Volume 29, Issue 24 p. 5098-5108
Japanese Special Issue

Peak flow responses to strip thinning in a nested, forested headwater catchment

Bui Xuan Dung

Vietnam Forestry University, XuanMai, ChuongMy, Hanoi, Vietnam

Search for more papers by this author
Marino Hiraoka

Department of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3‐5‐8, Saiwai‐cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183‐8509 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takashi Gomi

Corresponding Author

Department of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3‐5‐8, Saiwai‐cho, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183‐8509 Japan

Correspondence to: Takashi Gomi, Department of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3‐5‐8, Saiwai‐cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183–8509, Japan.

E‐mail: gomit@cc.tuat.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Yuichi Onda

Center for Research of Isotope and Environmental Dynamics, University of Tsukuba, 1‐1‐1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305‐8572 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroaki Kato

Center for Research of Isotope and Environmental Dynamics, University of Tsukuba, 1‐1‐1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305‐8572 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2015
Citations: 6

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of 50% strip thinning on peak flow responses in 17‐ha and 9‐ha nested catchments. We observed 117 storm events from April 2010 to December 2013, including 32 events in the pre‐thinning period, 15 events during the thinning operation, and 70 events in the post‐thinning period. Paired‐catchment analysis with multiple pairs of nested gauging stations revealed that changes in peak flow responses varied depending on the location of the nested observation stations. Increases in peak flow during the operation period were significant in gauging stations located at the outlet and the middle of a catchment. Increases in peak flow during the post‐treatment period became significant in all nested catchments, but not in the catchment outlet. Rates of increase in peak flow ranged from 17.7% to 44.4%, which is within the range of previous studies. Different responses for changes in peak flow among nested pairs were associated with changes in internal hydrological flow pathways due to removal of timber and hydrological connectivity via overland flow generated by newly installed and reactivated skid trails. Our findings suggest that the effects of timber harvesting on peak flow are scale‐dependent with respect to drainage areas, hydrological links, and management practices. Selection of gauging locations and process‐based observations within catchments are essential for testing hypotheses related to the effects of timber harvesting with robust hydrological monitoring. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.