<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://onlinelibrarystatic.wiley.com/xslt/wol-journal-rss.xsl"
            type="text/xsl"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/rss/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1757-1707" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>GCB Bioenergy</title><description> Wiley Online Library : GCB Bioenergy</description><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F%28ISSN%291757-1707</link><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</dc:publisher><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en</dc:language><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</dc:rights><prism:issn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1757-1693</prism:issn><prism:eIssn xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1757-1707</prism:eIssn><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><prism:coverDisplayDate xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">January 2012</prism:coverDisplayDate><prism:volume xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">4</prism:volume><prism:number xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1</prism:number><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">106</prism:endingPage><image rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/gcbb.2011.4.issue-1/asset/cover.gif?v=1&amp;s=0cb00942486c824ab810937fff03f4dd4ea5076b"/><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01158.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01159.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01154.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01156.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01157.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01153.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01151.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01152.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01145.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01155.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01147.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01149.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01150.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01142.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01144.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01148.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01143.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01132.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01141.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01138.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01140.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01130.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01136.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01135.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01137.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01133.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01131.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01129.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01128.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01127.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01126.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01125.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01117.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01119.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01116.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01111.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01103.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01105.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01108.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01109.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01110.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01112.x"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01113.x"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01158.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The sugar, biomass and biofuel potential of temperate by tropical maize hybrids</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01158.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The sugar, biomass and biofuel potential of temperate by tropical maize hybrids</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wendy G. White</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael L. Vincent</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen P. Moose</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frederick E. Below</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-22T08:26:02.975896-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01158.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01158.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01158.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The demand for biofuels has created a market for feedstocks to meet future energy requirements. Temperate × tropical maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) hybrids, which combine high biomass and fermentable stalk sugars, have yet to be considered as a biomass feedstock. Our objective was to evaluate biological potential, genetic variability and impact of nitrogen (N) on biomass, stalk sugar, and biofuel potential of temperate × tropical maize (TTM) hybrids. Twelve TTM hybrids, two grain and silage hybrids were grown in 2008, followed in 2009 by seven earshoot-bagged TTM hybrids. In both years, they were grown with and without supplemental N (202 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) in Champaign, IL. Plants were sampled for total and partitioned biomass, and analyzed for concentration and content of sugar. The TTM hybrids were 40% taller, exhibited later reproductive maturity, greater flowering asynchrony, and remained green longer. All hybrids responded to supplemental N by producing more biomass and grain, a lower percent of biomass partitioned to stalk and leaf, whereas TTM also had a decreased concentration of sugar. Total average biomass yields were 24 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> for both the TTM and grain hybrids. However, TTM partitioned 50% more biomass to the stalk and produced 50% more sugar, and had less than half the grain of the commercial hybrids, indicating grain production and sugar accumulation are inversely related. When grain formation was prevented by earshoot bagging, TTM hybrids produced, without supplemental N fertilizer, an average of 4024 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of sugar, which was three- to four-fold greater than the non earshoot-bagged TTM and ear removed hybrid. Calculated estimates for ethanol production, considering the potential from sugar, stover and grain, indicate TTM can yield nearly the amount of ethanol per hectare as modern grain hybrids, but with a decreased requirement for supplemental fertilizer N.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The demand for biofuels has created a market for feedstocks to meet future energy requirements. Temperate × tropical maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids, which combine high biomass and fermentable stalk sugars, have yet to be considered as a biomass feedstock. Our objective was to evaluate biological potential, genetic variability and impact of nitrogen (N) on biomass, stalk sugar, and biofuel potential of temperate × tropical maize (TTM) hybrids. Twelve TTM hybrids, two grain and silage hybrids were grown in 2008, followed in 2009 by seven earshoot-bagged TTM hybrids. In both years, they were grown with and without supplemental N (202 kg ha−1) in Champaign, IL. Plants were sampled for total and partitioned biomass, and analyzed for concentration and content of sugar. The TTM hybrids were 40% taller, exhibited later reproductive maturity, greater flowering asynchrony, and remained green longer. All hybrids responded to supplemental N by producing more biomass and grain, a lower percent of biomass partitioned to stalk and leaf, whereas TTM also had a decreased concentration of sugar. Total average biomass yields were 24 Mg ha−1 for both the TTM and grain hybrids. However, TTM partitioned 50% more biomass to the stalk and produced 50% more sugar, and had less than half the grain of the commercial hybrids, indicating grain production and sugar accumulation are inversely related. When grain formation was prevented by earshoot bagging, TTM hybrids produced, without supplemental N fertilizer, an average of 4024 kg ha−1 of sugar, which was three- to four-fold greater than the non earshoot-bagged TTM and ear removed hybrid. Calculated estimates for ethanol production, considering the potential from sugar, stover and grain, indicate TTM can yield nearly the amount of ethanol per hectare as modern grain hybrids, but with a decreased requirement for supplemental fertilizer N.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01159.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Microalgae for phosphorus removal and biomass production: a six species screen for dual-purpose organisms</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01159.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Microalgae for phosphorus removal and biomass production: a six species screen for dual-purpose organisms</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anil Patel</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suzelle Barrington</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Lefsrud</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-11T01:52:35.245211-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01159.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01159.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2012.01159.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Microalgae biofuel production can be feasible when a second function is added, such as wastewater treatment. Microalgae differ in uptake of phosphorus (P) and growth, making top performer identification fundamental. The objective of this screen was to identify dual-purpose candidates capable of high rates of P removal and growth. Three freshwater – <em>Chlorella</em> sp., <em>Monoraphidium minutum</em> sp., and <em>Scenedesmus</em> sp. – and three marine – <em>Nannochloropsis</em> sp., <em>N. limnetica</em> sp., and <em>Tetraselmis suecica</em> sp. – species were batch cultured in 250 mL flasks over 16 days to quantitate total phosphorus (TP) removal and growth as a function of P loads (control, and 5, 10, and 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> enrichment of control). Experimental design used 100 μmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> of light, a light/dark cycle of 14/10 h, and no CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment. Phosphorus uptake was dependent on species, duration of exposure, and treatment, with significant interaction effects. Growth was dependant on species and treatment. Not all species showed increased P removal with increasing P addition, and no species demonstrated higher growth. <em>Nannochloropsis</em> sp and <em>N. limnetica</em> sp. performed poorly across all treatments. Two dual-purpose candidates were identified. At the 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup> treatment <em>Monoraphidium minutum</em> sp. removed 67.1% (6.66 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ± 0.60 SE) of TP at day 8, 79.3% (7.86 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ± 0.28 SE) at day 16, and biomass accumulation of 0.63 g L<sup>−1</sup> ± 0.06 SE at day 16. At the same treatment <em>Tetraselmis suecica</em> sp. removed 79.4% (6.98 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ± 0.24 SE) TP at day 8, 83.0% (7.30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ± 0.60 SE) at day 16, and biomass of 0.55 g L<sup>−1</sup> ± 0.02 SE at day 16. These species merit further study using high-density wastewater cultures and lipid profiling to assess suitability for a nutrient removal and biomass/biofuel production scheme.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Microalgae biofuel production can be feasible when a second function is added, such as wastewater treatment. Microalgae differ in uptake of phosphorus (P) and growth, making top performer identification fundamental. The objective of this screen was to identify dual-purpose candidates capable of high rates of P removal and growth. Three freshwater – Chlorella sp., Monoraphidium minutum sp., and Scenedesmus sp. – and three marine – Nannochloropsis sp., N. limnetica sp., and Tetraselmis suecica sp. – species were batch cultured in 250 mL flasks over 16 days to quantitate total phosphorus (TP) removal and growth as a function of P loads (control, and 5, 10, and 15 mg L−1 enrichment of control). Experimental design used 100 μmol m−2 s−1 of light, a light/dark cycle of 14/10 h, and no CO2 enrichment. Phosphorus uptake was dependent on species, duration of exposure, and treatment, with significant interaction effects. Growth was dependant on species and treatment. Not all species showed increased P removal with increasing P addition, and no species demonstrated higher growth. Nannochloropsis sp and N. limnetica sp. performed poorly across all treatments. Two dual-purpose candidates were identified. At the 10 mg L−1 treatment Monoraphidium minutum sp. removed 67.1% (6.66 mg L−1 ± 0.60 SE) of TP at day 8, 79.3% (7.86 mg L−1 ± 0.28 SE) at day 16, and biomass accumulation of 0.63 g L−1 ± 0.06 SE at day 16. At the same treatment Tetraselmis suecica sp. removed 79.4% (6.98 mg L−1 ± 0.24 SE) TP at day 8, 83.0% (7.30 mg L−1 ± 0.60 SE) at day 16, and biomass of 0.55 g L−1 ± 0.02 SE at day 16. These species merit further study using high-density wastewater cultures and lipid profiling to assess suitability for a nutrient removal and biomass/biofuel production scheme.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01154.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Greenhouse gas emissions and abatement costs of biofuel production in South Africa</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01154.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greenhouse gas emissions and abatement costs of biofuel production in South Africa</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan Tomaschek</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enver Doruk Özdemir</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ulrich Fahl</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ludger Eltrop</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T01:24:26.26551-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01154.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01154.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01154.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Primary Research Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Transport accounts for about one quarter of South Africa's final energy consumption. Most of the energy used is based on fossil fuels causing significant environmental burdens. This threat becomes even more dominant as a significant growth in transport demand is forecasted, especially in South Africa's economic hub, Gauteng province. The South African government has realized the potential of biofuel usage for reducing oil import dependency and greenhouse gas (GHG) and has hence developed a National Biofuels Industrial Strategy to enforce their use. However, there is limited experience in the country in commercial biofuel production and some of the proposed crops (i.e. rapeseed and sugar beet) have not been yet cultivated on a larger scale. Furthermore, there is only limited research available, looking at the feasibility of commercial scale biofuel production or abatement costs of GHG emissions. To assess the opportunities of biofuel production in South Africa, the production costs and consumer price levels of the fuels recommended by the national strategy are analysed in this article. Moreover, the lifecycle GHG emissions and mitigation costs are calculated compared to the calculated fossil fuel reference including coal to liquid (CTL) and gas to liquid (GTL) fuels. The results show that the cost for biofuel production in South Africa are currently significantly higher (between 30% and 80%) than for the reference fossil fuels. The lifecycle GHG emissions of biofuels (especially for sugar cane) are considerably lower (up to 45%) than the reference fossil GHG emissions. The resulting GHG abatement costs are between 1000 and 2500 ZAR<sub>2007</sub> per saved ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, which is high compared to the current European CO<sub>2</sub> market prices of ca. 143 ZAR<sub>2007</sub> t<sup>−1</sup>. The analysis has shown that biofuel production and utilization in South Africa offers a significant GHG-mitigation potential but at relatively high cost.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Transport accounts for about one quarter of South Africa's final energy consumption. Most of the energy used is based on fossil fuels causing significant environmental burdens. This threat becomes even more dominant as a significant growth in transport demand is forecasted, especially in South Africa's economic hub, Gauteng province. The South African government has realized the potential of biofuel usage for reducing oil import dependency and greenhouse gas (GHG) and has hence developed a National Biofuels Industrial Strategy to enforce their use. However, there is limited experience in the country in commercial biofuel production and some of the proposed crops (i.e. rapeseed and sugar beet) have not been yet cultivated on a larger scale. Furthermore, there is only limited research available, looking at the feasibility of commercial scale biofuel production or abatement costs of GHG emissions. To assess the opportunities of biofuel production in South Africa, the production costs and consumer price levels of the fuels recommended by the national strategy are analysed in this article. Moreover, the lifecycle GHG emissions and mitigation costs are calculated compared to the calculated fossil fuel reference including coal to liquid (CTL) and gas to liquid (GTL) fuels. The results show that the cost for biofuel production in South Africa are currently significantly higher (between 30% and 80%) than for the reference fossil fuels. The lifecycle GHG emissions of biofuels (especially for sugar cane) are considerably lower (up to 45%) than the reference fossil GHG emissions. The resulting GHG abatement costs are between 1000 and 2500 ZAR2007 per saved ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, which is high compared to the current European CO2 market prices of ca. 143 ZAR2007 t−1. The analysis has shown that biofuel production and utilization in South Africa offers a significant GHG-mitigation potential but at relatively high cost.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01156.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Application of probability distributions to the modeling of biogenic CO2 fluxes in life cycle assessment</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01156.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Application of probability distributions to the modeling of biogenic CO2 fluxes in life cycle assessment</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francesco Cherubini</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Guest</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders H. Strømman</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T01:23:50.044798-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01156.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01156.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01156.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In life cycle assessment (LCA), the same characterization factors are conventionally applied irrespective of when the emissions occur (the same importance is given to emissions in the past, present, and future). When the assessment is constrained by fixed timeframes, the appropriateness of this paradigm is questioned and the temporal distribution of emissions becomes of relevance. One typical example is the accounting for biogenic <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions and removals. This article proposes a methodology for assessing the climate impact of time-distributed <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> fluxes using probability distributions. Three selected wood applications, such as fuel, nonstructural panels, and housing construction materials are assessed. In all the cases, <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> sequestration in growing trees is modeled with an appropriate forest growth function, whereas <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions from wood oxidation are modeled with different probability distributions, such as the delta function, the uniform distribution, the exponential distribution, and the chi-square distribution. The combination of these <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> fluxes with the global carbon cycle provides the respective changes caused in <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> atmospheric concentration and hence in the radiative forcing. The latter is then used as basis for climate impact metrics. Results demonstrate the utility of using emission and removal functions rather than single pulses, which generally overestimate the climate impact of <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions, especially in presence of short time horizons. Characterization factors for biogenic <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> are provided for selected combinations of biomass species, rotation periods, and probability distributions. The time discrepancy between biogenic <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions and capture through regrowth results in a certain climate impact, even for a system that is carbon neutral over time. For the oxidation rate of wooden products, the use of a chi-square distribution appears the most reliable and appropriate option under a methodological perspective. The feasibility of its adoption in LCA and emission accounting from harvested wood products deserves further scientific considerations.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>In life cycle assessment (LCA), the same characterization factors are conventionally applied irrespective of when the emissions occur (the same importance is given to emissions in the past, present, and future). When the assessment is constrained by fixed timeframes, the appropriateness of this paradigm is questioned and the temporal distribution of emissions becomes of relevance. One typical example is the accounting for biogenic CO2 emissions and removals. This article proposes a methodology for assessing the climate impact of time-distributed CO2 fluxes using probability distributions. Three selected wood applications, such as fuel, nonstructural panels, and housing construction materials are assessed. In all the cases, CO2 sequestration in growing trees is modeled with an appropriate forest growth function, whereas CO2 emissions from wood oxidation are modeled with different probability distributions, such as the delta function, the uniform distribution, the exponential distribution, and the chi-square distribution. The combination of these CO2 fluxes with the global carbon cycle provides the respective changes caused in CO2 atmospheric concentration and hence in the radiative forcing. The latter is then used as basis for climate impact metrics. Results demonstrate the utility of using emission and removal functions rather than single pulses, which generally overestimate the climate impact of CO2 emissions, especially in presence of short time horizons. Characterization factors for biogenic CO2 are provided for selected combinations of biomass species, rotation periods, and probability distributions. The time discrepancy between biogenic CO2 emissions and capture through regrowth results in a certain climate impact, even for a system that is carbon neutral over time. For the oxidation rate of wooden products, the use of a chi-square distribution appears the most reliable and appropriate option under a methodological perspective. The feasibility of its adoption in LCA and emission accounting from harvested wood products deserves further scientific considerations.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01157.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Yield potential of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01157.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yield potential of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wei Liu</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juan Yan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jianqiang Li</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tao Sang</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-02-01T01:23:22.628051-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01157.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01157.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01157.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Growing second-generation energy crops on marginal land is conceptualized as one of the primary means of future bioenergy development. However, the extent to which marginal land can support energy crop production remains unclear. The Loess Plateau of China, one of the most seriously eroded regions of the world, is particularly rich in marginal land. On the basis of the previous field experiment of planting <em>Miscanthus</em> species in Qingyang of the Gansu Province, herein, we estimated the yield potential of <em>Miscanthus lutarioriparius</em>, the species with the highest biomass, across the Loess Plateau. On the basis of the radiation model previously developed from <em>Miscanthus</em> field trials, annual precipitation was introduced as an additional variable for yield estimate in the semiarid and semihumid regions of the Loess Plateau. Of 62 million hectares (Mha) of the Loess Plateau, our model estimated that 48.7 Mha can potentially support <em>Miscanthus</em> growth, with the average yield of 17.8 t ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. After excluding high-quality cropland and pasture and land suitable for afforestation, a total of 33.3 Mha of presumably marginal land were left available for producing the energy crop at the average yield of 16.8 t ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and the total annual yield of 0.56 billion tons. The analysis of environmental factors indicated that erosion, aridity, and field steepness were the primary contributors to the poor quality of the marginal land. The change of land uses from traditional agriculture to energy crop production may prevent further erosion and land degradation and consequently establish a sustainable economy for the region.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Growing second-generation energy crops on marginal land is conceptualized as one of the primary means of future bioenergy development. However, the extent to which marginal land can support energy crop production remains unclear. The Loess Plateau of China, one of the most seriously eroded regions of the world, is particularly rich in marginal land. On the basis of the previous field experiment of planting Miscanthus species in Qingyang of the Gansu Province, herein, we estimated the yield potential of Miscanthus lutarioriparius, the species with the highest biomass, across the Loess Plateau. On the basis of the radiation model previously developed from Miscanthus field trials, annual precipitation was introduced as an additional variable for yield estimate in the semiarid and semihumid regions of the Loess Plateau. Of 62 million hectares (Mha) of the Loess Plateau, our model estimated that 48.7 Mha can potentially support Miscanthus growth, with the average yield of 17.8 t ha−1 yr−1. After excluding high-quality cropland and pasture and land suitable for afforestation, a total of 33.3 Mha of presumably marginal land were left available for producing the energy crop at the average yield of 16.8 t ha−1 yr−1 and the total annual yield of 0.56 billion tons. The analysis of environmental factors indicated that erosion, aridity, and field steepness were the primary contributors to the poor quality of the marginal land. The change of land uses from traditional agriculture to energy crop production may prevent further erosion and land degradation and consequently establish a sustainable economy for the region.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01153.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Seasonal dynamics of above- and below-ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01153.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seasonal dynamics of above- and below-ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank G. Dohleman</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emily A. Heaton</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rebecca A. Arundale</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen P. Long</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-16T10:40:34.710568-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01153.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The first replicated productivity trials of the C4 perennial grass <em>Miscanthus</em> × <em>giganteus</em> in the United States showed this emerging ligno-cellulosic bioenergy feedstock to provide remarkably high annual yields. This covered the 5 years after planting, leaving it uncertain if this high productivity could be maintained in the absence of N fertilization. An expected, but until now unsubstantiated, benefit of both species was investment in roots and perennating rhizomes. This study examines for years 5–7 yields, biomass, C and N in shoots, roots, and rhizomes. The mean peak shoot biomass for <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> in years 5–7 was 46.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in October, declining to 38.1 t ha<sup>−1</sup> on completion of senescence and at harvest in December, and 20.7 t ha<sup>−1</sup> declining to 11.3 t ha<sup>−1</sup> for <em>Panicum virgatum</em>. There was no evidence of decline in annual yield with age. Mean rhizome biomass was significantly higher in <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> at 21.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to 7.2 t ha<sup>−1</sup> for <em>P. virgatum</em>, whereas root biomass was similar at 5.6–5.9 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> shoots contained 339 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> N in August, declining to 193 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in December, compared to 168 and 58 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for <em>P. virgatum</em>. The results suggest substantial remobilization of N to roots and rhizomes, yet still a substantial loss with December harvests. The shoot and rhizome biomass increase of 33.6 t ha<sup>−1</sup> during the 2-month period between June and August for <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> corresponds to a solar energy conversion of 4.4% of solar energy into biomass, one of the highest recorded and confirming the remarkable productivity potential of this plant.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The first replicated productivity trials of the C4 perennial grass Miscanthus × giganteus in the United States showed this emerging ligno-cellulosic bioenergy feedstock to provide remarkably high annual yields. This covered the 5 years after planting, leaving it uncertain if this high productivity could be maintained in the absence of N fertilization. An expected, but until now unsubstantiated, benefit of both species was investment in roots and perennating rhizomes. This study examines for years 5–7 yields, biomass, C and N in shoots, roots, and rhizomes. The mean peak shoot biomass for M. × giganteus in years 5–7 was 46.5 t ha−1 in October, declining to 38.1 t ha−1 on completion of senescence and at harvest in December, and 20.7 t ha−1 declining to 11.3 t ha−1 for Panicum virgatum. There was no evidence of decline in annual yield with age. Mean rhizome biomass was significantly higher in M. × giganteus at 21.5 t ha−1 compared to 7.2 t ha−1 for P. virgatum, whereas root biomass was similar at 5.6–5.9 t ha−1. M. × giganteus shoots contained 339 kg ha−1 N in August, declining to 193 kg ha−1 in December, compared to 168 and 58 kg ha−1 for P. virgatum. The results suggest substantial remobilization of N to roots and rhizomes, yet still a substantial loss with December harvests. The shoot and rhizome biomass increase of 33.6 t ha−1 during the 2-month period between June and August for M. × giganteus corresponds to a solar energy conversion of 4.4% of solar energy into biomass, one of the highest recorded and confirming the remarkable productivity potential of this plant.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01151.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Farmers' perspectives for the development of a bioenergy industry in Ireland</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01151.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farmers' perspectives for the development of a bioenergy industry in Ireland</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cara A. Augustenborg</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Finnan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leah McBennett</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivienne Connolly</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Uta Priegnitz</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christoph Müller</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-09T23:43:09.655713-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01151.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01151.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01151.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A survey of Irish farmers was conducted to identify farmers’ opinions on energy crop production and to characterize potential adopters of energy crop cultivation in Ireland. One hundred and seventy-two surveys were completed from 25 counties in Ireland. <em>Miscanthus</em> (48%) and grass (30%) were the preferred crops for adoption of energy crop production. Potential adopters described themselves as having a significantly greater level of knowledge of energy crop production compared with other respondents. The results indicate that lack of interest in adopting energy crop production may be due to lack of knowledge regarding the economic benefits of adoption and the variety of energy crops available for cultivation in Ireland. The establishment of long-term contracts and government schemes were identified as important requirements for the development of bioenergy crop production in Ireland. Energy crop adoption was not limited to farmers undertaking specific farm enterprises. Farmers were motivated to adopt energy crop production for both economic and environmental benefits. These results are the first to provide valuable information on the perspectives of potential adopters of bioenergy crop production in Ireland for the promotion and implementation of a national bioenergy industry. Policy requirements and outreach strategies to encourage adoption of energy crops by agricultural producers are suggested.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>A survey of Irish farmers was conducted to identify farmers’ opinions on energy crop production and to characterize potential adopters of energy crop cultivation in Ireland. One hundred and seventy-two surveys were completed from 25 counties in Ireland. Miscanthus (48%) and grass (30%) were the preferred crops for adoption of energy crop production. Potential adopters described themselves as having a significantly greater level of knowledge of energy crop production compared with other respondents. The results indicate that lack of interest in adopting energy crop production may be due to lack of knowledge regarding the economic benefits of adoption and the variety of energy crops available for cultivation in Ireland. The establishment of long-term contracts and government schemes were identified as important requirements for the development of bioenergy crop production in Ireland. Energy crop adoption was not limited to farmers undertaking specific farm enterprises. Farmers were motivated to adopt energy crop production for both economic and environmental benefits. These results are the first to provide valuable information on the perspectives of potential adopters of bioenergy crop production in Ireland for the promotion and implementation of a national bioenergy industry. Policy requirements and outreach strategies to encourage adoption of energy crops by agricultural producers are suggested.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01152.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Projection of the future EU forest CO2 sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01152.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Projection of the future EU forest CO2 sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hannes Böttcher</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pieter Johannes Verkerk</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mykola Gusti</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Petr HavlÍk</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Giacomo Grassi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-09T23:41:58.263125-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01152.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01152.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01152.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Forests of the European Union (EU) have been intensively managed for decades, and they have formed a significant sink for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the atmosphere over the past 50 years. The reasons for this behavior are multiple, among them are: forest aging, area expansion, increasing plant productivity due to environmental changes of many kinds, and, most importantly, the growth rates of European forest having been higher than harvest rates. EU countries have agreed to reduce total emissions of GHG by 20% in 2020 compared to 1990, excluding the forest sink.</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A relevant question for climate policy is: how long will the current sink of EU forests be maintained in the near future? And could it be affected by other mitigation measures such as bioenergy? In this article we assess tradeoffs of bioenergy use and carbon sequestration at large scale and describe results of the comparison of two advanced forest management models that are used to project CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and removals from EU forests until 2030. EFISCEN, a detailed statistical matrix model and G4M, a geographically explicit economic forestry model, use scenarios of future harvest rates and forest growth information to estimate the future carbon balance of forest biomass. Two scenarios were assessed: the EU baseline scenario and the EU reference scenario (including additional bioenergy and climate policies).</p></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Our projections suggest a significant decline of the sink until 2030 in the baseline scenario of about 25–40% (or 65–125 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>) compared to the models’ 2010 estimate. Including additional bioenergy targets of EU member states has an effect on the development of this sink, which is not accounted in the EU emission reduction target. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the role of future wood demand and proved the importance of this driver for the future sink development.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Forests of the European Union (EU) have been intensively managed for decades, and they have formed a significant sink for carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere over the past 50 years. The reasons for this behavior are multiple, among them are: forest aging, area expansion, increasing plant productivity due to environmental changes of many kinds, and, most importantly, the growth rates of European forest having been higher than harvest rates. EU countries have agreed to reduce total emissions of GHG by 20% in 2020 compared to 1990, excluding the forest sink.A relevant question for climate policy is: how long will the current sink of EU forests be maintained in the near future? And could it be affected by other mitigation measures such as bioenergy? In this article we assess tradeoffs of bioenergy use and carbon sequestration at large scale and describe results of the comparison of two advanced forest management models that are used to project CO2 emissions and removals from EU forests until 2030. EFISCEN, a detailed statistical matrix model and G4M, a geographically explicit economic forestry model, use scenarios of future harvest rates and forest growth information to estimate the future carbon balance of forest biomass. Two scenarios were assessed: the EU baseline scenario and the EU reference scenario (including additional bioenergy and climate policies).Our projections suggest a significant decline of the sink until 2030 in the baseline scenario of about 25–40% (or 65–125 Mt CO2) compared to the models’ 2010 estimate. Including additional bioenergy targets of EU member states has an effect on the development of this sink, which is not accounted in the EU emission reduction target. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the role of future wood demand and proved the importance of this driver for the future sink development.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01145.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Modeling biogeochemical impacts of bioenergy buffers with perennial grasses for a row-crop field in Illinois</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01145.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Modeling biogeochemical impacts of bioenergy buffers with perennial grasses for a row-crop field in Illinois</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gayathri Gopalakrishnan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MARIA Cristina Negri</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William Salas</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-09T23:41:50.922488-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01145.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01145.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01145.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Current research on the environmental sustainability of bioenergy has largely focused on the potential of bioenergy crops to sequester carbon and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and possible impacts on water quality and quantity. A key assumption in these studies is that bioenergy crops will be grown in a manner similar to current agricultural crops such as corn and hence would affect the environment similarly. In this study, we investigate an alternative cropping system where bioenergy crops are grown in buffer strips adjacent to current agricultural crops such that nutrients present in runoff and leachate from the traditional row-crops are reused by the bioenergy crops (switchgrass, miscanthus and native prairie grasses) in the buffer strips, thus providing environmental services and meeting economic needs of farmers. The process-based biogeochemical model Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) was used to simulate crop yield, nitrous oxide production and nitrate concentrations in leachate for a typical agricultural field in Illinois. Model parameters have been developed for the first time for miscanthus and switchgrass in DNDC. Results from model simulations indicated that growing bioenergy crops in buffer strips mitigated nutrient runoff, reduced nitrate concentrations in leachate by 60–70% and resulted in a reduction of 50–90% in nitrous oxide emissions compared with traditional cropping systems. While all the bioenergy crop buffers had significant positive environmental benefits, switchgrass performed the best with respect to minimizing nutrient runoff and nitrous oxide emissions, while miscanthus had the highest yield. Overall, our model results indicated that the bioenergy crops grown in these buffer strips achieved yields that are comparable to those obtained for traditional agricultural systems while simultaneously providing environmental services and could be used to design sustainable agricultural landscapes.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Current research on the environmental sustainability of bioenergy has largely focused on the potential of bioenergy crops to sequester carbon and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and possible impacts on water quality and quantity. A key assumption in these studies is that bioenergy crops will be grown in a manner similar to current agricultural crops such as corn and hence would affect the environment similarly. In this study, we investigate an alternative cropping system where bioenergy crops are grown in buffer strips adjacent to current agricultural crops such that nutrients present in runoff and leachate from the traditional row-crops are reused by the bioenergy crops (switchgrass, miscanthus and native prairie grasses) in the buffer strips, thus providing environmental services and meeting economic needs of farmers. The process-based biogeochemical model Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) was used to simulate crop yield, nitrous oxide production and nitrate concentrations in leachate for a typical agricultural field in Illinois. Model parameters have been developed for the first time for miscanthus and switchgrass in DNDC. Results from model simulations indicated that growing bioenergy crops in buffer strips mitigated nutrient runoff, reduced nitrate concentrations in leachate by 60–70% and resulted in a reduction of 50–90% in nitrous oxide emissions compared with traditional cropping systems. While all the bioenergy crop buffers had significant positive environmental benefits, switchgrass performed the best with respect to minimizing nutrient runoff and nitrous oxide emissions, while miscanthus had the highest yield. Overall, our model results indicated that the bioenergy crops grown in these buffer strips achieved yields that are comparable to those obtained for traditional agricultural systems while simultaneously providing environmental services and could be used to design sustainable agricultural landscapes.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01155.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Water use in a sugarcane plantation</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01155.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Water use in a sugarcane plantation</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Osvaldo M. R. Cabral</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Humberto R. Rocha</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John H. Gash</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcos A. V. Ligo</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonatan D. Tatsch</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helber C. Freitas</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emília Brasilio</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-09T23:41:01.753746-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01155.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01155.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01155.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The evapotranspiration (<em>E</em>) from a sugarcane plantation in the southeast Brazil was measured by the eddy-covariance method during two consecutive cycles. These represented the second (393 days) and third year (374 days) re-growth (ratoon). The total <em>E</em> in the first cycle was 829 mm, accounting for 69% of rainfall, whereas in the second cycle, it was 690 mm, despite the total rainfall (1353 mm) being 13% greater. The ratio of <em>E</em> to available energy, the evaporative fraction, exhibited a smaller variation between the first and second cycles: 0.58 and 0.51, respectively. The estimated interception losses were 88 and 90 mm, respectively, accounting for approximately 7% of the total rainfall. The sugarcane yield in the second cycle (61.5 ± 4.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) was 26% lower than the first cycle, as well as lower than the regional average for the third ratoon (76 t ha<sup>−1</sup>). The below average yield was associated with less available soil water at the beginning of the cycle, with the amount of rainfall recorded during the first 120 days of re-growth in the second cycle being 16% of that recorded in the first (203 mm).</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The evapotranspiration (E) from a sugarcane plantation in the southeast Brazil was measured by the eddy-covariance method during two consecutive cycles. These represented the second (393 days) and third year (374 days) re-growth (ratoon). The total E in the first cycle was 829 mm, accounting for 69% of rainfall, whereas in the second cycle, it was 690 mm, despite the total rainfall (1353 mm) being 13% greater. The ratio of E to available energy, the evaporative fraction, exhibited a smaller variation between the first and second cycles: 0.58 and 0.51, respectively. The estimated interception losses were 88 and 90 mm, respectively, accounting for approximately 7% of the total rainfall. The sugarcane yield in the second cycle (61.5 ± 4.0 t ha−1) was 26% lower than the first cycle, as well as lower than the regional average for the third ratoon (76 t ha−1). The below average yield was associated with less available soil water at the beginning of the cycle, with the amount of rainfall recorded during the first 120 days of re-growth in the second cycle being 16% of that recorded in the first (203 mm).</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01147.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Spatiotemporal land use modelling to assess land availability for energy crops – illustrated for Mozambique</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01147.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spatiotemporal land use modelling to assess land availability for energy crops – illustrated for Mozambique</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Floor Hilst</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Judith A. Verstegen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derek Karssenberg</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">André P. C. Faaij</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-22T07:37:52.965957-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01147.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01147.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01147.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A method and tool have been developed to assess future developments in land availability for bioenergy crops in a spatially explicit way, while taking into account both the developments in other land use functions, such as land for food, livestock and material production, and the uncertainties in the key determinant factors of land use change (LUC). This spatiotemporal LUC model is demonstrated with a case study on the developments in the land availability for bioenergy crops in Mozambique in the timeframe 2005–2030. The developments in the main drivers for agricultural land use, demand for food, animal products and materials were assessed, based on the projected developments in population, diet, GDP and self-sufficiency ratio. Two scenarios were developed: a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario and a progressive scenario. Land allocation was based on land use class-specific sets of suitability factors. The LUC dynamics were mapped on a 1 km<sup>2</sup> grid level for each individual year up to 2030. In the BAU scenario, 7.7 Mha and in the progressive scenario 16.4 Mha could become available for bioenergy crop production in 2030. Based on the Monte Carlo analysis, a 95% confidence interval of the amount of land available and the spatially explicit probability of available land was found. The bottom-up approach, the number of dynamic land uses, the diverse portfolio of LUC drivers and suitability factors, and the possibility to model uncertainty mean that this model is a step forward in modelling land availability for bioenergy potentials.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>A method and tool have been developed to assess future developments in land availability for bioenergy crops in a spatially explicit way, while taking into account both the developments in other land use functions, such as land for food, livestock and material production, and the uncertainties in the key determinant factors of land use change (LUC). This spatiotemporal LUC model is demonstrated with a case study on the developments in the land availability for bioenergy crops in Mozambique in the timeframe 2005–2030. The developments in the main drivers for agricultural land use, demand for food, animal products and materials were assessed, based on the projected developments in population, diet, GDP and self-sufficiency ratio. Two scenarios were developed: a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario and a progressive scenario. Land allocation was based on land use class-specific sets of suitability factors. The LUC dynamics were mapped on a 1 km2 grid level for each individual year up to 2030. In the BAU scenario, 7.7 Mha and in the progressive scenario 16.4 Mha could become available for bioenergy crop production in 2030. Based on the Monte Carlo analysis, a 95% confidence interval of the amount of land available and the spatially explicit probability of available land was found. The bottom-up approach, the number of dynamic land uses, the diverse portfolio of LUC drivers and suitability factors, and the possibility to model uncertainty mean that this model is a step forward in modelling land availability for bioenergy potentials.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01149.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01149.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Giuliana Zanchi</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Naomi Pena</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil Bird</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-22T07:31:28.81342-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01149.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01149.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01149.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Under the current accounting systems, emissions produced when biomass is burnt for energy are accounted as zero, resulting in what is referred to as the ‘carbon neutrality’ assumption. However, if current harvest levels are increased to produce more bioenergy, carbon that would have been stored in the biosphere might be instead released in the atmosphere. This study utilizes a comparative approach that considers emissions under alternative energy supply options. This approach shows that the emission benefits of bioenergy compared to use of fossil fuel are time-dependent. It emerges that the assumption that bioenergy always results in zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to use of fossil fuels can be misleading, particularly in the context of short-to-medium term goals. While it is clear that all sources of woody bioenergy from sustainably managed forests will produce emission reductions in the long term, different woody biomass sources have various impacts in the short-medium term. The study shows that the use of forest residues that are easily decomposable can produce GHG benefits compared to use of fossil fuels from the beginning of their use and that biomass from dedicated plantations established on marginal land can be carbon neutral from the beginning of its use. However, the risk of short-to-medium term negative impacts is high when additional fellings are extracted to produce bioenergy and the proportion of felled biomass used for bioenergy is low, or when land with high C stocks is converted to low productivity bioenergy plantations. The method used in the study provides an instrument to identify the time-dependent pattern of emission reductions for alternative bioenergy sources. In this way, decision makers can evaluate which bioenergy options are most beneficial for meeting short-term GHG emission reduction goals and which ones are more appropriate for medium to longer term objectives.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Under the current accounting systems, emissions produced when biomass is burnt for energy are accounted as zero, resulting in what is referred to as the ‘carbon neutrality’ assumption. However, if current harvest levels are increased to produce more bioenergy, carbon that would have been stored in the biosphere might be instead released in the atmosphere. This study utilizes a comparative approach that considers emissions under alternative energy supply options. This approach shows that the emission benefits of bioenergy compared to use of fossil fuel are time-dependent. It emerges that the assumption that bioenergy always results in zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to use of fossil fuels can be misleading, particularly in the context of short-to-medium term goals. While it is clear that all sources of woody bioenergy from sustainably managed forests will produce emission reductions in the long term, different woody biomass sources have various impacts in the short-medium term. The study shows that the use of forest residues that are easily decomposable can produce GHG benefits compared to use of fossil fuels from the beginning of their use and that biomass from dedicated plantations established on marginal land can be carbon neutral from the beginning of its use. However, the risk of short-to-medium term negative impacts is high when additional fellings are extracted to produce bioenergy and the proportion of felled biomass used for bioenergy is low, or when land with high C stocks is converted to low productivity bioenergy plantations. The method used in the study provides an instrument to identify the time-dependent pattern of emission reductions for alternative bioenergy sources. In this way, decision makers can evaluate which bioenergy options are most beneficial for meeting short-term GHG emission reduction goals and which ones are more appropriate for medium to longer term objectives.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01150.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01150.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fernando E. Miguez</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Maughan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Germán A. Bollero</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen P. Long</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-16T02:59:48.835323-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01150.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01150.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01150.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>C<sub>4</sub> perennial grasses are being considered as environmentally and economically sustainable high yielding bioenergy feedstocks. Temporal and spatial variation in yield across the conterminious United States is uncertain due to the limited number of field trials. Here, we use a semi-mechanistic dynamic crop growth and production model to explore the potential of <em>Miscanthus </em>× <em>giganteus</em> (Greef et. Deu.) and <em>Panicum virgatum</em> L. across the conterminous United States. By running the model for 32 years (1979–2010), we were able to estimate dry biomass production and stability. The maximum rainfed simulated end-of-growth-season harvestable biomass for <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> was ca. 40 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> and ca. 20 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> for <em>P. virgatum</em>. In addition, regions of the southeastern United States were identified as promising due to their high potential production and stability and their relative advantage when compared with county-level maize biomass production. Regional and temporal variation was most strongly influenced by precipitation and soil water holding capacity. <em>Miscanthus</em> × <em>giganteus</em> was on average 2.2 times more productive than <em>P. virgatum</em> for locations where yields were ≥10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. The predictive ability of the model for <em>P. virgatum</em> was tested with 30 previously published studies covering the eastern half of the United States and resulted in an index of agreement of 0.71 and a mean bias of only −0.62 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> showing that, on average, the model tended to only slightly overestimate productivity. This study provides with potential production and variability which can be used for regional assessment of the suitability of dedicated bioenergy crops.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>C4 perennial grasses are being considered as environmentally and economically sustainable high yielding bioenergy feedstocks. Temporal and spatial variation in yield across the conterminious United States is uncertain due to the limited number of field trials. Here, we use a semi-mechanistic dynamic crop growth and production model to explore the potential of Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et. Deu.) and Panicum virgatum L. across the conterminous United States. By running the model for 32 years (1979–2010), we were able to estimate dry biomass production and stability. The maximum rainfed simulated end-of-growth-season harvestable biomass for M. × giganteus was ca. 40 Mg ha−1 and ca. 20 Mg ha−1 for P. virgatum. In addition, regions of the southeastern United States were identified as promising due to their high potential production and stability and their relative advantage when compared with county-level maize biomass production. Regional and temporal variation was most strongly influenced by precipitation and soil water holding capacity. Miscanthus × giganteus was on average 2.2 times more productive than P. virgatum for locations where yields were ≥10 Mg ha−1. The predictive ability of the model for P. virgatum was tested with 30 previously published studies covering the eastern half of the United States and resulted in an index of agreement of 0.71 and a mean bias of only −0.62 Mg ha−1 showing that, on average, the model tended to only slightly overestimate productivity. This study provides with potential production and variability which can be used for regional assessment of the suitability of dedicated bioenergy crops.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01142.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The contribution of switchgrass in reducing GHG emissions</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01142.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The contribution of switchgrass in reducing GHG emissions</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrea Monti</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lorenzo Barbanti</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alessandro Zatta</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walter Zegada-Lizarazu</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-09T06:28:29.469828-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01142.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01142.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01142.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The contribution of switchgrass (<em>Panicum virgatum</em> L.), a perennial C<sub>4</sub> grass, in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was reviewed under three main areas; the impact on carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), and methane emissions (CH<sub>4</sub>), whilst also taking into account the effects of land conversion to switchgrass. Switchgrass is able to enhance biomass accumulation in a wide range of environmental conditions, which is the premise for considerable carbon assimilation and storage in the belowground organs. The progress in some areas of crop husbandry (e.g., tillage and fertilization) has fostered benefits for carbon storage, while restraining GHG emissions. As root biomass is the main indicator of soil carbon sequestration, switchgrass's dense and deep rooting is a relevant advantage, although uncertainty still exists about the crop's belowground biomass accumulation. In agreement with this, most LCA studies addressing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions report significant benefits from switchgrass cultivation and processing. Beside CO<sub>2</sub>, switchgrass performed better than most other biomass crops also in terms of N<sub>2</sub>O emission. In the case of CH<sub>4</sub> emission, it may be argued that switchgrass should act as a moderate sink, i.e., contributing to mitigate CH<sub>4</sub> atmospheric concentration, but a substantial lack of information indicates the need for specific research on the topic. Land conversion to switchgrass is the latest issue which needs to be addressed in LCA studies: not surprisingly, the net CO<sub>2</sub> abatement appears remarkable if switchgrass is grown in former arable lands, although it is slightly negative to positive if switchgrass replaces permanent grassland. In conclusion, switchgrass could significantly contribute to mitigate GHG emissions, although areas of uncertainty still exist in the assessment of soil carbon storage, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and the effects of converting lands to switchgrass. Further improvements must, therefore, be achieved to strengthen the crop's remarkable sustainability.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The contribution of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), a perennial C4 grass, in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was reviewed under three main areas; the impact on carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane emissions (CH4), whilst also taking into account the effects of land conversion to switchgrass. Switchgrass is able to enhance biomass accumulation in a wide range of environmental conditions, which is the premise for considerable carbon assimilation and storage in the belowground organs. The progress in some areas of crop husbandry (e.g., tillage and fertilization) has fostered benefits for carbon storage, while restraining GHG emissions. As root biomass is the main indicator of soil carbon sequestration, switchgrass's dense and deep rooting is a relevant advantage, although uncertainty still exists about the crop's belowground biomass accumulation. In agreement with this, most LCA studies addressing CO2 emissions report significant benefits from switchgrass cultivation and processing. Beside CO2, switchgrass performed better than most other biomass crops also in terms of N2O emission. In the case of CH4 emission, it may be argued that switchgrass should act as a moderate sink, i.e., contributing to mitigate CH4 atmospheric concentration, but a substantial lack of information indicates the need for specific research on the topic. Land conversion to switchgrass is the latest issue which needs to be addressed in LCA studies: not surprisingly, the net CO2 abatement appears remarkable if switchgrass is grown in former arable lands, although it is slightly negative to positive if switchgrass replaces permanent grassland. In conclusion, switchgrass could significantly contribute to mitigate GHG emissions, although areas of uncertainty still exist in the assessment of soil carbon storage, N2O and CH4 emissions, and the effects of converting lands to switchgrass. Further improvements must, therefore, be achieved to strengthen the crop's remarkable sustainability.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01144.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Miscanthus × giganteus productivity: the effects of management in different environments</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01144.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miscanthus × giganteus productivity: the effects of management in different environments</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Maughan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Germán Bollero</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. K. Lee</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Darmody</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stacy Bonos</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Cortese</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Murphy</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roch Gaussoin</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Sousek</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Williams</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linda Williams</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fernando Miguez</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Voigt</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-05T20:27:28.527598-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01144.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01144.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01144.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> × <em>giganteus</em> is a C<sub>4</sub> perennial grass that shows great potential as a high-yielding biomass crop. Scant research has been published that reports <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> growth and biomass yields in different environments in the United States. This study investigated the establishment success, plant growth, and dry biomass yield of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> during its first three seasons at four locations (Urbana, IL; Lexington, KY; Mead, NE; Adelphia, NJ) in the United States. Three nitrogen rates (0, 60, and 120 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) were applied at each location each year. Good survival of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> during its first winter was observed at KY, NE, and NJ (79–100%), and poor survival at IL (25%), due to late planting and cold winter temperatures. Site soil conditions, and growing-season precipitation and temperature had the greatest impact on dry biomass yield between season 2 (2009) and season 3 (2010). Ideal 2010 weather conditions at NE resulted in significant yield increases (<em>P </em>&lt; 0.0001) of 15.6–27.4 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> from 2009 to 2010. Small yield increases in KY of 17.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2009 to 19.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2010 could be attributed to excessive spring rain and hot dry conditions late in the growing season. Average <em>M</em>. ×<em>giganteus</em> biomass yields in NJ decreased from 16.9 to 9.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> between 2009 and 2010 and were related to hot dry weather, and poor soil conditions. Season 3 yields were positively correlated with end-of-season plant height (<img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01144.x/asset/equation/gcbb1144-math-0001.gif?v=1&amp;t=gyzvm6ai&amp;s=2c4cdd52e971c19bc3635dd1670ba5267889b606" class="inlineGraphic"/>) and tiller density (<img alt="inline image" src="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01144.x/asset/equation/gcbb1144-math-0002.gif?v=1&amp;t=gyzvm6aj&amp;s=311333132e3ee78bf46f8e46975f51b2214d267d" class="inlineGraphic"/>). Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on plant height, tiller density, or dry biomass yield at any of the sites during 2009 or 2010.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Miscanthus × giganteus is a C4 perennial grass that shows great potential as a high-yielding biomass crop. Scant research has been published that reports M. × giganteus growth and biomass yields in different environments in the United States. This study investigated the establishment success, plant growth, and dry biomass yield of M. × giganteus during its first three seasons at four locations (Urbana, IL; Lexington, KY; Mead, NE; Adelphia, NJ) in the United States. Three nitrogen rates (0, 60, and 120 kg ha−1) were applied at each location each year. Good survival of M. × giganteus during its first winter was observed at KY, NE, and NJ (79–100%), and poor survival at IL (25%), due to late planting and cold winter temperatures. Site soil conditions, and growing-season precipitation and temperature had the greatest impact on dry biomass yield between season 2 (2009) and season 3 (2010). Ideal 2010 weather conditions at NE resulted in significant yield increases (P &lt; 0.0001) of 15.6–27.4 Mg ha−1 from 2009 to 2010. Small yield increases in KY of 17.1 Mg ha−1 in 2009 to 19.0 Mg ha−1 in 2010 could be attributed to excessive spring rain and hot dry conditions late in the growing season. Average M. ×giganteus biomass yields in NJ decreased from 16.9 to 9.7 Mg ha−1 between 2009 and 2010 and were related to hot dry weather, and poor soil conditions. Season 3 yields were positively correlated with end-of-season plant height (ρ̂=0.91) and tiller density (ρ̂=0.76). Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on plant height, tiller density, or dry biomass yield at any of the sites during 2009 or 2010.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01148.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Effects of temperature, illumination and node position on stem propagation of Miscanthus × giganteus</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01148.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Effects of temperature, illumination and node position on stem propagation of Miscanthus × giganteus</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicholas N. Boersma</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emily A. Heaton</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-12-05T20:20:47.19275-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01148.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01148.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01148.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The sterile triploid <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> × <em>giganteus</em> is capable of yielding more biomass per unit land area than most other temperate crops. Although the yield potential of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> is high, sterility requires all propagation of the plant to be done vegetatively. The traditional rhizome propagation system achieves relatively low multiplication rates, i.e. the number of new plants generated from a single-parent plant, and requires tillage that leaves soil vulnerable to CO<sub>2</sub> and erosion losses. A stem-based propagation system is used in related crops like sugarcane, and may prove a viable alternative, but the environmental conditions required for shoot initiation from stems of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> are unknown. A study was conducted to investigate the effect of temperature, illumination and node position on emergence of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> shoots. Stems of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> were cut into segments with a single node each, placed in controlled environments under varied soil temperature or light regimes and the number of emerged shoots were evaluated daily for 21 days. At temperatures of 20 and 25 °C, rhizomes produced significantly more shoots than did stem segments (<em>P </em>= 0.0105 and 0.0594, respectively), but the difference was not significant at 30 °C, where 63% of stems produced shoots compared to 80% of rhizomes (<em>P </em>= 0.2037). There was a strong positive effect (<em>P </em>= 0.0086) of soil temperature on emergence in the range of temperatures studied here (15–30 °C). Node positions higher on the stem were less likely to emerge (<em>P </em>&lt; 0.0001) with a significant interaction between illumination and node position. Planting the lowest five nodes from stems of <em>M</em>. × <em>giganteus</em> in 30 °C soil in the light resulted in 75% emergence, which represents a potential multiplication rate 10–12 times greater than that of the current rhizome-based system.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The sterile triploid Miscanthus × giganteus is capable of yielding more biomass per unit land area than most other temperate crops. Although the yield potential of M. × giganteus is high, sterility requires all propagation of the plant to be done vegetatively. The traditional rhizome propagation system achieves relatively low multiplication rates, i.e. the number of new plants generated from a single-parent plant, and requires tillage that leaves soil vulnerable to CO2 and erosion losses. A stem-based propagation system is used in related crops like sugarcane, and may prove a viable alternative, but the environmental conditions required for shoot initiation from stems of M. × giganteus are unknown. A study was conducted to investigate the effect of temperature, illumination and node position on emergence of M. × giganteus shoots. Stems of M. × giganteus were cut into segments with a single node each, placed in controlled environments under varied soil temperature or light regimes and the number of emerged shoots were evaluated daily for 21 days. At temperatures of 20 and 25 °C, rhizomes produced significantly more shoots than did stem segments (P = 0.0105 and 0.0594, respectively), but the difference was not significant at 30 °C, where 63% of stems produced shoots compared to 80% of rhizomes (P = 0.2037). There was a strong positive effect (P = 0.0086) of soil temperature on emergence in the range of temperatures studied here (15–30 °C). Node positions higher on the stem were less likely to emerge (P &lt; 0.0001) with a significant interaction between illumination and node position. Planting the lowest five nodes from stems of M. × giganteus in 30 °C soil in the light resulted in 75% emergence, which represents a potential multiplication rate 10–12 times greater than that of the current rhizome-based system.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01143.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Using a Strategic Environmental Assessment framework to quantify the environmental impact of bioenergy plans</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01143.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Using a Strategic Environmental Assessment framework to quantify the environmental impact of bioenergy plans</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Finnan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Styles</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joanne Fitzgerald</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Connolly</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alison Donnelly</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-30T02:08:00.290425-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01143.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01143.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01143.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Renewable energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets are driving an acceleration in the use of bioenergy resources. The environmental impact of national and regional development plans must be assessed in compliance with the EU Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive (2001/42/EC). Here, we quantify the environmental impact of an Irish Government bioenergy plan to replace 30% of peat used in three peat-burning power stations, located within the midlands region, with biomass. Four plan alternatives for supplying biomass to the power plant were considered in this study: (1) importation of palm kernel shell from south-east Asia, (2) importation of olive cake pellets from Spain and (3) growing either willow or (4) <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> in the vicinity of the power stations. The impact of each alternative on each of the environmental receptors proposed in the SEA Directive was first quantified before the data were normalized on either an Irish, regional or global scale. Positive environmental impacts were very small compared to the negative environmental impacts for each of the plan alternatives considered. Comparison of normalized indicator values confirmed that the adverse environmental consequences of each plan alternative are concentrated at the location where the biomass is produced. The analysis showed that the adverse environmental consequences of biomass importation are substantially greater than those associated with the use of willow and <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> grown on former grassland. The use of olive cake pellets had a greater adverse environmental effect compared to the use of peat whereas replacement of peat with either willow or <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> feedstocks led to a substantial reduction in environmental pressure. The proposed assessment framework combines the scope of SEA with the quantitative benefits of life cycle assessment and can be used to evaluate the environmental consequences of bioenergy plans.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Renewable energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets are driving an acceleration in the use of bioenergy resources. The environmental impact of national and regional development plans must be assessed in compliance with the EU Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive (2001/42/EC). Here, we quantify the environmental impact of an Irish Government bioenergy plan to replace 30% of peat used in three peat-burning power stations, located within the midlands region, with biomass. Four plan alternatives for supplying biomass to the power plant were considered in this study: (1) importation of palm kernel shell from south-east Asia, (2) importation of olive cake pellets from Spain and (3) growing either willow or (4) Miscanthus in the vicinity of the power stations. The impact of each alternative on each of the environmental receptors proposed in the SEA Directive was first quantified before the data were normalized on either an Irish, regional or global scale. Positive environmental impacts were very small compared to the negative environmental impacts for each of the plan alternatives considered. Comparison of normalized indicator values confirmed that the adverse environmental consequences of each plan alternative are concentrated at the location where the biomass is produced. The analysis showed that the adverse environmental consequences of biomass importation are substantially greater than those associated with the use of willow and Miscanthus grown on former grassland. The use of olive cake pellets had a greater adverse environmental effect compared to the use of peat whereas replacement of peat with either willow or Miscanthus feedstocks led to a substantial reduction in environmental pressure. The proposed assessment framework combines the scope of SEA with the quantitative benefits of life cycle assessment and can be used to evaluate the environmental consequences of bioenergy plans.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01132.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Consequences of field N2O emissions for the environmental sustainability of plant-based biofuels produced within an organic farming system</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01132.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Consequences of field N2O emissions for the environmental sustainability of plant-based biofuels produced within an organic farming system</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mette S. Carter</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan Heiske</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Morten Jensen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sune T. Thomsen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jens E. Schmidt</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders Johansen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Per Ambus</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-22T03:01:08.322332-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01132.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01132.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01132.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>One way of reducing the emissions of fossil fuel-derived carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is to replace fossil fuels with biofuels produced from agricultural biomasses or residuals. However, cultivation of soils results in emission of other greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Previous studies on biofuel production systems showed that emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O may counterbalance a substantial part of the global warming reduction, which is achieved by fossil fuel displacement. In this study, we related measured field emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O to the reduction in fossil fuel-derived CO<sub>2</sub>, which was obtained when agricultural biomasses were used for biofuel production. The analysis included five organically managed feedstocks (viz. dried straw of sole cropped rye, sole cropped vetch and intercropped rye–vetch, as well as fresh grass–clover and whole crop maize) and three scenarios for conversion of biomass into biofuel. The scenarios were (i) bioethanol, (ii) biogas and (iii) coproduction of bioethanol and biogas. In the last scenario, the biomass was first used for bioethanol fermentation and subsequently the effluent from this process was utilized for biogas production. The net GHG reduction was calculated as the avoided fossil fuel-derived CO<sub>2</sub>, where the N<sub>2</sub>O emission was subtracted. This value did not account for fossil fuel-derived CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from farm machinery and during conversion processes that turn biomass into biofuel. The greatest net GHG reduction, corresponding to 700–800 g CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup>, was obtained by biogas production or coproduction of bioethanol and biogas on either fresh grass–clover or whole crop maize. In contrast, biofuel production based on lignocellulosic crop residues (i.e. rye and vetch straw) provided considerably lower net GHG reductions (≤215 g CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup>), and even negative numbers sometimes. No GHG benefit was achieved by fertilizing the maize crop because the extra crop yield, and thereby increased biofuel production, was offset by enhanced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>One way of reducing the emissions of fossil fuel-derived carbon dioxide (CO2) is to replace fossil fuels with biofuels produced from agricultural biomasses or residuals. However, cultivation of soils results in emission of other greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially nitrous oxide (N2O). Previous studies on biofuel production systems showed that emissions of N2O may counterbalance a substantial part of the global warming reduction, which is achieved by fossil fuel displacement. In this study, we related measured field emissions of N2O to the reduction in fossil fuel-derived CO2, which was obtained when agricultural biomasses were used for biofuel production. The analysis included five organically managed feedstocks (viz. dried straw of sole cropped rye, sole cropped vetch and intercropped rye–vetch, as well as fresh grass–clover and whole crop maize) and three scenarios for conversion of biomass into biofuel. The scenarios were (i) bioethanol, (ii) biogas and (iii) coproduction of bioethanol and biogas. In the last scenario, the biomass was first used for bioethanol fermentation and subsequently the effluent from this process was utilized for biogas production. The net GHG reduction was calculated as the avoided fossil fuel-derived CO2, where the N2O emission was subtracted. This value did not account for fossil fuel-derived CO2 emissions from farm machinery and during conversion processes that turn biomass into biofuel. The greatest net GHG reduction, corresponding to 700–800 g CO2 m−2, was obtained by biogas production or coproduction of bioethanol and biogas on either fresh grass–clover or whole crop maize. In contrast, biofuel production based on lignocellulosic crop residues (i.e. rye and vetch straw) provided considerably lower net GHG reductions (≤215 g CO2 m−2), and even negative numbers sometimes. No GHG benefit was achieved by fertilizing the maize crop because the extra crop yield, and thereby increased biofuel production, was offset by enhanced N2O emissions.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01141.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Torrefaction technology for solid fuel production</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01141.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Torrefaction technology for solid fuel production</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Agar</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Margareta Wihersaari</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-22T03:01:00.641601-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01141.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01141.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01141.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded><description/></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01138.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Reed canary grass cultivation mitigates greenhouse gas emissions from abandoned peat extraction areas</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01138.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reed canary grass cultivation mitigates greenhouse gas emissions from abandoned peat extraction areas</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ülo Mander</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Järvi Järveoja</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Maddison</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kaido Soosaar</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rene Aavola</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ivika Ostonen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jüri-Ott Salm</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-22T03:00:44.764884-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01138.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01138.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01138.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We studied the impact of reed canary grass (RCG) cultivation on greenhouse gas emission in the following sites of an abandoned peat extraction area in Estonia: a bare soil (BS) site, a nonfertilized <em>Phalaris</em> (nfP) plot, a fertilized <em>Phalaris</em> (fP) plot, and a natural bog (NB) and a fen meadow (FM) as reference areas. The C balance and global warming potential (GWP) were estimated by measuring <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub>, <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub>, and <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions and aboveground and belowground biomass variations. The high <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> flux from the nfP and fP sites and the low <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emission from the BS are due to the enhancement of mineralization by plant growth on planted sites and inhibited mineralization by the recalcitrant C of BS. The NB site emitted 24 kg <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub> ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the almost zero <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub> emission from the <em>Phalaris</em> plots and the BS site was due to the high S concentration in peat, which probably inhibited methanogenesis. The <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> flux varied from &lt;0.1 kg on the <em>Phalaris</em> plots and the NB to 2.64 kg <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> on the FM. The highest yield of RCG was obtained in autumn (13.9 t and 8.0 t dw ha<sup>−1</sup> on the fP and nfP, respectively). By spring, the biomass yield on the fP and nfP plot was 12.7 and 7.9 t dw ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The C balance of nfP and fP plots was negative in comparison to the BS (−3322, −5983, and 2504 kg <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). This indicates that the cultivation of RCG transformed them from a net source of C into a net sink of C. The GWP for the fP and nfP sites was −5981 and −3885 kg <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> eq ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The BS site had a total GWP of 2544 kg <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> eq ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We studied the impact of reed canary grass (RCG) cultivation on greenhouse gas emission in the following sites of an abandoned peat extraction area in Estonia: a bare soil (BS) site, a nonfertilized Phalaris (nfP) plot, a fertilized Phalaris (fP) plot, and a natural bog (NB) and a fen meadow (FM) as reference areas. The C balance and global warming potential (GWP) were estimated by measuring CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions and aboveground and belowground biomass variations. The high CO2 flux from the nfP and fP sites and the low CO2 emission from the BS are due to the enhancement of mineralization by plant growth on planted sites and inhibited mineralization by the recalcitrant C of BS. The NB site emitted 24 kg CH4 ha−1 yr−1, whereas the almost zero CH4 emission from the Phalaris plots and the BS site was due to the high S concentration in peat, which probably inhibited methanogenesis. The N2O flux varied from &lt;0.1 kg on the Phalaris plots and the NB to 2.64 kg N2O ha−1 yr−1 on the FM. The highest yield of RCG was obtained in autumn (13.9 t and 8.0 t dw ha−1 on the fP and nfP, respectively). By spring, the biomass yield on the fP and nfP plot was 12.7 and 7.9 t dw ha−1, respectively. The C balance of nfP and fP plots was negative in comparison to the BS (−3322, −5983, and 2504 kg CO2 ha−1 yr−1, respectively). This indicates that the cultivation of RCG transformed them from a net source of C into a net sink of C. The GWP for the fP and nfP sites was −5981 and −3885 kg CO2 eq ha−1 yr−1, respectively. The BS site had a total GWP of 2544 kg CO2 eq ha−1 yr−1.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01140.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Simulating switchgrass biomass production across ecoregions using the DAYCENT model</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01140.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simulating switchgrass biomass production across ecoregions using the DAYCENT model</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juhwan Lee</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriel Pedroso</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce A. Linquist</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Putnam</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Kessel</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johan Six</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-18T03:25:19.073041-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01140.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01140.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01140.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The production potential of switchgrass (<em>Panicum virgatum</em> L.) has not been estimated in a Mediterranean climate on a regional basis and its economic and environmental contribution as a biofuel crop remains unknown. The objectives of the study were to calibrate and validate a biogeochemical model, DAYCENT, and to predict the biomass yield potential of switchgrass across the Central Valley of California. Six common cultivars were calibrated using published data across the US and validated with data generated from four field trials in California (2007–2009). After calibration, the modeled range of yields across the cultivars and various management practices in the US (excluding California) was 2.4–41.2 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, generally compatible with the observed yield range of 1.3–33.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Overall, the model was successfully validated in California; the model explained 66–90% of observed yield variation in 2007–2009. The range of modeled yields was 2.0–41.4 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, which corresponded to the observed range of 1.3–41.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. The response to N fertilizer and harvest frequency on yields were also reasonably validated. The model estimated that Alamo (21–23 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and Kanlow (22–24 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) had greatest yield potential during the years after establishment. The effects of soil texture on modeled yields tended to be consistent for all cultivars, but there were distinct climatic (e.g., annual mean maximum temperature) controls among the cultivars. Our modeled results suggest that early stand maintenance of irrigated switchgrass is strongly dependent on available soil N; estimated yields increased by 1.6–5.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> when residual soil mineral N was sufficient for optimal re-growth. Therefore, management options of switchgrass for regional biomass production should be ecotype-specific and ensure available soil N maintenance.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The production potential of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has not been estimated in a Mediterranean climate on a regional basis and its economic and environmental contribution as a biofuel crop remains unknown. The objectives of the study were to calibrate and validate a biogeochemical model, DAYCENT, and to predict the biomass yield potential of switchgrass across the Central Valley of California. Six common cultivars were calibrated using published data across the US and validated with data generated from four field trials in California (2007–2009). After calibration, the modeled range of yields across the cultivars and various management practices in the US (excluding California) was 2.4–41.2 Mg ha−1 yr−1, generally compatible with the observed yield range of 1.3–33.7 Mg ha−1 yr−1. Overall, the model was successfully validated in California; the model explained 66–90% of observed yield variation in 2007–2009. The range of modeled yields was 2.0–41.4 Mg ha−1 yr−1, which corresponded to the observed range of 1.3–41.1 Mg ha−1 yr−1. The response to N fertilizer and harvest frequency on yields were also reasonably validated. The model estimated that Alamo (21–23 Mg ha−1 yr−1) and Kanlow (22–24 Mg ha−1 yr−1) had greatest yield potential during the years after establishment. The effects of soil texture on modeled yields tended to be consistent for all cultivars, but there were distinct climatic (e.g., annual mean maximum temperature) controls among the cultivars. Our modeled results suggest that early stand maintenance of irrigated switchgrass is strongly dependent on available soil N; estimated yields increased by 1.6–5.5 Mg ha−1 yr−1 when residual soil mineral N was sufficient for optimal re-growth. Therefore, management options of switchgrass for regional biomass production should be ecotype-specific and ensure available soil N maintenance.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01130.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Modeling wildlife and other trade-offs with biofuel crop production</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01130.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Modeling wildlife and other trade-offs with biofuel crop production</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David M. Stoms</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank W. Davis</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark W. Jenner</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Theresa M. Nogeire</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen R. Kaffka</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-11-01T23:05:18.204139-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01130.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01130.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01130.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Biofuels from agricultural sources are an important part of California's strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on foreign oil. Land conversion for agricultural and urban uses has already imperiled many animal species in the state. This study investigated the potential impacts on wildlife of shifts in agricultural activity to increase biomass production for transportation fuels. We applied knowledge of the suitability of California's agricultural landscapes for wildlife species to evaluate wildlife effects associated with plausible scenarios of expanded production of three potential biofuel crops (sugar beets, bermudagrass, and canola). We also generated alternative, spatially explicit scenarios that minimized loss of habitat for the same level of biofuel production. We explored trade-offs to compare the marginal changes per unit of energy for transportation costs, wildlife, land and water-use, and total energy produced, and found that all five factors were influenced by crop choice. Sugar beet scenarios require the least land area: 3.5 times less land per liter of gasoline equivalent than bermudagrass and five times less than canola. Canola scenarios had the largest impacts on wildlife but the greatest reduction in water use. Bermudagrass scenarios resulted in a slight overall improvement for wildlife over the current situation. Relatively minor redistribution of lands converted to biofuel crops could produce the same energy yield with much less impact on wildlife and very small increases in transportation costs. This framework provides a means to systematically evaluate potential wildlife impacts of alternative production scenarios and could be a useful complement to other frameworks that assess impacts on ecosystem services and greenhouse gas emissions.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Biofuels from agricultural sources are an important part of California's strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on foreign oil. Land conversion for agricultural and urban uses has already imperiled many animal species in the state. This study investigated the potential impacts on wildlife of shifts in agricultural activity to increase biomass production for transportation fuels. We applied knowledge of the suitability of California's agricultural landscapes for wildlife species to evaluate wildlife effects associated with plausible scenarios of expanded production of three potential biofuel crops (sugar beets, bermudagrass, and canola). We also generated alternative, spatially explicit scenarios that minimized loss of habitat for the same level of biofuel production. We explored trade-offs to compare the marginal changes per unit of energy for transportation costs, wildlife, land and water-use, and total energy produced, and found that all five factors were influenced by crop choice. Sugar beet scenarios require the least land area: 3.5 times less land per liter of gasoline equivalent than bermudagrass and five times less than canola. Canola scenarios had the largest impacts on wildlife but the greatest reduction in water use. Bermudagrass scenarios resulted in a slight overall improvement for wildlife over the current situation. Relatively minor redistribution of lands converted to biofuel crops could produce the same energy yield with much less impact on wildlife and very small increases in transportation costs. This framework provides a means to systematically evaluate potential wildlife impacts of alternative production scenarios and could be a useful complement to other frameworks that assess impacts on ecosystem services and greenhouse gas emissions.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01136.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>How do soil emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from perennial bioenergy crops differ from arable annual crops?</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01136.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">How do soil emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from perennial bioenergy crops differ from arable annual crops?</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julia Drewer</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon W. Finch</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin R. Lloyd</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth M. Baggs</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ute Skiba</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-27T06:51:18.800288-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01136.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01136.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01136.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>It is important to demonstrate that replacing fossil fuel with bioenergy crops can reduce the national greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint. We compared field emissions of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and soil respiration rates from the C<sub>4</sub> grass <em>Miscanthus × giganteus</em> and willow (<em>salix)</em> with emissions from annual arable crops grown for food production. The study was carried out in NE England on adjacent fields of willow<em>, Miscanthus</em>, wheat (<em>Triticum aetivum</em>) and oilseed rape (<em>Brassica napus</em>). N<sub>2</sub>O, CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes and soil respiration rates were measured monthly using static chambers from June 2008 to November 2010. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) was measured by eddy covariance on <em>Miscanthus</em> from May 2008 and on willow from October 2009 until November 2010. The N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were significantly smaller from the bioenergy crops than that of the annual crops. Average fluxes were 8 and 32 μg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O-N from wheat and oilseed rape, and 4 and 0.2 μg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> N<sub>2</sub>O-N from <em>Miscanthus</em> and willow, respectively. Soil CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were negligible for all crops and soil respiration rates were similar for all crops. NEE of CO<sub>2</sub> was larger for <em>Miscanthus</em> (−770 g C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) than willow (−602 g C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) in the growing season of 2010. N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from <em>Miscanthus</em> and willow were lower than for the wheat and oilseed rape which is most likely a result of regular fertilizer application and tillage in the annual arable cropping systems. Application of <sup>15</sup>N-labelled fertilizer to <em>Miscanthus</em> and oil seed rape resulted in a fertilizer-induced increase in N<sub>2</sub>O emission in both crops. Denitrification rates (N<sub>2</sub>O + N<sub>2</sub>) were similar for soil under <em>Miscanthus</em> and oilseed rape. Thus, perennial bioenergy crops only emit less GHGs than annual crops when they receive no or very low rates of N fertilizer.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>It is important to demonstrate that replacing fossil fuel with bioenergy crops can reduce the national greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint. We compared field emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4) and soil respiration rates from the C4 grass Miscanthus × giganteus and willow (salix) with emissions from annual arable crops grown for food production. The study was carried out in NE England on adjacent fields of willow, Miscanthus, wheat (Triticum aetivum) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus). N2O, CH4 fluxes and soil respiration rates were measured monthly using static chambers from June 2008 to November 2010. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO2) was measured by eddy covariance on Miscanthus from May 2008 and on willow from October 2009 until November 2010. The N2O fluxes were significantly smaller from the bioenergy crops than that of the annual crops. Average fluxes were 8 and 32 μg m−2 h−1 N2O-N from wheat and oilseed rape, and 4 and 0.2 μg m−2 h−1 N2O-N from Miscanthus and willow, respectively. Soil CH4 fluxes were negligible for all crops and soil respiration rates were similar for all crops. NEE of CO2 was larger for Miscanthus (−770 g C m−2 h−1) than willow (−602 g C m−2 h−1) in the growing season of 2010. N2O emissions from Miscanthus and willow were lower than for the wheat and oilseed rape which is most likely a result of regular fertilizer application and tillage in the annual arable cropping systems. Application of 15N-labelled fertilizer to Miscanthus and oil seed rape resulted in a fertilizer-induced increase in N2O emission in both crops. Denitrification rates (N2O + N2) were similar for soil under Miscanthus and oilseed rape. Thus, perennial bioenergy crops only emit less GHGs than annual crops when they receive no or very low rates of N fertilizer.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01135.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Soil-derived trace gas fluxes from different energy crops – results from a field experiment in Southwest Germany</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01135.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soil-derived trace gas fluxes from different energy crops – results from a field experiment in Southwest Germany</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Gauder</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Klaus Butterbach-Bahl</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simone Graeff-Hönninger</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wilhelm Claupein</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Regina Wiegel</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-27T06:50:50.092511-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01135.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01135.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01135.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Willow coppice, energy maize and Miscanthus were evaluated regarding their soil-derived trace gas emission potential involving a nonfertilized and a crop-adapted slow-release nitrogen (N) fertilizer scheme. The N application rate was 80 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for the perennial crops and 240 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for the annual maize. A replicated field experiment was conducted with 1-year measurements of soil fluxes of <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub>, <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> and <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> in weekly intervals using static chambers. The measurements revealed a clear seasonal trend in soil <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions, with highest emissions being found for the N-fertilized Miscanthus plots (annual mean: 50 mg C m<sup>−</sup>² h<sup>−1</sup>). Significant differences between the cropping systems were found in soil <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions due to their dependency on amount and timing of N fertilization. N-fertilized maize plots had highest <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions by far, which accumulated to 3.6 kg <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. The contribution of <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub> fluxes to the total soil greenhouse gas subsumption was very small compared with <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> and <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub>. <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub> fluxes were mostly negative indicating that the investigated soils mainly acted as weak sinks for atmospheric <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub>. To identify the system providing the best ratio of yield to soil <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions, a subsumption relative to biomass yields was calculated. N-fertilized maize caused the highest soil <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions relative to dry matter yields. Moreover, unfertilized maize had higher relative soil <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions than unfertilized Miscanthus and willow. These results favour perennial crops for bioenergy production, as they are able to provide high yields with low <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> emissions in the field.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Willow coppice, energy maize and Miscanthus were evaluated regarding their soil-derived trace gas emission potential involving a nonfertilized and a crop-adapted slow-release nitrogen (N) fertilizer scheme. The N application rate was 80 kg N ha−1 yr−1 for the perennial crops and 240 kg N ha−1 yr−1 for the annual maize. A replicated field experiment was conducted with 1-year measurements of soil fluxes of CH4, CO2 and N2O in weekly intervals using static chambers. The measurements revealed a clear seasonal trend in soil CO2 emissions, with highest emissions being found for the N-fertilized Miscanthus plots (annual mean: 50 mg C m−² h−1). Significant differences between the cropping systems were found in soil N2O emissions due to their dependency on amount and timing of N fertilization. N-fertilized maize plots had highest N2O emissions by far, which accumulated to 3.6 kg N2O ha−1 yr−1. The contribution of CH4 fluxes to the total soil greenhouse gas subsumption was very small compared with N2O and CO2. CH4 fluxes were mostly negative indicating that the investigated soils mainly acted as weak sinks for atmospheric CH4. To identify the system providing the best ratio of yield to soil N2O emissions, a subsumption relative to biomass yields was calculated. N-fertilized maize caused the highest soil N2O emissions relative to dry matter yields. Moreover, unfertilized maize had higher relative soil N2O emissions than unfertilized Miscanthus and willow. These results favour perennial crops for bioenergy production, as they are able to provide high yields with low N2O emissions in the field.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01137.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Zero, one, or in between: evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01137.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zero, one, or in between: evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Neil Bird</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Naomi Pena</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dorian Frieden</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Giuliana Zanchi</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-27T06:46:17.456191-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01137.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01137.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01137.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Accounting for bioenergy's carbon dioxide (<span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub>) emissions, as done under the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme, fails to capture the full extent of these emissions. As a consequence, other approaches have been suggested. Both the EU and United States already use value-chain approaches to determine emissions due to biofuels – an approach quite different from that of the KP. Further, both the EU and United States are engaged in consultation processes to determine how emissions connected with use of biomass for heat and power will be handled under regulatory systems. The United States is considering whether <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions from biomass should be handled like fossil fuels. In this context, this article reviews and evaluates the three basic bioenergy accounting options.
</p><ol id="gcbb1137-list-0001" class="numbered"><li><span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions from bioenergy <span class="underlined ">are not</span> counted at the point of combustion. Instead emissions due to use of biomass are accounted for in the land-use sector as carbon stock losses – a combustion factor (CoF) = 0 approach;</li><li><span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions from bioenergy <span class="underlined ">are</span> accounted for in the energy sector – a CoF = 1 approach; and</li><li>End users account for all or a specified subset of <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions, regardless of where geographically these emissions occur – 0 &lt; CoF &lt; 1.</li></ol></div><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Following short descriptions of the basic options, this article discusses variations to these options and uses numerical examples to illustrate the impacts of approaches at a local and international level. Finally, the alternative accounting systems are evaluated against general criteria and for impacts on selected stakeholder goals. General criteria considered are: (a) comprehensiveness, (b) simplicity, and (c) scale independence. Stakeholder goals reviewed are: (a) stimulation of rural economies, (b) food security, (c) GHG reductions, and (d) preservation of forests.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Accounting for bioenergy's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, as done under the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme, fails to capture the full extent of these emissions. As a consequence, other approaches have been suggested. Both the EU and United States already use value-chain approaches to determine emissions due to biofuels – an approach quite different from that of the KP. Further, both the EU and United States are engaged in consultation processes to determine how emissions connected with use of biomass for heat and power will be handled under regulatory systems. The United States is considering whether CO2 emissions from biomass should be handled like fossil fuels. In this context, this article reviews and evaluates the three basic bioenergy accounting options.
CO2 emissions from bioenergy are not counted at the point of combustion. Instead emissions due to use of biomass are accounted for in the land-use sector as carbon stock losses – a combustion factor (CoF) = 0 approach;CO2 emissions from bioenergy are accounted for in the energy sector – a CoF = 1 approach; andEnd users account for all or a specified subset of CO2 emissions, regardless of where geographically these emissions occur – 0 &lt; CoF &lt; 1.Following short descriptions of the basic options, this article discusses variations to these options and uses numerical examples to illustrate the impacts of approaches at a local and international level. Finally, the alternative accounting systems are evaluated against general criteria and for impacts on selected stakeholder goals. General criteria considered are: (a) comprehensiveness, (b) simplicity, and (c) scale independence. Stakeholder goals reviewed are: (a) stimulation of rural economies, (b) food security, (c) GHG reductions, and (d) preservation of forests.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01133.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A landscape-based approach for assessing spatiotemporal impacts of forest biomass-based electricity generation on the age structure of surrounding forest plantations in the Southern United States</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01133.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A landscape-based approach for assessing spatiotemporal impacts of forest biomass-based electricity generation on the age structure of surrounding forest plantations in the Southern United States</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Puneet Dwivedi</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Bailis</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas R. Carter</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ajay Sharma</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-24T08:50:28.27465-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01133.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01133.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01133.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Forest plantations support several ecosystem services including biodiversity conservation. Establishment of a forest biomass-based industry could significantly change the age structure of forest plantations located in its vicinity and thus, could lead to a possible loss of biodiversity. Therefore, this study assesses spatiotemporal impacts of a forest biomass-based power plant on the age structure of surrounding forest plantations at landscape level. A cellular automata approach was adopted and interactions between economic objectives of forest landowners and a power plant owner punctuated by forest growth and management characteristics were considered. These spatiotemporal impacts were jointly assessed for four separate scenarios and four different power plant capacities using appropriate landscape-level indices. Slash pine (<em>P</em><em>inus elliotti</em>L.) was selected as a representative species. Results indicate that the age structure of surrounding forest plantations continuously fluctuates with respect to each year of power plant operation. However, the age structure, once disturbed, never becomes comparable to the original age structure. We also found that the mature plantations were harvested during early years of power plant operation and were never observed again for the remaining years of power plant operation. This was particularly true for high capacity power plants. Similarly, high value of selected spatial index at the end of power plant life for a high capacity power plant relative to the original low value of the same index indicates aggregation of remaining plantation ages at landscape level. Establishment of low capacity forest biomass-based power plants and adoption of an integrated regional level planning approach could help in maintaining original age structure characteristics of surrounding forest plantations to a large extent. This might help in sustaining various ecosystem services including biodiversity conservation obtained from forest plantations in a long run.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Forest plantations support several ecosystem services including biodiversity conservation. Establishment of a forest biomass-based industry could significantly change the age structure of forest plantations located in its vicinity and thus, could lead to a possible loss of biodiversity. Therefore, this study assesses spatiotemporal impacts of a forest biomass-based power plant on the age structure of surrounding forest plantations at landscape level. A cellular automata approach was adopted and interactions between economic objectives of forest landowners and a power plant owner punctuated by forest growth and management characteristics were considered. These spatiotemporal impacts were jointly assessed for four separate scenarios and four different power plant capacities using appropriate landscape-level indices. Slash pine (Pinus elliottiL.) was selected as a representative species. Results indicate that the age structure of surrounding forest plantations continuously fluctuates with respect to each year of power plant operation. However, the age structure, once disturbed, never becomes comparable to the original age structure. We also found that the mature plantations were harvested during early years of power plant operation and were never observed again for the remaining years of power plant operation. This was particularly true for high capacity power plants. Similarly, high value of selected spatial index at the end of power plant life for a high capacity power plant relative to the original low value of the same index indicates aggregation of remaining plantation ages at landscape level. Establishment of low capacity forest biomass-based power plants and adoption of an integrated regional level planning approach could help in maintaining original age structure characteristics of surrounding forest plantations to a large extent. This might help in sustaining various ecosystem services including biodiversity conservation obtained from forest plantations in a long run.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01131.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A geography-based critique of new US biofuels regulations</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01131.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A geography-based critique of new US biofuels regulations</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stewart Fast</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Brklacich</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Saner</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-17T00:44:00.397962-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01131.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01131.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01131.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Opinion</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The new renewable fuels standard (RFS 2) aims to distinguish corn-ethanol that achieves a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared with gasoline. Field data from Kim <em>et al</em>. (2009) and from our own study suggest that geographic variability in the GHG emissions arising from corn production casts considerable doubt on the approach used in the RFS 2 to measure compliance with the 20% target. If regulators wish to require compliance of fuels with specific GHG emission reduction thresholds, then data from growing biomass should be disaggregated to a level that captures the level of variability in grain corn production and the application of life cycle assessment to biofuels should be modified to capture this variability.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The new renewable fuels standard (RFS 2) aims to distinguish corn-ethanol that achieves a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared with gasoline. Field data from Kim et al. (2009) and from our own study suggest that geographic variability in the GHG emissions arising from corn production casts considerable doubt on the approach used in the RFS 2 to measure compliance with the 20% target. If regulators wish to require compliance of fuels with specific GHG emission reduction thresholds, then data from growing biomass should be disaggregated to a level that captures the level of variability in grain corn production and the application of life cycle assessment to biofuels should be modified to capture this variability.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01129.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Impacts of land use change due to biofuel crops on carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, in the conterminous United States</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01129.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Impacts of land use change due to biofuel crops on carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, in the conterminous United States</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhangcai Qin</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Qianlai Zhuang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Min Chen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-09T21:51:37.653513-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01129.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01129.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01129.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Growing concerns about energy and the environment have led to worldwide use of bioenergy. Switching from food crops to biofuel crops is an option to meet the fast-growing need for biofuel feedstocks. This land use change consequently affects the ecosystem carbon balance. In this study, we used a biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model, to evaluate the impacts of this change on the carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, assuming that several land use change scenarios from corn, soybean, and wheat to biofuel crops of switchgrass and <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> will occur. We found that biofuel crops have much higher net primary production (NPP) than soybean and wheat crops. When food crops from current agricultural lands were changed to different biofuel crops, the national total NPP increased in all cases by a range of 0.14–0.88 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>, except while switching from corn to switchgrass when a decrease of 14% was observed. <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> is more productive than switchgrass, producing about 2.5 times the NPP of switchgrass. The net carbon loss ranges from 1.0 to 6.3 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup> if food crops are changed to switchgrass, and from 0.4 to 6.7 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup> if changed to <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em>. The largest loss was observed when soybean crops were replaced with biofuel crops. Soil organic carbon increased significantly when land use changed, reaching 100 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> in biofuel crop ecosystems. When switching from food crops to <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em>, the per unit area croplands produced a larger amount of ethanol than that of original food crops. In comparison, the land use change from wheat to <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> produced more biomass and sequestrated more carbon. Our study suggests that <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> could better serve as an energy crop than food crops or switchgrass, considering both economic and environmental benefits.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Growing concerns about energy and the environment have led to worldwide use of bioenergy. Switching from food crops to biofuel crops is an option to meet the fast-growing need for biofuel feedstocks. This land use change consequently affects the ecosystem carbon balance. In this study, we used a biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model, to evaluate the impacts of this change on the carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, assuming that several land use change scenarios from corn, soybean, and wheat to biofuel crops of switchgrass and Miscanthus will occur. We found that biofuel crops have much higher net primary production (NPP) than soybean and wheat crops. When food crops from current agricultural lands were changed to different biofuel crops, the national total NPP increased in all cases by a range of 0.14–0.88 Pg C yr−1, except while switching from corn to switchgrass when a decrease of 14% was observed. Miscanthus is more productive than switchgrass, producing about 2.5 times the NPP of switchgrass. The net carbon loss ranges from 1.0 to 6.3 Tg C yr−1 if food crops are changed to switchgrass, and from 0.4 to 6.7 Tg C yr−1 if changed to Miscanthus. The largest loss was observed when soybean crops were replaced with biofuel crops. Soil organic carbon increased significantly when land use changed, reaching 100 Mg C ha−1 in biofuel crop ecosystems. When switching from food crops to Miscanthus, the per unit area croplands produced a larger amount of ethanol than that of original food crops. In comparison, the land use change from wheat to Miscanthus produced more biomass and sequestrated more carbon. Our study suggests that Miscanthus could better serve as an energy crop than food crops or switchgrass, considering both economic and environmental benefits.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01128.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Mycorrhizal-mediated nitrogen acquisition in switchgrass under elevated temperatures and N enrichment</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01128.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mycorrhizal-mediated nitrogen acquisition in switchgrass under elevated temperatures and N enrichment</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle S. Schroeder-Moreno</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tara L. Greaver</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shuxin Wang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shujin Hu</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas W. Rufty</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-10-06T01:24:21.061952-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01128.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01128.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01128.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can perform key roles in ecosystem functioning through improving host nutrient acquisition. Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for plant growth, however, anthropogenic N loading (e.g. crop fertilization and deposition from combustion sources) is increasing so that N now threatens ecosystem sustainability around the world by causing terrestrial and aquatic eutrophication and acidification. It is important to better understand the capacity of AMF to directly uptake N from soils and transfer it to host plants because this process may increase N recycling and retention within ecosystems. In addition to understanding the role of AMF in the N cycle in the present day it is important to understand how AMF function may change as global change proceeds. Currently the net effects of N enrichment and elevated temperature predicted with global change on AMF are unknown. In this study, we examined the effects of N enrichment by simulated N-deposition loading, elevated temperatures expected by future global changes and their interactions on growth and AMF-mediated N acquisition of switchgrass (<em>P</em><em>anicum virgatum</em> var. Alamo), an important species for biofuel production. Switchgrass plants were grown in microcosm units that divided mycorrhizal roots from AMF hyphae and organic residues enriched with <sup>15</sup>N by compartments separated by an air gap to reduce N diffusion. While AMF did not enhance switchgrass biomass, mycorrhizas significantly increased <sup>15</sup>N in shoots and total shoot N. Neither N enrichment nor elevated temperatures influenced this mycorrhizal-mediated N uptake and transfer. Results from this study can aid in developing sustainable bioethanol and switchgrass production practices that are less reliant on synthetic fertilizers and more dependent on internal N recycling from AMF.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can perform key roles in ecosystem functioning through improving host nutrient acquisition. Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for plant growth, however, anthropogenic N loading (e.g. crop fertilization and deposition from combustion sources) is increasing so that N now threatens ecosystem sustainability around the world by causing terrestrial and aquatic eutrophication and acidification. It is important to better understand the capacity of AMF to directly uptake N from soils and transfer it to host plants because this process may increase N recycling and retention within ecosystems. In addition to understanding the role of AMF in the N cycle in the present day it is important to understand how AMF function may change as global change proceeds. Currently the net effects of N enrichment and elevated temperature predicted with global change on AMF are unknown. In this study, we examined the effects of N enrichment by simulated N-deposition loading, elevated temperatures expected by future global changes and their interactions on growth and AMF-mediated N acquisition of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum var. Alamo), an important species for biofuel production. Switchgrass plants were grown in microcosm units that divided mycorrhizal roots from AMF hyphae and organic residues enriched with 15N by compartments separated by an air gap to reduce N diffusion. While AMF did not enhance switchgrass biomass, mycorrhizas significantly increased 15N in shoots and total shoot N. Neither N enrichment nor elevated temperatures influenced this mycorrhizal-mediated N uptake and transfer. Results from this study can aid in developing sustainable bioethanol and switchgrass production practices that are less reliant on synthetic fertilizers and more dependent on internal N recycling from AMF.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01127.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Biogenic vs. geologic carbon emissions and forest biomass energy production</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01127.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Biogenic vs. geologic carbon emissions and forest biomass energy production</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John S. Gunn</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David J. Ganz</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William S. Keeton</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-20T23:06:21.939136-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01127.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01127.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01127.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Opinion</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the current debate over the <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions implications of switching from fossil fuel energy sources to include a substantial amount of woody biomass energy, many scientists and policy makers hold the view that emissions from the two sources should not be equated. Their rationale is that the combustion or decay of woody biomass is simply part of the global cycle of biogenic carbon and does not increase the amount of carbon in circulation. This view is frequently presented as justification to implement policies that encourage the substitution of fossil fuel energy sources with biomass. We present the opinion that this is an inappropriate conceptual basis to assess the atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting of woody biomass energy generation. While there are many other environmental, social, and economic reasons to move to woody biomass energy, we argue that the inferred benefits of biogenic emissions over fossil fuel emissions should be reconsidered.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>In the current debate over the CO2 emissions implications of switching from fossil fuel energy sources to include a substantial amount of woody biomass energy, many scientists and policy makers hold the view that emissions from the two sources should not be equated. Their rationale is that the combustion or decay of woody biomass is simply part of the global cycle of biogenic carbon and does not increase the amount of carbon in circulation. This view is frequently presented as justification to implement policies that encourage the substitution of fossil fuel energy sources with biomass. We present the opinion that this is an inappropriate conceptual basis to assess the atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting of woody biomass energy generation. While there are many other environmental, social, and economic reasons to move to woody biomass energy, we argue that the inferred benefits of biogenic emissions over fossil fuel emissions should be reconsidered.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01126.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Juice, sugar, and bagasse response of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench cv. M81E) to N fertilization and soil type</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01126.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Juice, sugar, and bagasse response of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench cv. M81E) to N fertilization and soil type</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roland A. Y. Holou</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gene Stevens</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-19T00:29:24.913103-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01126.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01126.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01126.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The objective of this research was to determine the optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate for producing sweet sorghum (a promising biofuel crop) juice, sugar, and bagasse on silt loam, sandy loam, and clay soils in Missouri. Seven nitrogen fertilization rates were applied, ranging from 0 to 134 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. Regardless of the soil and year, the juice content of sweet sorghum stalk averaged 68.8% by weight. The juice yield ranged from 15.2 to 71.1 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>. Soil and N rate significantly impacted the juice yield (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). The pH and the density of the juice were not affected by the soil or N. The sugar content (Brix) of the juice varied between 10.7% and 18.9%. N fertilization improved the sugar content of the juice. A negative correlation existed between the sugar concentration and the juice yield. In general, the lowest sugar content was found in the clay soil and the impact of the N fertilization on juice sugar content was most pronounced in that soil. The juice sugar yield ranged between 2 and 9.9 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with significant differences found between years, N rates, and soils. N fertilization always increased the sugar yield in the clay soil, whereas in loam soil, a significant sugar response was recorded when the sweet sorghum was planted after corn. The average juice water content was 84% by weight. The dry bagasse yield fluctuated between 3.2 and 13.8 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> with significant difference found with N rate, soil, and year. When sweet sorghum was grown after soybean or cotton, its N requirement was less than after a corn crop was grown the previous year. In general, a minimum of 67 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> was required to optimize juice, sugar, and bagasse yield in sweet sorghum.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The objective of this research was to determine the optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate for producing sweet sorghum (a promising biofuel crop) juice, sugar, and bagasse on silt loam, sandy loam, and clay soils in Missouri. Seven nitrogen fertilization rates were applied, ranging from 0 to 134 kg N ha−1. Regardless of the soil and year, the juice content of sweet sorghum stalk averaged 68.8% by weight. The juice yield ranged from 15.2 to 71.1 m3 ha−1. Soil and N rate significantly impacted the juice yield (P &lt; 0.0001). The pH and the density of the juice were not affected by the soil or N. The sugar content (Brix) of the juice varied between 10.7% and 18.9%. N fertilization improved the sugar content of the juice. A negative correlation existed between the sugar concentration and the juice yield. In general, the lowest sugar content was found in the clay soil and the impact of the N fertilization on juice sugar content was most pronounced in that soil. The juice sugar yield ranged between 2 and 9.9 Mg ha−1, with significant differences found between years, N rates, and soils. N fertilization always increased the sugar yield in the clay soil, whereas in loam soil, a significant sugar response was recorded when the sweet sorghum was planted after corn. The average juice water content was 84% by weight. The dry bagasse yield fluctuated between 3.2 and 13.8 Mg ha−1 with significant difference found with N rate, soil, and year. When sweet sorghum was grown after soybean or cotton, its N requirement was less than after a corn crop was grown the previous year. In general, a minimum of 67 kg N ha−1 was required to optimize juice, sugar, and bagasse yield in sweet sorghum.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01125.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Economic and greenhouse gas costs of Miscanthus supply chains in the United Kingdom</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01125.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Economic and greenhouse gas costs of Miscanthus supply chains in the United Kingdom</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shifeng Wang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sicong Wang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Astley Hastings</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Pogson</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Smith</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-12T04:42:08.151302-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01125.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01125.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01125.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><em>Miscanthus</em> has been identified as one of the most promising perennial grasses for renewable energy generation in Europe and the United States [<em>Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change</em><b>9</b> (2004) 433]. However, the decision to use <em>Miscanthus</em> depends to a considerable degree on its economic and environmental performance [<em>Soil Use and Management</em><b>24</b> (2008) 235; <em>Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews</em><b>13</b> (2009) 1230]. This article assessed the spatial distribution of the economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) costs of producing and supplying <em>Miscanthus</em> in the UK. The average farm-gate production cost of <em>Miscanthus</em> in the UK is estimated to be 40 £ per oven-dried tonne (£ odt<sup>−1</sup>), and the average GHG emissions from the production of <em>Miscanthus</em> are 1.72 kg carbon equivalent per oven-dried tonnes per year (kg CE odt<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). The production cost of <em>Miscanthus</em> varies from 35 to 55 £ odt<sup>−1</sup> with the lowest production costs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and the highest costs in Scotland. Sensitivity analysis shows that yield of <em>Miscanthus</em> is the most influential factor in its production cost, with precipitation the most crucial input in determining yield. GHG emissions from the production of <em>Miscanthus</em> range from 1.24 to 2.11 kg CE odt<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. To maximize the GHG benefit, <em>Miscanthus</em> should be established preferentially on croplands, though other considerations obviously arise concerning suitability and value of the land for food production.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Miscanthus has been identified as one of the most promising perennial grasses for renewable energy generation in Europe and the United States [Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change9 (2004) 433]. However, the decision to use Miscanthus depends to a considerable degree on its economic and environmental performance [Soil Use and Management24 (2008) 235; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews13 (2009) 1230]. This article assessed the spatial distribution of the economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) costs of producing and supplying Miscanthus in the UK. The average farm-gate production cost of Miscanthus in the UK is estimated to be 40 £ per oven-dried tonne (£ odt−1), and the average GHG emissions from the production of Miscanthus are 1.72 kg carbon equivalent per oven-dried tonnes per year (kg CE odt−1 yr−1). The production cost of Miscanthus varies from 35 to 55 £ odt−1 with the lowest production costs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and the highest costs in Scotland. Sensitivity analysis shows that yield of Miscanthus is the most influential factor in its production cost, with precipitation the most crucial input in determining yield. GHG emissions from the production of Miscanthus range from 1.24 to 2.11 kg CE odt−1 yr−1. To maximize the GHG benefit, Miscanthus should be established preferentially on croplands, though other considerations obviously arise concerning suitability and value of the land for food production.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01117.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Soil carbon sequestration during the establishment phase of Miscanthus × giganteus: a regional-scale study on commercial farms using 13C natural abundance</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01117.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soil carbon sequestration during the establishment phase of Miscanthus × giganteus: a regional-scale study on commercial farms using 13C natural abundance</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesko Zimmermann</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jens Dauber</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael B. Jones</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-06T04:57:25.726891-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01117.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01117.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01117.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Article</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The use of biomass for energy production is considered a promising way to reduce net carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. However, land-use change to bioenergy crops can result in carbon emissions from soil and vegetation in amounts that could take decades to compensate. Perennial grasses such as <em>Miscanthus</em> offer a possible solution to this problem as measurements on experimental plots planted with <em>Miscanthus</em> have shown significant carbon sequestration in the soil. It can, however, be expected that sequestration potentials in commercial use might differ from those measured in experimental plots due to different farming practices and soil characteristics. For this study, <em>Miscanthus</em> plantations on 16 farms in SE Ireland as well as on-farm controls representing the former land-use (grassland and tillage) have been examined. The <em>Miscanthus</em> plantations were 2–3 years old. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content and a number of soil properties were measured and the amount of <em>Miscanthus</em>-derived carbon was determined using the <sup>13</sup>C natural abundance method. On both former tillage fields and grasslands, although there were no significant differences in SOC contents between <em>Miscanthus</em> and control sites, it was shown that 2–3 years after <em>Miscanthus</em> establishment, 1.82 ± 1.69 and 2.17 ± 1.73 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> of the SOC under former-tilled and former grassland respectively were <em>Miscanthus</em>-derived. Mixed-effects models were used to link the total SOC concentrations and <em>Miscanthus</em>-derived carbon to the land-use parameters as well as to soil properties. It was shown that on control sites, pH had an effect on total SOC. In the case of <em>Miscanthus</em>-derived carbon, the initial SOC content, pH, former land-use and crop age had significant effects.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The use of biomass for energy production is considered a promising way to reduce net carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. However, land-use change to bioenergy crops can result in carbon emissions from soil and vegetation in amounts that could take decades to compensate. Perennial grasses such as Miscanthus offer a possible solution to this problem as measurements on experimental plots planted with Miscanthus have shown significant carbon sequestration in the soil. It can, however, be expected that sequestration potentials in commercial use might differ from those measured in experimental plots due to different farming practices and soil characteristics. For this study, Miscanthus plantations on 16 farms in SE Ireland as well as on-farm controls representing the former land-use (grassland and tillage) have been examined. The Miscanthus plantations were 2–3 years old. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content and a number of soil properties were measured and the amount of Miscanthus-derived carbon was determined using the 13C natural abundance method. On both former tillage fields and grasslands, although there were no significant differences in SOC contents between Miscanthus and control sites, it was shown that 2–3 years after Miscanthus establishment, 1.82 ± 1.69 and 2.17 ± 1.73 Mg ha−1 of the SOC under former-tilled and former grassland respectively were Miscanthus-derived. Mixed-effects models were used to link the total SOC concentrations and Miscanthus-derived carbon to the land-use parameters as well as to soil properties. It was shown that on control sites, pH had an effect on total SOC. In the case of Miscanthus-derived carbon, the initial SOC content, pH, former land-use and crop age had significant effects.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01119.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Inoculation of hybrid poplar with the endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638 increases biomass but does not impact leaf level physiology</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01119.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Inoculation of hybrid poplar with the endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638 increases biomass but does not impact leaf level physiology</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alistair Rogers</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelly McDonald</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Megan F. Muehlbauer</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Hoffman</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kaitlyn Koenig</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Newman</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Safiyh Taghavi</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Lelie</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-04T21:36:39.548616-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01119.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01119.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01119.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Technical Advance</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Endophytic bacteria have been shown to provide several advantages to their host, including enhanced growth. Inoculating biofuel species with endophytic bacteria is therefore an attractive option to increase the productivity of biofuel feedstocks. Here, we investigated the effect of inoculating hard wood cuttings of <em>P</em><em>opulus deltoides</em> Bartr. <em>× </em><em>P</em><em>opulus. nigra</em> L. clone OP367 with <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638. After 17 weeks, plants inoculated with <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638 had 55% greater total biomass than un-inoculated control plants. Study of gas exchange and fluorescence in developing and mature leaves over a diurnal cycle and over a 5 week measurement campaign revealed no effects of inoculation on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic water use efficiency or the maximum and operating efficiency of photosystem II. However, plants inoculated with <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638 had a canopy that was 39% larger than control plants indicating that the enhanced growth was fueled by increased leaf area, not by improved physiology. Leaf nitrogen content was determined at two stages over the 5 week measurement period. No effect of <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638 on leaf nitrogen content was found indicating that the larger plants were acquiring sufficient nitrogen. <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638 lacks the genes for <span class="fixed-roman">N</span><sub>2</sub> fixation, therefore the increased availability of nitrogen likely resulted from enhanced nitrogen acquisition by the 84% larger root system. These data show that <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638 has the potential to dramatically increase productivity in poplar. If fully realized in the production environment, these results indicate that an increase in the environmental and economic viability of poplar as a biofuel feedstock is possible when inoculated with endophytic bacteria like <em>E</em><em>nterobacter</em> sp. 638.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Endophytic bacteria have been shown to provide several advantages to their host, including enhanced growth. Inoculating biofuel species with endophytic bacteria is therefore an attractive option to increase the productivity of biofuel feedstocks. Here, we investigated the effect of inoculating hard wood cuttings of Populus deltoides Bartr. × Populus. nigra L. clone OP367 with Enterobacter sp. 638. After 17 weeks, plants inoculated with Enterobacter sp. 638 had 55% greater total biomass than un-inoculated control plants. Study of gas exchange and fluorescence in developing and mature leaves over a diurnal cycle and over a 5 week measurement campaign revealed no effects of inoculation on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic water use efficiency or the maximum and operating efficiency of photosystem II. However, plants inoculated with Enterobacter sp. 638 had a canopy that was 39% larger than control plants indicating that the enhanced growth was fueled by increased leaf area, not by improved physiology. Leaf nitrogen content was determined at two stages over the 5 week measurement period. No effect of Enterobacter sp. 638 on leaf nitrogen content was found indicating that the larger plants were acquiring sufficient nitrogen. Enterobacter sp. 638 lacks the genes for N2 fixation, therefore the increased availability of nitrogen likely resulted from enhanced nitrogen acquisition by the 84% larger root system. These data show that Enterobacter sp. 638 has the potential to dramatically increase productivity in poplar. If fully realized in the production environment, these results indicate that an increase in the environmental and economic viability of poplar as a biofuel feedstock is possible when inoculated with endophytic bacteria like Enterobacter sp. 638.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01116.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01116.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Axel Don</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce Osborne</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Astley Hastings</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ute Skiba</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mette S. Carter</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julia Drewer</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heinz Flessa</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Annette Freibauer</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niina Hyvönen</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike B. Jones</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary J. Lanigan</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ülo Mander</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrea Monti</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sylvestre Njakou Djomo</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Valentine</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Katja Walter</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walter Zegada-Lizarazu</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terenzio Zenone</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011-09-04T21:36:33.802915-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01116.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">n/a</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Bioenergy from crops is expected to make a considerable contribution to climate change mitigation. However, bioenergy is not necessarily carbon neutral because emissions of <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub>, <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> and <span class="fixed-roman">CH</span><sub>4</sub> during crop production may reduce or completely counterbalance <span class="fixed-roman">CO</span><sub>2</sub> savings of the substituted fossil fuels. These greenhouse gases (GHGs) need to be included into the carbon footprint calculation of different bioenergy crops under a range of soil conditions and management practices. This review compiles existing knowledge on agronomic and environmental constraints and GHG balances of the major European bioenergy crops, although it focuses on dedicated perennial crops such as <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em> and short rotation coppice species. Such second-generation crops account for only 3% of the current European bioenergy production, but field data suggest they emit 40% to &gt;99% less <span class="fixed-roman">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> than conventional annual crops. This is a result of lower fertilizer requirements as well as a higher N-use efficiency, due to effective N-recycling. Perennial energy crops have the potential to sequester additional carbon in soil biomass if established on former cropland (0.44 Mg soil C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for poplar and willow and 0.66 Mg soil C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for <em>M</em><em>iscanthus</em>). However, there was no positive or even negative effects on the C balance if energy crops are established on former grassland. Increased bioenergy production may also result in direct and indirect land-use changes with potential high C losses when native vegetation is converted to annual crops. Although dedicated perennial energy crops have a high potential to improve the GHG balance of bioenergy production, several agronomic and economic constraints still have to be overcome.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Bioenergy from crops is expected to make a considerable contribution to climate change mitigation. However, bioenergy is not necessarily carbon neutral because emissions of CO2, N2O and CH4 during crop production may reduce or completely counterbalance CO2 savings of the substituted fossil fuels. These greenhouse gases (GHGs) need to be included into the carbon footprint calculation of different bioenergy crops under a range of soil conditions and management practices. This review compiles existing knowledge on agronomic and environmental constraints and GHG balances of the major European bioenergy crops, although it focuses on dedicated perennial crops such as Miscanthus and short rotation coppice species. Such second-generation crops account for only 3% of the current European bioenergy production, but field data suggest they emit 40% to &gt;99% less N2O than conventional annual crops. This is a result of lower fertilizer requirements as well as a higher N-use efficiency, due to effective N-recycling. Perennial energy crops have the potential to sequester additional carbon in soil biomass if established on former cropland (0.44 Mg soil C ha−1 yr−1 for poplar and willow and 0.66 Mg soil C ha−1 yr−1 for Miscanthus). However, there was no positive or even negative effects on the C balance if energy crops are established on former grassland. Increased bioenergy production may also result in direct and indirect land-use changes with potential high C losses when native vegetation is converted to annual crops. Although dedicated perennial energy crops have a high potential to improve the GHG balance of bioenergy production, several agronomic and economic constraints still have to be overcome.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01111.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01111.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Valentine</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Clifton-Brown</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Astley Hastings</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Robson</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gordon Allison</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Smith</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01111.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01111.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01111.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Review</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">19</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This review addresses the main issues concerning anticipated demands for the use of land for food and for bioenergy. It should be possible to meet increasing demands for food using existing and new technologies although this may not be easily or cheaply accomplished. The alleviation of hunger depends on food accessibility as well as food availability. Modern civilizations also require energy. This article presents the vision for bioenergy in terms of four major gains for society: a reduction in C emissions from the substitution of fossil fuels with appropriate energy crops; a significant contribution to energy security by reductions in fossil fuel dependence, for example, to meet government targets; new options that stimulate rural and urban economic development, and reduced dependence of global agriculture on fossil fuels. This vision is likely to be best fulfilled by the use of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops. We outline a number of factors that need to be taken into account in estimating the land area available for bioenergy. In terms of provisioning services, the value of biofuels is estimated at $54.7‒$330 bn per year at a crude oil price of $100 per barrel. In terms of regulatory services, the value of carbon emissions saved is estimated at $56‒$218 bn at a carbon price of $40 per tonne. Although global government subsidies for biofuels have been estimated at $20 bn (IEA, 2010b), these are dwarfed by subsidies for fossil fuel consumption ($312 bn; IEA, 2010b) and by total agricultural support for food and commodity crops ($383.7 bn in 2009; OECD, 2010).</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This review addresses the main issues concerning anticipated demands for the use of land for food and for bioenergy. It should be possible to meet increasing demands for food using existing and new technologies although this may not be easily or cheaply accomplished. The alleviation of hunger depends on food accessibility as well as food availability. Modern civilizations also require energy. This article presents the vision for bioenergy in terms of four major gains for society: a reduction in C emissions from the substitution of fossil fuels with appropriate energy crops; a significant contribution to energy security by reductions in fossil fuel dependence, for example, to meet government targets; new options that stimulate rural and urban economic development, and reduced dependence of global agriculture on fossil fuels. This vision is likely to be best fulfilled by the use of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops. We outline a number of factors that need to be taken into account in estimating the land area available for bioenergy. In terms of provisioning services, the value of biofuels is estimated at $54.7‒$330 bn per year at a crude oil price of $100 per barrel. In terms of regulatory services, the value of carbon emissions saved is estimated at $56‒$218 bn at a carbon price of $40 per tonne. Although global government subsidies for biofuels have been estimated at $20 bn (IEA, 2010b), these are dwarfed by subsidies for fossil fuel consumption ($312 bn; IEA, 2010b) and by total agricultural support for food and commodity crops ($383.7 bn in 2009; OECD, 2010).</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01103.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The production-ecological sustainability of cassava, sugarcane and sweet sorghum cultivation for bioethanol in Mozambique</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01103.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The production-ecological sustainability of cassava, sugarcane and sweet sorghum cultivation for bioethanol in Mozambique</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SANDER C. DE VRIES</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GERRIE W. J. VAN DE VEN</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MARTIN K. VAN ITTERSUM</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KEN E. GILLER</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01103.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01103.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01103.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">20</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">35</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We present an approach for providing quantitative insight into the production-ecological sustainability of biofuel feedstock production systems. The approach is based on a simple crop-soil model and was used for assessing feedstock from current and improved production systems of cassava for bioethanol. Assessments were performed for a study area in Mozambique, a country considered promising for biomass production. Our focus is on the potential role of smallholders in the production of feedstock for biofuels. We take cassava as the crop for this purpose and compare it with feedstock production on plantations using sugarcane, sweet sorghum and cassava as benchmarks. Production-ecological sustainability was defined by seven indicators related to resource-use efficiency, soil quality, net energy production and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Results indicate that of the assessed systems, sugarcane performed better than cassava, although it requires substantial water for irrigation. Targeted use of nutrient inputs improved sustainability of smallholder cassava. Cassava production systems on more fertile soils were more sustainable than those on less fertile soils; the latter required more external inputs for achieving the same output, affecting most indicators negatively and reducing the feasibility for smallholders. Cassava and sweet sorghum performed similarly. Cassava production requires much more labour per hectare than production of sugarcane or sweet sorghum. Production of bioethanol feedstock on cultivated lands was more sustainable and had potential for carbon sequestration, avoiding GHG emissions from clearing natural vegetation if new land is opened.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We present an approach for providing quantitative insight into the production-ecological sustainability of biofuel feedstock production systems. The approach is based on a simple crop-soil model and was used for assessing feedstock from current and improved production systems of cassava for bioethanol. Assessments were performed for a study area in Mozambique, a country considered promising for biomass production. Our focus is on the potential role of smallholders in the production of feedstock for biofuels. We take cassava as the crop for this purpose and compare it with feedstock production on plantations using sugarcane, sweet sorghum and cassava as benchmarks. Production-ecological sustainability was defined by seven indicators related to resource-use efficiency, soil quality, net energy production and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Results indicate that of the assessed systems, sugarcane performed better than cassava, although it requires substantial water for irrigation. Targeted use of nutrient inputs improved sustainability of smallholder cassava. Cassava production systems on more fertile soils were more sustainable than those on less fertile soils; the latter required more external inputs for achieving the same output, affecting most indicators negatively and reducing the feasibility for smallholders. Cassava and sweet sorghum performed similarly. Cassava production requires much more labour per hectare than production of sugarcane or sweet sorghum. Production of bioethanol feedstock on cultivated lands was more sustainable and had potential for carbon sequestration, avoiding GHG emissions from clearing natural vegetation if new land is opened.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01105.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>A biophysical model of Sugarcane growth</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01105.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A biophysical model of Sugarcane growth</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">S. V. CUADRA</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. H. COSTA</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. J. KUCHARIK</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">H. R. DA ROCHA</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J. D. TATSCH</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">G. INMAN-BAMBER</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R. P. DA ROCHA</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. C. LEITE</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">O. M. R. CABRAL</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01105.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01105.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01105.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">36</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">48</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Scientists predict that global agricultural lands will expand over the next few decades due to increasing demands for food production and an exponential increase in crop-based biofuel production. These changes in land use will greatly impact biogeochemical and biogeophysical cycles across the globe. It is therefore important to develop models that can accurately simulate the interactions between the atmosphere and important crops. In this study, we develop and validate a new process-based sugarcane model (included as a module within the Agro-IBIS dynamic agro-ecosystem model) which can be applied at multiple spatial scales. At site level, the model systematically under/overestimated the daily sensible/latent heat flux (by −10.5% and 14.8%, <em>H</em> and <em>λE</em>, respectively) when compared against the micrometeorological observations from southeast Brazil. The model underestimated ET (relative bias between −10.1% and –12.5%) when compared against an agro-meteorological field experiment from northeast Australia. At the regional level, the model accurately simulated average yield for the four largest mesoregions (clusters of municipalities) in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, over a period of 16 years, with a yield relative bias of −0.68% to 1.08%. Finally, the simulated annual average sugarcane yield over 31 years for the state of Louisiana (US) had a low relative bias (−2.67%), but exhibited a lower interannual variability than the observed yields.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Scientists predict that global agricultural lands will expand over the next few decades due to increasing demands for food production and an exponential increase in crop-based biofuel production. These changes in land use will greatly impact biogeochemical and biogeophysical cycles across the globe. It is therefore important to develop models that can accurately simulate the interactions between the atmosphere and important crops. In this study, we develop and validate a new process-based sugarcane model (included as a module within the Agro-IBIS dynamic agro-ecosystem model) which can be applied at multiple spatial scales. At site level, the model systematically under/overestimated the daily sensible/latent heat flux (by −10.5% and 14.8%, H and λE, respectively) when compared against the micrometeorological observations from southeast Brazil. The model underestimated ET (relative bias between −10.1% and –12.5%) when compared against an agro-meteorological field experiment from northeast Australia. At the regional level, the model accurately simulated average yield for the four largest mesoregions (clusters of municipalities) in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, over a period of 16 years, with a yield relative bias of −0.68% to 1.08%. Finally, the simulated annual average sugarcane yield over 31 years for the state of Louisiana (US) had a low relative bias (−2.67%), but exhibited a lower interannual variability than the observed yields.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01108.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01108.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JUAN YAN</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WENLI CHEN</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FAN LUO</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HONGZHENG MA</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AIPING MENG</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">XINWEI LI</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MING ZHU</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SHANSHAN LI</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HAIFEI ZHOU</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WEIXING ZHU</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BIN HAN</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SONG GE</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JIANQIANG LI</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TAO SANG</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01108.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01108.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01108.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">49</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">60</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A growing body of evidence indicates that second-generation energy crops can play an important role in the development of renewable energy and the mitigation of climate change. However, dedicated energy crops have yet to be domesticated in order to fully realize their productive potential under unfavorable soil and climatic conditions. To explore the possibility of domesticating <em>Miscanthus</em> crops in northern China where marginal and degraded land is abundant, we conducted common garden experiments at multiple locations to evaluate variation and adaptation of three <em>Miscanthus</em> species that are likely to serve as the wild progenitors of the energy crops. A total of 93 populations of <em>Miscanthus sinensis, Miscanthus sacchariflorus</em>, and <em>Miscanthus lutarioriparius</em> were collected across their natural distributional ranges in China and grown in three locations that represent temperate grassland with cold winter, the semiarid Loess Plateau, and relatively warm and wet central China. Evaluated with growth traits such as plant height, tiller number, tiller diameter, and flowering time, the <em>Miscanthus</em> species showed high levels of genetic variation within and between species. There were significant site × population interactions for almost all traits of <em>M. sacchariflorus</em> and <em>M. sinensis</em>, but not <em>M. lutarioriparius</em>. The northern populations of <em>M. sacchariflorus</em> had the highest establishment rates at the most northern site owing to their strong cold tolerance. An endemic species in central China, <em>M. lutarioriparius</em>, produced not only the highest biomass of the three species but also higher biomass at the Loess Plateau than the southern site near its native habitats. These results demonstrated that the wild species harbored a high level of genetic variation underlying traits important for crop establishment and production at sites that are colder and drier than their native habitats. The natural variation and adaptive plasticity found in the <em>Miscanthus</em> species indicated that they could provide valuable resources for the development of second-generation energy crops.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>A growing body of evidence indicates that second-generation energy crops can play an important role in the development of renewable energy and the mitigation of climate change. However, dedicated energy crops have yet to be domesticated in order to fully realize their productive potential under unfavorable soil and climatic conditions. To explore the possibility of domesticating Miscanthus crops in northern China where marginal and degraded land is abundant, we conducted common garden experiments at multiple locations to evaluate variation and adaptation of three Miscanthus species that are likely to serve as the wild progenitors of the energy crops. A total of 93 populations of Miscanthus sinensis, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, and Miscanthus lutarioriparius were collected across their natural distributional ranges in China and grown in three locations that represent temperate grassland with cold winter, the semiarid Loess Plateau, and relatively warm and wet central China. Evaluated with growth traits such as plant height, tiller number, tiller diameter, and flowering time, the Miscanthus species showed high levels of genetic variation within and between species. There were significant site × population interactions for almost all traits of M. sacchariflorus and M. sinensis, but not M. lutarioriparius. The northern populations of M. sacchariflorus had the highest establishment rates at the most northern site owing to their strong cold tolerance. An endemic species in central China, M. lutarioriparius, produced not only the highest biomass of the three species but also higher biomass at the Loess Plateau than the southern site near its native habitats. These results demonstrated that the wild species harbored a high level of genetic variation underlying traits important for crop establishment and production at sites that are colder and drier than their native habitats. The natural variation and adaptive plasticity found in the Miscanthus species indicated that they could provide valuable resources for the development of second-generation energy crops.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01109.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Algal biochar: effects and applications</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01109.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Algal biochar: effects and applications</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MICHAEL I. BIRD</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CHRISTOPHER M. WURSTER</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PEDRO H. DE PAULA SILVA</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NICHOLAS A. PAUL</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ROCKY DE NYS</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01109.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01109.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01109.x</prism:url><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">61</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">69</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Algae represent a promising target for the generation of bioenergy through slow pyrolysis, leading to the production of biochar. This study reports experiments conducted on the production of freshwater and saltwater macroalgal biochar in pilot-scale quantities, the physical and chemical characteristics of the biochars, and their impact on plant growth. The biochars are low in carbon (C) content, surface area and cation exchange capacity, while being high in ash and nutrients. Trace element analysis demonstrates that macroalgal biochar produced from unpolluted water does not contain toxic trace elements in excess of levels mandated for unrestricted use as a biosolids amendment to soils. Pot trials conducted using a C and nutrient-poor soil, without and with additional fertilizer, demonstrate dramatic increases between 15 and 32 times, respectively, in plant growth rate for biochar treatments compared with the no biochar controls, with additional smaller increases when fertilizer was added. Pot trials conducted using a relatively fertile agricultural soil showed smaller but significant impacts of biochar amendment over the controls.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Algae represent a promising target for the generation of bioenergy through slow pyrolysis, leading to the production of biochar. This study reports experiments conducted on the production of freshwater and saltwater macroalgal biochar in pilot-scale quantities, the physical and chemical characteristics of the biochars, and their impact on plant growth. The biochars are low in carbon (C) content, surface area and cation exchange capacity, while being high in ash and nutrients. Trace element analysis demonstrates that macroalgal biochar produced from unpolluted water does not contain toxic trace elements in excess of levels mandated for unrestricted use as a biosolids amendment to soils. Pot trials conducted using a C and nutrient-poor soil, without and with additional fertilizer, demonstrate dramatic increases between 15 and 32 times, respectively, in plant growth rate for biochar treatments compared with the no biochar controls, with additional smaller increases when fertilizer was added. Pot trials conducted using a relatively fertile agricultural soil showed smaller but significant impacts of biochar amendment over the controls.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01110.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>The carbon implications of large-scale afforestation of agriculturally marginal land with short-rotation willow in Saskatchewan</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01110.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The carbon implications of large-scale afforestation of agriculturally marginal land with short-rotation willow in Saskatchewan</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beyhan Y. Amichev</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Werner A. Kurz</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carolyn Smyth</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken C. J. Rees</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01110.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01110.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01110.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">70</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">87</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Afforestation with short-rotation coppice (SRC) willow plantations for the purpose of producing bioenergy feedstock was contemplated as one potential climate change mitigation option. The objectives of this study were to assess the magnitude of this mitigation potential by addressing: (i) the land area potentially available for SRC systems in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada; (ii) the potential biomass yields of SRC plantations; and (iii) the carbon implications from such a large-scale afforestation program. Digital soils and land-use data were used to identify, map, and group into clusters of similar polygons 2.12 million hectares (Mha) of agriculturally marginal land that was potentially suitable for willow in the Boreal Plains and Prairies ecozones in Saskatchewan. The Physiological Principles in Predicting Growth (3PG) model was calibrated with data from SRC experiments in Saskatchewan, to quantify potential willow biomass yields, and the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3), was used to simulate stand and landscape-level C fluxes and stocks. Short-rotation willow plantations managed in 3 year rotations for seven consecutive harvests (21 years) after coppicing at Year 1 produced about 12 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> biomass. The more significant contribution to the C cycle was the cumulative harvest. After 44 years, the potential average cumulative harvested biomass C in the Prairies was 244 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (5.5 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) about 20% higher than the average for the Boreal Plains, 203 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (4.6 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). This analysis did not consider afforestation costs, rate of establishment of willow plantations, and other constraints, such as drought and disease effects on biomass yield. The results must therefore be interpreted as a biophysical mitigation potential with the technical and economic potential being both lower than our estimates. Nevertheless, short-rotation bioenergy plantations offer one potential mitigation option to reduce the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> accumulation in the earth's atmosphere and further research is needed to operationalise such a mitigation effort.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Afforestation with short-rotation coppice (SRC) willow plantations for the purpose of producing bioenergy feedstock was contemplated as one potential climate change mitigation option. The objectives of this study were to assess the magnitude of this mitigation potential by addressing: (i) the land area potentially available for SRC systems in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada; (ii) the potential biomass yields of SRC plantations; and (iii) the carbon implications from such a large-scale afforestation program. Digital soils and land-use data were used to identify, map, and group into clusters of similar polygons 2.12 million hectares (Mha) of agriculturally marginal land that was potentially suitable for willow in the Boreal Plains and Prairies ecozones in Saskatchewan. The Physiological Principles in Predicting Growth (3PG) model was calibrated with data from SRC experiments in Saskatchewan, to quantify potential willow biomass yields, and the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3), was used to simulate stand and landscape-level C fluxes and stocks. Short-rotation willow plantations managed in 3 year rotations for seven consecutive harvests (21 years) after coppicing at Year 1 produced about 12 Mg ha−1 yr−1 biomass. The more significant contribution to the C cycle was the cumulative harvest. After 44 years, the potential average cumulative harvested biomass C in the Prairies was 244 Mg C ha−1 (5.5 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) about 20% higher than the average for the Boreal Plains, 203 Mg C ha−1 (4.6 Mg C ha−1 yr−1). This analysis did not consider afforestation costs, rate of establishment of willow plantations, and other constraints, such as drought and disease effects on biomass yield. The results must therefore be interpreted as a biophysical mitigation potential with the technical and economic potential being both lower than our estimates. Nevertheless, short-rotation bioenergy plantations offer one potential mitigation option to reduce the rate of CO2 accumulation in the earth's atmosphere and further research is needed to operationalise such a mitigation effort.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01112.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>An optimization model for energy crop supply</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01112.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">An optimization model for energy crop supply</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shifeng Wang</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Astley Hastings</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Smith</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01112.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01112.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01112.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">88</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">95</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In this article we describe an optimization model, a mixed integer program, to determine the optimal locations and capacity sizes of biomass-based facilities in energy crop supply chains, and demonstrate its use using data for Great Britain. We show the utility of the model for planning the optimal locations of biomass-based facilities by investigating the supply of feedstock from <em>Miscanthus</em> for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) in Great Britain, based on data of current electricity demand. Results show that CHP cost directly influences its optimal location, and the price of bioelectricity from <em>Miscanthus</em>. At the coarse spatial resolution of the available energy demand data, the sale price of <em>Miscanthus</em> does not greatly influence the quantity of <em>Miscanthus</em> sold in Great Britain. Only when the hypothetical sale price of <em>Miscanthus</em> was closer to CHP cost, was the quantity of <em>Miscanthus</em> sold influenced by the variation in the sale price of <em>Miscanthus</em>. In future, we will apply the model using electricity and heat demand data at fine spatial scale currently being located, which will allow the implications of local production of <em>Miscanthus</em> for CHP to be explored.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>In this article we describe an optimization model, a mixed integer program, to determine the optimal locations and capacity sizes of biomass-based facilities in energy crop supply chains, and demonstrate its use using data for Great Britain. We show the utility of the model for planning the optimal locations of biomass-based facilities by investigating the supply of feedstock from Miscanthus for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) in Great Britain, based on data of current electricity demand. Results show that CHP cost directly influences its optimal location, and the price of bioelectricity from Miscanthus. At the coarse spatial resolution of the available energy demand data, the sale price of Miscanthus does not greatly influence the quantity of Miscanthus sold in Great Britain. Only when the hypothetical sale price of Miscanthus was closer to CHP cost, was the quantity of Miscanthus sold influenced by the variation in the sale price of Miscanthus. In future, we will apply the model using electricity and heat demand data at fine spatial scale currently being located, which will allow the implications of local production of Miscanthus for CHP to be explored.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01113.x" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><title>Identifying grasslands suitable for cellulosic feedstock crops in the Greater Platte River Basin: dynamic modeling of ecosystem performance with 250 m eMODIS</title><link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01113.x</link><dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Identifying grasslands suitable for cellulosic feedstock crops in the Greater Platte River Basin: dynamic modeling of ecosystem performance with 250 m eMODIS</dc:title><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yingxin Gu</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen P. Boyte</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce K. Wylie</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Larry L. Tieszen</dc:creator><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00</dc:date><dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01113.x</dc:identifier><dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/><dc:publisher xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</dc:publisher><prism:doi xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01113.x</prism:doi><prism:url xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1757-1707.2011.01113.x</prism:url><prism:section xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">Original Research</prism:section><prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">96</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/">106</prism:endingPage><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h3 xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ol="http://www.wiley.com/namespaces/ol/xsl-lib">Abstract</h3><div class="para" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This study dynamically monitors ecosystem performance (EP) to identify grasslands potentially suitable for cellulosic feedstock crops (e.g., switchgrass) within the Greater Platte River Basin (GPRB). We computed grassland site potential and EP anomalies using 9-year (2000–2008) time series of 250 m expedited moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, geophysical and biophysical data, weather and climate data, and EP models. We hypothesize that areas with fairly consistent high grassland productivity (i.e., high grassland site potential) in fair to good range condition (i.e., persistent ecosystem overperformance or normal performance, indicating a lack of severe ecological disturbance) are potentially suitable for cellulosic feedstock crop development. Unproductive (i.e., low grassland site potential) or degraded grasslands (i.e., persistent ecosystem underperformance with poor range condition) are not appropriate for cellulosic feedstock development. Grassland pixels with high or moderate ecosystem site potential and with more than 7 years ecosystem normal performance or overperformance during 2000–2008 are identified as possible regions for future cellulosic feedstock crop development (ca. 68 000 km<sup>2</sup> within the GPRB, mostly in the eastern areas). Long-term climate conditions, elevation, soil organic carbon, and yearly seasonal precipitation and temperature are important performance variables to determine the suitable areas in this study. The final map delineating the suitable areas within the GPRB provides a new monitoring and modeling approach that can contribute to decision support tools to help land managers and decision makers make optimal land use decisions regarding cellulosic feedstock crop development and sustainability.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This study dynamically monitors ecosystem performance (EP) to identify grasslands potentially suitable for cellulosic feedstock crops (e.g., switchgrass) within the Greater Platte River Basin (GPRB). We computed grassland site potential and EP anomalies using 9-year (2000–2008) time series of 250 m expedited moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, geophysical and biophysical data, weather and climate data, and EP models. We hypothesize that areas with fairly consistent high grassland productivity (i.e., high grassland site potential) in fair to good range condition (i.e., persistent ecosystem overperformance or normal performance, indicating a lack of severe ecological disturbance) are potentially suitable for cellulosic feedstock crop development. Unproductive (i.e., low grassland site potential) or degraded grasslands (i.e., persistent ecosystem underperformance with poor range condition) are not appropriate for cellulosic feedstock development. Grassland pixels with high or moderate ecosystem site potential and with more than 7 years ecosystem normal performance or overperformance during 2000–2008 are identified as possible regions for future cellulosic feedstock crop development (ca. 68 000 km2 within the GPRB, mostly in the eastern areas). Long-term climate conditions, elevation, soil organic carbon, and yearly seasonal precipitation and temperature are important performance variables to determine the suitable areas in this study. The final map delineating the suitable areas within the GPRB provides a new monitoring and modeling approach that can contribute to decision support tools to help land managers and decision makers make optimal land use decisions regarding cellulosic feedstock crop development and sustainability.</description></item></rdf:RDF>
