Volume 39, Issue 2 p. 155-161
Original Article

Arguments for and against financial literacy education: where to go from here?

Liezel Alsemgeest,

Corresponding Author

Liezel Alsemgeest

Centre for Financial Planning Law, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Correspondence

Liezel Alsemgeest, Centre for Financial Planning Law, University of the Free State, C/o Dean and Sport Street, Bloemfontein, Free State 9330, South Africa.

E-mail: alsemgeestl@ufs.ac.za

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 February 2015
Citations: 34

Abstract

Currently, everyone is brandishing financial literacy education as the answer to the global personal financial crisis. However, there are a few advocates against financial literacy education. There is contention whether financial literacy education actually leads to effective financial behaviours. The purpose of this theoretical article is to state the various arguments for and against financial literacy education and suggest possible guidelines for interventions by governments and institutions in an effort to increase financial well-being. There are no easy answers to this complex problem and financial illiteracy should not be presented as the sole culprit. Basic financial literacy education is needed to manage day-to-day finances; however, specialist areas such as investments and retirement planning should be left to professionals. It is suggested that financial literacy education should focus not only on cognitive factors but also on non-cognitive and affective factors that might override rational decision making.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.