Volume 47, Issue 9
Research Article

Randomizing multiple contingency components to decrease disruptive behaviors and increase student engagement in an urban second‐grade classroom

Renee O. Hawkins

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: renee.hawkins@uc.edu

University of Cincinnati

University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210068, Cincinnati, OH 45221Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 August 2010
Citations: 13

Abstract

Disruptive behaviors displayed in the classroom interfere with learning by taking time away from academic instruction. This study investigated the effects of randomizing components within an interdependent group contingency for group disruptive behavior and engagement levels of 26 students in a second‐grade classroom in an urban Midwestern school. Using a multiple‐baseline‐across‐settings design, baseline levels of group disruptive behavior and engagement were compared to intervention levels across three different class periods. Results suggest that the intervention decreased levels of disruptive behavior and increased levels of student engagement. Benefits of randomizing components within an interdependent group contingency are discussed as well as limitations to this study and suggested areas of future research. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 13

  • Using response ratios for meta-analyzing single-case designs with behavioral outcomes, Journal of School Psychology, 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.003, 68, (99-112), (2018).
  • Behavior Bingo: The effects of a culturally relevant group contingency intervention for students with EBD, Psychology in the Schools, 10.1002/pits.22091, 55, 1, (63-75), (2017).
  • A Meta-Analysis of Class-Wide Interventions for Supporting Student Behavior, School Psychology Review, 10.17105/SPR-2017-0015.V46-2, 46, 2, (149-164), (2017).
  • A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Group Contingency Interventions for Students With Challenging Behavior: An Update, Remedial and Special Education, 10.1177/0741932517716900, 38, 6, (353-370), (2017).
  • Using Consultee-Centered Consultation with Teachers in a Contemporary School Setting to Inform Culturally Responsive Practice, Contemporary School Psychology, 10.1007/s40688-017-0135-0, 21, 3, (240-254), (2017).
  • Assessing the Accuracy of Classwide Direct Observation Methods: Two Analyses Using Simulated and Naturalistic Data, Behavioral Disorders, 10.17988/BD-15-49.1, 41, 3, (148-160), (2016).
  • The Quiet Classroom Game: A Class-Wide Intervention to Increase Academic Engagement and Reduce Disruptive Behavior, School Psychology Review, 10.17105/SPR45-1.93-108, 45, 1, (93-108), (2016).
  • An Evaluation of Group Contingency Interventions, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10.1177/1098300715577663, 18, 1, (17-28), (2015).
  • Effectiveness of a Universal, Interdependent Group Contingency Program on Children's Academic Achievement: A Countywide Evaluation, Journal of Applied School Psychology, 10.1080/15377903.2015.1025322, 31, 3, (199-218), (2015).
  • Group Contingency Interventions With Children—1980-2010, Behavior Modification, 10.1177/0145445514554393, 39, 2, (322-341), (2014).
  • UTILIZATION OF VIDEO MODELING COMBINED WITH SELF‐MONITORING TO INCREASE RATES OF ON‐TASK BEHAVIOR, Behavioral Interventions, 10.1002/bin.1379, 29, 2, (125-144), (2014).
  • Integrating a Social Behavior Intervention During Small Group Academic Instruction Using a Total Group Criterion Intervention, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10.1177/1098300713492858, 16, 4, (234-245), (2013).
  • A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior, Journal of School Psychology, 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.06.001, 50, 5, (625-654), (2012).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.