Volume 55, Issue 5 p. 3870-3895
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Neoarchean arc magmatism and Paleoproterozoic granulite‐facies metamorphism in the Bhavani Suture Zone, South India

Sam Uthup

Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Toshiaki Tsunogae

Corresponding Author

Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan

Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa

Correspondence

Toshiaki Tsunogae, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305‐8572, Japan.

Email: tsunogae@geol.tsukuba.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
V.J. Rajesh

Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Trivandrum, India

Search for more papers by this author
M. Santosh

School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing, China

Department of Earth Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Yusuke Takamura

Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yukiyasu Tsutsumi

Department of Geology and Paleontology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Ibaraki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 September 2019

Abstract

The Bhavani Suture Zone in the Southern Granulite Terrane marks the zone of amalgamation of the Neoarchean Nilgiri Block and the northwestern Madurai Block in southern India. Here, we report detailed petrological, geochemical, and geochronological data on the Mettupalayam mafic–ultramafic complex within this suture zone with a view to evaluate the tectonothermal history of the Bhavani Suture Zone and adjoining crustal blocks. The metamorphosed complex includes charnockite, hornblende‐biotite gneiss, mafic granulite, amphibolite, garnet‐bearing mafic granulite, and dioritic gneiss along with metamorphosed banded iron formation. The mafic granulite and the dioritic gneiss occur as concordant layers of varying thickness within the hornblende‐biotite gneiss. The salient geochemical features of the mafic granulite and the dioritic gneiss including the enrichment of large‐ion lithophile elements and depletion of high‐field‐strength elements suggest a subduction‐related arc magmatic setting. However, the amphibolites show MORB‐related affinity, suggesting its formation from a N‐MORB‐related source and their accretion together with the overlying banded iron formation. The peak metamorphic conditions of the garnet‐bearing mafic granulite were estimated using conventional geothermobarometers as 800–820 °C/8.5–9.2 kbar, which we further confirm through phase equilibrium modelling in the Na2O–CaO–K2O–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O–TiO2–Fe2O3 (NCKFMASHTO) system. Magmatic zircons with high Th/U ratio from the amphibolite display a well‐defined discordia with an upper intercept age of 2,600 ± 38 Ma. Zircon grains from the dioritic gneiss show weighted mean 206Pb/207Pb age of 2,524 ± 6 Ma from concordant zircon spots and a comparable upper intercept age of 2,562 ± 34 Ma from discordant zircon spots, indicating protolith emplacement related to Neoarchean arc magmatism as inferred from our geochemical data. The thin overgrowth rims around the magmatic zircon grains in the amphibolite yielded an upper intercept age of 2,520 ± 20 Ma, which is comparable with the protolith crystallization age of the dioritic gneiss. Slightly younger weighted mean 207Pb/208Pb ages of 2,463 ± 27 Ma (from dioritic gneiss) and 2,422 ± 30 Ma (from amphibolite) are also obtained from the metamorphic zircon rims. These ages are correlated to the timing of high‐grade metamorphism associated with final collision of the Nilgiri Block and the northwestern Madurai Block. Similar Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic magmatism and high‐grade metamorphism were reported from many localities south of the Dharwar Craton. Our study further confirms the previous tectonic model that envisages multiple subduction and collision of magmatic arcs and continental fragments towards the Dharwar Craton during the Archean–Paleoproterozoic transition.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.