The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Research Article

Counterfactual thinking and functional differences in depression

Ana Cristina Quelhas

Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Mick J. Power

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: mjpower@staffmail.ed.ac.uk

Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK and Department of Psychology, University of Tromsø, Norway

Clinical and Health Psychology, Edinburgh University, Medical School, Teviot Place. Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
Search for more papers by this author
Csongor Juhos

Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Jorge Senos

Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 September 2008
Cited by: 12

This research was partially supported by the European Program POCTI/PSI/42215—FEDER–FCT. Preliminary results were presented at the Fifth National Symposium of Research in Psychology, Lisbon 2003, and at the 9th International Conference on Motivation (EARLI) in 2004.

Abstract

The purpose of the studies reported in this paper was to evaluate the function of counterfactual thinking (CT) in depression. In Experiment 1, depressed and non‐depressed participants were asked to imagine themselves as the protagonist of a hypothetical situation, and to think counterfactually about three different scenarios. The results showed that there was a similar CT style (in terms of direction, structure and focus of mutation) for the depressed and the non‐depressed groups. It was also found that the perceived preparation for a future similar situation increased after CT and, contrary to our hypotheses, this effect was observed in both groups. In Experiment 2, a real‐life situation was used (a course examination) in which participants experienced a negative outcome (a poor score on the test). Again, it was observed that depressed and non‐depressed participants showed the same CT style, but non‐depressed participants were more likely to use CT spontaneously. In addition, the second study showed further differences between the two groups: depressed participants not only showed a lack of cognitive benefits from thinking counterfactually (i.e., after CT they do not feel more prepared for future similar events, nor able to avoid a similar bad outcome, in contrast to the non‐depressed participants), but also show a lack of behavioural changes (both intentions to change and actual changes over the subsequent week). In conclusion, these results provide evidence about the function of CT both in depressed and in non‐depressed thinking, and highlight both the similarities and differences for these two groups. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 12

  • , Upward counterfactual thinking and depression: A meta-analysis, Clinical Psychology Review, 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.010, 55, (56-73), (2017).
  • , The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking: New Evidence, New Challenges, New Insights, , 10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001, (1-79), (2017).
  • , Understanding Counterfactuality: A Review of Experimental Evidence for the Dual Meaning of Counterfactuals, Language and Linguistics Compass, 10, 2, (49-65), (2016).
  • , Depressive states amplify both upward and downward counterfactual thinking, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 97, 2, (93), (2015).
  • , Effect of Motivational Goals on the Causal Realism of Counterfactual Thoughts, The Journal of Psychology, 149, 7, (643), (2015).
  • , Reinforcement learning in depression: A review of computational research, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, (247), (2015).
  • , Styles of Counterfactual Thoughts in People with and without Signs of Depression, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, (2015).
  • , Counterfactual Processing of Economic Action-Outcome Alternatives in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Further Evidence of Impaired Goal-Directed Behavior, Biological Psychiatry, 75, 8, (639), (2014).
  • , How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: A comparison of students and jurors, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 3, (395-418), (2011).
  • , “If Only I Had Done Better”: Perfectionism and the Functionality of Counterfactual Thinking, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 12, (1675), (2010).
  • , Cognições sobre Eventos Passados: uma Revisão da Literatura, Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 10.15446/rcp.v27n2.65585, 27, 2, (103-116), (2018).
  • , Self-referent upward counterfactuals and depression: Examining regret as a mediator, Cogent Psychology, 10.1080/23311908.2017.1416884, 5, 1, (2018).