Volume 21, Issue 2
Research Article

Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients

Erik Meijer

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: e.meijer@eco.rug.nl

Department of Econometrics, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands

Department of Econometrics, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, NL‐9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.Search for more papers by this author
Jan Rouwendal

Department of Economics of Consumers and Households, Wageningen University, PO Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 March 2006
Citations: 70

Abstract

In economic research, it is often important to express the marginal value of a variable in monetary terms. In random coefficient models, this marginal monetary value is the ratio of two random coefficients and is thus random itself. In this paper, we study the distribution of this ratio and particularly the consequences of different distributional assumptions about the coefficients. It is shown that important characteristics of the distribution of the marginal monetary value may be sensitive to the distributional assumptions about the random coefficients. The median, however, is much less sensitive than the mean. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 70

  • Conveyance, envy, and homeowner choice of appliances, Energy Economics, 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104816, (104816), (2020).
  • Linking urban air pollution with residents’ willingness to pay for greenspace: A choice experiment study in Beijing, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102383, (102383), (2020).
  • Consumers’ willingness to pay for electricity service attributes: A discrete choice experiment in urban Indonesia, Energy Reports, 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.018, 6, (562-571), (2020).
  • Individual preferences towards nuclear energy: the transient residency effect, Applied Economics, 10.1080/00036846.2019.1707766, (1-19), (2020).
  • A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.003, (2019).
  • Towards sustainable water management: Preferences and willingness to pay for smart landscape irrigation technologies, Land Use Policy, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.014, 85, (33-41), (2019).
  • Farmers’ willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services on agricultural land: The case of climate-smart agroforestry in Ethiopia, Ecosystem Services, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100964, 39, (100964), (2019).
  • Comparing results of ranking conjoint analyses, best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiments in a nonhypothetical context, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 10.1111/1467-8489.12292, 63, 2, (221-246), (2019).
  • Valuation of the Quality Attributes of Online Banking Services by Small and Medium Enterprises Engaged in International Trade, South African Journal of Economics, 10.1111/saje.12213, 87, 1, (65-81), (2019).
  • Do Ecolabels Cheapen Wines?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118696, (118696), (2019).
  • Valuing the water supply: ecosystem-based potable water supply management for the Legedadie-Dire catchments, Central Ethiopia, Ecological Processes, 10.1186/s13717-019-0160-1, 8, 1, (2019).
  • Public acceptance of and willingness-to-pay for nanofoods in the U.S., Food Control, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.004, 89, (219-226), (2018).
  • Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: insights from Kenya, Agriculture & Food Security, 10.1186/s40066-018-0200-6, 7, 1, (2018).
  • The cost of electric power outages in the residential sector: A willingness to pay approach, Applied Energy, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.007, 212, (141-150), (2018).
  • Heterogeneity in Urban Consumer Preferences for Turfgrass Attributes, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.003, (2018).
  • The Demand for Index‐Based Flood Insurance in a High‐Income Country, German Economic Review, 10.1111/geer.12142, 20, 2, (217-242), (2017).
  • Choice experiments and environmental taxation: An application to the Italian hydropower sector, ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 10.3280/EFE2016-003009, 3, (99-118), (2017).
  • Can insects increase food security in developing countries? An analysis of Kenyan consumer preferences and demand for cricket flour buns, Food Security, 10.1007/s12571-017-0676-0, 9, 3, (471-484), (2017).
  • Estimating policy values for in-vehicle comfort and crowding reduction in local public transport☆, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.016, 106, (453-472), (2017).
  • Welfare Implications of Congestion Pricing: Evidence from SFpark, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2834019, (2017).
  • Commercial Fisheries as an Asset for Recreational Demand on the Coast: Evidence from a Choice Experiment, Marine Resource Economics, 10.1086/693022, 32, 4, (391-409), (2017).
  • Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 10.1086/691697, 4, 2, (319-405), (2017).
  • Preference heterogeneity in energy discrete choice experiments: A review on methods for model selection, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.138, 69, (804-811), (2017).
  • Households’ Willingness-to-Pay for Fish Product Attributes and Implications for Market Feasibility of Wastewater-Based Aquaculture Businesses in Hanoi, Vietnam, Resources, 10.3390/resources6030030, 6, 3, (30), (2017).
  • Willingness to pay to reduce health risks related to air quality: evidence from a choice experiment survey in Beijing, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 10.1080/09640568.2017.1389701, (1-23), (2017).
  • Differences Between Classical and Bayesian Estimates for Mixed Logit Models: A Replication Study, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10.1002/jae.2513, 32, 2, (470-476), (2016).
  • Sustainable Urban Landscaping: Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Turfgrass Fertilizers, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 10.1111/cjag.12129, 65, 3, (385-407), (2016).
  • Does Fair Trade Compete with Carbon Footprint and Organic Attributes in the Eyes of Consumers? Results from a Pilot Study in Scotland, The Netherlands and France, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 10.1007/s10806-016-9642-7, 29, 6, (969-984), (2016).
  • Preferences for urban green spaces and peri-urban forests: An analysis of stated residential choices, Landscape and Urban Planning, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.013, 148, (120-131), (2016).
  • Valuing the Impacts of An Invasive Biological Control Agent: A Choice Experiment on the Asian Ladybird in France, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10.1111/1477-9552.12160, 67, 3, (619-638), (2016).
  • Quality uncertainty and the market for renewable energy: Evidence from German consumers, Renewable Energy, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.049, 94, (106-113), (2016).
  • Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Sustainable Products? A Study of Eco-Labeled Tuna Steak, Sustainability, 10.3390/su8050494, 8, 5, (494), (2016).
  • How Local Is Local? A Reflection on Canadian Local Food Labeling Policy from Consumer Preference, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 10.1111/cjag.12062, 64, 1, (71-88), (2015).
  • Neighborhood green and services diversity effects on land prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Luxembourg, Landscape and Urban Planning, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.008, 143, (100-111), (2015).
  • La pêche professionnelle est-elle un facteur d’attractivité récréative sur le littoral ?, Revue économique, 10.3917/reco.664.0729, 66, 4, (729), (2015).
  • Willingness to accept commuting time within the household: stated preference evidence, Transportation, 10.1007/s11116-014-9573-y, 43, 2, (219-241), (2014).
  • Controlling for the Effects of Information in a Public Goods Discrete Choice Model, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10.1007/s10640-014-9847-z, 63, 3, (523-544), (2014).
  • Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys, Resource and Energy Economics, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.05.002, 37, (39-63), (2014).
  • Accounting for uncertainty in willingness to pay for environmental benefits, Energy Economics, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.023, 44, (166-177), (2014).
  • The market value for product attribute improvements under price personalization, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.09.002, 31, 2, (168-177), (2014).
  • Erosive runoff events in the European Union: Using discrete choice experiment to assess the benefits of integrated management policies when preferences are heterogeneous, Ecological Economics, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.002, 102, (105-112), (2014).
  • The economic valuation of nature-based tourism in the South African Kgalagadi area and implications for the Khomani San ‘bushmen’ community, Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10.1080/21606544.2014.912594, 3, 3, (306-322), (2014).
  • Information technology and agency in physicians' prescribing decisions, The RAND Journal of Economics, 10.1111/1756-2171.12057, 45, 2, (422-448), (2014).
  • A Taste for Safer Beef? How Much Does Consumers’ Perceived Risk Influence Willingness to Pay for Country‐of‐Origin Labeled Beef, Agribusiness, 10.1002/agr.21365, 30, 1, (17-30), (2013).
  • Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation, Ecological Economics, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.001, 92, (67-77), (2013).
  • Price Competition Under Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand Functions, Management Science, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1664, 59, 8, (1817-1835), (2013).
  • Valuing Local Environmental Amenity with Discrete Choice Experiments: Spatial Scope Sensitivity and Heterogeneous Marginal Utility of Income, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10.1007/s10640-013-9648-9, 56, 1, (105-130), (2013).
  • Accounting for Uncertainty in Willingness to Pay for Environmental Benefits, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2319335, (2013).
  • U.S. Consumers’ Preference and Willingness to Pay for Country‐of‐Origin‐Labeled Beef Steak and Food Safety Enhancements, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01260.x, 61, 1, (93-118), (2012).
  • Network effects and preference heterogeneity in the case of mobile telecommunications markets, Telecommunications Policy, 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.005, 36, 3, (197-211), (2012).
  • Willingness-to-pay estimation with choice-based conjoint analysis: Addressing extreme response behavior with individually adapted designs, European Journal of Operational Research, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.002, 219, 2, (368-378), (2012).
  • Maximum Simulated Likelihood and Expectation-Maximization Methods to Estimate Random Coefficients Logit with Panel Data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.3141/2302-07, 2302, (65-73), (2012).
  • Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands, Journal of Health Economics, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.02.001, 31, 2, (371-378), (2012).
  • A Monte Carlo experiment to analyze the curse of dimensionality in estimating random coefficients models with a full variance–covariance matrix, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 10.1016/j.trb.2011.10.006, 46, 2, (321-332), (2012).
  • Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment, Empirical Economics, 10.1007/s00181-011-0500-1, 42, 2, (445-469), (2011).
  • Noncompensatory Dyadic Choices, Marketing Science, 10.1287/mksc.1110.0667, 30, 6, (1028-1047), (2011).
  • The information content of a stated choice experiment: A new method and its application to the value of a statistical life, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 10.1016/j.trb.2009.04.006, 44, 1, (136-151), (2010).
  • Assessment of Regeneration Projects in Urban Areas of Environmental Interest: A Stated Choice Approach to Estimate Use and Quasi-Option Values, Environment and Planning A, 10.1068/a4213, 42, 2, (452-468), (2010).
  • Promoting Brands Across Categories with a Social Cause: Implementing Effective Embedded Premium Programs, Journal of Marketing, 10.1509/jmkg.74.6.41, 74, 6, (41-60), (2010).
  • Online Demand Under Limited Consumer Search, Marketing Science, 10.1287/mksc.1100.0574, 29, 6, (1001-1023), (2010).
  • Combining Discrete and Continuous Representations of Preference Heterogeneity: A Latent Class Approach, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10.1007/s10640-010-9389-y, 47, 4, (477-493), (2010).
  • The Value of Informative Priors in Bayesian Inference with Sparse Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 10.1509/jmkr.46.6.832, 46, 6, (832-845), (2009).
  • Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10.1007/s10640-009-9303-7, 44, 4, (591-610), (2009).
  • Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty, Journal of Choice Modelling, 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70007-1, 2, 2, (118-147), (2009).
  • Online Demand Under Limited Consumer Search, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1340267, (2009).
  • Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment, Journal of Health Economics, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.11.006, 27, 4, (1078-1094), (2008).
  • Introduction to Multilevel Analysis, Handbook of Multilevel Analysis, 10.1007/978-0-387-73186-5, (1-75), (2008).
  • The Information Content of a Stated Choice Experiment: A New Method and its Application to the Value of a Statistical Life, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1136145, (2008).
  • Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10.1007/s11129-007-9024-6, 5, 3, (313-331), (2007).
  • Heterogeneity Distributions of Willingness-to-Pay in Choice Models, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.928412, (2007).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.