Volume 21, Issue 22
Full Paper

Positive and Negative Lattice Shielding Effects Co‐existing in Gd (III) Ion Doped Bifunctional Upconversion Nanoprobes

Feng Chen

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Wenbo Bu

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: wbbu@mail.sic.ac.cn

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China.Search for more papers by this author
Shengjian Zhang

Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaohang Liu

Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Jianan Liu

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Huaiyong Xing

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Qingfeng Xiao

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Liangping Zhou

Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Weijun Peng

Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Lianzhou Wang

Chemical Engineering and ARC Centre of Excellence for Functional Nanomaterials, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jianlin Shi

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: jlshi@sunm.shcnc.ac.cn

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China

Group of Mesoporous and Low‐Dimensional Nano‐materials, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, P.R. China.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 September 2011
Citations: 176

Abstract

Gadolinium (Gd) doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have been well documented as T 1‐MR and fluorescent imaging agents. However, the performance of Gd3+ ions located differently in the crystal lattice still remains debatable. Here, a well‐designed model was built based on a seed‐mediated growth technique to systematically probe the longitudinal relaxivity of Gd3+ ions within the crystal lattice and at the surface of UCNPs. We found, for the first time, a nearly 100% loss of relaxivity of Gd3+ ions buried deeply within crystal lattices (> 4 nm), which we named a “negative lattice shielding effect” (n‐LSE) as compared to the “positive lattice shielding effect” (p‐LSE) for the enhanced upconversion fluorescent intensity. As‐observed n‐LSE was further found to be shell thickness dependent. By suppressing the n‐LSE as far as possible, we optimized the UCNPs' structure design and achieved the highest r 1 value (6.18 mM−1s−1 per Gd3+ ion) among previously reported counterparts. The potential bimodal imaging application both in vitro and in vivo of as‐designed nano‐probes was also demonstrated. This study clears the debate over the role of bulk and surface Gd3+ ions in MRI contrast imaging and paves the way for modulation of other Gd‐doped nanostructures for highly efficient T 1‐MR and upconversion fluorescent bimodal imaging.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.