The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Governance, accountability and the datafication of early years education in England

Guy Roberts‐Holmes

Corresponding Author

UCL Institute of Education, University College London, , UK

Corresponding author. Department of Learning and Leadership, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK. Email:

g.roberts-holmes@ioe.ac.uk

.
Search for more papers by this author
Alice Bradbury

UCL Institute of Education, University College London, , UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2016
Cited by: 10

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to critically ‘make visible the flow and circulation of data’ through analysing the datafication of the early years education sector in England (children aged 2–5). The concept of datafication is used to understand the processes and impacts of burgeoning data‐based governance and accountability regimes. This analysis builds upon early childhood researchers who were influenced by Foucault and others, who have noted the ways in which the surveillance and performative culture of accountability both affirms, legitimates and seduces through discourses of quality while increasingly regulating and governing the early years. Using data from three research sites (a children's centre, a primary school and a combined nursery school and children's centre) as well as an interview with a local authority early years advisor, we examine how comparative data‐based accountability increasingly governed early years teachers' professionalism and pedagogies. We argue that the planned tracking of children's performance from baseline assessment at four years old to eleven years old may further govern and constrain early years professionalism as young children are reconfigured as ‘miniature centres of calculation’.

Number of times cited: 10

  • , The new youth sector assemblage: reforming youth provision through a finance capital imaginary, Journal of Education Policy, 33, 2, (226), (2018).
  • , Primary schools and network governance: A policy analysis of reception baseline assessment, British Educational Research Journal, 43, 4, (671-682), (2017).
  • , Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22, 5, (473), (2017).
  • , Where is the ethic of care in early childhood summative assessment?, Global Studies of Childhood, 7, 4, (357), (2017).
  • , The imaginaries that survived: Societal roles of early childhood education in an era of intensification, Global Studies of Childhood, (204361061770493), (2017).
  • , Not all pedagogies are created equal: researching and resisting teacher-led early childhood education for urban communities, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 5, (748), (2017).
  • , Challenging Global Geographies of Power: Sending Children back to Nigeria from the United Kingdom for Education, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59, 04, (818), (2017).
  • , Creating an Ofsted story: the role of early years assessment data in schools’ narratives of progress, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 7, (943), (2017).
  • , The enactment of literacy curriculum policy by early childhood teachers in two Australian schools, Literacy, , (2018).
  • , Early childhood teachers’ work and technology in an era of assessment, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10.1080/1350293X.2018.1533709, (1-13), (2018).