Volume 27, Issue 6 p. 431-439
Review

Interaction of radio frequency electromagnetic fields and passive metallic implants—A brief review

Hanna Virtanen

Corresponding Author

Department of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland

Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

Department of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio, POB 1627, FIN‐70211 Kuopio, Finland.Search for more papers by this author
Jafar Keshvari

Nokia Technology Platforms, Espoo, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Reijo Lappalainen

Department of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 April 2006
Citations: 38

Abstract

During the last decade, use of radio frequency (RF) applications like mobile phones and other wireless devices, has increased remarkably. This has triggered numerous studies related to possible health risks due to the exposure of RF electromagnetic (EM) fields. One safety aspect is the coupling of EM fields with active and passive implants in the human body. While interactions with active implants have been quite extensively researched, only a few studies have focused on passive implants. The present article reviews interaction mechanisms and studies of passive metallic, that is, conductive, implants in common external RF EM fields. It is found that implants have been mostly studied numerically, and experimental studies are rare. Furthermore, the studies cover mostly far‐field conditions and only a few have studied implants in near fields. A summary of results indicates that a conductive object in tissues may cause notable local enhancement of the EM field and thus enhanced power absorption. The degree of enhancement depends, for example, on the orientation, the dimensions, the shape, and the location of the implant. However, in most of the cases, the field enhancement has not been strong enough to cause remarkable excess heating (more than 1 °C) of tissues. Bioelectromagnetics 27:431–439, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.