Volume 5, Issue 4
Original Article

A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta‐analysis

Ken J. Beath

Corresponding Author

Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109 Australia

Correspondence to: Ken J. Beath, Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia.

E‐mail: ken.beath@mq.edu.au

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 March 2014
Citations: 13

Abstract

When performing a meta‐analysis unexplained variation above that predicted by within study variation is usually modeled by a random effect. However, in some cases, this is not sufficient to explain all the variation because of outlier or unusual studies. A previously described method is to define an outlier as a study requiring a higher random effects variance and testing each study sequentially. An extension is described where the studies are considered to be a finite mixture of outliers and non‐outliers, allowing any number of outlier studies and the use of standard mixture model techniques. The bootstrap likelihood ratio test is used to determine if there are any outliers present by comparing models with and without outliers, and the outlier studies are identified using posterior predicted probabilities. The estimation of the overall treatment effect is then determined including all observations but with the outliers down‐weighted. This has the advantage that studies that are marginal outliers are still included in the meta‐analysis but with an appropriate weighting. The method is applied to examples from meta‐analysis and meta‐regression. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 13

  • Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/s12874-020-0911-9, 20, 1, (2020).
  • Skew‐normal random‐effects model for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201900184, 62, 5, (1223-1244), (2020).
  • Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280220925840, (096228022092584), (2020).
  • Robust estimation and confidence interval in meta-regression models, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2018.08.010, 129, (93-118), (2019).
  • Outlier detection and accommodation in meta-regression models, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 10.1080/03610926.2019.1652321, (1-17), (2019).
  • Statistical methods for detecting outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280219852747, (096228021985274), (2019).
  • A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials, Systematic Reviews, 10.1186/s13643-017-0668-3, 7, 1, (2018).
  • When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201800071, 60, 6, (1040-1058), (2018).
  • Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension, Educational Research Review, 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003, 25, (23-38), (2018).
  • Influence diagnostics in meta‐regression model, Research Synthesis Methods, 10.1002/jrsm.1247, 8, 3, (343-354), (2017).
  • Detecting outlying studies in meta‐regression models using a forward search algorithm, Research Synthesis Methods, 10.1002/jrsm.1197, 8, 2, (199-211), (2016).
  • Changes in albuminuria and cardiovascular risk under antihypertensive treatment, Journal of Hypertension, 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000991, 34, 9, (1689-1697), (2016).
  • New models for describing outliers in meta‐analysis, Research Synthesis Methods, 10.1002/jrsm.1191, 7, 3, (314-328), (2015).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.