Volume 23, Issue 8
Original Report

Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study

M. Sanni Ali

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Rolf H. H. Groenwold

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Wiebe R. Pestman

Departamento de Matematica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Svetlana V. Belitser

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Kit C. B. Roes

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Arno W. Hoes

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Anthonius de Boer

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Olaf H. Klungel

Corresponding Author

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: O. H. Klungel, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: O.H.Klungel@uu.nlSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 29 January 2014
Citations: 9

The abstract has been presented in the 28th ICPE, 23–26 August 2012, Barcelona, and published in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2012; 21: (Suppl. 3): 36–37 DOI: 10.1002 as “Evaluating propensity score balance measures in typical pharmacoepidemiologic settings”.

ABSTRACT

Background

Conditional on the propensity score (PS), treated and untreated subjects have similar distribution of observed baseline characteristics when the PS model is appropriately specified. The performance of several PS balance measures in assessing the balance of covariates achieved by a specific PS model and selecting the optimal PS model was evaluated in simulation studies. However, these studies involved only normally distributed covariates. Comparisons in binary or mixed covariate distributions with rare outcomes, typical of pharmacoepidemiologic settings, are scarce.

Methods

Monte Carlo simulations were performed to examine the performance of different balance measures in terms of selecting an optimal PS model, thus reduction in bias. The balance of covariates between treatment groups was assessed using the absolute standardized difference, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov distance, the Lévy distance, and the overlapping coefficient. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) between each of these balance measures and bias were calculated.

Results

In large sample sizes (n ≥ 1000), all balance measures were similarly correlated with bias (r ranging between 0.50 and 0.68) irrespective of the treatment effect's strength and frequency of the outcome. In smaller sample sizes with mixed binary and continuous covariate distributions, these correlations were low for all balance measures (r ranging between 0.11 and 0.43), except for the absolute standardized difference (r = 0.51).

Conclusions

The absolute standardized difference, which is an easy‐to‐calculate balance measure, displayed consistently better performance across different simulation scenarios. Therefore, it should be the balance measure of choice for measuring and reporting the amount of balance reached, and for selecting the final PS model. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 9

  • Incidence of lower extremity amputations among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the United States from 2010 to 2014, Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 10.1111/dom.14012, 22, 7, (1132-1140), (2020).
  • Preferential prescribing of linagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients in an expanded post‐marketing surveillance study in Japan, Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 10.1111/jdi.13012, 10, 5, (1246-1253), (2019).
  • Propensity Score Methods in Health Technology Assessment: Principles, Extended Applications, and Recent Advances, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10.3389/fphar.2019.00973, 10, (2019).
  • Illustration of the Impact of Unmeasured Confounding Within an Economic Evaluation Based on Nonrandomized Data, MDM Policy & Practice, 10.1177/2381468317697711, 2, 1, (238146831769771), (2017).
  • A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 10.1002/pds.4121, 26, 4, (368-377), (2016).
  • The IMI PROTECT project: purpose, organizational structure, and procedures, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 10.1002/pds.3933, 25, S1, (5-10), (2016).
  • Constructing Causal Diagrams for Common Perinatal Outcomes: Benefits, Limitations and Motivating Examples with Maternal Antidepressant Use in Pregnancy, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 10.1111/ppe.12302, 30, 5, (521-528), (2016).
  • Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/s12874-015-0100-4, 16, 1, (2016).
  • Performance of prior event rate ratio adjustment method in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 10.1002/pds.3724, 24, 5, (468-477), (2014).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.