Volume 37, Issue 5
REVIEW ARTICLE

Quality control in mass spectrometry‐based proteomics

Wout Bittremieux

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: wout.bittremieux@uantwerpen.be

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (Biomina), University of Antwerp/Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

Correspondence

Wout Bittremieux and Kris Laukens, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Middelheimlaan 1, Antwerp 2020, Belgium.

Email: wout.bittremieux@uantwerpen.be(WB); kris.laukens@uantwerpen.be (KL)

Search for more papers by this author
David L. Tabb

Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Francis Impens

VIB Proteomics Core, Ghent, Belgium

VIB‐UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent, Belgium

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
An Staes

VIB Proteomics Core, Ghent, Belgium

VIB‐UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent, Belgium

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Evy Timmerman

VIB Proteomics Core, Ghent, Belgium

VIB‐UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent, Belgium

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Lennart Martens

VIB‐UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent, Belgium

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Kris Laukens

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: kris.laukens@uantwerpen.be

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (Biomina), University of Antwerp/Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

Correspondence

Wout Bittremieux and Kris Laukens, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Middelheimlaan 1, Antwerp 2020, Belgium.

Email: wout.bittremieux@uantwerpen.be(WB); kris.laukens@uantwerpen.be (KL)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 September 2017
Citations: 28

Abstract

Mass spectrometry is a highly complex analytical technique and mass spectrometry‐based proteomics experiments can be subject to a large variability, which forms an obstacle to obtaining accurate and reproducible results. Therefore, a comprehensive and systematic approach to quality control is an essential requirement to inspire confidence in the generated results. A typical mass spectrometry experiment consists of multiple different phases including the sample preparation, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics stages. We review potential sources of variability that can impact the results of a mass spectrometry experiment occurring in all of these steps, and we discuss how to monitor and remedy the negative influences on the experimental results. Furthermore, we describe how specialized quality control samples of varying sample complexity can be incorporated into the experimental workflow and how they can be used to rigorously assess detailed aspects of the instrument performance.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 28

  • The promise and reality of therapeutic discovery from large cohorts, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 10.1172/JCI129196, (2020).
  • Proteomics in thyroid cancer and other thyroid-related diseases: A review of the literature, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140510, (140510), (2020).
  • RawVegetable – A data assessment tool for proteomics and cross-linking mass spectrometry experiments, Journal of Proteomics, 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103864, 225, (103864), (2020).
  • The Discovery of Clinically Applicable Biomarkers for Bipolar Disorder: A Review of Candidate and Proteomic Approaches, Chonnam Medical Journal, 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.3.166, 56, 3, (166), (2020).
  • Voltage Rollercoaster Filtering of Low-Mass Contaminants During Native Protein Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10.1021/jasms.9b00037, (2020).
  • Mass Spectrometry Advances and Perspectives for the Characterization of Emerging Adoptive Cell Therapies, Molecules, 10.3390/molecules25061396, 25, 6, (1396), (2020).
  • Simple Peptide Quantification Approach for MS-Based Proteomics Quality Control, ACS Omega, 10.1021/acsomega.0c00080, (2020).
  • Evaluation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid-Extraction Methods for Proteome Analysis: Comparison of Biopsy Elution versus Centrifugation, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00770, (2020).
  • Reducing Complexity? Cysteine Reduction and S-Alkylation in Proteomic Workflows: Practical Considerations, Mass Spectrometry of Proteins, 10.1007/978-1-4939-9232-4_7, (83-97), (2019).
  • QCMAP: An Interactive Web‐Tool for Performance Diagnosis and Prediction of LC‐MS Systems, PROTEOMICS, 10.1002/pmic.201900068, 19, 13, (2019).
  • Best practice in reporting corona studies: Minimum information about Nanomaterial Biocorona Experiments (MINBE), Nano Today, 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.06.004, (100758), (2019).
  • Quality control of imbalanced mass spectra from isotopic labeling experiments, BMC Bioinformatics, 10.1186/s12859-019-3170-1, 20, 1, (2019).
  • Characterization of a human liver reference material fit for proteomics applications, Scientific Data, 10.1038/s41597-019-0336-7, 6, 1, (2019).
  • Inferring protein-protein interaction networks from mass spectrometry-based proteomic approaches: A mini-review, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.05.007, (2019).
  • Quality will determine the future of mass spectrometry imaging in clinical laboratories: the need for standardization, Expert Review of Proteomics, 10.1080/14789450.2019.1624165, (1-12), (2019).
  • Extremely fast and accurate open modification spectral library searching of high-resolution mass spectra using feature hashing and graphics processing units, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00291, (2019).
  • 2018 YPIC Challenge: A case study in characterizing an unknown protein sample, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00384, (2019).
  • Mass spectrometry based proteomics as foodomics tool in research and assurance of food quality and safety, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.008, 77, (100-119), (2018).
  • Serine 105 and 120 are important phosphorylation sites for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus N protein function, Veterinary Microbiology, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.04.010, 219, (128-135), (2018).
  • Fast Open Modification Spectral Library Searching through Approximate Nearest Neighbor Indexing, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00359, 17, 10, (3463-3474), (2018).
  • Quantitation of Intact Proteins in Human Plasma Using Top-Down Parallel Reaction Monitoring-MS, Analytical Chemistry, 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02699, 90, 18, (10650-10653), (2018).
  • Detecting post-translational modification signatures as potential biomarkers in clinical mass spectrometry, Expert Review of Proteomics, 10.1080/14789450.2018.1483340, 15, 6, (515-535), (2018).
  • Preservation Method and Phosphate Buffered Saline Washing Affect the Acute Myeloid Leukemia Proteome, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10.3390/ijms19010296, 19, 1, (296), (2018).
  • Differential Integration of Transcriptome and Proteome Identifies Pan-Cancer Prognostic Biomarkers, Frontiers in Genetics, 10.3389/fgene.2018.00205, 9, (2018).
  • rawDiag: An R Package Supporting Rational LC–MS Method Optimization for Bottom-up Proteomics, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00173, (2018).
  • RawTools: Rapid and Dynamic Interrogation of Orbitrap Data Files for Mass Spectrometer System Management, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00721, (2018).
  • MSstatsQC 2.0: R/Bioconductor package for statistical quality control of mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments, Journal of Proteome Research, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00732, (2018).
  • Integrative Analysis of Proteomics Data to Obtain Clinically Relevant Markers, , 10.1007/7651_2017_94, (2017).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.