Volume 169, Issue 3
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A method of sexing the human os coxae based on logistic regressions and Bruzek's nonmetric traits

Frédéric Santos

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: frederic.santos@u-bordeaux.fr

Université de Bordeaux – CNRS – MCC, UMR 5199 PACEA, Pessac, France

Correspondence

Frédéric Santos, Université de Bordeaux, UMR 5199 PACEA, Bâtiment B8, Allée Geoffroy Saint‐Hilaire, CS 50023, Pessac Cedex 33615, France.

Email: frederic.santos@u-bordeaux.fr

Search for more papers by this author
Pierre Guyomarc'h

Université Aix Marseille – CNRS – EFS, UMR 7268 ADES, Marseille, France

Search for more papers by this author
Rebeka Rmoutilova

Université de Bordeaux – CNRS – MCC, UMR 5199 PACEA, Pessac, France

Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Jaroslav Bruzek

Université de Bordeaux – CNRS – MCC, UMR 5199 PACEA, Pessac, France

Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 May 2019
Citations: 2

Funding information: Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Grant/Award Number: GAČR 14‐22823S; Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova, Grant/Award Number: GAUK 1088217

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims at proposing a visual method for sexing the human os coxae based on a statistical approach, using a scoring system of traits described by Bruzek (2002). This method is evaluated on a meta‐population sample, where the data were acquired by direct observation of dry bones as well as computed tomography (CT) scans. A comparison with the original Bruzek's (2002) method is performed.

Materials and methods

Five hundred and ninety two ossa coxae of modern humans are included in the reference dataset. Two other samples, composed respectively of 518 ossa coxae and 99 CT‐scan images, are both used for validation purposes. The individuals come from five European or North American population samples. Eleven trichotomic traits (expressing female, male, or intermediate forms) were observed on each os coxae. The new approach employs statistical processing based on logistic regressions. An R package freely available online, PELVIS, implements both methods.

Results

Both methods provide highly reliable sex estimates. The new statistical method has a slightly better accuracy rate (99.2%) than the former method (98.2%) but has also a higher rate of indeterminate individuals (12.9% vs. 3% for complete bones).

Conclusion

The efficiency of both methods is compared. Low error rates were preferred over high ability of reaching the classification threshold. The impact of lateralization and the asymmetry of observed traits are discussed. Finally, it is shown that this visual method of sex estimation is reliable and easy to use through the graphical user interface of the R package.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 2

  • Sex estimation using pelvis morphology, Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton, 10.1016/B978-0-12-815767-1.00006-7, (75-93), (2020).
  • Sex estimation in a modern Turkish population using the clavicle: a computed tomography study, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 10.1080/00450618.2020.1781255, (1-12), (2020).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.