Volume 49, Issue 6
Clinical Trials

Blinded Sample Size Reestimation in Non‐Inferiority Trials with Binary Endpoints

Tim Friede

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: t.friede@warwick.ac.uk

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom

Phone: +44 24 7657 5664, Fax: +44 24 7657 4879Search for more papers by this author
Charles Mitchell

Seminar für Statistik, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Günther Müller‐Velten

Clinical Information Sciences, Novartis Pharma AG, 4002 Basel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 December 2007
Citations: 14

Abstract

Sample size calculations in the planning of clinical trials depend on good estimates of the model parameters involved. When the estimates of these parameters have a high degree of uncertainty attached to them, it is advantageous to reestimate the sample size after an internal pilot study. For non‐inferiority trials with binary outcome we compare the performance of Type I error rate and power between fixed‐size designs and designs with sample size reestimation. The latter design shows itself to be effective in correcting sample size and power of the tests when misspecification of nuisance parameters occurs with the former design. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 14

  • Noninferiority trials: What's clinically (ir)relevant?, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.168, (2020).
  • Score confidence intervals and sample sizes for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8674, 39, 24, (3427-3457), (2020).
  • Reduction of corticosteroid use in outpatient treatment of exacerbated COPD - Study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study, (The RECUT-trial), Trials, 10.1186/s13063-019-3856-8, 20, 1, (2019).
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: In Utero Treatment Today and Tomorrow , Fetal Therapy, 10.1017/9781108564434, (503-511), (2019).
  • Drug‐coated balloons for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: rationale and design of BASKET‐SMALL 2, Clinical Cardiology, 10.1002/clc.22942, 41, 5, (569-575), (2018).
  • Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial, The Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31719-7, 392, 10150, (849-856), (2018).
  • Sample Size Reassessment in Non-inferiority Trials, Methods of Information in Medicine, 10.3414/ME09-01-0063, 50, 03, (237-243), (2018).
  • Blinded sample size recalculation in clinical trials with binary composite endpoints, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2016.1198371, 27, 4, (705-715), (2016).
  • Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, as a component of first-line and second-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a phase III, randomised, double-blind study , Gut, 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311304, 65, 9, (1439-1446), (2016).
  • A Bayesian adaptive blinded sample size adjustment method for risk differences, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1708, 14, 6, (488-514), (2015).
  • Spline‐based procedures for dose‐finding studies with active control, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6320, 34, 2, (232-248), (2014).
  • Point and Interval Estimators of the Target Dose in Clinical Dose-Finding Studies with Active Control, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2014.920343, 25, 5, (939-957), (2014).
  • Sample Size Calculation and Blinded Sample Size Recalculation in Clinical Trials Where the Treatment Effect is Measured by the Relative Risk, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 10.1080/03610918.2012.674595, 42, 7, (1643-1653), (2013).
  • Blinded Sample Size Recalculation in Noninferiority Trials: A Case Study in Dermatology, Drug Information Journal, 10.1177/009286151004400507, 44, 5, (599-607), (2010).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.