Monitoring ecological characteristics of a tallgrass prairie using an unmanned aerial vehicle
Corresponding Author
Ryan C. Blackburn
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001-5640 U.S.A.
Address correspondence to R. C. Blackburn, email [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNicholas A. Barber
Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182-0001 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAnna K. Farrell
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Buscaglia
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001-5640 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorHolly P. Jones
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
Institute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability, and Energy, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ryan C. Blackburn
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001-5640 U.S.A.
Address correspondence to R. C. Blackburn, email [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNicholas A. Barber
Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182-0001 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAnna K. Farrell
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Buscaglia
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001-5640 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorHolly P. Jones
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
Institute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability, and Energy, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAuthor contributions: RCB, HPJ, NAB, AKF conceived the project, designed the research, and collected the data; RCB, RB analyzed the data; RCB wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Abstract
Site-specific conditions, climate, and management decisions all dictate the establishment and composition of desired plant communities within grassland restorations. The uncertainty, complexity, and large size of grassland restorations necessitate monitoring plant communities across spatial and temporal scales. Remote sensing with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may provide a tool to monitor restored plant communities at various scales, but many potential applications are still unknown. In a tallgrass prairie restoration located in Franklin Grove, IL, we used UAV-based multispectral imagery to assess the ability of spectral indices to predict ecological characteristics (plant community, plant traits, soil properties) in the summer of 2017. Using 19 sites, we calculated the moments of 26 vegetation indices and four spectral bands (green, red, red edge, near infrared). Models based on each moment and a model with all moments were estimated using ridge regression with model training based on a subset of 15 sites. Each tested for significant error reduction against a null model. We predicted mean graminoid cover, mean dead aboveground biomass, mean dry mass, and mean soil K with significant reductions in cross-validated root mean square error. Averaged coefficients determined from cross-validation of ridge regression models were used to develop a final predictive model of the four successfully predicted ecological characteristics. Graminoid cover and soil potassium were successfully predicted in one of the sites while the other two were not successfully predicted in any site. This study provides a path toward a new level of ease and precision in monitoring community dynamics of restored grasslands.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| rec13339-sup-0001-supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 737.8 KB | Table S1. Ecological characteristics of interest for prediction based on UAV monitoring. Table S2. Table of all spectral indices, their corresponding formulas, and references. Table S3. Results of 10 × 5-fold cross validation using the 15 training restoration sites for prediction of mean ecological characteristics for each model. Table S4. Results of 10 ×5-fold cross validation using the 15 training restoration sites for prediction of standard deviation ecological characteristics for each model. Figure S1. Correlations between mean spectral indices. Figures S2-S5. Coefficient magnitudes from repeated 10 × 5-fold cross validation for each successfully predicted ecological characteristic. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
LITERATURE CITED
- Ali I, Cawkwell F, Dwyer E, Barrett B, Green S (2016) Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management. Journal of Plant Ecology 9: 649–671
- Anderson RC (2006) Evolution and origin of the central grassland of North America: climate, fire, and mammalian grazers. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 133: 626–647
- Anderson K, Gaston KJ (2013) Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 138–146
- Andrade BO, Koch C, Boldrini II, Vélez-Martin E, Hasenack H, Hermann J-M, Kollmann J, Pillar VD, Overbeck GE (2015) Grassland degradation and restoration: a conceptual framework of stages and thresholds illustrated by southern Brazilian grasslands. Natureza & Conservação 13: 95–104
- Asner GP, Martin RE (2009) Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 269–276
- Barnes PW, Tieszen LL, Ode DJ (1983) Distribution, production, and diversity of C3- and C4-dominated communities in a mixed prairie. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 741–751
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 57: 289–300
- Biondini ME, Steuter AA, Hamilton RG (1999) Bison use of fire-managed remnant prairies. Journal of Range Management 52: 454
- Bouckaert RR, Frank E (2004) Evaluating the replicability of significance tests for comparing learning algorithms. Pages 3–12.In: H Dai, R Srikant, C Zhang (eds) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_3 (accessed 7 Aug 2020)
10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_3 Google Scholar
- Cordell S, Questad EJ, Asner GP, Kinney KM, Thaxton JM, Uowolo A, Brooks S, Chynoweth MW (2017) Remote sensing for restoration planning: how the big picture can inform stakeholders: remote sensing for restoration planning. Restoration Ecology 25: S147–S154
- Cruzan MB, Weinstein BG, Grasty MR, Kohrn BF, Hendrickson EC, Arredondo TM, Thompson PG (2016) Small unmanned aerial vehicles (micro-UAVs, drones) in plant ecology. Applications in Plant Sciences 4:1600041
- Denny M, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2012) Scaling up in ecology: mechanistic approaches. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43: 1–22
- Eby S, Burkepile DE, Fynn RWS, Burns CE, Govender N, Hagenah N, et al. (2014) Loss of a large grazer impacts savanna grassland plant communities similarly in North America and South Africa. Oecologia 175: 293–303
- Fan C, Rey SJ, Myint SW (2017) Spatially filtered ridge regression (SFRR): a regression framework to understanding impacts of land cover patterns on urban climate. Transactions in GIS 21: 862–879
- Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33: 1–24. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i01/ (accessed 10 Jan 2020).
- Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Kerby J, Hamilton R (2009) Pyric herbivory: rewilding landscapes through the recoupling of fire and grazing. Conservation Biology 23: 588–598
- González E, Rochefort L, Boudreau S, Hugron S, Poulin M (2013) Can indicator species predict restoration outcomes early in the monitoring process? A case study with peatlands. Ecological Indicators 32: 232–238
- Henwood WD (1998) Editorial—the world's temperate grasslands: a beleaguered biome. Parks 8: 1–2
- Hodgson JC, Mott R, Baylis SM, Pham TT, Wotherspoon S, Kilpatrick AD, Raja Segaran R, Reid I, Terauds A, Koh LP (2018) Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 1160–1167
- Holl KD (2017) Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up. Science 355: 455–456
- Holmgren P, Thuresson T (1998) Satellite remote sensing for forestry planning—a review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 90–110
- G James, D Witten, T Hastie, R Tibshirani (eds) (2013) An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. Springer, New York
10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 Google Scholar
- Kang J, Jin R, Li X, Zhang Y, Zhu Z (2018) Spatial upscaling of sparse soil moisture observations based on ridge regression. Remote Sensing 10: 192
- Kelly M, Di Tommaso S (2015) Mapping forests with Lidar provides flexible, accurate data with many uses. California Agriculture 69: 14–20
- Klopf RP, Baer SG, Bach EM, Six J (2017) Restoration and management for plant diversity enhances the rate of belowground ecosystem recovery. Ecological Applications 27: 355–362
- Knapp AK, Blair JM, Briggs JM, Collins SL, Hartnett DC, Johnson LC, Towne EG (1999) The keystone role of bison in North American tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 49: 39
- Koptilina DM (2019) IT-technologies in agriculture on the example of “drones”. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 274:012082
10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012082 Google Scholar
- Ling B, Goodin D, Mohler R, Laws A, Joern A (2014) Estimating canopy nitrogen content in a heterogeneous grassland with varying fire and grazing treatments: Konza prairie, Kansas, USA. Remote Sensing 6: 4430–4453
- Lorah P (2018) Using drones to generate new data for conservation insights. International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research 5: 1–13
- Lu B, He Y (2017) Species classification using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-acquired high spatial resolution imagery in a heterogeneous grassland. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 128: 73–85
- Lussem U, Bolten A, Menne J, Gnyp ML, Schellberg J, Bareth G (2019) Estimating biomass in temperate grassland with high resolution canopy surface models from UAV-based RGB images and vegetation indices. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 13: 1
- Melville B, Fisher A, Lucieer A (2019) Ultra-high spatial resolution fractional vegetation cover from unmanned aerial multispectral imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 78: 14–24
- Mishra N, Mainali K, Shrestha B, Radenz J, Karki D (2018) Species-level vegetation mapping in a Himalayan treeline ecotone using unmanned aerial system (UAS) imagery. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7: 445
- Moreno-Martínez Á, Camps-Valls G, Kattge J, Robinson N, Reichstein M, van Bodegom P, et al. (2018) A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data. Remote Sensing of Environment 218: 69–88
- Nowak MM, Dziób K, Bogawski P (2019) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in environmental biology: a review. European Journal of Ecology 4: 56–74
10.2478/eje-2018-0012 Google Scholar
- Owensby CE, Coyne PI, Ham JM, Auen LM, Knapp AK (1993) Biomass production in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated CO2. Ecological Applications 3: 644–653
- Parker IM, Mertens SK, Schemske DW (1993) Distribution of seven native and two exotic plants in a tallgrass prairie in southeastern Wisconsin: the importance of human disturbance. American Midland Naturalist 130: 43
- Pérez DR, Pilustrelli C, Farinaccio FM, Sabino G, Aronson J (2019) Evaluating success of various restorative interventions through drone- and field-collected data, using six putative framework species in Argentinian Patagonia. Restoration Ecology 28: A44–A53
- R Core Team (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
- Reif MK, Theel HJ (2017) Remote sensing for restoration ecology: application for restoring degraded, damaged, transformed, or destroyed ecosystems: remote sensing for restoration ecology. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 13: 614–630
- Rowe HI (2010) Tricks of the trade: techniques and opinions from 38 experts in tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 18: 253–262
- Schweiger AK, Cavender-Bares J, Townsend PA, Hobbie SE, Madritch MD, Wang R, Tilman D, Gamon JA (2018) Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2: 976–982
- Swenson NG (2014) Functional and phylogenetic ecology in R. Springer UseR! Series, Springer, New York
- Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 58: 267–288
- Underwood N, Hambäck P, Inouye BD (2005) Large-scale questions and small-scale data: empirical and theoretical methods for scaling up in ecology. Oecologia 145: 176–177
- Wallace RJ, Loffi JM, Ison AG, Courtney RM (2017) Evaluating methods of FAA regulatory compliance for educational use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Collegiate Aviation Review International 35: 25–51. https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/CARI/article/view/7434/6834 (accessed 17 Dec 2019)
10.22488/okstate.18.100473 Google Scholar
- Wang R, Gamon JA, Cavender-Bares J, Townsend PA, Zygielbaum AI (2018) The spatial sensitivity of the spectral diversity–biodiversity relationship: an experimental test in a prairie grassland. Ecological Applications 28: 541–556
- Wang R, Gamon J, Montgomery R, Townsend P, Zygielbaum A, Bitan K, Tilman D, Cavender-Bares J (2016) Seasonal variation in the NDVI–species richness relationship in a prairie grassland experiment (Cedar Creek). Remote Sensing 8: 128
- Weber S (1999) Designing seed mixes for prairie restorations: revisting the formula. Ecological Restoration 17: 196–201
10.3368/er.17.4.196 Google Scholar
- White RP, Murray S, Rohweder M (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: grassland ecosystems. World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.
- Wilhelm G, Rericha L (2017) Floar of the Chicago region: a floristic and ecological synthesis. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Williams D (2010) The Tallgrass Prairie Center guide to seed and seedling identification in the upper Midwest. 1st edition. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, Iowa
10.2307/j.ctt20mvf0j Google Scholar
- Xie Y, Sha Z, Yu M (2008) Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology 1: 9–23
- Xu Y, Smith SE, Grunwald S, Abd-Elrahman A, Wani SP, Nair VD (2018) Estimating soil total nitrogen in smallholder farm settings using remote sensing spectral indices and regression kriging. Catena 163: 111–122
- Zweig CL, Burgess MA, Percival HF, Kitchens WM (2015) Use of unmanned aircraft systems to delineate fine-scale wetland vegetation communities. Wetlands 35: 303–309




