Volume 22, Issue 16 p. 3371-3377
Full Paper

Charge Density Dependent Nongeminate Recombination in Organic Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells

Daniel Rauh,

Bavarian Center for Applied Energy, Research e.V. (ZAE Bayern), Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Carsten Deibel,

Corresponding Author

Experimental Physics VI, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Julius-Maximilian-University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Carsten Deibel, Experimental Physics VI, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Julius-Maximilian-University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Vladimir Dyakonov, Bavarian Center for Applied Energy, Research e.V. (ZAE Bayern), Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
Vladimir Dyakonov,

Corresponding Author

Bavarian Center for Applied Energy, Research e.V. (ZAE Bayern), Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Experimental Physics VI, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Julius-Maximilian-University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Carsten Deibel, Experimental Physics VI, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Julius-Maximilian-University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Vladimir Dyakonov, Bavarian Center for Applied Energy, Research e.V. (ZAE Bayern), Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 May 2012
Citations: 102

Abstract

Apparent recombination orders exceeding the value of two expected for bimolecular recombination have been reported for organic solar cells in various publications. Two prominent explanations are bimolecular losses with a carrier concentration dependent prefactor due to a trapping limited mobility and protection of trapped charge carriers from recombination by a donor–acceptor phase separation until re-emission from these deep states. In order to clarify which mechanism is dominant temperature- and illumination-dependent charge extraction measurements are performed under open circuit and short circuit conditions at poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl):[6,6]-phenyl-C61 butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PC61BM) and PTB7:PC71BM (poly[[4,8-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene-2,6-diyl][3-fluoro-2-[(2-ethylhexyl)carbonyl]thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl]]) solar cells in combination with current–voltage characteristics. It is shown that the charge carrier density n dependence of the mobility μ and the recombination prefactor are different for P3HT:PC61BM at temperatures below 300 K and PTB7:PC71BM at room temperature. Therefore, in addition to μ(n), a detrapping limited recombination in systems with at least partial donor–acceptor phase separation is required to explain the high recombination orders.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.