Volume 54, Issue 6 p. 3980-4000
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Neoarchean suprasubduction zone magmatism in the Sonakhan greenstone belt, Bastar Craton, India: Implications for subduction initiation and melt extraction

M.P. Manu Prasanth

School of Studies in Geology and Water Resource Management, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, India

Search for more papers by this author
K.R. Hari

Corresponding Author

School of Studies in Geology and Water Resource Management, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, India

Correspondence

K.R. Hari, School of Studies in Geology and Water Resource Management, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492010, India.

Email: krharigeology@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
N.V. Chalapathi Rao

Department of Geology, Centre of Advanced Study, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

Search for more papers by this author
M. Santosh

School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, 29 Xueyuan Road, 100083 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Guiting Hou

The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871 China

Search for more papers by this author
Toshiaki Tsunogae

Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Dinesh Pandit

Department of Geology, Centre of Advanced Study, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2018
Citations: 2

Abstract

The Neoarchean Sonakhan greenstone belt (SGB) in the north‐eastern Bastar Craton is mainly composed of an association of pillowed and massive tholeiitic basalts emplaced within an intraoceanic environment. Two types of ultrabasic rocks were identified and are designated as TH‐1 and TH‐2 on the basis of geochemical parameters. Both sample suites exhibit depletion of HFSE with reference to LILE and LREE, LREE/HFSE ratios, and negative Nb–Ta–Ti anomalies in the primitive mantle‐normalized multi‐element diagrams. The geochemical characters of TH‐1 and TH‐2 are consistent with Island arc tholeiites (IAT) and boninite‐like rocks of both Archean and Phanerozoic terranes. Mineral chemistry of clinopyroxenes from both volcanic suites indicate an oceanic arc affinity. The chromite chemistry indicate its derivation from a boninite‐like magma in a suprasubduction zone (SSZ) environment. Trace element modelling depicts that source depletion with significant influence of fluids derived from the subducting oceanic slab collectively controlled the trace element inventory of the mantle wedge, which result to the higher abundance of LREE and LILE compared to HREE and HFSE. The occurrence of lower basalt sequence followed by IAT and boninite‐like rocks in the SGB define a magmatic evolution which is comparable to the Phanerozoic ophiolite suites that exhibit subduction initiation prior to forearc rifting and suprasubduction zone magmatism. The subduction initiation in the intraoceanic lithosphere and the initial decompression melting followed by the upwelling of the MORB‐related magmas were attributed to the formation of the lower pillow basalts. Dehydration of the subducting plate and the melt extraction processes in the hydrous lherzolite mantle wedge account for the formation of TH‐1. Subsequent depletion and significant modification of a more refractory harzburgite source by the slab‐derived fluids generated the TH‐2 rocks. The compositionally diverse magmatic imprints with IAT and boninite affinity in the SGB indicate the significance of episodic melt extraction processes, dehydration of the subducting plate, and hydrous fluxing in SSZ tectonic setting.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.