Volume 27, Issue 1
Research Article

Measuring the impact of nonignorability in panel data with non‐monotone nonresponse

Hui Xie

E-mail address: huixie@uic.edu.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr Yi Qian

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: yiqian@northwestern.edu.

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

2001 Sheridan Road, IL 60 208, USA.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 January 2012
Citations: 7

The authors contributed equally and are listed in reverse alphabetical order. Note: Correction added on 11 May 2011 after first publication online on 1 February 2010. The alphabetical ordering of the authors names has been corrected in this version of the article.

SUMMARY

The analysis of panel data with non‐monotone nonresponse often relies on the critical and untestable assumption of ignorable missingness. It is important to assess the consequences of departures from the ignorability assumption. Non‐monotone nonresponse, however, can often make such sensitivity analysis infeasible because the likelihood functions for alternative models involve high‐dimensional and difficult‐to‐evaluate integrals with respect to missing outcomes. We develop an extension of the local sensitivity method that overcomes computational difficulty and completely avoids fitting alternative models and evaluating these high‐dimensional integrals. The proposed method is applicable to a wide range of panel outcomes. We apply the method to a Smoking Trend dataset where we relax the standard ignorability assumption and evaluate how smoking‐trend estimates in different groups of US young adults are affected by alternative assumptions about the missing‐data mechanism. The main finding is that the standard estimate in the black male group is sensitive to nonignorable missingness but those in other groups are reasonably robust. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 7

  • A tractable method to account for high‐dimensional nonignorable missing data in intensive longitudinal data, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8560, 39, 20, (2589-2605), (2020).
  • Measuring the Impact of Nonignorable Missingness Using the R Package isni, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.06.014, 164, (207-220), (2018).
  • A scalable approach to measuring the impact of nonignorable nonresponse with an EMA application, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7078, 35, 30, (5579-5602), (2016).
  • Treatment Evaluation With Multiple Outcome Periods Under Endogeneity and Attrition, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2014.896804, 109, 508, (1697-1711), (2014).
  • Assessing the sensitivity of treatment effect estimates to differential follow-up rates: implications for translational research, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 10.1007/s10742-012-0089-7, 12, 2-3, (84-103), (2012).
  • An index of local sensitivity to non-ignorability for parametric survival models with potential non-random missing covariate: an application to the SEER cancer registry data, Journal of Applied Statistics, 10.1080/02664763.2012.710196, 39, 11, (2327-2348), (2012).
  • Adjusting for Nonignorable Missingness When Estimating Generalized Additive Models, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.200900202, 52, 2, (186-200), (2010).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.