Volume 24, Issue 2
Research Article

Doubly balanced spatial sampling with spreading and restitution of auxiliary totals

Anton Grafström

Corresponding Author

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE‐90183 Umeå, Sweden

Correspondence to: Anton Grafström, Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE‐90183 Umeå, Sweden.

E‐mail: anton.grafstrom@slu.se

Search for more papers by this author
Yves Tillé

Institute of Statistics, Faculty of Economics, University of Neuchâtel, Pierre à Mazel 7, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 December 2012
Citations: 51

Abstract

A new spatial sampling method is proposed in order to achieve a double property of balancing. The sample is spatially balanced or well spread so as to avoid selecting neighbouring units. Moreover, the method also enables to satisfy balancing equations on auxiliary variables available on all the sampling units because the Horvitz–Thompson estimator is almost equal to the population totals for these variables. The method works with any definition of distance in a multidimensional space and supports the use of unequal inclusion probabilities. The algorithm is simple and fast. Examples show that the method succeeds in using more information than the local pivotal method, the cube method and the Generalized Random‐Tessellation Stratified sampling method, and thus performs better. An estimator of the variance for this sampling design is proposed in order to lead to an inference that takes the effect of the sampling design into account. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 51

  • Bibliography, Sampling and Estimation from Finite Populations, 10.1002/9781119071259, (379-404), (2020).
  • Estimating wild boar density and rooting activity in a Mediterranean protected area, Mammalian Biology, 10.1007/s42991-020-00030-0, 100, 3, (241-251), (2020).
  • Sequential process to choose efficient sampling design based on partial prior information data and simulations, Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100439, (100439), (2020).
  • A mixed sampling strategy for partially geo-referenced finite populations, Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100477, (100477), (2020).
  • Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/sjos.12441, 0, 0, (2020).
  • Sampling Strategies to Estimate Deer Density by Drive Counts, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10.1007/s13253-020-00386-3, (2020).
  • Datenerhebung bei Mietspiegeln: Überblick und Einordnung aus Sicht der StatistikCollection of data for rent indexes: Overview and discussion from a statistical perspective, AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, 10.1007/s11943-020-00272-x, (2020).
  • Spatial Spread Sampling Using Weakly Associated Vectors, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10.1007/s13253-020-00407-1, (2020).
  • Spatially balanced designs for transect‐based surveys, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.13321, 11, 1, (95-105), (2019).
  • Sampling for digital soil mapping: A tutorial supported by R scripts, Geoderma, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.036, 338, (464-480), (2019).
  • Food habits of wolves and selection of wild ungulates in a prey-rich Mediterranean coastal area, Mammalian Biology, 10.1016/j.mambio.2019.10.008, (2019).
  • Limited Spatial Transferability of the Relationships Between Kriging Variance and Soil Sampling Spacing in Some Grasslands of Ireland: Implications for Sampling Design, Pedosphere, 10.1016/S1002-0160(19)60801-5, 29, 5, (577-589), (2019).
  • Design-based consistency of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator under spatial sampling with applications to environmental surveys, Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2019.100404, (100404), (2019).
  • Spatially balanced sampling designs for environmental surveys, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 10.1007/s10661-019-7666-y, 191, 8, (2019).
  • Quantifying the trade-off between cost and precision in estimating area of forest loss and degradation using probability sampling in Guyana, Remote Sensing of Environment, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.018, 221, (122-135), (2019).
  • Extending ALS-Based Mapping of Forest Attributes with Medium Resolution Satellite and Environmental Data, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs11091092, 11, 9, (1092), (2019).
  • The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10.1007/s13253-018-0325-x, 23, 3, (358-373), (2018).
  • Spatio-temporal spillover risk of yellow fever in Brazil, Parasites & Vectors, 10.1186/s13071-018-3063-6, 11, 1, (2018).
  • Measuring the spatial balance of a sample: A new measure based on Moran’s index , Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2018.02.001, 23, (182-192), (2018).
  • Drawn-by-drawn sampling based on neighborhood matrix, Mathematical Population Studies, 10.1080/08898480.2018.1508189, (1-12), (2018).
  • The challenge of estimating a residual spatial autocorrelation from forest inventory data, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0247, 47, 11, (1557-1566), (2017).
  • Spatially Balanced Sampling: A Review and A Reappraisal, International Statistical Review, 10.1111/insr.12216, 85, 3, (439-454), (2017).
  • A spatially balanced design with probability function proportional to the within sample distance, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201600194, 59, 5, (1067-1084), (2017).
  • Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples, METRON, 10.1007/s40300-017-0123-1, 75, 3, (249-264), (2017).
  • Model-based variance estimation in non-measurable spatial designs, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2016.09.003, 181, (52-61), (2017).
  • A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement, Statistics & Probability Letters, 10.1016/j.spl.2016.09.027, 121, (1-5), (2017).
  • Mixed model regression estimation of a spatial total in the continuous plane paradigm, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2016.11.004, 185, (1-14), (2017).
  • Incomplete geocoding and spatial sampling: The effects of locational errors on population total estimation, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.10.002, 62, (1-6), (2017).
  • Spatially balanced designs that incorporate legacy sites, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.12782, 8, 11, (1433-1442), (2017).
  • A simple two-step method for spatio-temporal design-based balanced sampling, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 10.1007/s00477-017-1409-9, (2017).
  • Design-based estimation in environmental surveys with positional errors, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10.1007/s10651-017-0381-3, (2017).
  • Spatially-balanced sampling versus unbalanced stratified sampling for assessing forest change: evidences in favour of spatial balance, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10.1007/s10651-017-0378-y, (2017).
  • Design-based asymptotics for two-phase sampling strategies in environmental surveys, Biometrika, 10.1093/biomet/asw062, (asw062), (2017).
  • Design-Based Maps for Finite Populations of Spatial Units, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2016.1278174, (0-0), (2017).
  • Ordered spatial sampling by means of the traveling salesman problem, Computational Statistics, 10.1007/s00180-015-0635-1, 31, 4, (1359-1372), (2016).
  • Baseline estimates of soil organic carbon by proximal sensing: Comparing design-based, model-assisted and model-based inference, Geoderma, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.016, 265, (152-163), (2016).
  • Checking the performance of point and plot sampling on aerial photoimagery of a large-scale population of trees outside forests, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0013, 46, 11, (1264-1274), (2016).
  • From one- to two-phase sampling to reduce costs of remote sensing-based estimation of land-cover and land-use proportions and their changes, Remote Sensing of Environment, 10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.027, 184, (410-417), (2016).
  • Sample Size and Sample Allocation, Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys, 10.1007/978-3-662-46008-5_8, (197-217), (2015).
  • Spatial Sampling Designs, Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys, 10.1007/978-3-662-46008-5_7, (149-196), (2015).
  • Incorporating spatial and operational constraints in the sampling designs for forest inventories, Environmetrics, 10.1002/env.2366, 26, 8, (557-570), (2015).
  • Design‐based strategies for sampling spatial units from regular grids with applications to forest surveys, land use, and land cover estimation, Environmetrics, 10.1002/env.2332, 26, 3, (216-228), (2015).
  • Balanced sampling: A versatile sampling approach for statistical soil surveys, Geoderma, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.009, 253-254, (111-121), (2015).
  • Sampling strategies for estimating forest cover from remote sensing-based two-stage inventories, Forest Ecosystems, 10.1186/s40663-015-0042-7, 2, 1, (2015).
  • Optimising sampling designs for the maximum coverage problem of plume detection, Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2015.03.004, 13, (21-44), (2015).
  • Spatial Sampling for Agricultural Data, Contributions to Sampling Statistics, 10.1007/978-3-319-05320-2_12, (179-198), (2014).
  • Efficient sampling strategies for forest inventories by spreading the sample in auxiliary space, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0202, 44, 10, (1156-1164), (2014).
  • The Use of Spatial Sampling Designs in Business Surveys, Open Journal of Statistics, 10.4236/ojs.2014.45034, 04, 05, (345-354), (2014).
  • How to Select Representative Samples, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/sjos.12016, 41, 2, (277-290), (2013).
  • Complex national sampling design for long-term monitoring of protected dry grasslands in Switzerland, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10.1007/s10651-013-0263-2, 21, 3, (453-476), (2013).
  • Why Well Spread Probability Samples Are Balanced, Open Journal of Statistics, 10.4236/ojs.2013.31005, 03, 01, (36-41), (2013).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.