Tutorial: Using Confidence Curves in Medical Research
Abstract
Confidence intervals represent a routinely used standard method to document the uncertainty of estimated effects. In most cases, for the calculation of confidence intervals the conventional fixed 95% confidence level is used. Confidence curves represent a graphical illustration of confidence intervals for confidence levels varying between 0 and 100%. Although such graphs have been repeatedly proposed under different names during the last 40 years, confidence curves are rarely used in medical research. In this paper, we introduce confidence curves and present a short historical review. We draw attention to the different interpretation of one‐ and two‐sided statistical inference. It is shown that these two options also have influence on the plotting of appropriate confidence curves. We illustrate the use of one‐ and two‐sided confidence curves and explain their correct interpretation. In medical research more emphasis on the choice between the one‐ and two‐sided approaches should be given. One‐ and two‐sided confidence curves are useful complements to the conventional methods of presenting study results. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 9
- Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer, Beyond the forest plot: The drapery plot, Research Synthesis Methods, 10.1002/jrsm.1410, 0, 0, (2020).
- Denis Infanger, Arno Schmidt‐Trucksäss, P value functions: An underused method to present research results and to promote quantitative reasoning, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8293, 38, 21, (4189-4197), (2019).
- Jan Hannig, Qing Feng, Hari Iyer, C.M. Wang, Xuhua Liu, Fusion learning for inter-laboratory comparisons, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2017.09.011, 195, (64-79), (2018).
- Thierry Denœux, Shoumei Li, Frequency-calibrated belief functions: Review and new insights, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.013, 92, (232-254), (2018).
- Saralees Nadarajah, Sergey Bityukov, Nikolai Krasnikov, Confidence distributions: A review, Statistical Methodology, 10.1016/j.stamet.2014.07.002, 22, (23-46), (2015).
- Min‐ge Xie, Kesar Singh, Confidence Distribution, the Frequentist Distribution Estimator of a Parameter: A Review, International Statistical Review, 10.1111/insr.12000, 81, 1, (3-39), (2013).
- Anders Källén, Learning About Parameters, and Some Notes on Planning, Understanding Biostatistics, 10.1002/9781119992677, (119-148), (2011).
- Stuart H. Hurlbert, Celia M. Lombardi, Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian, Annales Zoologici Fennici, 10.5735/086.046.0501, 46, 5, (311-349), (2009).
- Edgar Brunner, Martin Schumacher, Year 2005 – Report, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.200410211, 48, 2, (189-192), (2006).




