The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Brokering to support participation of disadvantaged families in early childhood education

Linda Mitchell

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: lindamit@waikato.ac.nz

Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, , Hamilton, New Zealand

Corresponding author. Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, Waikato, New Zealand. E‐mail:

lindamit@waikato.ac.nz

Search for more papers by this author
Patricia Meagher‐Lundberg

Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, , Hamilton, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 August 2017
Cited by: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses findings from an evaluation of the New Zealand Ministry of Education's Early Childhood Education (ECE) Participation Programme that targeted local areas where there are high numbers of children starting school who have not participated in ECE. The aim of the programme is to increase participation of these low‐income ‘priority’ children in ‘quality’ ECE. In this paper, two policy initiatives and features that supported participation in ECE are analysed. Engaging Priority Families (EPF) involves a coordinator working with families to encourage ECE participation, home learning and a positive transition to school. Targeted Assistance for Provision (TAP) grants are intended to increase local supply by helping establish new services and child spaces in communities where they are needed. The study used mixed methods: data on enrolments, surveys of Participation Programme providers, interviews with programme staff, surveys of families engaged in each initiative and interviews with a small group of families. The results show that cost, availability and cultural relevance of ECE services are the main barriers to participation of ‘priority’ families. Through brokering, both initiatives helped address complex social issues faced by the families by connecting families with health, housing and social agencies, and brokering understanding of ECE. The results support the argument that national policy initiatives and local actions can help address inequities in participation in ECE associated with socioeconomic status.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , ‘Universal’ early education: Who benefits? Patterns in take‐up of the entitlement to free early education among three‐year‐olds in England, British Educational Research Journal, 44, 3, (515-538), (2018).