Volume 83, Issue 2 p. 501-526
Article

Evaluating Workplace Mandates with Flows Versus Stocks: An Application to California Paid Family Leave

E. Mark Curtis,

E. Mark Curtis

Department of Economics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109, USA; E-mail: curtisem@wfu.edu.

Search for more papers by this author
Barry T. Hirsch,

Corresponding Author

Barry T. Hirsch

Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3992, and IZA (Bonn), USA; E-mail: bhirsch@gsu.edu.

E-mail: bhirsch@gsu.edu; corresponding author.Search for more papers by this author
Mary C. Schroeder,

Mary C. Schroeder

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA; E-mail: mary-schroeder@uiowa.edu.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 August 2016
Citations: 4

Abstract

Employer mandates typically have small effects on wages and employment. Such effects should be most evident using data on employment transitions and wages among new hires. Quarterly Workforce Indicators (QWI) provides county by quarter by demographic group data on the number and earnings of new hires, separations, and recalls (extended leaves). The QWI is used to examine the effects of California's 2004 paid family leave (CPFL) program, comparing outcomes for young women in California to those for other workers within and outside of California. CPFL had little effect on earnings for young women, but increased separations, hiring, and worker mobility.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.