Volume 95, Issue 1 p. 5-26
ARTICLE

Well‐quasi‐ordering and finite distinguishing number

Aistis Atminas

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong‐Liverpool University, Suzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Brignall

Corresponding Author

School of Mathematics and Statistics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

Correspondence Robert Brignall, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom.

Email: rbrignall@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 November 2019
Citations: 2

[Correction updated after publication on dated 30 March 2020: abstract was revised]

Abstract

Balogh, Bollobás and Weinreich showed that a parameter that has since been termed the distinguishing number can be used to identify a jump in the possible speeds of hereditary classes of graphs at the sequence of Bell numbers. We prove that every hereditary class that lies above the Bell numbers and has finite distinguishing number contains a boundary class for well‐quasi‐ordering. This means that any such hereditary class which in addition is defined by finitely many minimal forbidden induced subgraphs must contain an infinite antichain. As all hereditary classes below the Bell numbers are well‐quasi‐ordered, our results complete the answer to the question of well‐quasi‐ordering for hereditary classes with finite distinguishing number. We also show that the decision procedure of Atminas, Collins, Foniok and Lozin to decide the Bell number (and which now also decides well‐quasi‐ordering for classes of finite distinguishing number) has runtime bounded by an explicit (quadruple exponential) function of the order of the largest minimal forbidden induced subgraph of the class.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.