Volume 38, Issue 7
Research Article

Combining Family‐ and Population‐Based Imputation Data for Association Analysis of Rare and Common Variants in Large Pedigrees

Mohamad Saad

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen M. Wijsman

Corresponding Author

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

Correspondence to: Ellen M. Wijsman, Division of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195‐7720, USA. E‐mail: wijsman@u.washington.eduSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 01 August 2014
Citations: 19

This article was published online on 1 August 2014. Subsequently, it was determined that a typographical error had been introduced in the last block of equations on page 5, and the correction was published on 22 August 2014.

ABSTRACT

In the last two decades, complex traits have become the main focus of genetic studies. The hypothesis that both rare and common variants are associated with complex traits is increasingly being discussed. Family‐based association studies using relatively large pedigrees are suitable for both rare and common variant identification. Because of the high cost of sequencing technologies, imputation methods are important for increasing the amount of information at low cost. A recent family‐based imputation method, Genotype Imputation Given Inheritance (GIGI), is able to handle large pedigrees and accurately impute rare variants, but does less well for common variants where population‐based methods perform better. Here, we propose a flexible approach to combine imputation data from both family‐ and population‐based methods. We also extend the Sequence Kernel Association Test for Rare and Common variants (SKAT‐RC), originally proposed for data from unrelated subjects, to family data in order to make use of such imputed data. We call this extension “famSKAT‐RC.” We compare the performance of famSKAT‐RC and several other existing burden and kernel association tests. In simulated pedigree sequence data, our results show an increase of imputation accuracy from use of our combining approach. Also, they show an increase of power of the association tests with this approach over the use of either family‐ or population‐based imputation methods alone, in the context of rare and common variants. Moreover, our results show better performance of famSKAT‐RC compared to the other considered tests, in most scenarios investigated here.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 19

  • Correlation and association analyses in microbiome study integrating multiomics in health and disease, , 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.003, (2020).
  • Alternative Applications of Genotyping Array Data Using Multivariant Methods, Trends in Genetics, 10.1016/j.tig.2020.07.006, (2020).
  • A review of kernel methods for genetic association studies, Genetic Epidemiology, 10.1002/gepi.22180, 43, 2, (122-136), (2019).
  • Revisit Population-based and Family-based Genotype Imputation, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-018-38469-4, 9, 1, (2019).
  • The Mega2R package: R tools for accessing and processing genetic data in common formats, F1000Research, 10.12688/f1000research.15949.2, 7, (1352), (2019).
  • Kinpute: using identity by descent to improve genotype imputation, Bioinformatics, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz221, (2019).
  • Comparison and assessment of family- and population-based genotype imputation methods in large pedigrees, Genome Research, 10.1101/gr.236315.118, 29, 1, (125-134), (2018).
  • The Mega2R package: R tools for accessing and processing genetic data in common formats, F1000Research, 10.12688/f1000research.15949.1, 7, (1352), (2018).
  • General retrospective mega‐analysis framework for rare variant association tests, Genetic Epidemiology, 10.1002/gepi.22147, 42, 7, (621-635), (2018).
  • Association score testing for rare variants and binary traits in family data with shared controls, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 10.1093/bib/bbx107, 20, 1, (245-253), (2017).
  • Genotype Imputation Methods and Their Effects on Genomic Predictions in Cattle, Springer Science Reviews, 10.1007/s40362-017-0041-x, 4, 2, (79-98), (2017).
  • Family-based approaches: design, imputation, analysis, and beyond, BMC Genetics, 10.1186/s12863-015-0318-5, 17, S2, (2016).
  • Imputing rare variants in families using a two-stage approach, BMC Proceedings, 10.1186/s12919-016-0032-y, 10, S7, (2016).
  • PADRE: Pedigree-Aware Distant-Relationship Estimation, The American Journal of Human Genetics, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.020, 99, 1, (154-162), (2016).
  • A combined association test for rare variants using family and case-control data, BMC Proceedings, 10.1186/s12919-016-0033-x, 10, S7, (2016).
  • Identity-by-descent estimation with population- and pedigree-based imputation in admixed family data, BMC Proceedings, 10.1186/s12919-016-0046-5, 10, S7, (2016).
  • No association between ITGAV rs3738919 and rs3768777 polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility in Iranian population, LaboratoriumsMedizin, 10.1515/labmed-2016-0031, 40, 6, (2016).
  • Linkage Analysis of Urine Arsenic Species Patterns in the Strong Heart Family Study, Toxicological Sciences, 10.1093/toxsci/kfv164, 148, 1, (89-100), (2015).
  • Identification of rare variants in Alzheimer’s disease, Frontiers in Genetics, 10.3389/fgene.2014.00369, 5, (2014).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.