The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Is engaging in evidence‐informed practice in education rational? What accounts for discrepancies in teachers' attitudes towards evidence use and actual instances of evidence use in schools?

Chris Brown

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: chris.brown@ioe.ac.uk

UCL Institute of Education, University College London, , London, UK

Corresponding author: UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK;

Email: chris.brown@ioe.ac.uk;

Twitter: @chrisbrown1475

Search for more papers by this author
Dell Zhang

Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Birkbeck, University of London, , London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 August 2016
Cited by: 8

Abstract

Whilst beneficial, the consistent and regular use of evidence to improve teaching and learning in schools is proving difficult to achieve in practice. This paper attempts to shed new light on this issue by examining the applicability of a model of rational behaviour as it relates to the notion of evidence‐informed practice (EIP). Specifically, exploring the question: ‘if EIP is rational behavior, why aren't all teachers engaged in it?’, we examine whether the beliefs and perspectives of teachers in relation to EIP, align with their evidence‐use behaviours. We then assess what factors (if any) prevent teachers/schools who wish to engage in EIP from doing so. To examine beliefs, instances of, and barriers to evidence use, we employ a Gradient Boosted Tree predictive model to analyse data from a survey of 696 practitioners in 79 schools. Our findings suggest that, should they wish to increase EIP within their schools, school leaders need to: 1) promote the vision for evidence‐use (i.e. actively encourage its use); 2) illustrate how research and evidence can be effectively employed to enhance aspects of teaching and learning; and 3) establish effective learning environments, in which learning conversations around the use of evidence, can flourish. Simultaneously we caution that evidence use will never be fully or meaningfully realised unless school leaders prioritise EIP as a school commitment. Simultaneously, it is unlikely that such prioritisation will occur until EIP forms part of any education system's accountability regime.

Number of times cited: 8

  • , Irish teachers, starting on a journey of data use for school self-evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.11.001, 60, (1-13), (2019).
  • , The convivial space – exploring teacher learning through practitioner research, Professional Development in Education, (1), (2018).
  • , Introduction, Achieving Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education, 10.1108/978-1-78743-640-420171013, (1-20), (2017).
  • , The invisible impact of educational research, Oxford Review of Education, 43, 6, (718), (2017).
  • , The Vital Role of Trust and Relationships, Achieving Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education, 10.1108/978-1-78743-640-420171007, (65-88), (2017).
  • , Learning from Teachers’ Perceptions of Research Use, Achieving Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education, 10.1108/978-1-78743-640-420171006, (45-64), (2017).
  • , Further exploring the rationality of evidence informed practice: A semiotic analysis of the perspectives of a school federation, International Journal of Educational Research, 82, (28), (2017).
  • , Is Using Evidence to Inform Teaching Practice Rational?, Achieving Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education, 10.1108/978-1-78743-640-420171005, (23-43), (2017).