of how fisheries in these regions shape ecosystem processes is surprisingly poor. Seabirds are known to forage at fishing vessels, with potential deleterious effects for their population, but the extent of overlap and behavior in relation to ships are poorly known. Using novel biologging devices, which can detect radar emissions to record the position of boats and seabirds, we measured the true extent of the overlap between seabirds and fishing vessels, and generated estimates of the intensity of fishing and distribution of vessels in international waters. During breeding, wandering albatrosses from the Crozet islands patrolled an area of more than 10 million square kilometers and as much as 79.5% of birds equipped with loggers detected vessels, at distances up to 2500 km from the colony, modifying their natural foraging behavior to attend boats. The extent of this overlap has widespread implications for bycatch risk in seabirds and reveals the areas of intense fishing throughout the ocean. We suggest that seabirds equipped with radar detectors are excellent monitors of the presence of vessels in the southern ocean, offering a new way to monitor fisheries. The method used opens new perspectives to monitor the presence of illegal fisheries and to better understand the impact of fisheries on seabirds.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Despite international waters covering over 60% of the world's oceans, our understanding of how fisheries in these regions shape ecosystem processes is surprisingly poor. Seabirds are known to forage at fishing vessels, with potential deleterious effects for their population, but the extent of overlap and behavior in relation to ships are poorly known. Using novel biologging devices, which can detect radar emissions to record the position of boats and seabirds, we measured the true extent of the overlap between seabirds and fishing vessels, and generated estimates of the intensity of fishing and distribution of vessels in international waters. During breeding, wandering albatrosses from the Crozet islands patrolled an area of more than 10 million square kilometers and as much as 79.5% of birds equipped with loggers detected vessels, at distances up to 2500 km from the colony, modifying their natural foraging behavior to attend boats. The extent of this overlap has widespread implications for bycatch risk in seabirds and reveals the areas of intense fishing throughout the ocean. We suggest that seabirds equipped with radar detectors are excellent monitors of the presence of vessels in the southern ocean, offering a new way to monitor fisheries. The method used opens new perspectives to monitor the presence of illegal fisheries and to better understand the impact of fisheries on seabirds.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12964" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Research priorities for conservation and natural resource management in Oceania's small island developing states</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12964</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Research priorities for conservation and natural resource management in Oceania's small island developing states</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R. Weeks, V. M. Adams</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-06T00:20:20.27421-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12964</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12964</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12964</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>For conservation science to effectively inform management, research must focus on creating the scientific knowledge required to solve conservation problems. We report the outcomes of an exercise to identify research questions that, if answered, would increase the effectiveness of conservation and natural resource management practice and policy within Oceania's small island developing states. Respondents from academia, government, and nongovernment organizations across the region surveyed online proposed 270 questions, and subsequently identified 38 of these as high priority. High priority questions speak to the particular challenges of undertaking conservation within small island developing states, and the need for a research agenda that is responsive to the socio-cultural context of Oceania. Our comparison with research priorities identified globally and for other regions revealed broad thematic similarities but also highlighted important differences in specific issues that are relevant to particular conservation contexts. This emphasizes the importance of involving local practitioners in the identification of research priorities. We found that priorities were reasonably well aligned between sectoral groups. Only a few questions were widely considered to be already answered; this may indicate a smaller than expected knowledge-action gap. We hope that these questions can act to strengthen research collaborations between scientists and practitioners working to further conservation and natural resource management in this region.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

For conservation science to effectively inform management, research must focus on creating the scientific knowledge required to solve conservation problems. We report the outcomes of an exercise to identify research questions that, if answered, would increase the effectiveness of conservation and natural resource management practice and policy within Oceania's small island developing states. Respondents from academia, government, and nongovernment organizations across the region surveyed online proposed 270 questions, and subsequently identified 38 of these as high priority. High priority questions speak to the particular challenges of undertaking conservation within small island developing states, and the need for a research agenda that is responsive to the socio-cultural context of Oceania. Our comparison with research priorities identified globally and for other regions revealed broad thematic similarities but also highlighted important differences in specific issues that are relevant to particular conservation contexts. This emphasizes the importance of involving local practitioners in the identification of research priorities. We found that priorities were reasonably well aligned between sectoral groups. Only a few questions were widely considered to be already answered; this may indicate a smaller than expected knowledge-action gap. We hope that these questions can act to strengthen research collaborations between scientists and practitioners working to further conservation and natural resource management in this region.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12960" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Land-use history as a guide for forest conservation and management</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12960</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Land-use history as a guide for forest conservation and management</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cathy Whitlock, Daniele Colombaroli, Marco Conedera, Willy Tinner</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-02T06:20:38.713924-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12960</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12960</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12960</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Conservation efforts to protect forested landscapes are challenged by climate projections that suggest significant restructuring of vegetation and disturbance regimes in the future. In this regard, paleoecological records that describe ecosystem responses to past variations in climate, fire and human activity offer critical information for assessing present landscape conditions and future landscape vulnerability. We illustrate this point drawing on eight sites in the northwest U.S., New Zealand, Patagonia, and central and southern Europe that have experienced different levels of climate and land-use change. These sites fall along a gradient of landscape conditions that range from near-pristine (i.e., where vegetation and disturbance have been significantly shaped by past climate and biophysical constraints) to highly altered (i.e., landscapes that have been intensely modified by past human activity). Position on this gradient has implications for understanding the role of natural and anthropogenic disturbance in shaping ecosystem dynamics and assessments of present biodiversity, including recognizing missing or overrepresented species. All the study sites reveal dramatic vegetation reorganization in the past as a result of postglacial climate variations. In nearly-pristine landscapes, like Yellowstone, climate has remained the primary driver of ecosystem change up to the present day. In Europe, natural vegetation-climate-fire linkages were broken ∼6000-8000 years ago with the onset of Neolithic farming, and in New Zealand, natural linkages were first lost ∼700 years ago with arrival of the Māori people. In the northwestern U.S. and Patagonia, greatest landscape alteration has occurred in the last 150 years with Euro-American settlement. Paleoecology is sometimes the best and only tool for evaluating the degree of this alteration and the extent to which landscapes retain natural components. Information on landscape-level history thus helps assess current ecological change, clarify management objectives, and define conservation strategies that seek to protect both “natural” and “cultural” elements.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Conservation efforts to protect forested landscapes are challenged by climate projections that suggest significant restructuring of vegetation and disturbance regimes in the future. In this regard, paleoecological records that describe ecosystem responses to past variations in climate, fire and human activity offer critical information for assessing present landscape conditions and future landscape vulnerability. We illustrate this point drawing on eight sites in the northwest U.S., New Zealand, Patagonia, and central and southern Europe that have experienced different levels of climate and land-use change. These sites fall along a gradient of landscape conditions that range from near-pristine (i.e., where vegetation and disturbance have been significantly shaped by past climate and biophysical constraints) to highly altered (i.e., landscapes that have been intensely modified by past human activity). Position on this gradient has implications for understanding the role of natural and anthropogenic disturbance in shaping ecosystem dynamics and assessments of present biodiversity, including recognizing missing or overrepresented species. All the study sites reveal dramatic vegetation reorganization in the past as a result of postglacial climate variations. In nearly-pristine landscapes, like Yellowstone, climate has remained the primary driver of ecosystem change up to the present day. In Europe, natural vegetation-climate-fire linkages were broken ∼6000-8000 years ago with the onset of Neolithic farming, and in New Zealand, natural linkages were first lost ∼700 years ago with arrival of the Māori people. In the northwestern U.S. and Patagonia, greatest landscape alteration has occurred in the last 150 years with Euro-American settlement. Paleoecology is sometimes the best and only tool for evaluating the degree of this alteration and the extent to which landscapes retain natural components. Information on landscape-level history thus helps assess current ecological change, clarify management objectives, and define conservation strategies that seek to protect both “natural” and “cultural” elements.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12963" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Quantitative tools for implementing the new definition of significant portion of the range in the Endangered Species Act</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12963</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Quantitative tools for implementing the new definition of significant portion of the range in the Endangered Species Act</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julia E. Earl, Sam Nicol, Ruscena Wiederholt, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Darius Semmens, D. T. Tyler Flockhart, Brady J. Mattsson, Gary McCracken, D. Ryan Norris, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Laura López-Hoffman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-02T06:20:31.857275-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12963</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12963</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12963</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In July 2014, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service announced a new policy interpretation for the Endangered Species Act. According to the Act, a species must be listed as threatened or endangered if it is determined to be threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range. The 1973 law does not define “significant portion of its range,” leading to concerns that interpretations of “significant” by federal agencies and the courts could be inconsistent. The 2014 policy seeks to provide consistency by establishing that a portion of the range should be considered significant if the associated individuals’ “removal would cause the entire species to become endangered or threatened.” Here, we review quantitative techniques to assess whether a portion of a species’ range is significant according to the new guidance. Our assessments are based on the “3R” criteria – Redundancy (i.e., buffering from catastrophe), Resiliency (i.e., ability to withstand stochasticity), and Representation (i.e., ability to evolve) – that the Fish and Wildlife Service uses to determine if a species merits listing. We identify data needs for each quantitative technique and indicate which methods might be implemented given the data limitations typical of rare species. We also identify proxies that may be used with limited data. To assess potential data availability, we evaluate seven example species by assessing the data in their Species Status Assessments, which document all the information used during a listing decision. Our evaluation suggests that resiliency assessments will likely be most constrained by limited data. While we reviewed quantitative techniques for the US Endangered Species Act, other countries have legislation requiring identification of significant areas that could benefit from this research.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

In July 2014, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service announced a new policy interpretation for the Endangered Species Act. According to the Act, a species must be listed as threatened or endangered if it is determined to be threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range. The 1973 law does not define “significant portion of its range,” leading to concerns that interpretations of “significant” by federal agencies and the courts could be inconsistent. The 2014 policy seeks to provide consistency by establishing that a portion of the range should be considered significant if the associated individuals’ “removal would cause the entire species to become endangered or threatened.” Here, we review quantitative techniques to assess whether a portion of a species’ range is significant according to the new guidance. Our assessments are based on the “3R” criteria – Redundancy (i.e., buffering from catastrophe), Resiliency (i.e., ability to withstand stochasticity), and Representation (i.e., ability to evolve) – that the Fish and Wildlife Service uses to determine if a species merits listing. We identify data needs for each quantitative technique and indicate which methods might be implemented given the data limitations typical of rare species. We also identify proxies that may be used with limited data. To assess potential data availability, we evaluate seven example species by assessing the data in their Species Status Assessments, which document all the information used during a listing decision. Our evaluation suggests that resiliency assessments will likely be most constrained by limited data. While we reviewed quantitative techniques for the US Endangered Species Act, other countries have legislation requiring identification of significant areas that could benefit from this research.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12957" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Critical factors for the recovery of marine mammals</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12957</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Critical factors for the recovery of marine mammals</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heike K. Lotze, Joanna Mills Flemming, Anna M. Magera</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-10T08:00:28.017114-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12957</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12957</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12957</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Over the past decades, much research has focused on understanding the critical factors for marine extinctions with the aim of preventing further species losses in the oceans. Although conservation and management strategies are enabling several species and populations to recover, others remain at low abundance levels or experience further declines. To understand these discrepancies, we asked which intrinsic and extrinsic factors are critical for the recovery of marine mammals. Building on a published database on abundance trends of 137 marine mammal populations worldwide, we compiled data on 28 potential critical factors and used random forests and additive mixed models in our analytical approach. Our results highlight that a mix of life-history characteristics, ecological traits, phylogenetic relatedness, population size, geographic range, human impacts and management efforts were important in explaining why populations recover or not. Generally, species with lower age at maturity and intermediate habitat area were more likely to recover, which is consistent with life-history and ecological theory. Body size and ocean basin were also important, as well as trophic level, social interactions, the dominant habitat and habitat disturbance. Overall, our results highlight that not one or two, but a range of intrinsic and extrinsic factors are important for recovery, pointing to cumulative effects. This new line of research provides important information for improving conservation and management strategies particularly for those populations that have been unable to recover to date.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Over the past decades, much research has focused on understanding the critical factors for marine extinctions with the aim of preventing further species losses in the oceans. Although conservation and management strategies are enabling several species and populations to recover, others remain at low abundance levels or experience further declines. To understand these discrepancies, we asked which intrinsic and extrinsic factors are critical for the recovery of marine mammals. Building on a published database on abundance trends of 137 marine mammal populations worldwide, we compiled data on 28 potential critical factors and used random forests and additive mixed models in our analytical approach. Our results highlight that a mix of life-history characteristics, ecological traits, phylogenetic relatedness, population size, geographic range, human impacts and management efforts were important in explaining why populations recover or not. Generally, species with lower age at maturity and intermediate habitat area were more likely to recover, which is consistent with life-history and ecological theory. Body size and ocean basin were also important, as well as trophic level, social interactions, the dominant habitat and habitat disturbance. Overall, our results highlight that not one or two, but a range of intrinsic and extrinsic factors are important for recovery, pointing to cumulative effects. This new line of research provides important information for improving conservation and management strategies particularly for those populations that have been unable to recover to date.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12956" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using citizen science butterfly counts to predict species population trends</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12956</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using citizen science butterfly counts to predict species population trends</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emily B. Dennis, Byron J.T. Morgan, Tom M. Brereton, David B. Roy, Richard Fox</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-05T07:20:40.061214-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12956</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12956</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12956</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Citizen scientists are increasingly engaged in gathering biodiversity information, but trade-offs are often required between public engagement goals and reliable data collection. We compare population estimates derived from the first four years (2011-2014) of a short-duration citizen science project (Big Butterfly Count, BBC), to those from long-running, standardized monitoring data collected by experienced observers (UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme, UKBMS), for 18 widespread butterfly species. BBC data are gathered during an annual, three-week period, whereas UKBMS sampling takes place over six months each year. An initial comparison with UKBMS data restricted to the three-week BBC period revealed that species population changes were significantly correlated between the two sources. The short-duration sampling season renders BBC counts susceptible to bias caused by inter-annual phenological variation in the timing of species’ flight periods. BBC counts were found to be described well by measures for phenology and sampling effort. Annual estimates of species abundance and population trends predicted from models including BBC data and weather covariates as a proxy for phenology correlated significantly with those derived from UKBMS data. In validating the BBC counts, we show, for the first time, that citizen science data, obtained using a simple sampling protocol, can produce comparable estimates of insect species abundance to standardized monitoring data. Although caution is urged in extrapolating from this UK study of a small number of common, conspicuous insects, we demonstrate that mass-participation citizen science can simultaneously contribute to public engagement and biodiversity monitoring. Mass-participation citizen science is not an adequate replacement for standardised biodiversity monitoring but may have a role in extending and complementing it (e.g. by sampling different land-use types), as well as serving to reconnect an increasingly urban human population with nature.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Citizen scientists are increasingly engaged in gathering biodiversity information, but trade-offs are often required between public engagement goals and reliable data collection. We compare population estimates derived from the first four years (2011-2014) of a short-duration citizen science project (Big Butterfly Count, BBC), to those from long-running, standardized monitoring data collected by experienced observers (UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme, UKBMS), for 18 widespread butterfly species. BBC data are gathered during an annual, three-week period, whereas UKBMS sampling takes place over six months each year. An initial comparison with UKBMS data restricted to the three-week BBC period revealed that species population changes were significantly correlated between the two sources. The short-duration sampling season renders BBC counts susceptible to bias caused by inter-annual phenological variation in the timing of species’ flight periods. BBC counts were found to be described well by measures for phenology and sampling effort. Annual estimates of species abundance and population trends predicted from models including BBC data and weather covariates as a proxy for phenology correlated significantly with those derived from UKBMS data. In validating the BBC counts, we show, for the first time, that citizen science data, obtained using a simple sampling protocol, can produce comparable estimates of insect species abundance to standardized monitoring data. Although caution is urged in extrapolating from this UK study of a small number of common, conspicuous insects, we demonstrate that mass-participation citizen science can simultaneously contribute to public engagement and biodiversity monitoring. Mass-participation citizen science is not an adequate replacement for standardised biodiversity monitoring but may have a role in extending and complementing it (e.g. by sampling different land-use types), as well as serving to reconnect an increasingly urban human population with nature.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12955" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The rise of glyphosate and new opportunities for biosentinel early-warning studies</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12955</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The rise of glyphosate and new opportunities for biosentinel early-warning studies</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zoe Kissane, Jill M. Shephard</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-05T07:20:34.692354-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12955</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12955</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12955</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Glyphosate has become the most commonly used herbicide worldwide, with a reputation of being environmentally benign, non-toxic and safe to wildlife and humans. However, studies have indicated its toxicity has been underestimated, and that its persistence in the environment is greater than once thought. Its actions as a neurotoxin and endocrine disruptor indicate its potential to act in similar ways to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as the organochlorine (OC) chemicals dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dioxin. Exposure to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides for both wildlife and people is likely to be chronic and at sub-lethal levels, with multiple and ongoing exposure events in both urban and agricultural landscapes. Despite this, little research attention has been given to the impact of glyphosate on wildlife populations, and existing studies appear in the agricultural, toxicology and water chemistry literature that may have limited visibility among wildlife biologists. There is a strong case for the recognition of glyphosate as an ‘emerging organic contaminant’ and significant potential exists for collaborative research between ecologists, toxicologists and chemists to quantify the impact of glyphosate on wildlife and to evaluate the role of biosentinel species in a preemptive move to mitigate downstream impacts on people. Success will depend on the development of new and novel non-destructive sampling and analysis methodologies as <em>ex post facto</em> identification of toxins at lethal levels has limited utility. Concentrating on the chemistry and toxicity of glyphosate, we have examined the published literature to evaluate the extent to which glyphosate based herbicides can cause toxic effects in wildlife and people and the implications of chronic exposure. We then explore the idea of using birds as bioindicators of glyphosate toxicity. We hope this may encourage future research into the uptake and impact of organophosphate chemicals in target species, particularly traditional indicator species such as birds.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Glyphosate has become the most commonly used herbicide worldwide, with a reputation of being environmentally benign, non-toxic and safe to wildlife and humans. However, studies have indicated its toxicity has been underestimated, and that its persistence in the environment is greater than once thought. Its actions as a neurotoxin and endocrine disruptor indicate its potential to act in similar ways to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as the organochlorine (OC) chemicals dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dioxin. Exposure to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides for both wildlife and people is likely to be chronic and at sub-lethal levels, with multiple and ongoing exposure events in both urban and agricultural landscapes. Despite this, little research attention has been given to the impact of glyphosate on wildlife populations, and existing studies appear in the agricultural, toxicology and water chemistry literature that may have limited visibility among wildlife biologists. There is a strong case for the recognition of glyphosate as an ‘emerging organic contaminant’ and significant potential exists for collaborative research between ecologists, toxicologists and chemists to quantify the impact of glyphosate on wildlife and to evaluate the role of biosentinel species in a preemptive move to mitigate downstream impacts on people. Success will depend on the development of new and novel non-destructive sampling and analysis methodologies as ex post facto identification of toxins at lethal levels has limited utility. Concentrating on the chemistry and toxicity of glyphosate, we have examined the published literature to evaluate the extent to which glyphosate based herbicides can cause toxic effects in wildlife and people and the implications of chronic exposure. We then explore the idea of using birds as bioindicators of glyphosate toxicity. We hope this may encourage future research into the uptake and impact of organophosphate chemicals in target species, particularly traditional indicator species such as birds.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12949" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A view of the global conservation job market and how to succeed in it</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12949</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A view of the global conservation job market and how to succeed in it</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jane Lucas, Evan Gora, Alfonso Alonso</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-02T10:56:56.428742-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12949</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12949</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12949</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Practice and Policy</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The high demand for conservation-based work is creating a need for conservation-focused training of current and future graduate students. While many graduates with tertiary degrees in biology are finding careers outside of academia, many programs and mentors continue to prepare students to follow in the footsteps of their professors. Unfortunately, information regarding how to appropriately prepare for today's job market and find success in conservation careers is limited in detail and scope. This problem is further complicated by the differing needs of conservation positions distributed among diverse employers in both economically advanced and developing regions across the globe. To help young scientists identify the tools needed for conservation positions worldwide, we review the current global conservation job market and identify skills required for success in academic, governmental, nonprofit, and private positions. We found that positions in nonprofit organizations are the most abundant, while academic jobs consisted of only 10% of today's job market. The most common skills required across sectors were a strong disciplinary background, followed by analytical and technical skills. Academic postings differed the most from the other postings, emphasizing teaching as a top skill. Non-academic jobs emphasized the need for excellent written and oral communication, as well as project management experience. Furthermore, we found distinct differences across job locations, with postings of developing economies emphasizing language and interpersonal skills, while advanced economic countries positions focused on publication history and technical skills. Our results were corroborated through interviews with current conservation professionals. Finally, we provide a sample list of recommended conservation based training programs. Using the results of this study, young scientists will be better able to tailor their training to maximize success in today's conservation-based job market. Similarly, institutions can apply this information to create educational programs that produce graduates primed for long-term success.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The high demand for conservation-based work is creating a need for conservation-focused training of current and future graduate students. While many graduates with tertiary degrees in biology are finding careers outside of academia, many programs and mentors continue to prepare students to follow in the footsteps of their professors. Unfortunately, information regarding how to appropriately prepare for today's job market and find success in conservation careers is limited in detail and scope. This problem is further complicated by the differing needs of conservation positions distributed among diverse employers in both economically advanced and developing regions across the globe. To help young scientists identify the tools needed for conservation positions worldwide, we review the current global conservation job market and identify skills required for success in academic, governmental, nonprofit, and private positions. We found that positions in nonprofit organizations are the most abundant, while academic jobs consisted of only 10% of today's job market. The most common skills required across sectors were a strong disciplinary background, followed by analytical and technical skills. Academic postings differed the most from the other postings, emphasizing teaching as a top skill. Non-academic jobs emphasized the need for excellent written and oral communication, as well as project management experience. Furthermore, we found distinct differences across job locations, with postings of developing economies emphasizing language and interpersonal skills, while advanced economic countries positions focused on publication history and technical skills. Our results were corroborated through interviews with current conservation professionals. Finally, we provide a sample list of recommended conservation based training programs. Using the results of this study, young scientists will be better able to tailor their training to maximize success in today's conservation-based job market. Similarly, institutions can apply this information to create educational programs that produce graduates primed for long-term success.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12950" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using a Bayesian network to clarify areas requiring research in a host-pathogen system</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12950</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using a Bayesian network to clarify areas requiring research in a host-pathogen system</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. S. Bower, K. Mengersen, R. A. Alford, L. Schwarzkopf</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-02T10:56:52.897785-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12950</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12950</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12950</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Bayesian network analyses can integrate complex relationships to examine a range of hypotheses and identify areas that lack associated empirical studies, to prioritise future research. We examined complex relationships in host and pathogen biology to examine disease-driven decline by the amphibian chytrid fungus, <em>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd)</em>, a pathogen that is reducing amphibian biodiversity globally. We constructed a Bayesian network consisting of a range of behavioural, genetic, physiological, and environmental variables that influence disease, and used them to predict host population trends (the variable ‘Population trend’ which could be declining or stable). The behaviour of the nodes (the way in which the variables probabilistically responded to changes in states of the parents, which are the nodes or variables that directly influenced them in the graphical model) in our model was consistent with published results, suggesting that the construction of our model reflected the complex relationships characteristic of host-pathogen interactions. We varied the impacts of specific variables in the model, to reveal factors with the most influence on host population trend. Changes to climatic conditions alone did not strongly influence the probability of population decline, suggesting that epidemics in this system do not occur solely because of climate, but instead interacted with other factors such as the capacity of the frog immune system to suppress disease. The effect of the adaptive immune system and disease reservoirs were important to the population trend, but there was little empirical information available for model construction: we suggest research in these areas will aid understanding of chytridiomycosis-induced declines. We include the input of our full model as a base that can be used to understand other systems, and we demonstrate that such analyses are useful tools for reviewing existing literature and identifying links poorly supported by evidence, and for understanding complexities in emerging infectious disease systems.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Bayesian network analyses can integrate complex relationships to examine a range of hypotheses and identify areas that lack associated empirical studies, to prioritise future research. We examined complex relationships in host and pathogen biology to examine disease-driven decline by the amphibian chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), a pathogen that is reducing amphibian biodiversity globally. We constructed a Bayesian network consisting of a range of behavioural, genetic, physiological, and environmental variables that influence disease, and used them to predict host population trends (the variable ‘Population trend’ which could be declining or stable). The behaviour of the nodes (the way in which the variables probabilistically responded to changes in states of the parents, which are the nodes or variables that directly influenced them in the graphical model) in our model was consistent with published results, suggesting that the construction of our model reflected the complex relationships characteristic of host-pathogen interactions. We varied the impacts of specific variables in the model, to reveal factors with the most influence on host population trend. Changes to climatic conditions alone did not strongly influence the probability of population decline, suggesting that epidemics in this system do not occur solely because of climate, but instead interacted with other factors such as the capacity of the frog immune system to suppress disease. The effect of the adaptive immune system and disease reservoirs were important to the population trend, but there was little empirical information available for model construction: we suggest research in these areas will aid understanding of chytridiomycosis-induced declines. We include the input of our full model as a base that can be used to understand other systems, and we demonstrate that such analyses are useful tools for reviewing existing literature and identifying links poorly supported by evidence, and for understanding complexities in emerging infectious disease systems.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12952" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Quantifying the conservation gains from shared access to linear infrastructure</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12952</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Quantifying the conservation gains from shared access to linear infrastructure</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire A. Runge, Ayesha I. T. Tulloch, Ascelin Gordon, Jonathan R. Rhodes</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-02T10:56:49.117755-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12952</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12952</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12952</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The proliferation of linear infrastructure such as roads and rail is a major global driver of cumulative biodiversity loss. Creative interventions to minimise the impacts of this infrastructure whilst still allowing development to meet human population growth and resource consumption demands are urgently required. One strategy for reducing habitat loss associated with development is to encourage linear infrastructure providers and users to share infrastructure networks. Here we quantify the reductions in biodiversity impact and capital cost under linear infrastructure sharing and demonstrate this approach with a case study in South Australia. By evaluating proposed mine-port links we show that shared development of linear infrastructure could reduce overall biodiversity impacts by up to 75%. We found that such reductions are likely to be limited if the dominant mining companies restrict access to infrastructure, a situation likely to occur without policy to promote sharing of infrastructure. Our research helps illuminate the circumstances under which infrastructure sharing can minimise the biodiversity impacts of development.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The proliferation of linear infrastructure such as roads and rail is a major global driver of cumulative biodiversity loss. Creative interventions to minimise the impacts of this infrastructure whilst still allowing development to meet human population growth and resource consumption demands are urgently required. One strategy for reducing habitat loss associated with development is to encourage linear infrastructure providers and users to share infrastructure networks. Here we quantify the reductions in biodiversity impact and capital cost under linear infrastructure sharing and demonstrate this approach with a case study in South Australia. By evaluating proposed mine-port links we show that shared development of linear infrastructure could reduce overall biodiversity impacts by up to 75%. We found that such reductions are likely to be limited if the dominant mining companies restrict access to infrastructure, a situation likely to occur without policy to promote sharing of infrastructure. Our research helps illuminate the circumstances under which infrastructure sharing can minimise the biodiversity impacts of development.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12948" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Global patterns and trends in human-wildlife conflict compensation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12948</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Global patterns and trends in human-wildlife conflict compensation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Ravenelle, Philip J. Nyhus</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-25T03:53:51.884237-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12948</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12948</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12948</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Human—wildlife conflict is a major conservation challenge, and compensation for wildlife damage is a widely used economic tool to mitigate this conflict. The effectiveness of this management tool is widely debated. The relative importance of factors associated with compensation success is unclear and little is known about global geographic or taxonomic differences in the application of compensation programs. We carried out a review of the compensation scholarship to examine geographic and taxonomic gaps, analyze patterns of positive and negative comments related to compensation, and assess the relative magnitude of global compensation payments. We analyzed 288 publications referencing wildlife compensation and identified 138 unique compensation programs. These publications reported US$222 million after adjusting for inflation spent on compensation in 50 countries since 1980. Europe was the continent with the most papers and the most reported funding, and wolves and bears were the most frequently compensated target of conflict. Authors of the publications we reviewed made twice as many negative comments compared to positive comments regarding compensation. Three quarters of the negative comments related to program administration. Conversely, three quarters of the positive comments related to program outcomes. The three most common suggestions to improve compensation programs included requiring claimants to employ damage prevention practices, such as improving livestock husbandry or fencing in crops in order to receive compensation (n = 25, 15%); modifying <em>ex post</em> compensation schemes to some form of outcome-based performance payment (n = 21, 12%); and altering programs to make compensation payments more quickly (n = 14, 8%). We suggest that further understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of compensation as a conflict mitigation tool will require more systematic evaluation of the factors driving these opinions, and that differentiating process and outcomes and understanding linkages between them will result in more fruitful analyses and ultimately more effective conflict mitigation.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Human—wildlife conflict is a major conservation challenge, and compensation for wildlife damage is a widely used economic tool to mitigate this conflict. The effectiveness of this management tool is widely debated. The relative importance of factors associated with compensation success is unclear and little is known about global geographic or taxonomic differences in the application of compensation programs. We carried out a review of the compensation scholarship to examine geographic and taxonomic gaps, analyze patterns of positive and negative comments related to compensation, and assess the relative magnitude of global compensation payments. We analyzed 288 publications referencing wildlife compensation and identified 138 unique compensation programs. These publications reported US$222 million after adjusting for inflation spent on compensation in 50 countries since 1980. Europe was the continent with the most papers and the most reported funding, and wolves and bears were the most frequently compensated target of conflict. Authors of the publications we reviewed made twice as many negative comments compared to positive comments regarding compensation. Three quarters of the negative comments related to program administration. Conversely, three quarters of the positive comments related to program outcomes. The three most common suggestions to improve compensation programs included requiring claimants to employ damage prevention practices, such as improving livestock husbandry or fencing in crops in order to receive compensation (n = 25, 15%); modifying ex post compensation schemes to some form of outcome-based performance payment (n = 21, 12%); and altering programs to make compensation payments more quickly (n = 14, 8%). We suggest that further understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of compensation as a conflict mitigation tool will require more systematic evaluation of the factors driving these opinions, and that differentiating process and outcomes and understanding linkages between them will result in more fruitful analyses and ultimately more effective conflict mitigation.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12944" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Trends in anecdotal fox sightings in Tasmania accounted for by psychological factors</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12944</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trends in anecdotal fox sightings in Tasmania accounted for by psychological factors</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive A. Marks, Malcolm Clark, David Obendorf, Graham P. Hall, Inês Soares, Filipe Pereira</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-06T11:50:43.540288-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12944</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12944</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12944</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>There has been little evaluation of anecdotal sightings as a means to confirm new incursions of invasive species. This paper explores the potential for equivocal information communicated by the media to account for patterns of anecdotal reports. In 2001 it was widely reported that red foxes (<em>Vulpes vulpes</em>) had been deliberately released in the island state of Tasmania (Australia), although this claim was later revealed to be baseless. Regardless, by 2013 a total of 3153 anecdotal fox sightings had been reported by members of the public and this implied the wide distribution of foxes. Between 2001–2003 a monthly media index (<em>MMI</em>) for fox-related stories was significantly linked to 15 equivocal claims (<em>Monthly Claims</em>) of physical evidence used to support the existence of a putative fox population (<em>P</em> = 0.001). Fluctuations in monthly anecdotal fox sightings were modelled by <em>MMI</em>, <em>Monthly Claims</em> and <em>Year</em> far more convincingly than biophysical factors describing seasonal changes in fox abundance and photoperiod (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). An annual index of fox media from 2001–2010 was also strongly associated with the yearly tally of anecdotal sightings (<em>P</em> = 0.018). The odds-ratio of sightings ranked as reliable by the fox program in any year decreased exponentially at rate 0.00643 as the total number of sightings increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and was indicative of an observer-expectancy bias. Our results suggest that anecdotal sightings are highly susceptible to cognitive biases and when used to qualify species presence can contribute to flawed risk assessments. Data of known quality and precision are required to reliably confirm a unique invasive species incursion.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

There has been little evaluation of anecdotal sightings as a means to confirm new incursions of invasive species. This paper explores the potential for equivocal information communicated by the media to account for patterns of anecdotal reports. In 2001 it was widely reported that red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) had been deliberately released in the island state of Tasmania (Australia), although this claim was later revealed to be baseless. Regardless, by 2013 a total of 3153 anecdotal fox sightings had been reported by members of the public and this implied the wide distribution of foxes. Between 2001–2003 a monthly media index (MMI) for fox-related stories was significantly linked to 15 equivocal claims (Monthly Claims) of physical evidence used to support the existence of a putative fox population (P = 0.001). Fluctuations in monthly anecdotal fox sightings were modelled by MMI, Monthly Claims and Year far more convincingly than biophysical factors describing seasonal changes in fox abundance and photoperiod (P &lt; 0.0001). An annual index of fox media from 2001–2010 was also strongly associated with the yearly tally of anecdotal sightings (P = 0.018). The odds-ratio of sightings ranked as reliable by the fox program in any year decreased exponentially at rate 0.00643 as the total number of sightings increased (P &lt; 0.0001) and was indicative of an observer-expectancy bias. Our results suggest that anecdotal sightings are highly susceptible to cognitive biases and when used to qualify species presence can contribute to flawed risk assessments. Data of known quality and precision are required to reliably confirm a unique invasive species incursion.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12941" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A condition metric for Eucalyptus woodland derived from expert evaluations</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12941</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A condition metric for Eucalyptus woodland derived from expert evaluations</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve J. Sinclair, Matthew J. Bruce, Peter Griffioen, Amanda Dodd, Matthew D. White</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-31T09:50:23.977812-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12941</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12941</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12941</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The evaluation of ecosystem quality is important for land management and land-use planning.  Evaluation is unavoidably subjective, and robust metrics must be based on consensus and the structured use of observations.  This paper presents a means of building and testing metrics based on expert evaluation data, using a transparent and repeatable process.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We gather quantitative evaluation data from a defined expert group, about the quality of synthetic (fictional) grassy woodland sites.  We use these data to train a model (an ensemble of thirty bagged regression trees) capable of predicting the perceived quality of similar synthetic woodlands using a set of thirteen site variables as inputs. These variables can be measured at any site, and the model implemented in a spreadsheet as a metric of woodland quality.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We demonstrate that the model produces evaluations that are similar to those provided by experts.  We also investigated the number of experts required to produce a stable metric, and showed that our use of 44 experts was sufficient.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>To test the metric's performance in the real world, we applied it to thirteen woodland conservation reserves on the periphery of Melbourne, Australia, and asked the managers of these sites to independently evaluate their quality.  We assessed metric performance by quantifying its ability to match the mean evaluation of the managers for each site, and comparing this with the ability of each manager in turn to match the mean of the remaining evaluators.  The metric performed relatively well.  Given it brings the benefits of consensus and repeatability, which no human evaluator can demonstrate, we suggest that the metric is a valuable tool for making evaluations in the real-world context where accountability is required.  The basic approaches of development and testing that we demonstrate are applicable to any ecosystem.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The evaluation of ecosystem quality is important for land management and land-use planning.  Evaluation is unavoidably subjective, and robust metrics must be based on consensus and the structured use of observations.  This paper presents a means of building and testing metrics based on expert evaluation data, using a transparent and repeatable process.
We gather quantitative evaluation data from a defined expert group, about the quality of synthetic (fictional) grassy woodland sites.  We use these data to train a model (an ensemble of thirty bagged regression trees) capable of predicting the perceived quality of similar synthetic woodlands using a set of thirteen site variables as inputs. These variables can be measured at any site, and the model implemented in a spreadsheet as a metric of woodland quality.
We demonstrate that the model produces evaluations that are similar to those provided by experts.  We also investigated the number of experts required to produce a stable metric, and showed that our use of 44 experts was sufficient.
To test the metric's performance in the real world, we applied it to thirteen woodland conservation reserves on the periphery of Melbourne, Australia, and asked the managers of these sites to independently evaluate their quality.  We assessed metric performance by quantifying its ability to match the mean evaluation of the managers for each site, and comparing this with the ability of each manager in turn to match the mean of the remaining evaluators.  The metric performed relatively well.  Given it brings the benefits of consensus and repeatability, which no human evaluator can demonstrate, we suggest that the metric is a valuable tool for making evaluations in the real-world context where accountability is required.  The basic approaches of development and testing that we demonstrate are applicable to any ecosystem.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12940" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Historical spatial reconstruction of a spawning aggregation fishery</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12940</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Historical spatial reconstruction of a spawning aggregation fishery</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sarah M. Buckley, Ruth H. Thurstan, Andrew Tobin, John M. Pandolfi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-29T06:50:48.255178-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12940</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12940</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12940</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Aggregations forming for breeding are a critical ecological process for many species, yet these aggregations are also inherently vulnerable to exploitation. Documenting the decline of exploited populations that form breeding aggregations is becoming increasingly common, but studies tend to focus upon catch rate, often overlooking reductions in geographic range. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that catch rate and occupancy of exploited fish spawning aggregations (FSAs) decline in synchrony over time. We used the Spanish mackerel (<em>Scomberomorus commerson</em>) spawning aggregation fishery in the Great Barrier Reef as a case study. Data were compiled from historical newspaper archives, fisher knowledge and contemporary fishery logbooks to reconstruct catch rates and exploitation trends from the inception of the fishery. Our fine-scale analysis of catch and effort data spanned a 103-year period (1911–2013) and revealed a spatial expansion of fishing effort, with effort shifting offshore at a rate of 9.4 nm decade<sup>-1</sup>, and 2.9 newly targeted FSA reported decade<sup>-1</sup>. Spatial expansion masked the sequential exploitation, commercial extinction, and loss of 70% of exploited FSAs. After standardizing for improvements in technological innovations, average catch rates declined by 70% between 1934 and 2011 (from 119.4 to 35.3 fish vessel<sup>-1</sup> trip<sup>-1</sup>). Spanish mackerel did not exhibit a significant relationship between mean catch rate and occupancy of exploited FSAs. Our study reveals a special kind of shifting spatial baselines, where a contraction in exploited FSAs occurred undetected. Knowing the temporal and spatial explicit information of FSAs can be relevant for the conservation and management of FSA species.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Aggregations forming for breeding are a critical ecological process for many species, yet these aggregations are also inherently vulnerable to exploitation. Documenting the decline of exploited populations that form breeding aggregations is becoming increasingly common, but studies tend to focus upon catch rate, often overlooking reductions in geographic range. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that catch rate and occupancy of exploited fish spawning aggregations (FSAs) decline in synchrony over time. We used the Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson) spawning aggregation fishery in the Great Barrier Reef as a case study. Data were compiled from historical newspaper archives, fisher knowledge and contemporary fishery logbooks to reconstruct catch rates and exploitation trends from the inception of the fishery. Our fine-scale analysis of catch and effort data spanned a 103-year period (1911–2013) and revealed a spatial expansion of fishing effort, with effort shifting offshore at a rate of 9.4 nm decade-1, and 2.9 newly targeted FSA reported decade-1. Spatial expansion masked the sequential exploitation, commercial extinction, and loss of 70% of exploited FSAs. After standardizing for improvements in technological innovations, average catch rates declined by 70% between 1934 and 2011 (from 119.4 to 35.3 fish vessel-1 trip-1). Spanish mackerel did not exhibit a significant relationship between mean catch rate and occupancy of exploited FSAs. Our study reveals a special kind of shifting spatial baselines, where a contraction in exploited FSAs occurred undetected. Knowing the temporal and spatial explicit information of FSAs can be relevant for the conservation and management of FSA species.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12939" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Integrated models to support multiobjective ecological restoration decisions</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12939</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Integrated models to support multiobjective ecological restoration decisions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hannah Fraser, Libby Rumpff, Jian D. L. Yen, Doug Robinson, Brendan A. Wintle</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-24T10:25:29.16399-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12939</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12939</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12939</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Many objectives motivate ecological restoration including improving vegetation condition, increasing the range and abundance of threatened species, and improving aggregate measures of biodiversity such as richness and diversity. While ecological models have been used to examine the outcomes of ecological restoration, there are few attempts to develop models to account for multiple, potentially competing objectives. We develop the first predictive model that integrates a vegetation-focused state-and-transition model with species distribution models for birds. We demonstrate how this integrated model can be used to identify effective restoration options for vegetation and bird species under a constrained budget. For example, using a typical agricultural land management scenario from south-eastern Australia, we demonstrate how the optimal management actions for promoting the occurrence of the Brown Treecreeper, an iconic threatened species, may be suboptimal for meeting vegetation condition objectives. This highlights that any ‘preferred’ management decision depends on the value assigned to the different objectives. An exploration of sensitivity to value weightings highlighted that ‘no management’ or ‘weed control’ were most likely to be the best management options to meet multiple objectives in the scenario we explored. We thus illustrate an approach to using the model outputs to explore trade-offs between bird and vegetation objectives. Our approach to exploring management outcomes and trade-offs using integrated modelling and structured decision support approaches has wide application for conservation management problems in which trade-offs exist between competing objectives.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Many objectives motivate ecological restoration including improving vegetation condition, increasing the range and abundance of threatened species, and improving aggregate measures of biodiversity such as richness and diversity. While ecological models have been used to examine the outcomes of ecological restoration, there are few attempts to develop models to account for multiple, potentially competing objectives. We develop the first predictive model that integrates a vegetation-focused state-and-transition model with species distribution models for birds. We demonstrate how this integrated model can be used to identify effective restoration options for vegetation and bird species under a constrained budget. For example, using a typical agricultural land management scenario from south-eastern Australia, we demonstrate how the optimal management actions for promoting the occurrence of the Brown Treecreeper, an iconic threatened species, may be suboptimal for meeting vegetation condition objectives. This highlights that any ‘preferred’ management decision depends on the value assigned to the different objectives. An exploration of sensitivity to value weightings highlighted that ‘no management’ or ‘weed control’ were most likely to be the best management options to meet multiple objectives in the scenario we explored. We thus illustrate an approach to using the model outputs to explore trade-offs between bird and vegetation objectives. Our approach to exploring management outcomes and trade-offs using integrated modelling and structured decision support approaches has wide application for conservation management problems in which trade-offs exist between competing objectives.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12937" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Conservation and the four Rs, which are rescue, rehabilitation, release, and research</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12937</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conservation and the four Rs, which are rescue, rehabilitation, release, and research</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graham H. Pyke, Judit K. Szabo</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-22T09:51:50.644524-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12937</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12937</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12937</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Vertebrate animals can be injured or threatened with injury through human activities, thus warranting their ‘rescue’. Details of wildlife Rescue, Rehabilitation, Release, and associated Research (our 4 R's) are often recorded in large databases, resulting in a wealth of information. This information has huge research potential and can contribute to our understanding of animal biology, anthropogenic impacts on wildlife, and species conservation. However, such databases have been little used, few studies have evaluated factors influencing success of rehabilitation and/or release, recommended actions to conserve threatened species have rarely arisen, and direct benefits for species conservation are yet to be demonstrated. We therefore recommend additional research based on rescue, rehabilitation and release of animals, broader in scope than previously carried out, which would also maintain support from the general human community.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Vertebrate animals can be injured or threatened with injury through human activities, thus warranting their ‘rescue’. Details of wildlife Rescue, Rehabilitation, Release, and associated Research (our 4 R's) are often recorded in large databases, resulting in a wealth of information. This information has huge research potential and can contribute to our understanding of animal biology, anthropogenic impacts on wildlife, and species conservation. However, such databases have been little used, few studies have evaluated factors influencing success of rehabilitation and/or release, recommended actions to conserve threatened species have rarely arisen, and direct benefits for species conservation are yet to be demonstrated. We therefore recommend additional research based on rescue, rehabilitation and release of animals, broader in scope than previously carried out, which would also maintain support from the general human community.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12930" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Critically evaluating best management practices for preventing freshwater turtle extinctions</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12930</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Critically evaluating best management practices for preventing freshwater turtle extinctions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R.J. Spencer, J.U. Dyke, Michael B. Thompson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-20T12:52:36.631759-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12930</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12930</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12930</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><em>Ex situ</em> conservation tools, such as captive breeding for reintroduction, are considered last resort to help recover threatened or endangered species. However, they may also provide alternative strategies where reducing threats directly is difficult or ineffective. Headstarting, or captive rearing of eggs or neonate animals and subsequent release into the wild, has been controversial for decades. A major criticism is that headstarting is a symptomatic treatment of conservation problems (halfway technology), however, it may provide a mechanism to address multiple threats, particularly in close proximity of population centres. Here we conduct Population Viability Analyses (PVA) to assess the risk of extinction of Australia's most widespread freshwater turtle, <em>Chelodina longicollis</em>, to increasing adult road mortality and reduced recruitment through nest predation from introduced foxes. We also model a range of management scenarios to test the effectiveness of headstarting, fox management, and measures that reduce adult road mortality. We show that headstarting should be a primary tool for managing freshwater turtles under threats that affect multiple life history stages. Headstarting from harvest populations were the only scenarios that eliminated all risks of extinction, while also maintaining population growth. Small increments in adult mortality have greatest effect on population growth and extinction risk, however, where threats simultaneously affect other life history stages (e.g.. recruitment), eliminating harvest pressures on adult females alone will not eliminate the risk of population extinction. In our models, one harvest population could supply enough hatchlings to supplement 25 other similar sized populations at an annual rate to maintain population growth and eliminate the risk of population extinction. We advocate the creation of harvest populations for managing freshwater turtles facing significant threats to multiple life history stages.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Ex situ conservation tools, such as captive breeding for reintroduction, are considered last resort to help recover threatened or endangered species. However, they may also provide alternative strategies where reducing threats directly is difficult or ineffective. Headstarting, or captive rearing of eggs or neonate animals and subsequent release into the wild, has been controversial for decades. A major criticism is that headstarting is a symptomatic treatment of conservation problems (halfway technology), however, it may provide a mechanism to address multiple threats, particularly in close proximity of population centres. Here we conduct Population Viability Analyses (PVA) to assess the risk of extinction of Australia's most widespread freshwater turtle, Chelodina longicollis, to increasing adult road mortality and reduced recruitment through nest predation from introduced foxes. We also model a range of management scenarios to test the effectiveness of headstarting, fox management, and measures that reduce adult road mortality. We show that headstarting should be a primary tool for managing freshwater turtles under threats that affect multiple life history stages. Headstarting from harvest populations were the only scenarios that eliminated all risks of extinction, while also maintaining population growth. Small increments in adult mortality have greatest effect on population growth and extinction risk, however, where threats simultaneously affect other life history stages (e.g.. recruitment), eliminating harvest pressures on adult females alone will not eliminate the risk of population extinction. In our models, one harvest population could supply enough hatchlings to supplement 25 other similar sized populations at an annual rate to maintain population growth and eliminate the risk of population extinction. We advocate the creation of harvest populations for managing freshwater turtles facing significant threats to multiple life history stages.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12923" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Defining ecologically relevant scales for spatial protection with long-term data on an endangered seabird and local prey availability</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12923</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Defining ecologically relevant scales for spatial protection with long-term data on an endangered seabird and local prey availability</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard B. Sherley, Philna Botha, Les G. Underhill, Peter G. Ryan, Danie Zyl, Andrew C. Cockcroft, Robert J.M. Crawford, Bruce M. Dyer, Timothée R. Cook</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-01T11:50:28.039407-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12923</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12923</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12923</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Human activities are important drivers of marine ecosystem functioning. However, separating the synergistic effects of fishing and environmental variability on the prey base of non-target predators is difficult, often because prey availability estimates on appropriate scales are lacking. Understanding how prey abundance at different spatial scales links to population change can help integrate the needs of non-target predators into fisheries management by defining ecologically-relevant areas for spatial protection. We investigated the local population response (number of breeders) of the bank cormorant <em>Phalacrocorax neglectus</em>, a range-restricted endangered seabird, to the availability of its prey, the heavily-fished west coast rock lobster <em>Jasus lalandii</em>. Using Bayesian state-space modeled cormorant counts at three colonies, 22 years of fisheries-independent data on local lobster abundance and generalized additive modeling, we determined the spatial-scale pertinent to these relationships in areas of differing lobster availability. Cormorant numbers responded positively to lobster availability in the intermediate and high abundance regions, but not where regime shifts and fishing pressure have depleted lobster stocks. The relationships were strongest at 20–30 km, greater than the cormorants’ foraging range when breeding, and may have been influence by prey availability for non-breeding birds, prey switching or prey ecology. Our results highlight the importance of considering the scale of ecological relationships in marine spatial planning and suggest that designing spatial protection around focal species can benefit marine predators across their full life cycle. We propose the precautionary implementation of small-scale marine protected areas, followed by robust assessment and adaptive-management, to confirm population-level benefits for the cormorants, their prey and the wider ecosystem, without negative impacts on local fisheries.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Human activities are important drivers of marine ecosystem functioning. However, separating the synergistic effects of fishing and environmental variability on the prey base of non-target predators is difficult, often because prey availability estimates on appropriate scales are lacking. Understanding how prey abundance at different spatial scales links to population change can help integrate the needs of non-target predators into fisheries management by defining ecologically-relevant areas for spatial protection. We investigated the local population response (number of breeders) of the bank cormorant Phalacrocorax neglectus, a range-restricted endangered seabird, to the availability of its prey, the heavily-fished west coast rock lobster Jasus lalandii. Using Bayesian state-space modeled cormorant counts at three colonies, 22 years of fisheries-independent data on local lobster abundance and generalized additive modeling, we determined the spatial-scale pertinent to these relationships in areas of differing lobster availability. Cormorant numbers responded positively to lobster availability in the intermediate and high abundance regions, but not where regime shifts and fishing pressure have depleted lobster stocks. The relationships were strongest at 20–30 km, greater than the cormorants’ foraging range when breeding, and may have been influence by prey availability for non-breeding birds, prey switching or prey ecology. Our results highlight the importance of considering the scale of ecological relationships in marine spatial planning and suggest that designing spatial protection around focal species can benefit marine predators across their full life cycle. We propose the precautionary implementation of small-scale marine protected areas, followed by robust assessment and adaptive-management, to confirm population-level benefits for the cormorants, their prey and the wider ecosystem, without negative impacts on local fisheries.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12921" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Conservation genomics of the endangered Burmese roofed turtle</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12921</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Conservation genomics of the endangered Burmese roofed turtle</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">F. Gözde Çilingir, Frank E. Rheindt, Kritika M. Garg, Kalyar Platt, Steven G. Platt, David P. Bickford</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-28T09:20:25.811766-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12921</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12921</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12921</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The Burmese roofed turtle (<em>Batagur trivittata</em>) is one of the world's most endangered turtles. Only one wild population remains in Myanmar. Based on field observations, wild breeders are thought to number around a dozen. Combined <em>in-situ</em> and <em>ex-situ</em> conservation efforts for the species have raised &gt;700 captive turtles over a decade predominantly from wild collected eggs. In one of the most comprehensive studies bridging genomic methodologies with active <em>in-situ</em> and <em>ex-situ</em> conservation efforts, we obtained ∼1500 unlinked genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from ∼40% of the turtles’ remaining global population. We found that individuals fall into five distinct genetic clusters, four of which represent full-sib families. We inferred a low effective population size (≤10) but did not detect signs of severe inbreeding, possibly because the population bottleneck has only happened recently. Based on genetic diversity, we identified two groups of 30 individuals from the captive pool that were subsequently reintroduced, leading to an increase in breeding success in the wild. Another 25 individuals, selected <em>via</em> the same criteria, were transferred to Singapore Zoo as an assurance colony. Our study demonstrates that the research-to-application gap in conservation can be bridged by successful agency-academic collaboration and through rigorous application of sound genomic methodologies.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The Burmese roofed turtle (Batagur trivittata) is one of the world's most endangered turtles. Only one wild population remains in Myanmar. Based on field observations, wild breeders are thought to number around a dozen. Combined in-situ and ex-situ conservation efforts for the species have raised &gt;700 captive turtles over a decade predominantly from wild collected eggs. In one of the most comprehensive studies bridging genomic methodologies with active in-situ and ex-situ conservation efforts, we obtained ∼1500 unlinked genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from ∼40% of the turtles’ remaining global population. We found that individuals fall into five distinct genetic clusters, four of which represent full-sib families. We inferred a low effective population size (≤10) but did not detect signs of severe inbreeding, possibly because the population bottleneck has only happened recently. Based on genetic diversity, we identified two groups of 30 individuals from the captive pool that were subsequently reintroduced, leading to an increase in breeding success in the wild. Another 25 individuals, selected via the same criteria, were transferred to Singapore Zoo as an assurance colony. Our study demonstrates that the research-to-application gap in conservation can be bridged by successful agency-academic collaboration and through rigorous application of sound genomic methodologies.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12917" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>How economic contexts shape calculations of “yield” in biodiversity offsetting</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12917</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">How economic contexts shape calculations of “yield” in biodiversity offsetting</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L. Carver, S. Sullivan</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-24T08:20:42.012292-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12917</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12917</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12917</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This paper describes and analyses applied practices creating numerical equivalence between sites of development impact and proposed conservation offset sites in the new conservation technology of biodiversity offsetting. Application of biodiversity offsetting metrics in development impact and mitigation assessments is considered to standardize biodiversity conservation outcomes, sometimes termed ‘biodiversity yield’ by consultants conducting these calculations. The youth of biodiversity offsetting in application, however, means that little is known about how biodiversity valuations and offset contracts between development and offset sites are agreed in practice, or the long-term implications for conservation outcomes. We respond to the first of these gaps in particular by demonstrating how sites were made commensurable and biodiversity gains or yields were calculated and negotiated for a specific offset contract in a government-led pilot study into biodiversity offsets in England. Observations over 24 months were based on repeat site visits, 50 transcribed semi-structured interviews subjected to textual analysis using a qualitative data analysis computer software programme, and review of biodiversity offsetting calculation spreadsheets and planning documents. The technical calculations made and negotiated in different iterations of a specific Biodiversity Impact Assessment using the biodiversity offsetting metric developed by the UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs constitute a particular focus of the paper. We highlight three main findings. First, biodiversity offsetting metrics are being amended in creative ways as users adapt inputs to metric calculations to balance and negotiate conflicting requirements. Second, the practice of making different habitats equivalent to each other through the application of biodiversity offsetting metrics is giving rise to commensuration outcomes that may be questionable in terms of projected conservation outcomes. Third, the pressure of creating value for money in compensation strategies for conservation can diminish conservation ‘yields’ in the competitive search for less expensive mitigation options.</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

This paper describes and analyses applied practices creating numerical equivalence between sites of development impact and proposed conservation offset sites in the new conservation technology of biodiversity offsetting. Application of biodiversity offsetting metrics in development impact and mitigation assessments is considered to standardize biodiversity conservation outcomes, sometimes termed ‘biodiversity yield’ by consultants conducting these calculations. The youth of biodiversity offsetting in application, however, means that little is known about how biodiversity valuations and offset contracts between development and offset sites are agreed in practice, or the long-term implications for conservation outcomes. We respond to the first of these gaps in particular by demonstrating how sites were made commensurable and biodiversity gains or yields were calculated and negotiated for a specific offset contract in a government-led pilot study into biodiversity offsets in England. Observations over 24 months were based on repeat site visits, 50 transcribed semi-structured interviews subjected to textual analysis using a qualitative data analysis computer software programme, and review of biodiversity offsetting calculation spreadsheets and planning documents. The technical calculations made and negotiated in different iterations of a specific Biodiversity Impact Assessment using the biodiversity offsetting metric developed by the UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs constitute a particular focus of the paper. We highlight three main findings. First, biodiversity offsetting metrics are being amended in creative ways as users adapt inputs to metric calculations to balance and negotiate conflicting requirements. Second, the practice of making different habitats equivalent to each other through the application of biodiversity offsetting metrics is giving rise to commensuration outcomes that may be questionable in terms of projected conservation outcomes. Third, the pressure of creating value for money in compensation strategies for conservation can diminish conservation ‘yields’ in the competitive search for less expensive mitigation options.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12902" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Need for conservation planning in postconflict Colombia</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12902</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Need for conservation planning in postconflict Colombia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pablo Jose Negret, James Allan, Alexander Braczkowski, Martine Maron, James E.M. Watson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-03T00:25:25.21975-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12902</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12902</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12902</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Letter</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>More than 80% of recent major armed conflicts have taken place in biodiversity hotspots, including the Tropical Andes which is home to the world's highest concentrations of bird, mammal, and amphibian species, and more than ten percent of all vascular plant species (Mittermeier et al. 2004; Hanson et al. 2009). Armed conflicts not only seriously impact social and political systems, but also have important ramifications for biodiversity, from the time preparations for conflict start through to the post-conflict period (Machlis &amp; Hanson 2008). Tropical forests have been identified as particularly vulnerable during the post-conflict period, when areas made inaccessible during hostilities become open to development (McNeely 2003).</p></div>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

More than 80% of recent major armed conflicts have taken place in biodiversity hotspots, including the Tropical Andes which is home to the world's highest concentrations of bird, mammal, and amphibian species, and more than ten percent of all vascular plant species (Mittermeier et al. 2004; Hanson et al. 2009). Armed conflicts not only seriously impact social and political systems, but also have important ramifications for biodiversity, from the time preparations for conflict start through to the post-conflict period (Machlis &amp; Hanson 2008). Tropical forests have been identified as particularly vulnerable during the post-conflict period, when areas made inaccessible during hostilities become open to development (McNeely 2003).
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12943" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12943</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cécile H. Albert, Bronwyn Rayfield, Maria Dumitru, Andrew Gonzalez</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-31T07:34:01.470867-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12943</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12943</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12943</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Designing connected landscapes is among the most widespread strategies for achieving biodiversity conservation targets. The challenge lies in simultaneously satisfying the connectivity needs of multiple species at multiple spatial scales under uncertain climate and land-use change. To evaluate the contribution of remnant habitat fragments to the connectivity of regional habitat networks, we developed a method to integrate uncertainty in climate and land-use change projections with the latest developments in network-connectivity research and spatial, multipurpose conservation prioritization. We used land-use change simulations to explore robustness of species’ habitat networks to alternative development scenarios. We applied our method to 14 vertebrate focal species of periurban Montreal, Canada. Accounting for connectivity in spatial prioritization strongly modified conservation priorities and the modified priorities were robust to uncertain climate change. Setting conservation priorities based on habitat quality and connectivity maintained a large proportion of the region's connectivity, despite anticipated habitat loss due to climate and land-use change. The application of connectivity criteria alongside habitat-quality criteria for protected-area design was efficient with respect to the amount of area that needs protection and did not necessarily amplify trade-offs among conservation criteria. Our approach and results are being applied in and around Montreal and are well suited to the design of ecological networks and green infrastructure for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in other regions, in particular regions around large cities, where connectivity is critically low.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12943-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Aplicación de la Teoría de Redes para Priorizar las Redes de Hábitats Multiespecies que son Resistentes al Clima y al Cambio de Uso de Suelo</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12943-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El diseño de paisajes conectados está entre las estrategias más utilizadas para alcanzar los objetivos de conservación de la biodiversidad. El reto yace en satisfacer simultáneamente las necesidades de conectividad de especies múltiples a escalas espaciales múltiples bajo el clima y el cambio de uso de suelo incierto. Para evaluar la contribución de los fragmentos de hábitat remanentes a la conectividad de las redes de hábitats regionales desarrollamos un método para integrar la incertidumbre en las proyecciones climáticas y de cambio de uso de suelo a los desarrollos más recientes en la investigación de conectividad de redes y la priorización de la conservación espacial y multipropósito. Usamos las simulaciones de cambio de uso de suelo para explorar la resistencia de las redes de hábitats de especies ante escenarios alternativos de desarrollo. Aplicamos nuestro método a 14 especies focales de vertebrados de la zona periurbana de Montreal, Canadá. Considerar a la conectividad en la priorización espacial modificó fuertemente las prioridades de conservación y las prioridades modificadas fueron resistentes al cambio climático incierto. Establecer las prioridades de conservación con base en la calidad del hábitat y la conectividad mantuvo una gran proporción de la conectividad de la región, a pesar de la pérdida anticipada del hábitat debido al clima y al cambio del uso de suelo. La aplicación de los criterios de conectividad junto con los criterios de calidad de hábitat para el diseño de áreas protegidas fue eficiente con respecto a la cantidad del área que necesita protección y no amplificó necesariamente las compensaciones entre los criterios de conservación. Nuestra estrategia y resultados están siendo aplicados en y alrededor de Montreal y son muy adecuados para el diseño de las redes ecológicas y la infraestructura verde para la conservación de la biodiversidad y los servicios ambientales en otras regiones, en particular en regiones que rodean grandes ciudades y en donde la conectividad es críticamente baja.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Designing connected landscapes is among the most widespread strategies for achieving biodiversity conservation targets. The challenge lies in simultaneously satisfying the connectivity needs of multiple species at multiple spatial scales under uncertain climate and land-use change. To evaluate the contribution of remnant habitat fragments to the connectivity of regional habitat networks, we developed a method to integrate uncertainty in climate and land-use change projections with the latest developments in network-connectivity research and spatial, multipurpose conservation prioritization. We used land-use change simulations to explore robustness of species’ habitat networks to alternative development scenarios. We applied our method to 14 vertebrate focal species of periurban Montreal, Canada. Accounting for connectivity in spatial prioritization strongly modified conservation priorities and the modified priorities were robust to uncertain climate change. Setting conservation priorities based on habitat quality and connectivity maintained a large proportion of the region's connectivity, despite anticipated habitat loss due to climate and land-use change. The application of connectivity criteria alongside habitat-quality criteria for protected-area design was efficient with respect to the amount of area that needs protection and did not necessarily amplify trade-offs among conservation criteria. Our approach and results are being applied in and around Montreal and are well suited to the design of ecological networks and green infrastructure for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in other regions, in particular regions around large cities, where connectivity is critically low.


Aplicación de la Teoría de Redes para Priorizar las Redes de Hábitats Multiespecies que son Resistentes al Clima y al Cambio de Uso de Suelo

Resumen
El diseño de paisajes conectados está entre las estrategias más utilizadas para alcanzar los objetivos de conservación de la biodiversidad. El reto yace en satisfacer simultáneamente las necesidades de conectividad de especies múltiples a escalas espaciales múltiples bajo el clima y el cambio de uso de suelo incierto. Para evaluar la contribución de los fragmentos de hábitat remanentes a la conectividad de las redes de hábitats regionales desarrollamos un método para integrar la incertidumbre en las proyecciones climáticas y de cambio de uso de suelo a los desarrollos más recientes en la investigación de conectividad de redes y la priorización de la conservación espacial y multipropósito. Usamos las simulaciones de cambio de uso de suelo para explorar la resistencia de las redes de hábitats de especies ante escenarios alternativos de desarrollo. Aplicamos nuestro método a 14 especies focales de vertebrados de la zona periurbana de Montreal, Canadá. Considerar a la conectividad en la priorización espacial modificó fuertemente las prioridades de conservación y las prioridades modificadas fueron resistentes al cambio climático incierto. Establecer las prioridades de conservación con base en la calidad del hábitat y la conectividad mantuvo una gran proporción de la conectividad de la región, a pesar de la pérdida anticipada del hábitat debido al clima y al cambio del uso de suelo. La aplicación de los criterios de conectividad junto con los criterios de calidad de hábitat para el diseño de áreas protegidas fue eficiente con respecto a la cantidad del área que necesita protección y no amplificó necesariamente las compensaciones entre los criterios de conservación. Nuestra estrategia y resultados están siendo aplicados en y alrededor de Montreal y son muy adecuados para el diseño de las redes ecológicas y la infraestructura verde para la conservación de la biodiversidad y los servicios ambientales en otras regiones, en particular en regiones que rodean grandes ciudades y en donde la conectividad es críticamente baja.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12947" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12947</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Azadeh Karimi, Ayesha I.T. Tulloch, Greg Brown, Marc Hockings</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-31T07:26:54.766589-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12947</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12947</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12947</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Conservation success is contingent on assessing social and environmental factors so that cost-effective implementation of strategies and actions can be placed in a broad social–ecological context. Until now, the focus has been on how to include spatially explicit social data in conservation planning, whereas the value of different kinds of social data has received limited attention. In a regional systematic conservation planning case study in Australia, we examined the spatial concurrence of a range of spatially explicit social values and land-use preferences collected using a public participation geographic information system and biological data. We used Zonation to integrate the social data with the biological data in a series of spatial-prioritization scenarios to determine the effect of the different types of social data on spatial prioritization compared with biological data alone. The type of social data (i.e., conservation opportunities or constraints) significantly affected spatial prioritization outcomes. The integration of social values and land-use preferences under different scenarios was highly variable and generated spatial prioritizations 1.2–51% different from those based on biological data alone. The inclusion of conservation-compatible values and preferences added relatively few new areas to conservation priorities, whereas including noncompatible economic values and development preferences as costs significantly changed conservation priority areas (48.2% and 47.4%, respectively). Based on our results, a multifaceted conservation prioritization approach that combines spatially explicit social data with biological data can help conservation planners identify the type of social data to collect for more effective and feasible conservation actions.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12947-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Entendimiento de los Efectos de Diferentes Datos Sociales sobre la Selección de Áreas de Conservación Prioritarias</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12947-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El éxito de la conservación es contingente de la valoración tanto de factores sociales como ambientales para que la implementación rentable de las estrategias y acciones pueda ubicarse en un contexto ecológico. Hasta ahora, el enfoque ha sido sobre cómo incluir los datos sociales explícitos espacialmente en la planeación de la conservación, mientras que el valor de los diferentes tipos de datos sociales ha recibido atención limitada. En un estudio de caso de planeación sistemática de la conservación en Australia, examinamos la concurrencia espacial de un rango de valores sociales explícitos espacialmente y las preferencias de uso de suelo recolectadas con el usa de un sistema de información geográfica de participación pública y datos biológicos. Utilizamos Zonation para integrar los datos sociales con los datos biológicos en una serie de escenarios de priorización espacial para determinar el efecto de los diferentes tipos de datos sociales sobre la priorización espacial comparado con solamente los datos biológicos. El tipo de dato social (es decir, las oportunidad o restricciones de conservación) afectó significativamente los resultados de priorización espacial. La integración de los valores sociales y las preferencias de uso de suelo bajo diferentes escenarios fue altamente variable y generó priorizaciones espaciales 1.2 – 51% diferentes de aquellas basadas en solamente los datos biológicos. La inclusión de los valores compatibles con la conservación y de las preferencias añadió relativamente pocas áreas nuevas a las prioridades de conservación, mientras que incluir los valores no-compatibles económicamente y las preferencias de desarrollo como costos cambió significativamente las áreas de conservación prioritarias (48.2% y 47.4%, respectivamente). Con base en nuestros resultados, una estrategia multifacética de priorización de la conservación que combine los datos sociales explícitos espacialmente con los datos biológicos puede ayudar a los planeadores de la conservación a identificar los tipos de datos sociales a recolectar para acciones de conservación más efectivas y factibles.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Conservation success is contingent on assessing social and environmental factors so that cost-effective implementation of strategies and actions can be placed in a broad social–ecological context. Until now, the focus has been on how to include spatially explicit social data in conservation planning, whereas the value of different kinds of social data has received limited attention. In a regional systematic conservation planning case study in Australia, we examined the spatial concurrence of a range of spatially explicit social values and land-use preferences collected using a public participation geographic information system and biological data. We used Zonation to integrate the social data with the biological data in a series of spatial-prioritization scenarios to determine the effect of the different types of social data on spatial prioritization compared with biological data alone. The type of social data (i.e., conservation opportunities or constraints) significantly affected spatial prioritization outcomes. The integration of social values and land-use preferences under different scenarios was highly variable and generated spatial prioritizations 1.2–51% different from those based on biological data alone. The inclusion of conservation-compatible values and preferences added relatively few new areas to conservation priorities, whereas including noncompatible economic values and development preferences as costs significantly changed conservation priority areas (48.2% and 47.4%, respectively). Based on our results, a multifaceted conservation prioritization approach that combines spatially explicit social data with biological data can help conservation planners identify the type of social data to collect for more effective and feasible conservation actions.


Entendimiento de los Efectos de Diferentes Datos Sociales sobre la Selección de Áreas de Conservación Prioritarias

Resumen
El éxito de la conservación es contingente de la valoración tanto de factores sociales como ambientales para que la implementación rentable de las estrategias y acciones pueda ubicarse en un contexto ecológico. Hasta ahora, el enfoque ha sido sobre cómo incluir los datos sociales explícitos espacialmente en la planeación de la conservación, mientras que el valor de los diferentes tipos de datos sociales ha recibido atención limitada. En un estudio de caso de planeación sistemática de la conservación en Australia, examinamos la concurrencia espacial de un rango de valores sociales explícitos espacialmente y las preferencias de uso de suelo recolectadas con el usa de un sistema de información geográfica de participación pública y datos biológicos. Utilizamos Zonation para integrar los datos sociales con los datos biológicos en una serie de escenarios de priorización espacial para determinar el efecto de los diferentes tipos de datos sociales sobre la priorización espacial comparado con solamente los datos biológicos. El tipo de dato social (es decir, las oportunidad o restricciones de conservación) afectó significativamente los resultados de priorización espacial. La integración de los valores sociales y las preferencias de uso de suelo bajo diferentes escenarios fue altamente variable y generó priorizaciones espaciales 1.2 – 51% diferentes de aquellas basadas en solamente los datos biológicos. La inclusión de los valores compatibles con la conservación y de las preferencias añadió relativamente pocas áreas nuevas a las prioridades de conservación, mientras que incluir los valores no-compatibles económicamente y las preferencias de desarrollo como costos cambió significativamente las áreas de conservación prioritarias (48.2% y 47.4%, respectivamente). Con base en nuestros resultados, una estrategia multifacética de priorización de la conservación que combine los datos sociales explícitos espacialmente con los datos biológicos puede ayudar a los planeadores de la conservación a identificar los tipos de datos sociales a recolectar para acciones de conservación más efectivas y factibles.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12922" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Minimizing species extinctions through strategic planning for conservation fencing</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12922</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Minimizing species extinctions through strategic planning for conservation fencing</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy L. Ringma, Brendan Wintle, Richard A. Fuller, Diana Fisher, Michael Bode</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-28T11:06:01.178793-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12922</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12922</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12922</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Conservation fences are an increasingly common management action, particularly for species threatened by invasive predators. However, unlike many conservation actions, fence networks are expanding in an unsystematic manner, generally as a reaction to local funding opportunities or threats. We conducted a gap analysis of Australia's large predator-exclusion fence network by examining translocation of Australian mammals relative to their extinction risk. To address gaps identified in species representation, we devised a systematic prioritization method for expanding the conservation fence network that explicitly incorporated population viability analysis and minimized expected species’ extinctions. The approach was applied to New South Wales, Australia, where the state government intends to expand the existing conservation fence network. Existing protection of species in fenced areas was highly uneven; 67% of predator-sensitive species were unrepresented in the fence network. Our systematic prioritization yielded substantial efficiencies in that it reduced expected number of species extinctions up to 17 times more effectively than ad hoc approaches. The outcome illustrates the importance of governance in coordinating management action when multiple projects have similar objectives and rely on systematic methods rather than expanding networks opportunistically.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12922-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Minimización de las Extinciones de Especies por medio de la Planeación Estratégica del Enrejado de Conservación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12922-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los cercos de conservación son una acción de de manejo cada vez más común, particularmente para las especies amenazadas por los depredadores invasores. Sin embargo, a diferencia de muchas acciones de conservación, las redes de cercos se están expandiendo de manera unisistémica, generalmente como reacción a las oportunidades de financiamiento local o a las amenazas. Realizamos un análisis de vacío de la red de cercos de exclusión de depredadores en Australia al examinar la traslocación de los mamíferos australianos en relación con su riesgo de extinción. Para abordar los vacíos identificados en la representación de las especies diseñamos un método de priorización sistemática para expandir la red de cercos de conservación que incorporaban explícitamente el análisis de viabilidad poblacional y minimizaban las extinciones esperadas de las especies. La estrategia se aplicó en Nueva Gales del Sur, Australia, en donde el gobierno del estado pretende expandir la red existente de cercos de conservación. La protección existente de las especies en las áreas cercadas fue muy desigual; el 67 % de las especies sensibles a los depredadores estuvo mal representado en la red de cercos. Nuestra priorización sistemática produjo eficiencias sustanciales ya que redujo el número esperado de extinciones de especies hasta 17 veces más efectivas que las estrategias ad hoc. El resultado ilustra la importancia de la gobernanza en la coordinación de la acción de manejo cuando múltiples proyectos tienen objetivos similares y dependen de los métodos sistemáticos en lugar de expandir las redes de manera oportunista.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Conservation fences are an increasingly common management action, particularly for species threatened by invasive predators. However, unlike many conservation actions, fence networks are expanding in an unsystematic manner, generally as a reaction to local funding opportunities or threats. We conducted a gap analysis of Australia's large predator-exclusion fence network by examining translocation of Australian mammals relative to their extinction risk. To address gaps identified in species representation, we devised a systematic prioritization method for expanding the conservation fence network that explicitly incorporated population viability analysis and minimized expected species’ extinctions. The approach was applied to New South Wales, Australia, where the state government intends to expand the existing conservation fence network. Existing protection of species in fenced areas was highly uneven; 67% of predator-sensitive species were unrepresented in the fence network. Our systematic prioritization yielded substantial efficiencies in that it reduced expected number of species extinctions up to 17 times more effectively than ad hoc approaches. The outcome illustrates the importance of governance in coordinating management action when multiple projects have similar objectives and rely on systematic methods rather than expanding networks opportunistically.


Minimización de las Extinciones de Especies por medio de la Planeación Estratégica del Enrejado de Conservación

Resumen
Los cercos de conservación son una acción de de manejo cada vez más común, particularmente para las especies amenazadas por los depredadores invasores. Sin embargo, a diferencia de muchas acciones de conservación, las redes de cercos se están expandiendo de manera unisistémica, generalmente como reacción a las oportunidades de financiamiento local o a las amenazas. Realizamos un análisis de vacío de la red de cercos de exclusión de depredadores en Australia al examinar la traslocación de los mamíferos australianos en relación con su riesgo de extinción. Para abordar los vacíos identificados en la representación de las especies diseñamos un método de priorización sistemática para expandir la red de cercos de conservación que incorporaban explícitamente el análisis de viabilidad poblacional y minimizaban las extinciones esperadas de las especies. La estrategia se aplicó en Nueva Gales del Sur, Australia, en donde el gobierno del estado pretende expandir la red existente de cercos de conservación. La protección existente de las especies en las áreas cercadas fue muy desigual; el 67 % de las especies sensibles a los depredadores estuvo mal representado en la red de cercos. Nuestra priorización sistemática produjo eficiencias sustanciales ya que redujo el número esperado de extinciones de especies hasta 17 veces más efectivas que las estrategias ad hoc. El resultado ilustra la importancia de la gobernanza en la coordinación de la acción de manejo cuando múltiples proyectos tienen objetivos similares y dependen de los métodos sistemáticos en lugar de expandir las redes de manera oportunista.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12951" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Testing for thresholds of ecosystem collapse in seagrass meadows</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12951</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Testing for thresholds of ecosystem collapse in seagrass meadows</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean D. Connell, Milena Fernandes, Owen W. Burnell, Zoë A. Doubleday, Kingsley J. Griffin, Andrew D. Irving, Jonathan Y.S. Leung, Samuel Owen, Bayden D. Russell, Laura J. Falkenberg</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-28T11:00:55.841568-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12951</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12951</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12951</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Note</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although the public desire for healthy environments is clear-cut, the science and management of ecosystem health has not been as simple. Ecological systems can be dynamic and can shift abruptly from one ecosystem state to another. Such unpredictable shifts result when ecological thresholds are crossed; that is, small cumulative increases in an environmental stressor drive a much greater change than could be predicted from linear effects, suggesting an unforeseen tipping point is crossed. In coastal waters, broad-scale seagrass loss often occurs as a sudden event associated with human-driven nutrient enrichment (eutrophication). We tested whether the response of seagrass ecosystems to coastal nutrient enrichment is subject to a threshold effect. We exposed seagrass plots to different levels of nutrient enrichment (dissolved inorganic nitrogen) for 10 months and measured net production. Seagrass response exhibited a threshold pattern when nutrient enrichment exceeded moderate levels: there was an abrupt and large shift from positive to negative net leaf production (from approximately 0.04 leaf production to 0.02 leaf loss per day). Epiphyte load also increased as nutrient enrichment increased, which may have driven the shift in leaf production. Inadvertently crossing such thresholds, as can occur through ineffective management of land-derived inputs such as wastewater and stormwater runoff along urbanized coasts, may account for the widely observed sudden loss of seagrass meadows. Identification of tipping points may improve not only adaptive-management monitoring that seeks to avoid threshold effects, but also restoration approaches in systems that have crossed them.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12951-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>La Búsqueda de Umbrales del Colapso Ambiental en las Praderas de Pastos Marinos</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12951-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Aunque el deseo público por un ambiente saludable es más que claro, la ciencia y el manejo de la salud de los ecosistemas no han sido sencillos. Los sistemas ecológicos pueden ser dinámicos y pueden cambiar súbitamente de un estado ambiental a otro. Dichos cambios impredecibles suceden cuando se cruzan los umbrales ecológicos; esto es, pequeños incrementos acumulativos de un estresante ambiental conllevan a un cambio mucho mayor del que podría pronosticarse a partir de efectos lineales, sugiriendo que se ha cruzado un momento crítico imprevisto. En las aguas costeras, la pérdida de pastos marinos a gran escala ocurre comúnmente como un evento repentino asociado con el enriquecimiento de nutrientes causado por humanos (eutrofización). Probamos si la respuesta de los ecosistemas de pastos marinos al enriquecimiento costero de nutrientes está sujeta al efecto umbral. Expusimos lotes de pastos marinos a diferentes niveles de enriquecimiento de nutrientes (nitrógeno inorgánico disuelto) durante diez meses y medimos la producción neta. La respuesta de los pastos marinos exhibió un patrón de umbral cuando el enriquecimiento de nutrientes excedió niveles moderados: hubo un cambio mayor y súbito de positivo a negativo de producción neta de hojas (de aproximadamente 0.04 de producción de hojas a 0.02 de pérdida de hojas por día). La carga de epífitas también incrementó conforme incrementó el enriquecimiento de nutrientes, lo que pudo haber conducido el cambio en la producción de hojas. Cruzar dichos umbrales de manera inadvertida, como puede ocurrir por medio del manejo inefectivo de contribuciones derivadas del suelo como las aguas negras y la escorrentía de lluvia a lo largo de las costas urbanizadas, puede representar la pérdida de praderas de pastos marinos observada ampliamente. La identificación de los momentos críticos puede mejorar no sólo el monitoreo del manejo adaptativo que busca evitar los efectos umbral, sino también las estrategias de restauración en sistemas que ya han cruzado estos umbrales.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Although the public desire for healthy environments is clear-cut, the science and management of ecosystem health has not been as simple. Ecological systems can be dynamic and can shift abruptly from one ecosystem state to another. Such unpredictable shifts result when ecological thresholds are crossed; that is, small cumulative increases in an environmental stressor drive a much greater change than could be predicted from linear effects, suggesting an unforeseen tipping point is crossed. In coastal waters, broad-scale seagrass loss often occurs as a sudden event associated with human-driven nutrient enrichment (eutrophication). We tested whether the response of seagrass ecosystems to coastal nutrient enrichment is subject to a threshold effect. We exposed seagrass plots to different levels of nutrient enrichment (dissolved inorganic nitrogen) for 10 months and measured net production. Seagrass response exhibited a threshold pattern when nutrient enrichment exceeded moderate levels: there was an abrupt and large shift from positive to negative net leaf production (from approximately 0.04 leaf production to 0.02 leaf loss per day). Epiphyte load also increased as nutrient enrichment increased, which may have driven the shift in leaf production. Inadvertently crossing such thresholds, as can occur through ineffective management of land-derived inputs such as wastewater and stormwater runoff along urbanized coasts, may account for the widely observed sudden loss of seagrass meadows. Identification of tipping points may improve not only adaptive-management monitoring that seeks to avoid threshold effects, but also restoration approaches in systems that have crossed them.


La Búsqueda de Umbrales del Colapso Ambiental en las Praderas de Pastos Marinos

Resumen
Aunque el deseo público por un ambiente saludable es más que claro, la ciencia y el manejo de la salud de los ecosistemas no han sido sencillos. Los sistemas ecológicos pueden ser dinámicos y pueden cambiar súbitamente de un estado ambiental a otro. Dichos cambios impredecibles suceden cuando se cruzan los umbrales ecológicos; esto es, pequeños incrementos acumulativos de un estresante ambiental conllevan a un cambio mucho mayor del que podría pronosticarse a partir de efectos lineales, sugiriendo que se ha cruzado un momento crítico imprevisto. En las aguas costeras, la pérdida de pastos marinos a gran escala ocurre comúnmente como un evento repentino asociado con el enriquecimiento de nutrientes causado por humanos (eutrofización). Probamos si la respuesta de los ecosistemas de pastos marinos al enriquecimiento costero de nutrientes está sujeta al efecto umbral. Expusimos lotes de pastos marinos a diferentes niveles de enriquecimiento de nutrientes (nitrógeno inorgánico disuelto) durante diez meses y medimos la producción neta. La respuesta de los pastos marinos exhibió un patrón de umbral cuando el enriquecimiento de nutrientes excedió niveles moderados: hubo un cambio mayor y súbito de positivo a negativo de producción neta de hojas (de aproximadamente 0.04 de producción de hojas a 0.02 de pérdida de hojas por día). La carga de epífitas también incrementó conforme incrementó el enriquecimiento de nutrientes, lo que pudo haber conducido el cambio en la producción de hojas. Cruzar dichos umbrales de manera inadvertida, como puede ocurrir por medio del manejo inefectivo de contribuciones derivadas del suelo como las aguas negras y la escorrentía de lluvia a lo largo de las costas urbanizadas, puede representar la pérdida de praderas de pastos marinos observada ampliamente. La identificación de los momentos críticos puede mejorar no sólo el monitoreo del manejo adaptativo que busca evitar los efectos umbral, sino también las estrategias de restauración en sistemas que ya han cruzado estos umbrales.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12958" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12958</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carlos Carroll, Brett Hartl, Gretchen T. Goldman, Daniel J. Rohlf, Adrian Treves, Jeremy T. Kerr, Euan G. Ritchie, Richard T. Kingsford, Katherine E. Gibbs, Martine Maron, James E. M. Watson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-25T04:06:35.367213-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12958</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12958</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12958</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Practice and Policy</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Government agencies faced with politically controversial decisions often discount or ignore scientific information, whether from agency staff or nongovernmental scientists. Recent developments in scientific integrity (the ability to perform, use, communicate, and publish science free from censorship or political interference) in Canada, Australia, and the United States demonstrate a similar trajectory. A perceived increase in scientific-integrity abuses provokes concerted pressure by the scientific community, leading to efforts to improve scientific-integrity protections under a new administration. However, protections are often inconsistently applied and are at risk of reversal under administrations publicly hostile to evidence-based policy. We compared recent challenges to scientific integrity to determine what aspects of scientific input into conservation policy are most at risk of political distortion and what can be done to strengthen safeguards against such abuses. To ensure the integrity of outbound communications from government scientists to the public, we suggest governments strengthen scientific integrity policies, include scientists’ right to speak freely in collective-bargaining agreements, guarantee public access to scientific information, and strengthen agency culture supporting scientific integrity. To ensure the transparency and integrity with which information from nongovernmental scientists (e.g., submitted comments or formal policy reviews) informs the policy process, we suggest governments broaden the scope of independent reviews, ensure greater diversity of expert input and transparency regarding conflicts of interest, require a substantive response to input from agencies, and engage proactively with scientific societies. For their part, scientists and scientific societies have a responsibility to engage with the public to affirm that science is a crucial resource for developing evidence-based policy and regulations in the public interest.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12958-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>En Defensa de la Integridad Científica de los Procesos de Política de Conservación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12958-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las agencias del gobierno que enfrentan decisiones políticas controversiales comúnmente rebajan o ignoran la información científica, ya sea de empleados de la agencia o científicos no-gubernamentales. Los desarrollos recientes en la integridad científica (la capacidad de desempeñar, usar, comunicar, y publicar ciencia libre de censura o interferencia política) en Canadá, Australia y en los Estados Unidos demuestran una trayectoria similar. Un incremento percibido en los abusos a la integridad científica provoca presiones conjuntas por la comunidad científica, lo que lleva a esfuerzos por mejorar las protecciones de la integridad científica bajo una nueva administración. Sin embargo, las protecciones se aplican continuamente sin consistencia y están en riesgo de una regresión bajo administraciones públicamente hostiles a la política basada en evidencias. Comparamos los retos recientes para la integridad científica para determinar cuáles aspectos de la contribución científica a la política de conservación están en mayor riesgo de una distorsión política y qué puede hacerse para fortalecer los salvoconductos contra dichos abusos. Para asegurar la integridad de las comunicaciones salientes de los científicos del gobierno al público sugerimos que los gobiernos fortalezcan las políticas de integridad científica, incluyan el derecho a hablar libremente de los científicos en los acuerdos de negociaciones colectivas, garanticen el acceso del público a la información científica, y que fortalezcan la cultura de la agencia apoyando a la integridad científica. Para asegurar la transparencia y la integridad con la cual la información de los científicos no-gubernamentales (por ejemplo, los comentarios entregados o las revisiones de política formal) informa los procesos políticos sugerimos que los gobiernos amplíen el enfoque de las revisiones independientes, aseguren una mayor diversidad de contribuciones de expertos y transparencia con respecto a los conflictos de interés, requieran una respuesta sustanciosa a la contribución de las agencias, y que participen de manera proactiva con las sociedades científicas. Por su parte, los científicos y las sociedades científicas tienen la responsabilidad de comprometerse con el público para afirmar que la ciencia es un recurso crucial para desarrollar las políticas basadas en evidencias y las regulaciones en el interés público.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Government agencies faced with politically controversial decisions often discount or ignore scientific information, whether from agency staff or nongovernmental scientists. Recent developments in scientific integrity (the ability to perform, use, communicate, and publish science free from censorship or political interference) in Canada, Australia, and the United States demonstrate a similar trajectory. A perceived increase in scientific-integrity abuses provokes concerted pressure by the scientific community, leading to efforts to improve scientific-integrity protections under a new administration. However, protections are often inconsistently applied and are at risk of reversal under administrations publicly hostile to evidence-based policy. We compared recent challenges to scientific integrity to determine what aspects of scientific input into conservation policy are most at risk of political distortion and what can be done to strengthen safeguards against such abuses. To ensure the integrity of outbound communications from government scientists to the public, we suggest governments strengthen scientific integrity policies, include scientists’ right to speak freely in collective-bargaining agreements, guarantee public access to scientific information, and strengthen agency culture supporting scientific integrity. To ensure the transparency and integrity with which information from nongovernmental scientists (e.g., submitted comments or formal policy reviews) informs the policy process, we suggest governments broaden the scope of independent reviews, ensure greater diversity of expert input and transparency regarding conflicts of interest, require a substantive response to input from agencies, and engage proactively with scientific societies. For their part, scientists and scientific societies have a responsibility to engage with the public to affirm that science is a crucial resource for developing evidence-based policy and regulations in the public interest.


En Defensa de la Integridad Científica de los Procesos de Política de Conservación

Resumen
Las agencias del gobierno que enfrentan decisiones políticas controversiales comúnmente rebajan o ignoran la información científica, ya sea de empleados de la agencia o científicos no-gubernamentales. Los desarrollos recientes en la integridad científica (la capacidad de desempeñar, usar, comunicar, y publicar ciencia libre de censura o interferencia política) en Canadá, Australia y en los Estados Unidos demuestran una trayectoria similar. Un incremento percibido en los abusos a la integridad científica provoca presiones conjuntas por la comunidad científica, lo que lleva a esfuerzos por mejorar las protecciones de la integridad científica bajo una nueva administración. Sin embargo, las protecciones se aplican continuamente sin consistencia y están en riesgo de una regresión bajo administraciones públicamente hostiles a la política basada en evidencias. Comparamos los retos recientes para la integridad científica para determinar cuáles aspectos de la contribución científica a la política de conservación están en mayor riesgo de una distorsión política y qué puede hacerse para fortalecer los salvoconductos contra dichos abusos. Para asegurar la integridad de las comunicaciones salientes de los científicos del gobierno al público sugerimos que los gobiernos fortalezcan las políticas de integridad científica, incluyan el derecho a hablar libremente de los científicos en los acuerdos de negociaciones colectivas, garanticen el acceso del público a la información científica, y que fortalezcan la cultura de la agencia apoyando a la integridad científica. Para asegurar la transparencia y la integridad con la cual la información de los científicos no-gubernamentales (por ejemplo, los comentarios entregados o las revisiones de política formal) informa los procesos políticos sugerimos que los gobiernos amplíen el enfoque de las revisiones independientes, aseguren una mayor diversidad de contribuciones de expertos y transparencia con respecto a los conflictos de interés, requieran una respuesta sustanciosa a la contribución de las agencias, y que participen de manera proactiva con las sociedades científicas. Por su parte, los científicos y las sociedades científicas tienen la responsabilidad de comprometerse con el público para afirmar que la ciencia es un recurso crucial para desarrollar las políticas basadas en evidencias y las regulaciones en el interés público.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12981" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Getting to know the family in order to save them</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12981</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Getting to know the family in order to save them</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thibaud Gruber</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-21T11:35:37.876801-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12981</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12981</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12981</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12973" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A Biased Introduction to the “New Environmental History”</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12973</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Biased Introduction to the “New Environmental History”</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zsolt Pinke</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-17T11:55:20.781957-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12973</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12973</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12973</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12925" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Threats to intact tropical peatlands and opportunities for their conservation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12925</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Threats to intact tropical peatlands and opportunities for their conservation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">K.H. Roucoux, I.T. Lawson, T.R. Baker, D. Del Castillo Torres, F.C. Draper, O. Lähteenoja, M.P. Gilmore, E.N. Honorio Coronado, T.J. Kelly, E.T.A. Mitchard, C.F. Vriesendorp</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-10T12:10:42.549746-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12925</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12925</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12925</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Large, intact areas of tropical peatland are highly threatened at a global scale by the expansion of commercial agriculture and other forms of economic development. Conserving peatlands on a landscape scale, with their hydrology intact, is of international conservation importance to preserve their distinctive biodiversity and ecosystem services and maintain their resilience to future environmental change. We explored threats to and opportunities for conserving remaining intact tropical peatlands; thus, we excluded peatlands of Indonesia and Malaysia, where extensive deforestation, drainage, and conversion to plantations means conservation in this region can protect only small fragments of the original ecosystem. We focused on a case study, the Pastaza-Marañón Foreland Basin (PMFB) in Peru, which is among the largest known intact tropical peatland landscapes in the world and is representative of peatland vulnerability. Maintenance of the hydrological conditions critical for carbon storage and ecosystem function of peatlands is, in the PMFB, primarily threatened by expansion of commercial agriculture linked to new transport infrastructure that is facilitating access to remote areas. There remain opportunities in the PMFB and elsewhere to develop alternative, more sustainable land-use practices. Although some of the peatlands in the PMFB fall within existing legally protected areas, this protection does not include the most carbon-dense (domed pole forest) areas. New carbon-based conservation instruments (e.g., REDD+, Green Climate Fund), developing markets for sustainable peatland products, transferring land title to local communities, and expanding protected areas offer pathways to increased protection for intact tropical peatlands in Amazonia and elsewhere, such as those in New Guinea and Central Africa which remain, for the moment, broadly beyond the frontier of commercial development.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12925-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Amenazas a las Turberas Tropicales Intactas y las Oportunidades para su Conservación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12925-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Extensas e intactas áreas de turberas tropicales están severamente amenazadas a escala mundial, debido a la expansión de la agricultura comercial y a otras formas de desarrollo económico. La conservación de las turberas como parte del medio natural, con su hidrología no intervenida, es de importancia internacional para asegurar la conservación de su biodiversidad tan característica y de los servicios ambientales que ofrecen, y así mantener su resiliencia ante futuros cambios ambientales. Exploramos las amenazas y las oportunidades para conservar las turberas tropicales intactas y remanentes. Nuestro enfoque por lo tanto excluye las turberas de Indonesia y Malasia, donde la deforestación de forma extensiva y el drenado para el establecimiento de plantaciones hace que la conservación en estas regiones pueda proteger solo pequeños fragmentos del ecosistema original. En este estudio, nos enfocamos en las cuencas del Pastaza-Marañón (PMFB, siglas en inglés) en Perú, que comprende una de las turberas tropicales intactas más extensas del mundo y es representativa de la vulnerabilidad que las amenaza. El mantenimiento de las condiciones hidrológicas críticas para el almacenamiento de carbono y la función ambiental de las turberas está, en la PMFB, amenazada principalmente por la expansión de la agricultura comercial y las nuevas vías de transporte que facilitan el acceso a las áreas remotas. En la PMFB y en otros lugares aún hay oportunidades para desarrollar prácticas alternativas y sostenibles del uso del suelo. Aunque algunas de las turberas en la PMFB caen dentro de áreas naturales protegidas, esta protección no incluye las áreas con mayor densidad de carbono (varillal hidromórfico). Nuevas herramientas para la conservación basada en el carbono (p.e. REDD+, Fondo Verde para el Clima), el desarrollo de mercados para los productos de las turberas, la transferencia de títulos de propiedad de la tierra a las comunidades locales, y la expansión de las áreas protegidas ofrecen alternativas para una mayor protección de las turberas tropicales intactas en la Amazonía y en otros lugares, como las turberas de Nueva Guinea y África Central que permanecen, por el momento, alejadas de la frontera de desarrollo comercial.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Large, intact areas of tropical peatland are highly threatened at a global scale by the expansion of commercial agriculture and other forms of economic development. Conserving peatlands on a landscape scale, with their hydrology intact, is of international conservation importance to preserve their distinctive biodiversity and ecosystem services and maintain their resilience to future environmental change. We explored threats to and opportunities for conserving remaining intact tropical peatlands; thus, we excluded peatlands of Indonesia and Malaysia, where extensive deforestation, drainage, and conversion to plantations means conservation in this region can protect only small fragments of the original ecosystem. We focused on a case study, the Pastaza-Marañón Foreland Basin (PMFB) in Peru, which is among the largest known intact tropical peatland landscapes in the world and is representative of peatland vulnerability. Maintenance of the hydrological conditions critical for carbon storage and ecosystem function of peatlands is, in the PMFB, primarily threatened by expansion of commercial agriculture linked to new transport infrastructure that is facilitating access to remote areas. There remain opportunities in the PMFB and elsewhere to develop alternative, more sustainable land-use practices. Although some of the peatlands in the PMFB fall within existing legally protected areas, this protection does not include the most carbon-dense (domed pole forest) areas. New carbon-based conservation instruments (e.g., REDD+, Green Climate Fund), developing markets for sustainable peatland products, transferring land title to local communities, and expanding protected areas offer pathways to increased protection for intact tropical peatlands in Amazonia and elsewhere, such as those in New Guinea and Central Africa which remain, for the moment, broadly beyond the frontier of commercial development.


Amenazas a las Turberas Tropicales Intactas y las Oportunidades para su Conservación

Resumen
Extensas e intactas áreas de turberas tropicales están severamente amenazadas a escala mundial, debido a la expansión de la agricultura comercial y a otras formas de desarrollo económico. La conservación de las turberas como parte del medio natural, con su hidrología no intervenida, es de importancia internacional para asegurar la conservación de su biodiversidad tan característica y de los servicios ambientales que ofrecen, y así mantener su resiliencia ante futuros cambios ambientales. Exploramos las amenazas y las oportunidades para conservar las turberas tropicales intactas y remanentes. Nuestro enfoque por lo tanto excluye las turberas de Indonesia y Malasia, donde la deforestación de forma extensiva y el drenado para el establecimiento de plantaciones hace que la conservación en estas regiones pueda proteger solo pequeños fragmentos del ecosistema original. En este estudio, nos enfocamos en las cuencas del Pastaza-Marañón (PMFB, siglas en inglés) en Perú, que comprende una de las turberas tropicales intactas más extensas del mundo y es representativa de la vulnerabilidad que las amenaza. El mantenimiento de las condiciones hidrológicas críticas para el almacenamiento de carbono y la función ambiental de las turberas está, en la PMFB, amenazada principalmente por la expansión de la agricultura comercial y las nuevas vías de transporte que facilitan el acceso a las áreas remotas. En la PMFB y en otros lugares aún hay oportunidades para desarrollar prácticas alternativas y sostenibles del uso del suelo. Aunque algunas de las turberas en la PMFB caen dentro de áreas naturales protegidas, esta protección no incluye las áreas con mayor densidad de carbono (varillal hidromórfico). Nuevas herramientas para la conservación basada en el carbono (p.e. REDD+, Fondo Verde para el Clima), el desarrollo de mercados para los productos de las turberas, la transferencia de títulos de propiedad de la tierra a las comunidades locales, y la expansión de las áreas protegidas ofrecen alternativas para una mayor protección de las turberas tropicales intactas en la Amazonía y en otros lugares, como las turberas de Nueva Guinea y África Central que permanecen, por el momento, alejadas de la frontera de desarrollo comercial.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12938" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Connecting today's climates to future climate analogs to facilitate movement of species under climate change</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12938</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Connecting today's climates to future climate analogs to facilitate movement of species under climate change</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Caitlin E. Littlefield, Brad H. McRae, Julia L. Michalak, Joshua J. Lawler, Carlos Carroll</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-10T12:06:20.131139-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12938</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12938</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12938</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Increasing connectivity is an important strategy for facilitating species range shifts and maintaining biodiversity in the face of climate change. To date, however, few researchers have included future climate projections in efforts to prioritize areas for increasing connectivity. We identified key areas likely to facilitate climate-induced species’ movement across western North America. Using historical climate data sets and future climate projections, we mapped potential species’ movement routes that link current climate conditions to analogous climate conditions in the future (i.e., future climate analogs) with a novel moving-window analysis based on electrical circuit theory. In addition to tracing shifting climates, the approach accounted for landscape permeability and empirically derived species’ dispersal capabilities. We compared connectivity maps generated with our climate-change-informed approach with maps of connectivity based solely on the degree of human modification of the landscape. Including future climate projections in connectivity models substantially shifted and constrained priority areas for movement to a smaller proportion of the landscape than when climate projections were not considered. Potential movement, measured as current flow, decreased in all ecoregions when climate projections were included, particularly when dispersal was limited, which made climate analogs inaccessible. Many areas emerged as important for connectivity only when climate change was modeled in 2 time steps rather than in a single time step. Our results illustrate that movement routes needed to track changing climatic conditions may differ from those that connect present-day landscapes. Incorporating future climate projections into connectivity modeling is an important step toward facilitating successful species movement and population persistence in a changing climate.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12938-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>La Conexión entre los Climas de Hoy y los Futuros Climas Análogos para Facilitar el Movimiento de las Especies bajo el Cambio Climático</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12938-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Incrementar la conectividad es una estrategia importante para facilitarle a las especies cambios en su extensión y mantener a la biodiversidad de frente al cambio climático. Sin embargo, a la fecha pocos investigadores han incluido las proyecciones del futuro climático en los esfuerzos por priorizar áreas para incrementar la conectividad. Identificamos áreas clave con probabilidad de facilitar el movimiento de las especies inducido por el clima en América del Norte. Por medio de un análisis novedoso de ventana en movimiento basado en la teoría de los circuitos eléctricos, mapeamos las rutas potenciales de movimiento de las especies que enlazan las condiciones climáticas actuales con condiciones climáticas análogas en el futuro (es decir, futuros climas análogos) utilizando conjuntos de datos históricos del clima y las proyecciones del futuro climático. Además de rastrear los climas cambiantes, la estrategia tomó en cuenta la permeabilidad del paisaje y derivó empíricamente las capacidades de dispersión de las especies. Comparamos los mapas de conectividad generados con nuestra estrategia informada por el cambio climático con los mapas de conectividad basados solamente en el grado de modificación humana del paisaje. La inclusión de las proyecciones del futuro climático dentro de los modelos de conectividad modificó y restringió sustancialmente las áreas prioritarias de movimiento a una porción más pequeña del paisaje que cuando no se consideraron las proyecciones climáticas. El movimiento potencial, medido como el flujo de corriente, disminuyó en todas las ecoregiones cuando se incluyeron las proyecciones climáticas, particularmente cuando la dispersión estuvo limitada, lo que hizo que los análogos climáticos fueran inaccesibles. Muchas áreas emergieron como importantes para la conectividad sólo cuando el cambio climático fue modelado en pasos de dos tiempos, en lugar de un paso de un sólo tiempo. Nuestros resultados ilustran que las rutas de movimiento necesarias para rastrear las condiciones climáticas cambiantes pueden diferir de aquellas que conectan a los paisajes hoy en día. La incorporación de las proyecciones del futuro climático dentro del modelado de conectividad es un paso importante hacia la facilitación del movimiento exitoso para las especies y la persistencia de las poblaciones en un clima cambiante.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Increasing connectivity is an important strategy for facilitating species range shifts and maintaining biodiversity in the face of climate change. To date, however, few researchers have included future climate projections in efforts to prioritize areas for increasing connectivity. We identified key areas likely to facilitate climate-induced species’ movement across western North America. Using historical climate data sets and future climate projections, we mapped potential species’ movement routes that link current climate conditions to analogous climate conditions in the future (i.e., future climate analogs) with a novel moving-window analysis based on electrical circuit theory. In addition to tracing shifting climates, the approach accounted for landscape permeability and empirically derived species’ dispersal capabilities. We compared connectivity maps generated with our climate-change-informed approach with maps of connectivity based solely on the degree of human modification of the landscape. Including future climate projections in connectivity models substantially shifted and constrained priority areas for movement to a smaller proportion of the landscape than when climate projections were not considered. Potential movement, measured as current flow, decreased in all ecoregions when climate projections were included, particularly when dispersal was limited, which made climate analogs inaccessible. Many areas emerged as important for connectivity only when climate change was modeled in 2 time steps rather than in a single time step. Our results illustrate that movement routes needed to track changing climatic conditions may differ from those that connect present-day landscapes. Incorporating future climate projections into connectivity modeling is an important step toward facilitating successful species movement and population persistence in a changing climate.


La Conexión entre los Climas de Hoy y los Futuros Climas Análogos para Facilitar el Movimiento de las Especies bajo el Cambio Climático

Resumen
Incrementar la conectividad es una estrategia importante para facilitarle a las especies cambios en su extensión y mantener a la biodiversidad de frente al cambio climático. Sin embargo, a la fecha pocos investigadores han incluido las proyecciones del futuro climático en los esfuerzos por priorizar áreas para incrementar la conectividad. Identificamos áreas clave con probabilidad de facilitar el movimiento de las especies inducido por el clima en América del Norte. Por medio de un análisis novedoso de ventana en movimiento basado en la teoría de los circuitos eléctricos, mapeamos las rutas potenciales de movimiento de las especies que enlazan las condiciones climáticas actuales con condiciones climáticas análogas en el futuro (es decir, futuros climas análogos) utilizando conjuntos de datos históricos del clima y las proyecciones del futuro climático. Además de rastrear los climas cambiantes, la estrategia tomó en cuenta la permeabilidad del paisaje y derivó empíricamente las capacidades de dispersión de las especies. Comparamos los mapas de conectividad generados con nuestra estrategia informada por el cambio climático con los mapas de conectividad basados solamente en el grado de modificación humana del paisaje. La inclusión de las proyecciones del futuro climático dentro de los modelos de conectividad modificó y restringió sustancialmente las áreas prioritarias de movimiento a una porción más pequeña del paisaje que cuando no se consideraron las proyecciones climáticas. El movimiento potencial, medido como el flujo de corriente, disminuyó en todas las ecoregiones cuando se incluyeron las proyecciones climáticas, particularmente cuando la dispersión estuvo limitada, lo que hizo que los análogos climáticos fueran inaccesibles. Muchas áreas emergieron como importantes para la conectividad sólo cuando el cambio climático fue modelado en pasos de dos tiempos, en lugar de un paso de un sólo tiempo. Nuestros resultados ilustran que las rutas de movimiento necesarias para rastrear las condiciones climáticas cambiantes pueden diferir de aquellas que conectan a los paisajes hoy en día. La incorporación de las proyecciones del futuro climático dentro del modelado de conectividad es un paso importante hacia la facilitación del movimiento exitoso para las especies y la persistencia de las poblaciones en un clima cambiante.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12839" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Questioning public perception, conservation policy, and recovery actions for honeybees in North America</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12839</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Questioning public perception, conservation policy, and recovery actions for honeybees in North America</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sheila R. Colla, J. Scott MacIvor</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-10T12:05:32.619183-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12839</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12839</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12839</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Diversity</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12927" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12927</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jodi S. Brandt, Teri Allendorf, Volker Radeloff, Jeremy Brooks</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-05T07:46:14.025901-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12927</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12927</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12927</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Globally, deforestation continues, and although protected areas effectively protect forests, the majority of forests are not in protected areas. Thus, how effective are different management regimes to avoid deforestation in non-protected forests? We sought to assess the effectiveness of different national forest-management regimes to safeguard forests outside protected areas. We compared 2000–2014 deforestation rates across the temperate forests of 5 countries in the Himalaya (Bhutan, Nepal, China, India, and Myanmar) of which 13% are protected. We reviewed the literature to characterize forest management regimes in each country and conducted a quasi-experimental analysis to measure differences in deforestation of unprotected forests among countries and states in India. Countries varied in both overarching forest-management goals and specific tenure arrangements and policies for unprotected forests, from policies emphasizing economic development to those focused on forest conservation. Deforestation rates differed up to 1.4% between countries, even after accounting for local determinants of deforestation, such as human population density, market access, and topography. The highest deforestation rates were associated with forest policies aimed at maximizing profits and unstable tenure regimes. Deforestation in national forest-management regimes that emphasized conservation and community management were relatively low. In India results were consistent with the national-level results. We interpreted our results in the context of the broader literature on decentralized, community-based natural resource management, and our findings emphasize that the type and quality of community-based forestry programs and the degree to which they are oriented toward sustainable use rather than economic development are important for forest protection. Our cross-national results are consistent with results from site- and regional-scale studies that show forest-management regimes that ensure stable land tenure and integrate local-livelihood benefits with forest conservation result in the best forest outcomes.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12927-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Efectos de los Regímenes de Manejo de los Bosques Nacionales sobre los Bosques Desprotegidos del Himalaya</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12927-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La deforestación continúa a nivel mundial y aunque las áreas protegidas protegen eficientemente a los bosques, la mayoría de éstos no están en áreas protegidas. Por lo tanto, ¿qué tan efectivos son los diferentes regímenes de manejo para evitar la deforestación en los bosques sin protección? Comparamos las tasas de deforestación de 2000 a 2014 en los bosques templados de cinco países del Himalaya (Bután, Nepal, China, India y Myanmar), de los cuales el 13% está protegido. Revisamos la literatura para caracterizar los regímenes de manejo forestal en cada país y realizamos un análisis casi experimental para medir las diferencias en la deforestación de los bosques desprotegidos entre los países y los estados de la India. Los países variaron desde los objetivos dominantes del manejo forestal y los arreglos específicos por antigüedad y las políticas para los bosques desprotegidos, desde políticas que enfatizan el desarrollo económico hasta aquellas enfocadas en la conservación forestal. Las tasas de deforestación difirieron hasta un 1.4% entre los países, incluso después de representar los determinantes locales de la deforestación, como la densidad poblacional humana, el acceso al mercado y la topografía. Las tasas más altas de deforestación estuvieron asociadas con políticas forestales dirigidas a la maximización de las ganancias y regímenes inestables de antigüedad. La deforestación dentro de los regímenes de manejo forestal que enfatizaron la conservación y el manejo comunitario fue relativamente baja. En la India, los resultados fueron consistentes con los resultados a nivel nacional. Interpretamos nuestros resultados dentro del contexto de la literatura generalizada sobre el manejo de recursos descentralizado y basado en la comunidad. Nuestros hallazgos enfatizan que ese tipo y calidad de programas forestales basados en la comunidad y el grado en el que están orientados hacia el uso sustentable en lugar del desarrollo económico es importante para la protección forestal. Nuestros resultados trans-nacionales son consistentes con los resultados de estudios a escala regional y de sitio que muestran que los regímenes de manejo forestal que aseguran una antigüedad estable de suelo e integran los beneficios del sustento local con la conservación forestal resultan en mejores resultados forestales.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Globally, deforestation continues, and although protected areas effectively protect forests, the majority of forests are not in protected areas. Thus, how effective are different management regimes to avoid deforestation in non-protected forests? We sought to assess the effectiveness of different national forest-management regimes to safeguard forests outside protected areas. We compared 2000–2014 deforestation rates across the temperate forests of 5 countries in the Himalaya (Bhutan, Nepal, China, India, and Myanmar) of which 13% are protected. We reviewed the literature to characterize forest management regimes in each country and conducted a quasi-experimental analysis to measure differences in deforestation of unprotected forests among countries and states in India. Countries varied in both overarching forest-management goals and specific tenure arrangements and policies for unprotected forests, from policies emphasizing economic development to those focused on forest conservation. Deforestation rates differed up to 1.4% between countries, even after accounting for local determinants of deforestation, such as human population density, market access, and topography. The highest deforestation rates were associated with forest policies aimed at maximizing profits and unstable tenure regimes. Deforestation in national forest-management regimes that emphasized conservation and community management were relatively low. In India results were consistent with the national-level results. We interpreted our results in the context of the broader literature on decentralized, community-based natural resource management, and our findings emphasize that the type and quality of community-based forestry programs and the degree to which they are oriented toward sustainable use rather than economic development are important for forest protection. Our cross-national results are consistent with results from site- and regional-scale studies that show forest-management regimes that ensure stable land tenure and integrate local-livelihood benefits with forest conservation result in the best forest outcomes.


Efectos de los Regímenes de Manejo de los Bosques Nacionales sobre los Bosques Desprotegidos del Himalaya

Resumen
La deforestación continúa a nivel mundial y aunque las áreas protegidas protegen eficientemente a los bosques, la mayoría de éstos no están en áreas protegidas. Por lo tanto, ¿qué tan efectivos son los diferentes regímenes de manejo para evitar la deforestación en los bosques sin protección? Comparamos las tasas de deforestación de 2000 a 2014 en los bosques templados de cinco países del Himalaya (Bután, Nepal, China, India y Myanmar), de los cuales el 13% está protegido. Revisamos la literatura para caracterizar los regímenes de manejo forestal en cada país y realizamos un análisis casi experimental para medir las diferencias en la deforestación de los bosques desprotegidos entre los países y los estados de la India. Los países variaron desde los objetivos dominantes del manejo forestal y los arreglos específicos por antigüedad y las políticas para los bosques desprotegidos, desde políticas que enfatizan el desarrollo económico hasta aquellas enfocadas en la conservación forestal. Las tasas de deforestación difirieron hasta un 1.4% entre los países, incluso después de representar los determinantes locales de la deforestación, como la densidad poblacional humana, el acceso al mercado y la topografía. Las tasas más altas de deforestación estuvieron asociadas con políticas forestales dirigidas a la maximización de las ganancias y regímenes inestables de antigüedad. La deforestación dentro de los regímenes de manejo forestal que enfatizaron la conservación y el manejo comunitario fue relativamente baja. En la India, los resultados fueron consistentes con los resultados a nivel nacional. Interpretamos nuestros resultados dentro del contexto de la literatura generalizada sobre el manejo de recursos descentralizado y basado en la comunidad. Nuestros hallazgos enfatizan que ese tipo y calidad de programas forestales basados en la comunidad y el grado en el que están orientados hacia el uso sustentable en lugar del desarrollo económico es importante para la protección forestal. Nuestros resultados trans-nacionales son consistentes con los resultados de estudios a escala regional y de sitio que muestran que los regímenes de manejo forestal que aseguran una antigüedad estable de suelo e integran los beneficios del sustento local con la conservación forestal resultan en mejores resultados forestales.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12961" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>What Works in an Uncertain and Complex World</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12961</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">What Works in an Uncertain and Complex World</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pierre L. Ibisch</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-05T07:45:44.406029-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12961</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12961</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12961</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12959" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12959</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lily M. Eeden, Mathew S. Crowther, Chris R. Dickman, David W. Macdonald, William J. Ripple, Euan G. Ritchie, Thomas M. Newsome</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-05T07:40:49.197064-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12959</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12959</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12959</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Large carnivores are persecuted globally because they threaten human industries and livelihoods. How this conflict is managed has consequences for the conservation of large carnivores and biodiversity more broadly. Mitigating human–predator conflict should be evidence-based and accommodate people's values while protecting carnivores. Despite much research into human and large-carnivore coexistence strategies, there have been few attempts to document the success of conflict-mitigation strategies on a global scale. We conducted a meta-analysis of global research on conflict mitigation related to large carnivores and humans. We focused on conflicts that arise from the threat large carnivores pose to livestock. We first used structured and unstructured searching to identify replicated studies that used before–after or control–impact design to measure change in livestock loss as a result of implementing a management intervention. We then extracted relevant data from these studies to calculate an overall effect size for each intervention type. Research effort and focus varied among continents and aligned with the histories and cultures that shaped livestock production and attitudes toward carnivores. Livestock guardian animals most effectively reduced livestock losses. Lethal control was the second most effective control, although its success varied the most, and guardian animals and lethal control did not differ significantly. Financial incentives have promoted tolerance of large carnivores in some settings and reduced retaliatory killings. We suggest coexistence strategies be location-specific, incorporate cultural values and environmental conditions, and be designed such that return on financial investment can be evaluated. Improved monitoring of mitigation measures is urgently required to promote effective evidence-based policy.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12959-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Manejo del Conflicto entre Carnívoros Grandes y el Ganado</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12959-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los carnívoros grandes son perseguidos en todo el mundo porque amenazan el sustento y las industrias humanas. En general, la forma en que se maneja este conflicto tiene consecuencias para la conservación de los grandes carnívoros y la biodiversidad. La mitigación del conflicto humano – fauna debería tener bases en las evidencias y debería acomodarse a los valores de las personas mientras protege a los carnívoros. A pesar de la amplia investigación sobre las estrategias de coexistencia entre humanos y carnívoros grandes, ha habido pocos intentos por documentar el éxito de las estrategias mitigantes del conflicto en una escala global. Realizamos un meta-análisis de la investigación global sobre la mitigación de conflictos relacionados con los carnívoros grandes y los humanos. Nos enfocamos en los conflictos que surgen de la amenaza que los carnívoros grandes presentan para el ganado. Primero utilizamos búsquedas estructuradas y no-estructuradas para identificar los estudios replicados que utilizaron el diseño antes – después o control – impacto para medir el cambio en la pérdida del ganado como resultado de la implementación de una intervención de manejo. Después extrajimos los datos relevantes de estos estudios para calcular un tamaño general de efecto para cada tipo de intervención. El esfuerzo y el enfoque de la investigación variaron entre los continentes y se alinearon con las historias y culturas que dieron forma a la producción ganadera y a las actitudes hacia los carnívoros. Los animales guardianes del ganado fueron los que redujeron con mayor eficiencia las pérdidas del ganado. El control letal fue el segundo control más efectivo, aunque su éxito fue el que más varió, y los animales guardianes y el control letal no difirieron significativamente. Los incentivos económicos han promovido la tolerancia de los carnívoros grandes en algunas localidades y han reducido las muertes por represalia. Sugerimos que las estrategias de coexistencia sean específicas de la localidad, incorporen los valores culturales y las condiciones ambientales, y estén diseñadas de tal forma que el retorno de una inversión financiera pueda ser evaluado. El monitoreo mejorado de las medidas de mitigación es requerido urgentemente para promover la política efectiva basada en evidencias.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Large carnivores are persecuted globally because they threaten human industries and livelihoods. How this conflict is managed has consequences for the conservation of large carnivores and biodiversity more broadly. Mitigating human–predator conflict should be evidence-based and accommodate people's values while protecting carnivores. Despite much research into human and large-carnivore coexistence strategies, there have been few attempts to document the success of conflict-mitigation strategies on a global scale. We conducted a meta-analysis of global research on conflict mitigation related to large carnivores and humans. We focused on conflicts that arise from the threat large carnivores pose to livestock. We first used structured and unstructured searching to identify replicated studies that used before–after or control–impact design to measure change in livestock loss as a result of implementing a management intervention. We then extracted relevant data from these studies to calculate an overall effect size for each intervention type. Research effort and focus varied among continents and aligned with the histories and cultures that shaped livestock production and attitudes toward carnivores. Livestock guardian animals most effectively reduced livestock losses. Lethal control was the second most effective control, although its success varied the most, and guardian animals and lethal control did not differ significantly. Financial incentives have promoted tolerance of large carnivores in some settings and reduced retaliatory killings. We suggest coexistence strategies be location-specific, incorporate cultural values and environmental conditions, and be designed such that return on financial investment can be evaluated. Improved monitoring of mitigation measures is urgently required to promote effective evidence-based policy.


El Manejo del Conflicto entre Carnívoros Grandes y el Ganado

Resumen
Los carnívoros grandes son perseguidos en todo el mundo porque amenazan el sustento y las industrias humanas. En general, la forma en que se maneja este conflicto tiene consecuencias para la conservación de los grandes carnívoros y la biodiversidad. La mitigación del conflicto humano – fauna debería tener bases en las evidencias y debería acomodarse a los valores de las personas mientras protege a los carnívoros. A pesar de la amplia investigación sobre las estrategias de coexistencia entre humanos y carnívoros grandes, ha habido pocos intentos por documentar el éxito de las estrategias mitigantes del conflicto en una escala global. Realizamos un meta-análisis de la investigación global sobre la mitigación de conflictos relacionados con los carnívoros grandes y los humanos. Nos enfocamos en los conflictos que surgen de la amenaza que los carnívoros grandes presentan para el ganado. Primero utilizamos búsquedas estructuradas y no-estructuradas para identificar los estudios replicados que utilizaron el diseño antes – después o control – impacto para medir el cambio en la pérdida del ganado como resultado de la implementación de una intervención de manejo. Después extrajimos los datos relevantes de estos estudios para calcular un tamaño general de efecto para cada tipo de intervención. El esfuerzo y el enfoque de la investigación variaron entre los continentes y se alinearon con las historias y culturas que dieron forma a la producción ganadera y a las actitudes hacia los carnívoros. Los animales guardianes del ganado fueron los que redujeron con mayor eficiencia las pérdidas del ganado. El control letal fue el segundo control más efectivo, aunque su éxito fue el que más varió, y los animales guardianes y el control letal no difirieron significativamente. Los incentivos económicos han promovido la tolerancia de los carnívoros grandes en algunas localidades y han reducido las muertes por represalia. Sugerimos que las estrategias de coexistencia sean específicas de la localidad, incorporen los valores culturales y las condiciones ambientales, y estén diseñadas de tal forma que el retorno de una inversión financiera pueda ser evaluado. El monitoreo mejorado de las medidas de mitigación es requerido urgentemente para promover la política efectiva basada en evidencias.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12926" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Estimating freshwater turtle mortality rates and population declines following hook ingestion</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12926</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Estimating freshwater turtle mortality rates and population declines following hook ingestion</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David A. Steen, Orin J. Robinson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-05T07:40:28.807485-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12926</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12926</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12926</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Freshwater turtle populations are susceptible to declines following small increases in the mortality of adults, making it essential to identify and understand potential threats. Freshwater turtles ingest fish hooks associated with recreational angling, and this is likely a problem because hook ingestion is a source of additive mortality for sea turtles. We used a Bayesian-modeling framework, observed rates of hook ingestion by freshwater turtles, and mortality of sea turtles from hook ingestion to examine the probability that a freshwater turtle in a given population ingests a hook and subsequently dies from it. We used the results of these analyses and previously published life-history data to simulate the effects of hook ingestion on population growth for 3 species of freshwater turtle. In our simulation, the probability that an individual turtle ingests a hook and dies as a result was 1.2–11%. Our simulation results suggest that this rate of mortality from hook ingestion is sufficient to cause population declines. We believe we have identified fish-hook ingestion as a serious yet generally overlooked threat to the viability of freshwater turtle populations.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12926-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Estimación de las Tasas de Mortalidad y Declinaciones Poblacionales de Tortugas de Agua Dulce después de la Ingesta de Anzuelos</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12926-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las poblaciones de tortugas de agua dulce son susceptibles a las declinaciones como consecuencia de pequeños incrementos en la mortalidad de los adultos, lo que hace que sea esencial la identificación y el entendimiento de las amenazas potenciales. Las tortugas de agua dulce ingieren anzuelos de pesca asociados con la pesca recreativa y esto es probablemente un problema pues la ingesta de anzuelos es una fuente de mortalidad añadida para las tortugas marinas. Utilizamos un marco de trabajo de modelo Bayesiano, observamos las tasas de ingesta de anzuelos por parte de las tortugas de agua dulce y la mortalidad de las tortugas marinas a partir de la ingesta de anzuelos para examinar la probabilidad de que una tortuga de agua dulce en una población dada ingiera un anzuelo y muera por esto. Utilizamos los resultados de estos análisis y datos de historia de vida publicados previamente para simular los efectos de la ingesta de anzuelos sobre el crecimiento poblacional de tres especies de tortuga de agua dulce. En nuestra simulación, la probabilidad de que una tortuga individual ingiera un anzuelo y muera como resultado fue de 1.2 – 11 %. Los resultados de nuestra simulación sugieren que esta tasa de mortalidad por ingesta de anzuelos es suficiente para ocasionar declinaciones en la población. Creemos que hemos identificado la ingesta de anzuelos como una amenaza seria, aunque ignorada generalmente, para la viabilidad poblacional de las tortugas de agua dulce.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Freshwater turtle populations are susceptible to declines following small increases in the mortality of adults, making it essential to identify and understand potential threats. Freshwater turtles ingest fish hooks associated with recreational angling, and this is likely a problem because hook ingestion is a source of additive mortality for sea turtles. We used a Bayesian-modeling framework, observed rates of hook ingestion by freshwater turtles, and mortality of sea turtles from hook ingestion to examine the probability that a freshwater turtle in a given population ingests a hook and subsequently dies from it. We used the results of these analyses and previously published life-history data to simulate the effects of hook ingestion on population growth for 3 species of freshwater turtle. In our simulation, the probability that an individual turtle ingests a hook and dies as a result was 1.2–11%. Our simulation results suggest that this rate of mortality from hook ingestion is sufficient to cause population declines. We believe we have identified fish-hook ingestion as a serious yet generally overlooked threat to the viability of freshwater turtle populations.


Estimación de las Tasas de Mortalidad y Declinaciones Poblacionales de Tortugas de Agua Dulce después de la Ingesta de Anzuelos

Resumen
Las poblaciones de tortugas de agua dulce son susceptibles a las declinaciones como consecuencia de pequeños incrementos en la mortalidad de los adultos, lo que hace que sea esencial la identificación y el entendimiento de las amenazas potenciales. Las tortugas de agua dulce ingieren anzuelos de pesca asociados con la pesca recreativa y esto es probablemente un problema pues la ingesta de anzuelos es una fuente de mortalidad añadida para las tortugas marinas. Utilizamos un marco de trabajo de modelo Bayesiano, observamos las tasas de ingesta de anzuelos por parte de las tortugas de agua dulce y la mortalidad de las tortugas marinas a partir de la ingesta de anzuelos para examinar la probabilidad de que una tortuga de agua dulce en una población dada ingiera un anzuelo y muera por esto. Utilizamos los resultados de estos análisis y datos de historia de vida publicados previamente para simular los efectos de la ingesta de anzuelos sobre el crecimiento poblacional de tres especies de tortuga de agua dulce. En nuestra simulación, la probabilidad de que una tortuga individual ingiera un anzuelo y muera como resultado fue de 1.2 – 11 %. Los resultados de nuestra simulación sugieren que esta tasa de mortalidad por ingesta de anzuelos es suficiente para ocasionar declinaciones en la población. Creemos que hemos identificado la ingesta de anzuelos como una amenaza seria, aunque ignorada generalmente, para la viabilidad poblacional de las tortugas de agua dulce.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12908" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Characterizing fish responses to a river restoration over 21 years based on species’ traits</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12908</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Characterizing fish responses to a river restoration over 21 years based on species’ traits</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefanie Höckendorff, Jonathan D. Tonkin, Peter Haase, Margret Bunzel-Drüke, Olaf Zimball, Matthias Scharf, Stefan Stoll</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-04T12:05:36.819434-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12908</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12908</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12908</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Understanding restoration effectiveness is often impaired by a lack of high-quality, long-term monitoring data and, to date, few researchers have used species’ trait information to gain insight into the processes that drive the reaction of fish communities to restoration. We examined fish-community responses with a highly resolved data set from 21 consecutive years of electrofishing (4 years prerestoration and 17 years postrestoration) at multiple restored and unrestored reaches from a river restoration project on the Lippe River, Germany. Fish abundance peaked in the third year after the restoration; abundance was 6 times higher than before the restoration. After 5–7 years, species richness and abundance stabilized at 2 and 3.5 times higher levels relative to the prerestoration level, respectively. However, interannual variability of species richness and abundance remained considerable, illustrating the challenge of reliably assessing restoration outcomes based on data from individual samplings, especially in the first years following restoration. Life-history and reproduction-related traits best explained differences in species’ responses to restoration. Opportunistic short-lived species with early female maturity and multiple spawning runs per year exhibited the strongest increase in abundance, which reflected their ability to rapidly colonize new habitats. These often small-bodied and fusiform fishes typically live in dynamic and ephemeral instream and floodplain areas that river-habitat restorations often aim to create, and in this case their increases in abundance indicated successful restoration. Our results suggest that a greater consideration of species’ traits may enhance the causal understanding of community processes and the coupling of restoration to functional ecology. Trait-based assessments of restoration outcomes would furthermore allow for easier transfer of knowledge across biogeographic borders than studies based on taxonomy.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12908-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Caracterización de las Respuestas de los Peces a la Restauración de un Río a lo Largo de 21 Años con base en los Atributos de las Especies</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12908-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El entendimiento de la efectividad de la restauración está frecuentemente debilitado por la falta de datos de alta calidad de monitoreos de larga duración y, a la fecha, pocos investigadores han utilizado la información sobre las características de las especies para obtener conocimiento sobre los procesos que conducen la reacción de las comunidades de peces a la restauración. Examinamos las respuestas de las comunidades de peces con un conjunto de datos de alta resolución a partir de 21 años consecutivos de electropesca (4 años pre- y 17 años pos-restauración) en ramificaciones múltiples con y sin restauración de un proyecto de restauración en el río Lippe, Alemania. La abundancia de los peces alcanzó su máximo en el tercer año después de la restauración; la abundancia fue seis veces más alta que antes de la restauración. Después de 5–7 años, la riqueza y la abundancia de especies se estabilizó en niveles 2 y 3.5 veces más altos en relación a los niveles previos a la restauración, respectivamente. Sin embargo, la variabilidad interanual de la riqueza y abundancia de especies permaneció considerable, ilustrando el reto de valorar con confianza los resultados de restauración con base en los datos de muestreos individuales, especialmente en los primeros años después de la restauración. La historia de vida y las características relacionadas con la reproducción explicaron de mejor manera las diferencias en las respuestas de las especies a la restauración. Las especies oportunistas de vida corta con madurez temprana en las hembras y múltiples periodos de desove por año exhibieron el mayor incremento en la abundancia, lo que reflejó su habilidad para colonizar nuevos hábitats rápidamente. Estos peces fusiformes y generalmente de cuerpo pequeño viven comúnmente en áreas dinámicas y efímeras dentro de la corriente y de planicie inundable, objetivo frecuente de las acciones de restauración de hábitats de río, y en este caso su incremento en la abundancia indicó una restauración exitosa. Nuestros resultados sugieren que una mayor consideración de las características de las especies puede mejorar el entendimiento casual de los procesos comunitarios y el acoplamiento de la restauración con la ecología funcional. La utilización de las características para valorar los resultados de la restauración podría permitir una transferencia más sencilla de conocimiento a través de las fronteras biogeográficas que los estudios basados en la taxonomía.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Understanding restoration effectiveness is often impaired by a lack of high-quality, long-term monitoring data and, to date, few researchers have used species’ trait information to gain insight into the processes that drive the reaction of fish communities to restoration. We examined fish-community responses with a highly resolved data set from 21 consecutive years of electrofishing (4 years prerestoration and 17 years postrestoration) at multiple restored and unrestored reaches from a river restoration project on the Lippe River, Germany. Fish abundance peaked in the third year after the restoration; abundance was 6 times higher than before the restoration. After 5–7 years, species richness and abundance stabilized at 2 and 3.5 times higher levels relative to the prerestoration level, respectively. However, interannual variability of species richness and abundance remained considerable, illustrating the challenge of reliably assessing restoration outcomes based on data from individual samplings, especially in the first years following restoration. Life-history and reproduction-related traits best explained differences in species’ responses to restoration. Opportunistic short-lived species with early female maturity and multiple spawning runs per year exhibited the strongest increase in abundance, which reflected their ability to rapidly colonize new habitats. These often small-bodied and fusiform fishes typically live in dynamic and ephemeral instream and floodplain areas that river-habitat restorations often aim to create, and in this case their increases in abundance indicated successful restoration. Our results suggest that a greater consideration of species’ traits may enhance the causal understanding of community processes and the coupling of restoration to functional ecology. Trait-based assessments of restoration outcomes would furthermore allow for easier transfer of knowledge across biogeographic borders than studies based on taxonomy.


Caracterización de las Respuestas de los Peces a la Restauración de un Río a lo Largo de 21 Años con base en los Atributos de las Especies

Resumen
El entendimiento de la efectividad de la restauración está frecuentemente debilitado por la falta de datos de alta calidad de monitoreos de larga duración y, a la fecha, pocos investigadores han utilizado la información sobre las características de las especies para obtener conocimiento sobre los procesos que conducen la reacción de las comunidades de peces a la restauración. Examinamos las respuestas de las comunidades de peces con un conjunto de datos de alta resolución a partir de 21 años consecutivos de electropesca (4 años pre- y 17 años pos-restauración) en ramificaciones múltiples con y sin restauración de un proyecto de restauración en el río Lippe, Alemania. La abundancia de los peces alcanzó su máximo en el tercer año después de la restauración; la abundancia fue seis veces más alta que antes de la restauración. Después de 5–7 años, la riqueza y la abundancia de especies se estabilizó en niveles 2 y 3.5 veces más altos en relación a los niveles previos a la restauración, respectivamente. Sin embargo, la variabilidad interanual de la riqueza y abundancia de especies permaneció considerable, ilustrando el reto de valorar con confianza los resultados de restauración con base en los datos de muestreos individuales, especialmente en los primeros años después de la restauración. La historia de vida y las características relacionadas con la reproducción explicaron de mejor manera las diferencias en las respuestas de las especies a la restauración. Las especies oportunistas de vida corta con madurez temprana en las hembras y múltiples periodos de desove por año exhibieron el mayor incremento en la abundancia, lo que reflejó su habilidad para colonizar nuevos hábitats rápidamente. Estos peces fusiformes y generalmente de cuerpo pequeño viven comúnmente en áreas dinámicas y efímeras dentro de la corriente y de planicie inundable, objetivo frecuente de las acciones de restauración de hábitats de río, y en este caso su incremento en la abundancia indicó una restauración exitosa. Nuestros resultados sugieren que una mayor consideración de las características de las especies puede mejorar el entendimiento casual de los procesos comunitarios y el acoplamiento de la restauración con la ecología funcional. La utilización de las características para valorar los resultados de la restauración podría permitir una transferencia más sencilla de conocimiento a través de las fronteras biogeográficas que los estudios basados en la taxonomía.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12962" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Mutualisms and How to Analyze Them</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12962</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mutualisms and How to Analyze Them</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Nash</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-04T12:05:26.010216-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12962</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12962</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12962</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12918" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12918</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wolke Tobón, Tania Urquiza-Haas, Patricia Koleff, Matthias Schröter, Rubén Ortega-Álvarez, Julio Campo, Roberto Lindig-Cisneros, José Sarukhán, Aletta Bonn</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-30T07:30:56.187143-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12918</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12918</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12918</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Ecological restoration has become an important strategy to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems services. To restore 15% of degraded ecosystems as stipulated by the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi target 15, we developed a prioritization framework to identify potential priority sites for restoration in Mexico, a megadiverse country. We used the most current biological and environmental data on Mexico to assess areas of biological importance and restoration feasibility at national scale and engaged stakeholders and experts throughout the process. We integrated 8 criteria into 2 components (i.e., biological importance and restoration feasibility) in a spatial multicriteria analysis and generated 11 scenarios to test the effect of assigning different component weights. The priority restoration sites were distributed across all terrestrial ecosystems of Mexico; 64.1% were in degraded natural vegetation and 6% were in protected areas. Our results provide a spatial guide to where restoration could enhance the persistence of species of conservation concern and vulnerable ecosystems while maximizing the likelihood of restoration success. Such spatial prioritization is a first step in informing policy makers and restoration planners where to focus local and large-scale restoration efforts, which should additionally incorporate social and monetary cost–benefit considerations.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12918-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Planificación para la restauración como guía para el cumplimiento de las Metas de Aichi en un país megadiverso</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12918-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La restauración ecológica se ha convertido en una estrategia importante para conservar la biodiversidad y los servicios ambientales. Para restaurar el 15% de los ecosistemas degradados, como se estipuló en la Meta 15 de las Metas de Aichi de la Convención sobre la Diversidad Biológica, desarrollamos un marco conceptual para identificar los potenciales sitios prioritarios a restaurar en México, un país megadiverso. Utilizamos los datos biológicos y ambientales más actuales sobre México para valorar las áreas de importancia biológica y la viabilidad de la restauración a una escala nacional, involucrando a actores y expertos a lo largo del proceso. Integramos ocho criterios dentro de dos componentes (es decir, importancia biológica y viabilidad de la restauración) en un modelo espacial multicriterio y generamos once escenarios para probar el efecto de adjudicar diferentes valores a los componentes. Los sitios prioritarios de restauración se distribuyeron en todos los ecosistemas terrestres de México; 64.1% en vegetación natural degradada y 6% dentro de áreas protegidas. Nuestros resultados proporcionan una guía espacial que indica donde la restauración podría mejorar la persistencia de las especies de importancia para la conservación y de los ecosistemas vulnerables, a la vez que maximiza la probabilidad del éxito de restauración. Tal priorización espacial es un primer paso para informar a quienes hacen las políticas y a los planificadores de la restauración sobre en dónde enfocar los esfuerzos de restauración locales y a gran escala, lo cual también debería incorporar consideraciones sociales y de costo-beneficio monetario.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Ecological restoration has become an important strategy to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems services. To restore 15% of degraded ecosystems as stipulated by the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi target 15, we developed a prioritization framework to identify potential priority sites for restoration in Mexico, a megadiverse country. We used the most current biological and environmental data on Mexico to assess areas of biological importance and restoration feasibility at national scale and engaged stakeholders and experts throughout the process. We integrated 8 criteria into 2 components (i.e., biological importance and restoration feasibility) in a spatial multicriteria analysis and generated 11 scenarios to test the effect of assigning different component weights. The priority restoration sites were distributed across all terrestrial ecosystems of Mexico; 64.1% were in degraded natural vegetation and 6% were in protected areas. Our results provide a spatial guide to where restoration could enhance the persistence of species of conservation concern and vulnerable ecosystems while maximizing the likelihood of restoration success. Such spatial prioritization is a first step in informing policy makers and restoration planners where to focus local and large-scale restoration efforts, which should additionally incorporate social and monetary cost–benefit considerations.


Planificación para la restauración como guía para el cumplimiento de las Metas de Aichi en un país megadiverso

Resumen
La restauración ecológica se ha convertido en una estrategia importante para conservar la biodiversidad y los servicios ambientales. Para restaurar el 15% de los ecosistemas degradados, como se estipuló en la Meta 15 de las Metas de Aichi de la Convención sobre la Diversidad Biológica, desarrollamos un marco conceptual para identificar los potenciales sitios prioritarios a restaurar en México, un país megadiverso. Utilizamos los datos biológicos y ambientales más actuales sobre México para valorar las áreas de importancia biológica y la viabilidad de la restauración a una escala nacional, involucrando a actores y expertos a lo largo del proceso. Integramos ocho criterios dentro de dos componentes (es decir, importancia biológica y viabilidad de la restauración) en un modelo espacial multicriterio y generamos once escenarios para probar el efecto de adjudicar diferentes valores a los componentes. Los sitios prioritarios de restauración se distribuyeron en todos los ecosistemas terrestres de México; 64.1% en vegetación natural degradada y 6% dentro de áreas protegidas. Nuestros resultados proporcionan una guía espacial que indica donde la restauración podría mejorar la persistencia de las especies de importancia para la conservación y de los ecosistemas vulnerables, a la vez que maximiza la probabilidad del éxito de restauración. Tal priorización espacial es un primer paso para informar a quienes hacen las políticas y a los planificadores de la restauración sobre en dónde enfocar los esfuerzos de restauración locales y a gran escala, lo cual también debería incorporar consideraciones sociales y de costo-beneficio monetario.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12890" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The difficulties of systematic reviews</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12890</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The difficulties of systematic reviews</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin J. Westgate, David B. Lindenmayer</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-20T06:25:28.535493-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12890</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12890</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12890</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The need for robust evidence to support conservation actions has driven the adoption of systematic approaches to research synthesis in ecology. However, applying systematic review to complex or open questions remains challenging, and this task is becoming more difficult as the quantity of scientific literature increases. We drew on the science of linguistics for guidance as to why the process of identifying and sorting information during systematic review remains so labor intensive, and to provide potential solutions. Several linguistic properties of peer-reviewed corpora—including nonrandom selection of review topics, small-world properties of semantic networks, and spatiotemporal variation in word meaning—greatly increase the effort needed to complete the systematic review process. Conversely, the resolution of these semantic complexities is a common motivation for narrative reviews, but this process is rarely enacted with the rigor applied during linguistic analysis. Therefore, linguistics provides a unifying framework for understanding some key challenges of systematic review and highlights 2 useful directions for future research. First, in cases where semantic complexity generates barriers to synthesis, ecologists should consider drawing on existing methods—such as natural language processing or the construction of research thesauri and ontologies—that provide tools for mapping and resolving that complexity. These tools could help individual researchers classify research material in a more robust manner and provide valuable guidance for future researchers on that topic. Second, a linguistic perspective highlights that scientific writing is a rich resource worthy of detailed study, an observation that can sometimes be lost during the search for data during systematic review or meta-analysis. For example, mapping semantic networks can reveal redundancy and complementarity among scientific concepts, leading to new insights and research questions. Consequently, wider adoption of linguistic approaches may facilitate improved rigor and richness in research synthesis.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12890-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Dificultades de las Revisiones Sistemáticas</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12890-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La necesidad de evidencias sólidas que apoyen las acciones de conservación ha llevado a la adopción de enfoques sistemáticos para la síntesis de las investigaciones ecológicas. Sin embargo, la aplicación de las revisiones sistemáticas a preguntas complejas o abiertas todavía es un reto y esta tarea se complica cada vez más conforme la literatura científica incrementa. Partimos de la ciencia de la lingüística como guía para responder por qué el proceso de identificación y clasificación de información durante las revisiones sistemáticas todavía es una labor tan intensiva y poder proporcionar soluciones potenciales. Varias propiedades lingüísticas de la recopilación de revisiones por pares – incluyendo la selección no-aleatoria de temas de revisión, las propiedades del mundo pequeño de las redes semánticas, y la variación espaciotemporal en el significado de las palabras – incrementa enormemente el esfuerzo necesario para completar el proceso de revisión sistemática. Por otro lado, la solución a estas complejidades semánticas es una motivación común para las revisiones narrativas, pero este proceso rara vez se realiza con el rigor aplicado durante el análisis lingüístico. Por lo tanto, la lingüística proporciona un marco de trabajo unificado para el entendimiento de algunos retos importantes para las revisiones sistemáticas y resalta dos direcciones útiles para investigaciones futuras. Primero, en los casos en los que la complejidad semántica genera barreras para la síntesis, los ecólogos deberían considerar partir de métodos existentes – como el procesamiento natural del lenguaje o la construcción de tesauros de investigación y ontologías – que proporcionen las herramientas para el mapeo y solución de esa complejidad. Estas herramientas podrían ayudar a los investigadores individuales a clasificar el material de trabajo de manera más sólida y proporcionar una guía valiosa sobre ese tema para los futuros investigadores. Segundo, una perspectiva lingüística resalta que la escritura científica es un recurso abundante digno de un estudio detallado, una observación que a veces puede perderse durante la búsqueda de datos durante revisiones sistemáticas o meta-análisis. Por ejemplo. El mapeo de las redes semánticas puede develar la redundancia y complementariedad entre los conceptos científicos, derivando en nuevos conocimientos y preguntas de investigación. Como consecuencia, la adopción de enfoques lingüísticos más amplios puede facilitar el rigor y la riqueza de la síntesis de las investigaciones.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The need for robust evidence to support conservation actions has driven the adoption of systematic approaches to research synthesis in ecology. However, applying systematic review to complex or open questions remains challenging, and this task is becoming more difficult as the quantity of scientific literature increases. We drew on the science of linguistics for guidance as to why the process of identifying and sorting information during systematic review remains so labor intensive, and to provide potential solutions. Several linguistic properties of peer-reviewed corpora—including nonrandom selection of review topics, small-world properties of semantic networks, and spatiotemporal variation in word meaning—greatly increase the effort needed to complete the systematic review process. Conversely, the resolution of these semantic complexities is a common motivation for narrative reviews, but this process is rarely enacted with the rigor applied during linguistic analysis. Therefore, linguistics provides a unifying framework for understanding some key challenges of systematic review and highlights 2 useful directions for future research. First, in cases where semantic complexity generates barriers to synthesis, ecologists should consider drawing on existing methods—such as natural language processing or the construction of research thesauri and ontologies—that provide tools for mapping and resolving that complexity. These tools could help individual researchers classify research material in a more robust manner and provide valuable guidance for future researchers on that topic. Second, a linguistic perspective highlights that scientific writing is a rich resource worthy of detailed study, an observation that can sometimes be lost during the search for data during systematic review or meta-analysis. For example, mapping semantic networks can reveal redundancy and complementarity among scientific concepts, leading to new insights and research questions. Consequently, wider adoption of linguistic approaches may facilitate improved rigor and richness in research synthesis.


Dificultades de las Revisiones Sistemáticas

Resumen
La necesidad de evidencias sólidas que apoyen las acciones de conservación ha llevado a la adopción de enfoques sistemáticos para la síntesis de las investigaciones ecológicas. Sin embargo, la aplicación de las revisiones sistemáticas a preguntas complejas o abiertas todavía es un reto y esta tarea se complica cada vez más conforme la literatura científica incrementa. Partimos de la ciencia de la lingüística como guía para responder por qué el proceso de identificación y clasificación de información durante las revisiones sistemáticas todavía es una labor tan intensiva y poder proporcionar soluciones potenciales. Varias propiedades lingüísticas de la recopilación de revisiones por pares – incluyendo la selección no-aleatoria de temas de revisión, las propiedades del mundo pequeño de las redes semánticas, y la variación espaciotemporal en el significado de las palabras – incrementa enormemente el esfuerzo necesario para completar el proceso de revisión sistemática. Por otro lado, la solución a estas complejidades semánticas es una motivación común para las revisiones narrativas, pero este proceso rara vez se realiza con el rigor aplicado durante el análisis lingüístico. Por lo tanto, la lingüística proporciona un marco de trabajo unificado para el entendimiento de algunos retos importantes para las revisiones sistemáticas y resalta dos direcciones útiles para investigaciones futuras. Primero, en los casos en los que la complejidad semántica genera barreras para la síntesis, los ecólogos deberían considerar partir de métodos existentes – como el procesamiento natural del lenguaje o la construcción de tesauros de investigación y ontologías – que proporcionen las herramientas para el mapeo y solución de esa complejidad. Estas herramientas podrían ayudar a los investigadores individuales a clasificar el material de trabajo de manera más sólida y proporcionar una guía valiosa sobre ese tema para los futuros investigadores. Segundo, una perspectiva lingüística resalta que la escritura científica es un recurso abundante digno de un estudio detallado, una observación que a veces puede perderse durante la búsqueda de datos durante revisiones sistemáticas o meta-análisis. Por ejemplo. El mapeo de las redes semánticas puede develar la redundancia y complementariedad entre los conceptos científicos, derivando en nuevos conocimientos y preguntas de investigación. Como consecuencia, la adopción de enfoques lingüísticos más amplios puede facilitar el rigor y la riqueza de la síntesis de las investigaciones.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12907" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Functional nonredundancy of elephants in a disturbed tropical forest</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12907</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Functional nonredundancy of elephants in a disturbed tropical forest</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nitin Sekar, Chia-Lo Lee, Raman Sukumar</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-16T06:30:27.309964-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12907</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12907</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12907</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Conservation efforts are often motivated by the threat of global extinction. Yet if conservationists had more information suggesting that extirpation of individual species could lead to undesirable ecological effects, they might more frequently attempt to protect or restore such species across their ranges even if they were not globally endangered. Scientists have seldom measured or quantitatively predicted the functional consequences of species loss, even for large, extinction-prone species that theory suggests should be functionally unique. We measured the contribution of Asian elephants (<i>Elephas maximus</i>) to the dispersal of 3 large-fruited species in a disturbed tropical moist forest and predicted the extent to which alternative dispersers could compensate for elephants in their absence. We created an empirical probability model with data on frugivory and seed dispersal from Buxa Tiger Reserve, India. These data were used to estimate the proportion of seeds consumed by elephants and other frugivores that survive handling and density-dependent processes (Janzen-Connell effects and conspecific intradung competition) and germinate. Without compensation, the number of seeds dispersed and surviving density-dependent effects decreased 26% (<i>Artocarpus chaplasha</i>), 42% (<i>Careya arborea</i>), and 72% (<i>Dillenia indica</i>) when elephants were <em>absent from the ecosystem</em>. Compensatory fruit removal by other animals substantially ameliorated these losses. For instance, reductions in successful dispersal of <i>D. indica</i> were as low as 23% when gaur (<i>Bos gaurus</i>) persisted, but median dispersal distance still declined from 30% (<i>C. arborea</i>) to 90% (<i>A. chaplasha</i>) without elephants. Our results support the theory that the largest <em>animal</em> species in an ecosystem have nonredundant ecological functionality and that their extirpation is likely to lead to the deterioration of ecosystem processes such as seed dispersal. This effect is likely accentuated by the overall defaunation of many tropical systems.</p></div>
<div class="section" id="cobi12907-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>La No-Redundancia Funcional de Elefantes en un Bosque Tropical Perturbado</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12907-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los esfuerzos de conservación están motivados frecuentemente por la amenaza de la extinción global. Si los conservacionistas tuvieran más información que sugiriera que la extirpación de una especie individual podría resultar en efectos ecológicos no deseados, podrían intentar con mayor frecuencia proteger o restaurar dichas especies a lo largo de sus extensiones aunque no estuvieran en peligro a nivel mundial. Los científicos rara vez han medido o pronosticado cuantitativamente las consecuencias funcionales de la pérdida de especies, incluso para especies grandes con disposición a la extinción que la teoría sugiere deberían ser únicas funcionalmente. Medimos la contribución de los elefantes asiáticos (<i>Elephas maximus</i>) a la dispersión de tres especies de frutos grandes en un bosque tropical húmedo perturbado y pronosticamos la extensión a la que los dispersores alternativos podrían compensar por los elefantes en su ausencia. Creamos un modelo empírico de probabilidad con datos de frugivoría y dispersión de semillas en la Reserva de Tigres Buxa, India. Estos datos se utilizaron para estimar la proporción de semillas consumidas por elefantes y otros frugívoros que sobreviven al manejo y los procesos dependientes de la densidad (efectos Janzen-Connell y la competencia co-específica en las excretas) y después germinan. Sin la compensación, el número de semillas dispersadas y sobrevivientes a los efectos dependientes de la densidad disminuyó 26 % (<i>Artocarpus chaplasha</i>), 42% (<i>Careya arborea</i>), y 72% (<i>Dillenia indica</i>) cuando los elefantes fueron extirpados. La remoción compensatoria de frutos por parte de otros animales mejoró sustancialmente estás pérdidas. Por ejemplo, las reducciones en la dispersión exitosa de <i>D. indica</i> fueron tan bajas como el 23 % cuando el gaúr (<i>Bos gaurus</i>) persistió, pero la distancia promedio de dispersión todavía declinó de un 30 % (<i>C. arborea</i>) a un 90 % (<i>A. chaplasha</i>) sin los elefantes. Nuestros resultados respaldan la teoría de que las grandes especies tienen una funcionalidad no-redundante en un ecosistema y que su extirpación es probable que derive en el deterioro de los procesos del ecosistema, como la dispersión de semillas. Este efecto probablemente está acentuado por la defaunación general de muchos sistemas tropicales.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Conservation efforts are often motivated by the threat of global extinction. Yet if conservationists had more information suggesting that extirpation of individual species could lead to undesirable ecological effects, they might more frequently attempt to protect or restore such species across their ranges even if they were not globally endangered. Scientists have seldom measured or quantitatively predicted the functional consequences of species loss, even for large, extinction-prone species that theory suggests should be functionally unique. We measured the contribution of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) to the dispersal of 3 large-fruited species in a disturbed tropical moist forest and predicted the extent to which alternative dispersers could compensate for elephants in their absence. We created an empirical probability model with data on frugivory and seed dispersal from Buxa Tiger Reserve, India. These data were used to estimate the proportion of seeds consumed by elephants and other frugivores that survive handling and density-dependent processes (Janzen-Connell effects and conspecific intradung competition) and germinate. Without compensation, the number of seeds dispersed and surviving density-dependent effects decreased 26% (Artocarpus chaplasha), 42% (Careya arborea), and 72% (Dillenia indica) when elephants were absent from the ecosystem. Compensatory fruit removal by other animals substantially ameliorated these losses. For instance, reductions in successful dispersal of D. indica were as low as 23% when gaur (Bos gaurus) persisted, but median dispersal distance still declined from 30% (C. arborea) to 90% (A. chaplasha) without elephants. Our results support the theory that the largest animal species in an ecosystem have nonredundant ecological functionality and that their extirpation is likely to lead to the deterioration of ecosystem processes such as seed dispersal. This effect is likely accentuated by the overall defaunation of many tropical systems.

La No-Redundancia Funcional de Elefantes en un Bosque Tropical Perturbado

Resumen
Los esfuerzos de conservación están motivados frecuentemente por la amenaza de la extinción global. Si los conservacionistas tuvieran más información que sugiriera que la extirpación de una especie individual podría resultar en efectos ecológicos no deseados, podrían intentar con mayor frecuencia proteger o restaurar dichas especies a lo largo de sus extensiones aunque no estuvieran en peligro a nivel mundial. Los científicos rara vez han medido o pronosticado cuantitativamente las consecuencias funcionales de la pérdida de especies, incluso para especies grandes con disposición a la extinción que la teoría sugiere deberían ser únicas funcionalmente. Medimos la contribución de los elefantes asiáticos (Elephas maximus) a la dispersión de tres especies de frutos grandes en un bosque tropical húmedo perturbado y pronosticamos la extensión a la que los dispersores alternativos podrían compensar por los elefantes en su ausencia. Creamos un modelo empírico de probabilidad con datos de frugivoría y dispersión de semillas en la Reserva de Tigres Buxa, India. Estos datos se utilizaron para estimar la proporción de semillas consumidas por elefantes y otros frugívoros que sobreviven al manejo y los procesos dependientes de la densidad (efectos Janzen-Connell y la competencia co-específica en las excretas) y después germinan. Sin la compensación, el número de semillas dispersadas y sobrevivientes a los efectos dependientes de la densidad disminuyó 26 % (Artocarpus chaplasha), 42% (Careya arborea), y 72% (Dillenia indica) cuando los elefantes fueron extirpados. La remoción compensatoria de frutos por parte de otros animales mejoró sustancialmente estás pérdidas. Por ejemplo, las reducciones en la dispersión exitosa de D. indica fueron tan bajas como el 23 % cuando el gaúr (Bos gaurus) persistió, pero la distancia promedio de dispersión todavía declinó de un 30 % (C. arborea) a un 90 % (A. chaplasha) sin los elefantes. Nuestros resultados respaldan la teoría de que las grandes especies tienen una funcionalidad no-redundante en un ecosistema y que su extirpación es probable que derive en el deterioro de los procesos del ecosistema, como la dispersión de semillas. Este efecto probablemente está acentuado por la defaunación general de muchos sistemas tropicales.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12904" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12904</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carly N. Cook, Rebecca S. Valkan, Michael B. Mascia, Melodie A. McGeoch</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-09T10:40:26.572219-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12904</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12904</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12904</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The use of total area protected as the predominant indicator of progress in building protected area (PA) networks is receiving growing criticism. Documenting the full dynamics of PA networks, both in terms of the gains and losses in protection, provides a much more informative approach to tracking progress. To this end, documentation of PA downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) has increased. Studies of PADDD events generally fail to place these losses in the context of gains in protection; therefore, they omit important elements of PA network dynamics. To address this limitation, we used a spatially explicit approach to identify every parcel of land added to and excised from the Australian terrestrial PA network and PAs that had their level of protection changed over 17 years (1997–2014). By quantifying changes in the spatial configuration of the PA network with time-series data (spatial layers for nine separate time steps), ours is the first assessment of the dynamics (increases and decreases in area and level of protection) of a PA network and the first comprehensive assessment of PADDD in a developed country. We found that the Australian network was highly dynamic; there were 5233 changes in area or level of protection over 17 years. Against a background of enormous increases in area protected, we identified over 1500 PADDD events, which affected over one-third of the network, which were largely the result of widespread downgrading of protection. We believe our approach provides a mechanism for robust tracking of trends in the world's PAs through the use of data from the World Database on Protected Areas. However, this will require greater transparency and improved data standards in reporting changes to PAs.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12904-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Cuantificación de la Extensión de la Degradación, Reducción y Pérdida de Protección Legal de las Áreas Protegidas en Australia</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12904-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El uso del área total protegida como indicador predominante del progreso en la construcción de redes de áreas protegidas (AP) cada vez recibe más críticas. La documentación de las dinámicas completas de las redes de AP, tanto en términos de ganancia y pérdida de protección, proporciona una estrategia mucho más informativa al seguimiento del progreso. Para este fin, la documentación de la degradación, reducción y pérdida de protección legal (PADDD, en inglés) de las áreas protegidas ha incrementado. Los estudios de eventos de PADDD generalmente fallan en ubicar estas pérdidas en el contexto de la ganancia de protección, por lo que omiten elementos importantes de dinámicas de redes de AP. Para enfocarnos en esta limitación utilizamos una estrategia espacialmente explícita para identificar cada lote de suelo añadido y extirpado de la red australiana de AP terrestres y las AP que sufrieron un cambio en su nivel de protección durante 17 años (1997 – 2014). Con la cuantificación de los cambios en la configuración espacial de la red de AP con datos de series de tiempo (capas espaciales para nueve pasos temporales separados), realizamos la primera valoración de las dinámicas (incrementos y decrementos en el área y en el nivel de protección) de una red de AP y la primera valoración comprensiva del PADDD en un país desarrollado. Encontramos que la red australiana era altamente dinámica: hubo 5, 233 cambios en el área o en el nivel de protección durante 17 años. Frente a un fondo de incrementos enormes en el área protegida, identificamos más de 1, 500 eventos de PADDD, los cuales afectaron más de un tercio de la red y que eran en general el resultado de una degradación extensiva de la protección. Creemos que nuestra estrategia proporciona un mecanismo para el seguimiento convincente de las tendencias de las AP mundiales con el uso de datos de la Base de Datos Mundial de Áreas Protegidas. Sin embargo, esto requerirá de mayor transparencia y estándares de datos mejorados en el reporte de los cambios en las AP.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The use of total area protected as the predominant indicator of progress in building protected area (PA) networks is receiving growing criticism. Documenting the full dynamics of PA networks, both in terms of the gains and losses in protection, provides a much more informative approach to tracking progress. To this end, documentation of PA downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) has increased. Studies of PADDD events generally fail to place these losses in the context of gains in protection; therefore, they omit important elements of PA network dynamics. To address this limitation, we used a spatially explicit approach to identify every parcel of land added to and excised from the Australian terrestrial PA network and PAs that had their level of protection changed over 17 years (1997–2014). By quantifying changes in the spatial configuration of the PA network with time-series data (spatial layers for nine separate time steps), ours is the first assessment of the dynamics (increases and decreases in area and level of protection) of a PA network and the first comprehensive assessment of PADDD in a developed country. We found that the Australian network was highly dynamic; there were 5233 changes in area or level of protection over 17 years. Against a background of enormous increases in area protected, we identified over 1500 PADDD events, which affected over one-third of the network, which were largely the result of widespread downgrading of protection. We believe our approach provides a mechanism for robust tracking of trends in the world's PAs through the use of data from the World Database on Protected Areas. However, this will require greater transparency and improved data standards in reporting changes to PAs.


Cuantificación de la Extensión de la Degradación, Reducción y Pérdida de Protección Legal de las Áreas Protegidas en Australia

Resumen
El uso del área total protegida como indicador predominante del progreso en la construcción de redes de áreas protegidas (AP) cada vez recibe más críticas. La documentación de las dinámicas completas de las redes de AP, tanto en términos de ganancia y pérdida de protección, proporciona una estrategia mucho más informativa al seguimiento del progreso. Para este fin, la documentación de la degradación, reducción y pérdida de protección legal (PADDD, en inglés) de las áreas protegidas ha incrementado. Los estudios de eventos de PADDD generalmente fallan en ubicar estas pérdidas en el contexto de la ganancia de protección, por lo que omiten elementos importantes de dinámicas de redes de AP. Para enfocarnos en esta limitación utilizamos una estrategia espacialmente explícita para identificar cada lote de suelo añadido y extirpado de la red australiana de AP terrestres y las AP que sufrieron un cambio en su nivel de protección durante 17 años (1997 – 2014). Con la cuantificación de los cambios en la configuración espacial de la red de AP con datos de series de tiempo (capas espaciales para nueve pasos temporales separados), realizamos la primera valoración de las dinámicas (incrementos y decrementos en el área y en el nivel de protección) de una red de AP y la primera valoración comprensiva del PADDD en un país desarrollado. Encontramos que la red australiana era altamente dinámica: hubo 5, 233 cambios en el área o en el nivel de protección durante 17 años. Frente a un fondo de incrementos enormes en el área protegida, identificamos más de 1, 500 eventos de PADDD, los cuales afectaron más de un tercio de la red y que eran en general el resultado de una degradación extensiva de la protección. Creemos que nuestra estrategia proporciona un mecanismo para el seguimiento convincente de las tendencias de las AP mundiales con el uso de datos de la Base de Datos Mundial de Áreas Protegidas. Sin embargo, esto requerirá de mayor transparencia y estándares de datos mejorados en el reporte de los cambios en las AP.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12912" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12912</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew J. Colloff, Sandra Lavorel, Lorrae E. Kerkhoff, Carina A. Wyborn, Ioan Fazey, Russell Gorddard, Georgina M. Mace, Wendy B. Foden, Michael Dunlop, I. Colin Prentice, John Crowley, Paul Leadley, Patrick Degeorges</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-09T09:13:13.520671-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12912</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12912</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12912</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We examine issues to consider when reframing conservation science and practice in the context of global change. New framings of the links between ecosystems and society are emerging that are changing peoples’ values and expectations of nature, resulting in plural perspectives on conservation. Reframing conservation for global change can thus be regarded as a stage in the evolving relationship between people and nature rather than some recent trend. New models of how conservation links with transformative adaptation include how decision contexts for conservation can be reframed and integrated with an adaptation pathways approach to create new options for global-change-ready conservation. New relationships for conservation science and governance include coproduction of knowledge that supports social learning. New processes for implementing adaptation for conservation outcomes include deliberate practices used to develop new strategies, shift world views, work with conflict, address power and intergenerational equity in decisions, and build consciousness and creativity that empower agents to act. We argue that reframing conservation for global change requires scientists and practitioners to implement approaches unconstrained by discipline and sectoral boundaries, geopolitical polarities, or technical problematization. We consider a stronger focus on inclusive creation of knowledge and the interaction of this knowledge with societal values and rules is likely to result in conservation science and practice that meets the challenges of a postnormal world.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12912-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Transformación de la Ciencia y la Práctica de la Conservación para un Mundo Pos-Normal</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12912-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Examinamos cuestiones para considerar cuándo se deben modificar los marcos de trabajo de la ciencia y la práctica de la conservación en el contexto del cambio global. Nuevos marcos de trabajo sobre las conexiones entre los ecosistemas y la sociedad están emergiendo y están cambiando los valores de las personas y las expectativas de la naturaleza, lo que resulta en perspectivas plurales sobre la conservación. La modificación de los marcos de trabajo de la conservación para el cambio global puede por lo tanto ser considerado como una fase de la relación en evolución entre la gente y la naturaleza, en lugar de una tendencia reciente. Los nuevos modelos sobre sobre la relación de la conservación con la adaptación transformativa incluyen la forma en que los contextos de las decisiones pueden ser re-enmarcados e integrados dentro de una estrategia de vías de adaptación para crear nuevas opciones para la conservación lista para el cambio global. Las nuevas relaciones para la ciencia de la conservación y la gobernanza incluyen la co-producción de conocimiento que apoye el aprendizaje social. Los nuevos procesos para la implementación de la adaptación para resultados de conservación incluyen prácticas deliberadas usadas para desarrollar estrategias nuevas, cambiar las visiones globales, trabajar con el conflicto, dirigirse al poder y a la equidad intergeneracional en las decisiones, y construir conciencia y creatividad que empodere a los agentes para actuar. Argumentamos que la modificación de los marcos de trabajo de la conservación para el cambio global requiere que los científicos y los practicantes implementen estrategias que no estén restringidas por disciplina ni fronteras sectoriales, polaridades geopolíticas, o problemas técnicos. Consideramos que un mayor enfoque en la creación inclusiva del conocimiento y la interacción de este conocimiento con los valores y las reglas sociales probablemente resulten en una ciencia y práctica de la conservación que cumpla con los retos de un mundo pos-normal.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

We examine issues to consider when reframing conservation science and practice in the context of global change. New framings of the links between ecosystems and society are emerging that are changing peoples’ values and expectations of nature, resulting in plural perspectives on conservation. Reframing conservation for global change can thus be regarded as a stage in the evolving relationship between people and nature rather than some recent trend. New models of how conservation links with transformative adaptation include how decision contexts for conservation can be reframed and integrated with an adaptation pathways approach to create new options for global-change-ready conservation. New relationships for conservation science and governance include coproduction of knowledge that supports social learning. New processes for implementing adaptation for conservation outcomes include deliberate practices used to develop new strategies, shift world views, work with conflict, address power and intergenerational equity in decisions, and build consciousness and creativity that empower agents to act. We argue that reframing conservation for global change requires scientists and practitioners to implement approaches unconstrained by discipline and sectoral boundaries, geopolitical polarities, or technical problematization. We consider a stronger focus on inclusive creation of knowledge and the interaction of this knowledge with societal values and rules is likely to result in conservation science and practice that meets the challenges of a postnormal world.


Transformación de la Ciencia y la Práctica de la Conservación para un Mundo Pos-Normal

Resumen
Examinamos cuestiones para considerar cuándo se deben modificar los marcos de trabajo de la ciencia y la práctica de la conservación en el contexto del cambio global. Nuevos marcos de trabajo sobre las conexiones entre los ecosistemas y la sociedad están emergiendo y están cambiando los valores de las personas y las expectativas de la naturaleza, lo que resulta en perspectivas plurales sobre la conservación. La modificación de los marcos de trabajo de la conservación para el cambio global puede por lo tanto ser considerado como una fase de la relación en evolución entre la gente y la naturaleza, en lugar de una tendencia reciente. Los nuevos modelos sobre sobre la relación de la conservación con la adaptación transformativa incluyen la forma en que los contextos de las decisiones pueden ser re-enmarcados e integrados dentro de una estrategia de vías de adaptación para crear nuevas opciones para la conservación lista para el cambio global. Las nuevas relaciones para la ciencia de la conservación y la gobernanza incluyen la co-producción de conocimiento que apoye el aprendizaje social. Los nuevos procesos para la implementación de la adaptación para resultados de conservación incluyen prácticas deliberadas usadas para desarrollar estrategias nuevas, cambiar las visiones globales, trabajar con el conflicto, dirigirse al poder y a la equidad intergeneracional en las decisiones, y construir conciencia y creatividad que empodere a los agentes para actuar. Argumentamos que la modificación de los marcos de trabajo de la conservación para el cambio global requiere que los científicos y los practicantes implementen estrategias que no estén restringidas por disciplina ni fronteras sectoriales, polaridades geopolíticas, o problemas técnicos. Consideramos que un mayor enfoque en la creación inclusiva del conocimiento y la interacción de este conocimiento con los valores y las reglas sociales probablemente resulten en una ciencia y práctica de la conservación que cumpla con los retos de un mundo pos-normal.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12914" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>On the functional extinction of the Passenger Pigeon</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12914</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">On the functional extinction of the Passenger Pigeon</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David L. Roberts, Ivan Jarić, Andrew R. Solow</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-06T05:10:52.84632-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12914</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12914</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12914</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Research Note</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The Passenger Pigeon <span class="fixed-roman">(Ectopistes migratorius)</span> was a social breeder, and it has been suggested that the species experienced functional extinction, defined as a total reproductive failure, prior to its actual extinction in the early years of the 20th century. We applied a novel randomization test based on the relative times of the most recent egg- and skin-specimen sightings (i.e., recorded date of specimen collection) to test for functional extinction. For a total of 6 eggs and 27 skins, the observed significance level was 0.38, which indicated that the species did not become functionally extinct. Thus, proposals to reverse its rapid decline in the late 19th century could have been successful.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12914-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Sobre la Extinción Funcional de la Paloma Pasajera</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12914-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La paloma pasajera <span class="fixed-roman">(Ectopistes migratorius)</span> era una reproductora social y se ha sugerido que la especie pasó por una extinción funcional, definida como una falla reproductiva total, previa a su extinción biológica a principios del siglo XX. Aplicamos una prueba de aleatoriedad novedosa basada en los tiempos relativos de los avistamientos más recientes de huevos y piel (es decir, la fecha registrada de la recolección del espécimen) para analizar si hubo extinción funcional. Para un total de seis huevos y 27 pieles, el nivel de la significancia observada fue de 0.38, lo que indica que la especie no se extinguió funcionalmente. Por consiguiente, las propuestas para revertir su rápida declinación a finales del siglo XIX podrían haber sido exitosas.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius) was a social breeder, and it has been suggested that the species experienced functional extinction, defined as a total reproductive failure, prior to its actual extinction in the early years of the 20th century. We applied a novel randomization test based on the relative times of the most recent egg- and skin-specimen sightings (i.e., recorded date of specimen collection) to test for functional extinction. For a total of 6 eggs and 27 skins, the observed significance level was 0.38, which indicated that the species did not become functionally extinct. Thus, proposals to reverse its rapid decline in the late 19th century could have been successful.


Sobre la Extinción Funcional de la Paloma Pasajera

Resumen
La paloma pasajera (Ectopistes migratorius) era una reproductora social y se ha sugerido que la especie pasó por una extinción funcional, definida como una falla reproductiva total, previa a su extinción biológica a principios del siglo XX. Aplicamos una prueba de aleatoriedad novedosa basada en los tiempos relativos de los avistamientos más recientes de huevos y piel (es decir, la fecha registrada de la recolección del espécimen) para analizar si hubo extinción funcional. Para un total de seis huevos y 27 pieles, el nivel de la significancia observada fue de 0.38, lo que indica que la especie no se extinguió funcionalmente. Por consiguiente, las propuestas para revertir su rápida declinación a finales del siglo XIX podrían haber sido exitosas.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12920" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using environmental heterogeneity to plan for sea-level rise</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12920</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using environmental heterogeneity to plan for sea-level rise</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth A. Hunter, Nathan P. Nibbelink</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-06T05:00:26.574933-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12920</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12920</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12920</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Environmental heterogeneity is increasingly being used to select conservation areas that will provide for future biodiversity under a variety of climate scenarios. This approach, termed conserving nature's stage (CNS), assumes environmental features respond to climate change more slowly than biological communities, but will CNS be effective if the stage were to change as rapidly as the climate? We tested the effectiveness of using CNS to select sites in salt marshes for conservation in coastal Georgia (U.S.A.), where environmental features will change rapidly as sea level rises. We calculated species diversity based on distributions of 7 bird species with a variety of niches in Georgia salt marshes. Environmental heterogeneity was assessed across six landscape gradients (e.g., elevation, salinity, and patch area). We used 2 approaches to select sites with high environmental heterogeneity: site complementarity (environmental diversity [ED]) and local environmental heterogeneity (environmental richness [ER]). Sites selected based on ER predicted present-day species diversity better than randomly selected sites (up to an 8.1% improvement), were resilient to areal loss from SLR (1.0% average areal loss by 2050 compared with 0.9% loss of randomly selected sites), and provided habitat to a threatened species (0.63 average occupancy compared with 0.6 average occupancy of randomly selected sites). Sites selected based on ED predicted species diversity no better or worse than random and were not resilient to SLR (2.9% average areal loss by 2050). Despite the discrepancy between the 2 approaches, CNS is a viable strategy for conservation site selection in salt marshes because the ER approach was successful. It has potential for application in other coastal areas where SLR will affect environmental features, but its performance may depend on the magnitude of geological changes caused by SLR. Our results indicate that conservation planners that had heretofore excluded low-lying coasts from CNS planning could include coastal ecosystems in regional conservation strategies.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12920-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Uso de la Heterogeneidad Ambiental para Planificar Ante el Aumento del Nivel del Mar</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12920-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Cada vez se utiliza más la heterogeneidad ambiental para seleccionar las áreas de conservación que mantendrán en el futuro a la biodiversidad bajo una variedad de escenarios climáticos. Esta estrategia, llamada conservación del estado de la naturaleza (CEN), asume que las características ambientales responden al cambio climático más lentamente que las comunidades biológicas, ¿pero sería efectiva la CEN si el estado cambiara tan rápido como el clima? Probamos la efectividad del uso de la CEN para seleccionar sitios para conservación en marismas de agua salobre en las costas de Georgia (E.U.A.), en donde las características ambientales cambiarán tan rápido como aumente el nivel del mar. Calculamos la diversidad de especies con base en la distribución de siete especies de aves con una variedad de nichos en las marismas de agua salobre de Georgia. La heterogeneidad ambiental fue valorada a lo largo de seis gradientes del paisaje (p. ej.: elevación, salinidad y área del fragmento). Utilizamos dos estrategias para seleccionar sitios con heterogeneidad ambiental alta: complementariedad de sitio (diversidad ambiental [DA]) y heterogeneidad ambiental local (riqueza ambiental [RA]). Los sitios seleccionados con base en la RA pronosticaron la diversidad actual de las especies mejor que los sitios seleccionados al azar (una mejora de hasta el 8.1 %), fueron resilientes a la pérdida de área por el ANM (1.0 % de pérdida de área promedio para 2050 en comparación con 0.9 % de pérdida de los sitios seleccionados al azar), y proporcionaron hábitat a las especies amenazadas (0.63 de promedio de ocupación en comparación con 0.6 de ocupación de los sitios seleccionados al azar). Los sitios seleccionados con base en la DA pronosticaron la diversidad de especies de igual manera que los sitios seleccionados al azar y no fueron resilientes al ANM (2.9 % de pérdida de área promedio para 2050). A pesar de la discrepancia entre las dos estrategias, la CEN es una estrategia viable para la selección de sitios de conservación en una marisma de agua salobre porque la estrategia de RA fue exitosa. Esta estrategia tiene el potencial de aplicación en otras áreas costeras en donde el ANM afectará las características ambientales, pero su desempeño puede depender de la magnitud de los cambios geológicos causados por el ANM. Nuestros resultados indican que quienes planifican la conservación y hasta ahora habían excluido a las costas bajas de la planificación de la CEN podrían incluir a los ecosistemas costeros en las estrategias regionales de conservación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Environmental heterogeneity is increasingly being used to select conservation areas that will provide for future biodiversity under a variety of climate scenarios. This approach, termed conserving nature's stage (CNS), assumes environmental features respond to climate change more slowly than biological communities, but will CNS be effective if the stage were to change as rapidly as the climate? We tested the effectiveness of using CNS to select sites in salt marshes for conservation in coastal Georgia (U.S.A.), where environmental features will change rapidly as sea level rises. We calculated species diversity based on distributions of 7 bird species with a variety of niches in Georgia salt marshes. Environmental heterogeneity was assessed across six landscape gradients (e.g., elevation, salinity, and patch area). We used 2 approaches to select sites with high environmental heterogeneity: site complementarity (environmental diversity [ED]) and local environmental heterogeneity (environmental richness [ER]). Sites selected based on ER predicted present-day species diversity better than randomly selected sites (up to an 8.1% improvement), were resilient to areal loss from SLR (1.0% average areal loss by 2050 compared with 0.9% loss of randomly selected sites), and provided habitat to a threatened species (0.63 average occupancy compared with 0.6 average occupancy of randomly selected sites). Sites selected based on ED predicted species diversity no better or worse than random and were not resilient to SLR (2.9% average areal loss by 2050). Despite the discrepancy between the 2 approaches, CNS is a viable strategy for conservation site selection in salt marshes because the ER approach was successful. It has potential for application in other coastal areas where SLR will affect environmental features, but its performance may depend on the magnitude of geological changes caused by SLR. Our results indicate that conservation planners that had heretofore excluded low-lying coasts from CNS planning could include coastal ecosystems in regional conservation strategies.


Uso de la Heterogeneidad Ambiental para Planificar Ante el Aumento del Nivel del Mar

Resumen
Cada vez se utiliza más la heterogeneidad ambiental para seleccionar las áreas de conservación que mantendrán en el futuro a la biodiversidad bajo una variedad de escenarios climáticos. Esta estrategia, llamada conservación del estado de la naturaleza (CEN), asume que las características ambientales responden al cambio climático más lentamente que las comunidades biológicas, ¿pero sería efectiva la CEN si el estado cambiara tan rápido como el clima? Probamos la efectividad del uso de la CEN para seleccionar sitios para conservación en marismas de agua salobre en las costas de Georgia (E.U.A.), en donde las características ambientales cambiarán tan rápido como aumente el nivel del mar. Calculamos la diversidad de especies con base en la distribución de siete especies de aves con una variedad de nichos en las marismas de agua salobre de Georgia. La heterogeneidad ambiental fue valorada a lo largo de seis gradientes del paisaje (p. ej.: elevación, salinidad y área del fragmento). Utilizamos dos estrategias para seleccionar sitios con heterogeneidad ambiental alta: complementariedad de sitio (diversidad ambiental [DA]) y heterogeneidad ambiental local (riqueza ambiental [RA]). Los sitios seleccionados con base en la RA pronosticaron la diversidad actual de las especies mejor que los sitios seleccionados al azar (una mejora de hasta el 8.1 %), fueron resilientes a la pérdida de área por el ANM (1.0 % de pérdida de área promedio para 2050 en comparación con 0.9 % de pérdida de los sitios seleccionados al azar), y proporcionaron hábitat a las especies amenazadas (0.63 de promedio de ocupación en comparación con 0.6 de ocupación de los sitios seleccionados al azar). Los sitios seleccionados con base en la DA pronosticaron la diversidad de especies de igual manera que los sitios seleccionados al azar y no fueron resilientes al ANM (2.9 % de pérdida de área promedio para 2050). A pesar de la discrepancia entre las dos estrategias, la CEN es una estrategia viable para la selección de sitios de conservación en una marisma de agua salobre porque la estrategia de RA fue exitosa. Esta estrategia tiene el potencial de aplicación en otras áreas costeras en donde el ANM afectará las características ambientales, pero su desempeño puede depender de la magnitud de los cambios geológicos causados por el ANM. Nuestros resultados indican que quienes planifican la conservación y hasta ahora habían excluido a las costas bajas de la planificación de la CEN podrían incluir a los ecosistemas costeros en las estrategias regionales de conservación.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12915" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Importance of including cultural practices in ecological restoration</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12915</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Importance of including cultural practices in ecological restoration</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Priscilla M. Wehi, Janice M. Lord</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-06T04:46:08.381563-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12915</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12915</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12915</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Ecosystems worldwide have a long history of use and management by indigenous cultures. However, environmental degradation can reduce the availability of culturally important resources. Ecological restoration aims to repair damage to ecosystems caused by human activity, but it is unclear how often restoration projects incorporate the return of harvesting or traditional life patterns for indigenous communities. We examined the incorporation of cultural use of natural resources into ecological restoration in the context of a culturally important but protected New Zealand bird; among award-winning restoration projects in Australasia and worldwide; and in the peer-reviewed restoration ecology literature. Among New Zealand's culturally important bird species, differences in threat status and availability for hunting were large. These differences indicate the values of a colonizing culture can inhibit harvesting by indigenous people. In Australasia among award-winning ecological restoration projects, &lt;17% involved human use of restored areas beyond aesthetic or recreational use, despite many projects encouraging community participation. Globally, restoration goals differed among regions. For example, in North America, projects were primarily conservation oriented, whereas in Asia and Africa projects frequently focused on restoring cultural harvesting. From 1995 to 2014, the restoration ecology literature contained few references to cultural values or use. We argue that restoration practitioners are missing a vital component for reassembling functional ecosystems. Inclusion of sustainably harvestable areas within restored landscapes may allow for the continuation of traditional practices that shaped ecosystems for millennia, and also aid project success by ensuring community support.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12915-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>La Importancia de Incluir las Prácticas Culturales en la Restauración Ecológica</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12915-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los ecosistemas en todo el mundo tienen una larga historia de uso y manejo por parte de las culturas indígenas. Sin embargo, la degradación ambiental puede reducir la disponibilidad de los recursos con importancia cultural. La restauración ecológica busca reparar el daño a los ecosistemas causado por la actividad humana, pero no está claro cuán seguido los proyectos de restauración incorporan el regreso de los patrones de cultivo o de vida tradicional de las comunidades indígenas. Examinamos la incorporación del uso cultural de los recursos naturales dentro de la restauración ecológica en el contexto de un ave importante culturalmente, pero protegida en Nueva Zelanda; entre proyectos de restauración ecológica premiados en Australasia y a nivel mundial; y en la literatura de restauración revisada por colegas. Entre las especies de aves con importancia cultural en Nueva Zelanda, las diferencias entre el estado de amenaza y la disponibilidad para la caza fueron grandes. Estas diferencias sugieren que los valores de una cultura que coloniza pueden inhibir la cosecha por parte de los habitantes indígenas. Entre los proyectos de restauración ecológica premiados en Australasia, &lt;17 % involucró el uso humano de las áreas restauradas más allá del uso recreativo o estético, a pesar de que muchos proyectos alentaban la participación comunitaria. A nivel mundial, los objetivos de restauración difirieron entre las regiones. Por ejemplo, la mayoría de los proyectos en América del Norte estaban orientados hacia la conservación, mientras que en Asia y en África los proyectos comúnmente se enfocaban en la restauración de la cosecha cultural. De 1995 y hasta 2014 la literatura de la ecología de la restauración contenía pocas referencias a los valores o al uso cultural. Argumentamos que a los restauradores les falta un componente vital para el reensamblaje de los ecosistemas funcionales. La inclusión de las áreas sustentablemente cosechables dentro de los paisajes restaurados puede no sólo permitir la continuación de las prácticas tradicionales que dieron forma a los ecosistemas durante milenios, sino también apoyar en el éxito de los proyectos al asegurar el apoyo de la comunidad.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Ecosystems worldwide have a long history of use and management by indigenous cultures. However, environmental degradation can reduce the availability of culturally important resources. Ecological restoration aims to repair damage to ecosystems caused by human activity, but it is unclear how often restoration projects incorporate the return of harvesting or traditional life patterns for indigenous communities. We examined the incorporation of cultural use of natural resources into ecological restoration in the context of a culturally important but protected New Zealand bird; among award-winning restoration projects in Australasia and worldwide; and in the peer-reviewed restoration ecology literature. Among New Zealand's culturally important bird species, differences in threat status and availability for hunting were large. These differences indicate the values of a colonizing culture can inhibit harvesting by indigenous people. In Australasia among award-winning ecological restoration projects, &lt;17% involved human use of restored areas beyond aesthetic or recreational use, despite many projects encouraging community participation. Globally, restoration goals differed among regions. For example, in North America, projects were primarily conservation oriented, whereas in Asia and Africa projects frequently focused on restoring cultural harvesting. From 1995 to 2014, the restoration ecology literature contained few references to cultural values or use. We argue that restoration practitioners are missing a vital component for reassembling functional ecosystems. Inclusion of sustainably harvestable areas within restored landscapes may allow for the continuation of traditional practices that shaped ecosystems for millennia, and also aid project success by ensuring community support.


La Importancia de Incluir las Prácticas Culturales en la Restauración Ecológica

Resumen
Los ecosistemas en todo el mundo tienen una larga historia de uso y manejo por parte de las culturas indígenas. Sin embargo, la degradación ambiental puede reducir la disponibilidad de los recursos con importancia cultural. La restauración ecológica busca reparar el daño a los ecosistemas causado por la actividad humana, pero no está claro cuán seguido los proyectos de restauración incorporan el regreso de los patrones de cultivo o de vida tradicional de las comunidades indígenas. Examinamos la incorporación del uso cultural de los recursos naturales dentro de la restauración ecológica en el contexto de un ave importante culturalmente, pero protegida en Nueva Zelanda; entre proyectos de restauración ecológica premiados en Australasia y a nivel mundial; y en la literatura de restauración revisada por colegas. Entre las especies de aves con importancia cultural en Nueva Zelanda, las diferencias entre el estado de amenaza y la disponibilidad para la caza fueron grandes. Estas diferencias sugieren que los valores de una cultura que coloniza pueden inhibir la cosecha por parte de los habitantes indígenas. Entre los proyectos de restauración ecológica premiados en Australasia, &lt;17 % involucró el uso humano de las áreas restauradas más allá del uso recreativo o estético, a pesar de que muchos proyectos alentaban la participación comunitaria. A nivel mundial, los objetivos de restauración difirieron entre las regiones. Por ejemplo, la mayoría de los proyectos en América del Norte estaban orientados hacia la conservación, mientras que en Asia y en África los proyectos comúnmente se enfocaban en la restauración de la cosecha cultural. De 1995 y hasta 2014 la literatura de la ecología de la restauración contenía pocas referencias a los valores o al uso cultural. Argumentamos que a los restauradores les falta un componente vital para el reensamblaje de los ecosistemas funcionales. La inclusión de las áreas sustentablemente cosechables dentro de los paisajes restaurados puede no sólo permitir la continuación de las prácticas tradicionales que dieron forma a los ecosistemas durante milenios, sino también apoyar en el éxito de los proyectos al asegurar el apoyo de la comunidad.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12906" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Interpreting beta-diversity components over time to conserve metacommunities in highly dynamic ecosystems</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12906</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Interpreting beta-diversity components over time to conserve metacommunities in highly dynamic ecosystems</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Albert Ruhí, Thibault Datry, John L. Sabo</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-29T04:28:17.495424-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12906</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12906</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12906</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Methods Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The concept of metacommunity (i.e., a set of local communities linked by dispersal) has gained great popularity among community ecologists. However, metacommunity research mostly addresses questions on spatial patterns of biodiversity at the regional scale, whereas conservation planning requires quantifying temporal variation in those metacommunities and the contributions that individual (local) sites make to regional dynamics. We propose that recent advances in diversity-partitioning methods may allow for a better understanding of metacommunity dynamics and the identification of keystone sites. We used time series of the 2 components of beta diversity (richness and replacement) and the contributions of local sites to these components to examine which sites controlled source-sink dynamics in a highly dynamic model system (an intermittent river). The relative importance of the richness and replacement components of beta diversity fluctuated over time, and sample aggregation led to underestimation of beta diversity by up to 35%. Our literature review revealed that research on intermittent rivers would benefit greatly from examination of beta-diversity components over time. Adequately appraising spatiotemporal variability in community composition and identifying sites that are pivotal for maintaining biodiversity at the landscape scale are key needs for conservation prioritization and planning. Thus, our framework may be used to guide conservation actions in highly dynamic ecosystems when time-series data describing biodiversity across sites connected by dispersal are available.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12906-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Interpretación de los Componentes de la Beta Diversidad en el Tiempo para Conservar Metacomunidades en Ecosistemas Muy Dinámicos</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12906-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El concepto de metacomunidad (i. e., un conjunto de comunidades locales conectadas por dispersión) ha ganado gran popularidad entre los ecólogos de comunidades. Sin embargo, la investigación sobre metacomunidades aborda mayormente preguntas sobre patrones espaciales de biodiversidad a escala regional, mientras que la planificación de la conservación requiere cuantificar la variación temporal en esas metacomunidades y las contribuciones de los sitios individuales a la dinámica regional. Proponemos que los avances recientes en los métodos de partición de la diversidad permiten un mejor entendimiento de la dinámica de metacomunidades y la identificación de sitios clave. Utilizamos series temporales de los dos componentes de la beta diversidad (riqueza y reemplazo) y las contribuciones de los sitios locales a esos componentes para examinar cuáles sitios controlaban la dinámica fuente-sumidero en un sistema muy dinámico (un río intermitente). La importancia relativa de los componentes de riqueza y reemplazo de la beta diversidad fluctuaron a través del tiempo, y la agregación de muestras llevó a la subestimación de hasta el 35% de la beta diversidad. Nuestra revisión de literatura reveló que la investigación sobre ríos intermitentes se podría beneficiar del examen de los componentes de la beta diversidad a través del tiempo. La evaluación adecuada de la variabilidad espaciotemporal de la composición y la identificación de sitios que son esenciales para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad a escala de paisaje son necesidades claves para la priorización y planificación de la conservación. Por lo tanto, nuestro marco de referencia puede ser utilizado para guiar acciones de conservación en ecosistemas muy dinámicos cuando se dispone de datos de series temporales que describen biodiversidad en sitios conectados por dispersión.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The concept of metacommunity (i.e., a set of local communities linked by dispersal) has gained great popularity among community ecologists. However, metacommunity research mostly addresses questions on spatial patterns of biodiversity at the regional scale, whereas conservation planning requires quantifying temporal variation in those metacommunities and the contributions that individual (local) sites make to regional dynamics. We propose that recent advances in diversity-partitioning methods may allow for a better understanding of metacommunity dynamics and the identification of keystone sites. We used time series of the 2 components of beta diversity (richness and replacement) and the contributions of local sites to these components to examine which sites controlled source-sink dynamics in a highly dynamic model system (an intermittent river). The relative importance of the richness and replacement components of beta diversity fluctuated over time, and sample aggregation led to underestimation of beta diversity by up to 35%. Our literature review revealed that research on intermittent rivers would benefit greatly from examination of beta-diversity components over time. Adequately appraising spatiotemporal variability in community composition and identifying sites that are pivotal for maintaining biodiversity at the landscape scale are key needs for conservation prioritization and planning. Thus, our framework may be used to guide conservation actions in highly dynamic ecosystems when time-series data describing biodiversity across sites connected by dispersal are available.


Interpretación de los Componentes de la Beta Diversidad en el Tiempo para Conservar Metacomunidades en Ecosistemas Muy Dinámicos

Resumen
El concepto de metacomunidad (i. e., un conjunto de comunidades locales conectadas por dispersión) ha ganado gran popularidad entre los ecólogos de comunidades. Sin embargo, la investigación sobre metacomunidades aborda mayormente preguntas sobre patrones espaciales de biodiversidad a escala regional, mientras que la planificación de la conservación requiere cuantificar la variación temporal en esas metacomunidades y las contribuciones de los sitios individuales a la dinámica regional. Proponemos que los avances recientes en los métodos de partición de la diversidad permiten un mejor entendimiento de la dinámica de metacomunidades y la identificación de sitios clave. Utilizamos series temporales de los dos componentes de la beta diversidad (riqueza y reemplazo) y las contribuciones de los sitios locales a esos componentes para examinar cuáles sitios controlaban la dinámica fuente-sumidero en un sistema muy dinámico (un río intermitente). La importancia relativa de los componentes de riqueza y reemplazo de la beta diversidad fluctuaron a través del tiempo, y la agregación de muestras llevó a la subestimación de hasta el 35% de la beta diversidad. Nuestra revisión de literatura reveló que la investigación sobre ríos intermitentes se podría beneficiar del examen de los componentes de la beta diversidad a través del tiempo. La evaluación adecuada de la variabilidad espaciotemporal de la composición y la identificación de sitios que son esenciales para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad a escala de paisaje son necesidades claves para la priorización y planificación de la conservación. Por lo tanto, nuestro marco de referencia puede ser utilizado para guiar acciones de conservación en ecosistemas muy dinámicos cuando se dispone de datos de series temporales que describen biodiversidad en sitios conectados por dispersión.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12910" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using environmental DNA to assess population-wide spatiotemporal reserve use</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12910</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using environmental DNA to assess population-wide spatiotemporal reserve use</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathryn Stewart, Hongjuan Ma, Jinsong Zheng, Jianfu Zhao</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-27T04:40:33.478279-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12910</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12910</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12910</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Scientists increasingly rely on protected areas to assist in biodiversity conservation, yet the efficacy of these areas is rarely systematically assessed, often because of underfunding. Still, adaptive management strategies to maximize conservation success often rely on understanding the temporal and spatial dynamism of populations therein. Examination of environmental DNA (eDNA) is a time and cost-effective way to monitor species’ distribution, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides information on organismal abundance. To date, however, such techniques remain underused for population assessments in protected areas. We determined eDNA concentration of the critically endangered Yangtze finless porpoise <i>(Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis)</i> to describe its occurrence, range, and use of the Tian e-Zhou National Nature Reserve in Hubei, China, across seasons and hydrological depths. Despite the observation that total eDNA concentrations were highest in surface waters in summer, finless porpoise eDNA concentrations were significantly higher in deeper waters than in surface waters in summer. During the breeding season (spring), eDNA signals were site specific and restricted to the core area of the reserve. However, postbreeding eDNA concentrations were widespread across the reserve, encompassing sites previously thought to be unfrequented by the species. Our results suggest spatiotemporal idiosyncrasies in site, depth, and seasonal use of the reserve and a propensity for postbreeding population dispersal. With eDNA and qPCR we were able to assess an entire population's use of a protected area. Illuminating nuances in habitat use via eDNA could be valuable to set pragmatic conservation goals for this, and other, species.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12910-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Utilización de ADN Ambiental para Valorar el Uso Espacio-Temporal de Reserva a Nivel Poblacional</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12910-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los científicos dependen cada vez más de las áreas protegidas para apoyar en la conservación de la biodiversidad, aunque la eficiencia de estas áreas es rara vez valorada sistemáticamente, casi siempre por falta de fondos. A pesar de esto, las estrategias de manejo adaptativo para maximizar el éxito de la conservación dependen comúnmente del entendimiento del dinamismo temporal y espacial de las poblaciones allí dentro. La examinación del ADN ambiental (ADNa) es una forma rentable y ahorradora de tiempo para monitorear la distribución de las especies y la reacción en cadena cuantitativa de la polimerasa (qPCR) proporciona información sobre la abundancia de los organismos. Sin embargo, a la fecha, dichas técnicas siguen siendo subutilizadas para la valoración de poblaciones en áreas protegidas. Determinamos la concentración de ADNa del delfín sin aleta del Yangtze <i>(Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis)</i>, una especie en peligro crítico de extinción, para describir su presencia, extensión y uso de la Reserva Natural de Tian e-Zhou en Hubei, China, a lo largo de temporadas anuales y profundidades hidrológicas. Aunque las concentraciones de ADNa total fueron mayores en las aguas someras durante el verano, las concentraciones de ADNa del delfín sin aleta fueron significativamente mayores en aguas más profundas que en las aguas someras durante el verano. Durante la temporada de reproducción (primavera), las señales de ADNa fueron específicas de sitio y estuvieron restringidas al área núcleo de la reserva. Sin embargo, las concentraciones de ADNa después de la temporada de reproducción estuvieron dispersadas ampliamente en toda la reserva, incluyendo sitios que previamente se creía no eran frecuentados por la especie. Nuestros resultados sugieren idiosincrasias espacio-temporales en el sitio, la profundidad y el uso estacional de la reserva y una tendencia hacia la dispersión poblacional después de la reproducción. Con el ADNa y la qPCR pudimos valorar el uso de un área protegida por parte de una población entera. Ilustrar los matices del uso del hábitat por medio del ADNa podría ser valioso para establecer objetivos pragmáticos de conservación para ésta y otras especies.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Scientists increasingly rely on protected areas to assist in biodiversity conservation, yet the efficacy of these areas is rarely systematically assessed, often because of underfunding. Still, adaptive management strategies to maximize conservation success often rely on understanding the temporal and spatial dynamism of populations therein. Examination of environmental DNA (eDNA) is a time and cost-effective way to monitor species’ distribution, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides information on organismal abundance. To date, however, such techniques remain underused for population assessments in protected areas. We determined eDNA concentration of the critically endangered Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis) to describe its occurrence, range, and use of the Tian e-Zhou National Nature Reserve in Hubei, China, across seasons and hydrological depths. Despite the observation that total eDNA concentrations were highest in surface waters in summer, finless porpoise eDNA concentrations were significantly higher in deeper waters than in surface waters in summer. During the breeding season (spring), eDNA signals were site specific and restricted to the core area of the reserve. However, postbreeding eDNA concentrations were widespread across the reserve, encompassing sites previously thought to be unfrequented by the species. Our results suggest spatiotemporal idiosyncrasies in site, depth, and seasonal use of the reserve and a propensity for postbreeding population dispersal. With eDNA and qPCR we were able to assess an entire population's use of a protected area. Illuminating nuances in habitat use via eDNA could be valuable to set pragmatic conservation goals for this, and other, species.


Utilización de ADN Ambiental para Valorar el Uso Espacio-Temporal de Reserva a Nivel Poblacional

Resumen
Los científicos dependen cada vez más de las áreas protegidas para apoyar en la conservación de la biodiversidad, aunque la eficiencia de estas áreas es rara vez valorada sistemáticamente, casi siempre por falta de fondos. A pesar de esto, las estrategias de manejo adaptativo para maximizar el éxito de la conservación dependen comúnmente del entendimiento del dinamismo temporal y espacial de las poblaciones allí dentro. La examinación del ADN ambiental (ADNa) es una forma rentable y ahorradora de tiempo para monitorear la distribución de las especies y la reacción en cadena cuantitativa de la polimerasa (qPCR) proporciona información sobre la abundancia de los organismos. Sin embargo, a la fecha, dichas técnicas siguen siendo subutilizadas para la valoración de poblaciones en áreas protegidas. Determinamos la concentración de ADNa del delfín sin aleta del Yangtze (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis), una especie en peligro crítico de extinción, para describir su presencia, extensión y uso de la Reserva Natural de Tian e-Zhou en Hubei, China, a lo largo de temporadas anuales y profundidades hidrológicas. Aunque las concentraciones de ADNa total fueron mayores en las aguas someras durante el verano, las concentraciones de ADNa del delfín sin aleta fueron significativamente mayores en aguas más profundas que en las aguas someras durante el verano. Durante la temporada de reproducción (primavera), las señales de ADNa fueron específicas de sitio y estuvieron restringidas al área núcleo de la reserva. Sin embargo, las concentraciones de ADNa después de la temporada de reproducción estuvieron dispersadas ampliamente en toda la reserva, incluyendo sitios que previamente se creía no eran frecuentados por la especie. Nuestros resultados sugieren idiosincrasias espacio-temporales en el sitio, la profundidad y el uso estacional de la reserva y una tendencia hacia la dispersión poblacional después de la reproducción. Con el ADNa y la qPCR pudimos valorar el uso de un área protegida por parte de una población entera. Ilustrar los matices del uso del hábitat por medio del ADNa podría ser valioso para establecer objetivos pragmáticos de conservación para ésta y otras especies.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12900" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Seabird mortality induced by land-based artificial lights</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12900</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seabird mortality induced by land-based artificial lights</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Airam Rodríguez, Nick D. Holmes, Peter G. Ryan, Kerry-Jayne Wilson, Lucie Faulquier, Yovana Murillo, André F. Raine, Jay F. Penniman, Verónica Neves, Beneharo Rodríguez, Juan J. Negro, André Chiaradia, Peter Dann, Tracy Anderson, Benjamin Metzger, Masaki Shirai, Lorna Deppe, Jennifer Wheeler, Peter Hodum, Catia Gouveia, Vanda Carmo, Gilberto P. Carreira, Luis Delgado-Alburqueque, Carlos Guerra-Correa, François-Xavier Couzi, Marc Travers, Matthieu Le Corre</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-17T05:25:56.276042-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12900</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12900</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12900</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Artificial lights at night cause high mortality of seabirds, one of the most endangered groups of birds globally. Fledglings of burrow-nesting seabirds, and to a lesser extent adults, are attracted to and then grounded (i.e., forced to land) by lights when they fly at night. We reviewed the current state of knowledge of seabird attraction to light to identify information gaps and propose measures to address the problem. Although species in families such as Alcidae and Anatidae can be grounded by artificial light, the most affected seabirds are petrels and shearwaters (Procellariiformes). At least 56 species of Procellariiformes, more than one-third of them (24) threatened, are subject to grounding by lights. Seabirds grounded by lights have been found worldwide, mainly on oceanic islands but also at some continental locations. Petrel breeding grounds confined to formerly uninhabited islands are particularly at risk from light pollution due to tourism and urban sprawl. Where it is impractical to ban external lights, rescue programs of grounded birds offer the most immediate and employed mitigation to reduce the rate of light-induced mortality and save thousands of birds every year. These programs also provide useful information for seabird management. However, these data are typically fragmentary, biased, and uncertain and can lead to inaccurate impact estimates and poor understanding of the phenomenon of seabird attraction to lights. We believe the most urgently needed actions to mitigate and understand light-induced mortality of seabirds are estimation of mortality and effects on populations; determination of threshold light levels and safe distances from light sources; documentation of the fate of rescued birds; improvement of rescue campaigns, particularly in terms of increasing recovery rates and level of care; and research on seabird-friendly lights to reduce attraction.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12900-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Mortalidad de Aves Marinas Producida por Luces Artificiales Terrestres</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12900-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las luces artificiales nocturnas causan una mortalidad alta de aves marinas, uno de los grupos de aves en mayor peligro de extinción a nivel mundial. Los polluelos de aves marinas que anidan en madrigueras, y en menor medida los adultos, son atraídos y forzados a aterrizar por las luces cuando vuelan de noche. Revisamos el estado actual del conocimiento sobre la atracción de las aves marinas por la luz para identificar vacíos de información y proponer medidas para resolver el problema. Aunque las especies de familias como Alcidae y Anatidae pueden ser forzadas a aterrizar por la luz artificial, las aves marinas más afectadas son los petreles y las pardelas (Procellariiformes). Por lo menos 56 especies de Procellariiformes, más de un tercio (24) de ellas amenazadas, son propensas al aterrizaje atraídas por las luces. Las aves marinas forzadas a aterrizar han sido halladas en todo el mundo, principalmente en islas oceánicas, pero también en algunas localidades continentales. Los sitios de anidación de los petreles confinados anteriormente a islas deshabitadas están particularmente en riesgo de sufrir contaminación lumínica debido al turismo y al crecimiento urbano. En donde no es práctico prohibir las luces externas, los programas de rescate de las aves accidentadas ofrecen la mitigación más inmediata y empleada para reducir la tasa de mortalidad inducida por la luz y salvar a miles de aves cada año. Estos programas también proporcionan información útil para el manejo de aves marinas. Sin embargo, estos datos están típicamente fragmentados, sesgados y son inciertos, y pueden llevar a estimaciones inexactas del impacto y a un entendimiento pobre del fenómeno de la atracción de las aves marinas por la luz. Creemos que las acciones necesarias de mayor urgencia para mitigar y entender la mortalidad de aves marinas producida por la luz son: la estimación de la mortalidad y los efectos sobre la población; la determinación de umbrales de niveles de luz y de distancias seguras a las fuentes de luz; el estudio del destino de las aves rescatadas; la mejora de las campañas de rescate, particularmente en términos de incrementar las tasas de recogida y el nivel de cuidado; y la investigación sobre las características de la luz para reducir la atracción de las aves marinas.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Artificial lights at night cause high mortality of seabirds, one of the most endangered groups of birds globally. Fledglings of burrow-nesting seabirds, and to a lesser extent adults, are attracted to and then grounded (i.e., forced to land) by lights when they fly at night. We reviewed the current state of knowledge of seabird attraction to light to identify information gaps and propose measures to address the problem. Although species in families such as Alcidae and Anatidae can be grounded by artificial light, the most affected seabirds are petrels and shearwaters (Procellariiformes). At least 56 species of Procellariiformes, more than one-third of them (24) threatened, are subject to grounding by lights. Seabirds grounded by lights have been found worldwide, mainly on oceanic islands but also at some continental locations. Petrel breeding grounds confined to formerly uninhabited islands are particularly at risk from light pollution due to tourism and urban sprawl. Where it is impractical to ban external lights, rescue programs of grounded birds offer the most immediate and employed mitigation to reduce the rate of light-induced mortality and save thousands of birds every year. These programs also provide useful information for seabird management. However, these data are typically fragmentary, biased, and uncertain and can lead to inaccurate impact estimates and poor understanding of the phenomenon of seabird attraction to lights. We believe the most urgently needed actions to mitigate and understand light-induced mortality of seabirds are estimation of mortality and effects on populations; determination of threshold light levels and safe distances from light sources; documentation of the fate of rescued birds; improvement of rescue campaigns, particularly in terms of increasing recovery rates and level of care; and research on seabird-friendly lights to reduce attraction.


Mortalidad de Aves Marinas Producida por Luces Artificiales Terrestres

Resumen
Las luces artificiales nocturnas causan una mortalidad alta de aves marinas, uno de los grupos de aves en mayor peligro de extinción a nivel mundial. Los polluelos de aves marinas que anidan en madrigueras, y en menor medida los adultos, son atraídos y forzados a aterrizar por las luces cuando vuelan de noche. Revisamos el estado actual del conocimiento sobre la atracción de las aves marinas por la luz para identificar vacíos de información y proponer medidas para resolver el problema. Aunque las especies de familias como Alcidae y Anatidae pueden ser forzadas a aterrizar por la luz artificial, las aves marinas más afectadas son los petreles y las pardelas (Procellariiformes). Por lo menos 56 especies de Procellariiformes, más de un tercio (24) de ellas amenazadas, son propensas al aterrizaje atraídas por las luces. Las aves marinas forzadas a aterrizar han sido halladas en todo el mundo, principalmente en islas oceánicas, pero también en algunas localidades continentales. Los sitios de anidación de los petreles confinados anteriormente a islas deshabitadas están particularmente en riesgo de sufrir contaminación lumínica debido al turismo y al crecimiento urbano. En donde no es práctico prohibir las luces externas, los programas de rescate de las aves accidentadas ofrecen la mitigación más inmediata y empleada para reducir la tasa de mortalidad inducida por la luz y salvar a miles de aves cada año. Estos programas también proporcionan información útil para el manejo de aves marinas. Sin embargo, estos datos están típicamente fragmentados, sesgados y son inciertos, y pueden llevar a estimaciones inexactas del impacto y a un entendimiento pobre del fenómeno de la atracción de las aves marinas por la luz. Creemos que las acciones necesarias de mayor urgencia para mitigar y entender la mortalidad de aves marinas producida por la luz son: la estimación de la mortalidad y los efectos sobre la población; la determinación de umbrales de niveles de luz y de distancias seguras a las fuentes de luz; el estudio del destino de las aves rescatadas; la mejora de las campañas de rescate, particularmente en términos de incrementar las tasas de recogida y el nivel de cuidado; y la investigación sobre las características de la luz para reducir la atracción de las aves marinas.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12946" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The Animal Trade</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12946</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Animal Trade</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-16T11:35:24.765823-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12946</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12946</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12946</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Noted with Interest</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12903" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using individual-condition measures to predict the long-term importance of habitat extent for population persistence</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12903</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using individual-condition measures to predict the long-term importance of habitat extent for population persistence</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anita J. Cosgrove, Todd J. McWhorter, Martine Maron</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-15T07:21:57.894664-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12903</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12903</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12903</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Habitat loss and fragmentation are causing widespread population declines, but identifying how and when to intervene remains challenging. Predicting where extirpations are likely to occur and implementing management actions before losses result may be more cost-effective than trying to reestablish lost populations. Early indicators of pressure on populations could be used to make such predictions. Previous work conducted in 2009 and 2010 identified that the presence of Eastern Yellow Robins (<span class="fixed-roman">Eopsaltria australis</span>) in 42 sites in a fragmented region of eastern Australia was unrelated to woodland extent within 500 m of a site, but the robins’ heterophil:lymphocyte (H:L) ratios (an indicator of chronic stress) were elevated at sites with low levels of surrounding woodland. We resurveyed these 42 sites in 2013 and 2014 for robin presence to determine whether the H:L ratios obtained in 2009 and 2010 predicted the locations of extirpations and whether the previous pattern in H:L ratios was an early sign that woodland extent would become an important predictor of occupancy. We also surveyed for robins at 43 additional sites to determine whether current occupancy could be better predicted by landscape context at a larger scale, relevant to dispersal movements. At the original 42 sites, H:L ratios and extirpations were not related, although only 4 extirpations were observed. Woodland extent within 500 m had become a strong predictor of occupancy. Taken together, these results provide mixed evidence as to whether patterns of individual condition can reveal habitat relationships that become evident as local shifts in occupancy occur but that are not revealed by a single snapshot of species distribution. Across all 85 sites, woodland extent at scales relevant to dispersal (5 km) was not related to occurrence. We recommend that conservation actions focus on regenerating areas of habitat large enough to support robin territories rather than increasing connectivity within the landscape.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12903-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Utilización de las Medidas Individuales de Condición para Pronosticar La Importancia a Largo Plazo de la Extensión del Hábitat para la Permanencia Poblacional</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12903-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La pérdida y fragmentación de los hábitats están causando declinaciones poblacionales extendidas, pero identificar cómo y cuándo intervenir todavía es un reto. Pronosticar en dónde es probable que ocurran las extirpaciones e implementar acciones de manejo previas a las pérdidas puede ser más rentable que restablecer las poblaciones perdidas. Los indicadores tempranos de presión sobre las poblaciones podrían utilizarse para realizar dichos pronósticos. Trabajos previos hechos en 2009 y en 2010 identificaron que la presencia de <span class="fixed-roman">Eopsaltria australis</span> en 42 sitios de una región fragmentada del este de Australia no estaba relacionada con la extensión de bosque dentro de 500 m del sitio, pero que el índice del heterofil:linfocito (H:L) de las aves era elevado en sitios con niveles bajos de bosque circundante. Volvimos a muestrear la presencia de las aves en estos 42 sitios en 2013 y en 2014 para determinar si los índices de H:L obtenidos en 2009 y en 2010 pronosticaban la ubicación de las extirpaciones y si el patrón previo en los índices de H:L era una señal temprana de que la extensión de bosque se convertiría en un pronosticador importante de la ocupación. También muestreamos a las aves en 43 sitios adicionales para determinar si la ocupación actual podría pronosticarse mejor con el contexto del paisaje en una escala mayor, relevante para los movimientos de dispersión. En los 42 sitios originales, los índices de H:L y las extirpaciones no estuvieron relacionadas, aunque sólo cuatro extirpaciones fueron observadas. La extensión de bosque dentro de 500 m fue entonces un pronosticador confiable de la ocupación. Si se consideran en conjunto, estos resultados proporcionan evidencias mixtas sobre si los patrones de las condiciones individuales pueden revelar relaciones de hábitat que se vuelven evidentes conforme ocurren los cambios locales en la ocupación pero que no son revelados por un solo panorama de la distribución de la especie. En todos los 85 sitios, la extensión de bosque a escalas relevantes para la dispersión (5 km) no estuvo relacionada con la presencia. Recomendamos que las acciones de conservación se enfoquen en regenerar las áreas de hábitat suficientemente grandes para mantener territorios para estas aves en lugar de incrementar la conectividad dentro del paisaje.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Habitat loss and fragmentation are causing widespread population declines, but identifying how and when to intervene remains challenging. Predicting where extirpations are likely to occur and implementing management actions before losses result may be more cost-effective than trying to reestablish lost populations. Early indicators of pressure on populations could be used to make such predictions. Previous work conducted in 2009 and 2010 identified that the presence of Eastern Yellow Robins (Eopsaltria australis) in 42 sites in a fragmented region of eastern Australia was unrelated to woodland extent within 500 m of a site, but the robins’ heterophil:lymphocyte (H:L) ratios (an indicator of chronic stress) were elevated at sites with low levels of surrounding woodland. We resurveyed these 42 sites in 2013 and 2014 for robin presence to determine whether the H:L ratios obtained in 2009 and 2010 predicted the locations of extirpations and whether the previous pattern in H:L ratios was an early sign that woodland extent would become an important predictor of occupancy. We also surveyed for robins at 43 additional sites to determine whether current occupancy could be better predicted by landscape context at a larger scale, relevant to dispersal movements. At the original 42 sites, H:L ratios and extirpations were not related, although only 4 extirpations were observed. Woodland extent within 500 m had become a strong predictor of occupancy. Taken together, these results provide mixed evidence as to whether patterns of individual condition can reveal habitat relationships that become evident as local shifts in occupancy occur but that are not revealed by a single snapshot of species distribution. Across all 85 sites, woodland extent at scales relevant to dispersal (5 km) was not related to occurrence. We recommend that conservation actions focus on regenerating areas of habitat large enough to support robin territories rather than increasing connectivity within the landscape.


Utilización de las Medidas Individuales de Condición para Pronosticar La Importancia a Largo Plazo de la Extensión del Hábitat para la Permanencia Poblacional

Resumen
La pérdida y fragmentación de los hábitats están causando declinaciones poblacionales extendidas, pero identificar cómo y cuándo intervenir todavía es un reto. Pronosticar en dónde es probable que ocurran las extirpaciones e implementar acciones de manejo previas a las pérdidas puede ser más rentable que restablecer las poblaciones perdidas. Los indicadores tempranos de presión sobre las poblaciones podrían utilizarse para realizar dichos pronósticos. Trabajos previos hechos en 2009 y en 2010 identificaron que la presencia de Eopsaltria australis en 42 sitios de una región fragmentada del este de Australia no estaba relacionada con la extensión de bosque dentro de 500 m del sitio, pero que el índice del heterofil:linfocito (H:L) de las aves era elevado en sitios con niveles bajos de bosque circundante. Volvimos a muestrear la presencia de las aves en estos 42 sitios en 2013 y en 2014 para determinar si los índices de H:L obtenidos en 2009 y en 2010 pronosticaban la ubicación de las extirpaciones y si el patrón previo en los índices de H:L era una señal temprana de que la extensión de bosque se convertiría en un pronosticador importante de la ocupación. También muestreamos a las aves en 43 sitios adicionales para determinar si la ocupación actual podría pronosticarse mejor con el contexto del paisaje en una escala mayor, relevante para los movimientos de dispersión. En los 42 sitios originales, los índices de H:L y las extirpaciones no estuvieron relacionadas, aunque sólo cuatro extirpaciones fueron observadas. La extensión de bosque dentro de 500 m fue entonces un pronosticador confiable de la ocupación. Si se consideran en conjunto, estos resultados proporcionan evidencias mixtas sobre si los patrones de las condiciones individuales pueden revelar relaciones de hábitat que se vuelven evidentes conforme ocurren los cambios locales en la ocupación pero que no son revelados por un solo panorama de la distribución de la especie. En todos los 85 sitios, la extensión de bosque a escalas relevantes para la dispersión (5 km) no estuvo relacionada con la presencia. Recomendamos que las acciones de conservación se enfoquen en regenerar las áreas de hábitat suficientemente grandes para mantener territorios para estas aves en lugar de incrementar la conectividad dentro del paisaje.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12905" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Habitat as a mediator of mesopredator-driven mammal extinction</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12905</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Habitat as a mediator of mesopredator-driven mammal extinction</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter J. McDonald, Catherine E. M. Nano, Simon J. Ward, Alistair Stewart, Chris R. Pavey, Gary W. Luck, Chris R. Dickman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-15T07:21:35.680599-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12905</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12905</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12905</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A prevailing view in dryland systems is that mammals are constrained by the scarcity of fertile soils and primary productivity. An alternative view is that predation is a primary driver of mammal assemblages, especially in Australia, where 2 introduced mesopredators—feral cat <i>(Felis catus)</i> and red fox <i>(Vulpes vulpes)</i>—are responsible for severe declines of dryland mammals. We evaluated productivity and predation as drivers of native mammal assemblage structure in dryland Australia. We used new data from 90 sites to examine the divers of extant mammal species richness and reconstructed historic mammal assemblages to determine proportional loss of mammal species across broad habitat types (landform and vegetation communities). Predation was supported as a major driver of extant mammal richness, but its effect was strongly mediated by habitat. Areas that were rugged or had dense grass cover supported more mammal species than the more productive and topographically simple areas. Twelve species in the critical weight range (CWR) (35–5500 g) that is most vulnerable to mesopredator predation were extirpated from the continent's central region, and the severity of loss of species correlated negatively with ruggedness and positively with productivity. Based on previous studies, we expect that habitat mediates predation from red foxes and feral cats because it affects these species’ densities and foraging efficiency. Large areas of rugged terrain provided vital refuge for Australian dryland mammals, and we predict such areas will support the persistence of CWR species in the face of ongoing mammal declines elsewhere in Australia.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12905-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Hábitat como Mediador de la Extinción Causada por Mesodepredadores</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12905-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Una visión prevalente en los sistemas secos es que los mamíferos están restringidos por la escasez de suelos fértiles y productividad primaria. Una visión alternativa es que la depredación es un conductor primario de los ensamblajes de los mamíferos, especialmente en Australia, en donde dos mesodepredadores introducidos – el gato feral <i>(Felis catus)</i> y el zorro rojo <i>(Vulpes vulpes)</i> – son los responsables de declinaciones graves de los mamíferos desérticos. Evaluamos a la productividad y a la depredación como conductores de la estructura de ensamblaje de mamíferos nativos en los desiertos de Australia. Utilizamos datos nuevos de 90 sitios para examinar a los conductores de la riqueza de especies de mamíferos existentes y reconstruimos los ensamblajes históricos de mamíferos para determinar la pérdida proporcional de las especies de mamíferos a lo largo de los tipos generales de hábitat (accidente geográfico o vegetación). La depredación fue respaldada como el principal conductor de la riqueza de mamíferos existentes, pero su efecto estuvo mediado considerablemente por el hábitat. Las áreas que eran escabrosas o que tenían una cobertura densa de pasto pudieron mantener a más especies de mamíferos que las áreas más productivas o más simples topográficamente. Doce especies en el rango crítico de peso (RCP) (35 – 5500 g) que son más vulnerables a la depredación por mesodepredadores fueron extirpadas de la región central del continente, y la gravedad de la pérdida de especies estuvo correlacionada negativamente con la escabrosidad y positivamente con la productividad. Con base en estudios previos, esperamos que el hábitat medie la depredación por parte de los zorros rojos y los gatos ferales porque afecta a la densidad de estas especies y su eficiencia para buscar comida. Las áreas extensas de terreno escabroso proporcionan refugio vital para los mamíferos desérticos de Australia y pronosticamos que dichas áreas podrán mantener la persistencia de las especies RCP de frente a las declinaciones de mamíferos en otras partes de Australia.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

A prevailing view in dryland systems is that mammals are constrained by the scarcity of fertile soils and primary productivity. An alternative view is that predation is a primary driver of mammal assemblages, especially in Australia, where 2 introduced mesopredators—feral cat (Felis catus) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes)—are responsible for severe declines of dryland mammals. We evaluated productivity and predation as drivers of native mammal assemblage structure in dryland Australia. We used new data from 90 sites to examine the divers of extant mammal species richness and reconstructed historic mammal assemblages to determine proportional loss of mammal species across broad habitat types (landform and vegetation communities). Predation was supported as a major driver of extant mammal richness, but its effect was strongly mediated by habitat. Areas that were rugged or had dense grass cover supported more mammal species than the more productive and topographically simple areas. Twelve species in the critical weight range (CWR) (35–5500 g) that is most vulnerable to mesopredator predation were extirpated from the continent's central region, and the severity of loss of species correlated negatively with ruggedness and positively with productivity. Based on previous studies, we expect that habitat mediates predation from red foxes and feral cats because it affects these species’ densities and foraging efficiency. Large areas of rugged terrain provided vital refuge for Australian dryland mammals, and we predict such areas will support the persistence of CWR species in the face of ongoing mammal declines elsewhere in Australia.


El Hábitat como Mediador de la Extinción Causada por Mesodepredadores

Resumen
Una visión prevalente en los sistemas secos es que los mamíferos están restringidos por la escasez de suelos fértiles y productividad primaria. Una visión alternativa es que la depredación es un conductor primario de los ensamblajes de los mamíferos, especialmente en Australia, en donde dos mesodepredadores introducidos – el gato feral (Felis catus) y el zorro rojo (Vulpes vulpes) – son los responsables de declinaciones graves de los mamíferos desérticos. Evaluamos a la productividad y a la depredación como conductores de la estructura de ensamblaje de mamíferos nativos en los desiertos de Australia. Utilizamos datos nuevos de 90 sitios para examinar a los conductores de la riqueza de especies de mamíferos existentes y reconstruimos los ensamblajes históricos de mamíferos para determinar la pérdida proporcional de las especies de mamíferos a lo largo de los tipos generales de hábitat (accidente geográfico o vegetación). La depredación fue respaldada como el principal conductor de la riqueza de mamíferos existentes, pero su efecto estuvo mediado considerablemente por el hábitat. Las áreas que eran escabrosas o que tenían una cobertura densa de pasto pudieron mantener a más especies de mamíferos que las áreas más productivas o más simples topográficamente. Doce especies en el rango crítico de peso (RCP) (35 – 5500 g) que son más vulnerables a la depredación por mesodepredadores fueron extirpadas de la región central del continente, y la gravedad de la pérdida de especies estuvo correlacionada negativamente con la escabrosidad y positivamente con la productividad. Con base en estudios previos, esperamos que el hábitat medie la depredación por parte de los zorros rojos y los gatos ferales porque afecta a la densidad de estas especies y su eficiencia para buscar comida. Las áreas extensas de terreno escabroso proporcionan refugio vital para los mamíferos desérticos de Australia y pronosticamos que dichas áreas podrán mantener la persistencia de las especies RCP de frente a las declinaciones de mamíferos en otras partes de Australia.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12942" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A critique of the historical-fire-regime concept in conservation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12942</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A critique of the historical-fire-regime concept in conservation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johanna Freeman, Leda Kobziar, Elizabeth White Rose, Wendell Cropper</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-15T07:20:47.354639-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12942</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12942</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12942</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Prescribed fire is widely accepted as a conservation tool because fire is essential to the maintenance of native biodiversity in many terrestrial communities. Approaches to this land-management technique vary greatly among continents, and sharing knowledge internationally can inform application of prescribed fire worldwide. In North America, decisions about how and when to apply prescribed fire are typically based on the historical-fire-regime concept (HFRC), which holds that replicating the pattern of fires ignited by lightning or preindustrial humans best promotes native species in fire-prone regions. The HFRC rests on 3 assumptions: it is possible to infer historical fire regimes accurately; fire-suppressed communities are ecologically degraded; and reinstating historical fire regimes is the best course of action despite the global shift toward novel abiotic and biotic conditions. We examined the underpinnings of these assumptions by conducting a literature review on the use of historical fire regimes to inform the application of prescribed fire. We found that the practice of inferring historical fire regimes for entire regions or ecosystems often entails substantial uncertainty and can yield equivocal results; ecological outcomes of fire suppression are complex and may not equate to degradation, depending on the ecosystem and context; and habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and other modern factors can interact with fire to produce novel and in some cases negative ecological outcomes. It is therefore unlikely that all 3 assumptions will be fully upheld for any landscape in which prescribed fire is being applied. Although the HFRC is a valuable starting point, it should not be viewed as the sole basis for developing prescribed fire programs. Rather, fire prescriptions should also account for other specific, measurable ecological parameters on a case-by-case basis. To best achieve conservation goals, researchers should seek to understand contemporary fire–biota interactions across trophic levels, functional groups, spatial and temporal scales, and management contexts.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12942-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Una Crítica al Concepto de Régimen Histórico de Incendios en la Conservación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12942-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los incendios prescritos están aceptados ampliamente como una herramienta de la conservación pues el fuego es esencial para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad nativa en muchas comunidades terrestres. Las estrategias de esta técnica de manejo de suelos varían enormemente entre continentes y compartir el conocimiento a nivel internacional puede informar a la aplicación de los incendios prescritos en todo el mundo. En América del Norte las decisiones sobre cómo y cuándo aplicar los incendios prescritos están basadas típicamente en el concepto de régimen histórico de incendios (CRHI), el cual sostiene que replicar el patrón de incendios iniciados por relámpagos o humanos pre-industriales promueve de mejor manera a las especies nativas en las regiones propensas a incendios. El CRHI se apoya en tres suposiciones: es posible inferir con certeza los regímenes históricos de incendios; las comunidades contenidas por incendios son degradas ecológicamente; y la reincorporación de los regímenes históricos de incendios es la mejor acción a seguir a pesar del cambio global hacia las condiciones bióticas y abióticas innovadoras. Examinamos los apuntalamientos de estas suposiciones por medio de una revisión a la literatura sobre el uso de regímenes históricos de incendios para informar a la aplicación de incendios prescritos. Encontramos que la práctica de la inferencia de los regímenes históricos de incendios para regiones o ecosistemas enteros implica generalmente una incertidumbre sustancial y puede producir resultados equivocados; los resultados ecológicos de la contención por incendios son complejos y pueden no ser iguales a la degradación, dependiendo del ecosistema y el contexto; y la fragmentación del hábitat, las especies invasoras, y otros factores modernos pueden interactuar con los incendios para producir resultados ecológicos innovadores y, en algunos casos, negativos. Por lo tanto, no es probable que las tres suposiciones se mantengan totalmente para cualquier paisaje en el que los incendios prescritos se estén aplicando. Aunque el CRHI es un punto de inicio valioso, no debe ser visto como el fundamento único para desarrollar programas de incendios prescritos. En su lugar, la prescripción de incendios debería considerar otros parámetros ecológicos medibles y específicos con una base de caso-por-caso. Para conseguir de manera más efectiva los objetivos de conservación, los investigadores deberían buscar entender las interacciones contemporáneas entre los incendios y la biota en todos los niveles tróficos, grupos funcionales, escalas espaciales y temporales, y en contextos de manejo.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Prescribed fire is widely accepted as a conservation tool because fire is essential to the maintenance of native biodiversity in many terrestrial communities. Approaches to this land-management technique vary greatly among continents, and sharing knowledge internationally can inform application of prescribed fire worldwide. In North America, decisions about how and when to apply prescribed fire are typically based on the historical-fire-regime concept (HFRC), which holds that replicating the pattern of fires ignited by lightning or preindustrial humans best promotes native species in fire-prone regions. The HFRC rests on 3 assumptions: it is possible to infer historical fire regimes accurately; fire-suppressed communities are ecologically degraded; and reinstating historical fire regimes is the best course of action despite the global shift toward novel abiotic and biotic conditions. We examined the underpinnings of these assumptions by conducting a literature review on the use of historical fire regimes to inform the application of prescribed fire. We found that the practice of inferring historical fire regimes for entire regions or ecosystems often entails substantial uncertainty and can yield equivocal results; ecological outcomes of fire suppression are complex and may not equate to degradation, depending on the ecosystem and context; and habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and other modern factors can interact with fire to produce novel and in some cases negative ecological outcomes. It is therefore unlikely that all 3 assumptions will be fully upheld for any landscape in which prescribed fire is being applied. Although the HFRC is a valuable starting point, it should not be viewed as the sole basis for developing prescribed fire programs. Rather, fire prescriptions should also account for other specific, measurable ecological parameters on a case-by-case basis. To best achieve conservation goals, researchers should seek to understand contemporary fire–biota interactions across trophic levels, functional groups, spatial and temporal scales, and management contexts.


Una Crítica al Concepto de Régimen Histórico de Incendios en la Conservación

Resumen
Los incendios prescritos están aceptados ampliamente como una herramienta de la conservación pues el fuego es esencial para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad nativa en muchas comunidades terrestres. Las estrategias de esta técnica de manejo de suelos varían enormemente entre continentes y compartir el conocimiento a nivel internacional puede informar a la aplicación de los incendios prescritos en todo el mundo. En América del Norte las decisiones sobre cómo y cuándo aplicar los incendios prescritos están basadas típicamente en el concepto de régimen histórico de incendios (CRHI), el cual sostiene que replicar el patrón de incendios iniciados por relámpagos o humanos pre-industriales promueve de mejor manera a las especies nativas en las regiones propensas a incendios. El CRHI se apoya en tres suposiciones: es posible inferir con certeza los regímenes históricos de incendios; las comunidades contenidas por incendios son degradas ecológicamente; y la reincorporación de los regímenes históricos de incendios es la mejor acción a seguir a pesar del cambio global hacia las condiciones bióticas y abióticas innovadoras. Examinamos los apuntalamientos de estas suposiciones por medio de una revisión a la literatura sobre el uso de regímenes históricos de incendios para informar a la aplicación de incendios prescritos. Encontramos que la práctica de la inferencia de los regímenes históricos de incendios para regiones o ecosistemas enteros implica generalmente una incertidumbre sustancial y puede producir resultados equivocados; los resultados ecológicos de la contención por incendios son complejos y pueden no ser iguales a la degradación, dependiendo del ecosistema y el contexto; y la fragmentación del hábitat, las especies invasoras, y otros factores modernos pueden interactuar con los incendios para producir resultados ecológicos innovadores y, en algunos casos, negativos. Por lo tanto, no es probable que las tres suposiciones se mantengan totalmente para cualquier paisaje en el que los incendios prescritos se estén aplicando. Aunque el CRHI es un punto de inicio valioso, no debe ser visto como el fundamento único para desarrollar programas de incendios prescritos. En su lugar, la prescripción de incendios debería considerar otros parámetros ecológicos medibles y específicos con una base de caso-por-caso. Para conseguir de manera más efectiva los objetivos de conservación, los investigadores deberían buscar entender las interacciones contemporáneas entre los incendios y la biota en todos los niveles tróficos, grupos funcionales, escalas espaciales y temporales, y en contextos de manejo.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12865" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Integrating archaeology and ancient DNA analysis to address invasive species colonization in the Gulf of Alaska</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12865</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Integrating archaeology and ancient DNA analysis to address invasive species colonization in the Gulf of Alaska</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Catherine West, Courtney A. Hofman, Steve Ebbert, John Martin, Sabrina Shirazi, Samantha Dunning, Jesus E. Maldonado</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-15T07:16:04.213946-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12865</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12865</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12865</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The intentional and unintentional movement of plants and animals by humans has transformed ecosystems and landscapes globally. Assessing when and how a species was introduced are central to managing these transformed landscapes, particularly in island environments. In the Gulf of Alaska, there is considerable interest in the history of mammal introductions and rehabilitating Gulf of Alaska island environments by eradicating mammals classified as invasive species. The Arctic ground squirrel <i>(Urocitellus parryii)</i> is of concern because it affects vegetation and seabirds on Gulf of Alaska islands. This animal is assumed to have been introduced by historic settlers; however, ground squirrel remains in the prehistoric archaeological record of Chirikof Island, Alaska, challenge this timeline and suggest they colonized the islands long ago. We used 3 lines of evidence to address this problem: direct radiocarbon dating of archaeological squirrel remains; evidence of prehistoric human use of squirrels; and ancient DNA analysis of dated squirrel remains. Chirikof squirrels dated to at least 2000 years ago, and cut marks on squirrel bones suggested prehistoric use by people. Ancient squirrels also shared a mitochondrial haplotype with modern Chirikof squirrels. These results suggest that squirrels have been on Chirikof longer than previously assumed and that the current population of squirrels is closely related to the ancient population. Thus, it appears ground squirrels are not a recent, human-mediated introduction and may have colonized the island via a natural dispersal event or an ancient human translocation.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12865-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Integración de la Arqueología y el Análisis de ADN Antiguo para Abordar la Colonización de las Especies Invasoras en el Golfo de Alaska</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12865-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El movimiento intencional y no intencional de plantas y animales causado por los humanos ha transformado a ecosistemas y paisajes a nivel mundial. Valorar cuándo y cómo una especie fue introducida es importante para el manejo de estos paisajes transformados, en particular en los ambientes isleños. En el Golfo de Alaska hay un interés considerable por la historia de las introducciones de mamíferos y la rehabilitación de los ambientes isleños del Golfo de Alaska por medio de la erradicación de mamíferos clasificados como especies invasoras. La ardilla terrestre del Ártico <i>(Urocitellus parryii)</i> es de interés porque afecta a la vegetación y las aves marinas en las islas del Golfo de Alaska. Se asume que este animal fue introducido por los colonizadores históricos; sin embargo, los restos de ardillas terrestres en el registro arqueológico prehistórico de la Isla Chirkof, Alaska, cuestionan esta línea del tiempo y sugieren que las ardillas colonizaron la isla hace mucho tiempo. Utilizamos tres líneas de evidencia para abordar este problema: el fechado directo con radiocarbono de los restos arqueológicos de las ardillas, la evidencia del uso de las ardillas por humanos prehistóricos, y el análisis de ADN antiguo de los restos fechados de las ardillas. Las ardillas de Chirkof fueron fechadas a por lo menos 2000 años atrás, y las marcas de cortes en los huesos de las ardillas sugirieron un uso prehistórico por personas. Las ardillas antiguas también compartieron un haplotipo mitocondrial con las ardillas modernas de Chirkof. Estos resultados sugieren que las ardillas han estado en Chirkof mucho más tiempo del que se asumía previamente y que la población actual de ardillas está relacionada cercanamente con la población antigua. Así, parece que las ardillas terrestres no son una introducción reciente mediada por los humanos y podrían haber colonizado la isla por medio de eventos naturales de dispersión o translocación por humanos antiguos.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The intentional and unintentional movement of plants and animals by humans has transformed ecosystems and landscapes globally. Assessing when and how a species was introduced are central to managing these transformed landscapes, particularly in island environments. In the Gulf of Alaska, there is considerable interest in the history of mammal introductions and rehabilitating Gulf of Alaska island environments by eradicating mammals classified as invasive species. The Arctic ground squirrel (Urocitellus parryii) is of concern because it affects vegetation and seabirds on Gulf of Alaska islands. This animal is assumed to have been introduced by historic settlers; however, ground squirrel remains in the prehistoric archaeological record of Chirikof Island, Alaska, challenge this timeline and suggest they colonized the islands long ago. We used 3 lines of evidence to address this problem: direct radiocarbon dating of archaeological squirrel remains; evidence of prehistoric human use of squirrels; and ancient DNA analysis of dated squirrel remains. Chirikof squirrels dated to at least 2000 years ago, and cut marks on squirrel bones suggested prehistoric use by people. Ancient squirrels also shared a mitochondrial haplotype with modern Chirikof squirrels. These results suggest that squirrels have been on Chirikof longer than previously assumed and that the current population of squirrels is closely related to the ancient population. Thus, it appears ground squirrels are not a recent, human-mediated introduction and may have colonized the island via a natural dispersal event or an ancient human translocation.


Integración de la Arqueología y el Análisis de ADN Antiguo para Abordar la Colonización de las Especies Invasoras en el Golfo de Alaska

Resumen
El movimiento intencional y no intencional de plantas y animales causado por los humanos ha transformado a ecosistemas y paisajes a nivel mundial. Valorar cuándo y cómo una especie fue introducida es importante para el manejo de estos paisajes transformados, en particular en los ambientes isleños. En el Golfo de Alaska hay un interés considerable por la historia de las introducciones de mamíferos y la rehabilitación de los ambientes isleños del Golfo de Alaska por medio de la erradicación de mamíferos clasificados como especies invasoras. La ardilla terrestre del Ártico (Urocitellus parryii) es de interés porque afecta a la vegetación y las aves marinas en las islas del Golfo de Alaska. Se asume que este animal fue introducido por los colonizadores históricos; sin embargo, los restos de ardillas terrestres en el registro arqueológico prehistórico de la Isla Chirkof, Alaska, cuestionan esta línea del tiempo y sugieren que las ardillas colonizaron la isla hace mucho tiempo. Utilizamos tres líneas de evidencia para abordar este problema: el fechado directo con radiocarbono de los restos arqueológicos de las ardillas, la evidencia del uso de las ardillas por humanos prehistóricos, y el análisis de ADN antiguo de los restos fechados de las ardillas. Las ardillas de Chirkof fueron fechadas a por lo menos 2000 años atrás, y las marcas de cortes en los huesos de las ardillas sugirieron un uso prehistórico por personas. Las ardillas antiguas también compartieron un haplotipo mitocondrial con las ardillas modernas de Chirkof. Estos resultados sugieren que las ardillas han estado en Chirkof mucho más tiempo del que se asumía previamente y que la población actual de ardillas está relacionada cercanamente con la población antigua. Así, parece que las ardillas terrestres no son una introducción reciente mediada por los humanos y podrían haber colonizado la isla por medio de eventos naturales de dispersión o translocación por humanos antiguos.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12891" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Sustainability and comanagement of subsistence hunting in an indigenous reserve in Guyana</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12891</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sustainability and comanagement of subsistence hunting in an indigenous reserve in Guyana</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher A. Shaffer, Marissa S. Milstein, Charakura Yukuma, Elisha Marawanaru, Phillip Suse</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-15T07:15:49.435352-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12891</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12891</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12891</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Although hunting is a key component of subsistence strategies of many Amazonians, it is also one of the greatest threats to wildlife. Because indigenous reserves comprise over 20% of Amazonia, effective conservation often requires that conservation professionals work closely with indigenous groups to manage resource use. We used hunter-generated harvesting data in spatially explicit biodemographic models to assess the sustainability of subsistence hunting of indigenous Waiwai in Guyana. We collected data through a hunter self-monitoring program, systematic follows of hunters, and semistructured interviews. We used these data to predict future densities of 2 indicator species, spider monkeys (<span class="fixed-roman">Ateles paniscus</span>) and bearded sakis (<span class="fixed-roman">Chiropotes sagulatus</span>), under different scenarios of human population expansion and changing hunting technology. We used encounter rates from transect surveys and hunter catch-per-unit effort (CPUE) to validate model predictions. Paca (<span class="fixed-roman">Cuniculus paca</span>) (198 /year), Currosaw (<span class="fixed-roman">Crax alector</span>) (168), and spider monkey (117) were the most frequently harvested species. Predicted densities of spider monkeys were statistically indistinguishable from empirically derived transect data (Kolmogorov–Smirnov <em>D</em> = 0.67, <em>p</em> = 0.759) and CPUE (<em>D</em> = 0.32, <em>p</em> = 1.000), demonstrating the robustness of model predictions. <span class="fixed-roman">Ateles</span> <span class="fixed-roman">paniscus</span> and <span class="fixed-roman">C. sagulatus</span> were predicted to be extirpated from &lt;13% of the Waiwai reserve in 20 years, even under the most intensive hunting scenarios. Our results suggest Waiwai hunting is currently sustainable, primarily due to their low population density and use of bow and arrow. Continual monitoring is necessary, however, particularly if human population increases are accompanied by a switch to shotgun-only hunting. We suggest that hunter self-monitoring and biodemographic modeling can be used effectively in a comanagement approach in which indigenous parabiologists continuously provide hunting data that is then used to update model parameters and validate model predictions.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12891-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Sustentabilidad de la Cacería de Subsistencia y el Co-manejo en una Reserva Indígena en Guyana</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12891-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Aunque la cacería es un componente clave de las estrategias de subsistencia de muchos habitantes de la Amazonia, también es una de las mayores amenazas para la vida silvestre. Debido a que las reservas indígenas abarcan mas de 20% de la Amazonia, la conservación efectiva a menudo requiere que los profesionales de la conservación trabajen cercanamente con los grupos indígenas para gestionar el uso de los recursos. Utilizamos datos de capturas generados por cazadores en modelo biodemográfico espacialmente explícito para evaluar la sustentabilidad de la cacería de subsistencia de indígenas Waiwai en Guyana. Recabamos datos mediante un programa de auto monitoreo de cazadores, seguimiento sistemático de cazadores y entrevistas semiestructuradas. Utilizamos estos datos para predecir las densidades futuras de 2 especies indicadoras, mono araña (<span class="fixed-roman">Ateles paniscus</span>) y sakis (<span class="fixed-roman">Chiropotes sagulatus</span>), bajo diferentes escenarios de expansión de la población humana y cambios en la tecnología de caza. Usamos tasas de encuentro en transectos de muestreo y de captura por cazador por unidad de esfuerzo (CCUE) para validar las predicciones de los modelos. Las especies cazadas más frecuentemente fueron: paca (<span class="fixed-roman">Cuniculus paca</span>) (198/año), pajuil (<span class="fixed-roman">Crax alector</span>) (168) y mono araña (117). Las densidades pronosticadas de mono araña fueron indistinguibles estadísticamente de los datos derivados empíricamente de los transectos (Kolmorov-Smirnov <em>D</em> = 0.67, <em>p</em> = 0.759) y CCUE (<em>D</em> = 0.32, <em>p</em> = 1.000), lo cual demostró la robustez de las predicciones de los modelos. Se pronosticó que <span class="fixed-roman">A. paniscus y</span> <span class="fixed-roman">C. sagulatus</span> serían extirpados de &lt;13% de la Reserva Waiwai en veinte años, aun bajo los escenarios de cacería más intensa. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la caza de los Waiwai es sustentable actualmente, principalmente debido a su densidad poblacional baja y al uso de arco y flechas. Es necesario el monitoreo continuo, particularmente si los incrementos de la población humana son acompañadas por el cambio a solo utilizar escopetas para la cacería. Sugerimos que nuestros métodos de obtención de datos y modelo pueden ser utilizados efectivamente en un enfoque de co-manejo en el que parabiólogos indígenas proporcionen datos de cacería continuamente para que luego sean utilizados para actualizar los parámetros del modelo y validar las predicciones.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Although hunting is a key component of subsistence strategies of many Amazonians, it is also one of the greatest threats to wildlife. Because indigenous reserves comprise over 20% of Amazonia, effective conservation often requires that conservation professionals work closely with indigenous groups to manage resource use. We used hunter-generated harvesting data in spatially explicit biodemographic models to assess the sustainability of subsistence hunting of indigenous Waiwai in Guyana. We collected data through a hunter self-monitoring program, systematic follows of hunters, and semistructured interviews. We used these data to predict future densities of 2 indicator species, spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus) and bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus), under different scenarios of human population expansion and changing hunting technology. We used encounter rates from transect surveys and hunter catch-per-unit effort (CPUE) to validate model predictions. Paca (Cuniculus paca) (198 /year), Currosaw (Crax alector) (168), and spider monkey (117) were the most frequently harvested species. Predicted densities of spider monkeys were statistically indistinguishable from empirically derived transect data (Kolmogorov–Smirnov D = 0.67, p = 0.759) and CPUE (D = 0.32, p = 1.000), demonstrating the robustness of model predictions. Ateles paniscus and C. sagulatus were predicted to be extirpated from &lt;13% of the Waiwai reserve in 20 years, even under the most intensive hunting scenarios. Our results suggest Waiwai hunting is currently sustainable, primarily due to their low population density and use of bow and arrow. Continual monitoring is necessary, however, particularly if human population increases are accompanied by a switch to shotgun-only hunting. We suggest that hunter self-monitoring and biodemographic modeling can be used effectively in a comanagement approach in which indigenous parabiologists continuously provide hunting data that is then used to update model parameters and validate model predictions.


Sustentabilidad de la Cacería de Subsistencia y el Co-manejo en una Reserva Indígena en Guyana

Resumen
Aunque la cacería es un componente clave de las estrategias de subsistencia de muchos habitantes de la Amazonia, también es una de las mayores amenazas para la vida silvestre. Debido a que las reservas indígenas abarcan mas de 20% de la Amazonia, la conservación efectiva a menudo requiere que los profesionales de la conservación trabajen cercanamente con los grupos indígenas para gestionar el uso de los recursos. Utilizamos datos de capturas generados por cazadores en modelo biodemográfico espacialmente explícito para evaluar la sustentabilidad de la cacería de subsistencia de indígenas Waiwai en Guyana. Recabamos datos mediante un programa de auto monitoreo de cazadores, seguimiento sistemático de cazadores y entrevistas semiestructuradas. Utilizamos estos datos para predecir las densidades futuras de 2 especies indicadoras, mono araña (Ateles paniscus) y sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus), bajo diferentes escenarios de expansión de la población humana y cambios en la tecnología de caza. Usamos tasas de encuentro en transectos de muestreo y de captura por cazador por unidad de esfuerzo (CCUE) para validar las predicciones de los modelos. Las especies cazadas más frecuentemente fueron: paca (Cuniculus paca) (198/año), pajuil (Crax alector) (168) y mono araña (117). Las densidades pronosticadas de mono araña fueron indistinguibles estadísticamente de los datos derivados empíricamente de los transectos (Kolmorov-Smirnov D = 0.67, p = 0.759) y CCUE (D = 0.32, p = 1.000), lo cual demostró la robustez de las predicciones de los modelos. Se pronosticó que A. paniscus y C. sagulatus serían extirpados de &lt;13% de la Reserva Waiwai en veinte años, aun bajo los escenarios de cacería más intensa. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la caza de los Waiwai es sustentable actualmente, principalmente debido a su densidad poblacional baja y al uso de arco y flechas. Es necesario el monitoreo continuo, particularmente si los incrementos de la población humana son acompañadas por el cambio a solo utilizar escopetas para la cacería. Sugerimos que nuestros métodos de obtención de datos y modelo pueden ser utilizados efectivamente en un enfoque de co-manejo en el que parabiólogos indígenas proporcionen datos de cacería continuamente para que luego sean utilizados para actualizar los parámetros del modelo y validar las predicciones.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12893" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color signaling</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12893</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color signaling</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathieu Troïanowski, Nathalie Mondy, Adeline Dumet, Caroline Arcanjo, Thierry Lengagne</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-11T11:14:50.705162-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12893</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12893</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12893</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>During the last decade, many studies have focused on the detrimental effects of noise pollution on acoustic communication. Surprisingly, although it is known that noise exposure strongly influences health in humans, studies on wildlife remain scarce. In order to gain insight into the consequences of traffic noise exposure, we experimentally manipulated traffic noise exposure as well as the endocrine status of animals to investigate physiological and phenotypic consequences of noise pollution in an anuran species. We showed that noise exposure increased stress hormone level and induced an immunosuppressive effect. In addition, both traffic noise exposure and stress hormone application negatively impacted <i>H. arborea</i> vocal sac coloration. Moreover, our results suggest profound changes in sexual selection processes because the best quality males with initial attractive vocal sac coloration were the most impacted by noise. Hence, our study suggests that the recent increases in anthropogenic noise worldwide might affect a broader range of animal species than previously thought, because of alteration of visual signals and immunity. Generalizing these results to other taxa is crucial for the conservation of biodiversity in an increasingly noisy world.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12893-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Efectos del Ruido del Tráfico sobre los Niveles de Estrés, Inmunidad y Señalización por Colores de las Ranas Arborícolas</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12893-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Durante la última década, muchos estudios se han enfocado en los efectos nocivos de la contaminación sonora sobre la comunicación acústica. Sorprendentemente, aunque se sabe que la exposición al sonido influye considerablemente sobre la salud humana, los estudios sobre la vida silvestre todavía son escasos. Para poder entender las consecuencias de la exposición al ruido del tráfico, manipulamos de manera experimental la exposición al ruido del tráfico así como el estado endocrino de algunos animales para investigar las consecuencias fisiológicas y fenotípicas de la contaminación sonora en una especie de anuro. Demostramos que la exposición al ruido incrementó el nivel de la hormona del estrés e indujo un efecto inmunorepresor. Además, tanto la exposición al ruido del tráfico y la aplicación de la hormona del estrés impactaron negativamente a la coloración del saco vocal de <i>H. arborea.</i> Sumado a esto, nuestros resultados sugieren cambios profundos en los procesos de selección sexual porque los machos de mejor calidad con la coloración inicial más atractiva del saco vocal fueron los más impactados por el ruido. Por lo tanto, nuestro estudio sugiere que los incrementos recientes en el ruido antropogénico a nivel mundial pueden afectar a una gama más extensa de especies animales de lo que se pensaba previamente debido a la alteración de las señales visuales y la inmunidad. Generalizar estos resultados para otros taxones es crucial para la conservación de la biodiversidad en un mundo cada vez más ruidoso.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

During the last decade, many studies have focused on the detrimental effects of noise pollution on acoustic communication. Surprisingly, although it is known that noise exposure strongly influences health in humans, studies on wildlife remain scarce. In order to gain insight into the consequences of traffic noise exposure, we experimentally manipulated traffic noise exposure as well as the endocrine status of animals to investigate physiological and phenotypic consequences of noise pollution in an anuran species. We showed that noise exposure increased stress hormone level and induced an immunosuppressive effect. In addition, both traffic noise exposure and stress hormone application negatively impacted H. arborea vocal sac coloration. Moreover, our results suggest profound changes in sexual selection processes because the best quality males with initial attractive vocal sac coloration were the most impacted by noise. Hence, our study suggests that the recent increases in anthropogenic noise worldwide might affect a broader range of animal species than previously thought, because of alteration of visual signals and immunity. Generalizing these results to other taxa is crucial for the conservation of biodiversity in an increasingly noisy world.


Efectos del Ruido del Tráfico sobre los Niveles de Estrés, Inmunidad y Señalización por Colores de las Ranas Arborícolas

Resumen
Durante la última década, muchos estudios se han enfocado en los efectos nocivos de la contaminación sonora sobre la comunicación acústica. Sorprendentemente, aunque se sabe que la exposición al sonido influye considerablemente sobre la salud humana, los estudios sobre la vida silvestre todavía son escasos. Para poder entender las consecuencias de la exposición al ruido del tráfico, manipulamos de manera experimental la exposición al ruido del tráfico así como el estado endocrino de algunos animales para investigar las consecuencias fisiológicas y fenotípicas de la contaminación sonora en una especie de anuro. Demostramos que la exposición al ruido incrementó el nivel de la hormona del estrés e indujo un efecto inmunorepresor. Además, tanto la exposición al ruido del tráfico y la aplicación de la hormona del estrés impactaron negativamente a la coloración del saco vocal de H. arborea. Sumado a esto, nuestros resultados sugieren cambios profundos en los procesos de selección sexual porque los machos de mejor calidad con la coloración inicial más atractiva del saco vocal fueron los más impactados por el ruido. Por lo tanto, nuestro estudio sugiere que los incrementos recientes en el ruido antropogénico a nivel mundial pueden afectar a una gama más extensa de especies animales de lo que se pensaba previamente debido a la alteración de las señales visuales y la inmunidad. Generalizar estos resultados para otros taxones es crucial para la conservación de la biodiversidad en un mundo cada vez más ruidoso.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12945" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>One for the expert, and a better one for the layperson</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12945</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">One for the expert, and a better one for the layperson</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabor Pozsgai</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-11T11:14:46.791396-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12945</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12945</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12945</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12888" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12888</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Demian A. Willette, Sara E. Simmonds, Samantha H. Cheng, Sofia Esteves, Tonya L. Kane, Hayley Nuetzel, Nicholas Pilaud, Rita Rachmawati, Paul H. Barber</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-10T04:50:25.961369-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12888</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12888</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12888</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Seafood mislabeling is common in both domestic and international markets. Studies on seafood fraud often report high rates of mislabeling (e.g., &gt;70%), but these studies have been limited to a single sampling year, which means it is difficult to assess the impact of stricter governmental truth-in-labeling regulations. We used DNA barcoding to assess seafood labeling in 26 sushi restaurants in Los Angeles over 4 years. Seafood from 3 high-end grocery stores were also sampled (<i>n</i> = 16) in 2014. We ordered 9 common sushi fish from menus, preserved tissue samples in 95% ethanol, extracted the genomic DNA, amplified and sequenced a portion of the mtDNA COI gene, and identified the resulting sequence to known fish sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information nucleotide database. We compared DNA results with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) list of acceptable market names and retail names. We considered sushi-sample labels that were inconsistent with FDA names mislabeled. Sushi restaurants had a consistently high percentage of mislabeling (47%; 151 of 323) from 2012 to 2015, yet mislabeling was not homogenous across species. Halibut, red snapper, yellowfin tuna, and yellowtail had consistently high (&lt;77%) occurrences of mislabeling on menus, whereas mislabeling of salmon and mackerel were typically low (&gt;15%). All sampled sushi restaurants had at least one case of mislabeling. Mislabeling of sushi-grade fish from high-end grocery stores was also identified in red snapper, yellowfin tuna, and yellowtail, but at a slightly lower frequency (42%) than sushi restaurants. Despite increased regulatory measures and media attention, we found seafood mislabeling continues to be prevalent.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12888-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Utilización del Código de Barras de ADN para Rastrear Pescados Mal Etiquetados en Restaurantes de Los Ángeles</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12888-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La mala etiquetación de pescados es común tanto en los mercados domésticos como en los internacionales. Los estudios sobre el fraude de pescados generalmente reportan tasas altas de mala etiquetación (p. ej.: &gt;70 %), pero estos estudios han sido limitados a un sólo muestreo al año, lo que significa que es complicado evaluar el impacto de regulaciones gubernamentales más estrictas sobre las etiquetas verídicas. Utilizamos el código de barras de ADN para evaluar el etiquetado de pescados en 26 restaurantes de sushi en Los Ángeles durante cuatro años. Los pescados de tres supermercados lujosos también fueron muestreados (<i>n</i> = 16) en el 2014. Ordenamos nueve pescados comunes en el sushi de los menús, preservamos las muestras de tejido en etanol al 95 %, extrajimos el ADN genómico, amplificamos y secuenciamos la porción del gen COI del ADNmt, e identificamos la secuencia resultante a partir de secuencias de peces de la base de datos de nucleótidos del Centro Nacional para la Información Biotecnológica. Comparamos los resultados de ADN con la lista de nombres aceptables para el mercado y de venta al menudeo de la Administración Estadunidense de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA, en inglés). Consideramos como mal etiquetadas a las muestras de sushi que no fueron consistentes con los nombres de la FDA. Los restaurantes de sushi tuvieron constantemente un porcentaje alto de mala etiquetación (47 %; 151 de 323) de 2012 a 2015, sin embargo, la mala etiquetación no fue homogénea entre las especies. El hipogloso, el huachinango, el atún de aleta amarilla y el jurel tuvieron ocurrencias altas (&lt;77 %) de mala etiquetación en los menús, mientras que la mala etiquetación del salmón y la caballa fue típicamente baja (&gt;15 %). Todos los restaurantes de sushi muestreados tuvieron por lo menos un caso de mala etiquetación. La mala etiquetación de pescado con calidad para sushi de los supermercados lujosos también fue identificada para el huachinango, el atún de aleta amarilla y el jurel, pero a una frecuencia un poco menor (42 %) que en los restaurantes de sushi. A pesar del incremento en las medidas regulatorias y en la atención de los medios, encontramos que la mala etiquetación de los pescados todavía es prevalente.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Seafood mislabeling is common in both domestic and international markets. Studies on seafood fraud often report high rates of mislabeling (e.g., &gt;70%), but these studies have been limited to a single sampling year, which means it is difficult to assess the impact of stricter governmental truth-in-labeling regulations. We used DNA barcoding to assess seafood labeling in 26 sushi restaurants in Los Angeles over 4 years. Seafood from 3 high-end grocery stores were also sampled (n = 16) in 2014. We ordered 9 common sushi fish from menus, preserved tissue samples in 95% ethanol, extracted the genomic DNA, amplified and sequenced a portion of the mtDNA COI gene, and identified the resulting sequence to known fish sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information nucleotide database. We compared DNA results with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) list of acceptable market names and retail names. We considered sushi-sample labels that were inconsistent with FDA names mislabeled. Sushi restaurants had a consistently high percentage of mislabeling (47%; 151 of 323) from 2012 to 2015, yet mislabeling was not homogenous across species. Halibut, red snapper, yellowfin tuna, and yellowtail had consistently high (&lt;77%) occurrences of mislabeling on menus, whereas mislabeling of salmon and mackerel were typically low (&gt;15%). All sampled sushi restaurants had at least one case of mislabeling. Mislabeling of sushi-grade fish from high-end grocery stores was also identified in red snapper, yellowfin tuna, and yellowtail, but at a slightly lower frequency (42%) than sushi restaurants. Despite increased regulatory measures and media attention, we found seafood mislabeling continues to be prevalent.


Utilización del Código de Barras de ADN para Rastrear Pescados Mal Etiquetados en Restaurantes de Los Ángeles

Resumen
La mala etiquetación de pescados es común tanto en los mercados domésticos como en los internacionales. Los estudios sobre el fraude de pescados generalmente reportan tasas altas de mala etiquetación (p. ej.: &gt;70 %), pero estos estudios han sido limitados a un sólo muestreo al año, lo que significa que es complicado evaluar el impacto de regulaciones gubernamentales más estrictas sobre las etiquetas verídicas. Utilizamos el código de barras de ADN para evaluar el etiquetado de pescados en 26 restaurantes de sushi en Los Ángeles durante cuatro años. Los pescados de tres supermercados lujosos también fueron muestreados (n = 16) en el 2014. Ordenamos nueve pescados comunes en el sushi de los menús, preservamos las muestras de tejido en etanol al 95 %, extrajimos el ADN genómico, amplificamos y secuenciamos la porción del gen COI del ADNmt, e identificamos la secuencia resultante a partir de secuencias de peces de la base de datos de nucleótidos del Centro Nacional para la Información Biotecnológica. Comparamos los resultados de ADN con la lista de nombres aceptables para el mercado y de venta al menudeo de la Administración Estadunidense de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA, en inglés). Consideramos como mal etiquetadas a las muestras de sushi que no fueron consistentes con los nombres de la FDA. Los restaurantes de sushi tuvieron constantemente un porcentaje alto de mala etiquetación (47 %; 151 de 323) de 2012 a 2015, sin embargo, la mala etiquetación no fue homogénea entre las especies. El hipogloso, el huachinango, el atún de aleta amarilla y el jurel tuvieron ocurrencias altas (&lt;77 %) de mala etiquetación en los menús, mientras que la mala etiquetación del salmón y la caballa fue típicamente baja (&gt;15 %). Todos los restaurantes de sushi muestreados tuvieron por lo menos un caso de mala etiquetación. La mala etiquetación de pescado con calidad para sushi de los supermercados lujosos también fue identificada para el huachinango, el atún de aleta amarilla y el jurel, pero a una frecuencia un poco menor (42 %) que en los restaurantes de sushi. A pesar del incremento en las medidas regulatorias y en la atención de los medios, encontramos que la mala etiquetación de los pescados todavía es prevalente.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12892" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Level of environmental threat posed by horticultural trade in Cactaceae</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12892</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Level of environmental threat posed by horticultural trade in Cactaceae</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ana Novoa, Johannes J. Roux, David M. Richardson, John R.U. Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-04T07:45:51.900609-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12892</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12892</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12892</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Ornamental horticulture has been identified as an important threat to plant biodiversity and is a major pathway for plant invasions worldwide. In this context, the family Cactaceae is particularly challenging because it is considered the fifth most threatened large taxonomic group in the world; several species are among the most widespread and damaging invasive species; and Cactaceae is one of the most popular horticultural plant groups. Based on the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna and the 11 largest online auction sites selling cacti, we documented the international cactus trade. To provide an in-depth look at the dynamics of the industry, we surveyed the businesses involved in the cactus trade in South Africa (a hotspot of cactus trade and invasions). We purchased seeds of every available species and used DNA barcoding to identify species to the genus level. Although &lt;20% of this trade involved threatened species and &lt;3% involved known invasive species, many species were identified by a common name. However, only 0.02% of the globally traded cacti were collected from wild populations. Despite a large commercial network, all South African imports (of which 15% and 1.5% were of species listed as threatened and invasive, respectively) came from the same source. With DNA barcoding, we identified 24% of the species to genus level. Based on our results, we believe that if trade restrictions are placed on the small proportion of cacti that are invasive and there is no major increase in harvesting of native populations, then the commercial trade in cactus poses a negligible environmental threat. However, there are currently no effective methods for easily identifying which cacti are traded, and both the illicit harvesting of cacti from the wild and the informal trade in invasive taxa pose on-going conservation challenges.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12892-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Nivel de Amenaza Ambiental que Representa el Mercado Horticultor de Cactáceas</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12892-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La horticultura ornamental ha sido identificada como una amenaza importante para la diversidad de plantas y la principal vía de introducción de plantas invasoras a nivel mundial. En este contexto, la familia Cactaceae es particularmente complicada ya que está considerada como el quinto grupo taxonómico más amenazado en el mundo; varias especies en la familia se encuentran entre las especies invasoras más dañinas; y esta familia es uno de los grupos botánicos más populares en la horticultura. En este estudio, documentamos el mercado internacional de cactus, basándonos en la Convención sobre el Mercado Internacional de Especies en Peligro de Flora y Fauna Silvestre y en los once sitios en línea más grandes dedicados a la venta de cactus. Para proporcionar una mirada profunda a las dinámicas de la industria, realizamos censos sobre los negocios involucrados en el mercado de cactus en Sudáfrica (un punto caliente del mercado e invasiones de cactus). Compramos semillas de cada especie disponible y utilizamos el código de barras del ADN para identificar a las especies hasta el nivel de género. Aunque &lt; 20% de este mercado involucra a especies amenazadas y &lt; 3% involucra a especies invasoras conocidas, muchas especies fueron identificadas por un nombre común. Sin embargo, sólo el 0.02% de los cactus vendidos a nivel global fueron recolectados de poblaciones silvestres. A pesar de una gran red comercial, todas las importaciones sudafricanas (de las cuales el 15% y el 1.5% fueron especies enlistadas como amenazadas e invasoras, respectivamente) provinieron de un misma fuente. Con el código de barras del ADN, identificamos a 24% de las especies hasta el nivel de género. Con base en nuestros resultados, creemos que si las restricciones del mercado se colocan sobre la pequeña proporción de cactus que son invasores y no hay un mayor incremento en la cosecha de poblaciones nativas, entonces el mercado comercial de cactus plantea una amenaza ambiental trivial. Sin embargo, actualmente no hay métodos efectivos para identificar fácilmente cuáles cactus son vendidos, y tanto la cosecha ilícita de cactus silvestres y el mercado informal de taxones invasores presentan retos continuos para la conservación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Ornamental horticulture has been identified as an important threat to plant biodiversity and is a major pathway for plant invasions worldwide. In this context, the family Cactaceae is particularly challenging because it is considered the fifth most threatened large taxonomic group in the world; several species are among the most widespread and damaging invasive species; and Cactaceae is one of the most popular horticultural plant groups. Based on the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna and the 11 largest online auction sites selling cacti, we documented the international cactus trade. To provide an in-depth look at the dynamics of the industry, we surveyed the businesses involved in the cactus trade in South Africa (a hotspot of cactus trade and invasions). We purchased seeds of every available species and used DNA barcoding to identify species to the genus level. Although &lt;20% of this trade involved threatened species and &lt;3% involved known invasive species, many species were identified by a common name. However, only 0.02% of the globally traded cacti were collected from wild populations. Despite a large commercial network, all South African imports (of which 15% and 1.5% were of species listed as threatened and invasive, respectively) came from the same source. With DNA barcoding, we identified 24% of the species to genus level. Based on our results, we believe that if trade restrictions are placed on the small proportion of cacti that are invasive and there is no major increase in harvesting of native populations, then the commercial trade in cactus poses a negligible environmental threat. However, there are currently no effective methods for easily identifying which cacti are traded, and both the illicit harvesting of cacti from the wild and the informal trade in invasive taxa pose on-going conservation challenges.


El Nivel de Amenaza Ambiental que Representa el Mercado Horticultor de Cactáceas

Resumen
La horticultura ornamental ha sido identificada como una amenaza importante para la diversidad de plantas y la principal vía de introducción de plantas invasoras a nivel mundial. En este contexto, la familia Cactaceae es particularmente complicada ya que está considerada como el quinto grupo taxonómico más amenazado en el mundo; varias especies en la familia se encuentran entre las especies invasoras más dañinas; y esta familia es uno de los grupos botánicos más populares en la horticultura. En este estudio, documentamos el mercado internacional de cactus, basándonos en la Convención sobre el Mercado Internacional de Especies en Peligro de Flora y Fauna Silvestre y en los once sitios en línea más grandes dedicados a la venta de cactus. Para proporcionar una mirada profunda a las dinámicas de la industria, realizamos censos sobre los negocios involucrados en el mercado de cactus en Sudáfrica (un punto caliente del mercado e invasiones de cactus). Compramos semillas de cada especie disponible y utilizamos el código de barras del ADN para identificar a las especies hasta el nivel de género. Aunque &lt; 20% de este mercado involucra a especies amenazadas y &lt; 3% involucra a especies invasoras conocidas, muchas especies fueron identificadas por un nombre común. Sin embargo, sólo el 0.02% de los cactus vendidos a nivel global fueron recolectados de poblaciones silvestres. A pesar de una gran red comercial, todas las importaciones sudafricanas (de las cuales el 15% y el 1.5% fueron especies enlistadas como amenazadas e invasoras, respectivamente) provinieron de un misma fuente. Con el código de barras del ADN, identificamos a 24% de las especies hasta el nivel de género. Con base en nuestros resultados, creemos que si las restricciones del mercado se colocan sobre la pequeña proporción de cactus que son invasores y no hay un mayor incremento en la cosecha de poblaciones nativas, entonces el mercado comercial de cactus plantea una amenaza ambiental trivial. Sin embargo, actualmente no hay métodos efectivos para identificar fácilmente cuáles cactus son vendidos, y tanto la cosecha ilícita de cactus silvestres y el mercado informal de taxones invasores presentan retos continuos para la conservación.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12899" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The importance of incorporating functional habitats into conservation planning for highly mobile species in dynamic systems</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12899</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The importance of incorporating functional habitats into conservation planning for highly mobile species in dynamic systems</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew H. Webb, Aleks Terauds, Ayesha Tulloch, Phil Bell, Dejan Stojanovic, Robert Heinsohn</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-04T07:45:47.734196-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12899</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12899</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12899</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The distribution of mobile species in dynamic systems can vary greatly over time and space. Estimating their population size and geographic range can be problematic and affect the accuracy of conservation assessments. Scarce data on mobile species and the resources they need can also limit the type of analytical approaches available to derive such estimates. We quantified change in availability and use of key ecological resources required for breeding for a critically endangered nomadic habitat specialist, the Swift Parrot (<i>Lathamus discolor</i>). We compared estimates of occupied habitat derived from dynamic presence-background (i.e., presence-only data) climatic models with estimates derived from dynamic occupancy models that included a direct measure of food availability. We then compared estimates that incorporate fine-resolution spatial data on the availability of key ecological resources (i.e., functional habitats) with more common approaches that focus on broader climatic suitability or vegetation cover (due to the absence of fine-resolution data). The occupancy models produced significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) smaller (up to an order of magnitude) and more spatially discrete estimates of the total occupied area than climate-based models. The spatial location and extent of the total area occupied with the occupancy models was highly variable between years (131 and 1498 km<sup>2</sup>). Estimates accounting for the area of functional habitats were significantly smaller (2–58% [SD 16]) than estimates based only on the total area occupied. An increase or decrease in the area of one functional habitat (foraging or nesting) did not necessarily correspond to an increase or decrease in the other. Thus, an increase in the extent of occupied area may not equate to improved habitat quality or function. We argue these patterns are typical for mobile resource specialists but often go unnoticed because of limited data over relevant spatial and temporal scales and lack of spatial data on the availability of key resources. Understanding changes in the relative availability of functional habitats is crucial to informing conservation planning and accurately assessing extinction risk for mobile resource specialists.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12899-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>La Importancia de la Incorporación de los Hábitats Funcionales dentro de la Planeación de la Conservación para las Especies Altamente Móviles en Sistemas Dinámicos</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12899-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La distribución de las especies móviles en los sistemas dinámicos puede variar enormemente con el tiempo y el espacio. Estimar el tamaño de la población y la extensión geográfica puede ser problemático y afecta la certeza de las valoraciones de conservación. Los datos escasos sobre las especies móviles y los recursos que necesitan también pueden limitar el tipo de estrategias analíticas disponibles para derivar dichos estimados. Cuantificamos el cambio en la disponibilidad y el uso de los recursos ecológicos clave requeridos para la reproducción en un especialista nómada y en peligro de extinción crítico: el periquito migrador (<i>Lathamus discolor</i>). Comparamos los estimados del hábitat ocupado derivados de los modelos climáticos dinámicos de presencia-segundo plano (es decir, datos de sólo-presencia) con los estimados derivados de los modelos de ocupación dinámica que incluyeron una medida directa de la disponibilidad de alimento. Después comparamos los estimados que incorporan datos espaciales de alta resolución sobre la disponibilidad de recursos ecológicos clave (es decir, los hábitats funcionales) con estrategias más comunes que se enfocan en una idoneidad climática más general o en la cobertura vegetal (debido a la ausencia de datos de alta resolución). Los modelos de ocupación produjeron estimados más pequeños significativamente (<i>p</i>&lt;0.001) y más discretos espacialmente del área total ocupada que los modelos con base climática. La ubicación espacial y la extensión del área ocupada total fueron altamente variables entre años (131-1498 km<sup>2</sup>) con los modelos de ocupación. Los estimados que representan el área de los hábitats funcionales fueron más pequeños significativamente (2–58% [DS 16]) que los estimados basados solamente en el área total ocupada. Un incremento o disminución en el área de un hábitat funcional (búsqueda de alimento o anidación) no correspondió necesariamente con un incremento o disminución en el otro. Así, un incremento en la extensión del área ocupada puede no ser igual a un incremento en la función o calidad del hábitat. Argumentamos que estos patrones son típicos para los especialistas en recursos móviles pero son ignorados comúnmente debido a los datos limitados sobre las escalas espaciales y temporales relevantes y a la falta de datos espaciales sobre la disponibilidad de recursos clave. Entender los cambios en la disponibilidad relativa de los hábitats funcionales es crucial para informar a la planeación de la conservación y valorar con certeza el riesgo de extinción de los especialistas en recursos móviles.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The distribution of mobile species in dynamic systems can vary greatly over time and space. Estimating their population size and geographic range can be problematic and affect the accuracy of conservation assessments. Scarce data on mobile species and the resources they need can also limit the type of analytical approaches available to derive such estimates. We quantified change in availability and use of key ecological resources required for breeding for a critically endangered nomadic habitat specialist, the Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor). We compared estimates of occupied habitat derived from dynamic presence-background (i.e., presence-only data) climatic models with estimates derived from dynamic occupancy models that included a direct measure of food availability. We then compared estimates that incorporate fine-resolution spatial data on the availability of key ecological resources (i.e., functional habitats) with more common approaches that focus on broader climatic suitability or vegetation cover (due to the absence of fine-resolution data). The occupancy models produced significantly (P &lt; 0.001) smaller (up to an order of magnitude) and more spatially discrete estimates of the total occupied area than climate-based models. The spatial location and extent of the total area occupied with the occupancy models was highly variable between years (131 and 1498 km2). Estimates accounting for the area of functional habitats were significantly smaller (2–58% [SD 16]) than estimates based only on the total area occupied. An increase or decrease in the area of one functional habitat (foraging or nesting) did not necessarily correspond to an increase or decrease in the other. Thus, an increase in the extent of occupied area may not equate to improved habitat quality or function. We argue these patterns are typical for mobile resource specialists but often go unnoticed because of limited data over relevant spatial and temporal scales and lack of spatial data on the availability of key resources. Understanding changes in the relative availability of functional habitats is crucial to informing conservation planning and accurately assessing extinction risk for mobile resource specialists.


La Importancia de la Incorporación de los Hábitats Funcionales dentro de la Planeación de la Conservación para las Especies Altamente Móviles en Sistemas Dinámicos

Resumen
La distribución de las especies móviles en los sistemas dinámicos puede variar enormemente con el tiempo y el espacio. Estimar el tamaño de la población y la extensión geográfica puede ser problemático y afecta la certeza de las valoraciones de conservación. Los datos escasos sobre las especies móviles y los recursos que necesitan también pueden limitar el tipo de estrategias analíticas disponibles para derivar dichos estimados. Cuantificamos el cambio en la disponibilidad y el uso de los recursos ecológicos clave requeridos para la reproducción en un especialista nómada y en peligro de extinción crítico: el periquito migrador (Lathamus discolor). Comparamos los estimados del hábitat ocupado derivados de los modelos climáticos dinámicos de presencia-segundo plano (es decir, datos de sólo-presencia) con los estimados derivados de los modelos de ocupación dinámica que incluyeron una medida directa de la disponibilidad de alimento. Después comparamos los estimados que incorporan datos espaciales de alta resolución sobre la disponibilidad de recursos ecológicos clave (es decir, los hábitats funcionales) con estrategias más comunes que se enfocan en una idoneidad climática más general o en la cobertura vegetal (debido a la ausencia de datos de alta resolución). Los modelos de ocupación produjeron estimados más pequeños significativamente (p&lt;0.001) y más discretos espacialmente del área total ocupada que los modelos con base climática. La ubicación espacial y la extensión del área ocupada total fueron altamente variables entre años (131-1498 km2) con los modelos de ocupación. Los estimados que representan el área de los hábitats funcionales fueron más pequeños significativamente (2–58% [DS 16]) que los estimados basados solamente en el área total ocupada. Un incremento o disminución en el área de un hábitat funcional (búsqueda de alimento o anidación) no correspondió necesariamente con un incremento o disminución en el otro. Así, un incremento en la extensión del área ocupada puede no ser igual a un incremento en la función o calidad del hábitat. Argumentamos que estos patrones son típicos para los especialistas en recursos móviles pero son ignorados comúnmente debido a los datos limitados sobre las escalas espaciales y temporales relevantes y a la falta de datos espaciales sobre la disponibilidad de recursos clave. Entender los cambios en la disponibilidad relativa de los hábitats funcionales es crucial para informar a la planeación de la conservación y valorar con certeza el riesgo de extinción de los especialistas en recursos móviles.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12894" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Global lessons from successful rhinoceros conservation in Nepal</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12894</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Global lessons from successful rhinoceros conservation in Nepal</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Achyut Aryal, Krishna Prasad Acharya, Uttam Babu Shrestha, Maheshwar Dhakal, David Raubenhiemer, Wendy Wright</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-25T11:40:30.70635-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12894</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12894</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12894</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Diversity</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12931" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Extinction, Mechanisms of Life, and Practice of Conservation on an Island</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12931</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Extinction, Mechanisms of Life, and Practice of Conservation on an Island</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marco Ferrante</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-11T08:55:42.908504-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12931</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12931</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12931</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12895" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for conservation and management</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12895</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for conservation and management</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven J. Cooke, Vivian M. Nguyen, Steven T. Kessel, Nigel E. Hussey, Nathan Young, Adam T. Ford</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-20T14:10:36.0694-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12895</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12895</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12895</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Diversity</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12862" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Comprehending History for Conserving the Commons</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12862</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Comprehending History for Conserving the Commons</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Athanasios S. Kallimanis</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2016-12-01T15:50:41.590982-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12862</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12862</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12862</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12801" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Assumption-versus data-based approaches to summarizing species’ ranges</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12801</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Assumption-versus data-based approaches to summarizing species’ ranges</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A. Townsend Peterson, Adolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza, Alejandro Gordillo</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2016-11-09T16:10:01.489831-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12801</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12801</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12801</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>For conservation decision making, species’ geographic distributions are mapped using various approaches. Some such efforts have downscaled versions of coarse-resolution extent-of-occurrence maps to fine resolutions for conservation planning. We examined the quality of the extent-of-occurrence maps as range summaries and the utility of refining those maps into fine-resolution distributional hypotheses. Extent-of-occurrence maps tend to be overly simple, omit many known and well-documented populations, and likely frequently include many areas not holding populations. Refinement steps involve typological assumptions about habitat preferences and elevational ranges of species, which can introduce substantial error in estimates of species’ true areas of distribution. However, no model-evaluation steps are taken to assess the predictive ability of these models, so model inaccuracies are not noticed. Whereas range summaries derived by these methods may be useful in coarse-grained, global-extent studies, their continued use in on-the-ground conservation applications at fine spatial resolutions is not advisable in light of reliance on assumptions, lack of real spatial resolution, and lack of testing. In contrast, data-driven techniques that integrate primary data on biodiversity occurrence with remotely sensed data that summarize environmental dimensions (i.e., ecological niche modeling or species distribution modeling) offer data-driven solutions based on a minimum of assumptions that can be evaluated and validated quantitatively to offer a well-founded, widely accepted method for summarizing species’ distributional patterns for conservation applications.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12801-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Suposiciones Versus Estrategias Basadas en Datos para Resumir la Extensión de las Especies</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12801-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Para la toma de decisiones de conservación, las distribuciones geográficas de las especies se mapean utilizando diversas estrategias. Algunos de esos esfuerzos han reducido la escala de mapas de extensión de presencia con resolución gruesa hasta unos con resolución fina para su uso en la planeación de la conservación. Examinamos la calidad de los mapas de área de presencia como resúmenes de la distribución y la utilidad de refinar aquellos mapas en hipótesis de distribución de resolución fina. Los mapas de extensión de presencia tienden a ser demasiado simples, a omitir muchas poblaciones conocidas y bien documentadas, y muy probablemente, con frecuencia incluyen muchas áreas que no contienen poblaciones. Los pasos para la refinación involucran suposiciones tipológicas sobre las preferencias de hábitat y el intervalo de elevación de las especies, lo cual puede introducir un error sustancial en el estimado de las verdaderas áreas de distribución de las especies. Sin embargo, no se toma en cuenta ninguno de los pasos de evaluación de modelos para valorar la habilidad predictiva de estos modelos, así que las imprecisiones de los modelos no se notan. Mientras que los resúmenes de extensión derivados de estos métodos pueden ser útiles en estudios de extensión global con resolución gruesa, su uso continuo en las aplicaciones de la conservación en sitios que requieren resoluciones finas no es aconsejable por la dependencia de las suposiciones, la falta de una verdadera resolución espacial y la falta de pruebas. En contraste, las técnicas conducidas por datos que integran datos primarios de presencia de la biodiversidad con datos de telemetría que resumieron las dimensiones ambientales (es decir, el modelado del nicho ecológico o el modelado de distribución de especies) ofrecieron soluciones basadas en un mínimo de suposiciones que pueden ser evaluadas y validadas cuantitativamente para ofrecer un método bien fundamentado y aceptado ampliamente para el resumen de los patrones de distribución de las especies para su aplicación en la conservación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

For conservation decision making, species’ geographic distributions are mapped using various approaches. Some such efforts have downscaled versions of coarse-resolution extent-of-occurrence maps to fine resolutions for conservation planning. We examined the quality of the extent-of-occurrence maps as range summaries and the utility of refining those maps into fine-resolution distributional hypotheses. Extent-of-occurrence maps tend to be overly simple, omit many known and well-documented populations, and likely frequently include many areas not holding populations. Refinement steps involve typological assumptions about habitat preferences and elevational ranges of species, which can introduce substantial error in estimates of species’ true areas of distribution. However, no model-evaluation steps are taken to assess the predictive ability of these models, so model inaccuracies are not noticed. Whereas range summaries derived by these methods may be useful in coarse-grained, global-extent studies, their continued use in on-the-ground conservation applications at fine spatial resolutions is not advisable in light of reliance on assumptions, lack of real spatial resolution, and lack of testing. In contrast, data-driven techniques that integrate primary data on biodiversity occurrence with remotely sensed data that summarize environmental dimensions (i.e., ecological niche modeling or species distribution modeling) offer data-driven solutions based on a minimum of assumptions that can be evaluated and validated quantitatively to offer a well-founded, widely accepted method for summarizing species’ distributional patterns for conservation applications.


Suposiciones Versus Estrategias Basadas en Datos para Resumir la Extensión de las Especies

Resumen
Para la toma de decisiones de conservación, las distribuciones geográficas de las especies se mapean utilizando diversas estrategias. Algunos de esos esfuerzos han reducido la escala de mapas de extensión de presencia con resolución gruesa hasta unos con resolución fina para su uso en la planeación de la conservación. Examinamos la calidad de los mapas de área de presencia como resúmenes de la distribución y la utilidad de refinar aquellos mapas en hipótesis de distribución de resolución fina. Los mapas de extensión de presencia tienden a ser demasiado simples, a omitir muchas poblaciones conocidas y bien documentadas, y muy probablemente, con frecuencia incluyen muchas áreas que no contienen poblaciones. Los pasos para la refinación involucran suposiciones tipológicas sobre las preferencias de hábitat y el intervalo de elevación de las especies, lo cual puede introducir un error sustancial en el estimado de las verdaderas áreas de distribución de las especies. Sin embargo, no se toma en cuenta ninguno de los pasos de evaluación de modelos para valorar la habilidad predictiva de estos modelos, así que las imprecisiones de los modelos no se notan. Mientras que los resúmenes de extensión derivados de estos métodos pueden ser útiles en estudios de extensión global con resolución gruesa, su uso continuo en las aplicaciones de la conservación en sitios que requieren resoluciones finas no es aconsejable por la dependencia de las suposiciones, la falta de una verdadera resolución espacial y la falta de pruebas. En contraste, las técnicas conducidas por datos que integran datos primarios de presencia de la biodiversidad con datos de telemetría que resumieron las dimensiones ambientales (es decir, el modelado del nicho ecológico o el modelado de distribución de especies) ofrecieron soluciones basadas en un mínimo de suposiciones que pueden ser evaluadas y validadas cuantitativamente para ofrecer un método bien fundamentado y aceptado ampliamente para el resumen de los patrones de distribución de las especies para su aplicación en la conservación.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12806" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The Effects of Climate Change and Human Persecution of Birds</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12806</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Effects of Climate Change and Human Persecution of Birds</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zsolt Végvári</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2016-09-30T17:27:34.871972-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12806</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12806</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12806</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12971" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Cover Caption</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12971</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cover Caption</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-12T10:59:47.751458-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12971</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12971</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12971</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Cover Caption</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">i</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">i</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12823" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Issue Information - TOC</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12823</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Issue Information - TOC</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-12T10:59:48.20468-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12823</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12823</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12823</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Issue Information</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">739</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">740</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12824" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Issue Information - Copyright page</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12824</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Issue Information - Copyright page</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-12T10:59:47.802992-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12824</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12824</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12824</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Issue Information</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">741</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">741</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12898" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Beehive fences as a multidimensional conflict-mitigation tool for farmers coexisting with elephants</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12898</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beehive fences as a multidimensional conflict-mitigation tool for farmers coexisting with elephants</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucy E. King, Fredrick Lala, Hesron Nzumu, Emmanuel Mwambingu, Iain Douglas-Hamilton</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-21T08:46:49.764224-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12898</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12898</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12898</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Practice and Policy</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">743</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">752</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Increasing habitat fragmentation and human population growth in Africa has resulted in an escalation in human–elephant conflict between small-scale farmers and free-ranging African elephants (<i>Loxodonta Africana</i>). In 2012 Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) implemented the national 10-year Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya, which includes an action aimed at testing whether beehive fences can be used to mitigate human–elephant conflict. From 2012 to 2015, we field-tested the efficacy of beehive fences to protect 10 0.4-ha farms next to Tsavo East National Park from elephants. We hung a series of beehives every 10 m around the boundary of each farm plot. The hives were linked with strong wire. After an initial pilot test with 2 farms, the remaining 8 of 10 beehive fences also contained 2-dimensional dummy hives between real beehives to help reduce the cost of the fence. Each trial plot had a neighboring control plot of the same size within the same farm. Of the 131 beehives deployed 88% were occupied at least once during the 3.5-year trial. Two hundred and fifty-three elephants, predominantly 20–45 years old entered the community farming area, typically during the crop- ripening season. Eighty percent of the elephants that approached the trial farms were kept out of the areas protected by the beehive fences, and elephants that broke a fence were in smaller than average groups. Beehive fences not only kept large groups of elephants from invading the farmland plots but the farmers also benefited socially and financially from the sale of 228 kg of elephant-friendly honey. As news of the success of the trial spread, a further 12 farmers requested to join the project, bringing the number of beehive fence protected farms to 22 and beehives to 297. This demonstrates positive adoption of beehive fences as a community mitigation tool. Understanding the response of elephants to the beehive fences, the seasonality of crop raiding and fence breaking, and the willingness of the community to engage with the mitigation method will help contribute to future management strategies for this high human–elephant conflict hotspot and other similar areas in Kenya.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12898-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Cercos de Panales como una Herramienta Multidimensional para la Mitigación de Conflictos entre Agricultores y Elefantes</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12898-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El incremento de la fragmentación del hábitat y el crecimiento de la población humana en África han resultado en un aumento del conflicto entre los pequeños agricultores y los elefantes africanos (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) libres. En el 2012, el Servicio de Vida Silvestre de Kenia (KWS, en inglés) implementó a nivel nacional la Estrategia de Manejo y Conservación para el Elefante en Kenia con duración de 10 años, la cual incluye una acción enfocada en probar si los cercos de panales pueden utilizarse para mitigar el conflicto humano – elefante. De 2012 a 2015, probamos en el campo la eficiencia de los cercos de panales para proteger de los elefantes a diez granjas de 0.4 ha colindantes con el Parque Nacional Tsavo del Este. Colgamos una sere de panales cada 10 m alrededor de los límites de cada lote agrícola. Los panales se conectaron con un alambre fuerte. Después de una prueba piloto inicial en dos granjas, los ocho permanecientes de los diez cercos con panales también incluyeron panales-señuelo bidimensionales entre los panales verdaderos para ayudar a reducir el costo del cerco. Cada lote de prueba tuvo un lote de control vecino del mismo tamaño dentro de la misma granja. De los 131 panales implementados, el 88% fue ocupado por lo menos una vez durante la prueba de 3.5 años. Doscientos cincuenta y tres elefantes, predominantemente entre los 20 – 45 años de edad, entraron a la comunidad agrícola, comúnmente durante la temporada de maduración de las cosechas. El 80 % de los elefantes que se acercaron a las granjas de prueba se mantuvieron fuera de las áreas protegidas por los cercos de panales, y los elefantes que rompieron los cercos estuvieron dentro de grupos más pequeños al promedio. Los cercos de panales no sólo hicieron que grupos grandes de elefantes no invadieran los lotes agrícolas, sino los agricultores también se beneficiaron socialmente con la venta de 228 kg de miel amigable con los elefantes. Conforme se informó sobre el éxito de la prueba piloto, doce agricultores más pidieron unirse al proyecto, lo que llevó al número de granjas protegidas por cercos de panales a 22 y al de los panales a 297. Esto demuestra la adopción positiva de los cercos de panales como una herramienta comunitaria de mitigación. Entender la respuesta de los elefantes a los cercos de panales, la temporalidad de las incursiones hacia las cosechas y de la ruptura de los cercos, y la disponibilidad de la comunidad por participar en el método de mitigación ayudará a contribuir con las siguientes estrategias de manejo para este gran punto caliente del conflicto humano – elefante y en otras áreas similares en Kenia.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Increasing habitat fragmentation and human population growth in Africa has resulted in an escalation in human–elephant conflict between small-scale farmers and free-ranging African elephants (Loxodonta Africana). In 2012 Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) implemented the national 10-year Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya, which includes an action aimed at testing whether beehive fences can be used to mitigate human–elephant conflict. From 2012 to 2015, we field-tested the efficacy of beehive fences to protect 10 0.4-ha farms next to Tsavo East National Park from elephants. We hung a series of beehives every 10 m around the boundary of each farm plot. The hives were linked with strong wire. After an initial pilot test with 2 farms, the remaining 8 of 10 beehive fences also contained 2-dimensional dummy hives between real beehives to help reduce the cost of the fence. Each trial plot had a neighboring control plot of the same size within the same farm. Of the 131 beehives deployed 88% were occupied at least once during the 3.5-year trial. Two hundred and fifty-three elephants, predominantly 20–45 years old entered the community farming area, typically during the crop- ripening season. Eighty percent of the elephants that approached the trial farms were kept out of the areas protected by the beehive fences, and elephants that broke a fence were in smaller than average groups. Beehive fences not only kept large groups of elephants from invading the farmland plots but the farmers also benefited socially and financially from the sale of 228 kg of elephant-friendly honey. As news of the success of the trial spread, a further 12 farmers requested to join the project, bringing the number of beehive fence protected farms to 22 and beehives to 297. This demonstrates positive adoption of beehive fences as a community mitigation tool. Understanding the response of elephants to the beehive fences, the seasonality of crop raiding and fence breaking, and the willingness of the community to engage with the mitigation method will help contribute to future management strategies for this high human–elephant conflict hotspot and other similar areas in Kenya.


Cercos de Panales como una Herramienta Multidimensional para la Mitigación de Conflictos entre Agricultores y Elefantes

Resumen
El incremento de la fragmentación del hábitat y el crecimiento de la población humana en África han resultado en un aumento del conflicto entre los pequeños agricultores y los elefantes africanos (Loxodonta africana) libres. En el 2012, el Servicio de Vida Silvestre de Kenia (KWS, en inglés) implementó a nivel nacional la Estrategia de Manejo y Conservación para el Elefante en Kenia con duración de 10 años, la cual incluye una acción enfocada en probar si los cercos de panales pueden utilizarse para mitigar el conflicto humano – elefante. De 2012 a 2015, probamos en el campo la eficiencia de los cercos de panales para proteger de los elefantes a diez granjas de 0.4 ha colindantes con el Parque Nacional Tsavo del Este. Colgamos una sere de panales cada 10 m alrededor de los límites de cada lote agrícola. Los panales se conectaron con un alambre fuerte. Después de una prueba piloto inicial en dos granjas, los ocho permanecientes de los diez cercos con panales también incluyeron panales-señuelo bidimensionales entre los panales verdaderos para ayudar a reducir el costo del cerco. Cada lote de prueba tuvo un lote de control vecino del mismo tamaño dentro de la misma granja. De los 131 panales implementados, el 88% fue ocupado por lo menos una vez durante la prueba de 3.5 años. Doscientos cincuenta y tres elefantes, predominantemente entre los 20 – 45 años de edad, entraron a la comunidad agrícola, comúnmente durante la temporada de maduración de las cosechas. El 80 % de los elefantes que se acercaron a las granjas de prueba se mantuvieron fuera de las áreas protegidas por los cercos de panales, y los elefantes que rompieron los cercos estuvieron dentro de grupos más pequeños al promedio. Los cercos de panales no sólo hicieron que grupos grandes de elefantes no invadieran los lotes agrícolas, sino los agricultores también se beneficiaron socialmente con la venta de 228 kg de miel amigable con los elefantes. Conforme se informó sobre el éxito de la prueba piloto, doce agricultores más pidieron unirse al proyecto, lo que llevó al número de granjas protegidas por cercos de panales a 22 y al de los panales a 297. Esto demuestra la adopción positiva de los cercos de panales como una herramienta comunitaria de mitigación. Entender la respuesta de los elefantes a los cercos de panales, la temporalidad de las incursiones hacia las cosechas y de la ruptura de los cercos, y la disponibilidad de la comunidad por participar en el método de mitigación ayudará a contribuir con las siguientes estrategias de manejo para este gran punto caliente del conflicto humano – elefante y en otras áreas similares en Kenia.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12896" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12896</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara Dubois, Nicole Fenwick, Erin A. Ryan, Liv Baker, Sandra E. Baker, Ngaio J. Beausoleil, Scott Carter, Barbara Cartwright, Federico Costa, Chris Draper, John Griffin, Adam Grogan, Gregg Howald, Bidda Jones, Kate E. Littin, Amanda T. Lombard, David J. Mellor, Daniel Ramp, Catherine A. Schuppli, David Fraser</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-09T14:48:45.186273-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12896</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12896</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12896</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Practice and Policy</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">753</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">760</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Human–wildlife conflicts are commonly addressed by excluding, relocating, or lethally controlling animals with the goal of preserving public health and safety, protecting property, or conserving other valued wildlife. However, declining wildlife populations, a lack of efficacy of control methods in achieving desired outcomes, and changes in how people value animals have triggered widespread acknowledgment of the need for ethical and evidence-based approaches to managing such conflicts. We explored international perspectives on and experiences with human–wildlife conflicts to develop principles for ethical wildlife control. A diverse panel of 20 experts convened at a 2-day workshop and developed the principles through a facilitated engagement process and discussion. They determined that efforts to control wildlife should begin wherever possible by altering the human practices that cause human–wildlife conflict and by developing a culture of coexistence; be justified by evidence that significant harms are being caused to people, property, livelihoods, ecosystems, and/or other animals; have measurable outcome-based objectives that are clear, achievable, monitored, and adaptive; predictably minimize animal welfare harms to the fewest number of animals; be informed by community values as well as scientific, technical, and practical information; be integrated into plans for systematic long-term management; and be based on the specifics of the situation rather than negative labels (pest, overabundant) applied to the target species. We recommend that these principles guide development of international, national, and local standards and control decisions and implementation.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12896-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Principios del Consenso Internacional para el Control Ético de la Vida Silvestre</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12896-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los conflictos entre los humanos y la vida silvestre son tratados comúnmente al excluir, reubicar o controlar letalmente a los animales con el objetivo de preservar la salud pública y la seguridad, proteger la propiedad o conservar a otros ejemplares valiosos de vida silvestre. Sin embargo, las poblaciones de vida silvestre declinantes, la falta de efectividad de los métodos de control para obtener los resultados deseados y los cambios en cómo las personas valoran a los animales han disparado un reconocimiento extendido por la necesidad de estrategias éticas basadas en evidencias para manejar dichos conflictos. Exploramos las perspectivas sobre y las experiencias internacionales con los conflictos entre humanos y vida silvestre para desarrollar los principios para un control ético de la vida silvestre. Un panel diverso de veinte expertos se reunió durante dos días en un taller y desarrolló los principios por medio de un proceso de participación facilitada y discusiones. Los expertos determinaron que los esfuerzos para controlar a la vida silvestre deberían comenzar en donde sea posible alterando las prácticas humanas que ocasionan el conflicto humano-vida silvestre y desarrollando una cultura de coexistencia; deberían estar justificados por la evidencia de los daños significativos que afectan a la gente, la propiedad, el sustento, los ecosistemas y otros animales; deberían tener objetivos medibles basados en resultados que son claros, alcanzables, monitoreados y adaptativos; deberían minimizar los daños al bienestar animal para el menor número de animales: deberían estar informados por los valores comunitarios así como la información científica, técnica y práctica; deberían ser integrados a los planes para el manejo sistemático a largo plazo; y deberían estar basados en las especificidades de la situación en lugar de las etiquetas negativas (plaga, sobreabundante) aplicadas a las especies objetivo. Recomendamos que estos principios guíen el desarrollo de los estándares internacionales, nacionales y locales y controlen las decisiones y su implementación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Human–wildlife conflicts are commonly addressed by excluding, relocating, or lethally controlling animals with the goal of preserving public health and safety, protecting property, or conserving other valued wildlife. However, declining wildlife populations, a lack of efficacy of control methods in achieving desired outcomes, and changes in how people value animals have triggered widespread acknowledgment of the need for ethical and evidence-based approaches to managing such conflicts. We explored international perspectives on and experiences with human–wildlife conflicts to develop principles for ethical wildlife control. A diverse panel of 20 experts convened at a 2-day workshop and developed the principles through a facilitated engagement process and discussion. They determined that efforts to control wildlife should begin wherever possible by altering the human practices that cause human–wildlife conflict and by developing a culture of coexistence; be justified by evidence that significant harms are being caused to people, property, livelihoods, ecosystems, and/or other animals; have measurable outcome-based objectives that are clear, achievable, monitored, and adaptive; predictably minimize animal welfare harms to the fewest number of animals; be informed by community values as well as scientific, technical, and practical information; be integrated into plans for systematic long-term management; and be based on the specifics of the situation rather than negative labels (pest, overabundant) applied to the target species. We recommend that these principles guide development of international, national, and local standards and control decisions and implementation.


Principios del Consenso Internacional para el Control Ético de la Vida Silvestre

Resumen
Los conflictos entre los humanos y la vida silvestre son tratados comúnmente al excluir, reubicar o controlar letalmente a los animales con el objetivo de preservar la salud pública y la seguridad, proteger la propiedad o conservar a otros ejemplares valiosos de vida silvestre. Sin embargo, las poblaciones de vida silvestre declinantes, la falta de efectividad de los métodos de control para obtener los resultados deseados y los cambios en cómo las personas valoran a los animales han disparado un reconocimiento extendido por la necesidad de estrategias éticas basadas en evidencias para manejar dichos conflictos. Exploramos las perspectivas sobre y las experiencias internacionales con los conflictos entre humanos y vida silvestre para desarrollar los principios para un control ético de la vida silvestre. Un panel diverso de veinte expertos se reunió durante dos días en un taller y desarrolló los principios por medio de un proceso de participación facilitada y discusiones. Los expertos determinaron que los esfuerzos para controlar a la vida silvestre deberían comenzar en donde sea posible alterando las prácticas humanas que ocasionan el conflicto humano-vida silvestre y desarrollando una cultura de coexistencia; deberían estar justificados por la evidencia de los daños significativos que afectan a la gente, la propiedad, el sustento, los ecosistemas y otros animales; deberían tener objetivos medibles basados en resultados que son claros, alcanzables, monitoreados y adaptativos; deberían minimizar los daños al bienestar animal para el menor número de animales: deberían estar informados por los valores comunitarios así como la información científica, técnica y práctica; deberían ser integrados a los planes para el manejo sistemático a largo plazo; y deberían estar basados en las especificidades de la situación en lugar de las etiquetas negativas (plaga, sobreabundante) aplicadas a las especies objetivo. Recomendamos que estos principios guíen el desarrollo de los estándares internacionales, nacionales y locales y controlen las decisiones y su implementación.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12885" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Control of invasive rats on islands and priorities for future action</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12885</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Control of invasive rats on islands and priorities for future action</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Quiterie Duron, Aaron B. Shiels, Eric Vidal</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-18T11:55:47.035395-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12885</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12885</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12885</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">761</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">771</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Invasive rats are one of the world's most successful animal groups that cause native species extinctions and ecosystem change, particularly on islands. On large islands, rat eradication is often impossible and population control, defined as the local limitation of rat abundance, is now routinely performed on many of the world's islands as an alternative management tool. However, a synthesis of the motivations, techniques, costs, and outcomes of such rat-control projects is lacking. We reviewed the literature, searched relevant websites, and conducted a survey via a questionnaire to synthesize the available information on rat-control projects in island natural areas worldwide to improve rat management and native species conservation. Data were collected from 136 projects conducted over the last 40 years; most were located in Australasia (46%) and the tropical Pacific (25%) in forest ecosystems (65%) and coastal strands (22%). Most of the projects targeted <i>Rattus rattus</i> and most (82%) were aimed at protecting birds and endangered ecosystems. Poisoning (35%) and a combination of trapping and poisoning (42%) were the most common methods. Poisoning allows for treatment of larger areas, and poison projects generally last longer than trapping projects. Second-generation anticoagulants (mainly brodifacoum and bromadiolone) were used most often. The median annual cost for rat-control projects was US$17,262 or US$227/ha. Median project duration was 4 years. For 58% of the projects, rat population reduction was reported, and 51% of projects showed evidence of positive effects on biodiversity. Our data were from few countries, revealing the need to expand rat-control distribution especially in some biodiversity hotspots. Improvement in control methods is needed as is regular monitoring to assess short- and long-term effectiveness of rat-control.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12885-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Control de Ratas Invasoras en Islas y las Prioridades para la Acción a Futuro</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12885-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las ratas invasoras son uno de los grupos animales más exitosos a nivel mundial que ocasionan la extinción de especies nativas y cambios en los ecosistemas, particularmente en las islas. En las islas grandes, la erradicación de las ratas es generalmente imposible y el control de población, definido como la limitación local de la abundancia de ratas, hoy en día se practica rutinariamente en muchas de las islas del mundo como una herramienta alternativa de manejo. Sin embargo, se carece de una síntesis de motivaciones, técnicas, costos y resultados de dichos proyectos de control de ratas. Revisamos la literatura, buscamos sitios web relevantes, y realizamos una encuesta por medio de un cuestionario para sintetizar la información disponible sobre los proyectos de control de ratas en las áreas naturales isleñas en todo el mundo para así mejorar el manejo de ratas y la conservación de especies nativas. Se recolectaron datos de 136 proyectos que se realizaron en los últimos 40 años; la mayoría se ubicaron en Australasia (46 %) y el Pacífico tropical (25 %) en ecosistemas boscosos (65 %) y franjas costeras (22 %). La mayoría de los proyectos estaban enfocados en <i>Rattus rattus,</i> y la mayoría (82 %) estaban centrados en la protección de aves y ecosistemas en peligro de extinción. Los métodos más comunes fueron el envenenamiento (35 %) y una combinación de trampas y veneno (42 %). El envenenamiento permite tratar con áreas más grandes y generalmente dura más tiempo que el trampeo. Los anti-coagulantes de segunda generación (principalmente el brodifacoum y la briomadiolona) fueron los más usados. El costo medio anual de los proyectos de control de ratas fue de US$17,262 o de US$227/ha. La duración media de los proyectos fue de cuatro años. Para el 58 % de los proyectos, se reportó una reducción en la población de ratas, y el 51 % de los proyectos mostró evidencias de un efecto positivo sobre la biodiversidad. Nuestros datos provienen de pocos países, lo que revela la necesidad de expandir la distribución del control de ratas, especialmente en algunos puntos calientes de biodiversidad. Se necesita mejorar los métodos del control, así como un monitoreo regular para evaluar la efectividad del control de ratas a corto y largo plazo.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Invasive rats are one of the world's most successful animal groups that cause native species extinctions and ecosystem change, particularly on islands. On large islands, rat eradication is often impossible and population control, defined as the local limitation of rat abundance, is now routinely performed on many of the world's islands as an alternative management tool. However, a synthesis of the motivations, techniques, costs, and outcomes of such rat-control projects is lacking. We reviewed the literature, searched relevant websites, and conducted a survey via a questionnaire to synthesize the available information on rat-control projects in island natural areas worldwide to improve rat management and native species conservation. Data were collected from 136 projects conducted over the last 40 years; most were located in Australasia (46%) and the tropical Pacific (25%) in forest ecosystems (65%) and coastal strands (22%). Most of the projects targeted Rattus rattus and most (82%) were aimed at protecting birds and endangered ecosystems. Poisoning (35%) and a combination of trapping and poisoning (42%) were the most common methods. Poisoning allows for treatment of larger areas, and poison projects generally last longer than trapping projects. Second-generation anticoagulants (mainly brodifacoum and bromadiolone) were used most often. The median annual cost for rat-control projects was US$17,262 or US$227/ha. Median project duration was 4 years. For 58% of the projects, rat population reduction was reported, and 51% of projects showed evidence of positive effects on biodiversity. Our data were from few countries, revealing the need to expand rat-control distribution especially in some biodiversity hotspots. Improvement in control methods is needed as is regular monitoring to assess short- and long-term effectiveness of rat-control.


Control de Ratas Invasoras en Islas y las Prioridades para la Acción a Futuro

Resumen
Las ratas invasoras son uno de los grupos animales más exitosos a nivel mundial que ocasionan la extinción de especies nativas y cambios en los ecosistemas, particularmente en las islas. En las islas grandes, la erradicación de las ratas es generalmente imposible y el control de población, definido como la limitación local de la abundancia de ratas, hoy en día se practica rutinariamente en muchas de las islas del mundo como una herramienta alternativa de manejo. Sin embargo, se carece de una síntesis de motivaciones, técnicas, costos y resultados de dichos proyectos de control de ratas. Revisamos la literatura, buscamos sitios web relevantes, y realizamos una encuesta por medio de un cuestionario para sintetizar la información disponible sobre los proyectos de control de ratas en las áreas naturales isleñas en todo el mundo para así mejorar el manejo de ratas y la conservación de especies nativas. Se recolectaron datos de 136 proyectos que se realizaron en los últimos 40 años; la mayoría se ubicaron en Australasia (46 %) y el Pacífico tropical (25 %) en ecosistemas boscosos (65 %) y franjas costeras (22 %). La mayoría de los proyectos estaban enfocados en Rattus rattus, y la mayoría (82 %) estaban centrados en la protección de aves y ecosistemas en peligro de extinción. Los métodos más comunes fueron el envenenamiento (35 %) y una combinación de trampas y veneno (42 %). El envenenamiento permite tratar con áreas más grandes y generalmente dura más tiempo que el trampeo. Los anti-coagulantes de segunda generación (principalmente el brodifacoum y la briomadiolona) fueron los más usados. El costo medio anual de los proyectos de control de ratas fue de US$17,262 o de US$227/ha. La duración media de los proyectos fue de cuatro años. Para el 58 % de los proyectos, se reportó una reducción en la población de ratas, y el 51 % de los proyectos mostró evidencias de un efecto positivo sobre la biodiversidad. Nuestros datos provienen de pocos países, lo que revela la necesidad de expandir la distribución del control de ratas, especialmente en algunos puntos calientes de biodiversidad. Se necesita mejorar los métodos del control, así como un monitoreo regular para evaluar la efectividad del control de ratas a corto y largo plazo.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12855" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12855</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Manfredo, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Tara L. Teel, David Fulton, Shalom H. Schwartz, Robert Arlinghaus, Shigehiro Oishi, Ayse K. Uskul, Kent Redford, Shinobu Kitayama, Leeann Sullivan</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-13T16:00:25.258218-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12855</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12855</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12855</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">772</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">780</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The hope for creating widespread change in social values has endured among conservation professionals since early calls by Aldo Leopold for a “land ethic.” However, there has been little serious attention in conservation to the fields of investigation that address values, how they are formed, and how they change. We introduce a social–ecological systems conceptual approach in which values are seen not only as motivational goals people hold but also as ideas that are deeply embedded in society's material culture, collective behaviors, traditions, and institutions. Values define and bind groups, organizations, and societies; serve an adaptive role; and are typically stable across generations. When abrupt value changes occur, they are in response to substantial alterations in the social–ecological context. Such changes build on prior value structures and do not result in complete replacement. Given this understanding of values, we conclude that deliberate efforts to orchestrate value shifts for conservation are unlikely to be effective. Instead, there is an urgent need for research on values with a multilevel and dynamic view that can inform innovative conservation strategies for working within existing value structures. New directions facilitated by a systems approach will enhance understanding of the role values play in shaping conservation challenges and improve management of the human component of conservation.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12855-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Por Qué los Valores Sociales No Pueden Ser Cambiados por el Bien de la Conservación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12855-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La esperanza por crear un cambio extenso en los valores sociales ha perdurado entre los profesionales de la conservación desde las primeras peticiones de Aldo Leopold por una “ética de la tierra”. Sin embargo, en la conservación se ha prestado poca atención seria a los campos de investigación que tratan con los valores, cómo se forman y cómo cambian. Introdujimos una estrategia conceptual a los sistemas socio-ecológicos en los que los valores no son sólo vistos como objetivos motivacionales que las personas tienen, sino también como ideas que están arraigadas profundamente en la cultura material, los comportamientos colectivos, las tradiciones y las instituciones de la sociedad. Los valores definen y unen a los grupos, organizaciones y sociedades; cumplen con un papel adaptativo; y comúnmente son estables a lo largo de las generaciones. Cuando ocurren cambios abruptos en los valores, son en respuesta a las alteraciones sustanciales en el contexto socio-ecológico. Dichos cambios se basan en las estructuras previas de los valores y no resultan en un remplazo completo. Dado este entendimiento de los valores, concluimos que los esfuerzos deliberados por orquestar cambios en los valores para la conservación tienen poca probabilidad de ser efectivos. En su lugar, existe una necesidad urgente de investigación sobre los valores con una visión multi-nivel y dinámica que puede informar estrategias innovadoras de conservación para trabajar con las estructuras existentes de valores. Las nuevas direcciones facilitadas por una estrategia de sistemas mejorarán el entendimiento del papel que juegan los valores en la formación de los obstáculos para la conservación y perfeccionarán el manejo del componente humano en la conservación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The hope for creating widespread change in social values has endured among conservation professionals since early calls by Aldo Leopold for a “land ethic.” However, there has been little serious attention in conservation to the fields of investigation that address values, how they are formed, and how they change. We introduce a social–ecological systems conceptual approach in which values are seen not only as motivational goals people hold but also as ideas that are deeply embedded in society's material culture, collective behaviors, traditions, and institutions. Values define and bind groups, organizations, and societies; serve an adaptive role; and are typically stable across generations. When abrupt value changes occur, they are in response to substantial alterations in the social–ecological context. Such changes build on prior value structures and do not result in complete replacement. Given this understanding of values, we conclude that deliberate efforts to orchestrate value shifts for conservation are unlikely to be effective. Instead, there is an urgent need for research on values with a multilevel and dynamic view that can inform innovative conservation strategies for working within existing value structures. New directions facilitated by a systems approach will enhance understanding of the role values play in shaping conservation challenges and improve management of the human component of conservation.


Por Qué los Valores Sociales No Pueden Ser Cambiados por el Bien de la Conservación

Resumen
La esperanza por crear un cambio extenso en los valores sociales ha perdurado entre los profesionales de la conservación desde las primeras peticiones de Aldo Leopold por una “ética de la tierra”. Sin embargo, en la conservación se ha prestado poca atención seria a los campos de investigación que tratan con los valores, cómo se forman y cómo cambian. Introdujimos una estrategia conceptual a los sistemas socio-ecológicos en los que los valores no son sólo vistos como objetivos motivacionales que las personas tienen, sino también como ideas que están arraigadas profundamente en la cultura material, los comportamientos colectivos, las tradiciones y las instituciones de la sociedad. Los valores definen y unen a los grupos, organizaciones y sociedades; cumplen con un papel adaptativo; y comúnmente son estables a lo largo de las generaciones. Cuando ocurren cambios abruptos en los valores, son en respuesta a las alteraciones sustanciales en el contexto socio-ecológico. Dichos cambios se basan en las estructuras previas de los valores y no resultan en un remplazo completo. Dado este entendimiento de los valores, concluimos que los esfuerzos deliberados por orquestar cambios en los valores para la conservación tienen poca probabilidad de ser efectivos. En su lugar, existe una necesidad urgente de investigación sobre los valores con una visión multi-nivel y dinámica que puede informar estrategias innovadoras de conservación para trabajar con las estructuras existentes de valores. Las nuevas direcciones facilitadas por una estrategia de sistemas mejorarán el entendimiento del papel que juegan los valores en la formación de los obstáculos para la conservación y perfeccionarán el manejo del componente humano en la conservación.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12876" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Fixism and conservation science</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12876</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fixism and conservation science</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexandre Robert, Colin Fontaine, Simon Veron, Anne-Christine Monnet, Marine Legrand, Joanne Clavel, Stéphane Chantepie, Denis Couvet, Frédéric Ducarme, Benoît Fontaine, Frédéric Jiguet, Isabelle le Viol, Jonathan Rolland, François Sarrazin, Céline Teplitsky, Maud Mouchet</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-20T14:05:22.585064-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12876</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12876</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12876</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">781</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">788</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The field of biodiversity conservation has recently been criticized as relying on a fixist view of the living world in which existing species constitute at the same time targets of conservation efforts and static states of reference, which is in apparent disagreement with evolutionary dynamics. We reviewed the prominent role of species as conservation units and the common benchmark approach to conservation that aims to use past biodiversity as a reference to conserve current biodiversity. We found that the species approach is justified by the discrepancy between the time scales of macroevolution and human influence and that biodiversity benchmarks are based on reference processes rather than fixed reference states. Overall, we argue that the ethical and theoretical frameworks underlying conservation research are based on macroevolutionary processes, such as extinction dynamics. Current species, phylogenetic, community, and functional conservation approaches constitute short-term responses to short-term human effects on these reference processes, and these approaches are consistent with evolutionary principles.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12876-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Fijismo y la Ciencia de la Conservación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12876-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>El campo de la conservación de la biodiversidad ha sido criticado recientemente como dependiente de una visión fijista de los seres vivos, en el cual las especies existentes son a la vez objetivos de los esfuerzos de conservación y de los estados estáticos de referencia, lo cual está en desacuerdo aparente con las dinámicas evolutivas. En general, argumentamos que los marcos de trabajo éticos y teóricos que subyacen a la investigación en la conservación están basados en procesos macro-evolutivos, como las dinámicas de extinción. Las estrategias de conservación actuales enfocadas en especies, comunidades, filogenéticas y funcionales constituyen una respuesta a corto plazo a los efectos a corto plazo de los humanos sobre estos procesos de referencia y estas estrategias son congruentes con los principios evolutivos.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The field of biodiversity conservation has recently been criticized as relying on a fixist view of the living world in which existing species constitute at the same time targets of conservation efforts and static states of reference, which is in apparent disagreement with evolutionary dynamics. We reviewed the prominent role of species as conservation units and the common benchmark approach to conservation that aims to use past biodiversity as a reference to conserve current biodiversity. We found that the species approach is justified by the discrepancy between the time scales of macroevolution and human influence and that biodiversity benchmarks are based on reference processes rather than fixed reference states. Overall, we argue that the ethical and theoretical frameworks underlying conservation research are based on macroevolutionary processes, such as extinction dynamics. Current species, phylogenetic, community, and functional conservation approaches constitute short-term responses to short-term human effects on these reference processes, and these approaches are consistent with evolutionary principles.


El Fijismo y la Ciencia de la Conservación

Resumen
El campo de la conservación de la biodiversidad ha sido criticado recientemente como dependiente de una visión fijista de los seres vivos, en el cual las especies existentes son a la vez objetivos de los esfuerzos de conservación y de los estados estáticos de referencia, lo cual está en desacuerdo aparente con las dinámicas evolutivas. En general, argumentamos que los marcos de trabajo éticos y teóricos que subyacen a la investigación en la conservación están basados en procesos macro-evolutivos, como las dinámicas de extinción. Las estrategias de conservación actuales enfocadas en especies, comunidades, filogenéticas y funcionales constituyen una respuesta a corto plazo a los efectos a corto plazo de los humanos sobre estos procesos de referencia y estas estrategias son congruentes con los principios evolutivos.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12857" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A roadmap for knowledge exchange and mobilization research in conservation and natural resource management</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12857</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A roadmap for knowledge exchange and mobilization research in conservation and natural resource management</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivian M. Nguyen, Nathan Young, Steven J. Cooke</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-09T14:48:42.9811-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12857</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12857</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12857</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Essay</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">789</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">798</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Scholars across all disciplines have long been interested in how knowledge moves within and beyond their community of peers. Rapid environmental changes and calls for sustainable management practices mean the best knowledge possible is needed to inform decisions, policies, and practices to protect biodiversity and sustainably manage vulnerable natural resources. Although the conservation literature on knowledge exchange (KE) and knowledge mobilization (KM) has grown in recent years, much of it is based on context-specific case studies. This presents a challenge for learning cumulative lessons from KE and KM research and thus effectively using knowledge in conservation and natural resources management. Although continued research on the gap between knowledge and action is valuable, overarching conceptual frameworks are now needed to enable summaries and comparisons across diverse KE-KM research. We propose a knowledge-action framework that provides a conceptual roadmap for future research and practice in KE/KM with the aim of synthesizing lessons learned from contextual case studies and guiding the development and testing of hypotheses in this domain. Our knowledge-action framework has 3 elements that occur at multiple levels and scales: knowledge production (e.g., academia and government), knowledge mediation (e.g., knowledge networks, actors, relational dimension, and contextual dimension), and knowledge-based action (e.g., instrumental, symbolic, and conceptual). The framework integrates concepts from the sociology of science in particular, and serves as a guide to further comprehensive understanding of knowledge exchange and mobilization in conservation and sustainable natural resource management.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12857-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Un Mapa para el Intercambio del Conocimiento y la Movilización de la Investigación en la Conservación y el Manejo de Recursos Naturales</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12857-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Durante mucho tiempo, los investigadores de todas las disciplinas se han interesado en cómo se mueve el conocimiento dentro y más allá de sus comunidades de pares. Los cambios ambientales rápidos y el llamado por prácticas sustentables de manejo significan que el mejor conocimiento posible es necesario para informar las decisiones, políticas y prácticas para proteger a la biodiversidad y para manejar sustentablemente los recursos naturales vulnerables. Aunque la literatura de conservación sobre el intercambio de conocimiento (IC) y la movilización del conocimiento (MC) ha aumentado en años recientes, la mayor parte está basada en estudios de caso específicos para un contexto. Esto presenta un reto para aprender lecciones acumulativas a partir de la investigación del IC y la MC y así utilizar efectivamente el conocimiento en la conservación y el manejo de recursos naturales. Aunque la investigación continua acerca del vacío entre el conocimiento y la acción es valiosa, ahora se requieren marcos de trabajo conceptuales globales para permitir resúmenes y comparaciones entre diversas investigaciones de IC-MC. Proponemos un marco de trabajo de conocimiento-acción que proporcione un mapa conceptual para las próximas investigaciones y prácticas de IC/MC con miras a sintetizar las lecciones aprendidas de los estudios de caso contextuales y a guiar el desarrollo y la prueba de hipótesis en este dominio. Nuestro marco de trabajo conocimiento-acción tiene tres elementos que suceden en niveles y escalas múltiples: producción de conocimiento (p. ej.: academia, gobierno), mediación del conocimiento (p. ej.: redes de conocimiento, actores, dimensión relacional, dimensión contextual) y acción basada en el conocimiento (p. ej.: instrumental, simbólica y conceptual). El marco de trabajo integra conceptos de la sociología de la ciencia en particular, y sirve como guía para aumentar el entendimiento comprehensivo del intercambio y la movilización del conocimiento en la conservación y el manejo sustentable de los recursos naturales.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Scholars across all disciplines have long been interested in how knowledge moves within and beyond their community of peers. Rapid environmental changes and calls for sustainable management practices mean the best knowledge possible is needed to inform decisions, policies, and practices to protect biodiversity and sustainably manage vulnerable natural resources. Although the conservation literature on knowledge exchange (KE) and knowledge mobilization (KM) has grown in recent years, much of it is based on context-specific case studies. This presents a challenge for learning cumulative lessons from KE and KM research and thus effectively using knowledge in conservation and natural resources management. Although continued research on the gap between knowledge and action is valuable, overarching conceptual frameworks are now needed to enable summaries and comparisons across diverse KE-KM research. We propose a knowledge-action framework that provides a conceptual roadmap for future research and practice in KE/KM with the aim of synthesizing lessons learned from contextual case studies and guiding the development and testing of hypotheses in this domain. Our knowledge-action framework has 3 elements that occur at multiple levels and scales: knowledge production (e.g., academia and government), knowledge mediation (e.g., knowledge networks, actors, relational dimension, and contextual dimension), and knowledge-based action (e.g., instrumental, symbolic, and conceptual). The framework integrates concepts from the sociology of science in particular, and serves as a guide to further comprehensive understanding of knowledge exchange and mobilization in conservation and sustainable natural resource management.


Un Mapa para el Intercambio del Conocimiento y la Movilización de la Investigación en la Conservación y el Manejo de Recursos Naturales

Resumen
Durante mucho tiempo, los investigadores de todas las disciplinas se han interesado en cómo se mueve el conocimiento dentro y más allá de sus comunidades de pares. Los cambios ambientales rápidos y el llamado por prácticas sustentables de manejo significan que el mejor conocimiento posible es necesario para informar las decisiones, políticas y prácticas para proteger a la biodiversidad y para manejar sustentablemente los recursos naturales vulnerables. Aunque la literatura de conservación sobre el intercambio de conocimiento (IC) y la movilización del conocimiento (MC) ha aumentado en años recientes, la mayor parte está basada en estudios de caso específicos para un contexto. Esto presenta un reto para aprender lecciones acumulativas a partir de la investigación del IC y la MC y así utilizar efectivamente el conocimiento en la conservación y el manejo de recursos naturales. Aunque la investigación continua acerca del vacío entre el conocimiento y la acción es valiosa, ahora se requieren marcos de trabajo conceptuales globales para permitir resúmenes y comparaciones entre diversas investigaciones de IC-MC. Proponemos un marco de trabajo de conocimiento-acción que proporcione un mapa conceptual para las próximas investigaciones y prácticas de IC/MC con miras a sintetizar las lecciones aprendidas de los estudios de caso contextuales y a guiar el desarrollo y la prueba de hipótesis en este dominio. Nuestro marco de trabajo conocimiento-acción tiene tres elementos que suceden en niveles y escalas múltiples: producción de conocimiento (p. ej.: academia, gobierno), mediación del conocimiento (p. ej.: redes de conocimiento, actores, dimensión relacional, dimensión contextual) y acción basada en el conocimiento (p. ej.: instrumental, simbólica y conceptual). El marco de trabajo integra conceptos de la sociología de la ciencia en particular, y sirve como guía para aumentar el entendimiento comprehensivo del intercambio y la movilización del conocimiento en la conservación y el manejo sustentable de los recursos naturales.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12873" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of economics and demographics on global fisheries sustainability</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12873</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of economics and demographics on global fisheries sustainability</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Qi Ding, Yali Wang, Xinjun Chen, Yong Chen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-29T16:55:25.801995-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12873</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12873</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12873</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">799</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">808</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A good understanding of social factors that lead to marine ecological change is important to developing sustainable global fisheries. We used balanced panel models and conducted cross-national time-series analyses (1970–2010) of 122 nations to examine how economic prosperity and population growth affected the sustainability of marine ecosystems. We used catches in economic exclusive zone (EEZ); mean trophic level of fishery landings (MTL); primary production required to sustain catches (expressed as percentage of local primary production [%PPR]); and an index of ecosystem overfishing (i.e., the loss in secondary production index [L index]) as indicators of ecological change in marine ecosystems. The EEZ catch, %PPR, and L index declined gradually after gross domestic product (GDP) per capita reached $15,000, $14,000, and $19,000, respectively, and MTL increased steadily once GDP per capita exceeded $20,000. These relationships suggest that economic growth and biodiversity conservation are compatible goals. However, increasing human populations would degrade marine ecosystems. Specifically, a doubling of human population caused an increase in the %PPR of 17.1% and in the L index of 0.0254 and a decline in the MTL of 0.176. A 1% increase in human population resulted in a 0.744% increase in EEZ catch. These results highlight the importance of considering social and economic factors in developing sustainable fisheries management policy.</p></div>
<div class="section" id="cobi12873-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Los Efectos de la Economía y la Demografía sobre la Sustentabilidad de las Pesquerías Globales</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12873-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Un buen entendimiento de los factores sociales que han llevado al cambio en la ecología marina es necesario para las pesquerías sustentables globales en desarrollo. Utilizamos modelos de panel balanceado y realizamos análisis de series de tiempo entre naciones (1970 – 2010) de 122 países para examinar el efecto de la prosperidad económica y el crecimiento poblacional sobre la sustentabilidad de los ecosistemas marinos. Utilizamos capturas en la Zona Económica Exclusiva (ZEE); el nivel trófico medio de las tomas de tierra de las pesquerías (NTM); la producción primaria requerida para sustentar las capturas (expresada como el porcentaje de la producción primaria local [%PPR]); y un índice de sobrepesca de ecosistema (es decir, la pérdida en el índice de producción secundaria [índice L]) como indicadores del cambio ecológico en los ecosistemas marinos. La captura en la ZEE, el %PPR, y el índice L declinaron gradualmente después de que el producto interno bruto (PIB) per cápita alcanzara los $15,000, $14,000, y $19,000, respectivamente; y el NTM incrementó constantemente una vez que el PIB per cápita excedió los $20,000. Estas relaciones sugieren que el crecimiento económico y la conservación de la biodiversidad son objetivos compatibles. Sin embargo, las poblaciones humanas crecientes degradarían los ecosistemas marinos. Específicamente, una duplicación de la población humana causó un incrementó en el %PPR del 17.1 % y en el índice L de 0.0254, y una declinación en el NTM de 0.176. Un incremento del 1 % en la población humana resultó en un incremento del 0.744 % en la captura en la ZEE. Estos resultados resaltan la importancia de considerar los factores sociales y económicos en el desarrollo de políticas de manejo de pesquerías sustentables.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

A good understanding of social factors that lead to marine ecological change is important to developing sustainable global fisheries. We used balanced panel models and conducted cross-national time-series analyses (1970–2010) of 122 nations to examine how economic prosperity and population growth affected the sustainability of marine ecosystems. We used catches in economic exclusive zone (EEZ); mean trophic level of fishery landings (MTL); primary production required to sustain catches (expressed as percentage of local primary production [%PPR]); and an index of ecosystem overfishing (i.e., the loss in secondary production index [L index]) as indicators of ecological change in marine ecosystems. The EEZ catch, %PPR, and L index declined gradually after gross domestic product (GDP) per capita reached $15,000, $14,000, and $19,000, respectively, and MTL increased steadily once GDP per capita exceeded $20,000. These relationships suggest that economic growth and biodiversity conservation are compatible goals. However, increasing human populations would degrade marine ecosystems. Specifically, a doubling of human population caused an increase in the %PPR of 17.1% and in the L index of 0.0254 and a decline in the MTL of 0.176. A 1% increase in human population resulted in a 0.744% increase in EEZ catch. These results highlight the importance of considering social and economic factors in developing sustainable fisheries management policy.

Los Efectos de la Economía y la Demografía sobre la Sustentabilidad de las Pesquerías Globales

Resumen
Un buen entendimiento de los factores sociales que han llevado al cambio en la ecología marina es necesario para las pesquerías sustentables globales en desarrollo. Utilizamos modelos de panel balanceado y realizamos análisis de series de tiempo entre naciones (1970 – 2010) de 122 países para examinar el efecto de la prosperidad económica y el crecimiento poblacional sobre la sustentabilidad de los ecosistemas marinos. Utilizamos capturas en la Zona Económica Exclusiva (ZEE); el nivel trófico medio de las tomas de tierra de las pesquerías (NTM); la producción primaria requerida para sustentar las capturas (expresada como el porcentaje de la producción primaria local [%PPR]); y un índice de sobrepesca de ecosistema (es decir, la pérdida en el índice de producción secundaria [índice L]) como indicadores del cambio ecológico en los ecosistemas marinos. La captura en la ZEE, el %PPR, y el índice L declinaron gradualmente después de que el producto interno bruto (PIB) per cápita alcanzara los $15,000, $14,000, y $19,000, respectivamente; y el NTM incrementó constantemente una vez que el PIB per cápita excedió los $20,000. Estas relaciones sugieren que el crecimiento económico y la conservación de la biodiversidad son objetivos compatibles. Sin embargo, las poblaciones humanas crecientes degradarían los ecosistemas marinos. Específicamente, una duplicación de la población humana causó un incrementó en el %PPR del 17.1 % y en el índice L de 0.0254, y una declinación en el NTM de 0.176. Un incremento del 1 % en la población humana resultó en un incremento del 0.744 % en la captura en la ZEE. Estos resultados resaltan la importancia de considerar los factores sociales y económicos en el desarrollo de políticas de manejo de pesquerías sustentables.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12916" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Testing the feasibility of a hypothetical whaling-conservation permit market in Norway</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12916</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Testing the feasibility of a hypothetical whaling-conservation permit market in Norway</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Biao Huang, Joshua K. Abbott, Eli P. Fenichel, Rachata Muneepeerakul, Charles Perrings, Leah R. Gerber</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-06T05:01:06.100109-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12916</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12916</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12916</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">809</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">817</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A cap-and-trade system for managing whale harvests represents a potentially useful approach to resolve the current gridlock in international whale management. The establishment of whale permit markets, open to both whalers and conservationists, could reveal the strength of conservation demand, about which little is known. This lack of knowledge makes it difficult to predict the outcome of a hypothetical whale permit market. We developed a bioeconomic model to evaluate the influence of economic uncertainty about demand for whale conservation or harvest. We used simulations over a wide range of parameterizations of whaling and conservation demands to examine the potential ecological consequences of the establishment of a whale permit market in Norwegian waters under bounded (but substantial) economic uncertainty. Uncertainty variables were slope of whaling and conservation demand, participation level of conservationists and their willingness to pay for whale conservation, and functional forms of demand, including linear, quadratic, and log-linear forms. A whale-conservation market had the potential to yield a wide range of conservation and harvest outcomes, the most likely outcomes were those in which conservationists bought all whale permits.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12916-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>SPrueba de la Viabilidad de un Mercado Hipotético de Permisos de Caza de Ballenas y Conservación en Noruega</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12916-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Un sistema de compra de derechos de emisión para manejar la caza de ballenas representa una estrategia potencialmente útil para resolver la paralización actual en el manejo internacional de las ballenas. El establecimiento de un mercado de permisos de caza, disponibles tanto para balleneros como para conservacionistas, podría develar la fuerza de la demanda de conservación, de la cual se sabe poco. Esta falta de conocimiento dificulta la predicción del resultado de un mercado hipotético de permisos de caza de ballenas. Desarrollamos un modelo bioeconómico para evaluar la influencia de la incertidumbre económica en la demanda de la conservación o caza de ballenas. Utilizamos simulaciones a lo largo de una gama extensa de parámetros de la demanda de la caza de ballenas y de la conservación para examinar las potenciales consecuencias ecológicas del establecimiento de un mercado de permisos de caza en aguas noruegas bajo una incertidumbre económica restringida (pero sustancial). Las variables de incertidumbre fueron la pendiente de la caza de ballenas y de la demanda de la conservación, el nivel de participación de los conservacionistas y su disposición a pagar por la conservación de las ballenas, y las formas funcionales de la demanda, incluyendo las formas lineales, cuadráticas y log-lineales. Un mercado de caza y conservación de ballenas tuvo el potencial de producir una amplia gama de resultados para la conservación y la caza, y los resultados más probables son aquellos en los que los conservacionistas compraron todos los permisos.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

A cap-and-trade system for managing whale harvests represents a potentially useful approach to resolve the current gridlock in international whale management. The establishment of whale permit markets, open to both whalers and conservationists, could reveal the strength of conservation demand, about which little is known. This lack of knowledge makes it difficult to predict the outcome of a hypothetical whale permit market. We developed a bioeconomic model to evaluate the influence of economic uncertainty about demand for whale conservation or harvest. We used simulations over a wide range of parameterizations of whaling and conservation demands to examine the potential ecological consequences of the establishment of a whale permit market in Norwegian waters under bounded (but substantial) economic uncertainty. Uncertainty variables were slope of whaling and conservation demand, participation level of conservationists and their willingness to pay for whale conservation, and functional forms of demand, including linear, quadratic, and log-linear forms. A whale-conservation market had the potential to yield a wide range of conservation and harvest outcomes, the most likely outcomes were those in which conservationists bought all whale permits.


SPrueba de la Viabilidad de un Mercado Hipotético de Permisos de Caza de Ballenas y Conservación en Noruega

Resumen
Un sistema de compra de derechos de emisión para manejar la caza de ballenas representa una estrategia potencialmente útil para resolver la paralización actual en el manejo internacional de las ballenas. El establecimiento de un mercado de permisos de caza, disponibles tanto para balleneros como para conservacionistas, podría develar la fuerza de la demanda de conservación, de la cual se sabe poco. Esta falta de conocimiento dificulta la predicción del resultado de un mercado hipotético de permisos de caza de ballenas. Desarrollamos un modelo bioeconómico para evaluar la influencia de la incertidumbre económica en la demanda de la conservación o caza de ballenas. Utilizamos simulaciones a lo largo de una gama extensa de parámetros de la demanda de la caza de ballenas y de la conservación para examinar las potenciales consecuencias ecológicas del establecimiento de un mercado de permisos de caza en aguas noruegas bajo una incertidumbre económica restringida (pero sustancial). Las variables de incertidumbre fueron la pendiente de la caza de ballenas y de la demanda de la conservación, el nivel de participación de los conservacionistas y su disposición a pagar por la conservación de las ballenas, y las formas funcionales de la demanda, incluyendo las formas lineales, cuadráticas y log-lineales. Un mercado de caza y conservación de ballenas tuvo el potencial de producir una amplia gama de resultados para la conservación y la caza, y los resultados más probables son aquellos en los que los conservacionistas compraron todos los permisos.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12849" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12849</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rochelle Steven, James C. R. Smart, Clare Morrison, J. Guy Castley</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-29T04:24:02.853442-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12849</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12849</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12849</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">818</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">827</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Conservation of biodiversity, including birds, continues to challenge natural-area managers. Stated-preference methods (e.g., choice experiment [CE]) are increasingly used to provide data for valuation of natural ecosystems. We used a CE to calculate birders’ willingness to pay for different levels of bioecological attributes (threatened species, endemic species, and diversity) of birding sites with hypothetical entry fees. The CE was delivered at popular birding and avitourism sites in Australia and the United Kingdom. Latent-class modeling results revealed heterogeneous preferences among birders and correspondingly variable willingness to pay. Four clear groups were apparent: quantity-driven birders, special-birds seekers, confused respondents, and price-is-no-object birders. Quantity-driven birders were attracted to sites that deliver high levels of diversity and endemic species for which they were willing to pay $135 and $66 to visit, respectively, above what they were willing to pay to visit a site with low levels of diversity and few endemic and threatened species . Special-bird seekers valued threatened species and high levels of endemic species most (willingness to pay $45 and $46, respectively). Confused respondents’ preferences were difficult to determine, but they were the most sensitive to the hypothetical entry fees, unlike the price-is-no-object birders, who were not at all sensitive to cost. Our findings demonstrate that birders are amenable to paying for their preferred birding experience. These payments could provide an alternative source of funding in some avitourism sites on both public and private land. Such alternative revenue streams should be explored and given full consideration in increasingly competitive conservation-financing environments.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12849-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Uso de un Experimento de Opción y las Preferencias de Observadores de Aves para Guiar el Financiamiento de la Conservación de Aves</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12849-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La conservación de la biodiversidad, incluyendo a las aves, sigue siendo un reto para quienes manejan las áreas naturales. Los métodos de preferencia manifestada (p.ej.: el experimento de opción [EO]) cada vez se usan más para proporcionar datos para la valoración de los ecosistemas naturales. Utilizamos un EO para calcular la disposición de observadores de aves para pagar por diferentes niveles de atributos bioecológicos (especies amenazadas, especies endémicas y diversidad) de los sitios de observación de aves con cuotas de admisión hipotéticas. El EO fue llevado a cabo en sitios populares para la observación de aves y el aviturismo en Australia y el Reino Unido. Los resultados de modelado de clase latente revelaron preferencias heterogéneas entre los observadores de aves y una correspondiente disposición para pagar variable. Cuatro grupos claros fueron aparentes: los observadores de aves llevados por la cantidad, buscadores de aves en especial, respondientes confundidos y observadores de aves para los que el precio no es un objeto. Los observadores de aves llevados por la cantidad estuvieron interesados por los sitios que presentan niveles altos de diversidad y especies endémicas, por lo que estarían dispuestos a pagar $135 y $66 por visita, respectivamente, por encima de lo que estarían dispuestos a pagar por visitar un sitio con niveles bajos de diversidad y pocas especies amenazadas o endémicas. Los buscadores de aves en especial valoraron más a las especies amenazadas y a los niveles altos de especies endémicas (disposición para pagar $45 y $46, respectivamente). Las preferencias de los respondientes confundidos fueron difíciles de determinar, pero también fueron los más sensibles a las cuotas de entrada hipotéticas, a diferencia de los observadores para los que el precio no es un objeto, quienes no fueron para nada sensibles al costo. Nuestros hallazgos demuestran que los observadores de aves están dispuestos a pagar por su experiencia de observación preferida. Estos pagos podrían proporcionar una fuente de financiamiento alternativa en algunos sitios de aviturismo, tanto en terrenos privados como públicos. Tales fuentes alternativas de ingresos deberían ser exploradas y consideradas plenamente en los ambientes cada vez más competitivos de financiamiento para la conservación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Conservation of biodiversity, including birds, continues to challenge natural-area managers. Stated-preference methods (e.g., choice experiment [CE]) are increasingly used to provide data for valuation of natural ecosystems. We used a CE to calculate birders’ willingness to pay for different levels of bioecological attributes (threatened species, endemic species, and diversity) of birding sites with hypothetical entry fees. The CE was delivered at popular birding and avitourism sites in Australia and the United Kingdom. Latent-class modeling results revealed heterogeneous preferences among birders and correspondingly variable willingness to pay. Four clear groups were apparent: quantity-driven birders, special-birds seekers, confused respondents, and price-is-no-object birders. Quantity-driven birders were attracted to sites that deliver high levels of diversity and endemic species for which they were willing to pay $135 and $66 to visit, respectively, above what they were willing to pay to visit a site with low levels of diversity and few endemic and threatened species . Special-bird seekers valued threatened species and high levels of endemic species most (willingness to pay $45 and $46, respectively). Confused respondents’ preferences were difficult to determine, but they were the most sensitive to the hypothetical entry fees, unlike the price-is-no-object birders, who were not at all sensitive to cost. Our findings demonstrate that birders are amenable to paying for their preferred birding experience. These payments could provide an alternative source of funding in some avitourism sites on both public and private land. Such alternative revenue streams should be explored and given full consideration in increasingly competitive conservation-financing environments.


El Uso de un Experimento de Opción y las Preferencias de Observadores de Aves para Guiar el Financiamiento de la Conservación de Aves

Resumen
La conservación de la biodiversidad, incluyendo a las aves, sigue siendo un reto para quienes manejan las áreas naturales. Los métodos de preferencia manifestada (p.ej.: el experimento de opción [EO]) cada vez se usan más para proporcionar datos para la valoración de los ecosistemas naturales. Utilizamos un EO para calcular la disposición de observadores de aves para pagar por diferentes niveles de atributos bioecológicos (especies amenazadas, especies endémicas y diversidad) de los sitios de observación de aves con cuotas de admisión hipotéticas. El EO fue llevado a cabo en sitios populares para la observación de aves y el aviturismo en Australia y el Reino Unido. Los resultados de modelado de clase latente revelaron preferencias heterogéneas entre los observadores de aves y una correspondiente disposición para pagar variable. Cuatro grupos claros fueron aparentes: los observadores de aves llevados por la cantidad, buscadores de aves en especial, respondientes confundidos y observadores de aves para los que el precio no es un objeto. Los observadores de aves llevados por la cantidad estuvieron interesados por los sitios que presentan niveles altos de diversidad y especies endémicas, por lo que estarían dispuestos a pagar $135 y $66 por visita, respectivamente, por encima de lo que estarían dispuestos a pagar por visitar un sitio con niveles bajos de diversidad y pocas especies amenazadas o endémicas. Los buscadores de aves en especial valoraron más a las especies amenazadas y a los niveles altos de especies endémicas (disposición para pagar $45 y $46, respectivamente). Las preferencias de los respondientes confundidos fueron difíciles de determinar, pero también fueron los más sensibles a las cuotas de entrada hipotéticas, a diferencia de los observadores para los que el precio no es un objeto, quienes no fueron para nada sensibles al costo. Nuestros hallazgos demuestran que los observadores de aves están dispuestos a pagar por su experiencia de observación preferida. Estos pagos podrían proporcionar una fuente de financiamiento alternativa en algunos sitios de aviturismo, tanto en terrenos privados como públicos. Tales fuentes alternativas de ingresos deberían ser exploradas y consideradas plenamente en los ambientes cada vez más competitivos de financiamiento para la conservación.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12874" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Social preferences for the design of biodiversity offsets for shorebirds in Australia</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12874</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Social preferences for the design of biodiversity offsets for shorebirds in Australia</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abbie A. Rogers, Michael P. Burton</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-29T16:50:27.04509-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12874</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12874</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12874</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">828</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">836</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Understanding the social acceptability of biodiversity offsets is important to the design of offset policy. We used a discrete choice experiment to quantify preferences of Australians for a migratory shorebird offset in the context of an oil and gas development project. We surveyed a nationally representative sample of 1371 respondents on their preferences for current and prospective offset-policy characteristics via an online questionnaire to inform policy design of the social dimensions related to offset acceptability. The majority of respondents accepted offsetting as a means to allow economic development; the option to reject development (and an offset) was selected in 13% of possible offset scenarios. Substituting protection of a species affected by the development with protection of a more endangered species was a desirable policy characteristic, as was having the offset implemented by a third party or the government rather than the company responsible for the development. Direct offset activities (e.g., improving degraded habitat) were preferred over indirect activities (e.g., a research program), and respondents were strongly against locating the offset at a site other than where the impact occurred. Positive and negative characteristics of offsets could be traded off by changing the number of birds protected by the offset. Our results show that Australians are likely to support increased flexibility in biodiversity-offset policies, particularly when undesirable policy characteristics are compensated for.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12874-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Preferencias Sociales para el Diseño de Compensaciones de Biodiversidad para las Aves Costeras en Australia</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12874-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Entender la aceptabilidad social de las compensaciones de la biodiversidad es importante para diseñar una política de compensaciones. Utilizamos un experimento de opción discreta para cuantificar las preferencias de los australianos por una compensación de aves costeras migratorias en el contexto de un proyecto de desarrollo de gas y petróleo. Encuestamos una muestra representativa nacionalmente de 1371 respondientes sobre sus preferencias por las características actuales y futuras de la política de compensaciones por medio de un cuestionario en línea para informar al diseño de la política sobre las dimensiones sociales relacionadas con la aceptabilidad de la compensación. La mayoría de los respondientes aceptaron la compensación como un medio para permitir el desarrollo económico; la opción de rechazar el desarrollo de gas y petróleo (y una compensación) fue seleccionada en 13 % de los posibles escenarios de compensación. Sustituir la protección de una especie afectada por el desarrollo con la protección de más especies en peligro fue una característica deseable de la política, así como la implementación de la compensación por parte de un tercero o el gobierno en lugar de la compañía responsable del desarrollo. Las actividades directas de compensación (p. ej.: mejor el hábitat degradado) fueron preferidas por encima de las actividades indirectas (p. ej.: un programa de investigación) y los respondientes estuvieron ampliamente en contra de ubicar a la compensación en un sitio distinto a donde ocurre el impacto. Las características positivas y negativas de las compensaciones podrían intercambiarse modificando el número de aves protegidas por la compensación. Nuestros resultados muestran que los australianos probablemente apoyen un incremento en la flexibilidad de las políticas de compensación de la biodiversidad, particularmente cuando se compensan las características indeseables de la política.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Understanding the social acceptability of biodiversity offsets is important to the design of offset policy. We used a discrete choice experiment to quantify preferences of Australians for a migratory shorebird offset in the context of an oil and gas development project. We surveyed a nationally representative sample of 1371 respondents on their preferences for current and prospective offset-policy characteristics via an online questionnaire to inform policy design of the social dimensions related to offset acceptability. The majority of respondents accepted offsetting as a means to allow economic development; the option to reject development (and an offset) was selected in 13% of possible offset scenarios. Substituting protection of a species affected by the development with protection of a more endangered species was a desirable policy characteristic, as was having the offset implemented by a third party or the government rather than the company responsible for the development. Direct offset activities (e.g., improving degraded habitat) were preferred over indirect activities (e.g., a research program), and respondents were strongly against locating the offset at a site other than where the impact occurred. Positive and negative characteristics of offsets could be traded off by changing the number of birds protected by the offset. Our results show that Australians are likely to support increased flexibility in biodiversity-offset policies, particularly when undesirable policy characteristics are compensated for.


Preferencias Sociales para el Diseño de Compensaciones de Biodiversidad para las Aves Costeras en Australia

Resumen
Entender la aceptabilidad social de las compensaciones de la biodiversidad es importante para diseñar una política de compensaciones. Utilizamos un experimento de opción discreta para cuantificar las preferencias de los australianos por una compensación de aves costeras migratorias en el contexto de un proyecto de desarrollo de gas y petróleo. Encuestamos una muestra representativa nacionalmente de 1371 respondientes sobre sus preferencias por las características actuales y futuras de la política de compensaciones por medio de un cuestionario en línea para informar al diseño de la política sobre las dimensiones sociales relacionadas con la aceptabilidad de la compensación. La mayoría de los respondientes aceptaron la compensación como un medio para permitir el desarrollo económico; la opción de rechazar el desarrollo de gas y petróleo (y una compensación) fue seleccionada en 13 % de los posibles escenarios de compensación. Sustituir la protección de una especie afectada por el desarrollo con la protección de más especies en peligro fue una característica deseable de la política, así como la implementación de la compensación por parte de un tercero o el gobierno en lugar de la compañía responsable del desarrollo. Las actividades directas de compensación (p. ej.: mejor el hábitat degradado) fueron preferidas por encima de las actividades indirectas (p. ej.: un programa de investigación) y los respondientes estuvieron ampliamente en contra de ubicar a la compensación en un sitio distinto a donde ocurre el impacto. Las características positivas y negativas de las compensaciones podrían intercambiarse modificando el número de aves protegidas por la compensación. Nuestros resultados muestran que los australianos probablemente apoyen un incremento en la flexibilidad de las políticas de compensación de la biodiversidad, particularmente cuando se compensan las características indeseables de la política.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12886" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12886</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cassandra M. Robillard, Jeremy T. Kerr</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-07-12T10:59:44.02935-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12886</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12886</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12886</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">837</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">847</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>High costs of land in agricultural regions warrant spatial prioritization approaches to conservation that explicitly consider land prices to produce protected-area networks that accomplish targets efficiently. However, land-use changes in such regions and delays between plan design and implementation may render optimized plans obsolete before implementation occurs. To measure the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans, we simulated a land-acquisition and restoration initiative aimed at conserving species at risk in Canada's farmlands. We accounted for observed changes in land-acquisition costs and in agricultural intensity based on censuses of agriculture taken from 1986 to 2011. For each year of data, we mapped costs and areas of conservation priority designated using Marxan. We compared plans to test for changes through time in the arrangement of high-priority sites and in the total cost of each plan. For acquisition costs, we measured the savings from accounting for prices during site selection. Land-acquisition costs and land-use intensity generally rose over time independent of inflation (24–78%), although rates of change were heterogeneous through space and decreased in some areas. Accounting for spatial variation in land price lowered the cost of conservation plans by 1.73–13.9%, decreased the range of costs by 19–82%, and created unique solutions from which to choose. Despite the rise in plan costs over time, the high conservation priority of particular areas remained consistent. Delaying conservation in these critical areas may compromise what optimized conservation plans can achieve. In the case of Canadian farmland, rapid conservation action is cost-effective, even with moderate levels of uncertainty in how to implement restoration goals.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12886-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Valoración de la Vida de Anaquel de los Planes de Conservación Rentables para Especies en Riesgo a lo largo de Gradientes de Uso de Suelo Agrícola</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12886-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los altos costos de las tierras en las regiones agrícolas garantizan estrategias de priorización espacial que consideran explícitamente los precios de suelo para producir redes de áreas protegidas que cumplan eficientemente con los objetivos. Sin embargo, los cambios en el uso de suelo en dichas regiones y los retrasos entre el diseño del plan y la implementación pueden volver obsoletos a los planes optimizados antes de que ocurra la implementación. Para medir la vida de anaquel de los planes de conservación rentables, simulamos una iniciativa de adquisición y restauración de suelo con miras a la conservación de especies en riesgo en las tierras de cultivo canadienses. Tomamos en cuenta los cambios observados en los costos de adquisición de suelo y en la intensidad agrícola con base en los censos de agricultura hechos desde 1986 hasta 2011. Para cada año de datos, mapeamos con el uso de Marxan los costos y las áreas de prioridad de conservación designadas. Comparamos los planes para analizar los cambios a través del tiempo en el arreglo de los sitios de alta prioridad y en el costo total de cada plan. Para los costos de adquisición medimos los ahorros a partir de la consideración de los precios durante la selección de sitio. Los costos de adquisición de suelo y la intensidad de uso de suelo en general aumentaron con el tiempo sin importar la inflación (24-78%), aunque las tasas de cambio fueron heterogéneas a lo largo del espacio y disminuyeron en algunas áreas. La consideración de la variación espacial en el precio del suelo redujo el costo de los planes de conservación en un 1.73-13.9%, disminuyó la gama de costos en un 19–82%, y creó soluciones únicas para elegir. A pesar del alza en los costos de los planes con el tiempo, la alta prioridad de conservación de las áreas particulares permanecieron consistentes. El retraso de la conservación en estas áreas críticas puede comprometer lo que los planes de conservación optimizados pueden lograr. En el caso de las tierras de cultivo canadienses, la acción rápida de conservación es rentable, incluso con niveles moderados de incertidumbre sobre cómo implementar los objetivos de restauración.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

High costs of land in agricultural regions warrant spatial prioritization approaches to conservation that explicitly consider land prices to produce protected-area networks that accomplish targets efficiently. However, land-use changes in such regions and delays between plan design and implementation may render optimized plans obsolete before implementation occurs. To measure the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans, we simulated a land-acquisition and restoration initiative aimed at conserving species at risk in Canada's farmlands. We accounted for observed changes in land-acquisition costs and in agricultural intensity based on censuses of agriculture taken from 1986 to 2011. For each year of data, we mapped costs and areas of conservation priority designated using Marxan. We compared plans to test for changes through time in the arrangement of high-priority sites and in the total cost of each plan. For acquisition costs, we measured the savings from accounting for prices during site selection. Land-acquisition costs and land-use intensity generally rose over time independent of inflation (24–78%), although rates of change were heterogeneous through space and decreased in some areas. Accounting for spatial variation in land price lowered the cost of conservation plans by 1.73–13.9%, decreased the range of costs by 19–82%, and created unique solutions from which to choose. Despite the rise in plan costs over time, the high conservation priority of particular areas remained consistent. Delaying conservation in these critical areas may compromise what optimized conservation plans can achieve. In the case of Canadian farmland, rapid conservation action is cost-effective, even with moderate levels of uncertainty in how to implement restoration goals.


Valoración de la Vida de Anaquel de los Planes de Conservación Rentables para Especies en Riesgo a lo largo de Gradientes de Uso de Suelo Agrícola

Resumen
Los altos costos de las tierras en las regiones agrícolas garantizan estrategias de priorización espacial que consideran explícitamente los precios de suelo para producir redes de áreas protegidas que cumplan eficientemente con los objetivos. Sin embargo, los cambios en el uso de suelo en dichas regiones y los retrasos entre el diseño del plan y la implementación pueden volver obsoletos a los planes optimizados antes de que ocurra la implementación. Para medir la vida de anaquel de los planes de conservación rentables, simulamos una iniciativa de adquisición y restauración de suelo con miras a la conservación de especies en riesgo en las tierras de cultivo canadienses. Tomamos en cuenta los cambios observados en los costos de adquisición de suelo y en la intensidad agrícola con base en los censos de agricultura hechos desde 1986 hasta 2011. Para cada año de datos, mapeamos con el uso de Marxan los costos y las áreas de prioridad de conservación designadas. Comparamos los planes para analizar los cambios a través del tiempo en el arreglo de los sitios de alta prioridad y en el costo total de cada plan. Para los costos de adquisición medimos los ahorros a partir de la consideración de los precios durante la selección de sitio. Los costos de adquisición de suelo y la intensidad de uso de suelo en general aumentaron con el tiempo sin importar la inflación (24-78%), aunque las tasas de cambio fueron heterogéneas a lo largo del espacio y disminuyeron en algunas áreas. La consideración de la variación espacial en el precio del suelo redujo el costo de los planes de conservación en un 1.73-13.9%, disminuyó la gama de costos en un 19–82%, y creó soluciones únicas para elegir. A pesar del alza en los costos de los planes con el tiempo, la alta prioridad de conservación de las áreas particulares permanecieron consistentes. El retraso de la conservación en estas áreas críticas puede comprometer lo que los planes de conservación optimizados pueden lograr. En el caso de las tierras de cultivo canadienses, la acción rápida de conservación es rentable, incluso con niveles moderados de incertidumbre sobre cómo implementar los objetivos de restauración.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12909" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effectiveness of conservation easements in agricultural regions</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12909</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effectiveness of conservation easements in agricultural regions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Braza</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-06-21T14:35:33.153845-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12909</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12909</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12909</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">848</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">859</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Conservation easements are a standard technique for preventing habitat loss, particularly in agricultural regions with extensive cropland cultivation, yet little is known about their effectiveness. I developed a spatial econometric approach to propensity-score matching and used the approach to estimate the amount of habitat loss prevented by a grassland conservation easement program of the U.S. federal government. I used a spatial autoregressive probit model to predict tract enrollment in the easement program as of 2001 based on tract agricultural suitability, habitat quality, and spatial interactions among neighboring tracts. Using the predicted values from the model, I matched enrolled tracts with similar unenrolled tracts to form a treatment group and a control group. To measure the program's impact on subsequent grassland loss, I estimated cropland cultivation rates for both groups in 2014 with a second spatial probit model. Between 2001 and 2014, approximately 14.9% of control tracts were cultivated and 0.3% of treated tracts were cultivated. Therefore, approximately 14.6% of the protected land would have been cultivated in the absence of the program. My results demonstrate that conservation easements can significantly reduce habitat loss in agricultural regions; however, the enrollment of tracts with low cropland suitability may constrain the amount of habitat loss they prevent. My results also show that spatial econometric models can improve the validity of control groups and thereby strengthen causal inferences about program effectiveness in situations when spatial interactions influence conservation decisions.</p></div>
<div class="section" id="cobi12909-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Efectividad de las Servidumbres para la Conservación en las Regiones Agrícolas</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12909-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las servidumbres para la conservación son una técnica estándar para prevenir la pérdida del hábitat, particularmente en las regiones con terrenos de cultivo extensivo, aunque se sabe poco sobre su efectividad. Desarrollé una estrategia espacial econométrica para el emparejamiento por puntaje de tendencia (EPT) y la usé para estimar la cantidad de pérdida de hábitat prevenida por un programa de servidumbre para la conservación de pastizales del gobierno federal de E.U.A. Utilicé un modelo espacial autoregresivo probit para predecir la matriculación de parcelas en el programa de servidumbre a partir del 2001 con base en la idoneidad agrícola de la parcela, la calidad del hábitat y las interacciones espaciales entre parcelas vecinas. Con los valores pronosticados en el modelo, emparejé las parcelas matriculadas con parcelas similares sin matrícula para formar un grupo de tratamiento y un grupo control. Para medir el impacto del programa en la pérdida subsecuente de pastizales, estimé las tasas de cultivo en las tierras de cultivo para ambos grupos en 2014 con un segundo modelo espacial probit. Entre 2001 y 2014, aproximadamente el 14.9% de las parcelas control fueron cultivadas y el 0.3% de las parcelas tratadas fueron cultivadas. Por lo tanto, aproximadamente el 14.6% del suelo protegido habría sido cultivado en ausencia del programa. Mis resultados demuestran que las servidumbres para la conservación pueden reducir significativamente la pérdida del hábitat en las regiones agrícolas; sin embargo, la matriculación de las parcelas con una idoneidad baja para la tierra de cultivo puede restringir la cantidad de pérdida de hábitat que previenen. Mis resultados también muestran que los modelos espaciales econométricos pueden mejorar la validez de los grupos control, y por lo tanto fortalecer las inferencias causales acerca de la efectividad del programa en situaciones en las que las interacciones espaciales influyen sobre las decisiones de conservación.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Conservation easements are a standard technique for preventing habitat loss, particularly in agricultural regions with extensive cropland cultivation, yet little is known about their effectiveness. I developed a spatial econometric approach to propensity-score matching and used the approach to estimate the amount of habitat loss prevented by a grassland conservation easement program of the U.S. federal government. I used a spatial autoregressive probit model to predict tract enrollment in the easement program as of 2001 based on tract agricultural suitability, habitat quality, and spatial interactions among neighboring tracts. Using the predicted values from the model, I matched enrolled tracts with similar unenrolled tracts to form a treatment group and a control group. To measure the program's impact on subsequent grassland loss, I estimated cropland cultivation rates for both groups in 2014 with a second spatial probit model. Between 2001 and 2014, approximately 14.9% of control tracts were cultivated and 0.3% of treated tracts were cultivated. Therefore, approximately 14.6% of the protected land would have been cultivated in the absence of the program. My results demonstrate that conservation easements can significantly reduce habitat loss in agricultural regions; however, the enrollment of tracts with low cropland suitability may constrain the amount of habitat loss they prevent. My results also show that spatial econometric models can improve the validity of control groups and thereby strengthen causal inferences about program effectiveness in situations when spatial interactions influence conservation decisions.

Efectividad de las Servidumbres para la Conservación en las Regiones Agrícolas

Resumen
Las servidumbres para la conservación son una técnica estándar para prevenir la pérdida del hábitat, particularmente en las regiones con terrenos de cultivo extensivo, aunque se sabe poco sobre su efectividad. Desarrollé una estrategia espacial econométrica para el emparejamiento por puntaje de tendencia (EPT) y la usé para estimar la cantidad de pérdida de hábitat prevenida por un programa de servidumbre para la conservación de pastizales del gobierno federal de E.U.A. Utilicé un modelo espacial autoregresivo probit para predecir la matriculación de parcelas en el programa de servidumbre a partir del 2001 con base en la idoneidad agrícola de la parcela, la calidad del hábitat y las interacciones espaciales entre parcelas vecinas. Con los valores pronosticados en el modelo, emparejé las parcelas matriculadas con parcelas similares sin matrícula para formar un grupo de tratamiento y un grupo control. Para medir el impacto del programa en la pérdida subsecuente de pastizales, estimé las tasas de cultivo en las tierras de cultivo para ambos grupos en 2014 con un segundo modelo espacial probit. Entre 2001 y 2014, aproximadamente el 14.9% de las parcelas control fueron cultivadas y el 0.3% de las parcelas tratadas fueron cultivadas. Por lo tanto, aproximadamente el 14.6% del suelo protegido habría sido cultivado en ausencia del programa. Mis resultados demuestran que las servidumbres para la conservación pueden reducir significativamente la pérdida del hábitat en las regiones agrícolas; sin embargo, la matriculación de las parcelas con una idoneidad baja para la tierra de cultivo puede restringir la cantidad de pérdida de hábitat que previenen. Mis resultados también muestran que los modelos espaciales econométricos pueden mejorar la validez de los grupos control, y por lo tanto fortalecer las inferencias causales acerca de la efectividad del programa en situaciones en las que las interacciones espaciales influyen sobre las decisiones de conservación.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12872" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12872</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Willem Verhagen, Aija S. Kukkala, Atte Moilanen, Astrid J.A. van Teeffelen, Peter H. Verburg</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-20T04:32:39.37097-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12872</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12872</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12872</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">860</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">871</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Policies and research increasingly focus on the protection of ecosystem services (ESs) through priority-area conservation. Priority areas for ESs should be identified based on ES capacity and ES demand and account for the connections between areas of ES capacity and demand (flow) resulting in areas of unique demand–supply connections (flow zones). We tested ways to account for ES demand and flow zones to identify priority areas in the European Union. We mapped the capacity and demand of a global (carbon sequestration), a regional (flood regulation), and 3 local ESs (air quality, pollination, and urban leisure). We used Zonation software to identify priority areas for ESs based on 6 tests: with and without accounting for ES demand and 4 tests that accounted for the effect of ES flow zone. There was only 37.1% overlap between the 25% of priority areas that encompassed the most ESs with and without accounting for ES demand. The level of ESs maintained in the priority areas increased from 23.2% to 57.9% after accounting for ES demand, especially for ESs with a small flow zone. Accounting for flow zone had a small effect on the location of priority areas and level of ESs maintained but resulted in fewer flow zones without ES maintained relative to ignoring flow zones. Accounting for demand and flow zones enhanced representation and distribution of ESs with local to regional flow zones without large trade-offs relative to the global ES. We found that ignoring ES demand led to the identification of priority areas in remote regions where benefits from ES capacity to society were small. Incorporating ESs in conservation planning should therefore always account for ES demand to identify an effective priority network for ESs.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12872-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Uso de la Demanda y el Flujo Espacial de los Servicios Ambientales para Identificar Áreas Prioritarias</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12872-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las políticas y las investigaciones cada vez más se enfocan en la protección de los servicios ambientales (SAs) por medio de la conservación de áreas prioritarias. Las áreas prioritarias para los SAs deberían ser identificadas con base en la capacidad de SAs y la demanda de SAs, y deberían representar las conexiones entre las áreas de capacidad de SAs y la demanda (flujo), resultando así en áreas de conexiones únicas de demanda y suministro (zonas de flujo). Probamos maneras para representar la demanda de SAs y las zonas de flujo para identificar las áreas prioritarias en la Unión Europea. Mapeamos la capacidad y la demanda de un SA global (secuestro de carbono), regional (regulación de inundación), y tres locales (calidad del aire, polinización, y tiempo libre urbano). Usamos el software Zonation para identificar las áreas prioritarias para los SAs con base en seis experimentos: con y sin representación de la demanda de los SAs, y cuatro experimentos que representaron el efecto de la zona de flujo de los SAs. Sólo hubo un traslape de 37.1 % entre el 25 % de las áreas prioritarias que englobaron la mayoría de los SAs con y sin representación de la demanda de SAs. El nivel de los SAs que se mantuvo en las áreas prioritarias incrementó de un 23.2 % a 57.9 % después de considerar la demanda de los SAs, especialmente para aquellos SAs con una zona de flujo reducida. Representar la zona de flujo tuvo un pequeño efecto sobre la ubicación de las áreas prioritarias y el nivel de SAs que se mantuvo, pero resultó en menos zonas de flujo sin SAs mantenidos en relación a ignorar las zonas de flujo. Representar la demanda y las zonas de flujo mejoró la representación y distribución de los SAs con zonas de flujo de regionales a locales sin compensaciones grandes en relación al SA global. Hallamos que ignorar la demanda de SAs llevó a la identificación de las áreas prioritarias en las regiones remotas en donde los beneficios de la capacidad de los SAs para la sociedad fueron pequeños. Incorporar los SAs a la planeación de la conservación por lo tanto debería siempre representar a la demanda de los SAs para identificar una red efectiva de prioridades para los SAs.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Policies and research increasingly focus on the protection of ecosystem services (ESs) through priority-area conservation. Priority areas for ESs should be identified based on ES capacity and ES demand and account for the connections between areas of ES capacity and demand (flow) resulting in areas of unique demand–supply connections (flow zones). We tested ways to account for ES demand and flow zones to identify priority areas in the European Union. We mapped the capacity and demand of a global (carbon sequestration), a regional (flood regulation), and 3 local ESs (air quality, pollination, and urban leisure). We used Zonation software to identify priority areas for ESs based on 6 tests: with and without accounting for ES demand and 4 tests that accounted for the effect of ES flow zone. There was only 37.1% overlap between the 25% of priority areas that encompassed the most ESs with and without accounting for ES demand. The level of ESs maintained in the priority areas increased from 23.2% to 57.9% after accounting for ES demand, especially for ESs with a small flow zone. Accounting for flow zone had a small effect on the location of priority areas and level of ESs maintained but resulted in fewer flow zones without ES maintained relative to ignoring flow zones. Accounting for demand and flow zones enhanced representation and distribution of ESs with local to regional flow zones without large trade-offs relative to the global ES. We found that ignoring ES demand led to the identification of priority areas in remote regions where benefits from ES capacity to society were small. Incorporating ESs in conservation planning should therefore always account for ES demand to identify an effective priority network for ESs.


Uso de la Demanda y el Flujo Espacial de los Servicios Ambientales para Identificar Áreas Prioritarias

Resumen
Las políticas y las investigaciones cada vez más se enfocan en la protección de los servicios ambientales (SAs) por medio de la conservación de áreas prioritarias. Las áreas prioritarias para los SAs deberían ser identificadas con base en la capacidad de SAs y la demanda de SAs, y deberían representar las conexiones entre las áreas de capacidad de SAs y la demanda (flujo), resultando así en áreas de conexiones únicas de demanda y suministro (zonas de flujo). Probamos maneras para representar la demanda de SAs y las zonas de flujo para identificar las áreas prioritarias en la Unión Europea. Mapeamos la capacidad y la demanda de un SA global (secuestro de carbono), regional (regulación de inundación), y tres locales (calidad del aire, polinización, y tiempo libre urbano). Usamos el software Zonation para identificar las áreas prioritarias para los SAs con base en seis experimentos: con y sin representación de la demanda de los SAs, y cuatro experimentos que representaron el efecto de la zona de flujo de los SAs. Sólo hubo un traslape de 37.1 % entre el 25 % de las áreas prioritarias que englobaron la mayoría de los SAs con y sin representación de la demanda de SAs. El nivel de los SAs que se mantuvo en las áreas prioritarias incrementó de un 23.2 % a 57.9 % después de considerar la demanda de los SAs, especialmente para aquellos SAs con una zona de flujo reducida. Representar la zona de flujo tuvo un pequeño efecto sobre la ubicación de las áreas prioritarias y el nivel de SAs que se mantuvo, pero resultó en menos zonas de flujo sin SAs mantenidos en relación a ignorar las zonas de flujo. Representar la demanda y las zonas de flujo mejoró la representación y distribución de los SAs con zonas de flujo de regionales a locales sin compensaciones grandes en relación al SA global. Hallamos que ignorar la demanda de SAs llevó a la identificación de las áreas prioritarias en las regiones remotas en donde los beneficios de la capacidad de los SAs para la sociedad fueron pequeños. Incorporar los SAs a la planeación de la conservación por lo tanto debería siempre representar a la demanda de los SAs para identificar una red efectiva de prioridades para los SAs.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12875" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12875</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erica S. Nielsen, Maria Beger, Romina Henriques, Kimberly A. Selkoe, Sophie Heyden</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-28T11:05:36.767794-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12875</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12875</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12875</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">872</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">882</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Growing threats to biodiversity and global alteration of habitats and species distributions make it increasingly necessary to consider evolutionary patterns in conservation decision making. Yet, there is no clear-cut guidance on how genetic features can be incorporated into conservation-planning processes, despite multiple molecular markers and several genetic metrics for each marker type to choose from. Genetic patterns differ between species, but the potential tradeoffs among genetic objectives for multiple species in conservation planning are currently understudied. We compared spatial conservation prioritizations derived from 2 metrics of genetic diversity (nucleotide and haplotype diversity) and 2 metrics of genetic isolation (private haplotypes and local genetic differentiation) in mitochondrial DNA of 5 marine species. We compared outcomes of conservation plans based only on habitat representation with plans based on genetic data and habitat representation. Fewer priority areas were selected for conservation plans based solely on habitat representation than on plans that included habitat and genetic data. All 4 genetic metrics selected approximately similar conservation-priority areas, which is likely a result of prioritizing genetic patterns across a genetically diverse array of species. Largely, our results suggest that multispecies genetic conservation objectives are vital to creating protected-area networks that appropriately preserve community-level evolutionary patterns.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12875-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Los Objetivos Genéticos para Especies Múltiples en la Planificación de la Conservación Espacial</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12875-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las crecientes amenazas para la biodiversidad, la alteración global de los hábitats y la distribución de las especies cada vez hacen más necesario considerar los patrones evolutivos en la toma de decisiones sobre la conservación. Sin embargo, no existe una guía bien definida sobre cómo las características genéticas pueden ser incorporadas a los procesos de planificación de la conservación, a pesar de las opciones de múltiples marcadores moleculares y la variedad de medidas genéticas para cada marcador. Los patrones genéticos difieren entre las especies, pero las compensaciones potenciales entre los objetivos genéticos para especies múltiples en la planificación de la conservación no están completamente estudiadas en la actualidad. Comparamos las priorizaciones de conservación espacial derivadas de dos medidas de diversidad genética (diversidad de nucleótidos y haplotipos) y dos medidas de aislamiento genético (haplotipos privados y diferenciación genética local) en el ADN mitocondrial de cinco especies marinas. Comparamos los resultados de los planes de conservación basados solamente en la representación del hábitat con los planes basados en los datos genéticos y la representación del hábitat. Se seleccionaron menos áreas prioritarias con los planes basados solamente en la representación del hábitat que con los planes que incluyeron los datos genéticos y de hábitat. Las cuatro medidas genéticas seleccionaron aproximadamente áreas de prioridad de conservación similares, lo que probablemente es resultado de priorizar los patrones genéticos a lo largo de un conjunto de especies diversas genéticamente. En general, nuestros resultados sugieren que los objetivos de conservación genética de especies múltiples son vitales para crear redes de áreas protegidas que conserven apropiadamente los patrones evolutivos a nivel comunitario.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Growing threats to biodiversity and global alteration of habitats and species distributions make it increasingly necessary to consider evolutionary patterns in conservation decision making. Yet, there is no clear-cut guidance on how genetic features can be incorporated into conservation-planning processes, despite multiple molecular markers and several genetic metrics for each marker type to choose from. Genetic patterns differ between species, but the potential tradeoffs among genetic objectives for multiple species in conservation planning are currently understudied. We compared spatial conservation prioritizations derived from 2 metrics of genetic diversity (nucleotide and haplotype diversity) and 2 metrics of genetic isolation (private haplotypes and local genetic differentiation) in mitochondrial DNA of 5 marine species. We compared outcomes of conservation plans based only on habitat representation with plans based on genetic data and habitat representation. Fewer priority areas were selected for conservation plans based solely on habitat representation than on plans that included habitat and genetic data. All 4 genetic metrics selected approximately similar conservation-priority areas, which is likely a result of prioritizing genetic patterns across a genetically diverse array of species. Largely, our results suggest that multispecies genetic conservation objectives are vital to creating protected-area networks that appropriately preserve community-level evolutionary patterns.


Los Objetivos Genéticos para Especies Múltiples en la Planificación de la Conservación Espacial

Resumen
Las crecientes amenazas para la biodiversidad, la alteración global de los hábitats y la distribución de las especies cada vez hacen más necesario considerar los patrones evolutivos en la toma de decisiones sobre la conservación. Sin embargo, no existe una guía bien definida sobre cómo las características genéticas pueden ser incorporadas a los procesos de planificación de la conservación, a pesar de las opciones de múltiples marcadores moleculares y la variedad de medidas genéticas para cada marcador. Los patrones genéticos difieren entre las especies, pero las compensaciones potenciales entre los objetivos genéticos para especies múltiples en la planificación de la conservación no están completamente estudiadas en la actualidad. Comparamos las priorizaciones de conservación espacial derivadas de dos medidas de diversidad genética (diversidad de nucleótidos y haplotipos) y dos medidas de aislamiento genético (haplotipos privados y diferenciación genética local) en el ADN mitocondrial de cinco especies marinas. Comparamos los resultados de los planes de conservación basados solamente en la representación del hábitat con los planes basados en los datos genéticos y la representación del hábitat. Se seleccionaron menos áreas prioritarias con los planes basados solamente en la representación del hábitat que con los planes que incluyeron los datos genéticos y de hábitat. Las cuatro medidas genéticas seleccionaron aproximadamente áreas de prioridad de conservación similares, lo que probablemente es resultado de priorizar los patrones genéticos a lo largo de un conjunto de especies diversas genéticamente. En general, nuestros resultados sugieren que los objetivos de conservación genética de especies múltiples son vitales para crear redes de áreas protegidas que conserven apropiadamente los patrones evolutivos a nivel comunitario.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12901" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Performance of IUCN proxies for generation length</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12901</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Performance of IUCN proxies for generation length</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Han Chi Fung, Robin S. Waples</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-08T11:50:33.304393-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12901</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12901</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12901</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">883</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">893</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>One of the criteria used by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to assess threat status is the rate of decline in abundance over 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer. The traditional method for calculating generation length (<em>T</em>) uses age-specific survival and fecundity, but these data are rarely available. Consequently, proxies that require less information are often used, which introduces potential biases. The IUCN recommends 2 proxies based on adult mortality rate, <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0001.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5na&amp;s=b7ee63e603a63b4b8b433a95ee9087d7bee2e925" class="inlineGraphic"/> = <em>α</em> + 1/<em>d</em>, and reproductive life span, <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0002.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5na&amp;s=b27d246ad71c3c819d1ee5d81b2cf3de9564ea46" class="inlineGraphic"/> = <em>α</em> + <em>z<sup>*</sup></em>RL, where <em>α</em> is age at first reproduction, <em>d</em> is adult mortality rate, RL is reproductive life span, and <em>z</em> is a coefficient derived from data for comparable species. We used published life tables for 78 animal and plant populations to evaluate precision and bias of these proxies by comparing <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0003.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nb&amp;s=53116a100d17b63193af7449075ad291de366df9" class="inlineGraphic"/> and <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0004.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nb&amp;s=12fe0e0a1ba693f1d95313dbd6d7a5f002987671" class="inlineGraphic"/> with true generation length. Mean error rates in estimating <em>T</em> were 31% for <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0005.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nb&amp;s=8df461f71b40cb07137eb43a717d28678c15dc5e" class="inlineGraphic"/> and 20% for <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0006.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nc&amp;s=446b6fc73059cf8d0d0061b6483285f5d5c7d370" class="inlineGraphic"/>, but error rates for <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0007.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nc&amp;s=da287f6bd263e47e555b8c1ad8fff688f71583a7" class="inlineGraphic"/> were 16% when we subtracted 1 year ( <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0008.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nc&amp;s=e81017f42807c6304d5d8548a0ff2e34fd770982" class="inlineGraphic"/> ), as suggested by theory; <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0009.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nc&amp;s=6127ad2cfeeb4cd1fc93c891034f3966a195a8ea" class="inlineGraphic"/> also provided largely unbiased estimates regardless of the true generation length. Performance of <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0010.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nd&amp;s=e54f3d8a19b6e80c2484c1fc947a31d2ee4b788a" class="inlineGraphic"/> depends on compilation of detailed data for comparable species, but our results suggest taxonomy is not a reliable indicator of comparability. All 3 proxies depend heavily on a reliable estimate of age at first reproduction, as we illustrated with 2 test species. The relatively large mean errors for all proxies emphasized the importance of collecting the detailed life-history information necessary to calculate true generation length. Unfortunately, publication of such data is less common than it was decades ago. We identified generic patterns of age-specific change in vital rates that can be used to predict expected patterns of bias from applying <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0011.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nd&amp;s=98831afba882fc900348ec1529c3957c5bf5a537" class="inlineGraphic"/>.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12901-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Desempeño de los Sustitutos de la UICN para una Generación</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12901-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Uno de los criterios utilizados por la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (UICN) para evaluar el estado de las amenazas es la tasa de declinación en la abundancia a lo largo de tres generaciones o durante diez años, cualquiera que sea más largo. El método tradicional para calcular la duración de una generación (<em>T</em>) utiliza la supervivencia específica de edad y la fecundidad, pero estos datos rara vez están disponibles. En consecuencia, se utilizan sustitutos que requieren de menos información, lo que introduce sesgos potenciales. La UICN recomienda dos sustitutos basados en la tasa de mortalidad de los adultos, <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0012.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5ne&amp;s=ba66d1dac79b016e2ffdeb1938a2795c96ceedd2" class="inlineGraphic"/> = α + 1/<em>d</em>, y en la duración de la vida reproductiva, <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0013.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5ne&amp;s=c8f3591d8b11a7920981222ce450070238a2ba75" class="inlineGraphic"/> = α + <em>z<sup>*</sup></em>RL, donde α es la edad durante la primera reproducción, <em>d</em> es la tasa de mortalidad, RL es la duración de la vida reproductiva, y <em>z</em> es un coeficiente derivado de los datos para las especies comparables. Utilizamos las tablas de vida publicadas de 78 poblaciones de animales y plantas para evaluar la precisión y el sesgo de estos sustitutos al comparar <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0014.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nf&amp;s=8b91e6c9e6f149adc0977093fc2900e85e489c89" class="inlineGraphic"/> y <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0015.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nf&amp;s=73327abf73b08e62526d040080e2e1ae0cb7fd07" class="inlineGraphic"/> con la verdadera duración de la generación. Las tasas de error promedio en la estimación de <em>T</em> fueron del 31 % para <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0016.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nf&amp;s=922f5dc8f632cd3a0e6d515cc316c3cbf1fc18f4" class="inlineGraphic"/> y del 20 % para <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0017.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nf&amp;s=cd20310a27176e731864148c1007926ef164d4f9" class="inlineGraphic"/>, pero las tasas de error para <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0018.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nf&amp;s=b15dce53629fdf05ba28da55c30c40e7c1112759" class="inlineGraphic"/> fueron del 16 % cuando se restó un año ( <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0019.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5ng&amp;s=e80d6f7e069b17a110a5b6d2f54b16f012cdb545" class="inlineGraphic"/>=<img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0020.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5ng&amp;s=e16b3cb26135ef8cbcf6f087df8bdce954bbb5e2" class="inlineGraphic"/>-1), como se sugiere en la teoría; <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0021.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5ng&amp;s=051f63bce23cfa3ff780d17c870414d1076e994a" class="inlineGraphic"/> también proporcionó estimados generalmente imparciales sin importar la verdadera duración de la generación. El desempeño de <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0022.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5ng&amp;s=03f95947aca01f95103fa8ce48dccb53abbb65b4" class="inlineGraphic"/> depende de la compilación de datos detallados sobre las especies comparables, pero nuestros resultados sugieren que la taxonomía no es un indicador confiable de la comparabilidad. Los tres sustitutos dependen enormemente de un estimado confiable de la edad durante la primera reproducción, como ilustramos con dos especies prueba. Los errores promedio relativamente grandes para todos los sustitutos enfatizan la importancia de la recolección de información detallada sobre la historia de vida, necesaria para calcular la verdadera duración de una generación. Desafortunadamente, la publicación de dichos datos es menos común que hace dos décadas. Identificamos los patrones genéricos del cambio específico de edad en las tasas vitales que pueden utilizarse para predecir los patrones esperados del sesgo causado por aplicar <img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/cobi.12901/asset/equation/cobi12901-math-0023.png?v=1&amp;t=j5ytv5nh&amp;s=4ca1eb7ca18d0ab596132f61ec7bbed6747afc02" class="inlineGraphic"/>.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

One of the criteria used by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to assess threat status is the rate of decline in abundance over 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer. The traditional method for calculating generation length (T) uses age-specific survival and fecundity, but these data are rarely available. Consequently, proxies that require less information are often used, which introduces potential biases. The IUCN recommends 2 proxies based on adult mortality rate, T̂d = α + 1/d, and reproductive life span, T̂z = α + z*RL, where α is age at first reproduction, d is adult mortality rate, RL is reproductive life span, and z is a coefficient derived from data for comparable species. We used published life tables for 78 animal and plant populations to evaluate precision and bias of these proxies by comparing T̂d and T̂z with true generation length. Mean error rates in estimating T were 31% for T̂d and 20% for T̂z, but error rates for T̂d were 16% when we subtracted 1 year ( T̂d( adj )=T̂d−1 ), as suggested by theory; T̂d( adj ) also provided largely unbiased estimates regardless of the true generation length. Performance of T̂z depends on compilation of detailed data for comparable species, but our results suggest taxonomy is not a reliable indicator of comparability. All 3 proxies depend heavily on a reliable estimate of age at first reproduction, as we illustrated with 2 test species. The relatively large mean errors for all proxies emphasized the importance of collecting the detailed life-history information necessary to calculate true generation length. Unfortunately, publication of such data is less common than it was decades ago. We identified generic patterns of age-specific change in vital rates that can be used to predict expected patterns of bias from applying T̂d( adj ).


El Desempeño de los Sustitutos de la UICN para una Generación

Resumen
Uno de los criterios utilizados por la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza (UICN) para evaluar el estado de las amenazas es la tasa de declinación en la abundancia a lo largo de tres generaciones o durante diez años, cualquiera que sea más largo. El método tradicional para calcular la duración de una generación (T) utiliza la supervivencia específica de edad y la fecundidad, pero estos datos rara vez están disponibles. En consecuencia, se utilizan sustitutos que requieren de menos información, lo que introduce sesgos potenciales. La UICN recomienda dos sustitutos basados en la tasa de mortalidad de los adultos, T̂d = α + 1/d, y en la duración de la vida reproductiva, T̂z = α + z*RL, donde α es la edad durante la primera reproducción, d es la tasa de mortalidad, RL es la duración de la vida reproductiva, y z es un coeficiente derivado de los datos para las especies comparables. Utilizamos las tablas de vida publicadas de 78 poblaciones de animales y plantas para evaluar la precisión y el sesgo de estos sustitutos al comparar T̂d y T̂z con la verdadera duración de la generación. Las tasas de error promedio en la estimación de T fueron del 31 % para T̂d y del 20 % para T̂z, pero las tasas de error para T̂d fueron del 16 % cuando se restó un año ( T̂d( adj )=T̂d-1), como se sugiere en la teoría; T̂d( adj ) también proporcionó estimados generalmente imparciales sin importar la verdadera duración de la generación. El desempeño de T̂z depende de la compilación de datos detallados sobre las especies comparables, pero nuestros resultados sugieren que la taxonomía no es un indicador confiable de la comparabilidad. Los tres sustitutos dependen enormemente de un estimado confiable de la edad durante la primera reproducción, como ilustramos con dos especies prueba. Los errores promedio relativamente grandes para todos los sustitutos enfatizan la importancia de la recolección de información detallada sobre la historia de vida, necesaria para calcular la verdadera duración de una generación. Desafortunadamente, la publicación de dichos datos es menos común que hace dos décadas. Identificamos los patrones genéricos del cambio específico de edad en las tasas vitales que pueden utilizarse para predecir los patrones esperados del sesgo causado por aplicar T̂d( adj ).

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12897" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Representation of critical natural capital in China</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12897</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Representation of critical natural capital in China</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yihe Lü, Liwei Zhang, Yuan Zeng, Bojie Fu, Charlotte Whitham, Shuguang Liu, Bingfang Wu</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-02-20T14:10:29.911583-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12897</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12897</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12897</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">894</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">902</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Traditional means of assessing representativeness of conservation value in protected areas depend on measures of structural biodiversity. The effectiveness of priority conservation areas at representing critical natural capital (CNC) (i.e., an essential and renewable subset of natural capital) remains largely unknown. We analyzed the representativeness of CNC-conservation priority areas in national nature reserves (i.e., nature reserves under jurisdiction of the central government with large spatial distribution across the provinces) in China with a new biophysical-based composite indicator approach. With this approach, we integrated the net primary production of vegetation, topography, soil, and climate variables to map and rank terrestrial ecosystems capacities to generate CNC. National nature reserves accounted for 6.7% of CNC-conservation priority areas across China. Considerable gaps (35.2%) existed between overall (or potential) CNC representativeness nationally and CNC representation in national reserves, and there was significant spatial heterogeneity of representativeness in CNC-conservation priority areas at the regional and provincial levels. For example, the best and worst representations were, respectively, 13.0% and 1.6% regionally and 28.9% and 0.0% provincially. Policy in China is transitioning toward the goal of an ecologically sustainable civilization. We identified CNC-conservation priority areas and conservation gaps and thus contribute to the policy goals of optimization of the national nature reserve network and the demarcation of areas critical to improving the representativeness and conservation of highly functioning areas of natural capital. Moreover, our method for assessing representation of CNC can be easily adapted to other large-scale networks of conservation areas because few data are needed, and our model is relatively simple.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12897-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Representación del Capital Natural Crítico en China</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12897-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Los medios tradicionales para evaluar la representatividad de los valores de conservación en las áreas protegidas dependen de las medidas de la biodiversidad estructural. La efectividad de las áreas de conservación prioritarias por representar al capital natural crítico (CNC) (es decir, un subconjunto esencial y renovable de capital natural) todavía permanece desconocida en su mayoría. Analizamos la representatividad de las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC en las reservas naturales nacionales (es decir, reservas naturales bajo jurisdicción del gobierno central con una gran distribución espacial a lo largo de las provincias) de China con una nueva estrategia indicadora basada en componentes biofísicos. Con esta estrategia, integramos la producción primaria neta de vegetación, la topografía, el suelo y las variables climáticas al mapa y clasificamos las capacidades de los ecosistemas terrestres para generar CNC. Las reservas naturales nacionales representaron el 6.7 % de las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC en toda China. Existieron vacíos considerables (35.2 %) entre la representatividad general (o potencial) de CNC a nivel nacional y la representación de CNC en las reservas nacionales, y hubo una heterogeneidad espacial significativa de la representatividad en las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC en los niveles regionales y provinciales. Por ejemplo, la mejor y la peor representación fueron, respectivamente, 13.0 % y 1.6 % regionalmente y 28.9 % y 0.0 % provincialmente. La política en China está en transición hacia la meta de una civilización sustentable ecológicamente. Identificamos las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC y los vacíos de conservación y con esto contribuimos a las metas políticas de optimizar la red de reservas naturales nacionales y la demarcación de las áreas cruciales para mejorar la representatividad y conservación de las áreas de capital natural altamente funcionales. Además, nuestro método para evaluar la representación del CNC puede adaptarse fácilmente a otras redes a gran escala de áreas de conservación porque se requieren pocos datos y nuestro modelo es relativamente simple.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Traditional means of assessing representativeness of conservation value in protected areas depend on measures of structural biodiversity. The effectiveness of priority conservation areas at representing critical natural capital (CNC) (i.e., an essential and renewable subset of natural capital) remains largely unknown. We analyzed the representativeness of CNC-conservation priority areas in national nature reserves (i.e., nature reserves under jurisdiction of the central government with large spatial distribution across the provinces) in China with a new biophysical-based composite indicator approach. With this approach, we integrated the net primary production of vegetation, topography, soil, and climate variables to map and rank terrestrial ecosystems capacities to generate CNC. National nature reserves accounted for 6.7% of CNC-conservation priority areas across China. Considerable gaps (35.2%) existed between overall (or potential) CNC representativeness nationally and CNC representation in national reserves, and there was significant spatial heterogeneity of representativeness in CNC-conservation priority areas at the regional and provincial levels. For example, the best and worst representations were, respectively, 13.0% and 1.6% regionally and 28.9% and 0.0% provincially. Policy in China is transitioning toward the goal of an ecologically sustainable civilization. We identified CNC-conservation priority areas and conservation gaps and thus contribute to the policy goals of optimization of the national nature reserve network and the demarcation of areas critical to improving the representativeness and conservation of highly functioning areas of natural capital. Moreover, our method for assessing representation of CNC can be easily adapted to other large-scale networks of conservation areas because few data are needed, and our model is relatively simple.


Representación del Capital Natural Crítico en China

Resumen
Los medios tradicionales para evaluar la representatividad de los valores de conservación en las áreas protegidas dependen de las medidas de la biodiversidad estructural. La efectividad de las áreas de conservación prioritarias por representar al capital natural crítico (CNC) (es decir, un subconjunto esencial y renovable de capital natural) todavía permanece desconocida en su mayoría. Analizamos la representatividad de las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC en las reservas naturales nacionales (es decir, reservas naturales bajo jurisdicción del gobierno central con una gran distribución espacial a lo largo de las provincias) de China con una nueva estrategia indicadora basada en componentes biofísicos. Con esta estrategia, integramos la producción primaria neta de vegetación, la topografía, el suelo y las variables climáticas al mapa y clasificamos las capacidades de los ecosistemas terrestres para generar CNC. Las reservas naturales nacionales representaron el 6.7 % de las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC en toda China. Existieron vacíos considerables (35.2 %) entre la representatividad general (o potencial) de CNC a nivel nacional y la representación de CNC en las reservas nacionales, y hubo una heterogeneidad espacial significativa de la representatividad en las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC en los niveles regionales y provinciales. Por ejemplo, la mejor y la peor representación fueron, respectivamente, 13.0 % y 1.6 % regionalmente y 28.9 % y 0.0 % provincialmente. La política en China está en transición hacia la meta de una civilización sustentable ecológicamente. Identificamos las áreas de conservación prioritarias de CNC y los vacíos de conservación y con esto contribuimos a las metas políticas de optimizar la red de reservas naturales nacionales y la demarcación de las áreas cruciales para mejorar la representatividad y conservación de las áreas de capital natural altamente funcionales. Además, nuestro método para evaluar la representación del CNC puede adaptarse fácilmente a otras redes a gran escala de áreas de conservación porque se requieren pocos datos y nuestro modelo es relativamente simple.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12867" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Trait space of rare plants in a fire-dependent ecosystem</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12867</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trait space of rare plants in a fire-dependent ecosystem</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory M. Ames, Wade A. Wall, Matthew G. Hohmann, Justin P. Wright</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-07T15:15:28.858769-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12867</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12867</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12867</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">903</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">911</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The causes of species rarity are of critical concern because of the high extinction risk associated with rarity. Studies examining individual rare species have limited generality, whereas trait-based approaches offer a means to identify functional causes of rarity that can be applied to communities with disparate species pools. Differences in functional traits between rare and common species may be indicative of the functional causes of species rarity and may therefore be useful in crafting species conservation strategies. However, there is a conspicuous lack of studies comparing the functional traits of rare species and co-occurring common species. We measured 18 important functional traits for 19 rare and 134 common understory plant species from North Carolina's Sandhills region and compared their trait distributions to determine whether there are significant functional differences that may explain species rarity. Flowering, fire, and tissue-chemistry traits differed significantly between rare and common, co-occurring species. Differences in specific traits suggest that fire suppression has driven rarity in this system and that changes to the timing and severity of prescribed fire may improve conservation success. Our method provides a useful tool to prioritize conservation efforts in other systems based on the likelihood that rare species are functionally capable of persisting.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12867-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>El Espacio Característico de las Plantas Raras en un Ecosistema Dependiente del Fuego</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12867-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las causas de la rareza de las especies son de mucho interés debido al alto riesgo de extinción asociado con la rareza. Los estudios que examinan a las especies raras una por una tienen una generalidad limitada, mientras que las estrategias basadas en las características ofrecen los medios para identificar las causas funcionales de la rareza que pueden aplicarse a las comunidades con pools dispares de especies. Las diferencias de las características funcionales entre las especies comunes y las raras pueden ser indicadoras de las causas funcionales de la rareza de las especies y por lo tanto puede ser útil para elaborar estrategias de conservación de especies. Sin embargo, existe una carencia conspicua de estudios que comparen las características funcionales de las especies raras con las de las especies comunes co-presentes. Medimos 18 características funcionales importantes de 19 especies raras y 134 especies comunes de plantas de sotobosque de la región de las Dunas de Carolina del Norte y comparamos sus características de distribución para determinar si hay diferencias funcionales significativas que pueden explicar la rareza de especies. Las características de florecimiento, fuego y química de los tejidos difirieron significativamente entre las especies raras y comunes que ocurren en el mismo sitio. Las diferencias en las características específicas sugieren que la supresión del fuego ha propiciado la rareza en este sistema y que los cambios en la sincronización y la gravedad del fuego prescrito pueden aumentar el éxito de la conservación. Nuestro método proporciona una herramienta útil para priorizar los esfuerzos de conservación en otros sistemas basados en la probabilidad de que las especies raras son funcionalmente capaces de persistir.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

The causes of species rarity are of critical concern because of the high extinction risk associated with rarity. Studies examining individual rare species have limited generality, whereas trait-based approaches offer a means to identify functional causes of rarity that can be applied to communities with disparate species pools. Differences in functional traits between rare and common species may be indicative of the functional causes of species rarity and may therefore be useful in crafting species conservation strategies. However, there is a conspicuous lack of studies comparing the functional traits of rare species and co-occurring common species. We measured 18 important functional traits for 19 rare and 134 common understory plant species from North Carolina's Sandhills region and compared their trait distributions to determine whether there are significant functional differences that may explain species rarity. Flowering, fire, and tissue-chemistry traits differed significantly between rare and common, co-occurring species. Differences in specific traits suggest that fire suppression has driven rarity in this system and that changes to the timing and severity of prescribed fire may improve conservation success. Our method provides a useful tool to prioritize conservation efforts in other systems based on the likelihood that rare species are functionally capable of persisting.


El Espacio Característico de las Plantas Raras en un Ecosistema Dependiente del Fuego

Resumen
Las causas de la rareza de las especies son de mucho interés debido al alto riesgo de extinción asociado con la rareza. Los estudios que examinan a las especies raras una por una tienen una generalidad limitada, mientras que las estrategias basadas en las características ofrecen los medios para identificar las causas funcionales de la rareza que pueden aplicarse a las comunidades con pools dispares de especies. Las diferencias de las características funcionales entre las especies comunes y las raras pueden ser indicadoras de las causas funcionales de la rareza de las especies y por lo tanto puede ser útil para elaborar estrategias de conservación de especies. Sin embargo, existe una carencia conspicua de estudios que comparen las características funcionales de las especies raras con las de las especies comunes co-presentes. Medimos 18 características funcionales importantes de 19 especies raras y 134 especies comunes de plantas de sotobosque de la región de las Dunas de Carolina del Norte y comparamos sus características de distribución para determinar si hay diferencias funcionales significativas que pueden explicar la rareza de especies. Las características de florecimiento, fuego y química de los tejidos difirieron significativamente entre las especies raras y comunes que ocurren en el mismo sitio. Las diferencias en las características específicas sugieren que la supresión del fuego ha propiciado la rareza en este sistema y que los cambios en la sincronización y la gravedad del fuego prescrito pueden aumentar el éxito de la conservación. Nuestro método proporciona una herramienta útil para priorizar los esfuerzos de conservación en otros sistemas basados en la probabilidad de que las especies raras son funcionalmente capaces de persistir.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12870" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Assessment of mammal reproduction for hunting sustainability through community-based sampling of species in the wild</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12870</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Assessment of mammal reproduction for hunting sustainability through community-based sampling of species in the wild</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pedro Mayor, Hani El Bizri, Richard E. Bodmer, Mark Bowler</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-07T15:15:34.983604-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12870</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12870</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12870</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">912</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">923</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Wildlife subsistence hunting is a major source of protein for tropical rural populations and a prominent conservation issue. The intrinsic rate of natural increase. (<i>r<sub>max</sub></i>) of populations is a key reproductive parameter in the most used assessments of hunting sustainability. However, researchers face severe difficulties in obtaining reproductive data in the wild, so these assessments often rely on classic reproductive rates calculated mostly from studies of captive animals conducted 30 years ago. The result is a flaw in almost 50% of studies, which hampers management decision making. We conducted a 15-year study in the Amazon in which we used reproductive data from the genitalia of 950 hunted female mammals. Genitalia were collected by local hunters. We examined tissue from these samples to estimate birthrates for wild populations of the 10 most hunted mammals. We compared our estimates with classic measures and considered the utility of the use of <i>r<sub>max</sub></i> in sustainability assessments. For woolly monkey (<i>Lagothrix poeppigii</i>) and tapir (<i>Tapirus terrestris</i>), wild birthrates were similar to those from captive populations, whereas birthrates for other ungulates and lowland-paca (<i>Cuniculus paca</i>) were significantly lower than previous estimates. Conversely, for capuchin monkeys (<i>Sapajus macrocephalus</i>), agoutis (<i>Dasyprocta sp</i>.), and coatis (<i>Nasua nasua</i>), our calculated reproductive rates greatly exceeded often-used values. Researchers could keep applying classic measures compatible with our estimates, but for other species previous estimates of <i>r<sub>max</sub></i> may not be appropriate. We suggest that data from local studies be used to set hunting quotas. Our maximum rates of population growth in the wild correlated with body weight, which suggests that our method is consistent and reliable. Integration of this method into community-based wildlife management and the training of local hunters to record pregnancies in hunted animals could efficiently generate useful information of life histories of wild species and thus improve management of natural resources.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12870-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Evaluación de la Reproducción de Mamíferos para la Sustentabilidad de la Caza a través del Muestreo Comunitario de Especies en Vida Libre</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12870-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>La caza de subsistencia de fauna silvestre es una importante fuente de proteína para las poblaciones rurales tropicales y un tema prominente de conservación. La tasa intrínseca de incremento natural (<i>r<sub>max</sub></i>) de las poblaciones es un parámetro reproductivo clave en las evaluaciones de la sustentabilidad de la caza más utilizadas. Sin embargo, los investigadores se enfrentan a dificultades graves para obtener datos reproductivos en vida libre, así que estas evaluaciones generalmente dependen de tasas clásicas de reproducción calculadas en su mayoría a partir de estudios de animales cautivos y realizadas hace 30 años. El resultado son errores en casi el 50 % de los estudios, lo que obstaculiza la toma de decisiones sobre el manejo. Realizamos un estudio de 15 años en el Amazonas en el cual se utilizaron datos reproductivos de los genitales de 950 hembras de mamíferos cazados. Los genitales fueron recolectados por los cazadores locales. Examinamos el tejido de estas muestras para estimar las tasas de gestación de las poblaciones silvestres de los diez mamíferos más cazados. Comparamos nuestros estimados con las medidas clásicas y consideramos la utilidad del uso de <i>r<sub>max</sub></i> en las evaluaciones de sustentabilidad. Para el mono lanudo (<i>Lagothrix poeppigii</i>) y el tapir (<i>Tapirus terrestris</i>) las tasas de gestación en vida libre fueron similares a las de poblaciones cautivas, mientras que las tasas de nacimiento de otros ungulados y de la paca de tierras bajas (<i>Cuniculus paca</i>) fueron significativamente menores que los estimados previos. En el caso contrario, para los monos capuchinos (<i>Sapajus macrocephalus</i>), agutíes (<i>Dasyprocta sp.</i>) y coatíes (<i>Nasua nasua</i>), nuestras tasas reproductivas calculadas excedieron enormemente los valores frecuentemente utilizados. Los investigadores podrían seguir aplicando las medidas clásicas compatibles con nuestras estimaciones, pero para otras especies las estimaciones previas de <i>r<sub>max</sub></i> pueden no ser apropiadas. Sugerimos que sean utilizados datos de estudios locales para establecer cuotas de caza. Nuestras tasas máximas de crecimiento poblacional en vida libre estuvieron correlacionadas con el peso corporal, lo que sugiere que nuestro método es consistente y confiable. La integración de este método al manejo comunitario de la fauna silvestre y al entrenamiento de los cazadores locales para registrar las gestaciones de los animales cazados podría generar eficientemente información útil sobre la historia de vida de las especies silvestres y así mejorar el manejo de los recursos naturales.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Wildlife subsistence hunting is a major source of protein for tropical rural populations and a prominent conservation issue. The intrinsic rate of natural increase. (rmax) of populations is a key reproductive parameter in the most used assessments of hunting sustainability. However, researchers face severe difficulties in obtaining reproductive data in the wild, so these assessments often rely on classic reproductive rates calculated mostly from studies of captive animals conducted 30 years ago. The result is a flaw in almost 50% of studies, which hampers management decision making. We conducted a 15-year study in the Amazon in which we used reproductive data from the genitalia of 950 hunted female mammals. Genitalia were collected by local hunters. We examined tissue from these samples to estimate birthrates for wild populations of the 10 most hunted mammals. We compared our estimates with classic measures and considered the utility of the use of rmax in sustainability assessments. For woolly monkey (Lagothrix poeppigii) and tapir (Tapirus terrestris), wild birthrates were similar to those from captive populations, whereas birthrates for other ungulates and lowland-paca (Cuniculus paca) were significantly lower than previous estimates. Conversely, for capuchin monkeys (Sapajus macrocephalus), agoutis (Dasyprocta sp.), and coatis (Nasua nasua), our calculated reproductive rates greatly exceeded often-used values. Researchers could keep applying classic measures compatible with our estimates, but for other species previous estimates of rmax may not be appropriate. We suggest that data from local studies be used to set hunting quotas. Our maximum rates of population growth in the wild correlated with body weight, which suggests that our method is consistent and reliable. Integration of this method into community-based wildlife management and the training of local hunters to record pregnancies in hunted animals could efficiently generate useful information of life histories of wild species and thus improve management of natural resources.


Evaluación de la Reproducción de Mamíferos para la Sustentabilidad de la Caza a través del Muestreo Comunitario de Especies en Vida Libre

Resumen
La caza de subsistencia de fauna silvestre es una importante fuente de proteína para las poblaciones rurales tropicales y un tema prominente de conservación. La tasa intrínseca de incremento natural (rmax) de las poblaciones es un parámetro reproductivo clave en las evaluaciones de la sustentabilidad de la caza más utilizadas. Sin embargo, los investigadores se enfrentan a dificultades graves para obtener datos reproductivos en vida libre, así que estas evaluaciones generalmente dependen de tasas clásicas de reproducción calculadas en su mayoría a partir de estudios de animales cautivos y realizadas hace 30 años. El resultado son errores en casi el 50 % de los estudios, lo que obstaculiza la toma de decisiones sobre el manejo. Realizamos un estudio de 15 años en el Amazonas en el cual se utilizaron datos reproductivos de los genitales de 950 hembras de mamíferos cazados. Los genitales fueron recolectados por los cazadores locales. Examinamos el tejido de estas muestras para estimar las tasas de gestación de las poblaciones silvestres de los diez mamíferos más cazados. Comparamos nuestros estimados con las medidas clásicas y consideramos la utilidad del uso de rmax en las evaluaciones de sustentabilidad. Para el mono lanudo (Lagothrix poeppigii) y el tapir (Tapirus terrestris) las tasas de gestación en vida libre fueron similares a las de poblaciones cautivas, mientras que las tasas de nacimiento de otros ungulados y de la paca de tierras bajas (Cuniculus paca) fueron significativamente menores que los estimados previos. En el caso contrario, para los monos capuchinos (Sapajus macrocephalus), agutíes (Dasyprocta sp.) y coatíes (Nasua nasua), nuestras tasas reproductivas calculadas excedieron enormemente los valores frecuentemente utilizados. Los investigadores podrían seguir aplicando las medidas clásicas compatibles con nuestras estimaciones, pero para otras especies las estimaciones previas de rmax pueden no ser apropiadas. Sugerimos que sean utilizados datos de estudios locales para establecer cuotas de caza. Nuestras tasas máximas de crecimiento poblacional en vida libre estuvieron correlacionadas con el peso corporal, lo que sugiere que nuestro método es consistente y confiable. La integración de este método al manejo comunitario de la fauna silvestre y al entrenamiento de los cazadores locales para registrar las gestaciones de los animales cazados podría generar eficientemente información útil sobre la historia de vida de las especies silvestres y así mejorar el manejo de los recursos naturales.

</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12883" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Consistency of effects of tropical-forest disturbance on species composition and richness relative to use of indicator taxa</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12883</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Consistency of effects of tropical-forest disturbance on species composition and richness relative to use of indicator taxa</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">N.E. Stork, D.S. Srivastava, P. Eggleton, M. Hodda, G. Lawson, R.R.B. Leakey, A.D. Watt</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-11T08:55:47.773541-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12883</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12883</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12883</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Contributed Paper</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">924</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">933</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Lawton et al. (1998) found, in a highly cited study, that the species richness of 8 taxa each responds differently to anthropogenic disturbance in Cameroon forests. Recent developments in conservation science suggest that net number of species is an insensitive measure of change and that understanding which species are affected by disturbance is more important. It is also recognized that all disturbance types are not equal in their effect on species and that grouping species according to function rather than taxonomy is more informative of responses of biodiversity to change. In a reanalysis of most of the original Cameroon data set (canopy and ground ants, termites, canopy beetles, nematodes, and butterflies), we focused on changes in species and functional composition rather than richness and used a more inclusive measure of forest disturbance based on 4 component drivers of change: years since disturbance, tree cover, soil compaction, and degree of tree removal. Effects of disturbance on compositional change were largely concordant between taxa. Contrary to Lawton et al.’s findings, species richness for most groups did not decline with disturbance level, providing support for the view that trends in species richness at local scales do not reflect the resilience of ecosystems to disturbance. Disturbance affected species composition more strongly than species richness for butterflies, canopy beetles, and litter ants. For these groups, disturbance caused species replacements rather than just species loss. Only termites showed effects of disturbance on species richness but not composition, indicating species loss without replacement. Although disturbance generally caused changes in composition, the strength of this relationship depended on the disturbance driver. Butterflies, litter ants, and nematodes were correlated with amount of tree cover, canopy beetles were most strongly correlated with time since disturbance, and termites were most strongly correlated with degree of soil disturbance. There were moderately divergent responses to disturbance between functional feeding groups. Disturbance was most strongly correlated with compositional differences of herbivores within beetles and nematodes and humus feeders within termites. Our results suggest that consideration of the impact of different forms of disturbance on species and functional composition, rather than on net numbers of species, is important when assessing the impacts of disturbance on biodiversity.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12883-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Consistencia de los Efectos de Perturbación del Bosque Tropical sobre la Composición y Riqueza de Especies en Relación con el Uso de Taxa Indicadores</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12883-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Lawton et al. (1998) encontraron, en un estudio citado frecuentemente, que la riqueza de especies de ocho taxa respondió cada una de manera diferente a la perturbación antropogénica en los bosques de Camerún. Los desarrollos recientes en la ciencia de la conservación sugieren que el número neto de especies es una medida insensible del cambio y que es más importante entender cuáles especies son afectadas por la perturbación. También se reconoce que todos los tipos de perturbaciones no son iguales en cuanto a sus efectos sobre las especies y que agrupar a las especies de acuerdo a su función en lugar de la taxonomía brinda más información sobre las respuestas de la biodiversidad al cambio. En un re-análisis de la mayoría del conjunto de datos originales sobre Camerún (hormigas del dosel y del suelo, termitas, escarabajos del dosel, nemátodos y mariposas) nos enfocamos sobre los cambios en las especies y la composición funcional en lugar de la riqueza, y utilizamos una medida más incluyente de la perturbación del bosque basada en cuatro componentes conductores del cambio: los años desde la perturbación, cobertura de árboles, compactación del suelo, y el grado de remoción de árboles. Los efectos de la perturbación sobre el cambio en la composición fueron concordantes en gran parte entre los taxones. Contrario a los hallazgos de Lawton et al., la riqueza de especies para la mayoría de los grupos no declinó junto con el nivel de perturbación, proporcionando apoyo para la opinión de que las tendencias en la riqueza de especies a escalas locales no reflejan la resiliencia de los ecosistemas ante la perturbación. La perturbación afectó con mayor fuerza a la composición de especies que a la riqueza de especies de mariposas, escarabajos de dosel y hormigas descomponedoras. Para estos grupos, la perturbación causó reemplazo de especies en lugar de sólo la pérdida de especies. Sólo las termitas mostraron efectos de perturbación sobre la riqueza de especies pero no la composición, indicando pérdida de especies sin reemplazo. Aunque la perturbación en general causó cambios en la composición, la fuerza de esta relación dependió del conductor de la perturbación. Las mariposas, las hormigas descomponedoras y los nemátodos estuvieron correlacionados con la cantidad de cobertura de árboles; los escarabajos del dosel estuvieron más correlacionados con el tiempo desde la perturbación; y las termitas estuvieron más correlacionadas con el grado de perturbación del suelo. Hubo respuestas moderadamente divergentes a la perturbación entre los grupos funcionales de alimentación. La perturbación estuvo más correlacionada con las diferencias en la composición de los herbívoros dentro de los escarabajos y los nematodos y los animales que se alimentan del humus dentro de las termitas. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la consideración del impacto de las formas diferentes de perturbación sobre las especies y la composición funcional, en lugar de sobre un número neto de especies, es importante cuando se evalúan los impactos de la perturbación sobre la biodiversidad.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Lawton et al. (1998) found, in a highly cited study, that the species richness of 8 taxa each responds differently to anthropogenic disturbance in Cameroon forests. Recent developments in conservation science suggest that net number of species is an insensitive measure of change and that understanding which species are affected by disturbance is more important. It is also recognized that all disturbance types are not equal in their effect on species and that grouping species according to function rather than taxonomy is more informative of responses of biodiversity to change. In a reanalysis of most of the original Cameroon data set (canopy and ground ants, termites, canopy beetles, nematodes, and butterflies), we focused on changes in species and functional composition rather than richness and used a more inclusive measure of forest disturbance based on 4 component drivers of change: years since disturbance, tree cover, soil compaction, and degree of tree removal. Effects of disturbance on compositional change were largely concordant between taxa. Contrary to Lawton et al.’s findings, species richness for most groups did not decline with disturbance level, providing support for the view that trends in species richness at local scales do not reflect the resilience of ecosystems to disturbance. Disturbance affected species composition more strongly than species richness for butterflies, canopy beetles, and litter ants. For these groups, disturbance caused species replacements rather than just species loss. Only termites showed effects of disturbance on species richness but not composition, indicating species loss without replacement. Although disturbance generally caused changes in composition, the strength of this relationship depended on the disturbance driver. Butterflies, litter ants, and nematodes were correlated with amount of tree cover, canopy beetles were most strongly correlated with time since disturbance, and termites were most strongly correlated with degree of soil disturbance. There were moderately divergent responses to disturbance between functional feeding groups. Disturbance was most strongly correlated with compositional differences of herbivores within beetles and nematodes and humus feeders within termites. Our results suggest that consideration of the impact of different forms of disturbance on species and functional composition, rather than on net numbers of species, is important when assessing the impacts of disturbance on biodiversity.


Consistencia de los Efectos de Perturbación del Bosque Tropical sobre la Composición y Riqueza de Especies en Relación con el Uso de Taxa Indicadores

Resumen
Lawton et al. (1998) encontraron, en un estudio citado frecuentemente, que la riqueza de especies de ocho taxa respondió cada una de manera diferente a la perturbación antropogénica en los bosques de Camerún. Los desarrollos recientes en la ciencia de la conservación sugieren que el número neto de especies es una medida insensible del cambio y que es más importante entender cuáles especies son afectadas por la perturbación. También se reconoce que todos los tipos de perturbaciones no son iguales en cuanto a sus efectos sobre las especies y que agrupar a las especies de acuerdo a su función en lugar de la taxonomía brinda más información sobre las respuestas de la biodiversidad al cambio. En un re-análisis de la mayoría del conjunto de datos originales sobre Camerún (hormigas del dosel y del suelo, termitas, escarabajos del dosel, nemátodos y mariposas) nos enfocamos sobre los cambios en las especies y la composición funcional en lugar de la riqueza, y utilizamos una medida más incluyente de la perturbación del bosque basada en cuatro componentes conductores del cambio: los años desde la perturbación, cobertura de árboles, compactación del suelo, y el grado de remoción de árboles. Los efectos de la perturbación sobre el cambio en la composición fueron concordantes en gran parte entre los taxones. Contrario a los hallazgos de Lawton et al., la riqueza de especies para la mayoría de los grupos no declinó junto con el nivel de perturbación, proporcionando apoyo para la opinión de que las tendencias en la riqueza de especies a escalas locales no reflejan la resiliencia de los ecosistemas ante la perturbación. La perturbación afectó con mayor fuerza a la composición de especies que a la riqueza de especies de mariposas, escarabajos de dosel y hormigas descomponedoras. Para estos grupos, la perturbación causó reemplazo de especies en lugar de sólo la pérdida de especies. Sólo las termitas mostraron efectos de perturbación sobre la riqueza de especies pero no la composición, indicando pérdida de especies sin reemplazo. Aunque la perturbación en general causó cambios en la composición, la fuerza de esta relación dependió del conductor de la perturbación. Las mariposas, las hormigas descomponedoras y los nemátodos estuvieron correlacionados con la cantidad de cobertura de árboles; los escarabajos del dosel estuvieron más correlacionados con el tiempo desde la perturbación; y las termitas estuvieron más correlacionadas con el grado de perturbación del suelo. Hubo respuestas moderadamente divergentes a la perturbación entre los grupos funcionales de alimentación. La perturbación estuvo más correlacionada con las diferencias en la composición de los herbívoros dentro de los escarabajos y los nematodos y los animales que se alimentan del humus dentro de las termitas. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la consideración del impacto de las formas diferentes de perturbación sobre las especies y la composición funcional, en lugar de sobre un número neto de especies, es importante cuando se evalúan los impactos de la perturbación sobre la biodiversidad.


</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12878" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Toward accurate and precise estimates of lion density</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12878</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Toward accurate and precise estimates of lion density</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicholas B. Elliot, Arjun M. Gopalaswamy</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-05-29T04:28:09.644615-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12878</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12878</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12878</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Conservation Methods</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">934</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">943</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3>
<div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Reliable estimates of animal density are fundamental to understanding ecological processes and population dynamics. Furthermore, their accuracy is vital to conservation because wildlife authorities rely on estimates to make decisions. However, it is notoriously difficult to accurately estimate density for wide-ranging carnivores that occur at low densities. In recent years, significant progress has been made in density estimation of Asian carnivores, but the methods have not been widely adapted to African carnivores, such as lions (<i>Panthera leo</i>). Although abundance indices for lions may produce poor inferences, they continue to be used to estimate density and inform management and policy. We used sighting data from a 3-month survey and adapted a Bayesian spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) model to estimate spatial lion density in the Maasai Mara National Reserve and surrounding conservancies in Kenya. Our unstructured spatial capture-recapture sampling design incorporated search effort to explicitly estimate detection probability and density on a fine spatial scale, making our approach robust in the context of varying detection probabilities. Overall posterior mean lion density was estimated to be 17.08 (posterior SD 1.310) lions &gt;1 year old/100 km<sup>2</sup>, and the sex ratio was estimated at 2.2 females to 1 male. Our modeling framework and narrow posterior SD demonstrate that SECR methods can produce statistically rigorous and precise estimates of population parameters, and we argue that they should be favored over less reliable abundance indices. Furthermore, our approach is flexible enough to incorporate different data types, which enables robust population estimates over relatively short survey periods in a variety of systems. Trend analyses are essential to guide conservation decisions but are frequently based on surveys of differing reliability. We therefore call for a unified framework to assess lion numbers in key populations to improve management and policy decisions.</p></div>

<div class="section" id="cobi12878-sec-0010" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="para"><p>Hacia Estimaciones Certeras y Precisas de la Densidad de Leones</p></div><div class="section" id="cobi12878-sec-0020"><h5>Resumen</h5><div class="para"><p>Las estimaciones confiables de la densidad animal son fundamentales para el entendimiento de los procesos ecológicos y las dinámicas poblacionales. Más allá, su certeza es vital para la conservación porque las autoridades de la vida silvestre dependen de las estimaciones para tomar decisiones. Sin embargo, es notoria la dificultad que existe para estimar con certeza la densidad de los carnívoros con una extensión amplia que están presentes en densidades bajas. En años recientes, se ha avanzado significativamente en la estimación de densidad de los carnívoros asiáticos, pero los métodos no han sido adaptados ampliamente para los carnívoros africanos como los leones (<i>Panthera leo</i>). Aunque los índices de abundancia para los leones pueden producir inferencias pobres, todavía se usan para estimar la densidad e informar al manejo y a la política. Utilizamos datos de avistamientos de un censo de tres meses y adaptamos un modelo bayesiano de captura-recaptura espacialmente explícito (CREE) para estimar la densidad espacial de los leones en la Reserva Nacional Maasai Mara y las reservas circundantes. Nuestro muestreo desestructurado de captura-recaptura espacial incorporó esfuerzos de búsqueda para estimar explícitamente la probabilidad de detección y la densidad en una escala espacial fina, lo que hizo a nuestra estrategia convincente en el contexto de las probabilidades de detección variantes. En general, se estimó que la densidad media de leones era 17.08 (DS posterior 1.310) leones &gt;1 año de edad/100 km<sup>2</sup>, y se estimó que la proporción de sexos era 2.2 hembras por 1 macho. Nuestro marco de trabajo de la modelación y la DS posterior estrecha demuestran que los métodos CREE pueden producir estimaciones de los parámetros poblacionales estadísticamente rigurosas y precisas, y argumentamos que deberían ser favorecidos por encima de los índices de abundancia menos confiables. Además, nuestra estrategia es lo suficientemente flexible para incorporar diferentes tipos de datos, lo que habilita estimaciones poblacionales convincentes con periodos relativamente cortos de censos en una variedad de sistemas. Los análisis de las tendencias son esenciales para guiar a las decisiones de la conservación pero están basadas frecuentemente en censos de confianza discrepante. Por lo tanto hacemos un llamado por un marco de trabajo unificado para valorar los números de leones en poblaciones clave para mejorar las decisiones de manejo y política.</p></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>

Reliable estimates of animal density are fundamental to understanding ecological processes and population dynamics. Furthermore, their accuracy is vital to conservation because wildlife authorities rely on estimates to make decisions. However, it is notoriously difficult to accurately estimate density for wide-ranging carnivores that occur at low densities. In recent years, significant progress has been made in density estimation of Asian carnivores, but the methods have not been widely adapted to African carnivores, such as lions (Panthera leo). Although abundance indices for lions may produce poor inferences, they continue to be used to estimate density and inform management and policy. We used sighting data from a 3-month survey and adapted a Bayesian spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) model to estimate spatial lion density in the Maasai Mara National Reserve and surrounding conservancies in Kenya. Our unstructured spatial capture-recapture sampling design incorporated search effort to explicitly estimate detection probability and density on a fine spatial scale, making our approach robust in the context of varying detection probabilities. Overall posterior mean lion density was estimated to be 17.08 (posterior SD 1.310) lions &gt;1 year old/100 km2, and the sex ratio was estimated at 2.2 females to 1 male. Our modeling framework and narrow posterior SD demonstrate that SECR methods can produce statistically rigorous and precise estimates of population parameters, and we argue that they should be favored over less reliable abundance indices. Furthermore, our approach is flexible enough to incorporate different data types, which enables robust population estimates over relatively short survey periods in a variety of systems. Trend analyses are essential to guide conservation decisions but are frequently based on surveys of differing reliability. We therefore call for a unified framework to assess lion numbers in key populations to improve management and policy decisions.


Hacia Estimaciones Certeras y Precisas de la Densidad de Leones

Resumen
Las estimaciones confiables de la densidad animal son fundamentales para el entendimiento de los procesos ecológicos y las dinámicas poblacionales. Más allá, su certeza es vital para la conservación porque las autoridades de la vida silvestre dependen de las estimaciones para tomar decisiones. Sin embargo, es notoria la dificultad que existe para estimar con certeza la densidad de los carnívoros con una extensión amplia que están presentes en densidades bajas. En años recientes, se ha avanzado significativamente en la estimación de densidad de los carnívoros asiáticos, pero los métodos no han sido adaptados ampliamente para los carnívoros africanos como los leones (Panthera leo). Aunque los índices de abundancia para los leones pueden producir inferencias pobres, todavía se usan para estimar la densidad e informar al manejo y a la política. Utilizamos datos de avistamientos de un censo de tres meses y adaptamos un modelo bayesiano de captura-recaptura espacialmente explícito (CREE) para estimar la densidad espacial de los leones en la Reserva Nacional Maasai Mara y las reservas circundantes. Nuestro muestreo desestructurado de captura-recaptura espacial incorporó esfuerzos de búsqueda para estimar explícitamente la probabilidad de detección y la densidad en una escala espacial fina, lo que hizo a nuestra estrategia convincente en el contexto de las probabilidades de detección variantes. En general, se estimó que la densidad media de leones era 17.08 (DS posterior 1.310) leones &gt;1 año de edad/100 km2, y se estimó que la proporción de sexos era 2.2 hembras por 1 macho. Nuestro marco de trabajo de la modelación y la DS posterior estrecha demuestran que los métodos CREE pueden producir estimaciones de los parámetros poblacionales estadísticamente rigurosas y precisas, y argumentamos que deberían ser favorecidos por encima de los índices de abundancia menos confiables. Además, nuestra estrategia es lo suficientemente flexible para incorporar diferentes tipos de datos, lo que habilita estimaciones poblacionales convincentes con periodos relativamente cortos de censos en una variedad de sistemas. Los análisis de las tendencias son esenciales para guiar a las decisiones de la conservación pero están basadas frecuentemente en censos de confianza discrepante. Por lo tanto hacemos un llamado por un marco de trabajo unificado para valorar los números de leones en poblaciones clave para mejorar las decisiones de manejo y política.
</description></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12928" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Unfulfilled promise of data-driven approaches: response to Peterson et al. </title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12928</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Unfulfilled promise of data-driven approaches: response to Peterson et al. </dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart L. Pimm, Grant Harris, Clinton N. Jenkins, Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela, Binbin V. Li</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-11T11:00:30.283372-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12928</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12928</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12928</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Comment</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">944</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">947</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12929" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Problems with reductive, polygon-based methods for estimating species’ ranges: reply to Pimm et al. 2017</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12929</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Problems with reductive, polygon-based methods for estimating species’ ranges: reply to Pimm et al. 2017</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A. Townsend Peterson</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-11T11:05:51.999072-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12929</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12929</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12929</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Comment</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">948</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">951</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12861" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Putting pyrodiversity to work for animal conservation</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12861</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Putting pyrodiversity to work for animal conservation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke T. Kelly, Lluís Brotons, Michael A. McCarthy</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-24T10:17:37.832567-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12861</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12861</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12861</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Diversity</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">952</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">955</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12911" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Two Complementary Approaches to Protecting the Amazon</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12911</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Two Complementary Approaches to Protecting the Amazon</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Plotkin</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-04-10T12:01:01.92501-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12911</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12911</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12911</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">956</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">958</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12919" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Camera Traps, Bird Song, and Creatures of Darkness</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12919</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Camera Traps, Bird Song, and Creatures of Darkness</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Max Møller</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-23T12:45:25.914716-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12919</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12919</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12919</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">958</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">960</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12924" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Noted with Interest</title><link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12924</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noted with Interest</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2017-03-29T16:55:34.239296-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/cobi.12924</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/cobi.12924</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fcobi.12924</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Book Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">960</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">961</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item></rdf:RDF>