Volume 22, Issue 4
Research Article

Similar processes despite divergent behavior in two commonly used measures of risky decision making

Anthony J. Bishara

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy J. Pleskac

Psychology Department, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel J. Fridberg

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eldad Yechiam

Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Jesolyn Lucas

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jerome R. Busemeyer

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peter R. Finn

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Julie C. Stout

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: julie.stout@med.monash.edu.au

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Indiana, USA

School of Psychology, Psychiatry, & Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

School of Psychology, Psychiatry, & Psychological Medicine, Room 534, Building 17, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 March 2009
Citations: 29

Abstract

Performance on complex decision‐making tasks may depend on a multitude of processes. Two such tasks, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART), are of particular interest because they are associated with real world risky behavior, including illegal drug use. We used cognitive models to disentangle underlying processes in both tasks. Whereas behavioral measures from the IGT and BART were uncorrelated, cognitive models revealed two reliable cross‐task associations. Results suggest that the tasks similarly measure loss aversion and decision‐consistency processes, but not necessarily the same learning process. Additionally, substance‐using individuals (and especially stimulant users) performed worse on the IGT than healthy controls did, and this pattern could be explained by reduced decision consistency. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.