The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Research Article

Antiquity and diversity of aboriginal Australian Y‐chromosomes

Nano Nagle

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kaye N. Ballantyne

Victorian Police Forensic Services Department, Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Department of Forensic Molecular Biology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Mannis van Oven

Department of Forensic Molecular Biology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Tyler‐Smith

The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Welcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Yali Xue

The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Welcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Duncan Taylor

Forensic Science South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Wilcox

Australian Genome Research Facility, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Leah Wilcox

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Rust Turkalov

Australian Genome Research Facility, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Roland A.H. van Oorschot

Victorian Police Forensic Services Department, Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Peter McAllister

Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Lesley Williams

Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Manfred Kayser

Department of Forensic Molecular Biology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Robert J. Mitchell

Corresponding Author

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Correspondence to: Robert J. Mitchell; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. E‐mail:

john.mitchell@latrobe.edu.au

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 October 2015
Cited by: 5

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Genographic Consortium members are listed in the Acknowledgments section.

ABSTRACT

Objective

Understanding the origins of Aboriginal Australians is crucial in reconstructing the evolution and spread of Homo sapiens as evidence suggests they represent the descendants of the earliest group to leave Africa. This study analyzed a large sample of Y‐chromosomes to answer questions relating to the migration routes of their ancestors, the age of Y‐haplogroups, date of colonization, as well as the extent of male‐specific variation.

Methods

Knowledge of Y‐chromosome variation among Aboriginal Australians is extremely limited. This study examined Y‐SNP and Y‐STR variation among 657 self‐declared Aboriginal males from locations across the continent. 17 Y‐STR loci and 47 Y‐SNPs spanning the Y‐chromosome phylogeny were typed in total.

Results

The proportion of non‐indigenous Y‐chromosomes of assumed Eurasian origin was high, at 56%. Y lineages of indigenous Sahul origin belonged to haplogroups C‐M130*(xM8,M38,M217,M347) (1%), C‐M347 (19%), K‐M526*(xM147,P308,P79,P261,P256,M231,M175,M45,P202) (12%), S‐P308 (12%), and M‐M186 (0.9%). Haplogroups C‐M347, K‐M526*, and S‐P308 are Aboriginal Australian‐specific. Dating of C‐M347, K‐M526*, and S‐P308 indicates that all are at least 40,000 years old, confirming their long‐term presence in Australia. Haplogroup C‐M347 comprised at least three sub‐haplogroups: C‐DYS390.1del, C‐M210, and the unresolved paragroup C‐M347*(xDYS390.1del,M210).

Conclusions

There was some geographic structure to the Y‐haplogroup variation, but most haplogroups were present throughout Australia. The age of the Australian‐specific Y‐haplogroups suggests New Guineans and Aboriginal Australians have been isolated for over 30,000 years, supporting findings based on mitochondrial DNA data. Our data support the hypothesis of more than one route (via New Guinea) for males entering Sahul some 50,000 years ago and give no support for colonization events during the Holocene, from either India or elsewhere. Am J Phys Anthropol 159:367–381, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Number of times cited: 5

  • , Aboriginal Australian mitochondrial genome variation – an increased understanding of population antiquity and diversity, Scientific Reports, 7, (43041), (2017).
  • , Aboriginal mitogenomes reveal 50,000 years of regionalism in Australia, Nature, 544, 7649, (180), (2017).
  • , Mitochondrial DNA diversity of present-day Aboriginal Australians and implications for human evolution in Oceania, Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 3, (343), (2017).
  • , Attitudinal Barriers to Reconciliation in Australia, The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation, 10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_7, (103-118), (2016).
  • , Who let the dogs in? A review of the recent genetic evidence for the introduction of the dingo to Australia and implications for the movement of people, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 7, (782), (2016).