Volume 11, Issue 5
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five‐number summary

Jiandong Shi

Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Dehui Luo

Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Hong Weng

Center for Evidence‐Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xian‐Tao Zeng

Center for Evidence‐Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Lu Lin

School of Statistics, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, China

Zhongtai Securities Institute for Finance Studies, Shandong University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Haitao Chu

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Tiejun Tong

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: tongt@hkbu.edu.hk

Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

Correspondence

Tiejun Tong, Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

Email: tongt@hkbu.edu.hk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 June 2020

Funding information: General Research Fund, Grant/Award Number: HKBU12303918; The General Program, Grant/Award Numbers: 11671338, 11971265; The Century Club Sponsorship Scheme; Initiation Grant for Faculty Niche Research Areas, Grant/Award Number: RC‐IG‐FNRA/17‐18/13; National Library of Medicine, Grant/Award Number: R01LM012982

Abstract

When reporting the results of clinical studies, some researchers may choose the five‐number summary (including the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation (SD), particularly for skewed data. For these studies, when included in a meta‐analysis, it is often desired to convert the five‐number summary back to the sample mean and SD. For this purpose, several methods have been proposed in the recent literature and they are increasingly used nowadays. In this article, we propose to further advance the literature by developing a smoothly weighted estimator for the sample SD that fully utilizes the sample size information. For ease of implementation, we also derive an approximation formula for the optimal weight, as well as a shortcut formula for the sample SD. Numerical results show that our new estimator provides a more accurate estimate for normal data and also performs favorably for non‐normal data. Together with the optimal sample mean estimator in Luo et al., our new methods have dramatically improved the existing methods for data transformation, and they are capable to serve as “rules of thumb” in meta‐analysis for studies reported with the five‐number summary. Finally for practical use, an Excel spreadsheet and an online calculator are also provided for implementing our optimal estimators.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The numerical values of θ1 and θ2 in the shortcut formula (11) for Q up to 100 are available in Table 1.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.