Choosy But Not Chaste: Multiple Mating in Human Females
Brooke A. Scelza is an Assistant Professor in the Anthropology Department at UCLA. Dr. Scelza is broadly interested in human behavioral ecology, life history theory, reproductive ecology, and maternal and child health. E‐mail: bscelza@anthro.ucla.edu
Abstract
When Charles Darwin set out to relate his theory of evolution by natural selection to humans he discovered that a complementary explanation was needed to properly understand the great variation seen in human behavior. The resulting work, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, laid out the defining principles and evidence of sexual selection.1 In brief, this work is best known for illuminating the typically male strategy of intrasexual competition and the typically female response of intersexual choice. While these sexual stereotypes were first laid out by Darwin, they grew in importance when, years later, A. J. Bateman, in a careful study of Drosophila mating strategies, noted that multiple mating appeared to provide great benefit to male reproductive success, but to have no such effect on females.2 As a result, female choice soon became synonymous with being coy, and only males were thought to gain from promiscuous behavior. However, the last thirty years of research have served to question much of the traditional wisdom about sex differences proposed by Darwin and Bateman, illuminating the many ways that women (and females more generally) can and do engage in multiple mating.
Number of times cited: 18
- Ashley Hazel, James Holland Jones and Marti Vall, Remoteness influences access to sexual partners and drives patterns of viral sexually transmitted infection prevalence among nomadic pastoralists, PLOS ONE, 13, 1, (e0191168), (2018).
- Camilla Power, Pair Bonds and the Evolution of Monogamy, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, (1-8), (2018).
- Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Economic inequality drives female sexualization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1812331115, 115, 35, (8658-8660), (2018).
- Laura D. Klein, Alicia A. Breakey, Brooke Scelza, Claudia Valeggia, Grazyna Jasienska, Katie Hinde and Ferenc Gallyas, Concentrations of trace elements in human milk: Comparisons among women in Argentina, Namibia, Poland, and the United States, PLOS ONE, 12, 8, (e0183367), (2017).
- Ryosuke Omori, Nico Nagelkerke and Laith J. Abu-Raddad, Nonpaternity and Half-Siblingships as Objective Measures of Extramarital Sex: Mathematical Modeling and Simulations, BioMed Research International, 2017, (1), (2017).
- Siobhán M. Mattison, Male-Provisioning Hypothesis, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_105-1, (1-6), (2017).
- Gemma Vall, Fernando Gutiérrez, Josep M. Peri, Miguel Gárriz, Eva Baillés, Juan Miguel Garrido and Jordi E. Obiols, Seven dimensions of personality pathology are under sexual selection in modern Spain, Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 3, (169), (2016).
- Kristin Snopkowski, Marital Dissolution and Child Educational Outcomes in San Borja, Bolivia, Human Nature, 27, 4, (395), (2016).
- Michael Gurven, Adrian V. Jaeggi, Frances J. White and Klaree J. Boose, Obstacles and catalysts of cooperation in humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees: behavioural reaction norms can help explain variation in sex roles, inequality, war and peace, Behaviour, 153, 9-11, (1015), (2016).
- Katherine Starkweather, Offspring Diversity Hypothesis, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_121-1, (1-2), (2016).
- Rebecca Sear, Beyond the nuclear family: an evolutionary perspective on parenting, Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, (98), (2016).
- Ike E. Onyishi, Pavol Prokop, Chiedozie O. Okafor and Michael N. Pham, Female Genital Cutting Restricts Sociosexuality Among the Igbo People of Southeast Nigeria, Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 2, (147470491664878), (2016).
- Isaac González-Santoyo and Carlos Cordero, Multiple Matings, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_70-1, (1-5), (2016).
- Garth J. O. Fletcher, Jeffry A. Simpson, Lorne Campbell and Nickola C. Overall, Pair-Bonding, Romantic Love, and Evolution, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 1, (20), (2015).
- Brian F. Codding and Douglas W. Bird, Behavioral ecology and the future of archaeological science, Journal of Archaeological Science, 56, (9), (2015).
- Lee T. Gettler, Applying socioendocrinology to evolutionary models: Fatherhood and physiology, "Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews", 23, 4, (146-160), (2014).
- Laith J. Abu-Raddad and Nico Nagelkerke, Biomarkers for sexual behaviour change, AIDS, 28, 8, (1243), (2014).
- Ryan Schacht, Helen E. Davis and Karen L. Kramer, Patterning of Paternal Investment in Response to Socioecological Change, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10.3389/fevo.2018.00142, 6, (2018).
