Volume 35, Issue 3 p. 305-316
Regular Article
Full Access

The assessment of body image investment: An extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory

Thomas F. Cash

Corresponding Author

Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529‐0267Search for more papers by this author
Susan E. Melnyk

Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

Search for more papers by this author
Joshua I. Hrabosky

Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Virginia Beach, Virginia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 March 2004
Citations: 284

Abstract

Objective

The Appearance Schemas Inventory (ASI) is a 14‐item instrument that assesses body image investment in relation to certain beliefs or assumptions about the importance, meaning, and influence of appearance in one's life. Despite empirical support of the ASI, critical examination evinces several limitations of this assessment. These problems entail the inclusion of explicitly self‐evaluative items and social stereotypes, few behavioral items, and a repeated failure to find expected gender differences on the ASI.

Method

We initially constructed a 45‐item measure (40 new items plus 5 original items) and administered it, along with the original ASI and other validational assessments, to 603 college students (468 women and 135 men).

Results

The end result was a 20‐item revision of the inventory (ASI‐R), which included two factors: Self‐Evaluative Salience and Motivational Salience. For both genders, the composite ASI‐R and its two factors had high internal consistency and were significantly convergent with other pertinent measures of body image and psychosocial functioning. The ASI‐R and its two subscales showed significant gender differences, whereas the original ASI did not. We also examined racial differences on the ASI‐R, its correlations with body mass, and its unique contribution to the prediction of disturbed eating attitudes.

Discussion

We offer this measure as an improved, psychometrically sound replacement for the ASI. © 2004 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 35: 305–316, 2004.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.