The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Adolescent moral judgement: A study of UK secondary school pupils

David Ian Walker

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: Davidianwalker33@gmail.com

Northumbria University/Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University of Birmingham, , UK

Corresponding author. Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. E‐mail:

Davidianwalker33@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen J. Thoma

University of Alabama/Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University of Birmingham, , UK

Search for more papers by this author
Kristján Kristjánsson

Northumbria University/Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University of Birmingham, , UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 May 2017
Cited by: 3

Abstract

Despite a recent world‐wide upsurge of academic interest in moral and character education, little is known about pupils’ character development in schools, especially in the UK context. The authors used a version of the Intermediate Concept Measure for Adolescents, involving dilemmas, to assess an important component of character—moral judgement—among 4053 pupils aged 14–15. Data were generated in 33 UK schools of varying types between February 2013 and June 2014. Results showed that compared with US samples, the pupils’ scores were, on average, low, suggestive of tendencies towards ‘self‐interest’, ‘not getting involved’ and ‘conformity/loyalty to friends’. Judgements varied by subscales assessing ‘action’ and ‘justification’ choices; pupils more successfully identified good actions than good justifications, but generally struggled more to successfully identify poor actions and poor justifications. Highest scores were for a dilemma emphasising ‘self‐discipline’ and lowest for ‘honesty’, with ‘courage’ in between. Overall average results were significantly and positively associated with being female, having (and practising) a religion and doing specific extra‐curricular activities. Differences in schools were also noted, although the kinds of school (e.g. public/private, religious/secular) were unrelated to student scores.

Number of times cited: 3

  • , Relationships between religion, risk behaviors and prosociality among secondary school students in Peru and El Salvador, Journal of Moral Education, 10.1080/03057240.2018.1438250, (1-15), (2018).
  • , The social construction of character, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, , (2018).
  • , Teaching character; cultivating virtue perception and virtue reasoning through the curriculum, Educational Review, 10.1080/00131911.2018.1538937, (1-18), (2018).