Volume 7, Issue 1
Software Review

Automated drawing of network plots in network meta‐analysis

Gerta Rücker

Corresponding Author

Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center‐University of Freiburg, Germany

Correspondence to: Gerta Rücker, Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Stefan‐Meier‐Straße 26, D‐79104 Freiburg, Germany.

E‐mail: ruecker@imbi.uni‐freiburg.de

Search for more papers by this author
Guido Schwarzer

Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center‐University of Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 June 2015
Citations: 21

Abstract

In systematic reviews based on network meta‐analysis, the network structure should be visualized. Network plots often have been drawn by hand using generic graphical software. A typical way of drawing networks, also implemented in statistical software for network meta‐analysis, is a circular representation, often with many crossing lines. We use methods from graph theory in order to generate network plots in an automated way. We give a number of requirements for graph drawing and present an algorithm that fits prespecified ideal distances between the nodes representing the treatments. The method was implemented in the function netgraph of the R package netmeta and applied to a number of networks from the literature. We show that graph representations with a small number of crossing lines are often preferable to circular representations. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 21

  • Determining optimal strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review, cost-effectiveness review and network meta-analysis protocol, Systematic Reviews, 10.1186/s13643-020-01366-x, 9, 1, (2020).
  • Comparative Therapeutic Assessment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction—A Network Meta-Analysis, American Journal of Therapeutics, 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000892, 27, 3, (e286-e296), (2020).
  • Interventions for actinic keratosis in non-scalp and non-face localizations: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.021, (2020).
  • Effective SLOPE: EffectS of Lifestyle interventions in Older PEople with obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol, BMJ Open, 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038330, 10, 10, (e038330), (2020).
  • A Simple Method for Network Visualization, Mathematics, 10.3390/math8061020, 8, 6, (1020), (2020).
  • Systemic therapies for Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: a SCORTEN‐based systematic review and meta‐analysis, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 10.1111/jdv.16685, 0, 0, (2020).
  • Prevention of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators—A Network Meta-analysis, American Journal of Therapeutics, 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000928, 26, 4, (e469-e480), (2019).
  • Long-term efficacy of interventions for actinic keratosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis, Systematic Reviews, 10.1186/s13643-019-1156-8, 8, 1, (2019).
  • Perspective: Network Meta-analysis Reaches Nutrition Research: Current Status, Scientific Concepts, and Future Directions, Advances in Nutrition, 10.1093/advances/nmz036, (2019).
  • A comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 10.1007/s00432-019-02964-6, (2019).
  • Description of network meta-analysis geometry: A metrics design study, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0212650, 14, 2, (e0212650), (2019).
  • Automated methods to test connectedness and quantify indirectness of evidence in network meta‐analysis, Research Synthesis Methods, 10.1002/jrsm.1329, 10, 1, (113-124), (2018).
  • Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta‐regression, Research Synthesis Methods, 10.1002/jrsm.1292, 9, 2, (243-260), (2018).
  • References, Network Meta‐Analysis for Decision Making, 10.1002/9781118951651, (409-445), (2018).
  • Comparison of treatment options for depression in heart failure: A network meta-analysis, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.10.007, (2018).
  • Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Therapy in Early Cutaneous Lyme Borreliosis, JAMA Dermatology, 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3186, (2018).
  • Systematic evaluation on the clinical efficacy of acupoint stimulation therapy for treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency on the basis of network Meta-analysis, World Journal of Acupuncture - Moxibustion, 10.1016/S1003-5257(17)30137-X, 27, 3, (26-39), (2017).
  • Three-dimensional evidence network plot system: covariate imbalances and effects in network meta-analysis explored using a new software tool, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.008, 86, (182-195), (2017).
  • Operative and medical treatment of chronic anal fissures-a review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Journal of Gastroenterology, 10.1007/s00535-017-1335-0, 52, 6, (663-676), (2017).
  • A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis, Clinical Colorectal Cancer, 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.016, (2017).
  • Network Meta-Analysis, Meta-Analysis with R, 10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0_8, (187-216), (2015).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.