Volume 15, Issue 1 p. 188-205

International Outsourcing, Technological Change, and Wage Inequality

Alexander Hijzen,

Corresponding Author

Alexander Hijzen

School of Economics, University of Nottingham, University Park, UK

I would like to thank Bob Anderton, Rod Falvey, Holger Gorg, Bob Hine, Udo Kreickemeier, Daniel Mirza, Doug Nelson, Michael Pfaffermayr, an anonymous referee, and participants of the ETSG (2002), RES Annual Conference (2003), EEA Annual Congress (2003), and the workshop on outsourcing in Innsbruck (2003) for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are my own. Financial support from the ESRC (PTA-026-27-0733) and Leverhulme Trust (F114/BF) is gratefully acknowledged.

Hijzen: School of Economics, University of Nottingham, University Park, NG7 2RD, UK. E-mail: alexander.hijzen@nottingham.ac.uk.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 October 2006
Citations: 46

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of international outsourcing on UK wage inequality during the 1990s by applying the mandated wage approach proposed by Feenstra and Hanson (1999). The methodology is extended in order to obtain additional insight into the relative importance of the factor and sector bias of international outsourcing and technological change. The results indicate that technological change is the predominant force behind the increase in wage inequality, but international outsourcing also contributed significantly. In explaining the increase in wage inequality the factor bias of technological change was slightly larger than its sector bias, while for international outsourcing the sector bias was much more important. The relative importance of the two effects hinges crucially on the estimated rate of productivity passthrough.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.