Volume 19, Issue 9 p. 959-966
Paper
Full Access

The role of appearance investment in the adjustment of women with breast cancer

Helena Moreira

Corresponding Author

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal

Linha de Investigação Relações, Desenvolvimento e Saúde, Instituto de Psicologia Cognitiva e Desenvolvimento Vocacional e Social da Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, Apartado 6153, 3001‐802 Coimbra, PortugalSearch for more papers by this author
Sónia Silva

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Cristina Canavarro

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 October 2009
Citations: 27

Abstract

Objective: Appearance investment can be considered an important factor in the explanation of individual differences in adjustment to breast cancer. This study aims to analyze the role of this variable on a set of adjustment outcomes, namely, quality of life (QOL), emotional adjustment (depression and anxiety) and fear of negative evaluations. The differential role of motivational salience facet of appearance investment (MS; the individual's efforts to be or feel attractive), conceptualized as a protective factor, and of self‐evaluative salience facet (SES; the importance an individual places on physical appearance for their definition of self‐worth), conceptualized as a vulnerability factor, is explored.

Methods: This cross‐sectional study included 117 Portuguese breast cancer patients (mean age=52.47; SD=8.81), on average 2.32 months (SD=2.17) post‐diagnosis. Appearance investment was measured by the ASI‐R; QOL by the WHOQOL‐bref; emotional adjustment by the HADS; and fear of negative evaluations by the FNE (Portuguese versions). Several hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted for each outcome, using investment facets as a predictor variable.

Results: Both facets of investment contributed to the explanation of social (p⩽0.001) and psychological (p⩽0.001) QOL and also depression (p⩽0.001), with SES being associated with poorer results and MS with better outcomes. SES also predicted higher levels of fear of negative evaluations (p⩽0.001).

Conclusions: This study provided significant information about the role of appearance investment in the adjustment of breast cancer patients and added empirical support to SES‐MS distinction. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.